https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pMsupport the Constitution as a state or federal official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.” Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect former Confederates to Congress
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken an oath to
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are committed to the
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-7, Jebediah Grainger wrote:support the Constitution as a state or federal official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.” Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect former Confederates to Congress
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken an oath to
co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are committed to
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried to get a hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders should be tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-7, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of
Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never
Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential
ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th
Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political
office if, having taken an oath to support the Constitution as a state
or federal official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.”
Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former
Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect former Confederates
to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation of war by other
means. But the century and a half after the Civil War, brought no
insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the
arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by
leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes
Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society co-founder Steven
Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him
ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands.
“[T]he case is not even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are
committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.”
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried to get a hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders should
be tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
Laz Mann wrote:
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-7, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office
if, having taken an oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal
official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.” Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might
(as indeed they did) elect former Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments
put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.”
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried to get a hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders should be tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
Did some research on this claim and it appears to be... true? This guy
seems to be the real deal as far as intelligent, predictive political
science and analysis goes.
https://www.facebook.com/100063535691611/videos/in-my-room-25-full-show-breaki
ng-down-validating-xiv3/775060330041602
In My Room #25 (Full Show): Breaking Down & Validating #XIV3
Under Amendment XIV Section 3 of the US Constitution there are 147 congresspeople currently seated who arguably should not be, to say
nothing of hundreds if not thousands of others. We'll talk about what "arguments" are involved here for and against, and why in the end they
all come down to these people aided, abetted, or participated in an insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution to which they swore
an oath, and there are therefore constitutionally disqualified from
office. All that, your comments, and much more! (Live broadcast May 27,
2021)
On 18Aug2023, Matt Burns wrote
(in article<169238912661.107542.12324584839207904806.XPN@5150.chad>):
Laz Mann wrote:
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-7, Jebediah Grainger wrote: >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of
Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never >>>> Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential >>>> ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th >>>> Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office >>>> if, having taken an oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal >>>> official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.” Section Three >>>> was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might >>>> (as indeed they did) elect former Confederates to Congress and pursue
politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a >>>> half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay >>>> moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments >>>> put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading
conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in >>>> an article by Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump
engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the >>>> Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not >>>> even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are committed to the >>>> Constitution should take note and say so.”
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried to get a >>> hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders should be >>> tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
Did some research on this claim and it appears to be... true? This guy
seems to be the real deal as far as intelligent, predictive political
science and analysis goes.
https://www.facebook.com/100063535691611/videos/in-my-room-25-full-show-breaki
ng-down-validating-xiv3/775060330041602
In My Room #25 (Full Show): Breaking Down & Validating #XIV3
Under Amendment XIV Section 3 of the US Constitution there are 147
congresspeople currently seated who arguably should not be, to say
nothing of hundreds if not thousands of others. We'll talk about what
"arguments" are involved here for and against, and why in the end they
all come down to these people aided, abetted, or participated in an
insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution to which they swore
an oath, and there are therefore constitutionally disqualified from
office. All that, your comments, and much more! (Live broadcast May 27,
2021)
No girls to molest tonight, John Henry?
On 18Aug2023, Matt Burns wrote
(in article<169238912661.107542.12324584839207904806.XPN@5150.chad>):
Laz Mann wrote:
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-7, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of
Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never >> > > Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential >> > > ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th >> > > Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office
if, having taken an oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal
official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.” Section Three >> > > was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might
(as indeed they did) elect former Confederates to Congress and pursue
politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a
half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay
moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments
put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading
conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in
an article by Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump
engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the
Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not
even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are committed to the
Constitution should take note and say so.”
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried to get a >> > hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders should be >> > tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
Did some research on this claim and it appears to be... true? This guy
seems to be the real deal as far as intelligent, predictive political
science and analysis goes.
https://www.facebook.com/100063535691611/videos/in-my-room-25-full-show-breaki
ng-down-validating-xiv3/775060330041602
In My Room #25 (Full Show): Breaking Down & Validating #XIV3
Under Amendment XIV Section 3 of the US Constitution there are 147
congresspeople currently seated who arguably should not be, to say
nothing of hundreds if not thousands of others. We'll talk about what
"arguments" are involved here for and against, and why in the end they
all come down to these people aided, abetted, or participated in an
insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution to which they swore
an oath, and there are therefore constitutionally disqualified from
office. All that, your comments, and much more! (Live broadcast May 27,
2021)
No girls to molest tonight, John Henry?
Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 18Aug2023, Matt Burns wrote
(in article<169238912661.107542.12324584839207904806.XPN@5150.chad>):
Laz Mann wrote:
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-7, Jebediah
Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University
of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation
that Never Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024
Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a
long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three
provides that no person can hold political office if, having
taken an oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal
official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.”
Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former
Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect former
Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation
of war by other means. But the century and a half after the
Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay
moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the
arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law
Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and
Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society
co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they
argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no
more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not
even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are
committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.”
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried
to get a hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders
should be tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
Did some research on this claim and it appears to be... true? This
guy seems to be the real deal as far as intelligent, predictive
political science and analysis goes.
https://www.facebook.com/100063535691611/videos/in-my-room-25-full-sh
ow-breaki ng-down-validating-xiv3/775060330041602
In My Room #25 (Full Show): Breaking Down & Validating #XIV3
Under Amendment XIV Section 3 of the US Constitution there are 147
congresspeople currently seated who arguably should not be, to say
nothing of hundreds if not thousands of others. We'll talk about
what "arguments" are involved here for and against, and why in the
end they all come down to these people aided, abetted, or
participated in an insurrection or rebellion against the
Constitution to which they swore an oath, and there are therefore
constitutionally disqualified from office. All that, your comments,
and much more! (Live broadcast May 27, 2021)
No girls to molest tonight, John Henry?
As far as I'm aware, John Henry is voluntarily celibate, so this line
of attack has no meaning.
How about the other woman he abused that posted a message to people advising that JOHN HENRY DEJONG is a pedophile?
The age of consent in Michigan is 16.
Matt Burns <matt_burns@hotmail.com> wrote in news:169248682326.95692.4668969982475573800.XPN@5150.chad:
Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 18Aug2023, Matt Burns wrote
(in article<169238912661.107542.12324584839207904806.XPN@5150.chad>):
Laz Mann wrote:
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-7, Jebediah
Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University
of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three
provides that no person can hold political office if, having
taken an oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.”
Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect former Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation
of war by other means. But the century and a half after the
Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law
Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no
more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not
even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are
committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.”
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried
to get a hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders should be tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
Did some research on this claim and it appears to be... true? This
guy seems to be the real deal as far as intelligent, predictive political science and analysis goes.
https://www.facebook.com/100063535691611/videos/in-my-room-25-full-sh ow-breaki ng-down-validating-xiv3/775060330041602
In My Room #25 (Full Show): Breaking Down & Validating #XIV3
Under Amendment XIV Section 3 of the US Constitution there are 147 congresspeople currently seated who arguably should not be, to say nothing of hundreds if not thousands of others. We'll talk about
what "arguments" are involved here for and against, and why in the
end they all come down to these people aided, abetted, or
participated in an insurrection or rebellion against the
Constitution to which they swore an oath, and there are therefore constitutionally disqualified from office. All that, your comments,
and much more! (Live broadcast May 27, 2021)
No girls to molest tonight, John Henry?
As far as I'm aware, John Henry is voluntarily celibate, so this line
of attack has no meaning.
"Voluntarily" is doing a lot of heavy lifting. I usderstand it's not for
a lack of trying. How about that stripper JOHN HENRY DEJONG tried to con
into moving in with him? Word is she took the money and ran off to her
new boyfriend.
How about the other woman he abused that posted a message to people
advising that JOHN HENRY DEJONG is a pedophile?
Sounds to me that women with any sense are repulsed. Perhaps he should
just drink the bleach.
Matt Burns <matt_burns@hotmail.com> wrote in news:169248682326.95692.4668969982475573800.XPN@5150.chad:
Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 18Aug2023, Matt Burns wrote
(in article<169238912661.107542.12324584839207904806.XPN@5150.chad>):
Laz Mann wrote:
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-7, Jebediah
Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University
of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation
that Never Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024
Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a
long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three
provides that no person can hold political office if, having
taken an oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal
official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.”
Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former
Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect former
Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation
of war by other means. But the century and a half after the
Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay
moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the
arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law
Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and
Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society
co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they
argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no
more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not
even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are
committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.”
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried
to get a hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders
should be tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
Did some research on this claim and it appears to be... true? This
guy seems to be the real deal as far as intelligent, predictive
political science and analysis goes.
https://www.facebook.com/100063535691611/videos/in-my-room-25-full-sh
ow-breaki ng-down-validating-xiv3/775060330041602
In My Room #25 (Full Show): Breaking Down & Validating #XIV3
Under Amendment XIV Section 3 of the US Constitution there are 147
congresspeople currently seated who arguably should not be, to say
nothing of hundreds if not thousands of others. We'll talk about
what "arguments" are involved here for and against, and why in the
end they all come down to these people aided, abetted, or
participated in an insurrection or rebellion against the
Constitution to which they swore an oath, and there are therefore
constitutionally disqualified from office. All that, your comments,
and much more! (Live broadcast May 27, 2021)
No girls to molest tonight, John Henry?
As far as I'm aware, John Henry is voluntarily celibate, so this line
of attack has no meaning.
"Voluntarily" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.
I usderstand it's not for
a lack of trying. How about that stripper JOHN HENRY DEJONG tried to con
into moving in with him? Word is she took the money and ran off to her
new boyfriend.
How about the other woman he abused that posted a message to people
advising that JOHN HENRY DEJONG is a pedophile?
Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 18Aug2023, Matt Burns wrote
(in article<169238912661.107542.12324584839207904806.XPN@5150.chad>):
Laz Mann wrote:
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-7, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of
Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never >>>>> Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential >>>>> ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th >>>>> Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office
if, having taken an oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal
official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.” Section Three >>>>> was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might
(as indeed they did) elect former Confederates to Congress and pursue >>>>> politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a >>>>> half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay >>>>> moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments
put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading
conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in >>>>> an article by Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump
engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the >>>>> Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not >>>>> even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are committed to the >>>>> Constitution should take note and say so.”
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried to get a >>>> hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders should be >>>> tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
Did some research on this claim and it appears to be... true? This guy
seems to be the real deal as far as intelligent, predictive political
science and analysis goes.
https://www.facebook.com/100063535691611/videos/in-my-room-25-full-show-breaki
ng-down-validating-xiv3/775060330041602
In My Room #25 (Full Show): Breaking Down & Validating #XIV3
Under Amendment XIV Section 3 of the US Constitution there are 147
congresspeople currently seated who arguably should not be, to say
nothing of hundreds if not thousands of others. We'll talk about what
"arguments" are involved here for and against, and why in the end they
all come down to these people aided, abetted, or participated in an
insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution to which they swore
an oath, and there are therefore constitutionally disqualified from
office. All that, your comments, and much more! (Live broadcast May 27,
2021)
No girls to molest tonight, John Henry?
As far as I'm aware, John Henry is voluntarily celibate, so this line of attack has no meaning.
Davey Zimmerman #274 wrote:
Matt Burns <matt_burns@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:169248682326.95692.4668969982475573800.XPN@5150.chad:
Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 18Aug2023, Matt Burns wrote
(in article<169238912661.107542.12324584839207904806.XPN@5150.chad>):
Laz Mann wrote:
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:22:04â¯AM UTC-7, Jebediah
Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University >>>>>>> of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation >>>>>>> that Never Was: Reconstructing Americaâs Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024
Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a
long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three
provides that no person can hold political office if, having
taken an oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal
official, they âengaged in insurrection or rebellion.â >>>>>>> Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former
Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect former
Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation >>>>>>> of war by other means. But the century and a half after the
Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay
moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the >>>>>>> arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law
Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and
Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society
co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they >>>>>>> argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no
more than the Constitution demands. â[T]he case is not
even close,â Baude and Paulsen declare. âAll who are
committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.â
See JH's archives. John pointed this out ages ago and even tried
to get a hashtag about it going: #xiv3
It isn't just Trump who's ineligible. Many current officeholders
should be tossed, according to what
John's research has uncovered.
Did some research on this claim and it appears to be... true? This
guy seems to be the real deal as far as intelligent, predictive
political science and analysis goes.
https://www.facebook.com/100063535691611/videos/in-my-room-25-full-sh >>>>> ow-breaki ng-down-validating-xiv3/775060330041602
In My Room #25 (Full Show): Breaking Down & Validating #XIV3
Under Amendment XIV Section 3 of the US Constitution there are 147
congresspeople currently seated who arguably should not be, to say
nothing of hundreds if not thousands of others. We'll talk about
what "arguments" are involved here for and against, and why in the
end they all come down to these people aided, abetted, or
participated in an insurrection or rebellion against the
Constitution to which they swore an oath, and there are therefore
constitutionally disqualified from office. All that, your comments,
and much more! (Live broadcast May 27, 2021)
No girls to molest tonight, John Henry?
As far as I'm aware, John Henry is voluntarily celibate, so this line
of attack has no meaning.
"Voluntarily" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.
Your subject line is nonsensical. "Volcel" is the appropriate
terminology.
I usderstand it's not for
a lack of trying. How about that stripper JOHN HENRY DEJONG tried to con
into moving in with him? Word is she took the money and ran off to her
new boyfriend.
Cam workers aren't strippers.
How about the other woman he abused that posted a message to people
advising that JOHN HENRY DEJONG is a pedophile?
The age of consent in Michigan is 16.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pMsupport the Constitution as a state or federal official, they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.” Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect former Confederates to Congress
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America’s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken an oath to
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. “[T]he case is not even close,” Baude and Paulsen declare. “All who are committed to the
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:22:04PM UTC-4, Jebediah Grainger wrote:support the Constitution as a state or federal official, they ?engaged in insurrection or rebellion.? Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America?s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken an oath to
co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. ?[T]he case is not even close,? Baude and Paulsen declare.January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society
Some state election officials want to keep him off state ballots.
It's the right thing to do even if the Skeeters of the world are going to wet their pants and throw temper tantrums from now til the end of time.
In article <50275760-78ff-4b96...@googlegroups.com>,support the Constitution as a state or federal official, they ?engaged in insurrection or rebellion.? Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:22:04 PM UTC-4, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America?s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken an oath to
former Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of only historical interest.Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. ?[T]he case is not even close,? Baude and Paulsen declare.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist
?All who are committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.? That leaves ot the left.
Some state election officials want to keep him off state ballots.It's the only way you can win.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 3:50:50 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <50275760-78ff-4b96...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
of war by other means. But the century and a half after the Civil War,
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:22:04 PM UTC-4, Jebediah Grainger wrote: >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of
Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that
Never Was: Reconstructing America?s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024
Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected
part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can
hold political office if, having taken an oath to support the
Constitution as a state or federal official, they ?engaged in
insurrection or rebellion.? Section Three was designed to respond to
the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect >> former Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation
brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of
only historical interest.
?All who are committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.?
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the
arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by
leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes
Paulsen and in an article by Federalist Society co-founder Steven
Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring
him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution
demands. ?[T]he case is not even close,? Baude and Paulsen declare.
That leaves ot the left.
It's the only way you can win.
Some state election officials want to keep him off state ballots.
We need to throw Proud Boys in jail, "It's the only way you can win!! WAAAAAAH!"
We need to throw Trump off the ballot "it's the only way you can win! WAAAAAH!"
It's funny you come up with all this stuff, because -- if I recall
correctly -- Joe beat Trump who was not only on the ballot but IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Yes, no?
And Proud Boys were running wild all over the place. Riiiiiiiiiiight?
So why exactly are you making excuses for something that ALREADY HAPPENED?
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 3:50:50PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:to support the Constitution as a state or federal official, they ?engaged in insurrection or rebellion.? Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect
In article <50275760-78ff-4b96...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:22:04 PM UTC-4, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America?s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken an oath
Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. ?[T]he case is not even close,? Baude and Paulsenformer Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist
?All who are committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.? That leaves ot the left.
Some state election officials want to keep him off state ballots.It's the only way you can win.
We need to throw Proud Boys in jail, "It's the only way you can win!! WAAAAAAH!"
We need to throw Trump off the ballot "it's the only way you can win! WAAAAAH!"
It's funny you come up with all this stuff, because -- if I recall correctly -- Joe beat Trump who was not only on the ballot but IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Yes, no?
And Proud Boys were running wild all over the place. Riiiiiiiiiiight?
So why exactly are you making excuses for something that ALREADY HAPPENED?
In article <a5a6a105-05b4-499a...@googlegroups.com>,oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal official, they ?engaged in insurrection or rebellion.? Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did) elect
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 3:50:50 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <50275760-78ff-4b96...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:22:04 PM UTC-4, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America?s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken an
Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. ?[T]he case is not even close,? Baude and Paulsenformer Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist
declare.
?All who are committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.? That leaves ot the left.
Some state election officials want to keep him off state ballots.It's the only way you can win.
We need to throw Proud Boys in jail, "It's the only way you can win!! WAAAAAAH!"Good luck with that.
We need to throw Trump off the ballot "it's the only way you can win! WAAAAAH!"
It's funny you come up with all this stuff, because -- if I recall correctly -- Joe beat Trump who was not only on the ballot but IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Yes, no?
And Proud Boys were running wild all over the place. Riiiiiiiiiiight?
So why exactly are you making excuses for something that ALREADY HAPPENED?You really need therapy
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 11:07:20AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal official, they ?engaged in insurrection or rebellion.? Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did)
In article <a5a6a105-05b4-499a...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 3:50:50 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <50275760-78ff-4b96...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:22:04 PM UTC-4, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America?s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken an
Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. ?[T]he case is not even close,? Baude and Paulsenformer Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by Federalist
declare.
?All who are committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.?
That leaves ot the left.
Some state election officials want to keep him off state ballots.It's the only way you can win.
We need to throw Proud Boys in jail, "It's the only way you can win!! WAAAAAAH!"Good luck with that.
We need to throw Trump off the ballot "it's the only way you can win! WAAAAAH!"
It's funny you come up with all this stuff, because -- if I recall correctly -- Joe beat Trump who was not only on the ballot but IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Yes, no?
And Proud Boys were running wild all over the place. Riiiiiiiiiiight?
So why exactly are you making excuses for something that ALREADY HAPPENED?You really need therapy
That's it --- run away you coward.
You really need to stop LYING.
Jason
In article <244aef91-dbc9-4b9b...@googlegroups.com>,oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal official, they ?engaged in insurrection or rebellion.? Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did)
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 11:07:20 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a5a6a105-05b4-499a...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 3:50:50 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <50275760-78ff-4b96...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:22:04 PM UTC-4, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America?s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken an
electFederalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. ?[T]he case is not even close,? Baude and Paulsen
former Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by
declare.
?All who are committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.?
That leaves ot the left.
Some state election officials want to keep him off state ballots.It's the only way you can win.
We need to throw Proud Boys in jail, "It's the only way you can win!! WAAAAAAH!"Good luck with that.
We need to throw Trump off the ballot "it's the only way you can win! WAAAAAH!"
It's funny you come up with all this stuff, because -- if I recall correctly -- Joe beat Trump who was not only on the ballot but IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Yes, no?
And Proud Boys were running wild all over the place. Riiiiiiiiiiight?
So why exactly are you making excuses for something that ALREADY HAPPENED?You really need therapy
That's it --- run away you coward.
You really need to stop LYING.
At this point with your spinning I have no idea what you're talking
about.
Jason
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 3:42:04PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:an oath to support the Constitution as a state or federal official, they ?engaged in insurrection or rebellion.? Section Three was designed to respond to the danger that former Confederate states might (as indeed they did)
In article <244aef91-dbc9-4b9b...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 11:07:20 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a5a6a105-05b4-499a...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 3:50:50 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <50275760-78ff-4b96...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:22:04 PM UTC-4, Jebediah Grainger wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mk4nfGX-pM
BY KERMIT ROOSEVELT III AUGUST 15, 2023 11:46 AM EDT
Roosevelt is a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law and the author of The Nation that Never Was: Reconstructing America?s Story.
Does the Constitution permit Donald Trump to be on the 2024 Presidential ballot? The question arises because of a long-neglected part of the 14th Amendment. Section Three provides that no person can hold political office if, having taken
Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi. Trump engaged in insurrection, they argue, and declaring him ineligible for the Presidency is no more than the Constitution demands. ?[T]he case is not even close,? Baude andelect
former Confederates to Congress and pursue politics as the continuation of war by other means. But the century and a half after the Civil War, brought no insurrections, and Section Three lay moribund, an object of only historical interest.
January 6, 2021 changed that. At least, it did if you accept the arguments put forward in the University of Pennsylvania law Review by leading conservative originalists William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen and in an article by
declare.
?All who are committed to the Constitution should take note and say so.?
That leaves ot the left.
Some state election officials want to keep him off state ballots.It's the only way you can win.
We need to throw Proud Boys in jail, "It's the only way you can win!! WAAAAAAH!"Good luck with that.
We need to throw Trump off the ballot "it's the only way you can win! WAAAAAH!"
It's funny you come up with all this stuff, because -- if I recall correctly -- Joe beat Trump who was not only on the ballot but IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Yes, no?
And Proud Boys were running wild all over the place. Riiiiiiiiiiight?
So why exactly are you making excuses for something that ALREADY HAPPENED?You really need therapy
That's it --- run away you coward.
You really need to stop LYING.
At this point with your spinning I have no idea what you're talking
about.
I'm talking about how Joe Biden went head to head with God Emperor Trump and WON. That happened...um, around, 2020 if i'm not mistaken.
Please try again and try not to leave anything out.
You're ugly too.
Jason
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 118:59:39 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,363 |