• OT Drywall hanging

    From knuttle@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 6 11:04:30 2021
    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about
    10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed
    with long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to
    install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long
    side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. With the
    long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the
    top of the firs row and pushed into place.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net on Wed Oct 6 12:06:26 2021
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:04:30 -0400, knuttle
    <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about
    10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed
    with long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to
    install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long
    side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. With the
    long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the
    top of the firs row and pushed into place.

    It depends. How long are the walls and how big of a piece can you
    moose around? If you can deal with 10' sheets and the studs are in
    the right place, vertical is easier. If you have to rely on 8'
    sheets, I prefer horizontal. Butt joints are a PITA but you're going
    to have those either way.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to knuttle on Wed Oct 6 12:23:52 2021
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop.  The walls are about
    10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed
    with long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to
    install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long
    side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall.  With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the
    top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen of
    the other as to which is easier. Both have to be lifted off of the
    floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is shorter
    than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' lenghts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beeper@21:1/5 to Leon on Wed Oct 6 10:34:29 2021
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop.  The walls are
    about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed
    with long side horizontally.

     From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to
    install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the
    long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall.
    With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be
    lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen of
    the other as to which is easier.  Both have to be lifted off of the
    floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the end,
    it should not matter.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths.  Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is shorter
    than the sheet.  IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' lenghts.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From knuttle@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 6 14:01:47 2021
    T24gMTAvNi8yMDIxIDE6MzQgUE0sIEJlZXBlciB3cm90ZToNCj4gT24gMTAvNi8yMSAxMDoy MyBBTSwgTGVvbiB3cm90ZToNCj4+IE9uIDEwLzYvMjAyMSAxMDowNCBBTSwga251dHRsZSB3 cm90ZToNCj4+Pg0KPj4+IEkgcGxhbiB0byBmaW5pc2ggb3VyIGdhcmFnZSBhcyBhIGdhcmFn ZS93b3JrIHNob3AuwqAgVGhlIHdhbGxzIGFyZSANCj4+PiBhYm91dCAxMCBmZWV0IGhpZ2gu DQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBQYXJ0IG9mIHRoZSBnYXJhZ2UgaXMgYWxyZWFkeSBkcnkgd2FsbGVkLCBh bmQgdGhlIGRyeXdhbGwgaXMgDQo+Pj4gaW5zdGFsbGVkIHdpdGggbG9uZyBzaWRlIGhvcml6 b250YWxseS4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+IMKgRnJvbSBhIGhhbmRsaW5nIHBvaW50IG9mIHZpZXcsIGl0 IHNlZW1zIHRoYXQgaXQgd291bGQgYmUgZWFzaWVyIHRvIA0KPj4+IGluc3RhbGwgaXQgd2l0 aCB0aGUgbG9uZyBzaWRlIHZlcnRpY2FsLg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4gRG9lcyBpdCBtYWtlIGEgZGlm ZmVyZW5jZSBob3Jpem9udGFsIG9yIHZlcnRpY2FsPw0KPj4+DQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBJdCBzZWVt cyBpdCB3b3VsZCBiZSBlYXNpZXIgbGlmdGluZyB0aGUgcGFuZWxzIGludG8gcGxhY2Ugd2l0 aCB0aGUgDQo+Pj4gbG9uZyBzaWRlIHZlcnRpY2FsLCBhcyB0aGV5IGNvdWxkIGJlIHNldCBh bmQgcHVzaGVkIHVwIHRvIHRoZSB3YWxsLiANCj4+PiBXaXRoIHRoZSBsb25nIHNpZGUgaG9y aXpvbnRhbCB0aGUgMm5kIHJvdyBwaWVjZSB3b3VsZCBoYXZlIHRvIGJlIA0KPj4+IGxpZnRl ZCB0byB0aGUgdG9wIG9mIHRoZSBmaXJzIHJvdyBhbmQgcHVzaGVkIGludG8gcGxhY2UuDQo+ Pg0KPj4NCj4+IFNvIGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYSBkcnkgaW5zdGFsbGVyLCBpdCBpcyBwcm9iYWJs eSA2IG9mIG9uZSAxLzIgYSBkb3plbiBvZiANCj4+IHRoZSBvdGhlciBhcyB0byB3aGljaCBp cyBlYXNpZXIuwqAgQm90aCBoYXZlIHRvIGJlIGxpZnRlZCBvZmYgb2YgdGhlIA0KPj4gZmxv b3IgYnkgYW4gaW5jaCBvciBzbyB0byByZWFjaCB0aGUgY2VpbGluZyBzaGVldHJvY2suDQo+ IA0KPiBBbHNvIGNvbnNpZGVyIG11ZGRpbmcgYW5kIHRhcGluZy4gU29tZSBkcnl3YWxsIGlu c3RhbGxlcnMgcHJlZmVyIA0KPiBob3Jpem9udGFsIHNlYW1zIGF0IGFib3V0IDQnIHNpbXBs eSB0byBtYWtlIHRhcGluZyBlYXNpZXIuIEluIHRoZSBlbmQsIA0KPiBpdCBzaG91bGQgbm90 IG1hdHRlci4NCj4gDQo+PiBXaXRoIHRoYXQgc2FpZCBzaGVldCByb2NrIGNvbWVzIGluIHNl dmVyYWwgbGVuZ3Rocy7CoCBNb3N0IG9mdGVuIHRoZSANCj4+IGxvbmdlciB0aGFuIDgnIGxl bmd0aHMgYXJlIHBsYWNlZCBob3Jpem9udGFsbHkgaWYgdGhlIHdpbGwgaXMgc2hvcnRlciAN Cj4+IHRoYW4gdGhlIHNoZWV0LsKgIElJUkMgc2hlZXQgcm9jayBjb21lcyBpbiA4JywgMTAn LCBhbmQgMTInIGxlbmdodHMuDQo+Pg0KPj4NCj4gDQpUaGFua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBpbmZvcm1h dGlvbi4gIEZpcnN0IEkgYW0gYW4gYW1hdGV1ciwgYnV0IGhhdmUgZG9uZSBzb21lIA0KZHJ5 d2FsbCBkdXJpbmcgbXkgaGlnaCBzY2hvb2wgeWVhcnMgNjAgeWVhcnMgYWdvLg0KDQpUbyB1 c2UgMTAnIGRyeXdhbGwgcGFuZWxzIGluIHRoZSB2ZXJ0aWNhbCBwb3NpdGlvbiB3b3VsZCBy ZXF1aXJlIGV2ZXJ5IA0KcGFuZWwgdG8gYmUgY3V0IGFzIHRoZSB3YWxscyBhcmUgYSBzaGFk ZSB1bmRlciAxMCcuIDEwJyBob3Jpem9udGFsbHkgDQp3b3VsZCBiZSBnb29kIGZvciB0aGUg Zmlyc3QgY291cnNlIGxpZnRpbmcgdGhlIHNlY29uZCBjb3Vyc2UgaW50byBwbGFjZSANCnNl ZW1zIHRvIGJlIGEgcHJvYmxlbSBldmVuIGZvciBhIHlvdW5nZXIgcGVyc29uDQoNClNvIEkg d2FzIHRoaW5raW5nIG9mIDgnIHNoZWV0cyB2ZXJ0aWNhbCB3aXRoIG9uZSBjdXQgc2hlZXQg aG9yaXpvbnRhbGx5IA0KdG8gY29tcGxldGUgdGhlIHdhbGwuICBDdXR0aW5nIGFyb3VuZCB0 aGUgd2luZG93IGFuZCBkb29yIHdvdWxkIGJlIHRoZSANCnNhbWUgZWl0aGVyIHdheS4NCg==

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beeper@21:1/5 to knuttle on Wed Oct 6 11:22:43 2021
    On 10/6/21 11:01 AM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 1:34 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop.  The walls are
    about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is
    installed with long side horizontally.

     From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to
    install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the
    long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall.
    With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be
    lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen of
    the other as to which is easier.  Both have to be lifted off of the
    floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the end,
    it should not matter.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths.  Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is shorter
    than the sheet.  IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' lenghts.



    Thanks for the information.  First I am an amateur, but have done some drywall during my high school years 60 years ago.

    Well then, at your age, I salute you for tackling this yourself!

    To use 10' drywall panels in the vertical position would require every
    panel to be cut as the walls are a shade under 10'. 10' horizontally
    would be good for the first course lifting the second course into place
    seems to be a problem even for a younger person

    If you don't have a helper, consider renting a drywall hoist for ~$30-40
    per day. It may pay for itself in saved time and frustration doing it
    yourself.

    So I was thinking of 8' sheets vertical with one cut sheet horizontally
    to complete the wall.  Cutting around the window and door would be the
    same either way.

    That's your call based on your situation. Avoid any seams at the corners
    of doors and windows and be mindful of the next step; make mudding and
    taping the seams as easy as possible. Good luck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From knuttle@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 6 15:18:05 2021
    T24gMTAvNi8yMDIxIDI6MjIgUE0sIEJlZXBlciB3cm90ZToNCj4gT24gMTAvNi8yMSAxMTow MSBBTSwga251dHRsZSB3cm90ZToNCj4+IE9uIDEwLzYvMjAyMSAxOjM0IFBNLCBCZWVwZXIg d3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4gT24gMTAvNi8yMSAxMDoyMyBBTSwgTGVvbiB3cm90ZToNCj4+Pj4gT24g MTAvNi8yMDIxIDEwOjA0IEFNLCBrbnV0dGxlIHdyb3RlOg0KPj4+Pj4NCj4+Pj4+IEkgcGxh biB0byBmaW5pc2ggb3VyIGdhcmFnZSBhcyBhIGdhcmFnZS93b3JrIHNob3AuwqAgVGhlIHdh bGxzIGFyZSANCj4+Pj4+IGFib3V0IDEwIGZlZXQgaGlnaC4NCj4+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+PiBQYXJ0 IG9mIHRoZSBnYXJhZ2UgaXMgYWxyZWFkeSBkcnkgd2FsbGVkLCBhbmQgdGhlIGRyeXdhbGwg aXMgDQo+Pj4+PiBpbnN0YWxsZWQgd2l0aCBsb25nIHNpZGUgaG9yaXpvbnRhbGx5Lg0KPj4+ Pj4NCj4+Pj4+IMKgRnJvbSBhIGhhbmRsaW5nIHBvaW50IG9mIHZpZXcsIGl0IHNlZW1zIHRo YXQgaXQgd291bGQgYmUgZWFzaWVyIHRvIA0KPj4+Pj4gaW5zdGFsbCBpdCB3aXRoIHRoZSBs b25nIHNpZGUgdmVydGljYWwuDQo+Pj4+Pg0KPj4+Pj4gRG9lcyBpdCBtYWtlIGEgZGlmZmVy ZW5jZSBob3Jpem9udGFsIG9yIHZlcnRpY2FsPw0KPj4+Pj4NCj4+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+PiBJdCBz ZWVtcyBpdCB3b3VsZCBiZSBlYXNpZXIgbGlmdGluZyB0aGUgcGFuZWxzIGludG8gcGxhY2Ug d2l0aCB0aGUgDQo+Pj4+PiBsb25nIHNpZGUgdmVydGljYWwsIGFzIHRoZXkgY291bGQgYmUg c2V0IGFuZCBwdXNoZWQgdXAgdG8gdGhlIHdhbGwuIA0KPj4+Pj4gV2l0aCB0aGUgbG9uZyBz aWRlIGhvcml6b250YWwgdGhlIDJuZCByb3cgcGllY2Ugd291bGQgaGF2ZSB0byBiZSANCj4+ Pj4+IGxpZnRlZCB0byB0aGUgdG9wIG9mIHRoZSBmaXJzIHJvdyBhbmQgcHVzaGVkIGludG8g cGxhY2UuDQo+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+IFNvIGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYSBkcnkgaW5zdGFsbGVy LCBpdCBpcyBwcm9iYWJseSA2IG9mIG9uZSAxLzIgYSBkb3plbiANCj4+Pj4gb2YgdGhlIG90 aGVyIGFzIHRvIHdoaWNoIGlzIGVhc2llci7CoCBCb3RoIGhhdmUgdG8gYmUgbGlmdGVkIG9m ZiBvZiANCj4+Pj4gdGhlIGZsb29yIGJ5IGFuIGluY2ggb3Igc28gdG8gcmVhY2ggdGhlIGNl aWxpbmcgc2hlZXRyb2NrLg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4gQWxzbyBjb25zaWRlciBtdWRkaW5nIGFuZCB0 YXBpbmcuIFNvbWUgZHJ5d2FsbCBpbnN0YWxsZXJzIHByZWZlciANCj4+PiBob3Jpem9udGFs IHNlYW1zIGF0IGFib3V0IDQnIHNpbXBseSB0byBtYWtlIHRhcGluZyBlYXNpZXIuIEluIHRo ZSANCj4+PiBlbmQsIGl0IHNob3VsZCBub3QgbWF0dGVyLg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4+IFdpdGggdGhh dCBzYWlkIHNoZWV0IHJvY2sgY29tZXMgaW4gc2V2ZXJhbCBsZW5ndGhzLsKgIE1vc3Qgb2Z0 ZW4gdGhlIA0KPj4+PiBsb25nZXIgdGhhbiA4JyBsZW5ndGhzIGFyZSBwbGFjZWQgaG9yaXpv bnRhbGx5IGlmIHRoZSB3aWxsIGlzIA0KPj4+PiBzaG9ydGVyIHRoYW4gdGhlIHNoZWV0LsKg IElJUkMgc2hlZXQgcm9jayBjb21lcyBpbiA4JywgMTAnLCBhbmQgMTInIA0KPj4+PiBsZW5n aHRzLg0KPj4+Pg0KPj4+Pg0KPj4+DQo+PiBUaGFua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbi7C oCBGaXJzdCBJIGFtIGFuIGFtYXRldXIsIGJ1dCBoYXZlIGRvbmUgc29tZSANCj4+IGRyeXdh bGwgZHVyaW5nIG15IGhpZ2ggc2Nob29sIHllYXJzIDYwIHllYXJzIGFnby4NCj4gDQo+IFdl bGwgdGhlbiwgYXQgeW91ciBhZ2UsIEkgc2FsdXRlIHlvdSBmb3IgdGFja2xpbmcgdGhpcyB5 b3Vyc2VsZiENCj4gDQo+PiBUbyB1c2UgMTAnIGRyeXdhbGwgcGFuZWxzIGluIHRoZSB2ZXJ0 aWNhbCBwb3NpdGlvbiB3b3VsZCByZXF1aXJlIGV2ZXJ5IA0KPj4gcGFuZWwgdG8gYmUgY3V0 IGFzIHRoZSB3YWxscyBhcmUgYSBzaGFkZSB1bmRlciAxMCcuIDEwJyBob3Jpem9udGFsbHkg DQo+PiB3b3VsZCBiZSBnb29kIGZvciB0aGUgZmlyc3QgY291cnNlIGxpZnRpbmcgdGhlIHNl Y29uZCBjb3Vyc2UgaW50byANCj4+IHBsYWNlIHNlZW1zIHRvIGJlIGEgcHJvYmxlbSBldmVu IGZvciBhIHlvdW5nZXIgcGVyc29uDQo+IA0KPiBJZiB5b3UgZG9uJ3QgaGF2ZSBhIGhlbHBl ciwgY29uc2lkZXIgcmVudGluZyBhIGRyeXdhbGwgaG9pc3QgZm9yIH4kMzAtNDAgDQo+IHBl ciBkYXkuIEl0IG1heSBwYXkgZm9yIGl0c2VsZiBpbiBzYXZlZCB0aW1lIGFuZCBmcnVzdHJh dGlvbiBkb2luZyBpdCANCj4geW91cnNlbGYuDQo+IA0KPj4gU28gSSB3YXMgdGhpbmtpbmcg b2YgOCcgc2hlZXRzIHZlcnRpY2FsIHdpdGggb25lIGN1dCBzaGVldCANCj4+IGhvcml6b250 YWxseSB0byBjb21wbGV0ZSB0aGUgd2FsbC7CoCBDdXR0aW5nIGFyb3VuZCB0aGUgd2luZG93 IGFuZCBkb29yIA0KPj4gd291bGQgYmUgdGhlIHNhbWUgZWl0aGVyIHdheS4NCj4gDQo+IFRo YXQncyB5b3VyIGNhbGwgYmFzZWQgb24geW91ciBzaXR1YXRpb24uIEF2b2lkIGFueSBzZWFt cyBhdCB0aGUgY29ybmVycyANCj4gb2YgZG9vcnMgYW5kIHdpbmRvd3MgYW5kIGJlIG1pbmRm dWwgb2YgdGhlIG5leHQgc3RlcDsgbWFrZSBtdWRkaW5nIGFuZCANCj4gdGFwaW5nIHRoZSBz ZWFtcyBhcyBlYXN5IGFzIHBvc3NpYmxlLiBHb29kIGx1Y2suDQpQbGVhc2UgZXhwbGFpbiAi QXZvaWQgYW55IHNlYW1zIGF0IHRoZSBjb3JuZXJzIG9mIGRvb3JzIGFuZCB3aW5kb3dzIg0K DQpTaG91bGQgYWxsIHRoZSB3aW5kb3cvZG9vciBjb3JuZXJzIGJlIGN1dCBmcm9tIGEgc2lu Z2xlIHBhbmVsIG9yIGlzIGl0IA0KT0sgdG8gcnVuIGEgcGFuZWwgdXAgYWxvbmcgdGhlIHdp bmRvdyBhbmQgYSBwaWVjZSBvdmVyIHRoZSB3aW5kb3cgd2l0aCANCnNlYW0gY29udGludWlu ZyBmcm9tIHRoZSB0b3Agb2YgaGUgd2luZG93IHRvIHRoZSBjZWlsaW5nPw0K

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hubops@ccanoemail.ca@21:1/5 to keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net on Wed Oct 6 15:44:43 2021
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:18:05 -0400, knuttle
    <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/6/2021 2:22 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 11:01 AM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 1:34 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are
    about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is
    installed with long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to >>>>>> install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the >>>>>> long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. >>>>>> With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be
    lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen
    of the other as to which is easier. Both have to be lifted off of
    the floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the
    end, it should not matter.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is
    shorter than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12'
    lenghts.



    Thanks for the information. First I am an amateur, but have done some
    drywall during my high school years 60 years ago.

    Well then, at your age, I salute you for tackling this yourself!

    To use 10' drywall panels in the vertical position would require every
    panel to be cut as the walls are a shade under 10'. 10' horizontally
    would be good for the first course lifting the second course into
    place seems to be a problem even for a younger person

    If you don't have a helper, consider renting a drywall hoist for ~$30-40
    per day. It may pay for itself in saved time and frustration doing it
    yourself.

    So I was thinking of 8' sheets vertical with one cut sheet
    horizontally to complete the wall. Cutting around the window and door
    would be the same either way.

    That's your call based on your situation. Avoid any seams at the corners
    of doors and windows and be mindful of the next step; make mudding and
    taping the seams as easy as possible. Good luck.
    Please explain "Avoid any seams at the corners of doors and windows"

    Should all the window/door corners be cut from a single panel or is it
    OK to run a panel up along the window and a piece over the window with
    seam continuing from the top of he window to the ceiling?


    just 1 link - below - a google search reveals
    umteen hits and youtube videos - you name it.

    https://www.renovation-headquarters.com/drywall-installation-openings.htmlx

    John T.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beeper@21:1/5 to knuttle on Wed Oct 6 12:45:46 2021
    On 10/6/21 12:18 PM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 2:22 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 11:01 AM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 1:34 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop.  The walls are >>>>>> about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is
    installed with long side horizontally.

     From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier
    to install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the >>>>>> long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the
    wall. With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have
    to be lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen
    of the other as to which is easier.  Both have to be lifted off of
    the floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the
    end, it should not matter.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths.  Most often the >>>>> longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is
    shorter than the sheet.  IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12'
    lenghts.



    Thanks for the information.  First I am an amateur, but have done
    some drywall during my high school years 60 years ago.

    Well then, at your age, I salute you for tackling this yourself!

    To use 10' drywall panels in the vertical position would require
    every panel to be cut as the walls are a shade under 10'. 10'
    horizontally would be good for the first course lifting the second
    course into place seems to be a problem even for a younger person

    If you don't have a helper, consider renting a drywall hoist for
    ~$30-40 per day. It may pay for itself in saved time and frustration
    doing it yourself.

    So I was thinking of 8' sheets vertical with one cut sheet
    horizontally to complete the wall.  Cutting around the window and
    door would be the same either way.

    That's your call based on your situation. Avoid any seams at the
    corners of doors and windows and be mindful of the next step; make
    mudding and taping the seams as easy as possible. Good luck.
    Please explain "Avoid any seams at the corners of doors and windows"

    Should all the window/door corners be cut from a single panel or is it
    OK to run a panel up along the window and a piece over the window with
    seam continuing from the top of he window to the ceiling?

    When placing drywall, I try to create a vertical seam mid-span above, or
    a horizontal seam mid-span on either side of a door or window. I find
    that seams directly intersecting corners of openings tend to crack more.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DerbyDad03@21:1/5 to keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net on Wed Oct 6 12:54:38 2021
    On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 3:18:09 PM UTC-4, keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 2:22 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 11:01 AM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 1:34 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are
    about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is
    installed with long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to >>>>> install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the >>>>> long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. >>>>> With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be
    lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen
    of the other as to which is easier. Both have to be lifted off of
    the floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the
    end, it should not matter.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is
    shorter than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12'
    lenghts.



    Thanks for the information. First I am an amateur, but have done some
    drywall during my high school years 60 years ago.

    Well then, at your age, I salute you for tackling this yourself!

    To use 10' drywall panels in the vertical position would require every
    panel to be cut as the walls are a shade under 10'. 10' horizontally
    would be good for the first course lifting the second course into
    place seems to be a problem even for a younger person

    If you don't have a helper, consider renting a drywall hoist for ~$30-40 per day. It may pay for itself in saved time and frustration doing it yourself.

    So I was thinking of 8' sheets vertical with one cut sheet
    horizontally to complete the wall. Cutting around the window and door
    would be the same either way.

    That's your call based on your situation. Avoid any seams at the corners
    of doors and windows and be mindful of the next step; make mudding and taping the seams as easy as possible. Good luck.
    Please explain "Avoid any seams at the corners of doors and windows"

    Should all the window/door corners be cut from a single panel or is it
    OK to run a panel up along the window and a piece over the window with
    seam continuing from the top of he window to the ceiling?

    That's exactly what you *don't* want to do. The area above the corners of doors and windows can settle/shift and your seams may crack.

    One method is this. The seam is below the corner and is less likely to crack:

    https://buyersask.com/wp-content/uploads/Drywall-corner_112777483-Copy-250x108.jpg

    Another method. Here the seam is over the center of the window.

    https://www.jlconline.com/how-to/interiors/installing-drywall-around-windows-and-doors_o

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From knuttle@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 6 16:48:36 2021
    T24gMTAvNi8yMDIxIDM6NDQgUE0sIGh1Ym9wc0BjY2Fub2VtYWlsLmNhIHdyb3RlOg0KPiBP biBXZWQsIDYgT2N0IDIwMjEgMTU6MTg6MDUgLTA0MDAsIGtudXR0bGUNCj4gPGtlaXRoX251 dHRsZUBzYmNnbG9iYWwubmV0PiB3cm90ZToNCj4gDQo+PiBPbiAxMC82LzIwMjEgMjoyMiBQ TSwgQmVlcGVyIHdyb3RlOg0KPj4+IE9uIDEwLzYvMjEgMTE6MDEgQU0sIGtudXR0bGUgd3Jv dGU6DQo+Pj4+IE9uIDEwLzYvMjAyMSAxOjM0IFBNLCBCZWVwZXIgd3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4+PiBP biAxMC82LzIxIDEwOjIzIEFNLCBMZW9uIHdyb3RlOg0KPj4+Pj4+IE9uIDEwLzYvMjAyMSAx MDowNCBBTSwga251dHRsZSB3cm90ZToNCj4+Pj4+Pj4NCj4+Pj4+Pj4gSSBwbGFuIHRvIGZp bmlzaCBvdXIgZ2FyYWdlIGFzIGEgZ2FyYWdlL3dvcmsgc2hvcC7CoCBUaGUgd2FsbHMgYXJl DQo+Pj4+Pj4+IGFib3V0IDEwIGZlZXQgaGlnaC4NCj4+Pj4+Pj4NCj4+Pj4+Pj4gUGFydCBv ZiB0aGUgZ2FyYWdlIGlzIGFscmVhZHkgZHJ5IHdhbGxlZCwgYW5kIHRoZSBkcnl3YWxsIGlz DQo+Pj4+Pj4+IGluc3RhbGxlZCB3aXRoIGxvbmcgc2lkZSBob3Jpem9udGFsbHkuDQo+Pj4+ Pj4+DQo+Pj4+Pj4+ICDCoEZyb20gYSBoYW5kbGluZyBwb2ludCBvZiB2aWV3LCBpdCBzZWVt cyB0aGF0IGl0IHdvdWxkIGJlIGVhc2llciB0bw0KPj4+Pj4+PiBpbnN0YWxsIGl0IHdpdGgg dGhlIGxvbmcgc2lkZSB2ZXJ0aWNhbC4NCj4+Pj4+Pj4NCj4+Pj4+Pj4gRG9lcyBpdCBtYWtl IGEgZGlmZmVyZW5jZSBob3Jpem9udGFsIG9yIHZlcnRpY2FsPw0KPj4+Pj4+Pg0KPj4+Pj4+ Pg0KPj4+Pj4+PiBJdCBzZWVtcyBpdCB3b3VsZCBiZSBlYXNpZXIgbGlmdGluZyB0aGUgcGFu ZWxzIGludG8gcGxhY2Ugd2l0aCB0aGUNCj4+Pj4+Pj4gbG9uZyBzaWRlIHZlcnRpY2FsLCBh cyB0aGV5IGNvdWxkIGJlIHNldCBhbmQgcHVzaGVkIHVwIHRvIHRoZSB3YWxsLg0KPj4+Pj4+ PiBXaXRoIHRoZSBsb25nIHNpZGUgaG9yaXpvbnRhbCB0aGUgMm5kIHJvdyBwaWVjZSB3b3Vs ZCBoYXZlIHRvIGJlDQo+Pj4+Pj4+IGxpZnRlZCB0byB0aGUgdG9wIG9mIHRoZSBmaXJzIHJv dyBhbmQgcHVzaGVkIGludG8gcGxhY2UuDQo+Pj4+Pj4NCj4+Pj4+Pg0KPj4+Pj4+IFNvIGlm IHlvdSBhcmUgYSBkcnkgaW5zdGFsbGVyLCBpdCBpcyBwcm9iYWJseSA2IG9mIG9uZSAxLzIg YSBkb3plbg0KPj4+Pj4+IG9mIHRoZSBvdGhlciBhcyB0byB3aGljaCBpcyBlYXNpZXIuwqAg Qm90aCBoYXZlIHRvIGJlIGxpZnRlZCBvZmYgb2YNCj4+Pj4+PiB0aGUgZmxvb3IgYnkgYW4g aW5jaCBvciBzbyB0byByZWFjaCB0aGUgY2VpbGluZyBzaGVldHJvY2suDQo+Pj4+Pg0KPj4+ Pj4gQWxzbyBjb25zaWRlciBtdWRkaW5nIGFuZCB0YXBpbmcuIFNvbWUgZHJ5d2FsbCBpbnN0 YWxsZXJzIHByZWZlcg0KPj4+Pj4gaG9yaXpvbnRhbCBzZWFtcyBhdCBhYm91dCA0JyBzaW1w bHkgdG8gbWFrZSB0YXBpbmcgZWFzaWVyLiBJbiB0aGUNCj4+Pj4+IGVuZCwgaXQgc2hvdWxk IG5vdCBtYXR0ZXIuDQo+Pj4+Pg0KPj4+Pj4+IFdpdGggdGhhdCBzYWlkIHNoZWV0IHJvY2sg Y29tZXMgaW4gc2V2ZXJhbCBsZW5ndGhzLsKgIE1vc3Qgb2Z0ZW4gdGhlDQo+Pj4+Pj4gbG9u Z2VyIHRoYW4gOCcgbGVuZ3RocyBhcmUgcGxhY2VkIGhvcml6b250YWxseSBpZiB0aGUgd2ls bCBpcw0KPj4+Pj4+IHNob3J0ZXIgdGhhbiB0aGUgc2hlZXQuwqAgSUlSQyBzaGVldCByb2Nr IGNvbWVzIGluIDgnLCAxMCcsIGFuZCAxMicNCj4+Pj4+PiBsZW5naHRzLg0KPj4+Pj4+DQo+ Pj4+Pj4NCj4+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+IFRoYW5rcyBmb3IgdGhlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uLsKgIEZpcnN0 IEkgYW0gYW4gYW1hdGV1ciwgYnV0IGhhdmUgZG9uZSBzb21lDQo+Pj4+IGRyeXdhbGwgZHVy aW5nIG15IGhpZ2ggc2Nob29sIHllYXJzIDYwIHllYXJzIGFnby4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+IFdlbGwg dGhlbiwgYXQgeW91ciBhZ2UsIEkgc2FsdXRlIHlvdSBmb3IgdGFja2xpbmcgdGhpcyB5b3Vy c2VsZiENCj4+Pg0KPj4+PiBUbyB1c2UgMTAnIGRyeXdhbGwgcGFuZWxzIGluIHRoZSB2ZXJ0 aWNhbCBwb3NpdGlvbiB3b3VsZCByZXF1aXJlIGV2ZXJ5DQo+Pj4+IHBhbmVsIHRvIGJlIGN1 dCBhcyB0aGUgd2FsbHMgYXJlIGEgc2hhZGUgdW5kZXIgMTAnLiAxMCcgaG9yaXpvbnRhbGx5 DQo+Pj4+IHdvdWxkIGJlIGdvb2QgZm9yIHRoZSBmaXJzdCBjb3Vyc2UgbGlmdGluZyB0aGUg c2Vjb25kIGNvdXJzZSBpbnRvDQo+Pj4+IHBsYWNlIHNlZW1zIHRvIGJlIGEgcHJvYmxlbSBl dmVuIGZvciBhIHlvdW5nZXIgcGVyc29uDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBJZiB5b3UgZG9uJ3QgaGF2ZSBh IGhlbHBlciwgY29uc2lkZXIgcmVudGluZyBhIGRyeXdhbGwgaG9pc3QgZm9yIH4kMzAtNDAN Cj4+PiBwZXIgZGF5LiBJdCBtYXkgcGF5IGZvciBpdHNlbGYgaW4gc2F2ZWQgdGltZSBhbmQg ZnJ1c3RyYXRpb24gZG9pbmcgaXQNCj4+PiB5b3Vyc2VsZi4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+PiBTbyBJIHdh cyB0aGlua2luZyBvZiA4JyBzaGVldHMgdmVydGljYWwgd2l0aCBvbmUgY3V0IHNoZWV0DQo+ Pj4+IGhvcml6b250YWxseSB0byBjb21wbGV0ZSB0aGUgd2FsbC7CoCBDdXR0aW5nIGFyb3Vu ZCB0aGUgd2luZG93IGFuZCBkb29yDQo+Pj4+IHdvdWxkIGJlIHRoZSBzYW1lIGVpdGhlciB3 YXkuDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBUaGF0J3MgeW91ciBjYWxsIGJhc2VkIG9uIHlvdXIgc2l0dWF0aW9u LiBBdm9pZCBhbnkgc2VhbXMgYXQgdGhlIGNvcm5lcnMNCj4+PiBvZiBkb29ycyBhbmQgd2lu ZG93cyBhbmQgYmUgbWluZGZ1bCBvZiB0aGUgbmV4dCBzdGVwOyBtYWtlIG11ZGRpbmcgYW5k DQo+Pj4gdGFwaW5nIHRoZSBzZWFtcyBhcyBlYXN5IGFzIHBvc3NpYmxlLiBHb29kIGx1Y2su DQo+PiBQbGVhc2UgZXhwbGFpbiAiQXZvaWQgYW55IHNlYW1zIGF0IHRoZSBjb3JuZXJzIG9m IGRvb3JzIGFuZCB3aW5kb3dzIg0KPj4NCj4+IFNob3VsZCBhbGwgdGhlIHdpbmRvdy9kb29y IGNvcm5lcnMgYmUgY3V0IGZyb20gYSBzaW5nbGUgcGFuZWwgb3IgaXMgaXQNCj4+IE9LIHRv IHJ1biBhIHBhbmVsIHVwIGFsb25nIHRoZSB3aW5kb3cgYW5kIGEgcGllY2Ugb3ZlciB0aGUg d2luZG93IHdpdGgNCj4+IHNlYW0gY29udGludWluZyBmcm9tIHRoZSB0b3Agb2YgaGUgd2lu ZG93IHRvIHRoZSBjZWlsaW5nPw0KPiANCj4gDQo+IGp1c3QgMSBsaW5rICAgLSAgIGJlbG93 ICAgIC0gICAgYSBnb29nbGUgc2VhcmNoIHJldmVhbHMNCj4gICB1bXRlZW4gaGl0cyBhbmQg eW91dHViZSB2aWRlb3MgIC0gIHlvdSBuYW1lIGl0Lg0KPiANCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmVu b3ZhdGlvbi1oZWFkcXVhcnRlcnMuY29tL2RyeXdhbGwtaW5zdGFsbGF0aW9uLW9wZW5pbmdz Lmh0bWx4DQo+IA0KPiAgICAgSm9obiBULg0KPiANCkkgYXNrZWQgaGVyZSBpbnN0ZWFkIG9m IHdoYXQgSSBmb3VuZCBvbiBHb29nbGUgYXMgSSBoYWQgc3BlY2lmaWMgDQpxdWVzdGlvbiBh Ym91dCBoYW5naW5nIGRyeSB3YWxsLiAgVGhlIHZpZGVvIHNlZW0gdG8gYWx3YXlzIGdpdmUg Z2VuZXJhbCANCmluZm9ybWF0aW9uLg0KDQpBZ2FpbiB0aGFuayB5b3UgYWxsIGZvciB0aGUg aW5mb3JtYXRpb24uDQoNCg0K

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hubops@ccanoemail.ca@21:1/5 to keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net on Wed Oct 6 17:36:32 2021
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 16:48:36 -0400, knuttle
    <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/6/2021 3:44 PM, hubops@ccanoemail.ca wrote:
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:18:05 -0400, knuttle
    <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/6/2021 2:22 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 11:01 AM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 1:34 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are >>>>>>>> about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is
    installed with long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to >>>>>>>> install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the >>>>>>>> long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. >>>>>>>> With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be >>>>>>>> lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen >>>>>>> of the other as to which is easier. Both have to be lifted off of >>>>>>> the floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the
    end, it should not matter.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the >>>>>>> longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is
    shorter than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' >>>>>>> lenghts.



    Thanks for the information. First I am an amateur, but have done some >>>>> drywall during my high school years 60 years ago.

    Well then, at your age, I salute you for tackling this yourself!

    To use 10' drywall panels in the vertical position would require every >>>>> panel to be cut as the walls are a shade under 10'. 10' horizontally >>>>> would be good for the first course lifting the second course into
    place seems to be a problem even for a younger person

    If you don't have a helper, consider renting a drywall hoist for ~$30-40 >>>> per day. It may pay for itself in saved time and frustration doing it
    yourself.

    So I was thinking of 8' sheets vertical with one cut sheet
    horizontally to complete the wall. Cutting around the window and door >>>>> would be the same either way.

    That's your call based on your situation. Avoid any seams at the corners >>>> of doors and windows and be mindful of the next step; make mudding and >>>> taping the seams as easy as possible. Good luck.
    Please explain "Avoid any seams at the corners of doors and windows"

    Should all the window/door corners be cut from a single panel or is it
    OK to run a panel up along the window and a piece over the window with
    seam continuing from the top of he window to the ceiling?


    just 1 link - below - a google search reveals
    umteen hits and youtube videos - you name it.

    https://www.renovation-headquarters.com/drywall-installation-openings.htmlx >>
    John T.

    I asked here instead of what I found on Google as I had specific
    question about hanging dry wall. The video seem to always give general >information.

    Again thank you all for the information.



    Glad that you found all your answers.
    The link that I posted was concerning the question about
    door/window openings and it showed 2 simple
    illustrations - Wrong & Right.
    A different web site that I looked at showed where to
    put the drywall screws around the openings and -
    - something that was news-to-me - where NOT to screw.
    John T.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to Beeper on Wed Oct 6 18:01:40 2021
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:22:43 -0700, Beeper <beeper@acme.com> wrote:

    On 10/6/21 11:01 AM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 1:34 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are
    about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is
    installed with long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to
    install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the
    long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall.
    With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be
    lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen of
    the other as to which is easier. Both have to be lifted off of the
    floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the end,
    it should not matter.

    One thing to think about is the sight line. Hung horizontally, you
    may see the joint because you're looking right down it's length. Avoid
    the seam at eye level (2' panel on the bottom) or you will see it no
    matter how good the taping is.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is shorter
    than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' lenghts.



    Thanks for the information. First I am an amateur, but have done some
    drywall during my high school years 60 years ago.

    Well then, at your age, I salute you for tackling this yourself!

    To use 10' drywall panels in the vertical position would require every
    panel to be cut as the walls are a shade under 10'. 10' horizontally
    would be good for the first course lifting the second course into place
    seems to be a problem even for a younger person

    If you don't have a helper, consider renting a drywall hoist for ~$30-40
    per day. It may pay for itself in saved time and frustration doing it >yourself.

    Since you're doing it yourself, I'm sure a day or two isn't going to
    cut it. BTDT. I bought a lift quite some time ago but they've gotten
    a lot more expensive, apparently:

    <https://www.harborfreight.com/search?q=drywall%20hoist>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to knuttle on Wed Oct 6 21:30:41 2021
    "knuttle" wrote in message news:sjkdtu$7mb$1@dont-email.me...

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about 10 >feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed with >long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to install
    it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    Regarding your question. From a structural standpoint no. However, generally you have fewer linear feet to tape with horizontal hanging but not always.

    Me... I've hung and taped a fair amount of drywall. In your case I'd
    probably hang 4'x12' sheets horizontally. Start with 4' widths at the top
    and put the nominal 2' at the bottom. If you are working alone you can
    hang the upper sheets using a panel lift--they aren't just for ceilings! You can reach the horizontal joints fairly easy at those heights for taping and there is less taping to do.

    Depending on where the door(s) are located you might be able to avoid having
    to tape at least some butt joints.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net on Wed Oct 6 23:34:59 2021
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:18:05 -0400, knuttle
    <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/6/2021 2:22 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 11:01 AM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 1:34 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are
    about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is
    installed with long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to >>>>>> install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the >>>>>> long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. >>>>>> With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be
    lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen
    of the other as to which is easier. Both have to be lifted off of
    the floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the
    end, it should not matter.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is
    shorter than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12'
    lenghts.



    Thanks for the information. First I am an amateur, but have done some
    drywall during my high school years 60 years ago.

    Well then, at your age, I salute you for tackling this yourself!

    To use 10' drywall panels in the vertical position would require every
    panel to be cut as the walls are a shade under 10'. 10' horizontally
    would be good for the first course lifting the second course into
    place seems to be a problem even for a younger person

    If you don't have a helper, consider renting a drywall hoist for ~$30-40
    per day. It may pay for itself in saved time and frustration doing it
    yourself.

    So I was thinking of 8' sheets vertical with one cut sheet
    horizontally to complete the wall. Cutting around the window and door
    would be the same either way.

    That's your call based on your situation. Avoid any seams at the corners
    of doors and windows and be mindful of the next step; make mudding and
    taping the seams as easy as possible. Good luck.
    Please explain "Avoid any seams at the corners of doors and windows"

    Should all the window/door corners be cut from a single panel or is it
    OK to run a panel up along the window and a piece over the window with
    seam continuing from the top of he window to the ceiling?
    That is to be avoided if possible - better to have the vertical seam
    centered over the door. Horrizintal sheets mean only a small amount of
    waste cut out of the bottom of the top sheet, then the next 2 layers
    have no waste for doors. Never have a joint that is unsupported, and
    try to avoid joints at inside corners - like a door or window top
    corner or window bottom corner for best crack resistance.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net on Wed Oct 6 23:29:26 2021
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:01:47 -0400, knuttle
    <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/6/2021 1:34 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are
    about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is
    installed with long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to
    install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the
    long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall.
    With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be
    lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen of
    the other as to which is easier. Both have to be lifted off of the
    floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the end,
    it should not matter.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is shorter
    than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' lenghts.



    Thanks for the information. First I am an amateur, but have done some >drywall during my high school years 60 years ago.

    To use 10' drywall panels in the vertical position would require every
    panel to be cut as the walls are a shade under 10'. 10' horizontally
    would be good for the first course lifting the second course into place
    seems to be a problem even for a younger person

    So I was thinking of 8' sheets vertical with one cut sheet horizontally
    to complete the wall. Cutting around the window and door would be the
    same either way.
    Do yourself a favour - lay it horisontal. 2 man job - but make or
    rent a "llift" - it can be as simple as a set of "ramps" made of 2X4s
    against the wall with a 2X4 between them to rest the sheet on at the
    right hight to hold the sheet pretty well to the ceiling -use a wide
    bar to hold to the desired heigt then screw into place - top sheet
    first all around the garage. When the top is all done re-work the ramp
    to fit the second sheet - staggering the vertical joints - then cut
    the bottom sheet and pry it into place. withthe required bottom gap.
    Horizontal lines are easier to mud and less conspicuous. Short
    vericals are easier than full height

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Wed Oct 6 23:45:06 2021
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 21:30:41 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    "knuttle" wrote in message news:sjkdtu$7mb$1@dont-email.me...

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about 10 >>feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed with >>long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to install >>it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    Regarding your question. From a structural standpoint no. However, generally >you have fewer linear feet to tape with horizontal hanging but not always.

    Me... I've hung and taped a fair amount of drywall. In your case I'd
    probably hang 4'x12' sheets horizontally. Start with 4' widths at the top
    and put the nominal 2' at the bottom. If you are working alone you can
    hang the upper sheets using a panel lift--they aren't just for ceilings! You >can reach the horizontal joints fairly easy at those heights for taping and >there is less taping to do.

    Depending on where the door(s) are located you might be able to avoid having >to tape at least some butt joints.



    It''s not very common to have more than 8 or 10 feet between corners
    and windows or doors so in MOST cases there is no vertical joint in
    the "eye level" panets when mounting horizontal. If there is, a
    staggered vertical joint is not terribly visible. A full height
    vertical joint every 4 feet is a royal B---h to hide - - . Making the
    joints -if required - on the upper course cantered above doors or
    windows makes for a nice short vertical seam and the sides of the
    windows draw your eye away from the joint -= and it is unusual to
    require more than one joint in ther upper course even using the
    readily available 8 foot sheets (most walls are under 16 feet long)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From William Ahern@21:1/5 to John Grossbohlin on Wed Oct 6 22:57:29 2021
    John Grossbohlin <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:
    "knuttle" wrote in message news:sjkdtu$7mb$1@dont-email.me...

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about 10 >>feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed with >>long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to install >>it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    Regarding your question. From a structural standpoint no.

    Drywall can work as a shear wall for earthquake reinforcement. Specific
    types of plywood are normally used in proper retrofits, but AFAIU drywall
    can work well enough depending on the requirements and the drywall specs.

    For plywood shear walls, horizontal panels are preferred, even where you can fit full, evenly spaced panels in either direction. The experimental
    evidence (the specifics of which I forget) is much weaker than the
    rationales contractors give, but the evidence still slightly favors
    horizontal placement. My neighbor retrofit his first floor a year after I
    did and boasted (based on his contractor's feel-good BS) that his panels
    were placed horizontal, unlike mine which were placed vertical. In our situations it almost certainly didn't matter. Rather I'm sure placement was
    in actuality dictated by which was easier and cheaper for the contractor.
    But *technically* I felt bound to concede his point and nod my head.

    At least as important as the drywall specs, and definitely more important
    than direction, would be the fastener type, spec, and placement. For plywood retrofit shearwalls, screws are considered a conspicuous sign of shoddy
    work. But I'm sure screws could still be used as long as they met the right specs; screws just aren't as fool- and defect-proof as nails. Maybe the
    reverse is true for drywall, with screws making it easier to achieve maximum benefit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill@21:1/5 to Clare Snyder on Thu Oct 7 01:56:09 2021
    On 10/6/2021 11:29 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:01:47 -0400, knuttle
    <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/6/2021 1:34 PM, Beeper wrote:
    On 10/6/21 10:23 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 10:04 AM, knuttle wrote:

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop.  The walls are
    about 10 feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is
    installed with long side horizontally.

     From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to >>>>> install it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?


    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the
    long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall.
    With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be
    lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    So if you are a dry installer, it is probably 6 of one 1/2 a dozen of
    the other as to which is easier.  Both have to be lifted off of the
    floor by an inch or so to reach the ceiling sheetrock.

    Also consider mudding and taping. Some drywall installers prefer
    horizontal seams at about 4' simply to make taping easier. In the end,
    it should not matter.

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths.  Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is shorter
    than the sheet.  IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' lenghts.



    Thanks for the information. First I am an amateur, but have done some
    drywall during my high school years 60 years ago.

    To use 10' drywall panels in the vertical position would require every
    panel to be cut as the walls are a shade under 10'. 10' horizontally
    would be good for the first course lifting the second course into place
    seems to be a problem even for a younger person

    So I was thinking of 8' sheets vertical with one cut sheet horizontally
    to complete the wall. Cutting around the window and door would be the
    same either way.
    Do yourself a favour - lay it horisontal. 2 man job - but make or
    rent a "llift" - it can be as simple as a set of "ramps" made of 2X4s
    against the wall with a 2X4 between them to rest the sheet on at the
    right hight to hold the sheet pretty well to the ceiling -use a wide
    bar to hold to the desired heigt then screw into place - top sheet
    first all around the garage. When the top is all done re-work the ramp
    to fit the second sheet - staggering the vertical joints - then cut
    the bottom sheet and pry it into place. withthe required bottom gap. Horizontal lines are easier to mud and less conspicuous. Short
    vericals are easier than full height


    While, you're on that topic, I thought I would mention that as a
    beginner myself, I found my inexpensive 500W halogen light very helpful
    in pointing out to me where my joints required more work (sanding or
    other). The shadows show up in a big way! The technique easily found
    issues that I would have otherwise encountered while I was painting, and
    it was too late to do much about it. I may have got that suggestion
    here (if not, I got it from YouTube or from something I read, because I
    know I didn't come up with it on my own!). You may be amazed what it
    finds for you, and after using the light, you'll know exactly where you stand--with no need to guess or hope!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tcrist@yahoo.com@21:1/5 to keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net on Thu Oct 7 04:56:42 2021
    On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 11:04:33 AM UTC-4, keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net wrote:

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long
    side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. With the
    long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the
    top of the firs row and pushed into place.


    1. Drywall the ceiling.
    2. The first sheet for the wall should be placed up tight to the ceiling. This makes a tight joint with a tapered edge for taping and helps support the ceiling sheet.
    3. The next sheet goes under the first. For an 8' wall that's it. The inch or so at the bottom will be covered by trim. For a 10' wall you'll have to decide if you want a 2' "patch" in the middle or at the bottom. Middle is easier to work on to feather
    out, bottom may be less noticeable. In a workshop it probably doesn't matter.

    Horizontal or vertical is up to you. It may make a difference on how many joints you have to deal with especially (untapered) butt joints. In home construction, many rooms can be finished with 10 or 12 foot sheets covering a full wall and eliminating
    the butt joints.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave in SoTex@21:1/5 to Beeper on Thu Oct 7 07:55:37 2021
    On 10/6/2021 12:34 PM, Beeper wrote:

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths.  Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is shorter
    than the sheet.  IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' lenghts.

    Tearing out wet drywall after Tropical Storm Allison dropped up to 24 inches of rain [IIRC] in 24 hours, flooded hundreds/thousands of Houston
    area homes in 2002 we quickly realized that horizontally installed
    drywall made for a convenient height/break for tear-out and replacement
    of full sheets. Highest waterline of the five houses we repaired was 31
    or 32 inches. It definitely moved the time line for tear-out and dry-out.

    Dave in SoTex

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to William Ahern on Thu Oct 7 08:14:25 2021
    On 10/7/2021 12:57 AM, William Ahern wrote:
    John Grossbohlin <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:
    "knuttle" wrote in message news:sjkdtu$7mb$1@dont-email.me...

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about 10 >>> feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed with >>> long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to install >>> it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    Regarding your question. From a structural standpoint no.

    Drywall can work as a shear wall for earthquake reinforcement. Specific
    types of plywood are normally used in proper retrofits, but AFAIU drywall
    can work well enough depending on the requirements and the drywall specs.

    For plywood shear walls, horizontal panels are preferred, even where you can fit full, evenly spaced panels in either direction. The experimental
    evidence (the specifics of which I forget) is much weaker than the
    rationales contractors give, but the evidence still slightly favors horizontal placement. My neighbor retrofit his first floor a year after I
    did and boasted (based on his contractor's feel-good BS) that his panels
    were placed horizontal, unlike mine which were placed vertical. In our situations it almost certainly didn't matter. Rather I'm sure placement was in actuality dictated by which was easier and cheaper for the contractor.
    But *technically* I felt bound to concede his point and nod my head.

    At least as important as the drywall specs, and definitely more important than direction, would be the fastener type, spec, and placement. For plywood retrofit shearwalls, screws are considered a conspicuous sign of shoddy
    work. But I'm sure screws could still be used as long as they met the right specs; screws just aren't as fool- and defect-proof as nails. Maybe the reverse is true for drywall, with screws making it easier to achieve maximum benefit.

    +

    What is an earth quake? ;~)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to Leon on Thu Oct 7 09:49:14 2021
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:14:25 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:

    On 10/7/2021 12:57 AM, William Ahern wrote:
    John Grossbohlin <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:
    "knuttle" wrote in message news:sjkdtu$7mb$1@dont-email.me...

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about 10 >>>> feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed with
    long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to install >>>> it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    Regarding your question. From a structural standpoint no.

    Drywall can work as a shear wall for earthquake reinforcement. Specific
    types of plywood are normally used in proper retrofits, but AFAIU drywall
    can work well enough depending on the requirements and the drywall specs.

    For plywood shear walls, horizontal panels are preferred, even where you can >> fit full, evenly spaced panels in either direction. The experimental
    evidence (the specifics of which I forget) is much weaker than the
    rationales contractors give, but the evidence still slightly favors
    horizontal placement. My neighbor retrofit his first floor a year after I
    did and boasted (based on his contractor's feel-good BS) that his panels
    were placed horizontal, unlike mine which were placed vertical. In our
    situations it almost certainly didn't matter. Rather I'm sure placement was >> in actuality dictated by which was easier and cheaper for the contractor.
    But *technically* I felt bound to concede his point and nod my head.

    At least as important as the drywall specs, and definitely more important
    than direction, would be the fastener type, spec, and placement. For plywood >> retrofit shearwalls, screws are considered a conspicuous sign of shoddy
    work. But I'm sure screws could still be used as long as they met the right >> specs; screws just aren't as fool- and defect-proof as nails. Maybe the
    reverse is true for drywall, with screws making it easier to achieve maximum >> benefit.

    +

    What is an earth quake? ;~)


    2 ounces Cognac
    1 ounce absinthe
    Garnish: lemon twist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Thu Oct 7 09:36:09 2021
    On 10/7/2021 8:49 AM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:14:25 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:

    On 10/7/2021 12:57 AM, William Ahern wrote:
    John Grossbohlin <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:
    "knuttle" wrote in message news:sjkdtu$7mb$1@dont-email.me...

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about 10
    feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed with
    long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to install
    it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    Regarding your question. From a structural standpoint no.

    Drywall can work as a shear wall for earthquake reinforcement. Specific
    types of plywood are normally used in proper retrofits, but AFAIU drywall >>> can work well enough depending on the requirements and the drywall specs. >>>
    For plywood shear walls, horizontal panels are preferred, even where you can
    fit full, evenly spaced panels in either direction. The experimental
    evidence (the specifics of which I forget) is much weaker than the
    rationales contractors give, but the evidence still slightly favors
    horizontal placement. My neighbor retrofit his first floor a year after I >>> did and boasted (based on his contractor's feel-good BS) that his panels >>> were placed horizontal, unlike mine which were placed vertical. In our
    situations it almost certainly didn't matter. Rather I'm sure placement was >>> in actuality dictated by which was easier and cheaper for the contractor. >>> But *technically* I felt bound to concede his point and nod my head.

    At least as important as the drywall specs, and definitely more important >>> than direction, would be the fastener type, spec, and placement. For plywood
    retrofit shearwalls, screws are considered a conspicuous sign of shoddy
    work. But I'm sure screws could still be used as long as they met the right >>> specs; screws just aren't as fool- and defect-proof as nails. Maybe the
    reverse is true for drywall, with screws making it easier to achieve maximum
    benefit.

    +

    What is an earth quake? ;~)


    2 ounces Cognac
    1 ounce absinthe
    Garnish: lemon twist


    ohhhhh. But what about all those special fasteners. LOL

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From knuttle@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 7 12:21:47 2021
    T24gMTAvNy8yMDIxIDg6NTUgQU0sIERhdmUgaW4gU29UZXggd3JvdGU6DQo+IE9uIDEwLzYv MjAyMSAxMjozNCBQTSwgQmVlcGVyIHdyb3RlOg0KPiANCj4+PiBXaXRoIHRoYXQgc2FpZCBz aGVldCByb2NrIGNvbWVzIGluIHNldmVyYWwgbGVuZ3Rocy7CoCBNb3N0IG9mdGVuIHRoZSAN Cj4+PiBsb25nZXIgdGhhbiA4JyBsZW5ndGhzIGFyZSBwbGFjZWQgaG9yaXpvbnRhbGx5IGlm IHRoZSB3aWxsIGlzIHNob3J0ZXIgDQo+Pj4gdGhhbiB0aGUgc2hlZXQuwqAgSUlSQyBzaGVl dCByb2NrIGNvbWVzIGluIDgnLCAxMCcsIGFuZCAxMicgbGVuZ2h0cy4NCj4gDQo+ICDCoMKg wqDCoFRlYXJpbmcgb3V0IHdldCBkcnl3YWxsIGFmdGVyIFRyb3BpY2FsIFN0b3JtIEFsbGlz b24gZHJvcHBlZCB1cCB0byANCj4gMjQgaW5jaGVzIG9mIHJhaW4gW0lJUkNdIGluIDI0IGhv dXJzLCBmbG9vZGVkIGh1bmRyZWRzL3Rob3VzYW5kcyBvZiANCj4gSG91c3RvbiBhcmVhIGhv bWVzIGluIDIwMDIgd2UgcXVpY2tseSByZWFsaXplZCB0aGF0IGhvcml6b250YWxseSANCj4g aW5zdGFsbGVkIGRyeXdhbGwgbWFkZSBmb3IgYSBjb252ZW5pZW50IGhlaWdodC9icmVhayBm b3IgdGVhci1vdXQgYW5kIA0KPiByZXBsYWNlbWVudCBvZiBmdWxsIHNoZWV0cy7CoCBIaWdo ZXN0IHdhdGVybGluZSBvZiB0aGUgZml2ZSBob3VzZXMgd2UgDQo+IHJlcGFpcmVkIHdhcyAz MSBvciAzMiBpbmNoZXMuwqAgSXQgZGVmaW5pdGVseSBtb3ZlZCB0aGUgdGltZSBsaW5lIGZv ciANCj4gdGVhci1vdXQgYW5kIGRyeS1vdXQuDQo+IA0KPiBEYXZlIGluIFNvVGV4DQo+IA0K PiANClRoaXMgaXMgc29tZXRoaW5nIHdlIGRlZmluaXRlbHkgd2lsbCBub3QgaGF2ZSB0byB3 b3JyeSBhYm91dCBXZSBhcmUgDQphYm91dCA4MCcgYWJvdmUgYSBjcmVlayB0aGF0IHJ1bnMg dGhyb3VnaCBhIHN3YW1wIHRoYXQgaXMgb3ZlciBhIGhhbGYgDQptaWxlIHdpZGUuICBJdCB3 ZSBnZXQgZmxvb2RlZCwgbWFueSBwZW9wbGUgd2lsbCBiZSBsb29raW5nIGZvciB0aGUgZG92 ZS4NCg==

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to Leon on Thu Oct 7 12:36:36 2021
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 09:36:09 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:

    On 10/7/2021 8:49 AM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:14:25 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:

    On 10/7/2021 12:57 AM, William Ahern wrote:
    John Grossbohlin <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:
    "knuttle" wrote in message news:sjkdtu$7mb$1@dont-email.me...

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about 10
    feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed with
    long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to install
    it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    Regarding your question. From a structural standpoint no.

    Drywall can work as a shear wall for earthquake reinforcement. Specific >>>> types of plywood are normally used in proper retrofits, but AFAIU drywall >>>> can work well enough depending on the requirements and the drywall specs. >>>>
    For plywood shear walls, horizontal panels are preferred, even where you can
    fit full, evenly spaced panels in either direction. The experimental
    evidence (the specifics of which I forget) is much weaker than the
    rationales contractors give, but the evidence still slightly favors
    horizontal placement. My neighbor retrofit his first floor a year after I >>>> did and boasted (based on his contractor's feel-good BS) that his panels >>>> were placed horizontal, unlike mine which were placed vertical. In our >>>> situations it almost certainly didn't matter. Rather I'm sure placement was
    in actuality dictated by which was easier and cheaper for the contractor. >>>> But *technically* I felt bound to concede his point and nod my head.

    At least as important as the drywall specs, and definitely more important >>>> than direction, would be the fastener type, spec, and placement. For plywood
    retrofit shearwalls, screws are considered a conspicuous sign of shoddy >>>> work. But I'm sure screws could still be used as long as they met the right
    specs; screws just aren't as fool- and defect-proof as nails. Maybe the >>>> reverse is true for drywall, with screws making it easier to achieve maximum
    benefit.

    +

    What is an earth quake? ;~)


    2 ounces Cognac
    1 ounce absinthe
    Garnish: lemon twist


    ohhhhh. But what about all those special fasteners. LOL
    Yo mean the ones that need a mixture of vofka and orange juice to
    remove???

    You're SCREWED

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to william@25thandClement.com on Thu Oct 7 12:35:13 2021
    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 22:57:29 -0700, William Ahern
    <william@25thandClement.com> wrote:

    John Grossbohlin <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:
    "knuttle" wrote in message news:sjkdtu$7mb$1@dont-email.me...

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about 10 >>>feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed with >>>long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to install >>>it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    Regarding your question. From a structural standpoint no.

    Drywall can work as a shear wall for earthquake reinforcement. Specific
    types of plywood are normally used in proper retrofits, but AFAIU drywall
    can work well enough depending on the requirements and the drywall specs.

    For plywood shear walls, horizontal panels are preferred, even where you can >fit full, evenly spaced panels in either direction. The experimental
    evidence (the specifics of which I forget) is much weaker than the
    rationales contractors give, but the evidence still slightly favors >horizontal placement. My neighbor retrofit his first floor a year after I
    did and boasted (based on his contractor's feel-good BS) that his panels
    were placed horizontal, unlike mine which were placed vertical. In our >situations it almost certainly didn't matter. Rather I'm sure placement was >in actuality dictated by which was easier and cheaper for the contractor.
    But *technically* I felt bound to concede his point and nod my head.

    At least as important as the drywall specs, and definitely more important >than direction, would be the fastener type, spec, and placement. For plywood >retrofit shearwalls, screws are considered a conspicuous sign of shoddy
    work. But I'm sure screws could still be used as long as they met the right >specs; screws just aren't as fool- and defect-proof as nails. Maybe the >reverse is true for drywall, with screws making it easier to achieve maximum >benefit.
    I wouls NEVER nail drywall. Screws can cause pops too, but nails
    WILL pop. Guaranteed.
    ANd for plywood osing PROPER screws is better than nailing - even if
    proper hot galvanized ardox nails are used.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to knuttle on Thu Oct 7 12:16:42 2021
    On 10/7/2021 11:21 AM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/7/2021 8:55 AM, Dave in SoTex wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 12:34 PM, Beeper wrote:

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths.  Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is
    shorter than the sheet.  IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12'
    lenghts.

         Tearing out wet drywall after Tropical Storm Allison dropped up
    to 24 inches of rain [IIRC] in 24 hours, flooded hundreds/thousands of
    Houston area homes in 2002 we quickly realized that horizontally
    installed drywall made for a convenient height/break for tear-out and
    replacement of full sheets.  Highest waterline of the five houses we
    repaired was 31 or 32 inches.  It definitely moved the time line for
    tear-out and dry-out.

    Dave in SoTex


    This is something we definitely will not have to worry about We are
    about 80' above a creek that runs through a swamp that is over a half
    mile wide.  It we get flooded, many people will be looking for the dove.


    I don't know your particular situation but never say never. 4 years ago hurricane Harvey then tropical storm Harvey brought 50+ inches of rain
    in a 3 day period to the Houston metro area.

    While you may be 80' above a creek, that is no guarantee. Although I
    would feel safe.
    Our home is 65 miles from the gulf coast. Our home is approximately 98'
    above sea level. 3 times our street filled with water during the
    heaviest rains on the 3rd day. Streets were pretty much flooded all the
    way to the coast.

    The probability of flooding is all dependent on how much rain or
    draining water from other areas that you get and how fast it can drain.
    It took 2 weeks for parts of Houston to fully drain.

    Best bet is to look at water shed maps for your area.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DerbyDad03@21:1/5 to keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net on Thu Oct 7 12:00:33 2021
    On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 12:21:51 PM UTC-4, keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net wrote:
    On 10/7/2021 8:55 AM, Dave in SoTex wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 12:34 PM, Beeper wrote:

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is shorter
    than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' lenghts.

    Tearing out wet drywall after Tropical Storm Allison dropped up to
    24 inches of rain [IIRC] in 24 hours, flooded hundreds/thousands of
    Houston area homes in 2002 we quickly realized that horizontally
    installed drywall made for a convenient height/break for tear-out and replacement of full sheets. Highest waterline of the five houses we repaired was 31 or 32 inches. It definitely moved the time line for tear-out and dry-out.

    Dave in SoTex


    This is something we definitely will not have to worry about We are
    about 80' above a creek that runs through a swamp that is over a half
    mile wide. It we get flooded, many people will be looking for the dove.

    I'm in a similar situation. Roughly 80' almost straight down to the bay
    on the east and that same 80' over about a mile to the lake to the north.
    It's also down hill to the south and west.

    One year we got a letter from our mortgage holder informing us that we
    were in a FEMA flood zone and that if we didn't buy our own flood insurance, they were authorized to buy it for us.

    When I called and started using words like "biblical proportions", they did
    a little research and told me that I could ignore the letter. It turns out that someone made a minor programming error which caused the letter to be
    sent to every single one of their mortgagees.

    The part that I still wonder about is the fact that it took them 3 months
    to send a "retraction" to those of us that received the letter in error. I often
    wonder how many people believed the letter and purchased flood insurance
    during those 3 months. I would hope that the ins co's would tell people that they weren't in a FEMA flood zone and didn't sell them the unnecessary insurance.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 7 21:25:56 2021
    wrote in message news:8r6slgdmutsnb02u928281g7bk6g90r0i5@4ax.com...

    One thing to think about is the sight line. Hung horizontally, you
    may see the joint because you're looking right down it's length. Avoid
    the seam at eye level (2' panel on the bottom) or you will see it no
    matter how good the taping is.

    Putting the 2' piece at the bottom (or top for that matter) leaves you with
    the sheets joining at tapered edges... a flat joint. Prefill the joint with
    hot mud (setting joint compound) then tape and top coat with at least two coats. Done well you will not see the joints as they will appear flat. By pre-filling the gap between panels with hot mud the panels will act as one piece of drywall and you should not get a bulge or crack over time. The
    down side of putting the cut edge at the ceiling is you don't have a
    straight factory edge butted against the ceiling... In which case you might
    not get as crisp of a corner as a result. Pre-fill the irregularities with
    hot mud either way!

    If you put the 2' piece in the middle you will have one edge that is not tapered. That results in what is essentially a butt joint. A butt joint
    needs to be floated out a significant distance to hide it.... 2-2 1/2 feet
    is not uncommon for a pro and most amateurs cannot do them well.

    All that said, the OP is rocking his garage so none of this makes much difference! ;~)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to Clare Snyder on Thu Oct 7 21:36:00 2021
    "Clare Snyder" wrote in message news:34rslgl0ctvvsbuotbsbfls3ssal7kub0n@4ax.com...

    On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 21:30:41 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" ><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    "knuttle" wrote in message news:sjkdtu$7mb$1@dont-email.me...

    I plan to finish our garage as a garage/work shop. The walls are about >>>10
    feet high.

    Part of the garage is already dry walled, and the drywall is installed >>>with
    long side horizontally.

    From a handling point of view, it seems that it would be easier to >>>install
    it with the long side vertical.

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    Regarding your question. From a structural standpoint no. However, >>generally
    you have fewer linear feet to tape with horizontal hanging but not always.

    Me... I've hung and taped a fair amount of drywall. In your case I'd >>probably hang 4'x12' sheets horizontally. Start with 4' widths at the top >>and put the nominal 2' at the bottom. If you are working alone you can >>hang the upper sheets using a panel lift--they aren't just for ceilings! >>You
    can reach the horizontal joints fairly easy at those heights for taping
    and
    there is less taping to do.

    Depending on where the door(s) are located you might be able to avoid >>having
    to tape at least some butt joints.


    It''s not very common to have more than 8 or 10 feet between corners
    and windows or doors so in MOST cases there is no vertical joint in
    the "eye level" panets when mounting horizontal. If there is, a
    staggered vertical joint is not terribly visible. A full height
    vertical joint every 4 feet is a royal B---h to hide - - . Making the
    joints -if required - on the upper course cantered above doors or
    windows makes for a nice short vertical seam and the sides of the
    windows draw your eye away from the joint -= and it is unusual to
    require more than one joint in ther upper course even using the
    readily available 8 foot sheets (most walls are under 16 feet long)

    Since the OP mentioned that some of the garage walls are already rocked I'm guessing it's the outside walls that need to be rocked. That would suggest
    that at least one of the walls could be 18-24' long. That makes avoiding
    butt joints by burying them in doorways a bit more iffy... Been there. ;~)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to Leon on Thu Oct 7 22:02:39 2021
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:16:42 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:

    On 10/7/2021 11:21 AM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/7/2021 8:55 AM, Dave in SoTex wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 12:34 PM, Beeper wrote:

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is
    shorter than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12'
    lenghts.

    Tearing out wet drywall after Tropical Storm Allison dropped up
    to 24 inches of rain [IIRC] in 24 hours, flooded hundreds/thousands of
    Houston area homes in 2002 we quickly realized that horizontally
    installed drywall made for a convenient height/break for tear-out and
    replacement of full sheets. Highest waterline of the five houses we
    repaired was 31 or 32 inches. It definitely moved the time line for
    tear-out and dry-out.

    Dave in SoTex


    This is something we definitely will not have to worry about We are
    about 80' above a creek that runs through a swamp that is over a half
    mile wide. It we get flooded, many people will be looking for the dove.


    I don't know your particular situation but never say never. 4 years ago >hurricane Harvey then tropical storm Harvey brought 50+ inches of rain
    in a 3 day period to the Houston metro area.

    While you may be 80' above a creek, that is no guarantee. Although I
    would feel safe.
    Our home is 65 miles from the gulf coast. Our home is approximately 98' >above sea level. 3 times our street filled with water during the
    heaviest rains on the 3rd day. Streets were pretty much flooded all the
    way to the coast.

    But that's not 65 miles tilted strait toward the coast. There are
    local minimums that will fill with water that has nowhere to go. Hell,
    I live 950' above sea level but I don't expect it to drain very fast
    (maybe 2-10 years ;-).

    The probability of flooding is all dependent on how much rain or
    draining water from other areas that you get and how fast it can drain.
    It took 2 weeks for parts of Houston to fully drain.

    And the terrain. 80' on a bluff over a river would be relatively
    safe. A mile behind that, perhaps not so much.

    Best bet is to look at water shed maps for your area.

    Do they have your hurricane marked?



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Thu Oct 7 22:09:16 2021
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:25:56 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:8r6slgdmutsnb02u928281g7bk6g90r0i5@4ax.com...

    One thing to think about is the sight line. Hung horizontally, you
    may see the joint because you're looking right down it's length. Avoid
    the seam at eye level (2' panel on the bottom) or you will see it no
    matter how good the taping is.

    Putting the 2' piece at the bottom (or top for that matter) leaves you with >the sheets joining at tapered edges... a flat joint. Prefill the joint with >hot mud (setting joint compound) then tape and top coat with at least two >coats. Done well you will not see the joints as they will appear flat. By >pre-filling the gap between panels with hot mud the panels will act as one >piece of drywall and you should not get a bulge or crack over time. The
    down side of putting the cut edge at the ceiling is you don't have a
    straight factory edge butted against the ceiling... In which case you might >not get as crisp of a corner as a result. Pre-fill the irregularities with >hot mud either way!

    Even if done right, you will see the seam if you can look straight
    down a long wall. Over time, it will only get worse.

    If you put the 2' piece in the middle you will have one edge that is not >tapered. That results in what is essentially a butt joint. A butt joint
    needs to be floated out a significant distance to hide it.... 2-2 1/2 feet
    is not uncommon for a pro and most amateurs cannot do them well.

    All that said, the OP is rocking his garage so none of this makes much >difference! ;~)

    I managed to screw up the ceiling in my first house's garage. Well, I
    screwed it up but it was really screwed up too. ;-)

    That was my excuse, "it's only a garage".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 8 00:51:23 2021
    wrote in message news:0r9vlg92o466tj5ikg875c620khgjoe64l@4ax.com...

    Even if done right, you will see the seam if you can look straight
    down a long wall. Over time, it will only get worse.

    In my experience, with wood framing the waviness of the wall will likely be more noticeable than a well hung and taped flat joint...

    In new construction that is very common as the framing dries, twists,
    shrinks, bows, settles, etc., over time and it is telegraphed through the drywall.

    Careful renovations are another story. This as the framing has generally normalized and you can make the walls flat and they will stay that way. I've used a scrub plane to remove the high spots and used shims to fill in the
    low spots in the field of the walls. In some cases I also used hot mud to flatten the framing out. The goal is to create the illusion of flatness in
    both the rocking and mudding...

    After the rock was hung I've also did some "mud framing" on the surface of
    the drywall near the bottom. That was done so that the baseboards would be straight. Almost nothing looks worse to me in finish carpentry than
    baseboards with gaps between them and the wall... or wide globs of chalking.

    I've also flattened the ceilings with shimmed furring strips...

    Straight framing combined with well hung drywall, prefilling, and carefully taped joints can look just fine for decades... in a garage it will look
    perfect until the day the garage is cleared out to move!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to tcr...@yahoo.com on Thu Oct 7 21:45:09 2021
    On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:56:44 AM UTC-5, tcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 11:04:33 AM UTC-4, keith_...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the
    top of the firs row and pushed into place.
    1. Drywall the ceiling.
    2. The first sheet for the wall should be placed up tight to the ceiling. This makes a tight joint with a tapered edge for taping and helps support the ceiling sheet.
    3. The next sheet goes under the first. For an 8' wall that's it. The inch or so at the bottom will be covered by trim. For a 10' wall you'll have to decide if you want a 2' "patch" in the middle or at the bottom. Middle is easier to work on to feather
    out, bottom may be less noticeable. In a workshop it probably doesn't matter.


    I cannot understand why so many people are talking about using 2 foot sections on this wall and whether to put it at the top or bottom. I think there are a lot of people who are very unfamiliar with drywall.

    Drywall sheets come in thicknesses of 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", and 5/8".
    Drywall sheets come in lengths of 8', 9', 10', 12', 14', and I think you can even get 16' lengths too. Might have to go to a drywall supplier for these.
    Drywall sheets come in widths of 4', 4.5', and 5'.

    Check the drywall section at Menards, Home Depot, Lowes online and you will find almost all of the sizes I mentioned above. You don't even have to go to a specialized drywall supplier. With all the sizes I listed above, all rooms from 8 to 10 feet high
    can be drywalled with two sheets stacked horizontal. And with sheets of 14' or I think 16', almost all walls can be covered with one long sheet from corner to corner. Or to make it easy to carry by one or two guys, use two 8' lengths with a seam in
    the middle. House construction companies and their supporting drywall makers are all about fast, cheap, easy. They have figured out long ago to build rooms in heights and lengths to standard sizes and to make drywall sheets the correct sizes to cover
    those walls quick and easy. Minimizing labor hours and cost to hang drywall.










    Horizontal or vertical is up to you. It may make a difference on how many joints you have to deal with especially (untapered) butt joints. In home construction, many rooms can be finished with 10 or 12 foot sheets covering a full wall and eliminating
    the butt joints.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 8 01:44:05 2021
    "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" wrote in message news:b856d944-97da-421d-8517-7b2ae5790028n@googlegroups.com...

    I cannot understand why so many people are talking about using 2 foot >sections on this wall and whether to put it at the top or bottom. I >think >there are a lot of people who are very unfamiliar with drywall.

    Drywall sheets come in thicknesses of 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", and 5/8".
    Drywall sheets come in lengths of 8', 9', 10', 12', 14', and I think you
    can even get 16' lengths too. Might have to go to a drywall supplier >for >these.
    Drywall sheets come in widths of 4', 4.5', and 5'.

    Check the drywall section at Menards, Home Depot, Lowes online and you will >find almost all of the sizes I mentioned above. You don't >even have to go >to a specialized drywall supplier. With all the sizes I listed above, all >rooms from 8 to 10 feet high can be drywalled with >two sheets stacked >horizontal. And with sheets of 14' or I think 16', almost all walls can be >covered with one long sheet from corner to >corner. Or to make it easy to >carry by one or two guys, use two 8' lengths with a seam in the middle. >House construction companies and >their supporting drywall makers are all >about fast, cheap, easy. They have figured out long ago to build rooms in >heights and lengths to >standard sizes and to make drywall sheets the
    correct sizes to cover those walls quick and easy. Minimizing labor hours >and cost to hang >drywall.

    What is available definitely depends on your local market. The local independents have a limited selection as do the local home depot and lowes. None stock 1/4" but some stores 20 miles away do. The only sizes they have
    in 1/2" are 4x8, 4x10 and 4x12. Other thicknesses, green board, and glass
    mat are only available in 4x8. The independents can order you about
    anything in full units with enough lead time. If you don't want a full unit there is a significant premium and you may wait a significant period of time
    to get it... if they can even get it. As such, back to the garage situation--4x12s along with tape and mud is the reasonable option based on
    my local market.

    Years ago when there were housing developments being built around here there were more options... like 14' and 4.5' (I don't recall there being 5' but
    then I wasn't looking for it). That was 30-50 years ago when there was a
    major corporation in town that employed as many as 7,500 people. Now... it's
    a different supply and demand situation and we use what we can get easily
    and cheaply. The nearest specialty drywall supplier is about 55 miles north. Others are 90+ miles south. I'm certainly not going to travel 100-200 miles round trip to pick up a 6-12 sheets of 5' rock for a garage, nor would I
    want to pay for shipping it!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DerbyDad03@21:1/5 to russellseaton1@yahoo.com on Fri Oct 8 06:20:07 2021
    On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 12:45:12 AM UTC-4, russellseaton1@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:56:44 AM UTC-5, tcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 11:04:33 AM UTC-4, keith_...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. With the long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.
    1. Drywall the ceiling.
    2. The first sheet for the wall should be placed up tight to the ceiling. This makes a tight joint with a tapered edge for taping and helps support the ceiling sheet.
    3. The next sheet goes under the first. For an 8' wall that's it. The inch or so at the bottom will be covered by trim. For a 10' wall you'll have to decide if you want a 2' "patch" in the middle or at the bottom. Middle is easier to work on to
    feather out, bottom may be less noticeable. In a workshop it probably doesn't matter.

    I cannot understand why so many people are talking about using 2 foot sections on this wall and whether to put it at the top or bottom. I think there are a lot of people who are very unfamiliar with drywall.

    Drywall sheets come in thicknesses of 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", and 5/8".
    Drywall sheets come in lengths of 8', 9', 10', 12', 14', and I think you can even get 16' lengths too. Might have to go to a drywall supplier for these.
    Drywall sheets come in widths of 4', 4.5', and 5'.

    Check the drywall section at Menards, Home Depot, Lowes online and you will find almost all of the sizes I mentioned above.

    I just checked the drywall section on the Home Depot, Lowes & Menards websites. I scrolled
    around and also tried their size filters.

    Home Depot: The only width they list is 4'.
    Lowe's: They list 4' and 4.5'. All three 4.5' products are Unavailable for on-line purchase or in-store pickup.
    Menards: They list 4' and 4.5'. The 4.5' appears to be available in 12' lengths only.

    Maybe my search skills are fading. Do you have any links for the other sizes that these stores carry?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Fri Oct 8 12:45:10 2021
    On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 00:51:23 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:0r9vlg92o466tj5ikg875c620khgjoe64l@4ax.com...

    Even if done right, you will see the seam if you can look straight
    down a long wall. Over time, it will only get worse.

    In my experience, with wood framing the waviness of the wall will likely be >more noticeable than a well hung and taped flat joint...

    In new construction that is very common as the framing dries, twists, >shrinks, bows, settles, etc., over time and it is telegraphed through the >drywall.

    Careful renovations are another story. This as the framing has generally >normalized and you can make the walls flat and they will stay that way. I've >used a scrub plane to remove the high spots and used shims to fill in the
    low spots in the field of the walls. In some cases I also used hot mud to >flatten the framing out. The goal is to create the illusion of flatness in >both the rocking and mudding...

    After the rock was hung I've also did some "mud framing" on the surface of >the drywall near the bottom. That was done so that the baseboards would be >straight. Almost nothing looks worse to me in finish carpentry than >baseboards with gaps between them and the wall... or wide globs of chalking.

    I've also flattened the ceilings with shimmed furring strips...

    I've done that with floors and have thought about it for walls but
    thought I was being anal. I'm using MDF in one place behind my lathe
    and a few other tools. I figured it would hold up better and be
    easier to clean. Anyway, the first sheet I hung has a huge, ugly,
    wave in it. The stud is out at least a half-inch, maybe 3/4. I
    considered shimming out the stud(s) but I'd have to do the same on the
    other side. Perhaps it would be easier just to replace it (2x6 - all
    walls in the house are supporting), though others are out, too, but by
    smaller amounts.

    Straight framing combined with well hung drywall, prefilling, and carefully >taped joints can look just fine for decades... in a garage it will look >perfect until the day the garage is cleared out to move!

    Perfection is seldom seen. I guess, never, in my case.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to ritzannaseaton@gmail.com on Fri Oct 8 12:48:37 2021
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:45:09 -0700 (PDT), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:56:44 AM UTC-5, tcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 11:04:33 AM UTC-4, keith_...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long
    side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. With the
    long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the
    top of the firs row and pushed into place.
    1. Drywall the ceiling.
    2. The first sheet for the wall should be placed up tight to the ceiling. This makes a tight joint with a tapered edge for taping and helps support the ceiling sheet.
    3. The next sheet goes under the first. For an 8' wall that's it. The inch or so at the bottom will be covered by trim. For a 10' wall you'll have to decide if you want a 2' "patch" in the middle or at the bottom. Middle is easier to work on to
    feather out, bottom may be less noticeable. In a workshop it probably doesn't matter.


    I cannot understand why so many people are talking about using 2 foot sections on this wall and whether to put it at the top or bottom. I think there are a lot of people who are very unfamiliar with drywall.

    Drywall sheets come in thicknesses of 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", and 5/8".
    Drywall sheets come in lengths of 8', 9', 10', 12', 14', and I think you can even get 16' lengths too. Might have to go to a drywall supplier for these.
    Drywall sheets come in widths of 4', 4.5', and 5'.

    "Available", yes, but I've only *seen* 4' wide sheetrock. I can't
    handle more than a 4x8 sheet by myself. So, 4x8 it is.

    Check the drywall section at Menards, Home Depot, Lowes online and you will find almost all of the sizes I mentioned above. You don't even have to go to a specialized drywall supplier. With all the sizes I listed above, all rooms from 8 to 10 feet
    high can be drywalled with two sheets stacked horizontal. And with sheets of 14' or I think 16', almost all walls can be covered with one long sheet from corner to corner. Or to make it easy to carry by one or two guys, use two 8' lengths with a seam
    in the middle. House construction companies and their supporting drywall makers are all about fast, cheap, easy. They have figured out long ago to build rooms in heights and lengths to standard sizes and to make drywall sheets the correct sizes to
    cover those walls quick and easy. Minimizing labor hours and cost to hang drywall.

    Not here! Lengths, yes. Widths? You can have any width you want as
    long as you want 48".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to ritzannaseaton@gmail.com on Fri Oct 8 12:53:02 2021
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:45:09 -0700 (PDT), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:56:44 AM UTC-5, tcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 11:04:33 AM UTC-4, keith_...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long
    side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. With the
    long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the
    top of the firs row and pushed into place.
    1. Drywall the ceiling.
    2. The first sheet for the wall should be placed up tight to the ceiling. This makes a tight joint with a tapered edge for taping and helps support the ceiling sheet.
    3. The next sheet goes under the first. For an 8' wall that's it. The inch or so at the bottom will be covered by trim. For a 10' wall you'll have to decide if you want a 2' "patch" in the middle or at the bottom. Middle is easier to work on to
    feather out, bottom may be less noticeable. In a workshop it probably doesn't matter.


    I cannot understand why so many people are talking about using 2 foot sections on this wall and whether to put it at the top or bottom. I think there are a lot of people who are very unfamiliar with drywall.

    Drywall sheets come in thicknesses of 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", and 5/8".
    Drywall sheets come in lengths of 8', 9', 10', 12', 14', and I think you can even get 16' lengths too. Might have to go to a drywall supplier for these.
    Drywall sheets come in widths of 4', 4.5', and 5'.

    Check the drywall section at Menards, Home Depot, Lowes online and you will find almost all of the sizes I mentioned above. You don't even have to go to a specialized drywall supplier. With all the sizes I listed above, all rooms from 8 to 10 feet
    high can be drywalled with two sheets stacked horizontal. And with sheets of 14' or I think 16', almost all walls can be covered with one long sheet from corner to corner. Or to make it easy to carry by one or two guys, use two 8' lengths with a seam
    in the middle. House construction companies and their supporting drywall makers are all about fast, cheap, easy. They have figured out long ago to build rooms in heights and lengths to standard sizes and to make drywall sheets the correct sizes to
    cover those walls quick and easy. Minimizing labor hours and cost to hang drywall.

    Oh, there is a sheetrock distributor about 1-1/2 miles from me. They
    bring it in on railroad cars and ship it out on flat bed trucks. I
    doubt they'd want to see my pickup around looking for three sheets of
    4 1/2' sheetrock, not that it would fit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Fri Oct 8 12:12:08 2021
    On 10/8/2021 11:45 AM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 00:51:23 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:0r9vlg92o466tj5ikg875c620khgjoe64l@4ax.com...

    Even if done right, you will see the seam if you can look straight
    down a long wall. Over time, it will only get worse.

    In my experience, with wood framing the waviness of the wall will likely be >> more noticeable than a well hung and taped flat joint...

    In new construction that is very common as the framing dries, twists,
    shrinks, bows, settles, etc., over time and it is telegraphed through the
    drywall.

    Careful renovations are another story. This as the framing has generally
    normalized and you can make the walls flat and they will stay that way. I've >> used a scrub plane to remove the high spots and used shims to fill in the
    low spots in the field of the walls. In some cases I also used hot mud to
    flatten the framing out. The goal is to create the illusion of flatness in >> both the rocking and mudding...

    After the rock was hung I've also did some "mud framing" on the surface of >> the drywall near the bottom. That was done so that the baseboards would be >> straight. Almost nothing looks worse to me in finish carpentry than
    baseboards with gaps between them and the wall... or wide globs of chalking. >>
    I've also flattened the ceilings with shimmed furring strips...

    I've done that with floors and have thought about it for walls but
    thought I was being anal.

    Anal or not, that used to be a common step, called pickup framing,
    between the framing going up and the dry wall going up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Fri Oct 8 12:13:46 2021
    On 10/7/2021 9:02 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    Snip



    Best bet is to look at water shed maps for your area.

    Do they have your hurricane marked?



    What? Marked?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 8 12:16:52 2021
    On 10/7/2021 2:00 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
    On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 12:21:51 PM UTC-4, keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net wrote:
    On 10/7/2021 8:55 AM, Dave in SoTex wrote:
    On 10/6/2021 12:34 PM, Beeper wrote:

    With that said sheet rock comes in several lengths. Most often the
    longer than 8' lengths are placed horizontally if the will is shorter >>>>> than the sheet. IIRC sheet rock comes in 8', 10', and 12' lenghts.

    Tearing out wet drywall after Tropical Storm Allison dropped up to
    24 inches of rain [IIRC] in 24 hours, flooded hundreds/thousands of
    Houston area homes in 2002 we quickly realized that horizontally
    installed drywall made for a convenient height/break for tear-out and
    replacement of full sheets. Highest waterline of the five houses we
    repaired was 31 or 32 inches. It definitely moved the time line for
    tear-out and dry-out.

    Dave in SoTex


    This is something we definitely will not have to worry about We are
    about 80' above a creek that runs through a swamp that is over a half
    mile wide. It we get flooded, many people will be looking for the dove.

    I'm in a similar situation. Roughly 80' almost straight down to the bay
    on the east and that same 80' over about a mile to the lake to the north. It's also down hill to the south and west.

    One year we got a letter from our mortgage holder informing us that we
    were in a FEMA flood zone and that if we didn't buy our own flood insurance, they were authorized to buy it for us.

    When I called and started using words like "biblical proportions", they did
    a little research and told me that I could ignore the letter. It turns out that
    someone made a minor programming error which caused the letter to be
    sent to every single one of their mortgagees.

    The part that I still wonder about is the fact that it took them 3 months
    to send a "retraction" to those of us that received the letter in error. I often
    wonder how many people believed the letter and purchased flood insurance during those 3 months. I would hope that the ins co's would tell people that they weren't in a FEMA flood zone and didn't sell them the unnecessary insurance.



    I had an issue with my flood insurance going from $280 per year to $3500
    per year. That was after the big flood fiasco caused by Katrina in NO.
    We had not connection.

    Anyway satellite elevation maps showed that our home was in a more prone
    to flood location.

    Soo I had an elevation survey performed and suddenly my insurance was
    lowered.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to Leon on Fri Oct 8 23:19:07 2021
    On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:13:46 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:

    On 10/7/2021 9:02 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    Snip



    Best bet is to look at water shed maps for your area.

    Do they have your hurricane marked?



    What? Marked?

    Water shed areas are marked, sure, but that doesn't help much when
    there's 2'-3' of rain and 100MPH winds.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to ritzannaseaton@gmail.com on Sat Oct 9 00:49:17 2021
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:45:09 -0700 (PDT), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:56:44 AM UTC-5, tcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 11:04:33 AM UTC-4, keith_...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long
    side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. With the
    long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the
    top of the firs row and pushed into place.
    1. Drywall the ceiling.
    2. The first sheet for the wall should be placed up tight to the ceiling. This makes a tight joint with a tapered edge for taping and helps support the ceiling sheet.
    3. The next sheet goes under the first. For an 8' wall that's it. The inch or so at the bottom will be covered by trim. For a 10' wall you'll have to decide if you want a 2' "patch" in the middle or at the bottom. Middle is easier to work on to
    feather out, bottom may be less noticeable. In a workshop it probably doesn't matter.


    I cannot understand why so many people are talking about using 2 foot sections on this wall and whether to put it at the top or bottom. I think there are a lot of people who are very unfamiliar with drywall.

    Drywall sheets come in thicknesses of 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", and 5/8".
    Drywall sheets come in lengths of 8', 9', 10', 12', 14', and I think you can even get 16' lengths too. Might have to go to a drywall supplier for these.
    Drywall sheets come in widths of 4', 4.5', and 5'.

    Check the drywall section at Menards, Home Depot, Lowes online and you will find almost all of the sizes I mentioned above. You don't even have to go to a specialized drywall supplier. With all the sizes I listed above, all rooms from 8 to 10 feet
    high can be drywalled with two sheets stacked horizontal. And with sheets of 14' or I think 16', almost all walls can be covered with one long sheet from corner to corner. Or to make it easy to carry by one or two guys, use two 8' lengths with a seam
    in the middle. House construction companies and their supporting drywall makers are all about fast, cheap, easy. They have figured out long ago to build rooms in heights and lengths to standard sizes and to make drywall sheets the correct sizes to
    cover those walls quick and easy. Minimizing labor hours and cost to hang drywall.










    Horizontal or vertical is up to you. It may make a difference on how many joints you have to deal with especially (untapered) butt joints. In home construction, many rooms can be finished with 10 or 12 foot sheets covering a full wall and eliminating
    the butt joints.
    Getting less than full flats of anything but 4X8 around here
    virtually impossible - and full flats are special order. A few "trade
    only" yards MAY have the special sizes in stock - if you are lucky.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 8 23:37:01 2021
    On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 8:20:10 AM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
    On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 12:45:12 AM UTC-4, russell...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:56:44 AM UTC-5, tcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 11:04:33 AM UTC-4, keith_...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

    Does it make a difference horizontal or vertical?

    It seems it would be easier lifting the panels into place with the long
    side vertical, as they could be set and pushed up to the wall. With the
    long side horizontal the 2nd row piece would have to be lifted to the top of the firs row and pushed into place.
    1. Drywall the ceiling.
    2. The first sheet for the wall should be placed up tight to the ceiling. This makes a tight joint with a tapered edge for taping and helps support the ceiling sheet.
    3. The next sheet goes under the first. For an 8' wall that's it. The inch or so at the bottom will be covered by trim. For a 10' wall you'll have to decide if you want a 2' "patch" in the middle or at the bottom. Middle is easier to work on to
    feather out, bottom may be less noticeable. In a workshop it probably doesn't matter.

    I cannot understand why so many people are talking about using 2 foot sections on this wall and whether to put it at the top or bottom. I think there are a lot of people who are very unfamiliar with drywall.

    Drywall sheets come in thicknesses of 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", and 5/8".
    Drywall sheets come in lengths of 8', 9', 10', 12', 14', and I think you can even get 16' lengths too. Might have to go to a drywall supplier for these.
    Drywall sheets come in widths of 4', 4.5', and 5'.

    Check the drywall section at Menards, Home Depot, Lowes online and you will find almost all of the sizes I mentioned above.
    I just checked the drywall section on the Home Depot, Lowes & Menards websites. I scrolled
    around and also tried their size filters.

    Home Depot: The only width they list is 4'.
    Lowe's: They list 4' and 4.5'. All three 4.5' products are Unavailable for on-line purchase or in-store pickup.
    Menards: They list 4' and 4.5'. The 4.5' appears to be available in 12' lengths only.

    Maybe my search skills are fading. Do you have any links for the other sizes that these stores carry?

    I'll have to admit to making a mistake. There is apparently no 5 foot wide drywall. Just 4 and 4.5 foot wide sheets. Lengths of 8 to 16 feet. 1/4, 3/8, 1/2, 5/8 thicknesses. I was sure I had seen 5 foot wide drywall somewhere. But maybe not. I
    live in a metro of about 400,000. We have the three big homeowner stores. Plus lots of drywall supply places too. Lot of house building here. I'm sure you could find one of the drywall supply places to sell you sheets even if you are not a commercial
    business customer. You don't have to go to HomeDepot, Lowes, Menards.

    Apparently on this 10 foot tall wall he will have to put in a narrow filler strip at the bottom.

    https://www.fbmsales.com/products/drywall/
    Standard or Regular Drywall
    Standard drywall is the most commonly used material and is characterized by a white surface on both sides. It is typically available in thicknesses ranging from 1/4“to 5/8” with 1/2” most often used for residential applications and 5/8” for
    commercial projects. The lengths vary from 8’ to 16’ and widths of 48” to 54”.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Puckdropper@21:1/5 to knuttle on Sat Oct 9 08:57:30 2021
    knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
    news:sjn6qs$q40$1@dont-email.me:

    This is something we definitely will not have to worry about We are
    about 80' above a creek that runs through a swamp that is over a half
    mile wide. It we get flooded, many people will be looking for the dove

    I felt the same way about our house. It was on top of a small hill above a large plane that fed down to a 30-40' drop off. By the time our house was affected by rising flood waters, someone would have built an Ark! (The
    houses down below would have been completely under water.)

    We did have some minor flooding once, though. A storm system dropped like
    6" of rain and overwhelmed the soil so water couldn't drain away so
    it came in. Two 20 inch box fans and a dehumidifier fixed things right up.

    Puckdropper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 9 12:26:24 2021
    On Sat, 09 Oct 2021 08:57:30 GMT, Puckdropper <puckdropper@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote in >news:sjn6qs$q40$1@dont-email.me:

    This is something we definitely will not have to worry about We are
    about 80' above a creek that runs through a swamp that is over a half
    mile wide. It we get flooded, many people will be looking for the dove

    I felt the same way about our house. It was on top of a small hill above a >large plane that fed down to a 30-40' drop off. By the time our house was >affected by rising flood waters, someone would have built an Ark! (The >houses down below would have been completely under water.)

    We did have some minor flooding once, though. A storm system dropped like
    6" of rain and overwhelmed the soil so water couldn't drain away so
    it came in. Two 20 inch box fans and a dehumidifier fixed things right up.

    When you say "came in" are you talking about a basement or first
    floor?

    Builders now do a piss poor job of foundation drainage. I shouldn't
    say "now". They weren't doing a great job 60 years ago. My parents'
    house did have a sump and pump to deal with foundation drains but the
    pump just dumped the water outside on the lawn, where it found its way
    back to the foundation drains. At times the pump would run
    continuously. The basement in our current house is walk-out so only
    buried half way. Drainage isn't a problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to Puckdropper on Sat Oct 9 13:16:22 2021
    On 10/9/2021 3:57 AM, Puckdropper wrote:
    knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:sjn6qs$q40$1@dont-email.me:

    This is something we definitely will not have to worry about We are
    about 80' above a creek that runs through a swamp that is over a half
    mile wide. It we get flooded, many people will be looking for the dove

    I felt the same way about our house. It was on top of a small hill above a large plane that fed down to a 30-40' drop off. By the time our house was affected by rising flood waters, someone would have built an Ark! (The houses down below would have been completely under water.)

    But the concern is YOUR house, not the neighbors.




    We did have some minor flooding once, though. A storm system dropped like
    6" of rain and overwhelmed the soil so water couldn't drain away so
    it came in. Two 20 inch box fans and a dehumidifier fixed things right up.

    Puckdropper


    There you go! High elevations are not a guarantee.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to Leon on Sun Oct 10 21:32:50 2021
    "Leon" wrote in message
    news:_4udnXq2Y-515v38nZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com...

    On 10/8/2021 11:45 AM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 00:51:23 -0400, "John Grossbohlin"
    <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:>

    Careful renovations are another story. This as the framing has generally >>> normalized and you can make the walls flat and they will stay that way.
    I've
    used a scrub plane to remove the high spots and used shims to fill in
    the
    low spots in the field of the walls. In some cases I also used hot mud
    to
    flatten the framing out. The goal is to create the illusion of flatness
    in
    both the rocking and mudding...

    After the rock was hung I've also did some "mud framing" on the surface
    of
    the drywall near the bottom. That was done so that the baseboards would
    be
    straight. Almost nothing looks worse to me in finish carpentry than
    baseboards with gaps between them and the wall... or wide globs of
    chalking.

    I've also flattened the ceilings with shimmed furring strips...

    I've done that with floors and have thought about it for walls but
    thought I was being anal.

    Anal or not, that used to be a common step, called pickup framing, between >the framing going up and the dry wall going up.

    I attribute my actions to being a fine woodworker doing carpentry. ;~)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 11 22:34:35 2021
    wrote in message news:0r9vlg92o466tj5ikg875c620khgjoe64l@4ax.com...

    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:25:56 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" ><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Putting the 2' piece at the bottom (or top for that matter) leaves you
    with
    the sheets joining at tapered edges... a flat joint. Prefill the joint
    with
    hot mud (setting joint compound) then tape and top coat with at least two >>coats. Done well you will not see the joints as they will appear flat. By >>pre-filling the gap between panels with hot mud the panels will act as one >>piece of drywall and you should not get a bulge or crack over time. The >>down side of putting the cut edge at the ceiling is you don't have a >>straight factory edge butted against the ceiling... In which case you
    might
    not get as crisp of a corner as a result. Pre-fill the irregularities
    with
    hot mud either way!

    Even if done right, you will see the seam if you can look straight
    down a long wall. Over time, it will only get worse.

    Just came across this video related to prefilling joints.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDgtX38KVM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Puckdropper@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Tue Oct 12 08:17:05 2021
    krw@notreal.com wrote in
    news:s6g3mgl87rbec7p9s17ip4hfjo1sd222ab@4ax.com:


    When you say "came in" are you talking about a basement or first
    floor?

    Builders now do a piss poor job of foundation drainage. I shouldn't
    say "now". They weren't doing a great job 60 years ago. My parents'
    house did have a sump and pump to deal with foundation drains but the
    pump just dumped the water outside on the lawn, where it found its way
    back to the foundation drains. At times the pump would run
    continuously. The basement in our current house is walk-out so only
    buried half way. Drainage isn't a problem.


    Basement.

    Any time you rely on a sump pump, you've got a problem. I just wish more people would take the time to water proof the basements properly when building--when it's easy to get at. The new side of the house has
    plastic "pebble" board (I don't remember the name), a passive foundation
    drain that drains away from the house, and I'm not sure if the cinder
    block has a waterproof coating, but that side never gets water in it. It
    sure didn't add a whole lot to the cost of the build.

    Puckdropper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Tue Oct 12 20:51:32 2021
    On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:34:35 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:0r9vlg92o466tj5ikg875c620khgjoe64l@4ax.com...

    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:25:56 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Putting the 2' piece at the bottom (or top for that matter) leaves you >>>with
    the sheets joining at tapered edges... a flat joint. Prefill the joint >>>with
    hot mud (setting joint compound) then tape and top coat with at least two >>>coats. Done well you will not see the joints as they will appear flat. By >>>pre-filling the gap between panels with hot mud the panels will act as one >>>piece of drywall and you should not get a bulge or crack over time. The >>>down side of putting the cut edge at the ceiling is you don't have a >>>straight factory edge butted against the ceiling... In which case you >>>might
    not get as crisp of a corner as a result. Pre-fill the irregularities >>>with
    hot mud either way!

    Even if done right, you will see the seam if you can look straight
    down a long wall. Over time, it will only get worse.

    Just came across this video related to prefilling joints.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDgtX38KVM

    Makes sense but does "pre-filling" mean that you go around and put mud
    in all of the joints, then go back and tape or does it mean that you
    load the joint with mud then tape over it immediately?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 12 20:57:55 2021
    On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:17:05 GMT, Puckdropper <puckdropper@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    krw@notreal.com wrote in
    news:s6g3mgl87rbec7p9s17ip4hfjo1sd222ab@4ax.com:


    When you say "came in" are you talking about a basement or first
    floor?

    Builders now do a piss poor job of foundation drainage. I shouldn't
    say "now". They weren't doing a great job 60 years ago. My parents'
    house did have a sump and pump to deal with foundation drains but the
    pump just dumped the water outside on the lawn, where it found its way
    back to the foundation drains. At times the pump would run
    continuously. The basement in our current house is walk-out so only
    buried half way. Drainage isn't a problem.


    Basement.

    That's what I thought. This isn't a "flood" problem, rather a ground
    water problem. This can happen anywhere except on top of a mountain
    of gravel perhaps. OTOH, insurance companies won't care. Rising
    water is rising water.

    Any time you rely on a sump pump, you've got a problem. I just wish more >people would take the time to water proof the basements properly when >building--when it's easy to get at. The new side of the house has
    plastic "pebble" board (I don't remember the name), a passive foundation >drain that drains away from the house, and I'm not sure if the cinder
    block has a waterproof coating, but that side never gets water in it. It >sure didn't add a whole lot to the cost of the build.

    The house can turn into a boat, which isn't good either. Sump pumps
    are bad but sometimes there isn't a better choice. Battery backup is
    kinda important. Power outages and rising water tend to come at the
    same time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Markem618@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Tue Oct 12 21:20:28 2021
    On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:51:32 -0400, krw@notreal.com wrote:

    On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:34:35 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" ><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:0r9vlg92o466tj5ikg875c620khgjoe64l@4ax.com...

    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:25:56 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >>><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Putting the 2' piece at the bottom (or top for that matter) leaves you >>>>with
    the sheets joining at tapered edges... a flat joint. Prefill the joint >>>>with
    hot mud (setting joint compound) then tape and top coat with at least two >>>>coats. Done well you will not see the joints as they will appear flat. By >>>>pre-filling the gap between panels with hot mud the panels will act as one >>>>piece of drywall and you should not get a bulge or crack over time. The >>>>down side of putting the cut edge at the ceiling is you don't have a >>>>straight factory edge butted against the ceiling... In which case you >>>>might
    not get as crisp of a corner as a result. Pre-fill the irregularities >>>>with
    hot mud either way!

    Even if done right, you will see the seam if you can look straight
    down a long wall. Over time, it will only get worse.

    Just came across this video related to prefilling joints.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDgtX38KVM

    Makes sense but does "pre-filling" mean that you go around and put mud
    in all of the joints, then go back and tape or does it mean that you
    load the joint with mud then tape over it immediately?

    The pros who redid the sunroom, with the framing being a bit wonky
    taped after filling sanding a first coat but starting with a flat
    surface made for a great job.

    YMMV as may your walls.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DerbyDad03@21:1/5 to k...@notreal.com on Wed Oct 13 10:05:13 2021
    On Wednesday, October 13, 2021 at 12:40:08 PM UTC-4, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:20:28 -0500, Markem618 <mark...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:51:32 -0400, k...@notreal.com wrote:

    On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:34:35 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >><nospam....@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:0r9vlg92o466tj5ik...@4ax.com...

    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:25:56 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >>>><nospam....@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Putting the 2' piece at the bottom (or top for that matter) leaves you >>>>>with
    the sheets joining at tapered edges... a flat joint. Prefill the joint >>>>>with
    hot mud (setting joint compound) then tape and top coat with at least two
    coats. Done well you will not see the joints as they will appear flat. By
    pre-filling the gap between panels with hot mud the panels will act as one
    piece of drywall and you should not get a bulge or crack over time. The >>>>>down side of putting the cut edge at the ceiling is you don't have a >>>>>straight factory edge butted against the ceiling... In which case you >>>>>might
    not get as crisp of a corner as a result. Pre-fill the irregularities >>>>>with
    hot mud either way!

    Even if done right, you will see the seam if you can look straight >>>>down a long wall. Over time, it will only get worse.

    Just came across this video related to prefilling joints.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDgtX38KVM

    Makes sense but does "pre-filling" mean that you go around and put mud
    in all of the joints, then go back and tape or does it mean that you
    load the joint with mud then tape over it immediately?

    The pros who redid the sunroom, with the framing being a bit wonky
    taped after filling sanding a first coat but starting with a flat
    surface made for a great job.
    Odd. I thought the tapered edge was to hide the tape and first layer.
    It sounds like it didn't matter if it was a tapered or butt joint,
    they all got treated as butt joints.

    Years ago I hired a guy to mud & tape a basement bathroom for me. Way
    too many corners, inside and out. Small, cramped areas above the shower
    stall, a small bulkhead to hide a gas pipe, even a shelf where the block foundation narrowed from 12" to 8". No way I could do it right. Still couldn't.

    Before I hung the drywall I mentioned to him that I could save a lot of drywall if I didn't have to worry about eliminating all butt joints. He said "Don't worry
    about it. I'll just flat tape the butt joints. You won't see the difference."

    He was right.

    Hanging, I can do. Mudding & taping just isn't in my genes. When I asked the guy if my drywall hanging was OK, he said "I'd follow you anytime." ;-)

    YMMV as may your walls.
    No kidding.

    Tru dat!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 13 12:40:04 2021
    On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:20:28 -0500, Markem618 <markrm618@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:51:32 -0400, krw@notreal.com wrote:

    On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:34:35 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:0r9vlg92o466tj5ikg875c620khgjoe64l@4ax.com...

    On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:25:56 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >>>><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Putting the 2' piece at the bottom (or top for that matter) leaves you >>>>>with
    the sheets joining at tapered edges... a flat joint. Prefill the joint >>>>>with
    hot mud (setting joint compound) then tape and top coat with at least two >>>>>coats. Done well you will not see the joints as they will appear flat. By >>>>>pre-filling the gap between panels with hot mud the panels will act as one >>>>>piece of drywall and you should not get a bulge or crack over time. The >>>>>down side of putting the cut edge at the ceiling is you don't have a >>>>>straight factory edge butted against the ceiling... In which case you >>>>>might
    not get as crisp of a corner as a result. Pre-fill the irregularities >>>>>with
    hot mud either way!

    Even if done right, you will see the seam if you can look straight
    down a long wall. Over time, it will only get worse.

    Just came across this video related to prefilling joints.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDgtX38KVM

    Makes sense but does "pre-filling" mean that you go around and put mud
    in all of the joints, then go back and tape or does it mean that you
    load the joint with mud then tape over it immediately?

    The pros who redid the sunroom, with the framing being a bit wonky
    taped after filling sanding a first coat but starting with a flat
    surface made for a great job.

    Odd. I thought the tapered edge was to hide the tape and first layer.
    It sounds like it didn't matter if it was a tapered or butt joint,
    they all got treated as butt joints.

    YMMV as may your walls.

    No kidding.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 13 21:26:43 2021
    wrote in message news:o9bcmgtg4c4j96s278f30cphq0tj6ou6sc@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:34:35 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" ><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Just came across this video related to prefilling joints.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDgtX38KVM

    Makes sense but does "pre-filling" mean that you go around and put mud
    in all of the joints, then go back and tape or does it mean that you
    load the joint with mud then tape over it immediately?

    Prefilling means to fill the joints, preferably with hot mud (e.g.,
    Durabond), allowing that to set, and then taping. Hot mud is like plaster,
    it hardens through a chemical process and has little to no shrinkage.

    You could also prefill with All Purpose mud but, because that is an
    evaporative compound, big joints may take a day or more to dry and may
    shrink or crack. It is definitely better than not prefilling but it is
    slower and big gaps might need another prefill coat.

    Pre-filling does a couple things for you. One is that it fills the joint so that the sheets essentially become one...the gap cannot close up. Another benefit is that the taping mud under the tape will not shrink into the gap
    and leave the tape with a dip. Me, I prefill anything from an 1/8" and bigger... corners, flat joints, butt joints, walls, ceilings, any thing with
    a gap. It goes fast and depending on the setting time of the hot mud you use you can be taping in 20, 45, 90, ... minutes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 13 21:37:19 2021
    "DerbyDad03" wrote in message news:0cb74730-eae7-4ebe-8316-ecd87a08fcadn@googlegroups.com...

    Hanging, I can do. Mudding & taping just isn't in my genes. When I asked
    the
    guy if my drywall hanging was OK, he said "I'd follow you anytime." ;-)

    When you are the hanger and taper you watch out for yourself!

    I've noticed on my current project that hanging booboos and damaged sheets don't freak me out any more. This as I've learned a lot and have gotten a
    lot better at taping. I still avoid butt joints when I can by using 12'
    sheets, but buggered up sheet edges, broken corners, and bad cuts around electrical work boxes don't phase me any more. I also don't end up with the perpetual "the sheet is 1/4" too long" hanging problem as I don't try to
    make it exactly fit the space any more! ;~)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Wed Oct 13 23:05:37 2021
    On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 21:26:43 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:o9bcmgtg4c4j96s278f30cphq0tj6ou6sc@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:34:35 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Just came across this video related to prefilling joints.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDgtX38KVM

    Makes sense but does "pre-filling" mean that you go around and put mud
    in all of the joints, then go back and tape or does it mean that you
    load the joint with mud then tape over it immediately?

    Prefilling means to fill the joints, preferably with hot mud (e.g., >Durabond), allowing that to set, and then taping. Hot mud is like plaster, >it hardens through a chemical process and has little to no shrinkage.

    I like the 90 minute stuff for taping but it is more work. I'm a
    rank(est) armature and Durabond doesn't dissolve in water and it's
    harder making sanding actually easier. Of course there is some that's
    more sandable than others. My problem is mixing enough and not too
    much. I don't have a good way to mix it either.

    You could also prefill with All Purpose mud but, because that is an >evaporative compound, big joints may take a day or more to dry and may
    shrink or crack. It is definitely better than not prefilling but it is
    slower and big gaps might need another prefill coat.

    Pre-filling does a couple things for you. One is that it fills the joint so >that the sheets essentially become one...the gap cannot close up. Another >benefit is that the taping mud under the tape will not shrink into the gap >and leave the tape with a dip. Me, I prefill anything from an 1/8" and >bigger... corners, flat joints, butt joints, walls, ceilings, any thing with >a gap. It goes fast and depending on the setting time of the hot mud you use >you can be taping in 20, 45, 90, ... minutes.

    When you prefill do you fill just the gap? It sounded like they were
    saying to fill the taper too.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DerbyDad03@21:1/5 to John Grossbohlin on Thu Oct 14 07:07:14 2021
    On Wednesday, October 13, 2021 at 9:37:29 PM UTC-4, John Grossbohlin wrote:
    "DerbyDad03" wrote in message
    news:0cb74730-eae7-4ebe...@googlegroups.com...
    Hanging, I can do. Mudding & taping just isn't in my genes. When I asked >the
    guy if my drywall hanging was OK, he said "I'd follow you anytime." ;-)
    When you are the hanger and taper you watch out for yourself!

    I've noticed on my current project that hanging booboos and damaged sheets don't freak me out any more. This as I've learned a lot and have gotten a
    lot better at taping. I still avoid butt joints when I can by using 12' sheets, but buggered up sheet edges, broken corners, and bad cuts around electrical work boxes don't phase me any more. I also don't end up with the perpetual "the sheet is 1/4" too long" hanging problem as I don't try to
    make it exactly fit the space any more! ;~)

    I have tried taping many times over the years. I just can't get it right. Save yourself
    the trouble of offering tips. ;-) I've heard them all, I watched them all, I've taken
    live, hands-on lessons more than a few times. I just can't get it.

    I've done bondo, I've done fiberglassing, I've made really nice fillets out of thickened
    epoxy. All of that works out fine. I just can't tape drywall.

    When I recently remodeled my basement bathroom, precipitated by a leak that required the removal of some drywall, I did the drywall work myself. It took way too
    long and didn't come out anywhere near perfect. Tolerable, but not anything that
    I would have accepted had I paid for it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 14 15:24:52 2021
    On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 9:07:17 AM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
    Tolerable, but not anything that
    I would have accepted had I paid for it.

    Sadly, very sadly, I have that feeling a lot when I look at the numerous drywall fixes I've done in my current house. But strangely, the full sheet drywall job I did in the basement covering whole walls, I don't see any problems with the tape or mud.
    Someone might happily pay for that work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Thu Oct 14 22:36:43 2021
    wrote in message news:mb7fmg1pg51to6bclarslnp1und5adg8p5@4ax.com...

    On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 21:26:43 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:o9bcmgtg4c4j96s278f30cphq0tj6ou6sc@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:34:35 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Prefilling means to fill the joints, preferably with hot mud (e.g., >>Durabond), allowing that to set, and then taping. Hot mud is like
    plaster,
    it hardens through a chemical process and has little to no shrinkage.

    I like the 90 minute stuff for taping but it is more work. I'm a
    rank(est) armature and Durabond doesn't dissolve in water and it's
    harder making sanding actually easier. Of course there is some that's
    more sandable than others. My problem is mixing enough and not too
    much. I don't have a good way to mix it either.

    Durabond isn't known for its sandability... ;~) If you use it for the
    prefill and taping, and make it reasonably smooth, you can always finish
    with all purpose. Then you can sand easily.

    One advantage of using hot mud to tape is you can use the self adhesive mesh tape. Put the tape up (if it doesn't stick well use spray adhesive) and then apply the hot mud. Mesh tape is supposed to be used with setting compound,
    not the evaporative type. That process might be easier than using paper tape for some folks.

    Me, my current method is to put thinned all purpose or ultra light weight
    mud on the tape and then put it in place on the wall/ceiling. At least for
    me, that goes much faster and you get an even layer of mud under the tape as compared to putting the mud on the joint with a knife and then putting the
    tape on. I found an in expensive device that works well and is simple to
    use... far less complicated than other devices I tried. It's called a TapeBuddy. Amazon has them.


    You could also prefill with All Purpose mud but, because that is an >>evaporative compound, big joints may take a day or more to dry and may >>shrink or crack. It is definitely better than not prefilling but it is >>slower and big gaps might need another prefill coat.

    Pre-filling does a couple things for you. One is that it fills the joint
    so
    that the sheets essentially become one...the gap cannot close up. Another >>benefit is that the taping mud under the tape will not shrink into the gap >>and leave the tape with a dip. Me, I prefill anything from an 1/8" and >>bigger... corners, flat joints, butt joints, walls, ceilings, any thing >>with
    a gap. It goes fast and depending on the setting time of the hot mud you >>use
    you can be taping in 20, 45, 90, ... minutes.

    When you prefill do you fill just the gap? It sounded like they were
    saying to fill the taper too.

    Just the gaps. It makes no sense to me to prefill the taper before taping.
    If you did that it would be like taping a butt joint instead of a flat
    joint...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Fri Oct 15 22:53:39 2021
    On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 22:36:43 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:mb7fmg1pg51to6bclarslnp1und5adg8p5@4ax.com...

    On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 21:26:43 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" ><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:o9bcmgtg4c4j96s278f30cphq0tj6ou6sc@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:34:35 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >>><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Prefilling means to fill the joints, preferably with hot mud (e.g., >>>Durabond), allowing that to set, and then taping. Hot mud is like >>>plaster,
    it hardens through a chemical process and has little to no shrinkage.

    I like the 90 minute stuff for taping but it is more work. I'm a
    rank(est) armature and Durabond doesn't dissolve in water and it's
    harder making sanding actually easier. Of course there is some that's
    more sandable than others. My problem is mixing enough and not too
    much. I don't have a good way to mix it either.

    Durabond isn't known for its sandability... ;~) If you use it for the
    prefill and taping, and make it reasonably smooth, you can always finish
    with all purpose. Then you can sand easily.

    It's not like the premix but this is what I was referring to:

    <https://www.homedepot.com/p/USG-Sheetrock-Brand-18-lb-Easy-Sand-90-Lightweight-Setting-Type-Joint-Compound-384211/100321611?MERCH=REC-_-searchViewed-_-NA-_-100321611-_-N>

    One advantage of using hot mud to tape is you can use the self adhesive mesh >tape. Put the tape up (if it doesn't stick well use spray adhesive) and then >apply the hot mud. Mesh tape is supposed to be used with setting compound, >not the evaporative type. That process might be easier than using paper tape >for some folks.

    That answers a lot of questions. I've tried using the mesh tape on
    premix mud. It doesn't come out so well. Maybe with some real
    adhesive.

    Me, my current method is to put thinned all purpose or ultra light weight
    mud on the tape and then put it in place on the wall/ceiling. At least for >me, that goes much faster and you get an even layer of mud under the tape as >compared to putting the mud on the joint with a knife and then putting the >tape on. I found an in expensive device that works well and is simple to >use... far less complicated than other devices I tried. It's called a >TapeBuddy. Amazon has them.

    Evidently the prefill doesn't have completely fill the gap? It
    doesn't seem that there is enough mud on the tape to fill it.

    How does TapeBuddy compare with a banjo?


    You could also prefill with All Purpose mud but, because that is an >>>evaporative compound, big joints may take a day or more to dry and may >>>shrink or crack. It is definitely better than not prefilling but it is >>>slower and big gaps might need another prefill coat.

    Pre-filling does a couple things for you. One is that it fills the joint >>>so
    that the sheets essentially become one...the gap cannot close up. Another >>>benefit is that the taping mud under the tape will not shrink into the gap >>>and leave the tape with a dip. Me, I prefill anything from an 1/8" and >>>bigger... corners, flat joints, butt joints, walls, ceilings, any thing >>>with
    a gap. It goes fast and depending on the setting time of the hot mud you >>>use
    you can be taping in 20, 45, 90, ... minutes.

    When you prefill do you fill just the gap? It sounded like they were >>saying to fill the taper too.

    Just the gaps. It makes no sense to me to prefill the taper before taping.
    If you did that it would be like taping a butt joint instead of a flat >joint...

    That's what I was thinking but who knows. Some masochist might like
    butt joints.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Sat Oct 16 18:09:52 2021
    wrote in message news:9pekmg13u9fi5kk1tg3jap5o1hchcvs10g@4ax.com...

    On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 22:36:43 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Evidently the prefill doesn't have completely fill the gap? It
    doesn't seem that there is enough mud on the tape to fill it.

    The idea is to fill the gaps but not the tapers. If you have very narrow
    gaps, or no gaps, there is no need to prefill. Narrow gaps will typically
    fill with the taping mud. Some guys advise hanging with bigger gaps or
    making the gaps bigger with a knife and prefilling everything.

    How does TapeBuddy compare with a banjo?


    The same but different animal... ;~) The banjo holds tape and mud and is carried to the joint and moved along the joint to apply the mudded tape. Whereas with the TapeBuddy holds the tape and mud and sits on top of a joint compound bucket (has notches to fit on the bucket) and you pull out a length
    of tape and cut it to length (corner of a joint compound knife) and then
    move the mudded tape to the joint and apply it. Generally you don't pull out more than two arms length... multiple pieces to do a long flat joint is no problem and butt joints are never more and 4.5 feet (unless perhaps you
    stuff a narrow piece of rock between two horizontal sheets!). With the TapeBuddy you are only carrying around the mudded tape and not a bunch of
    tape, mud and steel (or aluminum) so it's less fatiguing to use for mere mortals.

    The host of these videos, Ben, is amusing and irreverent and knows what he's doing even if he's goofing around for the video. The video on the TapeBuddy also mentions prefilling and opening up the gaps to do so...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU1vcqklwoA&t=9s vs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojyrmm5jIBI&t=309s

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Sat Oct 16 20:44:13 2021
    On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:09:52 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:9pekmg13u9fi5kk1tg3jap5o1hchcvs10g@4ax.com...

    On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 22:36:43 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" ><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    Evidently the prefill doesn't have completely fill the gap? It
    doesn't seem that there is enough mud on the tape to fill it.

    The idea is to fill the gaps but not the tapers. If you have very narrow >gaps, or no gaps, there is no need to prefill. Narrow gaps will typically >fill with the taping mud. Some guys advise hanging with bigger gaps or
    making the gaps bigger with a knife and prefilling everything.

    How does TapeBuddy compare with a banjo?


    The same but different animal... ;~) The banjo holds tape and mud and is >carried to the joint and moved along the joint to apply the mudded tape. >Whereas with the TapeBuddy holds the tape and mud and sits on top of a joint >compound bucket (has notches to fit on the bucket) and you pull out a length >of tape and cut it to length (corner of a joint compound knife) and then
    move the mudded tape to the joint and apply it. Generally you don't pull out >more than two arms length... multiple pieces to do a long flat joint is no >problem and butt joints are never more and 4.5 feet (unless perhaps you
    stuff a narrow piece of rock between two horizontal sheets!). With the >TapeBuddy you are only carrying around the mudded tape and not a bunch of >tape, mud and steel (or aluminum) so it's less fatiguing to use for mere >mortals.

    The host of these videos, Ben, is amusing and irreverent and knows what he's >doing even if he's goofing around for the video. The video on the TapeBuddy >also mentions prefilling and opening up the gaps to do so...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU1vcqklwoA&t=9s vs.

    I can see that it would take a bit of arm muscle for the banjo. This
    was a very good tutorial. I'd like to have seen the outside corner
    but youtube is big enough to find it elsewhere.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojyrmm5jIBI&t=309s

    That's really slick. I noticed that he used the quick set chemical
    reaction type mud in the first video and the evaporative stuff in the
    second. Is there a reason for this (either one)?

    He made a comment about not overlapping tape on a butt joint but
    didn't say what the alternative was. Just baking sure the tape was
    long enough to cover the entire joint? What about ceilings/wall
    corners? I also have wall butt joints that go 8'. Perhaps bad
    planning but that's how it worked out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 17 21:04:27 2021
    wrote in message news:eurmmg9togqq01a73uuprf99859cdlq4mj@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:09:52 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" ><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    The host of these videos, Ben, is amusing and irreverent and knows what >>he's
    doing even if he's goofing around for the video. The video on the >>TapeBuddy
    also mentions prefilling and opening up the gaps to do so...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU1vcqklwoA&t=9s vs.

    I can see that it would take a bit of arm muscle for the banjo. This
    was a very good tutorial. I'd like to have seen the outside corner
    but youtube is big enough to find it elsewhere.

    Look at Ben's channel. He discusses the outside corners... steel, paper, fastening, etc.

    Other channels to review are That Kilted Guy, or The Drywall Doctor. They
    all offer quality information with some variance in technique.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojyrmm5jIBI&t=309s

    That's really slick. I noticed that he used the quick set chemical
    reaction type mud in the first video and the evaporative stuff in the
    second. Is there a reason for this (either one)?

    I suspect it is because the garage job was a quick and relatively small job
    and using setting mud would let him finish it in one day. Bigger jobs that take longer to apply each coat can wait over night for another coat.

    He made a comment about not overlapping tape on a butt joint but
    didn't say what the alternative was. Just baking sure the tape was
    long enough to cover the entire joint? What about ceilings/wall
    corners? I also have wall butt joints that go 8'. Perhaps bad
    planning but that's how it worked out.

    When he says "butt joint" he's referring to the 4' ends of sheets meeting
    each others, NOT corner joints at wall and ceiling intersections..they are corners. Generally, when you hang rock you stagger the butt joints. That
    way you shouldn't have a joint longer than 4' (or 4.5').

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill@21:1/5 to John Grossbohlin on Sun Oct 17 22:02:24 2021
    On 10/17/2021 9:04 PM, John Grossbohlin wrote:

    What about ceilings/wall corners?  I also have wall butt joints that go 8'.  Perhaps bad
    planning but that's how it worked out.

    Once you have the mud up there, you'll do what you have to do to make it
    work, one piece of tape or three pieces. Just watch a YouTube video
    first. In fact, you may start with one piece, and go back the next day,
    rip some off, find that you have three after that. The single thing
    which immensely improved the quality of my taping the most was to dunk
    the paper tape into water first. After that it got embedded in the mud
    "real good"! Before I started doing that, there were places where the
    tape dried with air gaps. The single thing I remember learning (from a
    book) about inside corners is not to put more mud "in" the corner once
    you've taped it the first time. Taping drywall makes me feel like an
    artist with a pallet, you just probably wouldn't want to pay me by the
    hour! %-) Also remember, usually, nothing that comes off should go back
    into the bucket. I read the book "Drywall", by M. Ferguson before my
    drywall project. I think I taped my first joint at least 3 times before
    I was satisfied--using wet tape the last time! Tape and mud are really
    cheap, don't be ashamed to ask for a "do-over"! : ) I'm the same
    poster who suggested using a halogen lamp too (after sanding).
    I also recommend a sanding pole you can attach to your shop-vac (with appropriate bag and filter), for the sake of your health. The price is reasonable. If any experts think they know better than me, it's probably
    true, and I defer to them. Good luck and have fun!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Bill on Mon Oct 18 01:09:17 2021
    On Sunday, October 17, 2021 at 9:02:30 PM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
    On 10/17/2021 9:04 PM, John Grossbohlin wrote:

    What about ceilings/wall corners? I also have wall butt joints that go 8'. Perhaps bad
    planning but that's how it worked out.
    Once you have the mud up there, you'll do what you have to do to make it work, one piece of tape or three pieces. Just watch a YouTube video
    first. In fact, you may start with one piece, and go back the next day,
    rip some off, find that you have three after that. The single thing
    which immensely improved the quality of my taping the most was to dunk
    the paper tape into water first. After that it got embedded in the mud
    "real good"! Before I started doing that, there were places where the
    tape dried with air gaps. The single thing I remember learning (from a
    book) about inside corners is not to put more mud "in" the corner once
    you've taped it the first time. Taping drywall makes me feel like an
    artist with a pallet, you just probably wouldn't want to pay me by the
    hour! %-) Also remember, usually, nothing that comes off should go back
    into the bucket. I read the book "Drywall", by M. Ferguson before my
    drywall project. I think I taped my first joint at least 3 times before
    I was satisfied--using wet tape the last time! Tape and mud are really
    cheap, don't be ashamed to ask for a "do-over"! : ) I'm the same
    poster who suggested using a halogen lamp too (after sanding).
    I also recommend a sanding pole you can attach to your shop-vac (with appropriate bag and filter), for the sake of your health. The price is reasonable. If any experts think they know better than me, it's probably true, and I defer to them. Good luck and have fun!

    Have fun? With drywall taping and mudding? What world are you living in?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill@21:1/5 to russellseaton1@yahoo.com on Mon Oct 18 08:49:51 2021
    On 10/18/2021 4:09 AM, russellseaton1@yahoo.com wrote:

    Have fun? With drywall taping and mudding? What world are you living in?


    You make it sound so dry... like Durabond 90! ; )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Bill on Mon Oct 18 10:08:07 2021
    On Monday, October 18, 2021 at 7:49:56 AM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
    On 10/18/2021 4:09 AM, russell...@yahoo.com wrote:

    Have fun? With drywall taping and mudding? What world are you living in?

    You make it sound so dry... like Durabond 90! ; )

    Not sure about dry. But I have sanded drywall dry. But now I like to use a wet rag to smooth the dried mud out. That is much better. As for fun, the most fun I ever had hanging drywall, and taping and mudding it, was when I was all done with the job.
    Then I would party, sort of. Unlike electrical, which I love to do, I just don't get any joy at all out of drywall. I wish I never ever had to hang or patch drywall ever again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to ritzannaseaton@gmail.com on Mon Oct 18 15:44:03 2021
    On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:08:07 -0700 (PDT), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, October 18, 2021 at 7:49:56 AM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
    On 10/18/2021 4:09 AM, russell...@yahoo.com wrote:

    Have fun? With drywall taping and mudding? What world are you living in? >> >
    You make it sound so dry... like Durabond 90! ; )

    Not sure about dry. But I have sanded drywall dry. But now I like to use a wet rag to smooth the dried mud out. That is much better. As for fun, the most fun I ever had hanging drywall, and taping and mudding it, was when I was all done with the job.
    Then I would party, sort of. Unlike electrical, which I love to do, I just don't get any joy at all out of drywall. I wish I never ever had to hang or patch drywall ever again.
    It IS one of the worst jobs - next to wall-papering - - - -
    Not far behind is repairing leaking plumbing pipes where there is
    always a little bit more water finding it's way to the repair site.
    Sometimes it is enough to make me go for a shark-byte.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From knuttle@21:1/5 to Clare Snyder on Mon Oct 18 17:42:17 2021
    On 10/18/2021 3:44 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:08:07 -0700 (PDT), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, October 18, 2021 at 7:49:56 AM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
    On 10/18/2021 4:09 AM, russell...@yahoo.com wrote:

    Have fun? With drywall taping and mudding? What world are you living in? >>>>
    You make it sound so dry... like Durabond 90! ; )

    Not sure about dry. But I have sanded drywall dry. But now I like to use a wet rag to smooth the dried mud out. That is much better. As for fun, the most fun I ever had hanging drywall, and taping and mudding it, was when I was all done with the
    job. Then I would party, sort of. Unlike electrical, which I love to do, I just don't get any joy at all out of drywall. I wish I never ever had to hang or patch drywall ever again.
    It IS one of the worst jobs - next to wall-papering - - - -
    Not far behind is repairing leaking plumbing pipes where there is
    always a little bit more water finding it's way to the repair site.
    Sometimes it is enough to make me go for a shark-byte.

    The worst job fixing a clogged sewer pipe, where you must open it to get
    access for the snake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to Bill on Mon Oct 18 17:46:19 2021
    "Bill" wrote in message news:RA4bJ.241324$T_8.65219@fx48.iad...

    Once you have the mud up there, you'll do what you have to do to make it >work, one piece of tape or three pieces. Just watch a YouTube video first.
    In fact, you may start with one piece, and go back the next day, rip some >off, find that you have three after that. The single thing which immensely >improved the quality of my taping the most was to dunk the paper tape into >water first. After that it got embedded in the mud "real good"! Before I >started doing that, there were places where the tape dried with air gaps.
    The single thing I remember learning (from a

    Those problems are all but eliminated with a tool like the TapeBuddy... no wetting of the paper tape is needed and you get a good even coat on the
    paper with a little practice.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Mon Oct 18 21:36:12 2021
    On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:46:19 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    "Bill" wrote in message news:RA4bJ.241324$T_8.65219@fx48.iad...

    Once you have the mud up there, you'll do what you have to do to make it >>work, one piece of tape or three pieces. Just watch a YouTube video first. >>In fact, you may start with one piece, and go back the next day, rip some >>off, find that you have three after that. The single thing which immensely >>improved the quality of my taping the most was to dunk the paper tape into >>water first. After that it got embedded in the mud "real good"! Before I >>started doing that, there were places where the tape dried with air gaps. >>The single thing I remember learning (from a

    Those problems are all but eliminated with a tool like the TapeBuddy... no >wetting of the paper tape is needed and you get a good even coat on the
    paper with a little practice.
    Nothing like a Bazooka -- similar to the "banjo" mentioned earlier.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Clare Snyder on Mon Oct 18 22:02:05 2021
    On Monday, October 18, 2021 at 2:44:07 PM UTC-5, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:08:07 -0700 (PDT), "russell...@yahoo.com" <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, October 18, 2021 at 7:49:56 AM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
    On 10/18/2021 4:09 AM, russell...@yahoo.com wrote:

    Have fun? With drywall taping and mudding? What world are you living in?

    You make it sound so dry... like Durabond 90! ; )

    Not sure about dry. But I have sanded drywall dry. But now I like to use a wet rag to smooth the dried mud out. That is much better. As for fun, the most fun I ever had hanging drywall, and taping and mudding it, was when I was all done with the job.
    Then I would party, sort of. Unlike electrical, which I love to do, I just don't get any joy at all out of drywall. I wish I never ever had to hang or patch drywall ever again.
    It IS one of the worst jobs - next to wall-papering - - - -
    Not far behind is repairing leaking plumbing pipes where there is
    always a little bit more water finding it's way to the repair site. Sometimes it is enough to make me go for a shark-byte.

    I hates plumbing. I've been forced to do more than I want over the years. I'd rank plumbing lower into the cauldrons of H-LL than drywall.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill@21:1/5 to russellseaton1@yahoo.com on Tue Oct 19 01:56:04 2021
    On 10/18/2021 1:08 PM, russellseaton1@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 18, 2021 at 7:49:56 AM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
    On 10/18/2021 4:09 AM, russell...@yahoo.com wrote:

    Have fun? With drywall taping and mudding? What world are you living in? >>>
    You make it sound so dry... like Durabond 90! ; )

    Not sure about dry. But I have sanded drywall dry. But now I like to use a wet rag to smooth the dried mud out. That is much better. As for fun, the most fun I ever had hanging drywall, and taping and mudding it, was when I was all done with the
    job. Then I would party, sort of. Unlike electrical, which I love to do, I just don't get any joy at all out of drywall. I wish I never ever had to hang or patch drywall ever again.


    I enjoy the challenge of taping good joints, and doing it as efficiently
    as I can. I enjoy knowing that I can do a drywall job from start to
    finish by myself because I have already done it. It's true that I have
    wasted a few 4x8 sheets of drywall due to my "cut-out skills", but I
    attribute that as part of the cost of my education.

    This past summer, I painted my deck: power-spraying, sanding, and
    painting, basically 5 days in all, but not in a row, and none of them
    were (full) 8-hour days. If I had to choose, I prefer taping and
    mudding... : ) I know that the amount of pleasure that one can derive
    from any job changes if one does it full-time for 40-hours/week. But, I
    enjoy trying to be a DIY-er. This summer I replaced the headlight
    assemblies in my wife's car. To my surprise it only took me (only) 75
    minutes (thanks YouTube). I'm not sure how much money I saved by doing
    that, but suspect it was reasonably significant. Possessing and knowing
    how to use tools is "fun", right? And even using them can be fun, if
    done in moderation! ; ) I never plan to surrender my collection of
    drywall knives! :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Grossbohlin@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Tue Oct 19 12:49:47 2021
    "Clare Snyder" wrote in message news:158smg9ldglhcl793ef0kircekmoqtkiog@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:46:19 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    "Bill" wrote in message news:RA4bJ.241324$T_8.65219@fx48.iad...

    Once you have the mud up there, you'll do what you have to do to make it >>work, one piece of tape or three pieces. Just watch a YouTube video first. >>In fact, you may start with one piece, and go back the next day, rip some >>off, find that you have three after that. The single thing which immensely >>improved the quality of my taping the most was to dunk the paper tape into >>water first. After that it got embedded in the mud "real good"! Before I >>started doing that, there were places where the tape dried with air gaps. >>The single thing I remember learning (from a

    Those problems are all but eliminated with a tool like the TapeBuddy... no >wetting of the paper tape is needed and you get a good even coat on the
    paper with a little practice.
    Nothing like a Bazooka -- similar to the "banjo" mentioned earlier.

    For a pro... yes. For the occasional handyman or homeowner taper not so
    much... expense and experience issues.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Tue Oct 19 19:09:42 2021
    On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 21:04:27 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    wrote in message news:eurmmg9togqq01a73uuprf99859cdlq4mj@4ax.com...

    On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:09:52 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" >><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    The host of these videos, Ben, is amusing and irreverent and knows what >>>he's
    doing even if he's goofing around for the video. The video on the >>>TapeBuddy
    also mentions prefilling and opening up the gaps to do so...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU1vcqklwoA&t=9s vs.

    I can see that it would take a bit of arm muscle for the banjo. This
    was a very good tutorial. I'd like to have seen the outside corner
    but youtube is big enough to find it elsewhere.

    Look at Ben's channel. He discusses the outside corners... steel, paper, >fastening, etc.

    Other channels to review are That Kilted Guy, or The Drywall Doctor. They >all offer quality information with some variance in technique.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojyrmm5jIBI&t=309s

    That's really slick. I noticed that he used the quick set chemical >>reaction type mud in the first video and the evaporative stuff in the >>second. Is there a reason for this (either one)?

    I suspect it is because the garage job was a quick and relatively small job >and using setting mud would let him finish it in one day. Bigger jobs that >take longer to apply each coat can wait over night for another coat.

    I've always had the problem of the second (and subsequent) coats of
    premix softening the previous, then having the knife catch the tape
    and rip it up. I've only used the mesh and now I find out that I'm
    supposed to be using the plaster-of-paris type with the mesh. It
    makes sense now.

    He made a comment about not overlapping tape on a butt joint but
    didn't say what the alternative was. Just baking sure the tape was
    long enough to cover the entire joint? What about ceilings/wall
    corners? I also have wall butt joints that go 8'. Perhaps bad
    planning but that's how it worked out.

    When he says "butt joint" he's referring to the 4' ends of sheets meeting >each others, NOT corner joints at wall and ceiling intersections..they are >corners. Generally, when you hang rock you stagger the butt joints. That
    way you shouldn't have a joint longer than 4' (or 4.5').

    I was thinking that the same problem occurred with any joint without
    the taper. OTOH, tapers in the corners or at the ceiling would make
    life tough and you don't look down the wall and notice the corner
    bumping out. Corners aren't as obvious.

    I can see that now but I've put them together to save a sheet.

    Good videos on YouTube. Lots of great information. I can hardly
    wait to get back at it (NOT).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.ne on Tue Oct 19 22:11:00 2021
    On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:49:47 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" <nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    "Clare Snyder" wrote in message >news:158smg9ldglhcl793ef0kircekmoqtkiog@4ax.com...

    On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:46:19 -0400, "John Grossbohlin" ><nospam.grossboj@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote:

    "Bill" wrote in message news:RA4bJ.241324$T_8.65219@fx48.iad...

    Once you have the mud up there, you'll do what you have to do to make it >>>work, one piece of tape or three pieces. Just watch a YouTube video first. >>>In fact, you may start with one piece, and go back the next day, rip some >>>off, find that you have three after that. The single thing which immensely >>>improved the quality of my taping the most was to dunk the paper tape into >>>water first. After that it got embedded in the mud "real good"! Before I >>>started doing that, there were places where the tape dried with air gaps. >>>The single thing I remember learning (from a

    Those problems are all but eliminated with a tool like the TapeBuddy... no >>wetting of the paper tape is needed and you get a good even coat on the >>paper with a little practice.
    Nothing like a Bazooka -- similar to the "banjo" mentioned earlier.

    For a pro... yes. For the occasional handyman or homeowner taper not so >much... expense and experience issues.
    For sure. When I did my daughter's basement I did all the rocking
    and an old german friend came over and taped and mudded it for me in appreciation for help I gave him on his plane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)