"Futbolmetrix" escreveu:
What's the conventional wisdom, pick players from strong teams that are
likely to win in 4 games, or somewhat more balanced matchups that would
require 7 games?
For skaters, you want players who'll get a lot of points (duh), so longer >series might give you a better chance. Though, as MH says, low scoring games >will kill you no matter what.
Since I always go Penguins-heavy (for partisan reasons), I try to spread my >bets over the lines. I.e., it's risky to pick all three players on Crosby's >line, since if that line gets shut down in a game (or series), I'll be hurt.
It doesn't hurt, however, to pick power play regulars. While referees
swallow their whistles during the playoffs, and power plays become even >rarer, it's still a good thing your players might be involved in better >scoring situations. Plus, such players are usually point getters 5-on-5 as >well.
One thing I've done in the past (when I have the time and don't feel lazy)
is to try and find undervalued players. You may not have enough points to >pick a McDavid, but it might pay off to pick a cheaper player who's a
regular on his line.
For goalies, you want one who will win four games in the round.
Abraço,
Luiz Mello
---
Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antivírus. >https://www.avast.com/antivirus
In article <ocma8f$qvt$1@dont-email.me>,
Clément <lcmello.listas@terra.com.br> wrote:
"Futbolmetrix" escreveu:
What's the conventional wisdom, pick players from strong teams that are
likely to win in 4 games, or somewhat more balanced matchups that would
require 7 games?
For skaters, you want players who'll get a lot of points (duh), so longer
series might give you a better chance. Though, as MH says, low scoring games >> will kill you no matter what.
Since I always go Penguins-heavy (for partisan reasons), I try to spread my >> bets over the lines. I.e., it's risky to pick all three players on Crosby's >> line, since if that line gets shut down in a game (or series), I'll be hurt. >>
It doesn't hurt, however, to pick power play regulars. While referees
swallow their whistles during the playoffs, and power plays become even
rarer, it's still a good thing your players might be involved in better
scoring situations. Plus, such players are usually point getters 5-on-5 as >> well.
One thing I've done in the past (when I have the time and don't feel lazy) >> is to try and find undervalued players. You may not have enough points to
pick a McDavid, but it might pay off to pick a cheaper player who's a
regular on his line.
For goalies, you want one who will win four games in the round.
Abraço,
Luiz Mello
---
Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antivírus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Get ready to see Edmonton smoke San Jose out!
On 2017-04-12 5:29 PM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <ocma8f$qvt$1@dont-email.me>,
Clément <lcmello.listas@terra.com.br> wrote:
"Futbolmetrix" escreveu:
What's the conventional wisdom, pick players from strong teams that are >>>> likely to win in 4 games, or somewhat more balanced matchups that would >>>> require 7 games?
For skaters, you want players who'll get a lot of points (duh), so longer >>> series might give you a better chance. Though, as MH says, low scoring games
will kill you no matter what.
Since I always go Penguins-heavy (for partisan reasons), I try to spread my >>> bets over the lines. I.e., it's risky to pick all three players on Crosby's >>> line, since if that line gets shut down in a game (or series), I'll be hurt.
It doesn't hurt, however, to pick power play regulars. While referees
swallow their whistles during the playoffs, and power plays become even
rarer, it's still a good thing your players might be involved in better
scoring situations. Plus, such players are usually point getters 5-on-5 as >>> well.
One thing I've done in the past (when I have the time and don't feel lazy) >>> is to try and find undervalued players. You may not have enough points to >>> pick a McDavid, but it might pay off to pick a cheaper player who's a
regular on his line.
For goalies, you want one who will win four games in the round.
Abraço,
Luiz Mello
---
Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antivírus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Get ready to see Edmonton smoke San Jose out!
Cross-posting binky lives in Calgary, Edmonton tossed his moronic ass
out last year to preserve the local gene pool.
In message <ocmgdn$ai1$1@dont-email.me>, Idlehands
<hidefromu@nospamhush.com> writes
On 2017-04-12 5:29 PM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <ocma8f$qvt$1@dont-email.me>,
Clément <lcmello.listas@terra.com.br> wrote:
"Futbolmetrix" escreveu:
What's the conventional wisdom, pick players from strong teams that are >>>>> likely to win in 4 games, or somewhat more balanced matchups that would >>>>> require 7 games?
For skaters, you want players who'll get a lot of points (duh), so longer >>>> series might give you a better chance. Though, as MH says, low scoring games
will kill you no matter what.
Since I always go Penguins-heavy (for partisan reasons), I try to spread my
bets over the lines. I.e., it's risky to pick all three players on Crosby's
line, since if that line gets shut down in a game (or series), I'll be hurt.
It doesn't hurt, however, to pick power play regulars. While referees
swallow their whistles during the playoffs, and power plays become even >>>> rarer, it's still a good thing your players might be involved in better >>>> scoring situations. Plus, such players are usually point getters 5-on-5 as >>>> well.
One thing I've done in the past (when I have the time and don't feel lazy) >>>> is to try and find undervalued players. You may not have enough points to >>>> pick a McDavid, but it might pay off to pick a cheaper player who's a
regular on his line.
For goalies, you want one who will win four games in the round.
Abraço,
Luiz Mello
---
Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antivírus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Get ready to see Edmonton smoke San Jose out!
Cross-posting binky lives in Calgary, Edmonton tossed his moronic ass
out last year to preserve the local gene pool.
You forgot to mention that you were next.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 85:47:11 |
| Calls: | 6,658 |
| Files: | 12,203 |
| Messages: | 5,333,712 |