The Max is a goner. Even their own people are also passing off-comments of their fears of flying on that kind of "uncertainty" plane. People are
afraid of seeing themselves dropped out of the plane and into the sky to ground zero.
"Hiroko" wrote in message news:qvnff1$pc7$1@dont-email.me...
The Max is a goner. Even their own people are also passing off-comments of >> their fears of flying on that kind of "uncertainty" plane. People are
afraid of seeing themselves dropped out of the plane and into the sky to
ground zero.
"China’s first jet, the ARJ21, is a heap of junk; even its Western avionics >and engines are nearing their sell-by date. The C919 may be better, but
since China’s industry is staying in the hands of the state, its products >won’t challenge Airbus and Boeing in free markets anytime soon." >http://www.richardaboulafia.com/shownote.asp?id=559
Maybe they should have stuck with the 747 / 727 designs and just done gradual upgrades ?
"PhantomView" wrote in message >news:ubiv1fdd8410tn41i5ojueqv855snr52pl@4ax.com...
Maybe they should have stuck with the 747 / 727 designs and just done
gradual upgrades ?
They should've moved all the Maxes out to the Mojave Desert before they
could deteriorate...
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:50:04 -0600, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
"PhantomView" wrote in message >news:ubiv1fdd8410tn41i5ojueqv855snr52pl@4ax.com...
Maybe they should have stuck with the 747 / 727 designs and just
done gradual upgrades ?
They should've moved all the Maxes out to the Mojave Desert before
they could deteriorate...
They have to be good for parts. The engines especially can
be recycled immediately, put into some other companies
new jets. The wheel s ought to be worth something. The
rest, well, there is alway a market for recycled aluminum.
I seem to remember seeing the body of some big old plane
being converted into a roadside diner. "BurgerMAX" would be
a great name. Open a chain of them .......
They should've moved all the Maxes out to the Mojave Desert before they >>could deteriorate...
They have to be good for parts. The engines especially can
be recycled immediately, put into some other companies
new jets. The wheel s ought to be worth something. The
rest, well, there is alway a market for recycled aluminum
How can you place a BIGGER MORE POWERFUL on an old design
airframe ?
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:35:45 -0500
PhantomView <pv@PhantomView114.net> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:50:04 -0600, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
"PhantomView" wrote in message
news:ubiv1fdd8410tn41i5ojueqv855snr52pl@4ax.com...
Maybe they should have stuck with the 747 / 727 designs and just
done gradual upgrades ?
They should've moved all the Maxes out to the Mojave Desert before
they could deteriorate...
They have to be good for parts. The engines especially can
be recycled immediately, put into some other companies
new jets. The wheel s ought to be worth something. The
rest, well, there is alway a market for recycled aluminum.
I seem to remember seeing the body of some big old plane
being converted into a roadside diner. "BurgerMAX" would be
a great name. Open a chain of them .......
The aircraft are okay.
Its just the software isn't fit for purpose.
And aircrews have forgotten how to actually fly the aeroplane trusting
the software
I think it goes beyond just the software. According to some
of the whistleblower employees there was a lot about the
design that was poorly thought-out. That could lead to
mechanical failures or even fires in the wiring later on.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 57:39:24 |
| Calls: | 6,652 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,200 |
| Messages: | 5,331,029 |
