• [sci.bio.food-science] Additions and Changes to FAQ, and New User Info

    From Paul King@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 27 00:02:42 2015
    XPost: sci.bio.food-science, news.answers

    Archive-Name: sci/food-science-faq/diff

    Posting-Frequency: biweekly
    Last-modified: 2014/04/18

    RECENT CHANGES (18 April 2014):

    Some changes to Where to download the FAQ. The temporary site name xvm-75.mit.edu is added and faqs.org is deleted, as it contains faqs
    that are years out of date.

    __

    INFORMATION FOR NEW USERS
    __

    NOTES ON 'NETTIQUETTE:

    Please read also FAQ 1/3, Part I: GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR POSTING IN
    SCI.BIO.FOOD-SCIENCE

    There has been a slow but sure trend in recent years for some
    posters to get emotional or to bait emotional debates with their
    postings. This is never a good thing, since discussions most
    commonly deteriorate into name-calling and so on. Others wonder
    why their posts hardly get any responses from this group. All this
    is discussed here.

    Emotional debates are common in any topic for which adherents hold
    passionate, but opposing, beliefs. One of life's many paradoxes
    holds that if you shout, you will not be heard. Keep your
    conversations polite and cordial. The basis of politeness means
    that you must realise that this is a text medium, and people
    cannot see your body language to find out what you intend with
    these words, and as a result most people tend to assume the worst.
    You have to be extra careful in how you word things with others.

    However, there are many other reasons your postings do not get
    desirable responses. First of all, realise that this is a food
    science newsgroup, and that most of the posters tend to tow the
    party line of science. If you find this hard to take, there are
    many other newsgroups that you might find more friendly. In FAQ
    1/3, for example, the newsgroup has many explicitly-stated goals,
    along with a newsgroup charter. These were agreed to and voted on
    over 10 years ago. Charters and statements of goals are a fact of
    life of all newsgroups under the sci.* hierarchy, and other
    hierarchies as well.

    While we welcome posts from anybody and everybody, you must ensure
    that your postings are on-topic. Some newsgroups dealing with
    other aspects of foods which we don't deal with:

    sci.med.nutrition rec.food.preserving rec.food.cooking
    rec.food.recipes alt.food.wine alt.food.fat-free
    rec.food-veg rec.food.veg.cooking alt.support.diet
    alt.food.vegan alt.food.vegan.science
    alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian alt.sport.weightlifting.vegetarian
    alt.support.diet.* (there are several newsgroups in this
    hierarchy)

    If you wonder why your posting garners few or no responses, it
    could be due to several reasons, including: 1) Nobody understood
    your post; 2) your post was not on-topic for the newsgroup, 3)
    your post showed an obvious intent at baiting an argument, and
    people properly ignored it, or 4) your post perhaps gave nothing
    for others to respond to.
    __

    This FAQ has been accepted to the *.answers newsgroups, and can be found in both sci.answers and news.answers.

    DOWNLOADING This FAQ: This is not an exhaustive list. Pick a
    site nearest you. All paths end in "sci/food-science-faq/"
    except for Gopher sites, which use menus, and FSP sites, which have
    protocols that I am unfamiliar with. FSP stands for "File Service
    Protocol". There are several other sites not mentioned here. To get
    the very latest list, look under:

    <http://tinyurl.com/7f3v7>

    Other WWW Pages with a copy of the FAQ:

    ftp://xvm-75.mit.edu/pub/usenet-by-hierarchy/sci/bio/food-science/
    http://sunsite.org.uk/public/usenet/news-faqs/
    My website: http://foodsci.info/

    __

    Professional food scientists, academics, and others involoved in the
    food industry are invited to list their "favourite", or "most highly recommended" textbooks in the food science field to be added to the FAQ
    for the benefit of non-food scientists. The following format is
    preferred for ease of editing (loosely based on the Journal of Food
    Science):

    SUBJECT: Author(Year). Title. Edition. City: Publisher. ISBN. Comments.

    The basic idea is to provide enough information for someone to walk into
    a library or bookstore and order it. The ISBN number is essential.
    Comments are optional.
    __

    You are all encouraged to contact one of us if you have suggestions
    additions, or other 'major' questions we haven't thought of. Our names
    are:

    Rachel Zemser, creator of the newsgroup sci.bio.food-science:

    J Ralph Blanchfield, Food Science, Food Technology & Food Law
    Consultant, Chair, IFST Member Relations & Services Committee and
    Web Editor, IFST Web on the WWW

    Paul King, Creator and Maintainer of the List of Common Abbreviations,
    and New User Info: sciguy@vex.net

    For a glossary of scientific, marketing, industry, technical and
    legal terms of relevance to food science, see FAQ 2 of 3. For a list
    of common questions and answers about food and food science, see
    FAQ 3 of 3.

    - Paul King








    ------- End of forwarded message -------

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)