Taro Tsujimoto graced us with:
Kara Mac <karamcnamara0630@gmail.com> wrote:
Liz Bentley is fixing to announce she works for YOU as a news
reporter. Pay up!!!
Dear Liz- everyone has the same access to news. Get a job, Liz,
get a job.
Liz Bentley is a John Henry DeJong sock.
There's no evidence of that. What's crazy is that John himself JUST
posted here and explained in great detail that he does not roll
sockpuppets or pretend to be other people and that his defining feature
as a contributor across all forums is the fact that for better or worse
he stands behind what he says with his actual identity. He's not
perfect, and he's done things and made decisions in the past that
inhindsight were regrettable, but he doesn't hide from those things and
in fact he seems to have used them as opportunities to learn, to
evolve, and to teach others who may encounter similar things in their
lives so that maybe they might have access to information about the
world, how it works, and how people with certain personality types tend
to approach it, and make better decisions in those circumstances than
he did. When John posts, you'll know it; the "From:" field in his
headers will read "John Henry" or some clear variation thereof, not
"Chuckles McGee" or "Liz Bentley" or any other fiction.
I suggest that anyone who has a bone to pick with John head over
to his public Facebook page and express themselves. If you have
anything to say in good faith, and aren't just a useless obnoxious
troll with deep-seated narcissism and self-esteem issues or a victim of somesuch manipulated into dogpiling the guy for no sensible,
rational,or defensible reason, he'll hear what you have to say and
respond in kind. Otherwise - by posting here - you're only providing
evidence concretizing every single thing he's uttered in his analyses
about your ilk. He's probably grateful for that in a small way, seeing
as how it not only proves him correct but also offers fodder for future
case studies which could fuel his work for a very long time.
Instead of trying (and failing) to be Billy Badass cyberbullies on
archaic social media, perhaps you could take a step back and actually
consider John's ideas and writings without bias to see if there's any
merit there - and whether or not some of the concepts he's floating
apply to you? Introspection is probably far beyond most of you at this
point, but if you ever wanted to be honest with yourselves for even one
second, and you could muster the smallest amount of courage, you'd at
least attempt to engage with John and his ideas fairly.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)