x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
On 31 May 2023, Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> posted some news:u58r74$2i3qj$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried
chicken and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a
basketball for an hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then
later in the afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh,
good? Black power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9253923/Race-faker-Rachel-Doleza l-says-job-six-years-pretending-black.html
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried
chicken and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a
basketball for an hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then
later in the afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh,
good? Black power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried
chicken and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a
basketball for an hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then
later in the afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh,
good? Black power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Like_Me
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black
power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken >>> and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an >>> hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black
power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous “you too” fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an
action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For
instance:
“You’re just being randomly abusive.”
“So? You’ve been abusive too.”
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum
ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/
#tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an
hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black
power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous “you too” fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For instance:
“You’re just being randomly abusive.”
“So? You’ve been abusive too.”
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum
ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/ #tuquoque
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken >>> and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an >>> hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black
power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous ?you too? fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an
action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For
instance:
?You?re just being randomly abusive.?
?So? You?ve been abusive too.?
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum >> ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/
#tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
it's not up your ass or you'd feel it
In article <zWudnUPoceW2UOH5...@giganews.com>, pursent100Voice of experience.
@gmail.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an
hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black
power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous ?you too? fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an
action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For
instance:
?You?re just being randomly abusive.?
?So? You?ve been abusive too.?
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum
ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/
#tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
it's not up your ass or you'd feel itespecially if it was rolling dice
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken >> and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an >> hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black
power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous ?you too? fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an
action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For instance:
?You?re just being randomly abusive.?
?So? You?ve been abusive too.?
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum
ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/ #tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
On Sunday, June 4, 2023 at 5:01:05PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <zWudnUPoceW2UOH5...@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an
hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black >>> power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous ?you too? fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an >> action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For
instance:
?You?re just being randomly abusive.?
?So? You?ve been abusive too.?
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum
ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/ >> #tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
Voice of experience.it's not up your ass or you'd feel itespecially if it was rolling dice
In article <zWudnUPoceW2UOH5nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 @gmail.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an
hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black
power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous ?you too? fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an
action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For
instance:
?You?re just being randomly abusive.?
?So? You?ve been abusive too.?
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum >> ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/
#tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
it's not up your ass or you'd feel it
especially if it was rolling dice
In article <f493818a-09ab-45c6...@googlegroups.com>,I took a week off. Unlike you, I have a life outside of this place.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, June 4, 2023 at 5:01:05 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <zWudnUPoceW2UOH5...@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an
hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the >>> afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black >>> power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous ?you too? fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an
action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For
instance:
?You?re just being randomly abusive.?
?So? You?ve been abusive too.?
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum
ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/
#tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's
over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
I see you ran away from all the other threads.Voice of experience.it's not up your ass or you'd feel itespecially if it was rolling dice
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 12:29:28AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f493818a-09ab-45c6...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, June 4, 2023 at 5:01:05 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <zWudnUPoceW2UOH5...@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an
hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the >>> afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black >>> power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous ?you too? fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an
action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For >> instance:
?You?re just being randomly abusive.?
?So? You?ve been abusive too.?
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum
ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/
#tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's
over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
I took a week off. Unlike you, I have a life outside of this place.I see you ran away from all the other threads.Voice of experience.it's not up your ass or you'd feel itespecially if it was rolling dice
In article <266cd3ca-08bf-4e64...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 12:29:28 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f493818a-09ab-45c6...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, June 4, 2023 at 5:01:05 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <zWudnUPoceW2UOH5...@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an
hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black
power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous ?you too? fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an
action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For
instance:
?You?re just being randomly abusive.?
?So? You?ve been abusive too.?
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum
ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/
#tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's
over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
You did like you always do. You posted a bunch of shit that shot you inI took a week off. Unlike you, I have a life outside of this place.I see you ran away from all the other threads.Voice of experience.it's not up your ass or you'd feel itespecially if it was rolling dice
the foot so you ran away hoping it would go away.
On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 10:08:47AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <266cd3ca-08bf-4e64...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 12:29:28 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <f493818a-09ab-45c6...@googlegroups.com>, davidbr...@gmail.com says...
On Sunday, June 4, 2023 at 5:01:05 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <zWudnUPoceW2UOH5...@giganews.com>, pursent100 @gmail.com says...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 6/3/2023 10:59 PM, The Ref wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:58 -0700, Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Day 1 of being a black man, and I started my day by eating fried chicken
and drinking grape soda, later I practiced dribbling a basketball for an
hour, then I smoked some serious chronic, and then later in the
afternoon I held up a liquor store. How'd I do bruh, good? Black
power!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FttyV9IEzlc
Yellow card!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tu quoque
This is the famous ?you too? fallacy. It occurs if you argue that an
action is acceptable because your opponent has performed it. For
instance:
?You?re just being randomly abusive.?
?So? You?ve been abusive too.?
This is a personal attack, and is therefore a special case of Argumentum
ad Hominem.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/
#tuquoque
uh huh
So where is the commentary and condemnation from the left for Dylan's
over-the-top womanface and gender appropriation?
You did like you always do. You posted a bunch of shit that shot you inI took a week off. Unlike you, I have a life outside of this place.I see you ran away from all the other threads.Voice of experience.it's not up your ass or you'd feel itespecially if it was rolling dice
the foot so you ran away hoping it would go away.
"You" and "Posted"
Those are the only words in your above bleatings that are true. Everything else is a lie.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 123:45:35 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,705 |