• time to delete the science agriculture beekeeping news group

    From Charles Kroeger@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 13 22:39:12 2018
    greater minds will please give it a fare-thee-well instead of this

    Ars longa, vita brevis
    --
    CK
    beekeeper, one of the queen's helpers

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Julian Macassey@21:1/5 to charles.kroeger@gmx.com on Sat Dec 15 21:38:57 2018
    On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:39:12 -0500, Charles Kroeger
    <charles.kroeger@gmx.com> wrote:
    greater minds will please give it a fare-thee-well instead of this


    Actually, we just need more activity on this group. As
    honeybees and bumble bees decline, it is important that we
    continue nin this group.



    --
    "That's what saddens me, not that Microsoft has won, but that
    Microsoft's products don't display, er more insight and more
    creativity." - Steve Jobs 1995 TV interview

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charles Kroeger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 19 17:18:37 2018
    right...if you stay in the EU Julian I'll keep writing about bees in the S.A.beekeepers newsgroup, deal?

    --
    CK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charles Kroeger@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 28 00:51:55 2019
    Actually, we just need more activity on this group. As
    honeybees and bumble bees decline,

    yo Julian,

    after careful analysis of your statement on 15th Dec, 2018, I would add my questions to the above in a modest way, to test the suggestion to see for myself.

    a question: who or what do you think might be causing the bees to decline?
    bees have been with us for a 100 million years?

    my take on that is what's done is done and what's done cannot be
    undone as Lady Macbeth would say, but why now in the midst of all this knowledge and technology? wasn't this supposed to have ushered in a sublime new future for humankind, a signal to our gruesome past that the age of justice had arrived to the relief of what remained, of our long destructive legacy?

    another question: do you see the bees decline analogous to the canary in the coal mine for humans who have now evolved to self destruct with the believers at least all going to a better place?

    the last question: since science has pretty conclusively demonstrated that we're on our own, shouldn't every effort be made to save what's left, including of course, the bees, the subject of our newsgroup?

    --
    CK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Julian Macassey@21:1/5 to Charles Kroeger on Sun Mar 31 18:18:22 2019
    On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:51:55 -0400,
    Charles Kroeger <charles.kroeger@gmx.com> wrote:
    Actually, we just need more activity on this group. As
    honeybees and bumble bees decline,

    yo Julian,

    after careful analysis of your statement on 15th Dec, 2018, I would add my questions to the above in a modest way, to test the suggestion to see for myself.

    a question: who or what do you think might be causing the bees to decline? bees have been with us for a 100 million years?

    There are several reasons. Formost is massive use of
    insecticides which has predicatably affected all of the insect
    world. France has noticed a precipitous decline of all insects.
    Plus a change of our environment with massive use of weed killers
    killing off flowering plants that provide nectar and of course
    food for butterfly larvae. Then there is a disappearance of
    hedgerows caused by a need for larger fields. Monocropping
    removes the crop diversity needed by insects.

    Consider the oft quoted almond fertilisation. After the
    blossoms die, there is no forage for the bees so they are moved
    elsewhere. I have heard that these hives are not strong.


    my take on that is what's done is done and what's done cannot
    be undone as Lady Macbeth would say, but why now in the midst
    of all this knowledge and technology? wasn't this supposed to
    have ushered in a sublime new future for humankind, a signal to
    our gruesome past that the age of justice had arrived to the
    relief of what remained, of our long destructive legacy?

    Since the agricultural revolution, we have been told to
    welcome every change. Some have been good, many have been
    catostrophic, including contamination with heavt metals (lead
    ingasoline), pesticides like DDT etc.


    another question: do you see the bees decline analogous to the
    canary in the coal mine for humans who have now evolved to self
    destruct with the believers at least all going to a better
    place?

    Bees are one of many canaries, along with the decline of
    fish stocks, an obesity epidemic etc.



    the last question: since science has pretty conclusively
    demonstrated that we're on our own, shouldn't every effort be
    made to save what's left, including of course, the bees, the
    subject of our newsgroup?

    To quote something said by Tom McCall (Republican) on
    Earth Day in 1970: "Man has soiled his nest. Man has treated his
    environment with cavalier abandon as if it were his to have and
    to hold--as if it were within his power to make better balances
    than nature has already designed.

    We must not let this vital issue of environmental rescue
    become a cliche--talked to death before action could
    coordinated."

    Bear in mind that the above was said 49 years ago. We
    should have acted then, we didn't.



    --
    "He is divisive. He is manipulative. He is a user. He has taken
    much from me and the industry." Gary Kildall speaking of Bill Gates

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charles Kroeger@21:1/5 to thinking of myself here. who was it on Sat Apr 13 03:34:11 2019
    Foremost is massive use of
    insecticides

    all these reasons you have listed I completely agree so there isn't much I could add to your testament.

    humans have always been rapacious killers. they always overlook this fact about themselves especially if they're on top. you drink that cup. as Jesus says, this
    wine is my blood. I do not think this blood and soil connection bodes well for humans or any future they would like to imagine. who but a non believer would have a counterpoint for that? I discount the believers and their faith in something after you're dead being better than life could be in the here and now. this cult of death the believers are so enamoured with is a big let down because believe what we may, when we're dead we are quite gone and I have not heard an argument against that fact.

    therefore this thinking is so destructive in the sense it tells them the condition of the here and now is of no consequence when you consider the
    big payoff after you are 'gone' even if they have mindlessly carried out
    their biological imperative the fix is already in, so praise be to God.

    you probably have determined at this point, I do not 'believe' any of that, since we are living in the age of reason and science that knows a lot more about
    cause and effect than Jesus did when he was trying to set a good example. you would logically assume we would have advanced to embrace his concepts for
    his father's creations and all who live within, after 2000 odd years, but sin apparently doesn't fork much lightening it being so quick to be forgiven, in short Jesus (et al.) is not the answer.

    Consider the oft quoted almond fertilisation.

    the bone of efficiency, a square mile of tightly planted trees that require thousands of bees to pollinate millions of blossoms in about a week, even so the cost of a pound of almonds has already become untenable to some. I'm thinking of myself here. who was it that said we should only eat 7 almonds a day. well I would agree

    Since the agricultural revolution

    Yuval Noah Harari the Israeli historian and admired thinker (by me) seems to find the agricultural revolution has been found wanting in the balance when weighed against modern learning and scientific analysis of its effects on the progress of humans. now with its most recent variations that include agri-business production methods GMO crops (and heretofore mentioned insecticidal chemicals) made Pius by the need to feed an over populated planet (our one great collective success as a species) everything has to be sacrificed to make way for this production and growth to prevent global famine. the joke being (not a funny joke either) the environment to produce food collapses because of rising temperatures from all that agri-business and et al. green house creating businesses and solutions we have cleverly devised to make life better.

    Bees are one of many canaries,

    well..how true and getting a bit more mileage out of my biblical references herein I would say, the writing is on the wall.

    To quote something said by Tom McCall (Republican) on
    Earth Day in 1970: "Man has soiled his nest.

    you would play hell finding a republican these days that said something like that, they really believe they have a soul and in that belief they have exercised their free will to make money at all cost and so have not only squandered their own birthright, but yours and mine too.

    thus ends the lesson.

    --
    CK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charles Kroeger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 26 00:54:25 2022
    calling Julian M., come back Julian give us a report soldier. I am hunkered down in the bunker, what's your status?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)