Well guess what?!?!?would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one, you
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block theresults at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the election
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, hewanted to be reelected president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned the election at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa thisweek.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, youunderstand that, meaning he had the right to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again, Trumpis just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
So what is Trump saying?were the causes of the day?s violence.
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining power ?
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
Well guess what?!?!?you would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn’t have had ‘Jan. 6’ as we call it.”
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn’t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,” Trump said. “Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one,
You’ll recall that this was Trump’s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block theresults at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the election results were finalized during
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump’s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6,he wanted to be reelected president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn’t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned theelection at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
“They all said he didn’t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,” Trump insisted. “And then the day after he did it, they said, ‘Now we’re going to change it so he doesn’t do it.’Meaning, you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.”
This is like saying that if there’s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again,Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let’s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that’s beside the immediate point.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump’s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
So what is Trump saying?
He’s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.power — were the causes of the day’s violence.
He’s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 — convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a “wild” protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining
He’s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn’t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn’t.
He’s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren’t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground wrote:
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn’t have had a >> problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,”
Trump said. “Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona,
the states, I believe, number one, you would have had a different
outcome. But I also believe you wouldn’t have had ‘Jan. 6’ as we call it.”
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that
not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
You’ll recall that this was Trump’s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His
efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to
block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown
out; then his attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send
invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option
of recognizing those slates when the election results were finalized
during the electoral college vote count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got
Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid
results and then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the
real electors for the fake ones.
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump’s entire presidency to
that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the
often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried
to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also
had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
election at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to
formalize what the vice president is and isn’t allowed to do proves that >> Pence could have simply overturned the
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat.
Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to
the end, he gets to be President again.
“They all said he didn’t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor >> belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,” Trump insisted. “And then >> the day after he did it, they said, ‘Now we’re going to change it so he >> doesn’t do it.’ Meaning, you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.”
*blink*
This is like saying that if there’s no explicit prohibition against
pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right
to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme
Court would go along. But, again, Trump is just using the pitch
rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of
sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let’s go back to that first quote, in which he says
that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted
the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been
jubilation among Trump’s supporters who had been told over and over that >> Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain
power, and had Pence done what Trump said he should do, Trump would have
been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been
a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that’s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's
2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something. Hopefully January 6th.
He’s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated
because they believed the election should have been overturned and that
Pence had the power to overturn it.
He’s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. >> 6 — convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to
Washington with the promise of a “wild” protest and point them at Pence >> as the last resort for retaining power — were the causes of the day’s violence.
He’s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn’t do the thing
Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn’t.
He’s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results
overturned and became enraged when they weren’t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one, you
results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the electionYou?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block the
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the real electorsfor the fake ones.
he wanted to be reelected president.This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6,
week.Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned the election at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this
understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.??They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you
Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again,
Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
were the causes of the day?s violence.So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining power ?
.He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground wrote:would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one, you
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the electionYou?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block the
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
he wanted to be reelected president.This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6,
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned theelection at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat.
Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to the end, he gets to be President again.
understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.??They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you
*blink*
Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again,
Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something. Hopefully January 6th.
were the causes of the day?s violence.He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining power ?
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 8:45:23 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at the
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have had
a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,?
Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona,
the states, I believe, number one, you would have had a different
outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.? >>>
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His
efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to
block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown
out; then his attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send
invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the
option of recognizing those slates when the election
Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate to agree
to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both publicly and
privately to reject the real electors for the fake ones.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to
that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the
often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump
tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to
formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves
that Pence could have simply overturned the election at the Capitol
that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human
conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted.
?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to
change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you understand that, meaning
he had the right to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against
pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right
to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme
Court would go along. But, again, Trump is just using the pitch
rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot
of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he says
that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted
the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have
been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and
over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see
Trump retain power, and had Pence done what Trump said he should do,
Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would
have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated
because they believed the election should have been overturned and that
Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before
Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to
Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at Pence
as the last resort for retaining power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing
Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results
overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.OF COURSE
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
Could it be because your guy is a disaster?
No, it's because the sexual-assaulting, coup-inciting, dumbass narcissist
is running for president again.
In article <49c63ece-0e13-4ccd-9728-3f55ec8e977an@googlegroups.com>, davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 8:45:23PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t
have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him
for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one, you would
have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t
have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached.
His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his
efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal
challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block the
results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup
plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of
electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of
recognizing those slates when the election
the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate
to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both
publicly and privately to reject the real electors for the fake
ones.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency
to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation
for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the
presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he
wanted to be reelected president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to
formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do
proves that Pence could have simply overturned the election at
the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this
week.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human
conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump
insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now
we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you
understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition
against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you
have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it
and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again, Trump is
just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved
effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he
says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would
have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would
have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told
over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They
wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what Trump
said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted
coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump
unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was
infuriated because they believed the election should have been
overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks
before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen,
lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and
point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining power ? were
the causes of the day?s violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the
thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results
overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan
-6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.OF COURSE
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
Could it be because your guy is a disaster?
No, it's because the sexual-assaulting, coup-inciting, dumbass
narcissist is running for president again.
Any word on Joe?
In article <22e28991-54f0-48bd...@googlegroups.com>,you would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
madeforz...@yahoo.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground wrote:
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one,
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the electionYou?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block the
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the real electorsfor the fake ones.
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
he wanted to be reelected president.This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6,
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned theelection at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat.
Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to the end, he gets to be President again.
understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.??They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you
*blink*
Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again,
Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something. Hopefully January 6th.YAWN
power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
Family Guy <madeforz...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the
High Ground wrote:
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn’t have had a
problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,”
Trump said. “Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, >> the states, I believe, number one, you would have had a different
outcome. But I also believe you wouldn’t have had ‘Jan. 6’ as we call it.”
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
You’ll recall that this was Trump’s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His >> efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to
block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown >> out; then his attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send
invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option >> of recognizing those slates when the election results were finalized
during the electoral college vote count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got >> Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid
results and then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the >> real electors for the fake ones.
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump’s entire presidency to
that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the
often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried >> to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
election at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to
formalize what the vice president is and isn’t allowed to do proves that
Pence could have simply overturned the
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat.
Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to the end, he gets to be President again.
“They all said he didn’t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor
belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,” Trump insisted. “And then
the day after he did it, they said, ‘Now we’re going to change it so he
doesn’t do it.’ Meaning, you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.”
*blink*
This is like saying that if there’s no explicit prohibition against
pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right >> to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme >> Court would go along. But, again, Trump is just using the pitch
rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of >> sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let’s go back to that first quote, in which he says >> that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted
the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been >> jubilation among Trump’s supporters who had been told over and over that
Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain
power, and had Pence done what Trump said he should do, Trump would have >> been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been >> a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that’s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something. Hopefully January 6th.
He’s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated
because they believed the election should have been overturned and that >> Pence had the power to overturn it.
He’s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan.
6 — convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to
Washington with the promise of a “wild” protest and point them at Pence
as the last resort for retaining power — were the causes of the day’s violence.
He’s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn’t do the thing >> Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn’t.
He’s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results
overturned and became enraged when they weren’t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
I think the Donald would be very sad if he ever found out about the mean things you’ve been saying about him.
He’d be entitled to expect more sympathy from a fellow member of the Fucked
Up Hair Club for Men…
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 3:59:04 PM UTC-4, ]v[etaphoid wrote:
Family Guy <madeforz...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the >>> High Ground wrote:I think the Donald would be very sad if he ever found out about the mean
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn’t have had a >>>> problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,”
Trump said. “Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, >>>> the states, I believe, number one, you would have had a different
outcome. But I also believe you wouldn’t have had ‘Jan. 6’ as we call it.”
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that >>> not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
You’ll recall that this was Trump’s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His >>>> efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to
block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown >>>> out; then his attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send >>>> invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option >>>> of recognizing those slates when the election results were finalized
during the electoral college vote count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got >>>> Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid
results and then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the >>>> real electors for the fake ones.
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise >>> coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic,
Caesar-in-training.
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump’s entire presidency to >>>> that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the >>>> often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried >>>> to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president. >>>
had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably
thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
election at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to
formalize what the vice president is and isn’t allowed to do proves that >>>> Pence could have simply overturned the
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat.
Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to >>> the end, he gets to be President again.
“They all said he didn’t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor
belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,” Trump insisted. “And then
the day after he did it, they said, ‘Now we’re going to change it so he
doesn’t do it.’ Meaning, you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.”
*blink*
This is like saying that if there’s no explicit prohibition against
pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right >>>> to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme >>>> Court would go along. But, again, Trump is just using the pitch
rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of >>>> sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let’s go back to that first quote, in which he says >>>> that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted
the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been >>>> jubilation among Trump’s supporters who had been told over and over that >>>> Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain >>>> power, and had Pence done what Trump said he should do, Trump would have >>>> been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been >>>> a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that’s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's
2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something.
Hopefully January 6th.
He’s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated >>>> because they believed the election should have been overturned and that >>>> Pence had the power to overturn it.
He’s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. >>>> 6 — convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to
Washington with the promise of a “wild” protest and point them at Pence
as the last resort for retaining power — were the causes of the day’s violence.
He’s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn’t do the thing >>>> Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn’t.
He’s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results
overturned and became enraged when they weren’t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
things you’ve been saying about him.
I think the Donald has an ego so large and is so narcissistic that he literally doesn't give a shit about what anything negative is said about him.
He’d be entitled to expect more sympathy from a fellow member of the Fucked
Up Hair Club for Men…
* one star troll. You've done better.
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in news:MPG.3e7bd921b745541098baaf@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <49c63ece-0e13-4ccd-9728-3f55ec8e977an@googlegroups.com>, davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 8:45:23PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t
have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him
for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one, you would
have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t
have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached.
His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his
efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal
challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block the
results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup
plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of
electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of
recognizing those slates when the election
the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate
to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both
publicly and privately to reject the real electors for the fake
ones.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency
to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation
for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the
presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he
wanted to be reelected president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to
formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do
proves that Pence could have simply overturned the election at
the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this
week.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human
conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump
insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now
we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you
understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition
against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you
have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it
and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again, Trump is
just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved
effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he
says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would
have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would
have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told
over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They
wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what Trump
said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted
coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump
unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was
infuriated because they believed the election should have been
overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks
before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen,
lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and
point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining power ? were
the causes of the day?s violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the
thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results
overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan
-6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.OF COURSE
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
Could it be because your guy is a disaster?
No, it's because the sexual-assaulting, coup-inciting, dumbass
narcissist is running for president again.
Any word on Joe?
Any word on your DD214, liar?
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 4:31:18PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:you would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
In article <22e28991-54f0-48bd...@googlegroups.com>,
madeforz...@yahoo.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground wrote:
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one,
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when theYou?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block the
for the fake ones.results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the real electors
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
6, he wanted to be reelected president.This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan.
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned theelection at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat. Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to the end, he gets to be President again.
understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.??They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you
*blink*
Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again,
what Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something. Hopefully January 6th.YAWN
So which window did you break on January 6th?
power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground wrote:you would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn’t have had ‘Jan. 6’ as we call it.”
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn’t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,” Trump said. “Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one,
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the election results were finalized during
You’ll recall that this was Trump’s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block the
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.he wanted to be reelected president.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump’s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6,
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.Meaning, you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.”
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn’t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned theelection at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat.
Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to the end, he gets to be President again.
“They all said he didn’t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,” Trump insisted. “And then the day after he did it, they said, ‘Now we’re going to change it so he doesn’t do it.’
*blink*Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.
This is like saying that if there’s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again,
Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that’s beside the immediate point.With that in mind, let’s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump’s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
retaining power — were the causes of the day’s violence.So what is Trump saying?That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something. Hopefully January 6th.
He’s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He’s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 — convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a “wild” protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for
He’s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn’t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn’t.
He’s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren’t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 1:43:00PM UTC-5, Family Guy wrote:you would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground wrote:
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one,
results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the electionThat says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block the
he wanted to be reelected president.So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6,
understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.?Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned theelection at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat.
Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to the end, he gets to be President again.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you
Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.*blink*
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again,
Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.So what is Trump saying?That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something. Hopefully January 6th.
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
Georgia special grand jury heard a recorded call in which Trump pressured the state's House Speaker to convene a session to overturn the 2020 vote: report
https://www.businessinsider.com/georgia-grand-jury-recorded-call-trump-house-speaker-david-ralston-2023-3
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 1:43:00 PM UTC-5, Family Guy wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi
Has the High Ground wrote:
Well guess what?!?!? No, really GUESS!! YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn’t
have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him
for Jan. 6,” Trump said. “Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one, you would
have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn’t
have had ‘Jan. 6’ as we call it.”
ways that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No
You’ll recall that this was Trump’s demand as Jan. 6 approached.
His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his
efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal
challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block the
results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup
plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of
electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of
recognizing those slates when the election results were finalized
during the electoral college vote count at the Capitol on Jan. 6.
He got Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge
the valid results and then pressed Pence both publicly and
privately to reject the real electors for the fake ones.
surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional,
narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump’s entire presidency
to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation
for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the
presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he
wanted to be reelected president.
also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he
probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
election at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to
formalize what the vice president is and isn’t allowed to do
proves that Pence could have simply overturned the
Iowa this week. The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a
Denny's placemat. Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if
he can find a way to to the end, he gets to be President again.
*blink*
“They all said he didn’t have any rights at all, he was a human
conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,” Trump
insisted. “And then the day after he did it, they said, ‘Now
we’re going to change it so he doesn’t do it.’ Meaning, you
understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.”
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if
This is like saying that if there’s no explicit prohibition
against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you
have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it
and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again, Trump is
just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved
effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let’s go back to that first quote, in which he
says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would
have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would
have been jubilation among Trump’s supporters who had been told
over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They
wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what Trump
said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted
coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump
unrest, but that’s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
it's 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ...
something. Hopefully January 6th.
He’s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was
infuriated because they believed the election should have been
overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He’s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks
before Jan. 6 — convince his supporters the election was stolen,
lure them to Washington with the promise of a “wild” protest and
point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining power — were
the causes of the day’s violence.
He’s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn’t do the
thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn’t.
He’s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results
overturned and became enraged when they weren’t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
Georgia special grand jury heard a recorded call in which Trump
pressured the state's House Speaker to convene a session to overturn
the 2020 vote: report
https://www.businessinsider.com/georgia-grand-jury-recorded-call-trump-house-speaker-david-ralston-2023-3
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Any word on Joe?
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Any word on Joe?
He's in California, meeting with families and survivors of the
Monterey Park massacre.
Next?
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the Oval
Office.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the Oval
Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the nineties…
Freezer wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Any word on Joe?
He's in California, meeting with families and survivors of the
Monterey Park massacre.
Next?
stop e-mailing me
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the Oval
Office.
In article <cOWcnVWvrqgFaY75nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100 @gmail.com says...
Freezer wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.stop e-mailing me
Any word on Joe?
He's in California, meeting with families and survivors of the
Monterey Park massacre.
Next?
Is he doing that again?
]v [etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote:
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote:
In article <cOWcnVWvrqgFaY75nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
Freezer wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.stop e-mailing me
Any word on Joe?
He's in California, meeting with families and survivors of the
Monterey Park massacre.
Next?
Is he doing that again?
Technology, like politics, must be so confusing for these anti-social luddites?
he e-mails and ask if i'll make skeeter lay off him
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote:
In article <cOWcnVWvrqgFaY75nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
Freezer wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.stop e-mailing me
Any word on Joe?
He's in California, meeting with families and survivors of the
Monterey Park massacre.
Next?
Is he doing that again?
Technology, like politics, must be so confusing for these anti-social luddites…
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 4:31:18 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <22e28991-54f0-48bd...@googlegroups.com>,he High Ground wrote:
madeforz...@yahoo.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi
Has t
d a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan.Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t
have ha
6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia,
Arizona, the states, I believe, number one, you would have had a
different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6?
as we call it.?
at not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many
ways th
efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached.
His
block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were
thrown out; then his attempts to block the results at the Supreme
Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump
supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that
Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the election
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at theitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the real electors for the fake ones.
Cap
e coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional,
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No
surpris
narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency
to
tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.
had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He
also
probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
lize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves that
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to
forma
Pence could have simply overturned the
is week.election at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to
Iowa th
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's
placemat.
to the end, he gets to be President again.Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way
to
yor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human
conve
then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to change it
so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you understand that, meaning he had the
right to do it.?
ouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right
*blink*
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition
against p
to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the
Supreme Court would go along. But, again, Trump is just using the
pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing
a lot of sales with his supporters.
s that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he
say
averted the riot by Trump supporters.
een jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would
have b
over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see
Trump retain power, and had Pence done what Trump said he should do,
Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would
have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.
030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something.
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if
it's 2
Hopefully January 6th.
YAWN
So which window did you break on January 6th?
In article <eIsQL.94963$alff.51280@fx07.ams1>, doc@reefer.net says...
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e7bd921b745541098baaf@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article
<49c63ece-0e13-4ccd-9728-3f55ec8e977an@googlegroups.com>,
davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 8:45:23PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t
have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame
him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to
Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number
one, you would have had a different outcome. But I also
believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6
approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled
repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden
failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his
attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters
to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that
Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the
election
at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and
Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed
Pence both publicly and privately to reject the real electors
for the fake ones.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire
presidency to that point. With no background in politics and
no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed
around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And
on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push
to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to
do proves that Pence could have simply overturned the election
at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa
this week.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a
human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,?
Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said,
?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning,
you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition
against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer,
you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to
try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But,
again, Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his
behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales
with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which
he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states
would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would
have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been
told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that.
They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his
attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of
anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was
infuriated because they believed the election should have been
overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks
before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was
stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild?
protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for
retaining power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the
thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president
couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election
results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-
jan -6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.OF COURSE
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
Could it be because your guy is a disaster?
No, it's because the sexual-assaulting, coup-inciting, dumbass
narcissist is running for president again.
Any word on Joe?
Any word on your DD214, liar?
I kicked Chad Bryant's ass out of here.
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in news:MPG.3e7cae51e41fbef98bad5@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <eIsQL.94963$alff.51280@fx07.ams1>, doc@reefer.net says...
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e7bd921b745541098baaf@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article
<49c63ece-0e13-4ccd-9728-3f55ec8e977an@googlegroups.com>,
davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 8:45:23PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t
have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame
him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to
Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number
one, you would have had a different outcome. But I also
believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6
approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled
repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden
failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his
attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters
to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that
Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the
election
at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and
Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed
Pence both publicly and privately to reject the real electors
for the fake ones.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire
presidency to that point. With no background in politics and
no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed
around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And
on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push
to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to
do proves that Pence could have simply overturned the election
at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa
this week.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a
human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,?
Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said,
?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning,
you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition
against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer,
you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to
try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But,
again, Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his
behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales
with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which
he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states
would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would
have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been
told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that.
They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his
attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of
anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was
infuriated because they believed the election should have been
overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks
before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was
stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild?
protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for
retaining power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the
thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president
couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election
results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-
jan -6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.OF COURSE
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
Could it be because your guy is a disaster?
No, it's because the sexual-assaulting, coup-inciting, dumbass
narcissist is running for president again.
Any word on Joe?
Any word on your DD214, liar?
I kicked Chad Bryant's ass out of here.
No you didn't, liar.
In article <JO6RL.58335$eD%3.29290@fx14.ams1>, doc@reefer.net says...
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFC9F2111DF05freezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the Oval
Office.
Skeeter got a hand job at an AA meeting.
Uh oh, someones sock is showing.
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the Oval
Office.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in >]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
In article <XnsAFC9F26651986freezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247>, freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Any word on Joe?
He's in California, meeting with families and survivors of the
Monterey Park massacre.
Next?
Publicity stunt. He's a fucking joke. Spy balloon? No big deal.
Knock our drone out of the sky? No big deal.
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in news:MPG.3e7cae51e41fbef98bad5@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <eIsQL.94963$alff.51280@fx07.ams1>, doc@reefer.net says...
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e7bd921b745541098baaf@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article
<49c63ece-0e13-4ccd-9728-3f55ec8e977an@googlegroups.com>,
davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 8:45:23燩M UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t
have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame
him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to
Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number
one, you would have had a different outcome. But I also
believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6
approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled
repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden
failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his
attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters
to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that
Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the
election
at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and
Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed
Pence both publicly and privately to reject the real electors
for the fake ones.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire
presidency to that point. With no background in politics and
no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed
around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And
on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push
to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to
do proves that Pence could have simply overturned the election
at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa
this week.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a
human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,?
Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said,
?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning,
you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition
against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer,
you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to
try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But,
again, Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his
behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales
with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which
he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states
would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would
have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been
told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that.
They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done what
Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his
attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of
anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was
infuriated because they believed the election should have been
overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks
before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was
stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild?
protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for
retaining power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the
thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president
couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election
results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-
jan -6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.OF COURSE
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
Could it be because your guy is a disaster?
No, it's because the sexual-assaulting, coup-inciting, dumbass
narcissist is running for president again.
Any word on Joe?
Any word on your DD214, liar?
I kicked Chad Bryant's ass out of here.
No you didn't, liar.
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
In article <XnsAFC9F26651986freezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247>, freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Any word on Joe?
He's in California, meeting with families and survivors of the
Monterey Park massacre.
Next?
Publicity stunt. He's a fucking joke. Spy balloon? No big deal.
What would you have him do? Declare war with China?
Knock our drone out of the sky? No big deal.
You do know that provoking Biden into doing something major is just
what Russia wants, right?
RIGHT?
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in >]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven?t had a blowjob since the
nineties?
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in >>]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 7:40:55 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <beecfbf1-013d-48d9...@googlegroups.com>,
madeforz...@yahoo.com says...
election
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 4:31:18 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <22e28991-54f0-48bd...@googlegroups.com>,
madeforz...@yahoo.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has >>>>> the High Ground wrote:
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have >>>>>> had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for
Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one, you would have >>>>>> had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had
?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways >>>>> that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His >>>>>> efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts >>>>>> to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were >>>>>> thrown out; then his attempts to block the results at the Supreme
Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump
supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that >>>>>> Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when the
Double yawn. No wonder you're unemployed.results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at the
Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate to agree >>>> to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both publicly
and privately to reject the real electors for the fake ones.
YAWN
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No
surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional,
narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to >>>>>> that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for >>>>>> the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency,
Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He
also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he
probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
election at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to
formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves >>>>>> that Pence could have simply overturned the
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat. >>>>> Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way
to to the end, he gets to be President again.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human
conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump
insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re >>>>>> going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning, you understand
that, meaning he had the right to do it.?
*blink*
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against >>>>>> pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the
right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if
the Supreme Court would go along. But, again, Trump is just using the pitch
rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a
lot of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he
says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have >>>>>> averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have >>>>>> been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and >>>>>> over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see >>>>>> Trump retain power, and had Pence done what Trump said he should do, >>>>>> Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there
would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s
beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's >>>>> 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something.
Hopefully January 6th.
So which window did you break on January 6th?
I've been employed for a long time now, Trumpette. You should stop
getting your "information" from Chadlee.
He's been out of the game for years when it comes to stalking skills.
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated >>>>>> because they believed the election should have been overturned and >>>>>> that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before >>>>>> Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them >>>>>> to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at >>>>>> Pence as the last resort for retaining power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing >>>>>> Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results
overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
In article <beecfbf1-013d-48d9...@googlegroups.com>,you would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
madeforz...@yahoo.com says...
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 4:31:18 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <22e28991-54f0-48bd...@googlegroups.com>, madeforz...@yahoo.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground wrote:
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number one,
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
the results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when theYou?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block
electionelectors for the fake ones.
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the real
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned theelection at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat. Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to the end, he gets to be President again.
you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.??They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning,
*blink*
Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But, again,
what Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something. Hopefully January 6th.YAWN
So which window did you break on January 6th?Double yawn. No wonder you're unemployed.
power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for retaining
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
Freezer <free...@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in news:XnsAFC9F2111DF05f...@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the Oval
Office.
Skeeter got a hand job at an AA meeting.
On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 7:35:09 PM UTC-4, Larry Sportello wrote:
Freezer <free...@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFC9F2111DF05f...@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.Skeeter got a hand job at an AA meeting.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the Oval
Office.
That wasn't an AA meeting. It was the mens room at a crowded Arby's.
In article <yM6RL.58333$eD%3.35535@fx14.ams1>, doc@reefer.net says...
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e7cae51e41fbef98bad5@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <eIsQL.94963$alff.51280@fx07.ams1>, doc@reefer.net
says...
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e7bd921b745541098baaf@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article
<49c63ece-0e13-4ccd-9728-3f55ec8e977an@googlegroups.com>,
davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 8:45:23PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
results were finalized during the electoral college vote
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they
wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways
you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent
them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I
believe, number one, you would have had a different
outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6?
as we call it.?
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6
approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled
repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden
failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his
attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump
supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington
so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates
when the election
count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the
House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and
then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the
real electors for the fake ones.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire
presidency to that point. With no background in politics
and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails
constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what
he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected
president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6
push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t
allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply
overturned the election at the Capitol that day. He said as
much on the way to Iowa this week.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a
human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was
fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it,
they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do
it.? Meaning, you understand that, meaning he had the right
to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition
against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center
mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that
day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go
along. But, again, Trump is just using the pitch
rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in
closing a lot of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in
which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to
states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there
would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had
been told over and over that Pence could and might do
exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and
had Pence done what Trump said he should do, Trump would
have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would
have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s
beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was
infuriated because they believed the election should have
been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn
it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the
weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election
was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a
?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort
for retaining power ? were the causes of the day?s
violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do
the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president
couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election
results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pen
ce- jan -6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.OF COURSE
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
Could it be because your guy is a disaster?
No, it's because the sexual-assaulting, coup-inciting, dumbass
narcissist is running for president again.
Any word on Joe?
Any word on your DD214, liar?
I kicked Chad Bryant's ass out of here.
No you didn't, liar.
Oh yea, sent him screaming.
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in news:MPG.3e7eac7f31b9986298bba1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <yM6RL.58333$eD%3.35535@fx14.ams1>, doc@reefer.net says...
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e7cae51e41fbef98bad5@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <eIsQL.94963$alff.51280@fx07.ams1>, doc@reefer.net
says...
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e7bd921b745541098baaf@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article
<49c63ece-0e13-4ccd-9728-3f55ec8e977an@googlegroups.com>,
davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 8:45:23PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,.
davidbr...@gmail.com says...
results were finalized during the electoral college vote
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they
wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways
you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent
them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I
believe, number one, you would have had a different
outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6?
as we call it.?
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6
approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled
repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden
failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his
attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump
supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington
so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates
when the election
count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the
House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and
then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the
real electors for the fake ones.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire
presidency to that point. With no background in politics
and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails
constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what
he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected
president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6
push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t
allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply
overturned the election at the Capitol that day. He said as
much on the way to Iowa this week.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a
human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was
fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it,
they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do
it.? Meaning, you understand that, meaning he had the right
to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition
against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center
mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that
day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go
along. But, again, Trump is just using the pitch
rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in
closing a lot of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in
which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to
states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there
would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had
been told over and over that Pence could and might do
exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and
had Pence done what Trump said he should do, Trump would
have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would
have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s
beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was
infuriated because they believed the election should have
been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn
it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the
weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election
was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a
?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort
for retaining power ? were the causes of the day?s
violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do
the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president
couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election
results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pen
ce- jan -6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.OF COURSE
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
Could it be because your guy is a disaster?
No, it's because the sexual-assaulting, coup-inciting, dumbass
narcissist is running for president again.
Any word on Joe?
Any word on your DD214, liar?
I kicked Chad Bryant's ass out of here.
No you didn't, liar.
Oh yea, sent him screaming.
You tell lies here because your real life is complete shit.
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in news:MPG.3e7eac7f31b9986298bba1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <yM6RL.58333$eD%3.35535@fx14.ams1>, doc@reefer.net says...
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e7cae51e41fbef98bad5@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <eIsQL.94963$alff.51280@fx07.ams1>, doc@reefer.net
says...
Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e7bd921b745541098baaf@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article
<49c63ece-0e13-4ccd-9728-3f55ec8e977an@googlegroups.com>,
davidbrown20782@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 8:45:23燩M UTC-4, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <c12d0dcd-4141-4752...@googlegroups.com>,
davidbr...@gmail.com says....
results were finalized during the electoral college vote
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they
wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways
you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent
them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I
believe, number one, you would have had a different
outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6?
as we call it.?
You?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6
approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled
repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden
failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his
attempts to block the results at the Supreme Court were
ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump
supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington
so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates
when the election
count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the
House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and
then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the
real electors for the fake ones.
This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire
presidency to that point. With no background in politics
and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails
constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what
he wanted. And on Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected
president.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6
push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t
allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply
overturned the election at the Capitol that day. He said as
much on the way to Iowa this week.
?They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a
human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was
fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it,
they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do
it.? Meaning, you understand that, meaning he had the right
to do it.?
This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition
against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center
mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that
day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go
along. But, again, Trump is just using the pitch
rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in
closing a lot of sales with his supporters.
With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in
which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to
states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there
would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had
been told over and over that Pence could and might do
exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and
had Pence done what Trump said he should do, Trump would
have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would
have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s
beside the immediate point.
So what is Trump saying?
He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was
infuriated because they believed the election should have
been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn
it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the
weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election
was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a
?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort
for retaining power ? were the causes of the day?s
violence.
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do
the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president
couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election
results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pen >>>>>>>>> ce- jan -6/
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.OF COURSE
Still crying over Trump?Never did.
Could it be because your guy is a disaster?
No, it's because the sexual-assaulting, coup-inciting, dumbass
narcissist is running for president again.
Any word on Joe?
Any word on your DD214, liar?
I kicked Chad Bryant's ass out of here.
No you didn't, liar.
Oh yea, sent him screaming.
You tell lies here because your real life is complete shit.
On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 7:40:55 AM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:one, you would have had a different outcome. But I also believe you wouldn?t have had ?Jan. 6? as we call it.?
In article <beecfbf1-013d-48d9...@googlegroups.com>,
madeforz...@yahoo.com says...
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 4:31:18 PM UTC-4, Skeeter wrote:
In article <22e28991-54f0-48bd...@googlegroups.com>, madeforz...@yahoo.com says...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 7:16:36 PM UTC-4, Ja-Son-Wan-Kenobi Has the High Ground wrote:
Well guess what?!?!?
No, really GUESS!!
YOULL NEVER GUESS!!!!!
Had he sent the votes back to the legislatures, they wouldn?t have had a problem with Jan. 6, so in many ways you can blame him for Jan. 6,? Trump said. ?Had he sent them back to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, the states, I believe, number
That says "Trump is a phucking idiot and narcissist" in so many ways that not even Wikipedia could withstand the force of it.
the results at the Supreme Court were ignored. There was a backup plan, though: Get Trump supporters to send invalid slates of electors to Washington so that Congress had the option of recognizing those slates when theYou?ll recall that this was Trump?s demand as Jan. 6 approached. His efforts to retain power had crumpled repeatedly: First his efforts to block votes for Joe Biden failed; then his legal challenges were thrown out; then his attempts to block
electors for the fake ones.election
results were finalized during the electoral college vote count at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He got Republicans in the House and Senate to agree to challenge the valid results and then pressed Pence both publicly and privately to reject the real
So you're saying he literally tried to stuff the ballot box. No surprise coming from this power-hungry, self-absorbed, delusional, narcissistic, Caesar-in-training.
Jan. 6, he wanted to be reelected president.This idea was very much in keeping with Trump?s entire presidency to that point. With no background in politics and no appreciation for the often-informal guardrails constructed around the presidency, Trump tried to do what he wanted. And on
Trump gave zero shits about the country or the American people. He also had and has zero understanding of how the government works, he probably thinks Marbury v. Madison is a WWE card.
Since that day, Trump has asserted that the post-Jan. 6 push to formalize what the vice president is and isn?t allowed to do proves that Pence could have simply overturned theelection at the Capitol that day. He said as much on the way to Iowa this week.
The man is more clueless to the Constitution than a Denny's placemat.
Just give him a crayon and a maze and tell him if he can find a way to to the end, he gets to be President again.
you understand that, meaning he had the right to do it.??They all said he didn?t have any rights at all, he was a human conveyor belt, he had no rights even if it was fraud,? Trump insisted. ?And then the day after he did it, they said, ?Now we?re going to change it so he doesn?t do it.? Meaning,
*blink*
again, Trump is just using the pitch rationalizing his behavior that has proved effective in closing a lot of sales with his supporters.This is like saying that if there?s no explicit prohibition against pouring LSD into the punch at a senior center mixer, you have the right to do it. The entire play that day was to try it and see if the Supreme Court would go along. But,
what Trump said he should do, Trump would have been closer to his attempted coup. Sure, there would have certainly been a lot of anti-Trump unrest, but that?s beside the immediate point.With that in mind, let?s go back to that first quote, in which he says that Pence sending electoral slates back to states would have averted the riot by Trump supporters.
This is true. If Pence had done what Trump wanted, there would have been jubilation among Trump?s supporters who had been told over and over that Pence could and might do exactly that. They wanted to see Trump retain power, and had Pence done
So what is Trump saying?
That he basically is an asshole and he knows eventually, even if it's 2030, that he's going to have to before a judge for ... something. Hopefully January 6th.YAWN
So which window did you break on January 6th?Double yawn. No wonder you're unemployed.
I've been employed for a long time now, Trumpette. You should stop getting your "information" from Chadlee.
He's been out of the game for years when it comes to stalking skills.
retaining power ? were the causes of the day?s violence.He?s admitting that the crowd at the Capitol that day was infuriated because they believed the election should have been overturned and that Pence had the power to overturn it.
He?s saying that everything he, Trump, had done in the weeks before Jan. 6 ? convince his supporters the election was stolen, lure them to Washington with the promise of a ?wild? protest and point them at Pence as the last resort for
He?s saying that the crowd rioted because Pence didn?t do the thing Trump said he could do, which the vice president couldn?t.
He?s saying that the crowd was there to see the election results overturned and became enraged when they weren?t.
Trump is saying that Jan. 6 was his fault.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/14/trump-pence-jan-6/
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in >>>]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support is
going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I also take
offense at my work being called "fuckery" without specific examples of
such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it does have some
value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to update me
with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could profit from it
should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious cowardice?
I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without several
failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, evasive and
foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just willfully
stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support is
going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I also take
offense at my work being called "fuckery" without specific examples of
such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it does have some
value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to update me
with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in the Arts of
"Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could profit from it
should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious cowardice?
I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at least as much as
possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without several
failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, evasive and
foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse of
substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust for. It's
actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just willfully
stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the "Ostrich
Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support
is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I also
take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without specific
examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it
does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to update
me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in the Arts
of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could profit
from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious cowardice?
I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at least as much
as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without several
failed attempts at making yourself look dishonest, evasive and
foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse of
substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust for.
It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the "Ostrich
Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support
is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I also
take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without specific
examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it
does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to update
me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in the Arts
of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could profit
from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious cowardice?
I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at least as much
as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without several
failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, evasive and
foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse of
substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust for.
It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the "Ostrich
Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support
is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I also
take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without specific
examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it
does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to update
me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in the Arts
of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could profit
from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious cowardice?
I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at least as much
as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without several
failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, evasive and
foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse of
substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust for.
It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the "Ostrich
Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I understand. It is
pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer, though? I thought you guys had a lot
in common.
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a >>>>>>>>>> disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support
is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I
also take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without
specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I
suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to
update me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in
the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could
profit from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at
least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse
of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust
for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be
doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the
"Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest form of
life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are beneath even
them.
hth :-)
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in ]news:tv66fj$2sejg$1@dont-email.me:
Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) <mark@rube.con> wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support
is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I also
take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without specific
examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it
does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to update
me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in the Arts
of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could profit
from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious cowardice?
I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at least as much
as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without several
failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, evasive and
foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse of
substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust for.
It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the "Ostrich
Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Freezer is consummately poundable, so I am compelled to reject your
proposition and condone the earlier post.
After all, there is a reason that he counts himself as an ideological
ally of cowardly Chad and moronic John DeJong…
I didn't realize they were all ideologically aligned. What sort of donations were
provided by these allies during the recent fundraising effort?
Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) <mark@rube.con> wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support
is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I also
take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without specific
examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it
does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to update
me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in the Arts
of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could profit
from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious cowardice?
I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at least as much
as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without several
failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, evasive and
foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse of
substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust for.
It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the "Ostrich
Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Freezer is consummately poundable, so I am compelled to reject your proposition and condone the earlier post.
After all, there is a reason that he counts himself as an ideological
ally of cowardly Chad and moronic John DeJong…
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a
disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support is
going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I also take
offense at my work being called "fuckery" without specific examples of
such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it does have some
value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to update me
with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in the Arts of
"Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could profit from it
should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious cowardice?
I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at least as much as
possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without several
failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, evasive and
foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse of
substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust for. It's
actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just willfully
stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the "Ostrich
Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a >>>>>>>>>>> disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and >>>>>>> "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support >>>>>> is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I
also take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without
specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I
suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to
update me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in
the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could >>>>>> profit from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at
least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse
of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust
for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be
doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the
"Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest form of
life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are beneath even
them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for certain that
you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your beef with John and Chad, too?
They seem like pretty cool guys to me.
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a >>>>>>>>>> disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven?t had a blowjob since the
nineties?
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and >>>>>> "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support >>>>> is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I
also take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without
specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I
suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to
update me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in
the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could >>>>> profit from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at
least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse
of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust
for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be
doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the
"Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest form of
life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for certain that
you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your beef with John and Chad, too?
They seem like pretty cool guys to me.
In article <tv66ae$um51$1@paganini.bofh.team>, mark@rube.con says...
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a >>>>>>>>>>>> disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven�t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>> nineties�
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and >>>>>>>> "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support >>>>>>> is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I
also take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without
specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I
suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give >>>>>>> you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to
update me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in >>>>>>> the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could >>>>>>> profit from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at >>>>>>> least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse >>>>>>> of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust >>>>>>> for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be
doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the
"Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest form of
life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are beneath even
them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for certain that
you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your beef with John and Chad, too?
They seem like pretty cool guys to me.
I smell a sock.
Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) <mark@rube.con> wrote:
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv66fj$2sejg$1@dont-email.me:
Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) <mark@rube.con> wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a >>>>>>>>>> disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" and
"Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's support
is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] more. I also
take offense at my work being called "fuckery" without specific
examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it
does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give
you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to update >>>>> me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology in the Arts
of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry could profit
from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious cowardice?
I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at least as much
as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without several >>>>> failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, evasive and
foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse of
substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to adjust for.
It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers should be doing that. >>>>>
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the "Ostrich
Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Freezer is consummately poundable, so I am compelled to reject your
proposition and condone the earlier post.
After all, there is a reason that he counts himself as an ideological
ally of cowardly Chad and moronic John DeJong…
I didn't realize they were all ideologically aligned. What sort of donations were
provided by these allies during the recent fundraising effort?
Zero. They thought only of their cowardly selves and gave nothing to their fellow man.
So you can see how much they have in common with Chad and JHD…
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a >>>>>>>>>>>> disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question"
and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's
support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1]
more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery"
without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for
it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give >>>>>>> you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to
update me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology
in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry
could profit from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at >>>>>>> least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse >>>>>>> of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to
adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers
should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another
application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the
"Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest form
of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are beneath
even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for
certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I
don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero respect for
what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on the street.
Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina immigrants
whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could ever hope to
have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a >>>>>>>>>>>>> disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" >>>>>>>>> and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's
support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] >>>>>>>> more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery"
without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for >>>>>>>> it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give >>>>>>>> you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to
update me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology >>>>>>>> in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry >>>>>>>> could profit from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at >>>>>>>> least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse >>>>>>>> of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to
adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers
should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another >>>>>>>> application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the
"Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest form
of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are beneath
even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for
certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I
don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get money
preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero respect for
what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on the street.
Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina immigrants
whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could ever hope to
have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who just got mixed up
in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do you determine who to kick around
by trollishness or political beliefs or what? I could be wrong, but it seems like
that Davey guy who insulted your profession and implied it was only suitable for
useless losers leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the truce, and what
makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of abuse?
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 10:51 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote inAnyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" >>>>>>>>>> and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's
support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] >>>>>>>>> more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery"
without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for >>>>>>>>> it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would
give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel
free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary
methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm
sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, >>>>>>>>> at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without >>>>>>>>> several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, >>>>>>>>> evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the
abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected >>>>>>>>> to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers >>>>>>>>> should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as >>>>>>>>> the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor? >>>>>>>
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest
form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are
beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for
certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to
me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I
don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get
money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero
respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on
the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina
immigrants whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could
ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who just
got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do you
determine who to kick around by trollishness or political beliefs or
what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey guy who insulted
your profession and implied it was only suitable for useless losers
leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the truce, and what
makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of abuse?
I insult my own profession, nobody willfully goes into the janitorial industry if they don't have some sort of issue or problem. Duh.
I'm not abusing Freezer, he's a big boy playing in the political arena
and dishes out as much as he gets.
John is a ridiculous person writing ridiculous things. It's
self-evident.
I had to pick between Chad vs. Alex, so I tossed a coin. Plus more
people seemed to be against Chad than against Alex, so I went with the winning team.
Any more questions?
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv7k5k$342kh$2@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 10:51 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" >>>>>>>>>>> and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] >>>>>>>>>> more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery" >>>>>>>>>> without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for >>>>>>>>>> it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, >>>>>>>>>> at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence. >>>>>>>>>>
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without >>>>>>>>>> several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, >>>>>>>>>> evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected >>>>>>>>>> to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers >>>>>>>>>> should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as >>>>>>>>>> the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor? >>>>>>>>
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest
form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are
beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for
certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to
me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I
don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get
money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero
respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on
the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina
immigrants whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could
ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who just
got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do you
determine who to kick around by trollishness or political beliefs or
what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey guy who insulted
your profession and implied it was only suitable for useless losers
leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the truce, and what
makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of abuse?
I insult my own profession, nobody willfully goes into the janitorial
industry if they don't have some sort of issue or problem. Duh.
I'm not abusing Freezer, he's a big boy playing in the political arena
and dishes out as much as he gets.
John is a ridiculous person writing ridiculous things. It's
self-evident.
I had to pick between Chad vs. Alex, so I tossed a coin. Plus more
people seemed to be against Chad than against Alex, so I went with the
winning team.
Any more questions?
I have a few more. Sorry to bother you. It's just that I'm a little concerned about the treatment here of Freezer when he doesn't really seem to participate
much, and (I could be wrong) doesn't seem to dish out anywhere close to as much
grief as he gets. He seems like a pretty cool guy to me, and someone whom you probably have a lot in common with. Why don't you get to know Freezer better? Maybe make some attempts at discussion which aren't combative? I know you like
the rap music. I saw some posts you made about "E 40" and "Tupac". Why not try to
chat with Freezer about that? He likes MST3k and anime, do you like those? What
if you could build a friendship?
What was the issue or problem which drove you into the janitorial industry, btw?
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 11:34 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv7k5k$342kh$2@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 10:51 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>> Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the >>>>>>>>>>>> terroists win.I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a
question" and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery." >>>>>>>>>>>
bluewashed[1] more. I also take offense at my work being >>>>>>>>>>> called "fuckery" without specific examples of such. I get >>>>>>>>>>> paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it does have some
value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to >>>>>>>>>>> scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious >>>>>>>>>>> cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I >>>>>>>>>>> can, at least as much as possible given your ample
incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without >>>>>>>>>>> several failed attempts at making yourself look as
dishonest, evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem. >>>>>>>>>>>
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be
expected to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, >>>>>>>>>>> your keepers should be doing that.
[1]
https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish. >>>>>>>>>>>
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known >>>>>>>>>>> as the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to
Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I >>>>>>>> understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer, >>>>>>>> though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest
form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad
are beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know
for certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's
your beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool
guys to me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's
boilerplate leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he
could be a swell guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks.
I don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get
money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero
respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on
the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina
immigrants whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he
could ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who
just got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do
you determine who to kick around by trollishness or political
beliefs or what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey guy
who insulted your profession and implied it was only suitable for
useless losers leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the
truce, and what makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of
abuse?
I insult my own profession, nobody willfully goes into the
janitorial industry if they don't have some sort of issue or
problem. Duh.
I'm not abusing Freezer, he's a big boy playing in the political
arena and dishes out as much as he gets.
John is a ridiculous person writing ridiculous things. It's
self-evident.
I had to pick between Chad vs. Alex, so I tossed a coin. Plus more
people seemed to be against Chad than against Alex, so I went with
the winning team.
Any more questions?
I have a few more. Sorry to bother you. It's just that I'm a little
concerned about the treatment here of Freezer when he doesn't really
seem to participate much, and (I could be wrong) doesn't seem to dish
out anywhere close to as much grief as he gets. He seems like a
pretty cool guy to me, and someone whom you probably have a lot in
common with. Why don't you get to know Freezer better? Maybe make
some attempts at discussion which aren't combative? I know you like
the rap music. I saw some posts you made about "E 40" and "Tupac".
Why not try to chat with Freezer about that? He likes MST3k and
anime, do you like those? What if you could build a friendship?
I told you, I have nothing against the guy personally, that would be
stupid, I don't know him.
What was the issue or problem which drove you into the janitorial
industry, btw?
I was going nowhere in life, I was looking for part-time work to make
some extra money, and I like working alone. I decided if I'm going to
do this work then I might as well make the most of it and try to learn
as much as I can. My evil capitalist boss liked my wage-slave work
ethic and it sort of took off from there.
Now I have a question for you: why are you socking up? Why don't you
just be a man and be real?
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv7k5k$342kh$2@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 10:51 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>> "Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven?t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>> nineties?
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" >>>>>>>>>> and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] >>>>>>>>> more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery" >>>>>>>>> without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for >>>>>>>>> it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, >>>>>>>>> at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence. >>>>>>>>>
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without >>>>>>>>> several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, >>>>>>>>> evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected >>>>>>>>> to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers >>>>>>>>> should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as >>>>>>>>> the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor? >>>>>>>
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest
form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are
beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for
certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to
me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I
don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get
money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero
respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on
the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina
immigrants whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could
ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who just
got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do you
determine who to kick around by trollishness or political beliefs or
what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey guy who insulted
your profession and implied it was only suitable for useless losers
leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the truce, and what
makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of abuse?
I insult my own profession, nobody willfully goes into the janitorial industry if they don't have some sort of issue or problem. Duh.
I'm not abusing Freezer, he's a big boy playing in the political arena
and dishes out as much as he gets.
John is a ridiculous person writing ridiculous things. It's
self-evident.
I had to pick between Chad vs. Alex, so I tossed a coin. Plus more
people seemed to be against Chad than against Alex, so I went with the winning team.
Any more questions?
I have a few more. Sorry to bother you. It's just that I'm a little concerned about the treatment here of Freezer when he doesn't really seem to participate
much, and (I could be wrong) doesn't seem to dish out anywhere close to as much
grief as he gets. He seems like a pretty cool guy to me, and someone whom you probably have a lot in common with. Why don't you get to know Freezer better? Maybe make some attempts at discussion which aren't combative? I know you like
the rap music. I saw some posts you made about "E 40" and "Tupac". Why not try to
chat with Freezer about that? He likes MST3k and anime, do you like those? What
if you could build a friendship?
What was the issue or problem which drove you into the janitorial industry, btw?
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is a >>>>>>>>>>>>> disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" >>>>>>>>> and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's
support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] >>>>>>>> more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery"
without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for >>>>>>>> it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would give >>>>>>>> you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel free to
update me with your transcendant and revolutionary methodology >>>>>>>> in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm sure John Henry >>>>>>>> could profit from it should he go back to scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, at >>>>>>>> least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the abuse >>>>>>>> of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected to
adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers
should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or another >>>>>>>> application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as the
"Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest form
of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are beneath
even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for
certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I
don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get money
preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero respect for
what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on the street.
Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina immigrants
whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could ever hope to
have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who just got mixed up
in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do you determine who to kick around
by trollishness or political beliefs or what? I could be wrong, but it seems like
that Davey guy who insulted your profession and implied it was only suitable for
useless losers leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the truce, and what
makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of abuse?
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 11:34 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv7k5k$342kh$2@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 10:51 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>> Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the >>>>>>>>>>>> terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" >>>>>>>>>>>> and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] >>>>>>>>>>> more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery" >>>>>>>>>>> without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for >>>>>>>>>>> it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to >>>>>>>>>>> scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious >>>>>>>>>>> cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, >>>>>>>>>>> at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence. >>>>>>>>>>>
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without >>>>>>>>>>> several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, >>>>>>>>>>> evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected >>>>>>>>>>> to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers >>>>>>>>>>> should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish. >>>>>>>>>>>
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as >>>>>>>>>>> the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor? >>>>>>>>>
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I >>>>>>>> understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer, >>>>>>>> though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest
form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are >>>>>>> beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for >>>>>> certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to
me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I >>>>> don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get
money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero
respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on
the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina
immigrants whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could
ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who just
got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do you
determine who to kick around by trollishness or political beliefs or
what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey guy who insulted
your profession and implied it was only suitable for useless losers
leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the truce, and what
makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of abuse?
I insult my own profession, nobody willfully goes into the janitorial
industry if they don't have some sort of issue or problem. Duh.
I'm not abusing Freezer, he's a big boy playing in the political arena
and dishes out as much as he gets.
John is a ridiculous person writing ridiculous things. It's
self-evident.
I had to pick between Chad vs. Alex, so I tossed a coin. Plus more
people seemed to be against Chad than against Alex, so I went with the
winning team.
Any more questions?
I have a few more. Sorry to bother you. It's just that I'm a little concerned
about the treatment here of Freezer when he doesn't really seem to participate
much, and (I could be wrong) doesn't seem to dish out anywhere close to as much
grief as he gets. He seems like a pretty cool guy to me, and someone whom you
probably have a lot in common with. Why don't you get to know Freezer better?
Maybe make some attempts at discussion which aren't combative? I know you like
the rap music. I saw some posts you made about "E 40" and "Tupac". Why not try to
chat with Freezer about that? He likes MST3k and anime, do you like those? What
if you could build a friendship?
I told you, I have nothing against the guy personally, that would be
stupid, I don't know him.
What was the issue or problem which drove you into the janitorial industry, btw?
I was going nowhere in life, I was looking for part-time work to make
some extra money, and I like working alone. I decided if I'm going to
do this work then I might as well make the most of it and try to learn
as much as I can. My evil capitalist boss liked my wage-slave work
ethic and it sort of took off from there.
Now I have a question for you: why are you socking up? Why don't you
just be a man and be real?
Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) <mark@rube.con> wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote inAnyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" >>>>>>>>>> and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's
support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] >>>>>>>>> more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery"
without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for >>>>>>>>> it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would
give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel
free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary
methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm
sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, >>>>>>>>> at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without >>>>>>>>> several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, >>>>>>>>> evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the
abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected >>>>>>>>> to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers >>>>>>>>> should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as >>>>>>>>> the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor? >>>>>>>
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest
form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are
beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for
certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to
me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I
don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get
money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero
respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on
the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina
immigrants whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could
ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who just
got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do you
determine who to kick around by trollishness or political beliefs or
what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey guy who insulted
your profession and implied it was only suitable for useless losers
leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the truce, and what
makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of abuse?
They’re imbeciles who think they can hide behind instantly
recognisable moronic identities, and that no one will notice or
belittle them.
But we like belittling you…
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 11:34 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv7k5k$342kh$2@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 10:51 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>>> Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses)
wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247: >>>>>>>>>>>>
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the >>>>>>>>>>>>> terroists win.I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a
question" and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery." >>>>>>>>>>>>
bluewashed[1] more. I also take offense at my work being >>>>>>>>>>>> called "fuckery" without specific examples of such. I get >>>>>>>>>>>> paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it does have some >>>>>>>>>>>> value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to >>>>>>>>>>>> scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious >>>>>>>>>>>> cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I >>>>>>>>>>>> can, at least as much as possible given your ample
incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate
without several failed attempts at making yourself look as >>>>>>>>>>>> dishonest, evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be
expected to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, >>>>>>>>>>>> your keepers should be doing that.
[1]
https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish. >>>>>>>>>>>>
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or >>>>>>>>>>>> another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known >>>>>>>>>>>> as the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to
Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess >>>>>>>>> I understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with
Freezer, though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest >>>>>>>> form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad
are beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know
for certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's >>>>>>> your beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool
guys to me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's
boilerplate leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he
could be a swell guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun
to kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking
hacks. I don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he
could get money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less
than zero respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for
him being on the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he
called Latina immigrants whores. They have infinitely more
dignity than he could ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who
just got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do
you determine who to kick around by trollishness or political
beliefs or what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey
guy who insulted your profession and implied it was only suitable
for useless losers leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with
the truce, and what makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of
abuse?
I insult my own profession, nobody willfully goes into the
janitorial industry if they don't have some sort of issue or
problem. Duh.
I'm not abusing Freezer, he's a big boy playing in the political
arena and dishes out as much as he gets.
John is a ridiculous person writing ridiculous things. It's
self-evident.
I had to pick between Chad vs. Alex, so I tossed a coin. Plus more
people seemed to be against Chad than against Alex, so I went with
the winning team.
Any more questions?
I have a few more. Sorry to bother you. It's just that I'm a little
concerned about the treatment here of Freezer when he doesn't really
seem to participate much, and (I could be wrong) doesn't seem to
dish out anywhere close to as much grief as he gets. He seems like a
pretty cool guy to me, and someone whom you probably have a lot in
common with. Why don't you get to know Freezer better? Maybe make
some attempts at discussion which aren't combative? I know you like
the rap music. I saw some posts you made about "E 40" and "Tupac".
Why not try to chat with Freezer about that? He likes MST3k and
anime, do you like those? What if you could build a friendship?
I told you, I have nothing against the guy personally, that would be
stupid, I don't know him.
What was the issue or problem which drove you into the janitorial
industry, btw?
I was going nowhere in life, I was looking for part-time work to make
some extra money, and I like working alone. I decided if I'm going
to do this work then I might as well make the most of it and try to
learn as much as I can. My evil capitalist boss liked my wage-slave
work ethic and it sort of took off from there.
Now I have a question for you: why are you socking up? Why don't you
just be a man and be real?
Notwithstanding your own candour, he won’t be able to answer this.
Watch him hide from the question…
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv7l93$349c6$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 11:34 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv7k5k$342kh$2@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 10:51 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>>> Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247: >>>>>>>>>>>>
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the >>>>>>>>>>>>> terroists win.I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a
question" and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery." >>>>>>>>>>>>
bluewashed[1] more. I also take offense at my work being >>>>>>>>>>>> called "fuckery" without specific examples of such. I get >>>>>>>>>>>> paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it does have some >>>>>>>>>>>> value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to >>>>>>>>>>>> scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious >>>>>>>>>>>> cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I >>>>>>>>>>>> can, at least as much as possible given your ample
incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without >>>>>>>>>>>> several failed attempts at making yourself look as
dishonest, evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be
expected to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, >>>>>>>>>>>> your keepers should be doing that.
[1]
https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish. >>>>>>>>>>>>
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or >>>>>>>>>>>> another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known >>>>>>>>>>>> as the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to
Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I >>>>>>>>> understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer, >>>>>>>>> though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest >>>>>>>> form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad
are beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know
for certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's >>>>>>> your beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool
guys to me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's
boilerplate leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he
could be a swell guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to >>>>>> kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks.
I don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get >>>>>> money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero
respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on >>>>>> the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina >>>>>> immigrants whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he
could ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who
just got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do
you determine who to kick around by trollishness or political
beliefs or what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey guy
who insulted your profession and implied it was only suitable for
useless losers leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the
truce, and what makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of
abuse?
I insult my own profession, nobody willfully goes into the
janitorial industry if they don't have some sort of issue or
problem. Duh.
I'm not abusing Freezer, he's a big boy playing in the political
arena and dishes out as much as he gets.
John is a ridiculous person writing ridiculous things. It's
self-evident.
I had to pick between Chad vs. Alex, so I tossed a coin. Plus more
people seemed to be against Chad than against Alex, so I went with
the winning team.
Any more questions?
I have a few more. Sorry to bother you. It's just that I'm a little
concerned about the treatment here of Freezer when he doesn't really
seem to participate much, and (I could be wrong) doesn't seem to dish
out anywhere close to as much grief as he gets. He seems like a
pretty cool guy to me, and someone whom you probably have a lot in
common with. Why don't you get to know Freezer better? Maybe make
some attempts at discussion which aren't combative? I know you like
the rap music. I saw some posts you made about "E 40" and "Tupac".
Why not try to chat with Freezer about that? He likes MST3k and
anime, do you like those? What if you could build a friendship?
I told you, I have nothing against the guy personally, that would be
stupid, I don't know him.
What was the issue or problem which drove you into the janitorial
industry, btw?
I was going nowhere in life, I was looking for part-time work to make
some extra money, and I like working alone. I decided if I'm going to
do this work then I might as well make the most of it and try to learn
as much as I can. My evil capitalist boss liked my wage-slave work
ethic and it sort of took off from there.
Now I have a question for you: why are you socking up? Why don't you
just be a man and be real?
B-Real is another artist you could chat about with Freezer.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in ]news:tv7rql$35fnu$1@dont-email.me:
Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) <mark@rube.con> wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" >>>>>>>>>>> and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] >>>>>>>>>> more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery" >>>>>>>>>> without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for >>>>>>>>>> it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, >>>>>>>>>> at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence. >>>>>>>>>>
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without >>>>>>>>>> several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, >>>>>>>>>> evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected >>>>>>>>>> to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers >>>>>>>>>> should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as >>>>>>>>>> the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor? >>>>>>>>
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest
form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are
beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for
certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to
me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I
don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get
money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero
respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on
the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina
immigrants whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could
ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who just
got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do you
determine who to kick around by trollishness or political beliefs or
what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey guy who insulted
your profession and implied it was only suitable for useless losers
leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the truce, and what
makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of abuse?
They’re imbeciles who think they can hide behind instantly
recognisable moronic identities, and that no one will notice or
belittle them.
But we like belittling you…
Chad has been accused of socking up as dozens of identities. There may be truth
there.
John has been accused of socking up a few times, notably as Robert Gibson's Glass
Eye. I think he's usually come clean about it? Would have to check.
But Freezer? How does Freezer fit in? I could be wrong, but he's never been accused of socking up and has only posted as Freezer for the longest time. Say
what you will about Chad and John, but what's the evidence for lumping Freezer in
that group?
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in ]news:tv7s0s$35h19$1@dont-email.me:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 11:34 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv7k5k$342kh$2@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 10:51 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>> Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses)
wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> terroists win.I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> question" and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery." >>>>>>>>>>>>>
bluewashed[1] more. I also take offense at my work being >>>>>>>>>>>>> called "fuckery" without specific examples of such. I get >>>>>>>>>>>>> paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it does have some >>>>>>>>>>>>> value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to >>>>>>>>>>>>> scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious >>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I >>>>>>>>>>>>> can, at least as much as possible given your ample
incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate >>>>>>>>>>>>> without several failed attempts at making yourself look as >>>>>>>>>>>>> dishonest, evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be >>>>>>>>>>>>> expected to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, >>>>>>>>>>>>> your keepers should be doing that.
[1]
https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or >>>>>>>>>>>>> another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known >>>>>>>>>>>>> as the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to
Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess >>>>>>>>>> I understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with
Freezer, though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest >>>>>>>>> form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad >>>>>>>>> are beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know >>>>>>>> for certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's >>>>>>>> your beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool
guys to me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's
boilerplate leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he
could be a swell guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun
to kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking
hacks. I don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he >>>>>>> could get money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less
than zero respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for
him being on the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he >>>>>>> called Latina immigrants whores. They have infinitely more
dignity than he could ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump. >>>>>>>
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who
just got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do >>>>>> you determine who to kick around by trollishness or political
beliefs or what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey
guy who insulted your profession and implied it was only suitable
for useless losers leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with
the truce, and what makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of
abuse?
I insult my own profession, nobody willfully goes into the
janitorial industry if they don't have some sort of issue or
problem. Duh.
I'm not abusing Freezer, he's a big boy playing in the political
arena and dishes out as much as he gets.
John is a ridiculous person writing ridiculous things. It's
self-evident.
I had to pick between Chad vs. Alex, so I tossed a coin. Plus more
people seemed to be against Chad than against Alex, so I went with
the winning team.
Any more questions?
I have a few more. Sorry to bother you. It's just that I'm a little
concerned about the treatment here of Freezer when he doesn't really
seem to participate much, and (I could be wrong) doesn't seem to
dish out anywhere close to as much grief as he gets. He seems like a
pretty cool guy to me, and someone whom you probably have a lot in
common with. Why don't you get to know Freezer better? Maybe make
some attempts at discussion which aren't combative? I know you like
the rap music. I saw some posts you made about "E 40" and "Tupac".
Why not try to chat with Freezer about that? He likes MST3k and
anime, do you like those? What if you could build a friendship?
I told you, I have nothing against the guy personally, that would be
stupid, I don't know him.
What was the issue or problem which drove you into the janitorial
industry, btw?
I was going nowhere in life, I was looking for part-time work to make
some extra money, and I like working alone. I decided if I'm going
to do this work then I might as well make the most of it and try to
learn as much as I can. My evil capitalist boss liked my wage-slave
work ethic and it sort of took off from there.
Now I have a question for you: why are you socking up? Why don't you
just be a man and be real?
Notwithstanding your own candour, he won’t be able to answer this.
Watch him hide from the question…
Well, we all have our flaws and failings.
Will you be man enough to apologize to Freezer for implying that he uses sockpuppets when there is no evidence indicating that?
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in ]news:tv7rql$35fnu$1@dont-email.me:
Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) <mark@rube.con> wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>> "Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven?t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>> nineties?
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question" >>>>>>>>>> and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1] >>>>>>>>> more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery" >>>>>>>>> without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for >>>>>>>>> it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can, >>>>>>>>> at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence. >>>>>>>>>
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without >>>>>>>>> several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest, >>>>>>>>> evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected >>>>>>>>> to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers >>>>>>>>> should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as >>>>>>>>> the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to Janithor? >>>>>>>
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess I
understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with Freezer,
though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest
form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad are
beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know for
certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's your
beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool guys to
me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's boilerplate
leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he could be a swell
guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun to
kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking hacks. I
don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he could get
money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less than zero
respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for him being on
the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he called Latina
immigrants whores. They have infinitely more dignity than he could
ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump.
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who just
got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do you
determine who to kick around by trollishness or political beliefs or
what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey guy who insulted
your profession and implied it was only suitable for useless losers
leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with the truce, and what
makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of abuse?
They?re imbeciles who think they can hide behind instantly
recognisable moronic identities, and that no one will notice or
belittle them.
But we like belittling you?
Chad has been accused of socking up as dozens of identities. There may be truth
there.
John has been accused of socking up a few times, notably as Robert Gibson's Glass
Eye. I think he's usually come clean about it? Would have to check.
But Freezer? How does Freezer fit in? I could be wrong, but he's never been accused of socking up and has only posted as Freezer for the longest time. Say
what you will about Chad and John, but what's the evidence for lumping Freezer in
that group?
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in ]news:tv7s0s$35h19$1@dont-email.me:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 11:34 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv7k5k$342kh$2@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/19/2023 10:51 AM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote:
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv68el$2slht$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:24 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>> Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv65dp$2s96f$1@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 10:02 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:tv61p5$2rmvi$3@dont-email.me:
x-no-archive: yes
On 3/18/2023 8:53 PM, Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses)
wrote:
"Davey Zimmerman #274" <Chadweasel274@zoho.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsAFCB9B86812ECReallyNotChad@88.198.57.247:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> terroists win.I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's >>>>>>>>>>>>> support is going into the toilet as it's getting
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> question" and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery." >>>>>>>>>>>>>
bluewashed[1] more. I also take offense at my work being >>>>>>>>>>>>> called "fuckery" without specific examples of such. I get >>>>>>>>>>>>> paid quite nicely for it so I suppose it does have some >>>>>>>>>>>>> value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would >>>>>>>>>>>>> give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel >>>>>>>>>>>>> free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary >>>>>>>>>>>>> methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to >>>>>>>>>>>>> scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious >>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I >>>>>>>>>>>>> can, at least as much as possible given your ample
incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate >>>>>>>>>>>>> without several failed attempts at making yourself look as >>>>>>>>>>>>> dishonest, evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the >>>>>>>>>>>>> abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be >>>>>>>>>>>>> expected to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, >>>>>>>>>>>>> your keepers should be doing that.
[1]
https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just >>>>>>>>>>>>> willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or >>>>>>>>>>>>> another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known >>>>>>>>>>>>> as the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
Isn't this entire response extremely disrespectful to
Janithor?
Anyone smacking around Freezer is OK in my book.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess >>>>>>>>>> I understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with
Freezer, though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
He's a communist. I am not. And yes, janitors are the lowest >>>>>>>>> form of life on earth, other than carnies. And John and Chad >>>>>>>>> are beneath even them.
hth :-)
Have you had sufficient direct interaction with Freezer to know >>>>>>>> for certain that you don't like him and he's a communist? What's >>>>>>>> your beef with John and Chad, too? They seem like pretty cool
guys to me.
I've seen enough of what he's written to know that he's
boilerplate leftist hack, yes. I didn't say I dislike him, he
could be a swell guy, I don't know him personally.
My beef with John and Chad are that I'm a troll and they're fun
to kick around. Well, plus they're also leftist non-thinking
hacks. I don't think John has a genuine bone in his body, if he >>>>>>> could get money preaching the gospel he'd do that. I have less
than zero respect for what he writes. I have zero sympathy for
him being on the street. Zero. He really exposed himself when he >>>>>>> called Latina immigrants whores. They have infinitely more
dignity than he could ever hope to have. And I voted for Trump. >>>>>>>
hth
Wait, you're a troll? I thought you were a normal kinda guy who
just got mixed up in the crazy world of usenet crossposting. So do >>>>>> you determine who to kick around by trollishness or political
beliefs or what? I could be wrong, but it seems like that Davey
guy who insulted your profession and implied it was only suitable
for useless losers leans left, and so does Metaphoid. What's with
the truce, and what makes Freezer, John, and Chad good targets of
abuse?
I insult my own profession, nobody willfully goes into the
janitorial industry if they don't have some sort of issue or
problem. Duh.
I'm not abusing Freezer, he's a big boy playing in the political
arena and dishes out as much as he gets.
John is a ridiculous person writing ridiculous things. It's
self-evident.
I had to pick between Chad vs. Alex, so I tossed a coin. Plus more
people seemed to be against Chad than against Alex, so I went with
the winning team.
Any more questions?
I have a few more. Sorry to bother you. It's just that I'm a little
concerned about the treatment here of Freezer when he doesn't really
seem to participate much, and (I could be wrong) doesn't seem to
dish out anywhere close to as much grief as he gets. He seems like a
pretty cool guy to me, and someone whom you probably have a lot in
common with. Why don't you get to know Freezer better? Maybe make
some attempts at discussion which aren't combative? I know you like
the rap music. I saw some posts you made about "E 40" and "Tupac".
Why not try to chat with Freezer about that? He likes MST3k and
anime, do you like those? What if you could build a friendship?
I told you, I have nothing against the guy personally, that would be
stupid, I don't know him.
What was the issue or problem which drove you into the janitorial
industry, btw?
I was going nowhere in life, I was looking for part-time work to make
some extra money, and I like working alone. I decided if I'm going
to do this work then I might as well make the most of it and try to
learn as much as I can. My evil capitalist boss liked my wage-slave
work ethic and it sort of took off from there.
Now I have a question for you: why are you socking up? Why don't you
just be a man and be real?
Notwithstanding your own candour, he won’t be able to answer this.
Watch him hide from the question…
Well, we all have our flaws and failings.
Will you be man enough to apologize to Freezer for implying that he uses sockpuppets when there is no evidence indicating that?
In article
<XnsAFCAF151B7B94freezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247>, freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
In article
<XnsAFC9F26651986freezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247>,
freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Any word on Joe?
He's in California, meeting with families and survivors of
the Monterey Park massacre.
Next?
Publicity stunt. He's a fucking joke. Spy balloon? No big
deal.
What would you have him do? Declare war with China?
Knock our drone out of the sky? No big deal.
You do know that provoking Biden into doing something major
is just what Russia wants, right?
RIGHT?
You support Russia. OK then.
Is that what you call running from the truth?
Freezer is consummately poundable
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in >>>]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is
a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question"
and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's
support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1]
more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery"
without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for
it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would
give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel
free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary
methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm
sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can,
at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the
abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected
to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers
should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as
the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
I think the Donald would be very sad if he ever found out
about the mean things you Tve been saying about him.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess
I understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with
Freezer, though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
Georgia special grand jury heard a recorded call in which
Trump pressured the state's House Speaker to convene a
session to overturn the 2020 vote: report
https://www.businessinsider.com/georgia-grand-jury-recorded-ca
ll-trump-house-speaker-david-ralston-2023-3
Yawn
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post,
the terroists win.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess
I understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with
Freezer, though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
Bite your goddamned tongue, sir!
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in >>>>]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is
a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven’t had a blowjob since the
nineties…
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question"
and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's
support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1]
more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery"
without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for
it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would
give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel
free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary
methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm
sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can,
at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the
abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected
to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers
should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as
the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
That's nice, dear. *pats on head*
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
In article
<XnsAFCAF151B7B94freezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247>, freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
In article
<XnsAFC9F26651986freezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247>,
freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Any word on Joe?
He's in California, meeting with families and survivors of
the Monterey Park massacre.
Next?
Publicity stunt. He's a fucking joke. Spy balloon? No big
deal.
What would you have him do? Declare war with China?
Knock our drone out of the sky? No big deal.
You do know that provoking Biden into doing something major
is just what Russia wants, right?
RIGHT?
You support Russia. OK then.
You have no answers to my questions. OK then.
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Is that what you call running from the truth?
You lot wouldn't know the truth if if sat on your face and charged
you $100K for the ride.
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in >>>]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is
a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven?t had a blowjob since the
nineties?
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question"
and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's
support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1]
more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery"
without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for
it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would
give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel
free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary
methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm
sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can,
at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the
abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected
to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers
should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as
the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
That's nice, dear. *pats on head*
If I don't reply to this ]v[etaphoid post, the terroists win.
Freezer is consummately poundable
Flattering, but I don't swing that way.
#NotThatTheresAnythingWrongWithThat
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
YAWN
When you can't defend and you can't refute, no sell.
Kudos for not mentioning "email servers" or "laptops", though.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post,
the terroists win.
If you won't stand up for and defend your profession, I guess
I understand. It is pretty lowly. What's your beef with
Freezer, though? I thought you guys had a lot in common.
Bite your goddamned tongue, sir!
Did you really just respond to this thread, eight times in a row, without landing a single blow?
Surely the clock?s ticking on your next Usenet vacation?
In article <XnsAFCD9556152freezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247>,
freezer88 @hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsAFCAF0D60D4FCfreezer88hotmailcom@88.198.57.247:
If I don't reply to this Davey Zimmerman #274 post, the
terroists win.
]v[etaphoid <meta@lowincomegenius.com> wrote in
]news:tv163u$1rqdf$1@dont-email.me:
Freezer <freezer88@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
If I don't reply to this Skeeter post, the terroists win.
Wapo = Liberal biased bullshit.
Still crying over Trump? Could it be because your guy is
a disaster?
Son, you're still salty Bill Clinton got a blow job in the
Oval Office.
Speaking of people who haven?t had a blowjob since the
nineties?
Or a question he wouldn't run away from!
There is a difference between "running away from a question"
and "Refusing to dignify your redhat fuckery."
I do work with RedHat but prefer SUSE these days. RedHat's
support is going into the toilet as it's getting bluewashed[1]
more. I also take offense at my work being called "fuckery"
without specific examples of such. I get paid quite nicely for
it so I suppose it does have some value.
How about you? I can't imagine any potential employer would
give you much leeway about how you clean toilets. But feel
free to update me with your transcendant and revolutionary
methodology in the Arts of "Janitorical Deployment"[2]. I'm
sure John Henry could profit from it should he go back to
scutwork.
But let's get back to your cowardice and lies...
So what do my paid labors have to do with your notorious
cowardice? I've answered your questions as honestly as I can,
at least as much as possible given your ample incoherence.
As you've repeatedly demonstrated, you cannot debate without
several failed attempts at making yourself look as dishonest,
evasive and foolish is certainly not my problem.
Your issues, be they genetic, environmental or through the
abuse of substances[3], aren't something I should be expected
to adjust for. It's actually quite the opposite, your keepers
should be doing that.
[1] https://scottandscottllp.com/beware-of-ibms-blue-washing/
[2] A big tip of the hat to Frank, Ike and the Thingfish.
[3] Or any combination thereof. Of course you could be just
willfully stupid but that's a given.
PS: I'm predicting either the usual cowardy snipping or
another application of the tired Freezer evasion best known as
the "Ostrich Manuever". Surprise me instead.
That's nice, dear. *pats on head*
The Ostrich maneuver.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 122:40:27 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,631 |