Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not
indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as
containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a
"Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups. alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others have
been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly, these
groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging threads
for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might be able to
get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so remove the
problematic posts from Google search results for your name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or violent content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated goods and services at the group, conversation, or message level" found in the group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin this group and solve at
least one of your problems. A solid effort would need to involve
reporting individual messages as well as threads/"conversations". As
well, for illegal content you'd want to report messages through the troubleshooting interface at https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting "http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern Google’s Terms of Service or content and product policies".
Google encourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but you
must file each report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here, which
may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual property
rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you believe violates
the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review the material and
consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to it" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could
support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went all-in reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a violation,
such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to take action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be saved. This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups. You can do
it.
On 29Jul2023, Liz Bentley wrote (in article
<ua3bh4$2l9ed$1@dont-email.me>):
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not
indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as
containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a
"Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups.
alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others have
been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly, these
groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging threads
for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might be able to
get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so remove the
problematic posts from Google search results for your name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or violent
content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated goods and
services at the group, conversation, or message level" found in the
group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin this group and
solve at least one of your problems. A solid effort would need to
involve reporting individual messages as well as
threads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content you'd want to
report messages through the troubleshooting interface at
https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more
products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
"http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern Google’s
Terms of Service or content and product policies". Google encourages
reporting the same content using both paths, "but you must file each
report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here, which
may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual property
rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you believe
violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review the material
and consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to it" - https://
support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could
support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your
complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went all-in
reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a
violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to take
action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
saved.
This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups. You can
do it.
Why are you using Ubuntu 18.04, John Henry?
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 17:19:01 -0600, Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 29Jul2023, Liz Bentley wrote (in article
<ua3bh4$2l9ed$1@dont-email.me>):
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not
indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as
containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a
"Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups.
alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others
have been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly,
these groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search
engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging
threads for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might
be able to get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so
remove the problematic posts from Google search results for your
name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or
violent content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated
goods and services at the group, conversation, or message level"
found in the group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin
this group and solve at least one of your problems. A solid effort
would need to involve reporting individual messages as well as
threads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content you'd want to
report messages through the troubleshooting interface at
https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more
products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
"http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern
Google’s Terms of Service or content and product policies". Google
encourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but you
must file each report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here,
which may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual
property rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you
believe violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review
the material and consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to
it" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could
support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your
complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went
all-in reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a
violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to
take action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
saved.
This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups. You
can do it.
Why are you using Ubuntu 18.04, John Henry?
I seem to recall some lowlifes here bandying about the notions that
John Henry had no idea how to use Linux, refused to learn, was "too
good" for Linux, and so on. There was also an assertion that John
Henry only had one PC which he'd removed from a dumpster. The pond
scum here also ridiculed John Henry for being stuck on Windows 10 and
not being able to upgrade to Windows 11 as he'd expressed a desire to.
So which is it? Is John Henry now capable of using Linux just because
it's a convenient avenue of attack? He's now using Linux instead of
Windows just because it's a handy way to bash him? He has multiple
boxes instead of only the dumpster rescue just because that's a good
way to tear him down right now regardless of what's been claimed
before and in spite of the fact that it makes no sense?
John Henry went out of his way to conceal your name when issuing
direct criticism of you. Where is your gratitude for his mercy? Where
is your acknowledgment of wrongdoing? Where is your public apology?
Why do you continue to provoke, insult, and manipulate instead of
helping all of us to understand your malicious actions over the past
two decades? You haven't even made an attempt to correct the record;
it's just been radio silence followed by sniping. Have you no honor?
Have you no decency?
If John Henry decides to take action and force Google's hand with
regard to Google Groups' feed of RSPW, I hope you realize that your playground is at risk. The only strictly on-charter discussion in this
group emanates from Terrence Clay, a Google Groups user. Jason Todd
generates a lot of the remaining traffic, is a longtime RSPWer, and occasionally makes reference to pro-wrestling - and he's a Google
Groups user, too. Once these folks have their access cut off, and
there's no longer any on- charter discussion happening here, John
Henry might just post an ad hoc RFD for the group's removal to news.announce.newgroups and news.groups.proposals. No on-charter
traffic is enough of a reason, and Google banning the group will be
prima facie evidence of abuse, illegality, and unacceptable behavior.
Seems like an easy road for John Henry to shut this cesspool down for
good and finally remove the stench from this dump from his person for
good.
If I were you, I'd tread lightly and choose your future words very
carefully. It would be a real shame if John Henry had to exercise his towering intellect, vast knowledge, exceptional charisma, and
preternatural tenacity to shut down your favorite playground.
Liz Bentley <throwaway@fake.address> wrote in news:ua4f60$2s28i$1@dont-email.me:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 17:19:01 -0600, Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 29Jul2023, Liz Bentley wrote (in article <ua3bh4$2l9ed$1@dont-email.me>):
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a "Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups. alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others
have been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly, these groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging threads for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might
be able to get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so
remove the problematic posts from Google search results for your
name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or
violent content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated goods and services at the group, conversation, or message level"
found in the group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin
this group and solve at least one of your problems. A solid effort would need to involve reporting individual messages as well as threads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content you'd want to report messages through the troubleshooting interface at https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting "http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern
Google’s Terms of Service or content and product policies". Google encourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but you
must file each report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here,
which may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual property rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you believe violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review the material and consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to
it" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went
all-in reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to
take action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be saved.
This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups. You
can do it.
Why are you using Ubuntu 18.04, John Henry?
I seem to recall some lowlifes here bandying about the notions that
John Henry had no idea how to use Linux, refused to learn, was "too
good" for Linux, and so on. There was also an assertion that John
Henry only had one PC which he'd removed from a dumpster. The pond
scum here also ridiculed John Henry for being stuck on Windows 10 and
not being able to upgrade to Windows 11 as he'd expressed a desire to.
So which is it? Is John Henry now capable of using Linux just because
it's a convenient avenue of attack? He's now using Linux instead of
Windows just because it's a handy way to bash him? He has multiple
boxes instead of only the dumpster rescue just because that's a good
way to tear him down right now regardless of what's been claimed
before and in spite of the fact that it makes no sense?
John Henry went out of his way to conceal your name when issuing
direct criticism of you. Where is your gratitude for his mercy? Where
is your acknowledgment of wrongdoing? Where is your public apology?
Why do you continue to provoke, insult, and manipulate instead of
helping all of us to understand your malicious actions over the past
two decades? You haven't even made an attempt to correct the record;
it's just been radio silence followed by sniping. Have you no honor?
Have you no decency?
If John Henry decides to take action and force Google's hand with
regard to Google Groups' feed of RSPW, I hope you realize that your playground is at risk. The only strictly on-charter discussion in this group emanates from Terrence Clay, a Google Groups user. Jason Todd generates a lot of the remaining traffic, is a longtime RSPWer, and occasionally makes reference to pro-wrestling - and he's a Google
Groups user, too. Once these folks have their access cut off, and
there's no longer any on- charter discussion happening here, John
Henry might just post an ad hoc RFD for the group's removal to news.announce.newgroups and news.groups.proposals. No on-charter
traffic is enough of a reason, and Google banning the group will be
prima facie evidence of abuse, illegality, and unacceptable behavior.
Seems like an easy road for John Henry to shut this cesspool down for
good and finally remove the stench from this dump from his person for
good.
If I were you, I'd tread lightly and choose your future words very carefully. It would be a real shame if John Henry had to exercise his towering intellect, vast knowledge, exceptional charisma, and
preternatural tenacity to shut down your favorite playground.
Yawn.
I thought you were going to spam everyone to death instead?
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not
indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as
containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a
"Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups. alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others have
been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly, these
groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging
threads for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might be
able to get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so remove the problematic posts from Google search results for your name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or violent content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated goods and services at the group, conversation, or message level" found in the
group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin this group and
solve at least one of your problems. A solid effort would need to
involve reporting individual messages as well as
threads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content you'd want to
report messages through the troubleshooting interface at https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting "http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern
Google’s Terms of Service or content and product policies". Google encourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but you must
file each report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here,
which may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual
property rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you
believe violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review
the material and consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to
it" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could
support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went
all-in reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to take action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
saved. This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups.
You can do it.
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 17:19:01 -0600, Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 29Jul2023, Liz Bentley wrote (in article
<ua3bh4$2l9ed$1@dont-email.me>):
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not
indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as
containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a
"Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups.
alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others have
been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly, these
groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging threads >>> for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might be able to
get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so remove the
problematic posts from Google search results for your name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or violent
content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated goods and
services at the group, conversation, or message level" found in the
group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin this group and
solve at least one of your problems. A solid effort would need to
involve reporting individual messages as well as
threads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content you'd want to
report messages through the troubleshooting interface at
https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more
products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
"http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern Google’s
Terms of Service or content and product policies". Google encourages
reporting the same content using both paths, "but you must file each
report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here, which
may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual property
rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you believe
violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review the material >>> and consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to it" - https://
support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could
support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your
complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went all-in
reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a
violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to take
action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
saved.
This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups. You can
do it.
Why are you using Ubuntu 18.04, John Henry?
I seem to recall some lowlifes here bandying about the notions that John Henry had no idea how to use Linux, refused to learn, was "too good" for Linux, and so on. There was also an assertion that John Henry only had
one PC which he'd removed from a dumpster. The pond scum here also
ridiculed John Henry for being stuck on Windows 10 and not being able to upgrade to Windows 11 as he'd expressed a desire to. So which is it? Is
John Henry now capable of using Linux just because it's a convenient
avenue of attack? He's now using Linux instead of Windows just because
it's a handy way to bash him? He has multiple boxes instead of only the dumpster rescue just because that's a good way to tear him down right now regardless of what's been claimed before and in spite of the fact that it makes no sense?
John Henry went out of his way to conceal your name when issuing direct criticism of you. Where is your gratitude for his mercy? Where is your acknowledgment of wrongdoing? Where is your public apology? Why do you continue to provoke, insult, and manipulate instead of helping all of us
to understand your malicious actions over the past two decades? You
haven't even made an attempt to correct the record; it's just been radio silence followed by sniping. Have you no honor? Have you no decency?
If John Henry decides to take action and force Google's hand with regard
to Google Groups' feed of RSPW, I hope you realize that your playground
is at risk. The only strictly on-charter discussion in this group
emanates from Terrence Clay, a Google Groups user. Jason Todd generates a
lot of the remaining traffic, is a longtime RSPWer, and occasionally
makes reference to pro-wrestling - and he's a Google Groups user, too.
Once these folks have their access cut off, and there's no longer any on- charter discussion happening here, John Henry might just post an ad hoc
RFD for the group's removal to news.announce.newgroups and news.groups.proposals. No on-charter traffic is enough of a reason, and Google banning the group will be prima facie evidence of abuse,
illegality, and unacceptable behavior.
Seems like an easy road for John Henry to shut this cesspool down for
good and finally remove the stench from this dump from his person for
good.
If I were you, I'd tread lightly and choose your future words very
carefully. It would be a real shame if John Henry had to exercise his towering intellect, vast knowledge, exceptional charisma, and
preternatural tenacity to shut down your favorite playground.
Laz Pinto <throwaway@fake.address> wrote in news:ua3bh4$2l9ed$1@dont-email.me:
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not
indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as
containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a
"Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups.
alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others
have been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly,
these groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search
engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging
threads for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might
be able to get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so remove
the problematic posts from Google search results for your name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or violent
content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated goods
and services at the group, conversation, or message level" found in
the group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin this group
and solve at least one of your problems. A solid effort would need
to involve reporting individual messages as well as
threads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content you'd want to
report messages through the troubleshooting interface at
https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more
products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
"http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern
Google’s Terms of Service or content and product policies". Google
encourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but you must
file each report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here,
which may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual
property rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you
believe violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review
the material and consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to
it" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could
support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your
complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went
all-in reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a
violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to
take action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
saved. This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups.
You can do it.
Google is as well-known for their prompt responsiveness to complaints
as John Henry DeJong is for his diligence in executing projects
requiring more than superficial effort. Godspeed!
"Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses)" <mark@rube.con> wrote in news:ua4t5d$1a92q$1@paganini.bofh.team:
Laz Pinto <throwaway@fake.address> wrote in
news:ua3bh4$2l9ed$1@dont-email.me:
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not
indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as
containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a
"Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups.
alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others
have been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly,
these groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search
engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging
threads for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might
be able to get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so remove
the problematic posts from Google search results for your name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or violent
content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated goods
and services at the group, conversation, or message level" found in
the group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin this group
and solve at least one of your problems. A solid effort would need
to involve reporting individual messages as well as
threads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content you'd want to
report messages through the troubleshooting interface at
https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more
products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
"http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern
Google’s Terms of Service or content and product policies". Google
encourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but you must
file each report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here,
which may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual
property rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you
believe violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review
the material and consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to
it" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could
support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your
complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went
all-in reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a
violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to
take action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
saved. This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups.
You can do it.
Google is as well-known for their prompt responsiveness to complaints
as John Henry DeJong is for his diligence in executing projects
requiring more than superficial effort. Godspeed!
JOHN HENRY DEJONG will do nothing and expect others to do his dirty work
for him. After all, he's done a great job cleaning up all the parody
sites about him that have been around for the last 15 years, so this
will be no different.
Five years ago he was going to file a police report on Alexander Cain
and if that didn't work out, he was going down there to beat the crap
out of him, file a lawsuit and evict him.
In a shocking revelation, it turns out JOHN HENRY DEJONG lied about all
of that. Since then, it's another set of enemies who had nothing to do
with Cain that he refuses to name.
Let me know when alt.bonehead.john-henry gets cleaned up too.
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in news:XnsB0516B6FA69C9ReallyNotChad@135.181.20.170:
"Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses)" <mark@rube.con> wrote in
news:ua4t5d$1a92q$1@paganini.bofh.team:
Laz Pinto <throwaway@fake.address> wrote in
news:ua3bh4$2l9ed$1@dont-email.me:
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not
indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as
containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a
"Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups.
alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others
have been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly,
these groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search
engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging
threads for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might
be able to get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so
remove the problematic posts from Google search results for your
name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or
violent content, shared personal info, or the promotion of
regulated goods and services at the group, conversation, or message
level" found in the group could be the push needed for Google to
dustbin this group and solve at least one of your problems. A
solid effort would need to involve reporting individual messages as
well as threads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content
you'd want to report messages through the troubleshooting interface
at https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See
more products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
"http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern
Google’s Terms of Service or content and product policies".
Google encourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but
you must file each report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here,
which may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual
property rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you
believe violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll
review the material and consider blocking, limiting, or removing
access to it" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could
support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your
complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went
all-in reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or
a violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to
take action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
saved. This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google
Groups. You can do it.
Google is as well-known for their prompt responsiveness to
complaints as John Henry DeJong is for his diligence in executing
projects requiring more than superficial effort. Godspeed!
JOHN HENRY DEJONG will do nothing and expect others to do his dirty
work for him. After all, he's done a great job cleaning up all the
parody sites about him that have been around for the last 15 years,
so this will be no different.
He can't clean up those parody pages because Facebook's algorithms
have been influenced by a worldwide fake liberal consipracy to silence
him and shut him down. Every time he clicks report, the plutocrat
algorithm changes it into a like.
Five years ago he was going to file a police report on Alexander Cain
and if that didn't work out, he was going down there to beat the crap
out of him, file a lawsuit and evict him.
He didn't specify his destination in the recent rant where he
threatened to create papier mache mallets and go hitchhiking or
whatever. It's possible Cain is still in danger.
In a shocking revelation, it turns out JOHN HENRY DEJONG lied about
all of that. Since then, it's another set of enemies who had nothing
to do with Cain that he refuses to name.
Let me know when alt.bonehead.john-henry gets cleaned up too.
alt.bonehead-john-henry will be referred to the FBI and Attorney
General as soon as the matter of his former landlord cutting the brake
lines to his Jeep is handled by the City Council.
On 29Jul2023, Davey Zimmerman #274 wrote:
are notLiz Bentley <<throwaway@fake.address> wrote in
news:ua4f60$2s28i$1@dont-email.me:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 17:19:01 -0600, Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 29Jul2023, Liz Bentley wrote (in article
<<ua3bh4$2l9ed$1@dont-email.me>):
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups
asindexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified
yield acontaining spam, malware, or other malicious content" only
Groups."Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google
othersalt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and
importantly,have been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most
searchthese groups and their content are not indexed in Google's
flaggingengine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been
mightthreads for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you
sobe able to get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing
yourremove the problematic posts from Google search results for
regulatedname.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or
violent content, shared personal info, or the promotion of
level"goods and services at the group, conversation, or message
dustbinfound in the group could be the push needed for Google to
effortthis group and solve at least one of your problems. A solid
aswould need to involve reporting individual messages as well
want tothreads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content you'd
report messages through the troubleshooting interface at
See morehttps://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905
products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
"http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern
Google¹s Terms of Service or content and product policies".
youencourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but
here,must file each report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media
intellectualwhich may be challengeable as infringement of your
youproperty rights. "If you see content on a Google product that
reviewbelieve violates the law or your rights, let us know. We¹ll
access tothe material and consider blocking, limiting, or removing
couldit" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which
yoursupport formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of
wentcomplaining beyond messages which affect you personally and
abuse or aall-in reporting everything which could be constituted as
Google toviolation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause
falsetake action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always
can beflags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation
Yousaved.
This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups.
thatcan do it.
Why are you using Ubuntu 18.04, John Henry?
I seem to recall some lowlifes here bandying about the notions
"tooJohn Henry had no idea how to use Linux, refused to learn, was
pondgood" for Linux, and so on. There was also an assertion that John
Henry only had one PC which he'd removed from a dumpster. The
andscum here also ridiculed John Henry for being stuck on Windows 10
desire to.not being able to upgrade to Windows 11 as he'd expressed a
becauseSo which is it? Is John Henry now capable of using Linux just
ofit's a convenient avenue of attack? He's now using Linux instead
multipleWindows just because it's a handy way to bash him? He has
goodboxes instead of only the dumpster rescue just because that's a
Whereway to tear him down right now regardless of what's been claimed
before and in spite of the fact that it makes no sense?
John Henry went out of his way to conceal your name when issuing
direct criticism of you. Where is your gratitude for his mercy?
apology?is your acknowledgment of wrongdoing? Where is your public
pastWhy do you continue to provoke, insult, and manipulate instead of
helping all of us to understand your malicious actions over the
record;two decades? You haven't even made an attempt to correct the
honor?it's just been radio silence followed by sniping. Have you no
yourHave you no decency?
If John Henry decides to take action and force Google's hand with
regard to Google Groups' feed of RSPW, I hope you realize that
thisplayground is at risk. The only strictly on-charter discussion in
Toddgroup emanates from Terrence Clay, a Google Groups user. Jason
andgenerates a lot of the remaining traffic, is a longtime RSPWer,
beoccasionally makes reference to pro-wrestling - and he's a Google
Groups user, too. Once these folks have their access cut off, and
there's no longer any on- charter discussion happening here, John
Henry might just post an ad hoc RFD for the group's removal to
news.announce.newgroups and news.groups.proposals. No on-charter
traffic is enough of a reason, and Google banning the group will
behavior.prima facie evidence of abuse, illegality, and unacceptable
for
Seems like an easy road for John Henry to shut this cesspool down
forgood and finally remove the stench from this dump from his person
verygood.
If I were you, I'd tread lightly and choose your future words
hiscarefully. It would be a real shame if John Henry had to exercise
towering intellect, vast knowledge, exceptional charisma, and
preternatural tenacity to shut down your favorite playground.
Yawn.
I thought you were going to spam everyone to death instead?
Ubuntu is Linux for toddlers. 18.04 is no longer supported.acquired
John Henry DeJong doesn¹t like questions, especially about how he
another computer just to run an old version of shitty Linux on.
Is it true that Chad Bryant was involuntarily committed?John Henry DeJong has holes in his shoes again so that we can see his socks.
"[Chad's] been 5150'd multiple times"
"[Chad] has been involuntarily committed to psychiatric confinement"
A close friend of Lee Bryant said these things. He is not known to lie.
Are they true? What's the story behind this?
On 1Aug2023, Jean Dubois wrote:
"[Chad's] been 5150'd multiple times"
"[Chad] has been involuntarily committed to psychiatric confinement"
A close friend of Lee Bryant said these things. He is not known to lie.
Are they true? What's the story behind this?
John Henry DeJong is known to lie,
John Henry DeJong should be careful about the lies he tells because of sections 750.370& 750.371 in the Michigan Compiled Laws.
Taro Tsujimoto <tsujimoto@sabres.com> wrote:
On 1Aug2023, Jean Dubois wrote:
"[Chad's] been 5150'd multiple times"
"[Chad] has been involuntarily committed to psychiatric confinement"
A close friend of Lee Bryant said these things. He is not known to lie.
Are they true? What's the story behind this?
John Henry DeJong is known to lie,
John Henry DeJong should be careful about the lies he tells because of
sections 750.370& 750.371 in the Michigan Compiled Laws.
Say what you will about John, it remains fact that Chad is a very broken
boy who has been institutionalised on multiple occasions.
The time he sacked for failing to sit a psychiatric evaluation is particularly amusing, as was his imaginary lawsuit against said former employer.
Taro Tsujimoto <tsuj...@sabres.com> wrote:
On 1Aug2023, Jean Dubois wrote:
"[Chad's] been 5150'd multiple times"
"[Chad] has been involuntarily committed to psychiatric confinement"
A close friend of Lee Bryant said these things. He is not known to lie. >>
Are they true? What's the story behind this?
John Henry DeJong is known to lie,
John Henry DeJong should be careful about the lies he tells because of sections 750.370& 750.371 in the Michigan Compiled Laws.
Say what you will about John, it remains fact that Chad is a very broken
boy who has been institutionalised on multiple occasions.
The time he sacked for failing to sit a psychiatric evaluation is particularly amusing, as was his imaginary lawsuit against said former employer.
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 5:23:55 PM UTC-4, ]v[etaphoid wrote:
Taro Tsujimoto <tsuj...@sabres.com> wrote:
On 1Aug2023, Jean Dubois wrote:Say what you will about John, it remains fact that Chad is a very broken
"[Chad's] been 5150'd multiple times"
"[Chad] has been involuntarily committed to psychiatric confinement"
A close friend of Lee Bryant said these things. He is not known to lie. >>>>
Are they true? What's the story behind this?
John Henry DeJong is known to lie,
John Henry DeJong should be careful about the lies he tells because of
sections 750.370& 750.371 in the Michigan Compiled Laws.
boy who has been institutionalised on multiple occasions.
The time he sacked for failing to sit a psychiatric evaluation is
particularly amusing, as was his imaginary lawsuit against said former
employer.
It made me - and I am sure others - wonder what in the hell Chadlee Anvil Bryant had gotten "up to" at the time to make his employer realize
Chadlee Anvil Bryant was a complete sociopath and nut case to go so far
as to actually "encourage" the evaluation. Like, just how screwy, creepy
or messed up was his behavior that made his employer wonder if they had a potential mass shooter on the payroll?
Chad?s flailing obsession
In article <uag3br$oflf$1@dont-email.me>, meta@lowincomegenius.com says...
Chad?s flailing obsessionyou really should have that checked out, you rarely post
without mentioning that fat fucking loser dead beat daddy
https://imgur.com/a/J5ylY0S
% <peescent@qmail.net> wrote:
In article <uag3br$oflf$1@dont-email.me>, meta@lowincomegenius.com
says...
Chad?s flailing obsessionyou really should have that checked out, you rarely post
without mentioning that fat fucking loser dead beat daddy
https://imgur.com/a/J5ylY0S
Thank you.
I like to think that myself and the Zimmerman army have had a profound
impact on our trainable friend over the years.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in ]news:ual92j$1n90v$1@dont-email.me:
% <peescent@qmail.net> wrote:
In article <uag3br$oflf$1@dont-email.me>, meta@lowincomegenius.com
says...
Chad?s flailing obsessionyou really should have that checked out, you rarely post
without mentioning that fat fucking loser dead beat daddy
https://imgur.com/a/J5ylY0S
Thank you.
I like to think that myself and the Zimmerman army have had a profound
impact on our trainable friend over the years.
The Zimmermen are the greatest force for good that RSPW has ever seen.
Alex Cain and his henchpeople deserve a mention too.
If John Henry decides to take action and force Google's hand with regard
to Google Groups' feed of RSPW, I hope you realize that your playground
is at risk. The only strictly on-charter discussion in this group
emanates from Terrence Clay, a Google Groups user. Jason Todd generates a
lot of the remaining traffic, is a longtime RSPWer, and occasionally
makes reference to pro-wrestling - and he's a Google Groups user, too.
Once these folks have their access cut off, and there's no longer any on- charter discussion happening here, John Henry might just post an ad hoc
RFD for the group's removal to news.announce.newgroups and news.groups.proposals. No on-charter traffic is enough of a reason, and Google banning the group will be prima facie evidence of abuse,
illegality, and unacceptable behavior.
Seems like an easy road for John Henry to shut this cesspool down for
good and finally remove the stench from this dump from his person for
good.
If I were you, I'd tread lightly and choose your future words very
carefully. It would be a real shame if John Henry had to exercise his towering intellect, vast knowledge, exceptional charisma, and
preternatural tenacity to shut down your favorite playground.
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 17:19:01 -0600, Taro Tsujimoto wrote:
On 29Jul2023, Liz Bentley wrote (in article
<ua3bh4$2l9ed$1@dont-email.me>):
Re: Google search results for your name
You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not
indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as
containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a
"Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups.
alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others have
been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly, these
groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search engine.
In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging threads >>> for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might be able to
get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so remove the
problematic posts from Google search results for your name.
A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or violent
content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated goods and
services at the group, conversation, or message level" found in the
group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin this group and
solve at least one of your problems. A solid effort would need to
involve reporting individual messages as well as
threads/"conversations". As well, for illegal content you'd want to
report messages through the troubleshooting interface at
https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more
products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
"http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern Google’s
Terms of Service or content and product policies". Google encourages
reporting the same content using both paths, "but you must file each
report separately".
Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here, which
may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual property
rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you believe
violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review the material >>> and consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to it" - https://
support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could
support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your
complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went all-in
reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a
violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to take
action.
And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
flags.
You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
saved.
This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups. You can
do it.
Why are you using Ubuntu 18.04, John Henry?
I seem to recall some lowlifes here bandying about the notions that John Henry had no idea how to use Linux, refused to learn, was "too good" for Linux, and so on. There was also an assertion that John Henry only had
one PC which he'd removed from a dumpster. The pond scum here also
ridiculed John Henry for being stuck on Windows 10 and not being able to upgrade to Windows 11 as he'd expressed a desire to. So which is it? Is
John Henry now capable of using Linux just because it's a convenient
avenue of attack? He's now using Linux instead of Windows just because
it's a handy way to bash him? He has multiple boxes instead of only the dumpster rescue just because that's a good way to tear him down right now regardless of what's been claimed before and in spite of the fact that it makes no sense?
John Henry went out of his way to conceal your name when issuing direct criticism of you. Where is your gratitude for his mercy? Where is your acknowledgment of wrongdoing? Where is your public apology? Why do you continue to provoke, insult, and manipulate instead of helping all of us
to understand your malicious actions over the past two decades? You
haven't even made an attempt to correct the record; it's just been radio silence followed by sniping. Have you no honor? Have you no decency?
If John Henry decides to take action and force Google's hand with regard
to Google Groups' feed of RSPW, I hope you realize that your playground
is at risk. The only strictly on-charter discussion in this group
emanates from Terrence Clay, a Google Groups user. Jason Todd generates a
lot of the remaining traffic, is a longtime RSPWer, and occasionally
makes reference to pro-wrestling - and he's a Google Groups user, too.
Once these folks have their access cut off, and there's no longer any on- charter discussion happening here, John Henry might just post an ad hoc
RFD for the group's removal to news.announce.newgroups and news.groups.proposals. No on-charter traffic is enough of a reason, and Google banning the group will be prima facie evidence of abuse,
illegality, and unacceptable behavior.
Seems like an easy road for John Henry to shut this cesspool down for
good and finally remove the stench from this dump from his person for
good.
If I were you, I'd tread lightly and choose your future words very
carefully. It would be a real shame if John Henry had to exercise his towering intellect, vast knowledge, exceptional charisma, and
preternatural tenacity to shut down your favorite playground.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 108:19:06 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,598 |