• Re: So Let Me Get This Straight, Conservatives are More Concerned With

    From Skeeter@21:1/5 to She hired him as the prosecutor you on Thu Feb 15 14:22:23 2024
    In article <bddb6bc5-3c9c-4f35-98f0-462d118d3622n@googlegroups.com>, davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...

    ...maybe having an inappropriate relationship with a guy that has/had NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the GA trial of Donald Trump, (the one that hasn't even really started yet!

    She hired him as the prosecutor you idiot. They both had said even
    before the trial that they didn't like Trump.

    But .....

    1) ...are OK with the fact that Trump tried to overturn the Georgia vote...

    2) ....don't worry at all about the fact that Trump was found responsible for sexual assault?

    Do I have that right, Skeet?

    But crimes on your side are ok? Like Joe taking documents when he wasn't supposed to?


    Jason

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Freezer@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 22:38:57 2024
    If I don't reply to this Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground
    post, the terroists win.

    ...maybe having an inappropriate relationship with a guy that
    has/had NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the GA trial of Donald Trump,
    (the one that hasn't even really started yet!

    But .....

    1) ...are OK with the fact that Trump tried to overturn the
    Georgia vote...

    2) ....don't worry at all about the fact that Trump was found
    responsible for sexual assault?

    Do I have that right, Skeet?


    Jason


    I have had people straight-faced argue with me that Trump's crimes
    are political, so they don't really count as "crimes."

    Seriously, that's what Cult 45 has been reduced to.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Freezer@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 22:43:25 2024
    If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.

    But crimes on your side are ok? Like Joe taking documents when
    he wasn't supposed to?

    Say Biden was indicted. What, exactly, do you think his punishment
    would have been? Should have been?

    Like Hillary Clinton before him, the juice wasn't worth the
    squeeze.

    And like HRC, the special investigator went out of their way to
    take an unprofessional swipe at their target out the door. A swipe
    intended to hurt them politically, nothing more.

    But you just keep equating that to Trump making an international
    menace of himself. Show us just how far down the MAGA hole you've
    truly fallen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 15:56:52 2024
    In article <XnsB119A95D95068freezer88hotmailcom@95.217.65.137>, freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...

    If I don't reply to this Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground
    post, the terroists win.

    ...maybe having an inappropriate relationship with a guy that
    has/had NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the GA trial of Donald Trump,
    (the one that hasn't even really started yet!

    But .....

    1) ...are OK with the fact that Trump tried to overturn the
    Georgia vote...

    2) ....don't worry at all about the fact that Trump was found
    responsible for sexual assault?

    Do I have that right, Skeet?


    Jason


    I have had people straight-faced argue with me that Trump's crimes
    are political, so they don't really count as "crimes."

    Seriously, that's what Cult 45 has been reduced to.

    I suppose fani is just political? What about Biden being deemed "elderly
    and has a bad memory" so he gets away with the same crime they are going
    after Trump for?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 15:58:11 2024
    In article <XnsB119AA1F08394freezer88hotmailcom@95.217.65.137>, freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...

    If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.

    But crimes on your side are ok? Like Joe taking documents when
    he wasn't supposed to?

    Say Biden was indicted. What, exactly, do you think his punishment
    would have been? Should have been?

    Like Hillary Clinton before him, the juice wasn't worth the
    squeeze.

    Did they say she was not able to withstand a trial?

    And like HRC, the special investigator went out of their way to
    take an unprofessional swipe at their target out the door. A swipe
    intended to hurt them politically, nothing more.


    He broke the law.

    But you just keep equating that to Trump making an international
    menace of himself. Show us just how far down the MAGA hole you've
    truly fallen.


    It show that the left ignores the law.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 18:48:25 2024
    In article <ca67a181-5d89-40a0-83d0-0d2aa7d3a5e7n@googlegroups.com>, davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...

    On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 5:57:00 PM UTC-5, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <XnsB119A95D95068f...@95.217.65.137>, free...@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...

    If I don't reply to this Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground
    post, the terroists win.

    ...maybe having an inappropriate relationship with a guy that
    has/had NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the GA trial of Donald Trump,
    (the one that hasn't even really started yet!

    But .....

    1) ...are OK with the fact that Trump tried to overturn the
    Georgia vote...

    2) ....don't worry at all about the fact that Trump was found responsible for sexual assault?

    Do I have that right, Skeet?


    Jason


    I have had people straight-faced argue with me that Trump's crimes
    are political, so they don't really count as "crimes."

    Seriously, that's what Cult 45 has been reduced to.
    I suppose fani is just political? What about Biden being deemed "elderly and has a bad memory" so he gets away with the same crime they are going after Trump for?

    *sigh* Look who has a brand new obsession.

    Jason

    :look who only focuses on Trump and not his own backyard.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 18:49:36 2024
    In article <e72b78ba-4d3e-4816-963f-9b4d7a672fd9n@googlegroups.com>, davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...

    On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 5:58:15 PM UTC-5, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <XnsB119AA1F08394f...@95.217.65.137>, free...@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...

    If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.

    But crimes on your side are ok? Like Joe taking documents when
    he wasn't supposed to?

    Say Biden was indicted. What, exactly, do you think his punishment
    would have been? Should have been?

    Like Hillary Clinton before him, the juice wasn't worth the
    squeeze.
    Did they say she was not able to withstand a trial?

    And like HRC, the special investigator went out of their way to
    take an unprofessional swipe at their target out the door. A swipe intended to hurt them politically, nothing more.
    He broke the law.

    But you just keep equating that to Trump making an international
    menace of himself. Show us just how far down the MAGA hole you've
    truly fallen.
    It show that the left ignores the law.

    Brah, you worship a president who was IMPEACHED TWICE.

    Failed impeachments.

    His administration has more convicted criminals in it than even REAGAN's or NIXON's!!!!

    HES INVOLVED IN MULTIPLE FUCKING TRIALS RIGHT NOW AND YOU'RE YELLING ABOUT "THE LEFT IGNORES THE LAW"?!?!?

    The left does ignore the law. Why wasn't Joe taken to trial?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)