https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it still on the
?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,? wrote Steven Engel,then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.
?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee, concluded in his54-page opinion.
Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was one of twoapproved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.
Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into Biden.investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in relation to its
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
Jason
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump’s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department’s 2020 opinion around Trump’s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House’s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally
declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion — issued by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel — came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote
for it. Not only is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday’s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
“[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in
that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,” wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration’s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.
“The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,” Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee, concluded in his 54-page opinion.
Engel’s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House’s inquiry
by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional
subpoenas. The charge was one of two approved by the House in December
2019, setting the stage for Trump’s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.
Trump’s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an
impeachment inquiry into Biden.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy’s announcement on Tuesday
that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected
to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice
Department, FBI and IRS in relation to its investigation of Biden’s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be
bound by the OLC opinion.
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow)
but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for
a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually
does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you
guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
Jason
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>,the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it still on
Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,? wrote Steven
his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee, concluded in
approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was one of two
investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into Biden.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in relation to its
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it still on
Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,? wrote Steven
his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee, concluded in
approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was one of two
its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into Biden.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in relation to
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>,on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it still
Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,? wrote Steven
in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee, concluded
two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was one of
its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into Biden.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in relation to
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it still
Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,? wrote
in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee, concluded
two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was one of
to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into Biden.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in relation
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>,still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it
Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,? wrote
concluded in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee,
of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was one
Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into Biden.
to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in relation
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the
last week.
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it
Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,? wrote
concluded in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee,
one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was
Biden.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into
relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!
In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it
wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,?
concluded in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee,
one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was
Biden.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into
relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!Everyone watches you do it.
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
Everyone watches you do it.
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Are you dreaming of Trump again?
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial >>>>>>>>> could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now. >>>>>>>>>
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s >>>>>>>>> new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally >>>>>>>>> declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid >>>>>>>>> unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal >>>>>>>>> Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s >>>>>>>>> decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without >>>>>>>>> initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it still on the >>>>>>>>> books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds >>>>>>>>> to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize >>>>>>>>> an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a
committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use >>>>>>>>> compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may >>>>>>>>> compel the production of documents or testimony,? wrote Steven >>>>>>>>> Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump
administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional
investigators.
?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the
impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and >>>>>>>>> the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a
Senate-confirmed Trump appointee, concluded in his 54-page opinion. >>>>>>>>>
Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment >>>>>>>>> Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the >>>>>>>>> House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to >>>>>>>>> defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was one of two approved >>>>>>>>> by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020
impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.
Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in >>>>>>>>> papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. >>>>>>>>> Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as
Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into Biden.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on >>>>>>>>> Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. >>>>>>>>> It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken >>>>>>>>> by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in relation to its
investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business >>>>>>>>> dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion. >>>>>>>>>
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to >>>>>>>>> follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was >>>>>>>>> going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her >>>>>>>>> purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and
McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking >>>>>>>>> idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up >>>>>>>>> being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from >>>>>>>>> you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from >>>>>>>>> falling into the shitter.
Jason
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a >>>>>>>> word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they
overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!! >>>>>> Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!
When's that evidence coming?
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is
wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,?
concluded in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee,
was one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge
Biden.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into
relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!Everyone watches you do it.
When's that evidence coming?
In article <4063d3aa-b47b-4b29...@googlegroups.com>,is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only
wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,?
concluded in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee,
was one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge
into Biden.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry
relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Impeachment Evidence.Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!Everyone watches you do it.
When's that evidence coming?What evidence?
you're crying about now.
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:25:39PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
In article <4063d3aa-b47b-4b29...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only
wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,?
appointee, concluded in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump
charge was one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The
into Biden.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry
in relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!Everyone watches you do it.
Impeachment Evidence.When's that evidence coming?What evidence?
You sidetrack so much I dont even know half the time what
you're crying about now.
You're the one who has been asking for impeachment ever since Biden took office!
In article <f008da3d-fefa-46f8...@googlegroups.com>,only is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:25:39 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <4063d3aa-b47b-4b29...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not
testimony,? wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or
appointee, concluded in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump
charge was one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The
inquiry into Biden.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment
in relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it. So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
BULLSHITEverything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!Everyone watches you do it.
It's taken you 7 years to go after Trump. You will get what is underImpeachment Evidence.When's that evidence coming?What evidence?
current investigation when it is released.
You sidetrack so much I dont even know half the time what
you're crying about now.
You're the one who has been asking for impeachment ever since Biden took office!No I haven't.
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 6:24:24 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
In article <f008da3d-fefa-46f8...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:25:39 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <4063d3aa-b47b-4b29...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it
Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.
?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,? wrote
concluded in his 54-page opinion.
?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee,
one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.
Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was
Biden.
Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into
relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in
BULLSHITIt's taken you 7 years to go after Trump. You will get what is underImpeachment Evidence.What evidence?Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the >>>>>>>> last week.Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.Are you dreaming of Trump again?
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
Jason
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy! >>>>>> Everyone watches you do it.
When's that evidence coming?
current investigation when it is released.
No I haven't.
You sidetrack so much I dont even know half the time what
you're crying about now.
You're the one who has been asking for impeachment ever since Biden took office!
But you have been screaming "LOCK HIM UP" for 7 years.
I should have started earlier!
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 6:24:24PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:only is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
In article <f008da3d-fefa-46f8...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:25:39 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <4063d3aa-b47b-4b29...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not
testimony,? wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or
appointee, concluded in his 54-page opinion.?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump
charge was one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The
inquiry into Biden.Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment
IRS in relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it.
So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
JasonAre you dreaming of Trump again?
Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!Is there a point here or are you just babbling again?
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just the
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!Everyone watches you do it.
It's taken you 7 years to go after Trump. You will get what is under current investigation when it is released.Impeachment Evidence.When's that evidence coming?What evidence?
You sidetrack so much I dont even know half the time what
you're crying about now.
BULLSHITYou're the one who has been asking for impeachment ever since Biden took office!No I haven't.
But you have been screaming "LOCK HIM UP" for 7 years.
I should have started earlier!
rec.sport.pro-wrestling wrote:still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 6:24:24PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f008da3d-fefa-46f8...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:25:39 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <4063d3aa-b47b-4b29...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is it
wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.
?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,?
concluded in his 54-page opinion.
?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee,
one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.
Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge was
Biden.
Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into
relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in
BULLSHITIt's taken you 7 years to go after Trump. You will get what is underImpeachment Evidence.What evidence?Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just theIs there a point here or are you just babbling again?Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.Are you dreaming of Trump again?
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
Jason
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy! >>>>>> Everyone watches you do it.
When's that evidence coming?
current investigation when it is released.
No I haven't.
You sidetrack so much I dont even know half the time what
you're crying about now.
You're the one who has been asking for impeachment ever since Biden took office!
But you have been screaming "LOCK HIM UP" for 7 years.
I should have started earlier!
you should get some new material one tracker
In article <DLucnUSerMxlVZT4...@giganews.com>, pursent100it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
@gmail.com says...
rec.sport.pro-wrestling wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 6:24:24 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f008da3d-fefa-46f8...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:25:39 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <4063d3aa-b47b-4b29...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only is
wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.
?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,?
concluded in his 54-page opinion.
?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee,
was one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.
Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge
Biden.
Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry into
relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in
BULLSHITIt's taken you 7 years to go after Trump. You will get what is underImpeachment Evidence.What evidence?Everyone watches you do it.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just theIs there a point here or are you just babbling again?Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process.Are you dreaming of Trump again?
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
Jason
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!
And Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!
When's that evidence coming?
current investigation when it is released.
No I haven't.
You sidetrack so much I dont even know half the time what
you're crying about now.
You're the one who has been asking for impeachment ever since Biden took office!
But you have been screaming "LOCK HIM UP" for 7 years.
I should have started earlier!
you should get some new material one trackeri know, he's still crying about Trump while others have moved along.
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 3:31:08PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
In article <DLucnUSerMxlVZT4...@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
rec.sport.pro-wrestling wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 6:24:24 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f008da3d-fefa-46f8...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:25:39 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <4063d3aa-b47b-4b29...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>> jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only
wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.
?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,?
concluded in his 54-page opinion.
?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump appointee,
was one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.
Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The charge
into Biden.
Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry
relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS in
BULLSHITIt's taken you 7 years to go after Trump. You will get what is under >> current investigation when it is released.Impeachment Evidence.What evidence?Everyone watches you do it.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just theAnd Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Is there a point here or are you just babbling again? >>>>>>>>>Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process. >>>>>>>>>>>Are you dreaming of Trump again?
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
Jason
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!
When's that evidence coming?
No I haven't.
You sidetrack so much I dont even know half the time what
you're crying about now.
You're the one who has been asking for impeachment ever since Biden took office!
But you have been screaming "LOCK HIM UP" for 7 years.
I should have started earlier!
you should get some new material one trackeri know, he's still crying about Trump while others have moved along.
Still refuse to acknowledge he's running for president, huh?
In article <42879d32-736f-47a8...@googlegroups.com>,is it still on the books, it is binding on the current administration as it responds to Tuesday?s announcement by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to authorize an impeachment inquiry into Biden, again without a vote.
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 3:31:08 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <DLucnUSerMxlVZT4...@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
rec.sport.pro-wrestling wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 6:24:24 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f008da3d-fefa-46f8...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:25:39 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <4063d3aa-b47b-4b29...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:26:43 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f5ad8adf-363c-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:36:59 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <104a71bc-d2a9-4eae...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 11:03:39 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c58a500e-b73e-4593...@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>> jebediah....@gmail.com says...
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <5fd718f7-7264-41dc...@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>>>> jebediah....@gmail.com says...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/12/trump-doj-assist-biden-impeachment-probe-00115393
How Donald Trump?s DOJ gave Biden a major assist in the coming impeachment probe
The department?s 2020 opinion around Trump?s impeachment trial could place some serious constraints on House Republicans now.
Joe Biden has a literal Trump card to play against the House?s new impeachment inquiry.
In January 2020, the Donald Trump-led Justice Department formally declared that impeachment inquiries by the House are invalid unless the chamber takes formal votes to authorize them.
That opinion ? issued by the Justice Department?s Office of Legal Counsel ? came in response to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?s decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into Trump without initially holding a vote for it. Not only
wrote Steven Engel, then the head of DOJ?s Office of Legal Counsel, backing the Trump administration?s rejection of subpoenas from the Democratic congressional investigators.
?[W]e conclude that the House must expressly authorize a committee to conduct an impeachment investigation and to use compulsory process in that investigation before the committee may compel the production of documents or testimony,?
appointee, concluded in his 54-page opinion.
?The House had not authorized such an investigation in connection with the impeachment-related subpoenas issued before October 31, 2019, and the subpoenas therefore had no compulsory effect,? Engel, a Senate-confirmed Trump
charge was one of two approved by the House in December 2019, setting the stage for Trump?s January 2020 impeachment trial. Trump was ultimately acquitted in a nearly party-line vote.
Engel?s opinion was aimed at defusing an article of impeachment Democrats had filed against Trump accusing him of obstructing the House?s inquiry by encouraging his administration officials to defy congressional subpoenas. The
into Biden.
Trump?s impeachment attorneys revealed the secret DOJ opinion in papers submitted as part of their trial defense in the Senate. Now, that opinion could carry significant ramifications as Republicans embark on an impeachment inquiry
in relation to its investigation of Biden?s son Hunter and his foreign business dealings. All three agencies would be bound by the OLC opinion.
That investigation was escalated by McCarthy?s announcement on Tuesday that an inquiry would be launched without a formal vote. It is expected to feature significant scrutiny of actions taken by the Justice Department, FBI and IRS
Yep, got yer Nikes on. You doing the 400-meter in Paris next summer?BULLSHITIt's taken you 7 years to go after Trump. You will get what is underImpeachment Evidence.What evidence?Everyone watches you do it.Says the guy who has ran from at least 5 of his own posts in just theAnd Skeeter opens the escape hatch again.Is there a point here or are you just babbling again? >>>>>>>>>Aw, it WAS too much for your pea brain to process. >>>>>>>>>>>Are you dreaming of Trump again?
****
You see, Skeets, (and I know this is going to be hard for you to follow) but McCarthy said 13 days ago to Brietbart that he was going to call for a vote on Impeachment Inquiries.
One problem: He didn't have the votes. And he knew it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> So FFW to yesterday where(because Marjorie has his balls in her purse) he just says "fuck it we're going to start an inquiry and see what happens"
And now the Republicans are mad, the Dems are laughing and McCarthy looks like a fucking idiot. Well...MORE of a fucking idiot than he usually does. And it's probably all gonna wind up being just for show anyway.
Such comedy from you guys. But could we expect anything else from you guys? Good thing, Dems are around to keep the country from falling into the shitter.
Jason
Everything is fair unless it involves your side. You didn't read a word of it did you?
Well never mind. Don't even think about it!
Biden's gonna be impeached!! This is just like the day they overturned abortion! This is gonna work out GREAT for you guys!!!!!
last week.
Keep lying! It seems to make at least one of your stooges very happy!
When's that evidence coming?
current investigation when it is released.
No I haven't.
You sidetrack so much I dont even know half the time what
you're crying about now.
You're the one who has been asking for impeachment ever since Biden took office!
But you have been screaming "LOCK HIM UP" for 7 years.
I should have started earlier!
you should get some new material one trackeri know, he's still crying about Trump while others have moved along.
Still refuse to acknowledge he's running for president, huh?What does that have to do with anything?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 107:10:31 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,482 |