x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
In article <oe4LM.83578$98Pa....@usenetxs.com>,
bill.s...@innocent.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.No matter, it's still a true story.
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux Snooze. Good catch.
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux Snooze. Good catch.
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux Snooze. Good catch.
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because,
Faux Snooze. Good catch.
i think i'd bone her
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:37 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because,
Faux Snooze. Good catch.
i think i'd bone her
I was wondering if you would or not, thank you for letting me know.
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:10:11 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <oe4LM.83578$98Pa....@usenetxs.com>,
bill.s...@innocent.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.No matter, it's still a true story.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT. The guy who turns down EVERYTHIGN from WaPo or the NYT -- and who is SPECIFICALLY asked if the story is a lie and runs from it --- is now pulling THIS shit?
HOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEE fucking shit!
Damn hypocrites.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!! LOL!!!!
And I'm even supposed to be taking the weekend off, but HOLY FUCKING SHEEEOT!!!
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux >>> Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of any
meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is it factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely are calling into question the facts of the article, simply because it's Fox. You just
stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi for
advocating for more policing. My bad.
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because,
Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of any
meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is it
factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that
aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely are
calling into question the facts of the article, simply because it's
Fox. You just stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi for
advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:16 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that.
Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of
any meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is
it factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that >>>>>> aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely are >>>>>> calling into question the facts of the article, simply because
it's Fox. You just stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi for >>>>>> advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
Maybe a bicker but I wouldn't say a fight.
well , bring it on ,
i don't like anyone from south of the tropic of cancer
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:40 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:16 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that.
Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of >>>>>>> any meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is >>>>>>> it factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that >>>>>>> aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely
are calling into question the facts of the article, simply
because it's Fox. You just stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi
for advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
Maybe a bicker but I wouldn't say a fight.
well , bring it on ,
i don't like anyone from south of the tropic of cancer
I don't either.
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that.
Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of any
meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is it
factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that
aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely are
calling into question the facts of the article, simply because it's
Fox. You just stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi for
advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, >>>>> Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of any
meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is it
factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that
aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely are
calling into question the facts of the article, simply because it's
Fox. You just stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi for
advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:16 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that.
Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of any >>>>> meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is it >>>>> factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that
aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely are
calling into question the facts of the article, simply because it's
Fox. You just stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi for
advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
Maybe a bicker but I wouldn't say a fight.
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:40 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:16 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that.
Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of >>>>>>>> any meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is >>>>>>>> it factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source
that aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You
absolutely are calling into question the facts of the article, >>>>>>>> simply because it's Fox. You just stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi >>>>>>>> for advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
Maybe a bicker but I wouldn't say a fight.
well , bring it on ,
i don't like anyone from south of the tropic of cancer
I don't either.
i know
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:51 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:40 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:16 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. >>>>>>>>>>> Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of >>>>>>>>> any meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where >>>>>>>>> is it factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source >>>>>>>>> that aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You
absolutely are calling into question the facts of the article, >>>>>>>>> simply because it's Fox. You just stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi >>>>>>>>> for advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
Maybe a bicker but I wouldn't say a fight.
well , bring it on ,
i don't like anyone from south of the tropic of cancer
I don't either.
i know
hi
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:51 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:40 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:16 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. >>>>>>>>>>>> Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void >>>>>>>>>> of any meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe >>>>>>>>>>> to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where >>>>>>>>>> is it factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source >>>>>>>>>> that aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You
absolutely are calling into question the facts of the article, >>>>>>>>>> simply because it's Fox. You just stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi >>>>>>>>>> for advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
Maybe a bicker but I wouldn't say a fight.
well , bring it on ,
i don't like anyone from south of the tropic of cancer
I don't either.
i know
hi
hello
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 6:23 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:51 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:40 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:16 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void >>>>>>>>>>>> of any meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe >>>>>>>>>>>>> to grind? Some sites are more believable than others. >>>>>>>>>>>>Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? >>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source >>>>>>>>>>>> that aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You >>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely are calling into question the facts of the
article, simply because it's Fox. You just stated that. >>>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA >>>>>>>>>>>> Nazi for advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
Maybe a bicker but I wouldn't say a fight.
well , bring it on ,
i don't like anyone from south of the tropic of cancer
I don't either.
i know
hi
hello
Just got back from a walk, got 2 poops out of Ike, success.
oh boy , he's ready to race now
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 6:23 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:51 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:40 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:16 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void >>>>>>>>>>> of any meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe >>>>>>>>>>>> to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where >>>>>>>>>>> is it factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source >>>>>>>>>>> that aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You >>>>>>>>>>> absolutely are calling into question the facts of the
article, simply because it's Fox. You just stated that. >>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA >>>>>>>>>>> Nazi for advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
Maybe a bicker but I wouldn't say a fight.
well , bring it on ,
i don't like anyone from south of the tropic of cancer
I don't either.
i know
hi
hello
Just got back from a walk, got 2 poops out of Ike, success.
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 7:55 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 6:23 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:51 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:40 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:16 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 4:02 PM, % wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because, Faux
Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is >>>>>>>>>>>>> void of any meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to grind? Some sites are more believable than others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news >>>>>>>>>>>>> source that aligns with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. >>>>>>>>>>>>> You absolutely are calling into question the facts of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> article, simply because it's Fox. You just stated that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nazi for advocating for more policing. My bad.
well stop being such a fk'in idjit
hey hey
ho ho
fk'in idjits
have got to go!
well you been looking for a fight all day , come on
Maybe a bicker but I wouldn't say a fight.
well , bring it on ,
i don't like anyone from south of the tropic of cancer
I don't either.
i know
hi
hello
Just got back from a walk, got 2 poops out of Ike, success.
oh boy , he's ready to race now
lol yeah he did the "lay a patch and growl" thing after the 2nd one, he
was ready to take on the world, jaja
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux >> Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of any meaning.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is it
factually incorrect?
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that aligns
with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely are calling into question the facts of the article, simply because it's Fox. You just
stated that.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi for
advocating for more policing. My bad.
In article <%V4LM.83582$98Pa.25086@usenetxs.com>,
bill.stickers@innocent.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
But it's still a true story.
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux >>>> Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of any meaning.
Because you quoted a story from Foxnews, duh.
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is it
factually incorrect?
You seem to have intentionally missed my point entirely.
I didn't say the article was untrue. My point is where
the story is coming from.
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that aligns
with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely are calling into
question the facts of the article, simply because it's Fox. You just
stated that.
Correct. Thing is, you rarely cite any other news source,
and Foxnews does, (surprise!), have an agenda. Would you
believe every story that was reported by RT (Russian
Today)? Some of the stories reported by that news service
are true. So which ones would you choose to believe
without question?
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi for
advocating for more policing. My bad.
And?
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/10/2023 2:35 AM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:52 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/9/2023 1:05 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dem-party-chairwoman-once-called-defund-police-carjacked-assaulted-minneapolis
Yebbut, foxnews.
Right, that event never happened and she never said that. Because, Faux >>>> Snooze. Good catch.
I didn't say it didn't happen.
So then why did you respond "yebbut"? Your response is void of any meaning.
Because you quoted a story from Foxnews, duh.
And?
Why don't you quote from a source that don't have an axe
to grind? Some sites are more believable than others.
Specifically what axe is being ground in that article? Where is it
factually incorrect?
You seem to have intentionally missed my point entirely.
I didn't say the article was untrue. My point is where
the story is coming from.
lol - so what? If you're saying the story isn't untrue, then what
difference does it make where it came from? Your "yebbut" has zero meaning.
What would be an unbiased news source. Citing a news source that aligns >> with your own bias isn't unbiased, btw. You absolutely are calling into >> question the facts of the article, simply because it's Fox. You just
stated that.
Correct. Thing is, you rarely cite any other news source,
and Foxnews does, (surprise!), have an agenda. Would you
believe every story that was reported by RT (Russian
Today)? Some of the stories reported by that news service
are true. So which ones would you choose to believe
without question?
Of course Fox is biased, duh. Show me one news source that isn't.
This wasn't an opinion piece, it was a news story about a factual event
that took place. That's it. You yourself just said you're not denying
it happened. So this entire discussion is pointless. All you're doing
is saying Fox is biased and you don't like them. That has nothing to
with the story I posted, which you agreed is factual.
https://www.facebook.com/shivanthi.sathanandan/posts/10161178673010477?ref=embed_post
Wait, that doesn't count either, because now she's a MAGA Nazi for
advocating for more policing. My bad.
And?
I'm just following your logic.
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/10/2023 12:14 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Logic?
If the only news you are going to consume comes from
Foxnews, then that's because you want to feed your
prejudices.
How do you know that's the only news source I consume? You're assuming
a lot.
If I could be arsed to scroll through your poasts would I
find links to other news sources?
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/10/2023 12:14 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Logic?
If the only news you are going to consume comes from
Foxnews, then that's because you want to feed your
prejudices.
How do you know that's the only news source I consume? You're assuming
a lot.
However, you are right that all news sources
are biased, but there are degrees of that. I shop around
for my news and tend to ignore the US ones because they
are bonkers.
Indeed they are.
BTW, bitchute has some videos you might like.
Don't know what bitchute is and I'm fine on procrastination tools, don't
need anymore at this point.
Logic?
If the only news you are going to consume comes from
Foxnews, then that's because you want to feed your
prejudices.
However, you are right that all news sources
are biased, but there are degrees of that. I shop around
for my news and tend to ignore the US ones because they
are bonkers.
BTW, bitchute has some videos you might like.
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/10/2023 12:47 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/10/2023 12:14 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Logic?
If the only news you are going to consume comes from Foxnews, then
that's because you want to feed your prejudices.
How do you know that's the only news source I consume? You're
assuming a lot.
If I could be arsed to scroll through your poasts would I find links to
other news sources?
Usually not, no. That doesn't mean I don't read other news sources.
On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 13:08:51 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/10/2023 12:47 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/10/2023 12:14 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Logic?
If the only news you are going to consume comes from Foxnews, then
that's because you want to feed your prejudices.
How do you know that's the only news source I consume? You're
assuming a lot.
If I could be arsed to scroll through your poasts would I find links to
other news sources?
Usually not, no. That doesn't mean I don't read other news sources.
You just need to keep them secret, it would seem.
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/14/2023 7:05 PM, Creon wrote:
On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 13:08:51 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/10/2023 12:47 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 9/10/2023 12:14 PM, William Stickers wrote:
Logic?
If the only news you are going to consume comes from Foxnews, then >>>>>> that's because you want to feed your prejudices.
How do you know that's the only news source I consume? You're
assuming a lot.
If I could be arsed to scroll through your poasts would I find links to >>>> other news sources?
Usually not, no. That doesn't mean I don't read other news sources.
You just need to keep them secret, it would seem.
Tucker Carlson
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 102:03:26 |
| Calls: | 6,660 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,982 |