https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cx-F45oOnM
Only in Canada: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1HZHEFVfT4
Another bullshit post with bullshit fake-news videos.
On 3/14/2020 3:53 PM, Byker wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cx-F45oOnM
Only in Canada: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1HZHEFVfT4
Another bullshit post with bullshit fake-news videos.
Putting up a post with nothing but video links is not appropriate. Only >lying racist KKK fat fucks do that.
Yup, it's too bad when lazy and rude fucks attempt to morph Usenet, a text forum, into some sort of video chat room.
While a video link isn't completely unacceptable the author of the post should include enough text to describe the gist of the video so those who might be interested can at least make an intelligent choice whether to use the link or not.
As for me, I rarely click on video links.
I come here to read which is an activity that nourished the brain while videos are know to make Johnny a dull lad.
Another bullshit post with bullshit fake-news videos.
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
""Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."" wrote in messagenews:lppq6fd320emgnmhpptr349717lmgobj8t@4ax.com...
Yup, it's too bad when lazy and rude fucks attempt to morph Usenet, a text >> forum, into some sort of video chat room.
What was that about a picture being worth a thousand words?
While a video link isn't completely unacceptable the author of the post
should include enough text to describe the gist of the video so those who
might be interested can at least make an intelligent choice whether to use >> the link or not.
Well, click on it and find out.
As for me, I rarely click on video links.
Admit it, you can't resist them.
I come here to read which is an activity that nourished the brain while
videos are know to make Johnny a dull lad.
The same people who refrain from clicking on YT links are the same ones who >piss and moan about TinyUrl links, rather than copying-and-pasting long, >broken URLs back together...
""Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."" wrote in message >news:lppq6fd320emgnmhpptr349717lmgobj8t@4ax.com...
Yup, it's too bad when lazy and rude fucks attempt to morph Usenet, a text >> forum, into some sort of video chat room.
What was that about a picture being worth a thousand words?
While a video link isn't completely unacceptable the author of the post
should include enough text to describe the gist of the video so those who
might be interested can at least make an intelligent choice whether to use >> the link or not.
Well, click on it and find out.
MIGHT lead direct to some kiddie porn site, which
about a dozen agencies and entities camp around
collecting IP addresses ..............
Well, click on it and find out.
MIGHT lead direct to some kiddie porn site, which
about a dozen agencies and entities camp around
collecting IP addresses ..............
"PhantomView"Â wrote in message news:s14r6ftf7u774qi0auju80tgtvjt64rr5r@4ax.com...
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:54:32 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
Well, click on it and find out.
 MIGHT lead direct to some kiddie porn site, which
 about a dozen agencies and entities camp around
 collecting IP addresses ..............
Ever hear of
Ever hear of the fact that *all* of the groups to which you posted are text-only groups, and that links to undocumented, bullshit videos are *always* inappropriate?
I'm surprised YT hasn't shut this one down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vjPBrBU-TM
Ever hear of the fact that *all* of the groups to which you posted are
text-only groups, and that links to undocumented, bullshit videos are
*always* inappropriate?
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
I would post binaries but Earthlink
On 3/14/2020 3:53 PM, Byker wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cx-F45oOnM
Only in Canada: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1HZHEFVfT4
Another bullshit post with bullshit fake-news videos.
Putting up a post with nothing but video links is not appropriate. Only
lying racist KKK fat fucks do that.
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:54:32 -0500, "Byker"<byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
""Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."" wrote in messagenews:lppq6fd320emgnmhpptr349717lmgobj8t@4ax.com...
Yup, it's too bad when lazy and rude fucks attempt to morph Usenet, a text
forum, into some sort of video chat room.
What was that about a picture being worth a thousand words?
While a video link isn't completely unacceptable the author of the post should include enough text to describe the gist of the video so those who might be interested can at least make an intelligent choice whether to use
the link or not.
Well, click on it and find out.
No!
As for me, I rarely click on video links.
Admit it, you can't resist them.
I resist them easily.
I come here to read which is an activity that nourished the brain while videos are know to make Johnny a dull lad.
The same people who refrain from clicking on YT links are the same ones who piss and moan about TinyUrl links, rather than copying-and-pasting long, broken URLs back together...
Oh, that's another thing that pisses me off... wrapped and borked hyperlinks.
There is no reason to post wrapped links other than stupidity and/or laziness. I NEVER post long links that wrap and bork because I'm not
some dumbass Usenet n00b!
My long links remain all on a single long line.
I do this as a courtesy to my large and appreciate reading audience
so that their Usenet experience is enhanced and pleasant.
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:54:32 -0500, "Byker"<byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
""Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."" wrote in message news:lppq6fd320emgnmhpptr349717lmgobj8t@4ax.com...
Yup, it's too bad when lazy and rude fucks attempt to morph Usenet, a text
forum, into some sort of video chat room.
What was that about a picture being worth a thousand words?
While a video link isn't completely unacceptable the author of the post should include enough text to describe the gist of the video so those who might be interested can at least make an intelligent choice whether to use
the link or not.
Well, click on it and find out.
MIGHT lead direct to some kiddie porn site, which
about a dozen agencies and entities camp around
collecting IP addresses ..............
Byker wrote:
----snip----
I'm surprised YT hasn't shut this one down:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vjPBrBU-TM
Why would they? She might be skinny, but it's not kiddy porn: just
another example of the lengths people who can't do music will go to
in their pursuit of a grammy.
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020, PhantomView <pv@PhantomView114.net> wrote:
MIGHT lead direct to some kiddie porn site, which
about a dozen agencies and entities camp around
collecting IP addresses ..............
Never thought of that. Thanks. Can't trust anybody
these days.
On 3/14/20 10:52 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020, PhantomView <pv@PhantomView114.net> wrote:Unless you're a Democrats Pedophile then it's OK!
MIGHT lead direct to some kiddie porn site, which
about a dozen agencies and entities camp around
collecting IP addresses ..............
Never thought of that. Thanks. Can't trust anybody
these days.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 19:39:47 |
| Calls: | 6,646 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,190 |
| Messages: | 5,327,322 |