• MFT/3?

    From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 5 20:56:01 2022
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to k...@notreal.com on Sun Nov 6 00:46:36 2022
    On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 7:56:06 PM UTC-5, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?


    No comment from me. I have a vague idea of what the MFT/3 is. A MDF table top with some size of mm holes drilled in it in a grid pattern. And you can use the newer Festool rails and track saw and maybe router on top of it. And expensive posts and
    other things fit into the mm holes. I never understood the appeal of it. Why not just use your table saw or miter saw to cut the wood? Or if using the track saw to cut the wood, just toss the wood onto a Styrofoam panel, lay the guide on top, and cut
    with the track saw.

    Now, I will admit to creating my own MFT style table. I glued and screwed a set of 2x4s together to make a frame. Then have a piece of particleboard to sit on top. And some pipe sockets and pipes to make legs on the bottom. I can lay pieces of wood
    on top and straight line rip the edges with the track saw. Then feed the pieces into my table saw to rip to width. Its kind of an elevated Styrofoam panel so I don't have to crawl around on the floor.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to ritzannaseaton@gmail.com on Sun Nov 6 19:34:00 2022
    On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 00:46:36 -0700 (PDT), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 7:56:06 PM UTC-5, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?


    No comment from me. I have a vague idea of what the MFT/3 is. A MDF table top with some size of mm holes drilled in it in a grid pattern. And you can use the newer Festool rails and track saw and maybe router on top of it. And expensive posts and
    other things fit into the mm holes. I never understood the appeal of it. Why not just use your table saw or miter saw to cut the wood? Or if using the track saw to cut the wood, just toss the wood onto a Styrofoam panel, lay the guide on top, and cut
    with the track saw.

    I wasn't much interested until the Festool travlin' road show. They
    were demonstrating some other tools, using the MFT. The setup is very
    fast and they (of course) were making it look really good. I went
    back Saturday to look closer without a bunch of Festool employees
    standing around me. I was disappointed but could still be talked into
    it by someone who uses one every day. There are just some things
    about the rail mechanism (the MFT's bottom line) that didn't sit well.
    It could have been so much more robust.

    Now, I will admit to creating my own MFT style table. I glued and screwed a set of 2x4s together to make a frame. Then have a piece of particleboard to sit on top. And some pipe sockets and pipes to make legs on the bottom. I can lay pieces of wood
    on top and straight line rip the edges with the track saw. Then feed the pieces into my table saw to rip to width. Its kind of an elevated Styrofoam panel so I don't have to crawl around on the floor.

    I have a table with a sheet of MDF on a solid-core door, with edge
    banding to hold the MDF from moving (it's just sitting there so can be
    replaced easily). It's great for "ripping" panels down to size but not
    so great at "cross-cutting".

    I plan on drilling dog holes in it but haven't decided on the US 3/4"
    or European (Festool) 20mm holes. Since the table is so thick (2",
    IIRC) passing the clamps from the bottom isn't going to work but
    surface clamps will, which is always a problem.

    Since I always work alone and really can't moose full sheets around
    like I once did (particularly now) so the table saw isn't very
    user-friendly. I'd like to use it just for ripping and small parts.
    The MFT is set up to make short work of "cross-cutting" panels. If
    it were a little better, it could put a miter saw out to pasture.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to k...@notreal.com on Mon Nov 7 19:22:26 2022
    On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 6:34:06 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 00:46:36 -0700 (PDT), "russell...@yahoo.com" <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 7:56:06 PM UTC-5, k...@notreal.com wrote: >> I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?


    No comment from me. I have a vague idea of what the MFT/3 is. A MDF table top with some size of mm holes drilled in it in a grid pattern. And you can use the newer Festool rails and track saw and maybe router on top of it. And expensive posts and
    other things fit into the mm holes. I never understood the appeal of it. Why not just use your table saw or miter saw to cut the wood? Or if using the track saw to cut the wood, just toss the wood onto a Styrofoam panel, lay the guide on top, and cut
    with the track saw.
    I wasn't much interested until the Festool travlin' road show. They
    were demonstrating some other tools, using the MFT. The setup is very
    fast and they (of course) were making it look really good. I went
    back Saturday to look closer without a bunch of Festool employees
    standing around me. I was disappointed but could still be talked into
    it by someone who uses one every day. There are just some things
    about the rail mechanism (the MFT's bottom line) that didn't sit well.
    It could have been so much more robust.
    Now, I will admit to creating my own MFT style table. I glued and screwed a set of 2x4s together to make a frame. Then have a piece of particleboard to sit on top. And some pipe sockets and pipes to make legs on the bottom. I can lay pieces of wood on
    top and straight line rip the edges with the track saw. Then feed the pieces into my table saw to rip to width. Its kind of an elevated Styrofoam panel so I don't have to crawl around on the floor.
    I have a table with a sheet of MDF on a solid-core door, with edge
    banding to hold the MDF from moving (it's just sitting there so can be replaced easily). It's great for "ripping" panels down to size but not
    so great at "cross-cutting".

    I plan on drilling dog holes in it but haven't decided on the US 3/4"
    or European (Festool) 20mm holes. Since the table is so thick (2",
    IIRC) passing the clamps from the bottom isn't going to work but
    surface clamps will, which is always a problem.

    Since I always work alone and really can't moose full sheets around
    like I once did (particularly now) so the table saw isn't very user-friendly. I'd like to use it just for ripping and small parts.
    The MFT is set up to make short work of "cross-cutting" panels. If
    it were a little better, it could put a miter saw out to pasture.

    Again, I have no direct experience with the MFT table. Just seen pictures of it and read lots of comments from devotees about how wonderous it is. But I can't figure out why its so wonderful. I already own a SCMS that crosscuts 12 inches. I guess I
    could put in stop blocks on one side and flip the piece over so it would then crosscut 24 inches. Maybe that would work OK. SCMS cost $500 lets say. I also own a table saw. Its old now. Delta Contractors saw. I can crosscut and rip with it pretty
    darn good. Now, I agree working with full plywood sheets is cumbersome. Best to use the track saw and a Styrofoam panel first to cut the plywood down to size. Or to straight line rip an edge on long boards. I probably have at least $1000 over the
    decades invested into the table saw. Track saw and rails are of course expensive too. But you have to have a track saw and rails to make the MFT work. So you have to buy a track saw no matter what. MFT by itself is $775. Comes with a 42" rail. It
    can cut 42" by 27". So you still need to buy a new longer rail to even crosscut a 4' x 8' sheet of plywood on the floor before you can even put it on the MFT. And a long rail to rip the plywood on its 8 foot side. And in addition to the $775 base cost,
    you still "need" to buy all the extra doo-dads for several hundreds of extra dollars. So the MFT table is over $1000 before its in its wonderous state.

    As I said, I already own a SCMS. Probably don't need that, but I already bought it. So not going to get rid of it. And I have a table saw that does everything the MFT does. For less money. And I own a track saw and rails. Which you have to buy to
    use the MFT, so that is a wash. What would a MFT do that I cannot already do now? And I can probably do everything better now too. And faster.

    Now, I can understand the appeal of the MFT in certain situations. You are a traveling carpenter living in your van. And all of your cutting is done with the MFT. And you pull it out of the van and set it up on the grass to do all your work. Might
    make sense in that situation. Or maybe you are moving into the retirement home and you only have a 10' by 10' room as your shop. So you have to sell all your other tools first before moving in. And now you need something tiny to use in your new tiny
    shop. And you can carry the lightweight Styrofoam panel out onto the retirement home's center lawn when you need to cut a piece of plywood down to size. Before it can even fit on the MFT table inside your tiny shop.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to ritzannaseaton@gmail.com on Tue Nov 8 14:21:48 2022
    On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:22:26 -0800 (PST), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 6:34:06 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 00:46:36 -0700 (PDT), "russell...@yahoo.com"
    <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 7:56:06 PM UTC-5, k...@notreal.com wrote: >> >> I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?


    No comment from me. I have a vague idea of what the MFT/3 is. A MDF table top with some size of mm holes drilled in it in a grid pattern. And you can use the newer Festool rails and track saw and maybe router on top of it. And expensive posts and
    other things fit into the mm holes. I never understood the appeal of it. Why not just use your table saw or miter saw to cut the wood? Or if using the track saw to cut the wood, just toss the wood onto a Styrofoam panel, lay the guide on top, and cut
    with the track saw.
    I wasn't much interested until the Festool travlin' road show. They
    were demonstrating some other tools, using the MFT. The setup is very
    fast and they (of course) were making it look really good. I went
    back Saturday to look closer without a bunch of Festool employees
    standing around me. I was disappointed but could still be talked into
    it by someone who uses one every day. There are just some things
    about the rail mechanism (the MFT's bottom line) that didn't sit well.
    It could have been so much more robust.
    Now, I will admit to creating my own MFT style table. I glued and screwed a set of 2x4s together to make a frame. Then have a piece of particleboard to sit on top. And some pipe sockets and pipes to make legs on the bottom. I can lay pieces of wood
    on top and straight line rip the edges with the track saw. Then feed the pieces into my table saw to rip to width. Its kind of an elevated Styrofoam panel so I don't have to crawl around on the floor.
    I have a table with a sheet of MDF on a solid-core door, with edge
    banding to hold the MDF from moving (it's just sitting there so can be
    replaced easily). It's great for "ripping" panels down to size but not
    so great at "cross-cutting".

    I plan on drilling dog holes in it but haven't decided on the US 3/4"
    or European (Festool) 20mm holes. Since the table is so thick (2",
    IIRC) passing the clamps from the bottom isn't going to work but
    surface clamps will, which is always a problem.

    Since I always work alone and really can't moose full sheets around
    like I once did (particularly now) so the table saw isn't very
    user-friendly. I'd like to use it just for ripping and small parts.
    The MFT is set up to make short work of "cross-cutting" panels. If
    it were a little better, it could put a miter saw out to pasture.

    Again, I have no direct experience with the MFT table. Just seen pictures of it and read lots of comments from devotees about how wonderous it is. But I can't figure out why its so wonderful. I already own a SCMS that crosscuts 12 inches. I guess I
    could put in stop blocks on one side and flip the piece over so it would then crosscut 24 inches. Maybe that would work OK. SCMS cost $500 lets say. I also own a table saw. Its old now. Delta Contractors saw. I can crosscut and rip with it pretty
    darn good. Now, I agree working with full plywood sheets is cumbersome. Best to use the track saw and a Styrofoam panel first to cut the plywood down to size. Or to straight line rip an edge on long boards. I probably have at least $1000 over the
    decades invested into the table saw. Track saw and rails are of course expensive too. But you have to have a track saw and rails to make the MFT work. So you have to buy a track saw no matter what. MFT by itself is $775. Comes with a
    42" rail. It can cut 42" by 27". So you still need to buy a new longer rail to even crosscut a 4' x 8' sheet of plywood on the floor before you can even put it on the MFT. And a long rail to rip the plywood on its 8 foot side. And in addition to the
    $775 base cost, you still "need" to buy all the extra doo-dads for several hundreds of extra dollars. So the MFT table is over $1000 before its in its wonderous state.

    You can buy a second and cut 8' pieces. ;-)

    As I said, I already own a SCMS. Probably don't need that, but I already bought it. So not going to get rid of it. And I have a table saw that does everything the MFT does. For less money. And I own a track saw and rails. Which you have to buy to
    use the MFT, so that is a wash. What would a MFT do that I cannot already do now? And I can probably do everything better now too. And faster.

    There are certain situations where neither the table saw or the track
    saw seem to be the right tool. The piece is big enough that I really
    don't want to use the table saw and setting the track up is a PITA for
    one cut. I've been thinking about getting a short track and just do
    that. I have enough track to build a railroad but nothing shorter
    than 55". I could cut one down on a track saw. ;-) I just might.

    Now, I can understand the appeal of the MFT in certain situations. You are a traveling carpenter living in your van. And all of your cutting is done with the MFT. And you pull it out of the van and set it up on the grass to do all your work. Might
    make sense in that situation. Or maybe you are moving into the retirement home and you only have a 10' by 10' room as your shop. So you have to sell all your other tools first before moving in. And now you need something tiny to use in your new tiny
    shop. And you can carry the lightweight Styrofoam panel out onto the retirement home's center lawn when you need to cut a piece of plywood down to size. Before it can even fit on the MFT table inside your tiny shop.

    No question they're great for installers. At 42#, hauling one around
    would be easy. I didn't like the wobbly legs, either but this would
    be an acceptable tradeoff for a mobile workstation. One of the
    attendees at the Festool show said that he put a shelf across the
    bottom rungs and it's fine. That defeats its purpose as a mobile saw
    but solves the wobblies, apparently. They have a router MFT table too.
    I *really* didn't like how wobbly it was. I know everything is
    referenced to the top and movement doesn't matter to the cut but I
    want to work on a solid bench.

    Leon has and MFT for his shop and loves it. I was hoping he was still
    around to answer questions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to k...@notreal.com on Tue Nov 8 12:53:51 2022
    On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 1:21:54 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:22:26 -0800 (PST), "russell...@yahoo.com" <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 6:34:06 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 00:46:36 -0700 (PDT), "russell...@yahoo.com"
    <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 7:56:06 PM UTC-5, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be >> >> missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group) >> >> but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >> >> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >> >> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >> >> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?


    No comment from me. I have a vague idea of what the MFT/3 is. A MDF table top with some size of mm holes drilled in it in a grid pattern. And you can use the newer Festool rails and track saw and maybe router on top of it. And expensive posts and
    other things fit into the mm holes. I never understood the appeal of it. Why not just use your table saw or miter saw to cut the wood? Or if using the track saw to cut the wood, just toss the wood onto a Styrofoam panel, lay the guide on top, and cut
    with the track saw.
    I wasn't much interested until the Festool travlin' road show. They
    were demonstrating some other tools, using the MFT. The setup is very
    fast and they (of course) were making it look really good. I went
    back Saturday to look closer without a bunch of Festool employees
    standing around me. I was disappointed but could still be talked into
    it by someone who uses one every day. There are just some things
    about the rail mechanism (the MFT's bottom line) that didn't sit well.
    It could have been so much more robust.
    Now, I will admit to creating my own MFT style table. I glued and screwed a set of 2x4s together to make a frame. Then have a piece of particleboard to sit on top. And some pipe sockets and pipes to make legs on the bottom. I can lay pieces of wood
    on top and straight line rip the edges with the track saw. Then feed the pieces into my table saw to rip to width. Its kind of an elevated Styrofoam panel so I don't have to crawl around on the floor.
    I have a table with a sheet of MDF on a solid-core door, with edge
    banding to hold the MDF from moving (it's just sitting there so can be
    replaced easily). It's great for "ripping" panels down to size but not
    so great at "cross-cutting".

    I plan on drilling dog holes in it but haven't decided on the US 3/4"
    or European (Festool) 20mm holes. Since the table is so thick (2",
    IIRC) passing the clamps from the bottom isn't going to work but
    surface clamps will, which is always a problem.

    Since I always work alone and really can't moose full sheets around
    like I once did (particularly now) so the table saw isn't very
    user-friendly. I'd like to use it just for ripping and small parts.
    The MFT is set up to make short work of "cross-cutting" panels. If
    it were a little better, it could put a miter saw out to pasture.

    Again, I have no direct experience with the MFT table. Just seen pictures of it and read lots of comments from devotees about how wonderous it is. But I can't figure out why its so wonderful. I already own a SCMS that crosscuts 12 inches. I guess I
    could put in stop blocks on one side and flip the piece over so it would then crosscut 24 inches. Maybe that would work OK. SCMS cost $500 lets say. I also own a table saw. Its old now. Delta Contractors saw. I can crosscut and rip with it pretty darn
    good. Now, I agree working with full plywood sheets is cumbersome. Best to use the track saw and a Styrofoam panel first to cut the plywood down to size. Or to straight line rip an edge on long boards. I probably have at least $1000 over the decades
    invested into the table saw. Track saw and rails are of course expensive too. But you have to have a track saw and rails to make the MFT work. So you have to buy a track saw no matter what. MFT by itself is $775. Comes with a
    42" rail. It can cut 42" by 27". So you still need to buy a new longer rail to even crosscut a 4' x 8' sheet of plywood on the floor before you can even put it on the MFT. And a long rail to rip the plywood on its 8 foot side. And in addition to the $
    775 base cost, you still "need" to buy all the extra doo-dads for several hundreds of extra dollars. So the MFT table is over $1000 before its in its wonderous state.
    You can buy a second and cut 8' pieces. ;-)
    As I said, I already own a SCMS. Probably don't need that, but I already bought it. So not going to get rid of it. And I have a table saw that does everything the MFT does. For less money. And I own a track saw and rails. Which you have to buy to use
    the MFT, so that is a wash. What would a MFT do that I cannot already do now? And I can probably do everything better now too. And faster.
    There are certain situations where neither the table saw or the track
    saw seem to be the right tool. The piece is big enough that I really
    don't want to use the table saw and setting the track up is a PITA for
    one cut. I've been thinking about getting a short track and just do
    that. I have enough track to build a railroad but nothing shorter
    than 55". I could cut one down on a track saw. ;-) I just might.
    Now, I can understand the appeal of the MFT in certain situations. You are a traveling carpenter living in your van. And all of your cutting is done with the MFT. And you pull it out of the van and set it up on the grass to do all your work. Might
    make sense in that situation. Or maybe you are moving into the retirement home and you only have a 10' by 10' room as your shop. So you have to sell all your other tools first before moving in. And now you need something tiny to use in your new tiny shop.
    And you can carry the lightweight Styrofoam panel out onto the retirement home's center lawn when you need to cut a piece of plywood down to size. Before it can even fit on the MFT table inside your tiny shop.
    No question they're great for installers. At 42#, hauling one around
    would be easy. I didn't like the wobbly legs, either but this would
    be an acceptable tradeoff for a mobile workstation. One of the
    attendees at the Festool show said that he put a shelf across the
    bottom rungs and it's fine. That defeats its purpose as a mobile saw
    but solves the wobblies, apparently. They have a router MFT table too.
    I *really* didn't like how wobbly it was. I know everything is
    referenced to the top and movement doesn't matter to the cut but I
    want to work on a solid bench.

    Leon has and MFT for his shop and loves it. I was hoping he was still
    around to answer questions.


    I am probably the wrong person to comment in this thread. Since I do not own an MFT and have never used it. Kind of like you. But I look at it and think, I already own tools that can do what the MFT does, but easier than the MFT. So why would I want
    an MFT? Unless there is a real reason, such as the space aspect or portability aspect. If a woodworker already owns all the tools, then the MFT does not seem like a good replacement. If you are just starting out and have nothing, then maybe the MFT is
    a good starter that means you never need anything else. Maybe. But I don't think you are talking about that type of situation.

    As for shorter rails, I own an 800mm (31"). Not the holey one. Regular rail. I use it a little. But its not much more convenient than the 1400. And if you are cutting short things that fit the 800 rail, then they are about short enough to cut with
    the table saw or SCMS.

    I like my Festool track saw. Its great. And great at many different cuts. But its bad at some cuts too. And the MFT seems to try to improve on the bad cuts. It probably helps. But there are other tools that are the very best for the bad track saw
    cuts. So why not just get the better other tool. Why try to improve on the track saw and get it just to mediocre. When you can get great with a different tool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to ritzannaseaton@gmail.com on Tue Nov 8 20:59:33 2022
    On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 12:53:51 -0800 (PST), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 1:21:54 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:22:26 -0800 (PST), "russell...@yahoo.com"
    <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 6:34:06 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 00:46:36 -0700 (PDT), "russell...@yahoo.com"
    <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 7:56:06 PM UTC-5, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be >> >> >> missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group) >> >> >> but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >> >> >> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >> >> >> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >> >> >> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?


    No comment from me. I have a vague idea of what the MFT/3 is. A MDF table top with some size of mm holes drilled in it in a grid pattern. And you can use the newer Festool rails and track saw and maybe router on top of it. And expensive posts and
    other things fit into the mm holes. I never understood the appeal of it. Why not just use your table saw or miter saw to cut the wood? Or if using the track saw to cut the wood, just toss the wood onto a Styrofoam panel, lay the guide on top, and cut
    with the track saw.
    I wasn't much interested until the Festool travlin' road show. They
    were demonstrating some other tools, using the MFT. The setup is very
    fast and they (of course) were making it look really good. I went
    back Saturday to look closer without a bunch of Festool employees
    standing around me. I was disappointed but could still be talked into
    it by someone who uses one every day. There are just some things
    about the rail mechanism (the MFT's bottom line) that didn't sit well.
    It could have been so much more robust.
    Now, I will admit to creating my own MFT style table. I glued and screwed a set of 2x4s together to make a frame. Then have a piece of particleboard to sit on top. And some pipe sockets and pipes to make legs on the bottom. I can lay pieces of
    wood on top and straight line rip the edges with the track saw. Then feed the pieces into my table saw to rip to width. Its kind of an elevated Styrofoam panel so I don't have to crawl around on the floor.
    I have a table with a sheet of MDF on a solid-core door, with edge
    banding to hold the MDF from moving (it's just sitting there so can be
    replaced easily). It's great for "ripping" panels down to size but not
    so great at "cross-cutting".

    I plan on drilling dog holes in it but haven't decided on the US 3/4"
    or European (Festool) 20mm holes. Since the table is so thick (2",
    IIRC) passing the clamps from the bottom isn't going to work but
    surface clamps will, which is always a problem.

    Since I always work alone and really can't moose full sheets around
    like I once did (particularly now) so the table saw isn't very
    user-friendly. I'd like to use it just for ripping and small parts.
    The MFT is set up to make short work of "cross-cutting" panels. If
    it were a little better, it could put a miter saw out to pasture.

    Again, I have no direct experience with the MFT table. Just seen pictures of it and read lots of comments from devotees about how wonderous it is. But I can't figure out why its so wonderful. I already own a SCMS that crosscuts 12 inches. I guess I
    could put in stop blocks on one side and flip the piece over so it would then crosscut 24 inches. Maybe that would work OK. SCMS cost $500 lets say. I also own a table saw. Its old now. Delta Contractors saw. I can crosscut and rip with it pretty darn
    good. Now, I agree working with full plywood sheets is cumbersome. Best to use the track saw and a Styrofoam panel first to cut the plywood down to size. Or to straight line rip an edge on long boards. I probably have at least $1000 over the decades
    invested into the table saw. Track saw and rails are of course expensive too. But you have to have a track saw and rails to make the MFT work. So you have to buy a track saw no matter what. MFT by itself is $775. Comes with a
    42" rail. It can cut 42" by 27". So you still need to buy a new longer rail to even crosscut a 4' x 8' sheet of plywood on the floor before you can even put it on the MFT. And a long rail to rip the plywood on its 8 foot side. And in addition to the $
    775 base cost, you still "need" to buy all the extra doo-dads for several hundreds of extra dollars. So the MFT table is over $1000 before its in its wonderous state.
    You can buy a second and cut 8' pieces. ;-)
    As I said, I already own a SCMS. Probably don't need that, but I already bought it. So not going to get rid of it. And I have a table saw that does everything the MFT does. For less money. And I own a track saw and rails. Which you have to buy to use
    the MFT, so that is a wash. What would a MFT do that I cannot already do now? And I can probably do everything better now too. And faster.
    There are certain situations where neither the table saw or the track
    saw seem to be the right tool. The piece is big enough that I really
    don't want to use the table saw and setting the track up is a PITA for
    one cut. I've been thinking about getting a short track and just do
    that. I have enough track to build a railroad but nothing shorter
    than 55". I could cut one down on a track saw. ;-) I just might.
    Now, I can understand the appeal of the MFT in certain situations. You are a traveling carpenter living in your van. And all of your cutting is done with the MFT. And you pull it out of the van and set it up on the grass to do all your work. Might
    make sense in that situation. Or maybe you are moving into the retirement home and you only have a 10' by 10' room as your shop. So you have to sell all your other tools first before moving in. And now you need something tiny to use in your new tiny shop.
    And you can carry the lightweight Styrofoam panel out onto the retirement home's center lawn when you need to cut a piece of plywood down to size. Before it can even fit on the MFT table inside your tiny shop.
    No question they're great for installers. At 42#, hauling one around
    would be easy. I didn't like the wobbly legs, either but this would
    be an acceptable tradeoff for a mobile workstation. One of the
    attendees at the Festool show said that he put a shelf across the
    bottom rungs and it's fine. That defeats its purpose as a mobile saw
    but solves the wobblies, apparently. They have a router MFT table too.
    I *really* didn't like how wobbly it was. I know everything is
    referenced to the top and movement doesn't matter to the cut but I
    want to work on a solid bench.

    Leon has and MFT for his shop and loves it. I was hoping he was still
    around to answer questions.


    I am probably the wrong person to comment in this thread. Since I do not own an MFT and have never used it. Kind of like you. But I look at it and think, I already own tools that can do what the MFT does, but easier than the MFT. So why would I want
    an MFT? Unless there is a real reason, such as the space aspect or portability aspect. If a woodworker already owns all the tools, then the MFT does not seem like a good replacement. If you are just starting out and have nothing, then maybe the MFT is
    a good starter that means you never need anything else. Maybe. But I don't think you are talking about that type of situation.

    As for shorter rails, I own an 800mm (31"). Not the holey one. Regular rail. I use it a little. But its not much more convenient than the 1400. And if you are cutting short things that fit the 800 rail, then they are about short enough to cut with
    the table saw or SCMS.

    I often get into a situation where I have a long piece (8' for
    argument's sake) that may be 2' wide that I want to cut cross-wise. A
    55" track is a pain because, while the bench I use will easily handle
    it, the space around it gets cramped. It's too long to cut on the
    table saw easily and the 55" rail gets to be a pain. Your 31" rail
    might be a good alternative. That's pretty much what I'd use the MFT
    for.

    The MFT is also really good at cutting sheets at an angle. I have to
    admit, though, that I think I've only needed to do it once. I think it
    would replace a SMCS, though like most here, I already have one
    (three, actually).

    I like my Festool track saw. Its great. And great at many different cuts. But its bad at some cuts too. And the MFT seems to try to improve on the bad cuts. It probably helps. But there are other tools that are the very best for the bad track saw
    cuts. So why not just get the better other tool. Why try to improve on the track saw and get it just to mediocre. When you can get great with a different tool.

    Do you have an example of these cuts and tools?

    This is a really good discussion. It's exactly what I was looking for.
    I'm really on the fence (NPI).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to k...@notreal.com on Wed Nov 9 19:52:02 2022
    On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 7:59:38 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 12:53:51 -0800 (PST), "russell...@yahoo.com" <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 1:21:54 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:22:26 -0800 (PST), "russell...@yahoo.com"
    <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 6:34:06 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote: >> >> On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 00:46:36 -0700 (PDT), "russell...@yahoo.com"
    <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 7:56:06 PM UTC-5, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >> >> >> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be >> >> >> used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >> >> >> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the >> >> >> rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every >> >> >> year.".

    Leon?


    No comment from me. I have a vague idea of what the MFT/3 is. A MDF table top with some size of mm holes drilled in it in a grid pattern. And you can use the newer Festool rails and track saw and maybe router on top of it. And expensive posts
    and other things fit into the mm holes. I never understood the appeal of it. Why not just use your table saw or miter saw to cut the wood? Or if using the track saw to cut the wood, just toss the wood onto a Styrofoam panel, lay the guide on top, and cut
    with the track saw.
    I wasn't much interested until the Festool travlin' road show. They
    were demonstrating some other tools, using the MFT. The setup is very >> >> fast and they (of course) were making it look really good. I went
    back Saturday to look closer without a bunch of Festool employees
    standing around me. I was disappointed but could still be talked into >> >> it by someone who uses one every day. There are just some things
    about the rail mechanism (the MFT's bottom line) that didn't sit well. >> >> It could have been so much more robust.
    Now, I will admit to creating my own MFT style table. I glued and screwed a set of 2x4s together to make a frame. Then have a piece of particleboard to sit on top. And some pipe sockets and pipes to make legs on the bottom. I can lay pieces of
    wood on top and straight line rip the edges with the track saw. Then feed the pieces into my table saw to rip to width. Its kind of an elevated Styrofoam panel so I don't have to crawl around on the floor.
    I have a table with a sheet of MDF on a solid-core door, with edge
    banding to hold the MDF from moving (it's just sitting there so can be >> >> replaced easily). It's great for "ripping" panels down to size but not >> >> so great at "cross-cutting".

    I plan on drilling dog holes in it but haven't decided on the US 3/4" >> >> or European (Festool) 20mm holes. Since the table is so thick (2",
    IIRC) passing the clamps from the bottom isn't going to work but
    surface clamps will, which is always a problem.

    Since I always work alone and really can't moose full sheets around
    like I once did (particularly now) so the table saw isn't very
    user-friendly. I'd like to use it just for ripping and small parts.
    The MFT is set up to make short work of "cross-cutting" panels. If
    it were a little better, it could put a miter saw out to pasture.

    Again, I have no direct experience with the MFT table. Just seen pictures of it and read lots of comments from devotees about how wonderous it is. But I can't figure out why its so wonderful. I already own a SCMS that crosscuts 12 inches. I guess I
    could put in stop blocks on one side and flip the piece over so it would then crosscut 24 inches. Maybe that would work OK. SCMS cost $500 lets say. I also own a table saw. Its old now. Delta Contractors saw. I can crosscut and rip with it pretty darn
    good. Now, I agree working with full plywood sheets is cumbersome. Best to use the track saw and a Styrofoam panel first to cut the plywood down to size. Or to straight line rip an edge on long boards. I probably have at least $1000 over the decades
    invested into the table saw. Track saw and rails are of course expensive too. But you have to have a track saw and rails to make the MFT work. So you have to buy a track saw no matter what. MFT by itself is $775. Comes with a
    42" rail. It can cut 42" by 27". So you still need to buy a new longer rail to even crosscut a 4' x 8' sheet of plywood on the floor before you can even put it on the MFT. And a long rail to rip the plywood on its 8 foot side. And in addition to
    the $775 base cost, you still "need" to buy all the extra doo-dads for several hundreds of extra dollars. So the MFT table is over $1000 before its in its wonderous state.
    You can buy a second and cut 8' pieces. ;-)
    As I said, I already own a SCMS. Probably don't need that, but I already bought it. So not going to get rid of it. And I have a table saw that does everything the MFT does. For less money. And I own a track saw and rails. Which you have to buy to
    use the MFT, so that is a wash. What would a MFT do that I cannot already do now? And I can probably do everything better now too. And faster.
    There are certain situations where neither the table saw or the track
    saw seem to be the right tool. The piece is big enough that I really
    don't want to use the table saw and setting the track up is a PITA for
    one cut. I've been thinking about getting a short track and just do
    that. I have enough track to build a railroad but nothing shorter
    than 55". I could cut one down on a track saw. ;-) I just might.
    Now, I can understand the appeal of the MFT in certain situations. You are a traveling carpenter living in your van. And all of your cutting is done with the MFT. And you pull it out of the van and set it up on the grass to do all your work. Might
    make sense in that situation. Or maybe you are moving into the retirement home and you only have a 10' by 10' room as your shop. So you have to sell all your other tools first before moving in. And now you need something tiny to use in your new tiny shop.
    And you can carry the lightweight Styrofoam panel out onto the retirement home's center lawn when you need to cut a piece of plywood down to size. Before it can even fit on the MFT table inside your tiny shop.
    No question they're great for installers. At 42#, hauling one around
    would be easy. I didn't like the wobbly legs, either but this would
    be an acceptable tradeoff for a mobile workstation. One of the
    attendees at the Festool show said that he put a shelf across the
    bottom rungs and it's fine. That defeats its purpose as a mobile saw
    but solves the wobblies, apparently. They have a router MFT table too.
    I *really* didn't like how wobbly it was. I know everything is
    referenced to the top and movement doesn't matter to the cut but I
    want to work on a solid bench.

    Leon has and MFT for his shop and loves it. I was hoping he was still
    around to answer questions.


    I am probably the wrong person to comment in this thread. Since I do not own an MFT and have never used it. Kind of like you. But I look at it and think, I already own tools that can do what the MFT does, but easier than the MFT. So why would I want
    an MFT? Unless there is a real reason, such as the space aspect or portability aspect. If a woodworker already owns all the tools, then the MFT does not seem like a good replacement. If you are just starting out and have nothing, then maybe the MFT is a
    good starter that means you never need anything else. Maybe. But I don't think you are talking about that type of situation.

    As for shorter rails, I own an 800mm (31"). Not the holey one. Regular rail. I use it a little. But its not much more convenient than the 1400. And if you are cutting short things that fit the 800 rail, then they are about short enough to cut with the
    table saw or SCMS.
    I often get into a situation where I have a long piece (8' for
    argument's sake) that may be 2' wide that I want to cut cross-wise. A
    55" track is a pain because, while the bench I use will easily handle
    it, the space around it gets cramped. It's too long to cut on the
    table saw easily and the 55" rail gets to be a pain. Your 31" rail
    might be a good alternative. That's pretty much what I'd use the MFT
    for.

    The MFT is also really good at cutting sheets at an angle. I have to
    admit, though, that I think I've only needed to do it once. I think it
    would replace a SMCS, though like most here, I already have one
    (three, actually).
    I like my Festool track saw. Its great. And great at many different cuts. But its bad at some cuts too. And the MFT seems to try to improve on the bad cuts. It probably helps. But there are other tools that are the very best for the bad track saw cuts.
    So why not just get the better other tool. Why try to improve on the track saw and get it just to mediocre. When you can get great with a different tool.
    Do you have an example of these cuts and tools?

    For the bad at certain cuts, the track saw is not great at ripping to exact widths, or cutting small pieces. I know there are parallel guides to make the ripping to exact widths repeatable. And I suspect they work. Many different companies sell guides
    that fit onto twin slot guide rails to allow you to get repeatable width cuts. The MFT might also have something like this built in. As for cutting small parts, track saws just aren't really designed for that. If I had a 3" wide short board and wanted
    to rip it down to 2.5", and its only 18" long, a track saw would not be my choice. Such as the rails and stiles on face frames. But a table saw would do this easy. Or you are making bottoms out of plywood for drawers. You cut them all to 12" width.
    But turns out they need to be 11" and 15/16" width. It would take you a minute or two to rip them to final width on a table saw with a rip fence. But a half hour using a MFT. And if you had all your rails and stiles in rough lengths. Say 13" instead
    of the final 12", a miter saw would take care of everything in 30 seconds. Or spend a half hour monkeying on a MFT. Or trying to cross cut small or short pieces with a track saw is also not easy.

    But, but, but, if you are sizing plywood sides for kitchen cabinets, top and bottom, then maybe the MFT would be a good choice. Kitchen cabinets are about 24" by 36". Roughly. Maybe more like 22" by 34". MFT once you spend 10 minutes setting
    everything up, it would handle cutting all the sides of plywood or MDF to official size. Table saw could do this too. And would be my choice. But maybe a 2' by 3' is more than you want to put through your table saw. I have a 52" wide Biesemeyer fence
    on mine and 4 feet of out table length. So easy for me. But maybe you only have 2 feet of fence travel and no out feed table. MFT might be your better choice. Just slower setting it up.

    Also just to add this in. I think the MFT is advertised as being good at making 90 degree cuts. Setup your fence and stop blocks right and then you can just stuff pieces in and cut to 90 degrees using the track saw and rail. But if you are only doing
    one or two, then maybe you could buy one of those attachments that fit onto guide rails that act like a square. If you only making 2 cuts instead of 20 cuts, then a square attachment might be better than setting up the MFT. Maybe. Or use a miter sled
    on your table saw. Or a SCMS if under 12".

    Most tools have a set of tasks its good at. But not good at other tasks. I'm not a fan of adapting a tool to do everything. That usually ends up being mediocre at best. But I understand sometimes due to cost or necessity you do have to do that.


    This is a really good discussion. It's exactly what I was looking for.
    I'm really on the fence (NPI).

    Again, I am not an expert on the MFT. Ha Ha. Have hardly ever seen them. But they just don't seem ideal for many situations. You can make the same cuts easier with other tools. Likely tools you already own. But for something like making a 37 degree
    angle cut on bookshelf sides, then it might be the tool of choice. But how many of those do you do in a lifetime? Not saying the MFT is not useful or even ideal in the right situation. But its probably a very small situations.

    Track saw great. I like mine. For cutting big sheets of plywood down to smaller pieces, its great. But once you get to the smaller pieces of plywood, then why not use a table saw. Once you get down to 3 foot by 3 foot, I can easily maneuver and carry
    those size pieces around. They are not 4 foot by 8 foot heavy plywood full sheets. MFT seems designed to work with plywood and wood that is less than 3x3 foot. Table saw and SCMS do great with those sizes too. Why not use them since you already own
    them? Track saw also great for straight line ripping one edge of long boards. But once you get a straight edge on one side, then why not use a table saw for ripping down to 4" wide. Repeat and repeat until the board is used up. I would not use the
    track saw to cut all the boards down to 4" wide. Just the first straight line rip. Then go to the table saw.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Fri Nov 11 10:47:52 2022
    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well
    enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to Leon on Fri Nov 11 10:52:29 2022
    On 11/11/2022 10:47 AM, Leon wrote:
    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3.  I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe.  The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on.  Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail.  Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play.  How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges?  It's worse than just a hinge.  The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail.  Moving the
    rail flexes these arms.  It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges.   It works well enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable.  BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down.  So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail.  It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT.  The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time.   Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that.   The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items.   Great table for the Shaper Workstation.



    And I have cut countless, well many thousands of, mortises with my
    Domino on that table using its dogs and clamping elements. Fast and easy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 11 15:27:52 2022
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well >enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved
    for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get
    set?

    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.


    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When
    not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but
    it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ritzannaseaton@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Leon on Fri Nov 11 23:36:23 2022
    On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:52:37 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 10:47 AM, Leon wrote:
    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.
    And I have cut countless, well many thousands of, mortises with my
    Domino on that table using its dogs and clamping elements. Fast and easy.

    Seems to me you are saying the MFT/3 is a good work table. And you use its associated dogs, clamps, and holes in the table top to hold and clamp lots of things. Great. But what about its main purpose(?) of using the track saw and rails on top to cut
    things?

    I looked on Google and the official MFT/3 perforated top is sold for $172. And Amazon has copies for less. Couldn't you easily make a base out of 2x4s and achieve your usage of the MFT/3? Or get fancy and make a folding base of sorts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to russellseaton1@yahoo.com on Sat Nov 12 08:23:45 2022
    On 11/12/2022 1:36 AM, russellseaton1@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:52:37 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 10:47 AM, Leon wrote:
    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well
    enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.
    And I have cut countless, well many thousands of, mortises with my
    Domino on that table using its dogs and clamping elements. Fast and easy.

    Seems to me you are saying the MFT/3 is a good work table. And you use its associated dogs, clamps, and holes in the table top to hold and clamp lots of things. Great. But what about its main purpose(?) of using the track saw and rails on top to cut
    things?

    I looked on Google and the official MFT/3 perforated top is sold for $172. And Amazon has copies for less. Couldn't you easily make a base out of 2x4s and achieve your usage of the MFT/3? Or get fancy and make a folding base of sorts.
    On 11/12/2022 1:36 AM, russellseaton1@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:52:37 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 10:47 AM, Leon wrote:
    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well
    enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.
    And I have cut countless, well many thousands of, mortises with my
    Domino on that table using its dogs and clamping elements. Fast and
    easy.

    Seems to me you are saying the MFT/3 is a good work table. And you
    use its associated dogs, clamps, and holes in the table top to hold and
    clamp lots of things. Great. But what about its main purpose(?) of
    using the track saw and rails on top to cut things?
    The MFT/3 main purpose is to be a work table. Multi Function Table.
    The track saw track accessory is a $100.00 option. Just the work table
    can be bought for $675.00 vs $775.00 that includes the 42" track
    accessory, mounting hardware and protractor. It is less expensive to
    buy the MFT/3 with the track saw rail option than to buy the basic MFT/3
    and seperately only the 42" track. The track accessory is not its main purpose. The MFT/3 can also be had as a Conturo Table set for $845.00.





    I looked on Google and the official MFT/3 perforated top is sold for
    $172. And Amazon has copies for less. Couldn't you easily make a base
    out of 2x4s and achieve your usage of the MFT/3? Or get fancy and make
    a folding base of sorts.
    Prices depend on whether you are buying after market tops or genuine
    Festool tops. I see the Festool top on Amazon for $172.

    Yes you can build a base and mount that top to it.

    But a comparable base would have foldable and adjustable legs, side
    rails for using clamps to hold work vertically, and folds to about 8"
    thick and stores on its edge/side.

    No doubt there are countless options if you do not want the track saw or conturo options for the MFT/3 and no one argues that Festool is not
    expensive. Bora makes a foldable top for their Cenepede set up that is
    $42 and about the same size as the MDT/3 table top.


    I will restate that I have the stack saw set up for my MFT/3. I opted
    for that addition to get the 42" track for less than buying the track
    out right by itself. I cannot remember the last time I set the MFT/3
    up to use with the track to cut stock. But I use the 42" rail by
    itself all of the time. The track saw set up is not a quick set up.
    You pretty much have to remove the track and, protractor, and mounting
    brackets if you want to put the MFT/3 away with its legs folded.

    The question is do you want something that is Festool comparable and
    uses all of the Festool accessories or something fashioned like the
    MFT/3 and kinda has similar functions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 12 09:36:40 2022
    On 11/12/2022 9:19 AM, L


    11/12/2022 9:19 AM, Leon wrote:


    Ok, It has been so long since I used the track with the MFT/3 that I
    forgot that the protractor is a separate piece. I was somehow thinking
    that the protractor mounted to the track. The track angle is fixed,
    the indexing rest and the hinge snug up against a fixed indexing stop,
    both sides, tucked inside the MFT/3 side rail slot. You do not remove
    those stops. So that is repeatable when setting back up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Sat Nov 12 09:19:19 2022
    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well
    enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved
    for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get
    set?

    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.


    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When
    not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but
    it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.
    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well
    enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved
    for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get
    set?
    I think most any type of hinge would have a lot of play if you are
    holding the other end of the 42" track. I don't think anything is
    going to be fool proof in this type set up.
    The indexing support indexes against a stop that is placed and fixed
    inside the MFT/3 side rail slot. You make that adjustment for that
    piece. It is for resetting up the track to make 90 degree cuts if you
    break the set up down after use. As for angles, I have never cut
    angles on mine, the indexing pin on the support would be at an angle to
    the slot in the track and I can see how there could be play. BUT even
    Incra miter gauges and long extension fences have play. Keep in mind
    that 1/4" play at the end of 42" may only equate to being 1/3 of a
    degree. I know that 1/4" play seems pretty sloppy but you may not be
    able to measure the degree result from one extreme to the next. If you
    are looking for dead on accuracy consider just using the track aligned
    with marks on the work, less the protractor, hinge, mounting hardware.
    For the time and effort to break down the track saw set up I simply
    don't use it in that capacity. But as I mentioned on another response
    I do use the 42" track by it self quite often. And the track saw
    option to the MFT/3 is less than buying the 42" rack alone.

    If you need to do "a lot" of "angle" cutting of panels this may be a
    good choice. I do not cut a lot of angles and my miter saw and or my
    TS and or simply measuring and aligning the TS track to pencil marks is
    good enough for me, and I can be pretty anal.




    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.


    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When
    not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but
    it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.
    I use the ratcheting Festool clamps through the bench holes and located
    at the back and side of the Workstation. The ratcheting handle is on
    the top side of the bench and does not get in the way back there in that location.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to ritzannaseaton@gmail.com on Sat Nov 12 13:12:15 2022
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 23:36:23 -0800 (PST), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:52:37 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 10:47 AM, Leon wrote:
    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well
    enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.
    And I have cut countless, well many thousands of, mortises with my
    Domino on that table using its dogs and clamping elements. Fast and easy.

    Seems to me you are saying the MFT/3 is a good work table. And you use its associated dogs, clamps, and holes in the table top to hold and clamp lots of things. Great. But what about its main purpose(?) of using the track saw and rails on top to cut
    things?

    I looked on Google and the official MFT/3 perforated top is sold for $172. And Amazon has copies for less. Couldn't you easily make a base out of 2x4s and achieve your usage of the MFT/3? Or get fancy and make a folding base of sorts.

    If all you want is an MDF table with dog holes in it, buy a sheet of
    MDF and a Woodpeckers hole boring jig. The jig and MDF will cost
    about the same but you can make the table as large as you want. You
    can make replacements for that at just the cost of another piece of
    MDF.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 12 14:30:28 2022
    On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:19:19 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be >>>> missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group) >>>> but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well
    enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved
    for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get
    set?

    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.


    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When
    not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but
    it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.
    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be >>> missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group) >>> but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the
    pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is
    two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well
    enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all
    of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at
    all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole
    set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved
    for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get
    set?
    I think most any type of hinge would have a lot of play if you are
    holding the other end of the 42" track. I don't think anything is
    going to be fool proof in this type set up.

    If it were cast, it would have a lot less. You can see the sheet
    metal bending when you put even very little side pressure on the
    track. In the 90-degree position the opposite side index reduces the
    play a lot. It wouldn't take much to make it better.

    The indexing support indexes against a stop that is placed and fixed
    inside the MFT/3 side rail slot. You make that adjustment for that
    piece. It is for resetting up the track to make 90 degree cuts if you
    break the set up down after use. As for angles, I have never cut
    angles on mine, the indexing pin on the support would be at an angle to
    the slot in the track and I can see how there could be play. BUT even
    Incra miter gauges and long extension fences have play. Keep in mind
    that 1/4" play at the end of 42" may only equate to being 1/3 of a
    degree.

    The miter gauge and fence looks like a pretty expensive part to never
    use. ;-0 Frankly, I've never used my track saw for angles either.

    I know that 1/4" play seems pretty sloppy but you may not be
    able to measure the degree result from one extreme to the next.

    I get 1/8 of a degree - point taken (if I didn't blow the arithmetic
    1/2-degree per inch). With the indexing pin, it's more like 1/16", so completely irrelevant. Hard to believe that I didn't screw up the
    arithmetic. 30 * 2pi inches in the circumference, divided by 360
    equals 1/2 inch per degree. 1/4" = 1/8 degree. Seems a square is
    superfluous. ;-)

    If you
    are looking for dead on accuracy consider just using the track aligned
    with marks on the work, less the protractor, hinge, mounting hardware.
    For the time and effort to break down the track saw set up I simply
    don't use it in that capacity. But as I mentioned on another response
    I do use the 42" track by it self quite often. And the track saw
    option to the MFT/3 is less than buying the 42" rack alone.

    The option implies the table, though. The function is then $775.

    If you need to do "a lot" of "angle" cutting of panels this may be a
    good choice. I do not cut a lot of angles and my miter saw and or my
    TS and or simply measuring and aligning the TS track to pencil marks is
    good enough for me, and I can be pretty anal.

    THe angle unit comes with the track for that $100.



    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.


    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do
    not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When
    not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but
    it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.
    I use the ratcheting Festool clamps through the bench holes and located
    at the back and side of the Workstation. The ratcheting handle is on
    the top side of the bench and does not get in the way back there in that >location.

    It depends on what you're doing no? I've been in many situations
    where it would be nice if the clamp were only 1/2" off the table or
    so. Cases where I'm using a router, for instance, and don't want to
    get the router tied up in the clamp. I could see this, in spades, with
    the Origin.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to ritzannaseaton@gmail.com on Sat Nov 12 15:57:04 2022
    On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 19:52:02 -0800 (PST), "russellseaton1@yahoo.com" <ritzannaseaton@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 7:59:38 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 12:53:51 -0800 (PST), "russell...@yahoo.com"
    <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 1:21:54 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote: >> >> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:22:26 -0800 (PST), "russell...@yahoo.com"
    <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 6:34:06 PM UTC-6, k...@notreal.com wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 00:46:36 -0700 (PDT), "russell...@yahoo.com"
    <ritzann...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 7:56:06 PM UTC-5, k...@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is
    just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >> >> >> >> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on
    the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be >> >> >> >> used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >> >> >> >> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the >> >> >> >> rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has
    never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every >> >> >> >> year.".

    Leon?


    No comment from me. I have a vague idea of what the MFT/3 is. A MDF table top with some size of mm holes drilled in it in a grid pattern. And you can use the newer Festool rails and track saw and maybe router on top of it. And expensive posts
    and other things fit into the mm holes. I never understood the appeal of it. Why not just use your table saw or miter saw to cut the wood? Or if using the track saw to cut the wood, just toss the wood onto a Styrofoam panel, lay the guide on top, and cut
    with the track saw.
    I wasn't much interested until the Festool travlin' road show. They
    were demonstrating some other tools, using the MFT. The setup is very >> >> >> fast and they (of course) were making it look really good. I went
    back Saturday to look closer without a bunch of Festool employees
    standing around me. I was disappointed but could still be talked into >> >> >> it by someone who uses one every day. There are just some things
    about the rail mechanism (the MFT's bottom line) that didn't sit well. >> >> >> It could have been so much more robust.
    Now, I will admit to creating my own MFT style table. I glued and screwed a set of 2x4s together to make a frame. Then have a piece of particleboard to sit on top. And some pipe sockets and pipes to make legs on the bottom. I can lay pieces of
    wood on top and straight line rip the edges with the track saw. Then feed the pieces into my table saw to rip to width. Its kind of an elevated Styrofoam panel so I don't have to crawl around on the floor.
    I have a table with a sheet of MDF on a solid-core door, with edge
    banding to hold the MDF from moving (it's just sitting there so can be >> >> >> replaced easily). It's great for "ripping" panels down to size but not >> >> >> so great at "cross-cutting".

    I plan on drilling dog holes in it but haven't decided on the US 3/4" >> >> >> or European (Festool) 20mm holes. Since the table is so thick (2",
    IIRC) passing the clamps from the bottom isn't going to work but
    surface clamps will, which is always a problem.

    Since I always work alone and really can't moose full sheets around
    like I once did (particularly now) so the table saw isn't very
    user-friendly. I'd like to use it just for ripping and small parts.
    The MFT is set up to make short work of "cross-cutting" panels. If
    it were a little better, it could put a miter saw out to pasture.

    Again, I have no direct experience with the MFT table. Just seen pictures of it and read lots of comments from devotees about how wonderous it is. But I can't figure out why its so wonderful. I already own a SCMS that crosscuts 12 inches. I guess
    I could put in stop blocks on one side and flip the piece over so it would then crosscut 24 inches. Maybe that would work OK. SCMS cost $500 lets say. I also own a table saw. Its old now. Delta Contractors saw. I can crosscut and rip with it pretty darn
    good. Now, I agree working with full plywood sheets is cumbersome. Best to use the track saw and a Styrofoam panel first to cut the plywood down to size. Or to straight line rip an edge on long boards. I probably have at least $1000 over the decades
    invested into the table saw. Track saw and rails are of course expensive too. But you have to have a track saw and rails to make the MFT work. So you have to buy a track saw no matter what. MFT by itself is $775. Comes with a
    42" rail. It can cut 42" by 27". So you still need to buy a new longer rail to even crosscut a 4' x 8' sheet of plywood on the floor before you can even put it on the MFT. And a long rail to rip the plywood on its 8 foot side. And in addition to
    the $775 base cost, you still "need" to buy all the extra doo-dads for several hundreds of extra dollars. So the MFT table is over $1000 before its in its wonderous state.
    You can buy a second and cut 8' pieces. ;-)
    As I said, I already own a SCMS. Probably don't need that, but I already bought it. So not going to get rid of it. And I have a table saw that does everything the MFT does. For less money. And I own a track saw and rails. Which you have to buy to
    use the MFT, so that is a wash. What would a MFT do that I cannot already do now? And I can probably do everything better now too. And faster.
    There are certain situations where neither the table saw or the track
    saw seem to be the right tool. The piece is big enough that I really
    don't want to use the table saw and setting the track up is a PITA for
    one cut. I've been thinking about getting a short track and just do
    that. I have enough track to build a railroad but nothing shorter
    than 55". I could cut one down on a track saw. ;-) I just might.
    Now, I can understand the appeal of the MFT in certain situations. You are a traveling carpenter living in your van. And all of your cutting is done with the MFT. And you pull it out of the van and set it up on the grass to do all your work. Might
    make sense in that situation. Or maybe you are moving into the retirement home and you only have a 10' by 10' room as your shop. So you have to sell all your other tools first before moving in. And now you need something tiny to use in your new tiny shop.
    And you can carry the lightweight Styrofoam panel out onto the retirement home's center lawn when you need to cut a piece of plywood down to size. Before it can even fit on the MFT table inside your tiny shop.
    No question they're great for installers. At 42#, hauling one around
    would be easy. I didn't like the wobbly legs, either but this would
    be an acceptable tradeoff for a mobile workstation. One of the
    attendees at the Festool show said that he put a shelf across the
    bottom rungs and it's fine. That defeats its purpose as a mobile saw
    but solves the wobblies, apparently. They have a router MFT table too.
    I *really* didn't like how wobbly it was. I know everything is
    referenced to the top and movement doesn't matter to the cut but I
    want to work on a solid bench.

    Leon has and MFT for his shop and loves it. I was hoping he was still
    around to answer questions.


    I am probably the wrong person to comment in this thread. Since I do not own an MFT and have never used it. Kind of like you. But I look at it and think, I already own tools that can do what the MFT does, but easier than the MFT. So why would I want
    an MFT? Unless there is a real reason, such as the space aspect or portability aspect. If a woodworker already owns all the tools, then the MFT does not seem like a good replacement. If you are just starting out and have nothing, then maybe the MFT is a
    good starter that means you never need anything else. Maybe. But I don't think you are talking about that type of situation.

    As for shorter rails, I own an 800mm (31"). Not the holey one. Regular rail. I use it a little. But its not much more convenient than the 1400. And if you are cutting short things that fit the 800 rail, then they are about short enough to cut with
    the table saw or SCMS.
    I often get into a situation where I have a long piece (8' for
    argument's sake) that may be 2' wide that I want to cut cross-wise. A
    55" track is a pain because, while the bench I use will easily handle
    it, the space around it gets cramped. It's too long to cut on the
    table saw easily and the 55" rail gets to be a pain. Your 31" rail
    might be a good alternative. That's pretty much what I'd use the MFT
    for.

    The MFT is also really good at cutting sheets at an angle. I have to
    admit, though, that I think I've only needed to do it once. I think it
    would replace a SMCS, though like most here, I already have one
    (three, actually).
    I like my Festool track saw. Its great. And great at many different cuts. But its bad at some cuts too. And the MFT seems to try to improve on the bad cuts. It probably helps. But there are other tools that are the very best for the bad track saw
    cuts. So why not just get the better other tool. Why try to improve on the track saw and get it just to mediocre. When you can get great with a different tool.
    Do you have an example of these cuts and tools?

    For the bad at certain cuts, the track saw is not great at ripping to exact widths, or cutting small pieces. I know there are parallel guides to make the ripping to exact widths repeatable. And I suspect they work. Many different companies sell
    guides that fit onto twin slot guide rails to allow you to get repeatable width cuts. The MFT might also have something like this built in. As for cutting small parts, track saws just aren't really designed for that. If I had a 3" wide short board and
    wanted to rip it down to 2.5", and its only 18" long, a track saw would not be my choice. Such as the rails and stiles on face frames. But a table saw would do this easy. Or you are making bottoms out of plywood for drawers. You cut them all to 12"
    width. But turns out they need to be 11" and 15/16" width. It would take you a minute or two to rip them to final width on a table saw with a rip fence. But a half hour using a MFT. And if you had all your rails and stiles in rough
    lengths. Say 13" instead of the final 12", a miter saw would take care of everything in 30 seconds. Or spend a half hour monkeying on a MFT. Or trying to cross cut small or short pieces with a track saw is also not easy.

    The parallel guides work exceedingly well. They beat the crap out of
    a table saw to cut up 4x8 panels lengthwise. I had to cut up 8"
    (7-7/8") slats out of a 4x8 sheet to mount fluorescent fixtures. It
    made quick work of two sheets.

    But, but, but, if you are sizing plywood sides for kitchen cabinets, top and bottom, then maybe the MFT would be a good choice. Kitchen cabinets are about 24" by 36". Roughly. Maybe more like 22" by 34". MFT once you spend 10 minutes setting
    everything up, it would handle cutting all the sides of plywood or MDF to official size. Table saw could do this too. And would be my choice. But maybe a 2' by 3' is more than you want to put through your table saw. I have a 52" wide Biesemeyer fence
    on mine and 4 feet of out table length. So easy for me. But maybe you only have 2 feet of fence travel and no out feed table. MFT might be your better choice. Just slower setting it up.

    If I have small pieces that I want to make smaller, a table saw is
    easy. Table saws excel at ripping wood. They're not so great with
    sheetgoods.

    Also just to add this in. I think the MFT is advertised as being good at making 90 degree cuts. Setup your fence and stop blocks right and then you can just stuff pieces in and cut to 90 degrees using the track saw and rail. But if you are only doing
    one or two, then maybe you could buy one of those attachments that fit onto guide rails that act like a square. If you only making 2 cuts instead of 20 cuts, then a square attachment might be better than setting up the MFT. Maybe. Or use a miter sled
    on your table saw. Or a SCMS if under 12".

    FOr 90-degree cuts with a track saw, I just use a large (26"
    Woodpeckers) square against the track and clamp with either the
    ratchet style clamps or if the clamps get in the way, the end
    compression type (don't know what they're called). The 90-degree
    attachments, or even the protractor type aren't worth the money, IMO.
    A square isn't any more difficult. The problem with cutting smaller
    pieces is the rail length. My shortest rail is 55", which gets in the
    way after the sheet is first broken down.

    The MFT would be good for crosscuts and panels wider than a SMCS. For
    me, that's a high percentage.

    Most tools have a set of tasks its good at. But not good at other tasks. I'm not a fan of adapting a tool to do everything. That usually ends up being mediocre at best. But I understand sometimes due to cost or necessity you do have to do that.

    That's the beauty of the MFT. It's really good at intermediate cuts.

    This is a really good discussion. It's exactly what I was looking for.
    I'm really on the fence (NPI).

    Again, I am not an expert on the MFT. Ha Ha. Have hardly ever seen them. But they just don't seem ideal for many situations. You can make the same cuts easier with other tools. Likely tools you already own. But for something like making a 37
    degree angle cut on bookshelf sides, then it might be the tool of choice. But how many of those do you do in a lifetime? Not saying the MFT is not useful or even ideal in the right situation. But its probably a very small situations.

    Universal tools? Not by a long shot but I often get into a situation
    where the track saw isn't right and the table saw gets cumbersome,

    Track saw great. I like mine. For cutting big sheets of plywood down to smaller pieces, its great. But once you get to the smaller pieces of plywood, then why not use a table saw. Once you get down to 3 foot by 3 foot, I can easily maneuver and
    carry those size pieces around. They are not 4 foot by 8 foot heavy plywood full sheets. MFT seems designed to work with plywood and wood that is less than 3x3 foot. Table saw and SCMS do great with those sizes too. Why not use them since you already
    own them? Track saw also great for straight line ripping one edge of long boards. But once you get a straight edge on one side, then why not use a table saw for ripping down to 4" wide. Repeat and repeat until the board is used up. I would not use
    the track saw to cut all the boards down to 4" wide. Just the first straight line rip. Then go to the table saw.

    I wouldn't use a track saw to rip boards. It's underpowered for most
    wood. Great for sheet goods, not so great on hardwood. That's the
    territory of 3HP table saws.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Mon Nov 14 12:07:04 2022
    On 11/12/2022 2:57 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:


    I wouldn't use a track saw to rip boards. It's underpowered for most
    wood. Great for sheet goods, not so great on hardwood. That's the
    territory of 3HP table saws.


    Not an issue with a TS 75. And remember the growling you hear when
    cutting is the motor constantly adjusting to maintain a constant speed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Mon Nov 14 13:22:11 2022
    On 11/12/2022 1:30 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:

    On 11/12/2022 1:30 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:19:19 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I
    must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's
    group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >>>>> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >>>>> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >>>>> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >>>>> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >>>>> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well >>>> enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all >>>> of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at >>>> all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It
    used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole >>>> set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved
    for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get
    set?

    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.


    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do >>>> not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and
    dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When
    not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but
    it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.
    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I
    must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's
    group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >>>>> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >>>>> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >>>>> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be
    used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >>>>> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the
    rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >>>>> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every
    year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well >>>> enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge
    that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all >>>> of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at >>>> all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It
    used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the
    MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole >>>> set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved
    for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get
    set?
    I think most any type of hinge would have a lot of play if you are
    holding the other end of the 42" track. I don't think anything is
    going to be fool proof in this type set up.

    If it were cast, it would have a lot less. You can see the sheet
    metal bending when you put even very little side pressure on the
    track. In the 90-degree position the opposite side index reduces the
    play a lot. It wouldn't take much to make it better.
    The cure is to NOT put pressure on the track when it is pivoted up and
    off of the indexing pin. I assure you that even cast will flex.



    The indexing support indexes against a stop that is placed and fixed
    inside the MFT/3 side rail slot. You make that adjustment for that
    piece. It is for resetting up the track to make 90 degree cuts if you
    break the set up down after use. As for angles, I have never cut
    angles on mine, the indexing pin on the support would be at an angle to
    the slot in the track and I can see how there could be play. BUT even
    Incra miter gauges and long extension fences have play. Keep in mind
    that 1/4" play at the end of 42" may only equate to being 1/3 of a
    degree.

    The miter gauge and fence looks like a pretty expensive part to never
    use. ;-0 Frankly, I've never used my track saw for angles either.
    But all of those parts and the 42" track are $20 less expensive than
    buying the 42" track alone by itself. I have cut angles with my track
    saw and quite accurately simply by marking the panel and aligning the
    track. The MFT/3 with the track/angle option would be better for
    repeated cuts and cuts narrow enough to fit.






    I know that 1/4" play seems pretty sloppy but you may not be
    able to measure the degree result from one extreme to the next.

    I get 1/8 of a degree - point taken (if I didn't blow the arithmetic 1/2-degree per inch). With the indexing pin, it's more like 1/16", so completely irrelevant. Hard to believe that I didn't screw up the
    arithmetic. 30 * 2pi inches in the circumference, divided by 360
    equals 1/2 inch per degree. 1/4" = 1/8 degree. Seems a square is superfluous. ;-)
    I simply drew it out on Sketchup. A 42" horizontal line and up 1/4" at
    one end of the line and back to the beginning of the horizontal line.
    Then measured the angle between the 2 lines.



    If you
    are looking for dead on accuracy consider just using the track aligned
    with marks on the work, less the protractor, hinge, mounting hardware.
    For the time and effort to break down the track saw set up I simply
    don't use it in that capacity. But as I mentioned on another response
    I do use the 42" track by it self quite often. And the track saw
    option to the MFT/3 is less than buying the 42" rack alone.

    The option implies the table, though. The function is then $775.
    Yes, the table alone is $675, add the 42"track/miter gauge option for
    $100 more, $775.

    Or the table alone for $675 and add just the 42" track, no miter gauge,
    for $120 more, $795.



    If you need to do "a lot" of "angle" cutting of panels this may be a
    good choice. I do not cut a lot of angles and my miter saw and or my
    TS and or simply measuring and aligning the TS track to pencil marks is
    good enough for me, and I can be pretty anal.

    THe angle unit comes with the track for that $100.
    Yes, $20 less expensive than buying the track by itself.






    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.

    The $200 was a type-o, should have been $100.



    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do >>>> not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and
    dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When
    not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but
    it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.
    I use the ratcheting Festool clamps through the bench holes and located
    at the back and side of the Workstation. The ratcheting handle is on
    the top side of the bench and does not get in the way back there in that
    location.

    It depends on what you're doing no? I've been in many situations
    where it would be nice if the clamp were only 1/2" off the table or
    so. Cases where I'm using a router, for instance, and don't want to
    get the router tied up in the clamp. I could see this, in spades, with
    the Origin.
    YES, I was just commenting on how I attach the Shaper workstation to the
    MFT/3. In this situation the Origin never gets close to the clamp handles.

    I typically never the hold down clamps unless they are required. I
    normally use the side clamping Festool Element clamps along with the dogs.
    When cutting a Domino mortise on the end of a board I place 2 dogs along
    one side of the board, then a clamping element on the opposite about
    halfway between the dogs. The end of the board hangs off of the MFT/3
    a few inches.

    The advantage to side clamping over clamping down is that the clamp
    maintains it's position and does not have to be readjusted with each
    board, assuming the boards are the same width. Still even width
    adjustments are quicker than closing the hold down clamp each time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 14 20:36:59 2022
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:07:04 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/12/2022 2:57 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:


    I wouldn't use a track saw to rip boards. It's underpowered for most
    wood. Great for sheet goods, not so great on hardwood. That's the
    territory of 3HP table saws.


    Not an issue with a TS 75. And remember the growling you hear when
    cutting is the motor constantly adjusting to maintain a constant speed.

    I have the original ('10 maybe?) TS55. No, it noticeably struggles on
    much more than 3/4" ply.

    We discussed this at the time. The TS75 came with the 75" track,
    which made it a somewhat better deal. I thought I'd only use it on
    ply, so didn't see the point of the larger, heavier saw. I was right.
    I've never been tempted to use it for anything else. It's not really
    a carpentry tool. ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 14 20:54:26 2022
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:22:11 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/12/2022 1:30 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:

    On 11/12/2022 1:30 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:19:19 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I
    must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's
    group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >>>>>> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >>>>>> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >>>>>> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be >>>>>> used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >>>>>> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the >>>>>> rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >>>>>> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every >>>>>> year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well >>>>> enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge >>>>> that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all >>>>> of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at >>>>> all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It
    used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the >>>>> MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole >>>>> set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved >>>> for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get >>>> set?

    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.


    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do >>>>> not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and
    dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When >>>> not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but >>>> it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.
    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I
    must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's
    group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >>>>>> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >>>>>> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >>>>>> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be >>>>>> used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >>>>>> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the >>>>>> rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >>>>>> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every >>>>>> year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well >>>>> enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge >>>>> that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all >>>>> of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at >>>>> all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It
    used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the >>>>> MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole >>>>> set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved >>>> for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get >>>> set?
    I think most any type of hinge would have a lot of play if you are
    holding the other end of the 42" track. I don't think anything is
    going to be fool proof in this type set up.

    If it were cast, it would have a lot less. You can see the sheet
    metal bending when you put even very little side pressure on the
    track. In the 90-degree position the opposite side index reduces the
    play a lot. It wouldn't take much to make it better.
    The cure is to NOT put pressure on the track when it is pivoted up and
    off of the indexing pin. I assure you that even cast will flex.

    It's not a matter of it flexing, rather there is no guarantee which
    side of the line it'll come down on. It can be off ~1/16" from cut to
    cut. That may not be much of an angle but it's not great for
    cabinets, or whatever.

    The indexing support indexes against a stop that is placed and fixed
    inside the MFT/3 side rail slot. You make that adjustment for that
    piece. It is for resetting up the track to make 90 degree cuts if you
    break the set up down after use. As for angles, I have never cut
    angles on mine, the indexing pin on the support would be at an angle to
    the slot in the track and I can see how there could be play. BUT even
    Incra miter gauges and long extension fences have play. Keep in mind
    that 1/4" play at the end of 42" may only equate to being 1/3 of a
    degree.

    The miter gauge and fence looks like a pretty expensive part to never
    use. ;-0 Frankly, I've never used my track saw for angles either.
    But all of those parts and the 42" track are $20 less expensive than
    buying the 42" track alone by itself. I have cut angles with my track
    saw and quite accurately simply by marking the panel and aligning the
    track. The MFT/3 with the track/angle option would be better for
    repeated cuts and cuts narrow enough to fit.

    If you buy the table, of course. It would be silly not to. I've even
    seen YouTubes where people bought two of the full sets instead of one
    of the basic and one full. There was an explanation for it but I
    didn't spent time watching. I may be wrong, but an 8' MFT doesn't
    thrill me much. I already have a table that works for lengthwise cuts.




    I know that 1/4" play seems pretty sloppy but you may not be
    able to measure the degree result from one extreme to the next.

    I get 1/8 of a degree - point taken (if I didn't blow the arithmetic
    1/2-degree per inch). With the indexing pin, it's more like 1/16", so
    completely irrelevant. Hard to believe that I didn't screw up the
    arithmetic. 30 * 2pi inches in the circumference, divided by 360
    equals 1/2 inch per degree. 1/4" = 1/8 degree. Seems a square is
    superfluous. ;-)
    I simply drew it out on Sketchup. A 42" horizontal line and up 1/4" at
    one end of the line and back to the beginning of the horizontal line.
    Then measured the angle between the 2 lines.

    That's cheating. I used 30" because that's the width of the table.


    If you
    are looking for dead on accuracy consider just using the track aligned
    with marks on the work, less the protractor, hinge, mounting hardware.
    For the time and effort to break down the track saw set up I simply
    don't use it in that capacity. But as I mentioned on another response
    I do use the 42" track by it self quite often. And the track saw
    option to the MFT/3 is less than buying the 42" rack alone.

    The option implies the table, though. The function is then $775.
    Yes, the table alone is $675, add the 42"track/miter gauge option for
    $100 more, $775.

    Or the table alone for $675 and add just the 42" track, no miter gauge,
    for $120 more, $795.

    Sure, there is no question it's the better deal. One without the
    other makes no sense to me. The track/hinge/angle unit are the whole
    purpose of the table. At least for me, the table alone isn't worth
    anything.


    If you need to do "a lot" of "angle" cutting of panels this may be a
    good choice. I do not cut a lot of angles and my miter saw and or my
    TS and or simply measuring and aligning the TS track to pencil marks is
    good enough for me, and I can be pretty anal.

    THe angle unit comes with the track for that $100.
    Yes, $20 less expensive than buying the track by itself.






    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.

    The $200 was a type-o, should have been $100.



    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do >>>>> not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and
    dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When >>>> not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but >>>> it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.
    I use the ratcheting Festool clamps through the bench holes and located
    at the back and side of the Workstation. The ratcheting handle is on
    the top side of the bench and does not get in the way back there in that >>> location.

    It depends on what you're doing no? I've been in many situations
    where it would be nice if the clamp were only 1/2" off the table or
    so. Cases where I'm using a router, for instance, and don't want to
    get the router tied up in the clamp. I could see this, in spades, with
    the Origin.
    YES, I was just commenting on how I attach the Shaper workstation to the >MFT/3. In this situation the Origin never gets close to the clamp handles.

    I'm surprised since the tape goes from edge to edge. I guess I can
    see it if all you do is clamped vertically. In any case, I buried the
    threaded inserts in my bench top. I had some question here about
    cutting slots in the knurled brass screws so I could get them out of
    the bench. It all worked better than I'd expected.

    I put a set on each side of the bench so I can pull it away from the
    wall and face the TV to watch the demos as I follow along. The TV was
    intended to show my Sketchup models as I made cuts and pieced things
    together. It works for demos and training videos, too.

    I typically never the hold down clamps unless they are required. I
    normally use the side clamping Festool Element clamps along with the dogs. >When cutting a Domino mortise on the end of a board I place 2 dogs along
    one side of the board, then a clamping element on the opposite about
    halfway between the dogs. The end of the board hangs off of the MFT/3
    a few inches.

    I intend to do that. I'd been debating whether to use 3/4" or 20mm
    holes in my bench. I'm leaning strongly towards 20mm now.

    The advantage to side clamping over clamping down is that the clamp
    maintains it's position and does not have to be readjusted with each
    board, assuming the boards are the same width. Still even width
    adjustments are quicker than closing the hold down clamp each time.

    It also doesn't get in the way of a router base. I've run into that
    more than once.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krw@notreal.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 15 21:56:20 2022
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:22:11 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/12/2022 1:30 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:

    On 11/12/2022 1:30 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:19:19 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I
    must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's
    group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >>>>>> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >>>>>> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >>>>>> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be >>>>>> used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >>>>>> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the >>>>>> rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >>>>>> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every >>>>>> year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well >>>>> enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge >>>>> that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all >>>>> of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at >>>>> all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It
    used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the >>>>> MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole >>>>> set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved >>>> for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get >>>> set?

    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it.


    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do >>>>> not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and
    dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When >>>> not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads
    stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but >>>> it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can
    use the Festool mounting parts.
    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I
    must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's
    group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >>>>>> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >>>>>> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >>>>>> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be >>>>>> used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >>>>>> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the >>>>>> rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >>>>>> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every >>>>>> year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well >>>>> enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge >>>>> that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all >>>>> of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at >>>>> all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It
    used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the >>>>> MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole >>>>> set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index
    tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved >>>> for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get >>>> set?
    I think most any type of hinge would have a lot of play if you are
    holding the other end of the 42" track. I don't think anything is
    going to be fool proof in this type set up.

    If it were cast, it would have a lot less. You can see the sheet
    metal bending when you put even very little side pressure on the
    track. In the 90-degree position the opposite side index reduces the
    play a lot. It wouldn't take much to make it better.
    The cure is to NOT put pressure on the track when it is pivoted up and
    off of the indexing pin. I assure you that even cast will flex.

    I did some playing tonight, thinking about this some more. Miter
    gauges have some slop in them but, at least the one I was playing with
    is steel (Incra 1000HD). OTOH, my TS fence doesn't flex at all. I
    would have thought the track would be similar but there isn't pressure
    on it that there is a TS fence.

    The other question I answered for myself was the position of the track
    indexing support. I just realized that there is no reason to move
    this, or the track. In fact, I remember the Festool rep saying that
    many people route a slot and embed a strip of HDPE. When it gets too
    cut up, just replace the strip. It's obvious that the rail would have
    to be fixed for this to work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon@21:1/5 to krw@notreal.com on Wed Nov 16 10:34:46 2022
    On 11/15/2022 8:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:22:11 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/12/2022 1:30 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:

    On 11/12/2022 1:30 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:19:19 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I
    must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's
    group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >>>>>>> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >>>>>>> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >>>>>>> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be >>>>>>> used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >>>>>>> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the >>>>>>> rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >>>>>>> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every >>>>>>> year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well >>>>>> enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge >>>>>> that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all >>>>>> of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at >>>>>> all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It
    used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the >>>>>> MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole >>>>>> set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index >>>>> tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved >>>>> for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get >>>>> set?

    The rail miter gauge and everything is now a $200 option but it's
    still well worth it. I don't see the table being useful without it. >>>>>

    As for the MFT table, I use it all the time. Yet it wobbles but I do >>>>>> not notice that. The clamping elements and hold down clamps, and
    dogs
    are constant use items. Great table for the Shaper Workstation.

    Hadn't though of that but I put some 1/4-20 threaded inserts in my
    workbench and use knurled brass screws to mount the workstation. When >>>>> not in use the screws are recessed into the bench top so the threads >>>>> stay clean. The bench is too thick to fish clamps from the bottom but >>>>> it works otherwise. I plan on drilling 20mm holes in the top so I can >>>>> use the Festool mounting parts.
    On 11/11/2022 2:27 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:47:52 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
    wrote:

    On 11/5/2022 7:56 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
    I was at Highland today taking a serious look at the MFT/3. I
    must be
    missing something (so was the sales guy and the Festool Owner's
    group)
    but that think is about as accurate as a dull axe. The rail hinge is >>>>>>> just stamped steel, as is the pin it sits on. Before resting on the >>>>>>> pin there is about 1/4" play in the rail. Even after it's sitting on >>>>>>> the pin, there is about 1/16" play. How the hell can this thing be >>>>>>> used for woodworking. Framing, maybe.

    Stamped steel hinges? It's worse than just a hinge. The "hinge" is >>>>>>> two pins with about 1-1/2" steel arms to hold the rail. Moving the >>>>>>> rail flexes these arms. It's a terrible design.

    FOG members say something like "Yeah, it's a terrible design and has >>>>>>> never been addressed but at least they make it more expensive every >>>>>>> year.".

    Leon?

    I suppose you are talking about the guide rail hinges. It works well >>>>>> enough, you have an indexing spot on the opposite side from the hinge >>>>>> that keeps the rail square and or stable. BUT it is a RPIA to set all >>>>>> of that up every time I set up or take it down. So I seldom use it at >>>>>> all in that capacity but I have the extra short guide rail. It
    used to
    be that the rail and miter and accessories were a $100 add on to the >>>>>> MFT. The rail alone was worth more than that so I opted for the whole >>>>>> set up 8~10 years ago.

    The hinge has a lot of play but even with the rail down on the index >>>>> tang there is a 1/16" play in the rail. The index tang has to be moved >>>>> for a different miter setting but there is a 1/4" play in the rail
    without resting on the index. So, how does the opposite side index get >>>>> set?
    I think most any type of hinge would have a lot of play if you are
    holding the other end of the 42" track. I don't think anything is
    going to be fool proof in this type set up.

    If it were cast, it would have a lot less. You can see the sheet
    metal bending when you put even very little side pressure on the
    track. In the 90-degree position the opposite side index reduces the
    play a lot. It wouldn't take much to make it better.
    The cure is to NOT put pressure on the track when it is pivoted up and
    off of the indexing pin. I assure you that even cast will flex.

    I did some playing tonight, thinking about this some more. Miter
    gauges have some slop in them but, at least the one I was playing with
    is steel (Incra 1000HD). OTOH, my TS fence doesn't flex at all. I
    would have thought the track would be similar but there isn't pressure
    on it that there is a TS fence.

    The other question I answered for myself was the position of the track indexing support. I just realized that there is no reason to move
    this, or the track. In fact, I remember the Festool rep saying that
    many people route a slot and embed a strip of HDPE. When it gets too
    cut up, just replace the strip. It's obvious that the rail would have
    to be fixed for this to work.

    LOL. We do tend to over think things, don't we. ;~)
    If the fence was changing angles that would be one thing but it is
    simply adjusting up and down for the thickness of the stock and pivoting
    up and down to ease insertion and removal of the stock to be cut. And properly adjusted for the thickness of the stock. The track rubber
    bottom strips are plenty to keep it from flexing or shifting when
    cutting, but you do have the added hinge side and indexing side to help
    realign after lifting and lowering the track.

    I will warn you again however.....
    Unless I am working on a project my MFT/3 is folded up and sitting on
    its side. You have to remove the track and replace it. That is a bit
    if a PIA. BUT if you leave the MFT/3 up all of the time, this is not
    an issue.
    I have a Paulk style work bench with a foot print. set up, of about
    40"x96". It gets put away if I am not working on a job. And on small
    jobs I may not pull it our at all, although set up is about 2~3 minutes.
    That is where the MFT/3 comes in handy. It is smaller and set up,
    bring it out, unfold the legs, and put it on its feet takes about a
    minute. Plus it is a good size for the Shaper Workstation, mortising
    with the Domino, and sanding. I also use it along with dogs and clamps
    to hold drawers in place while I attach the drawer side of the slides.
    IMHO the MFT/3 is worth the price since it gets used with every job,
    even with out using the track saw on it.

    I do not do glues up on the MFT/3. I want the top to stay flat and
    smooth. Mine is about 11 years old and the top is still in great shape.
    IIRC if the top needs to be replaced you can simply flip top to bottom.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)