When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin to see.
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:44 -0800 (PST),
When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin to see.Nobody would know who Peter Caulder is except for John.
On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 6:44:23 PM UTC-8, Dick N. Witham wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:44 -0800 (PST),
When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin to see.Nobody would know who Peter Caulder is except for John.
False. Peter Caulder has a Wikipedia page, which proves his notability.
On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 6:44:23 PM UTC-8, Dick N. Witham wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:44 -0800 (PST),
When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin to see.Nobody would know who Peter Caulder is except for John.
False. Peter Caulder has a Wikipedia page, which proves his notability.
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:44 -0800 (PST),
When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin to see.Nobody would know who Peter Caulder is except for John.
But John is too sick and sweaty to be using a computer right now.
On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 9:44:23 PM UTC-5, Dick N. Witham
wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:44 -0800 (PST),
When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin toNobody would know who Peter Caulder is except for John.
see.
But John is too sick and sweaty to be using a computer right now.
He always looks that way. How does he know he's actually "sick"?
In article <58437ac8-8a4f-4057...@googlegroups.com>,
laz...@protonmail.com says...
On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 6:44:23 PM UTC-8, Dick N. Witham wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:44 -0800 (PST),
When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin to see.Nobody would know who Peter Caulder is except for John.
False. Peter Caulder has a Wikipedia page, which proves his notability.You could have one too but it will only show your downfall.
On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 7:31:30 AM UTC-8, Skeeter wrote:
In article <58437ac8-8a4f-4057...@googlegroups.com>,
laz...@protonmail.com says...
You could have one too but it will only show your downfall.
On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 6:44:23 PM UTC-8, Dick N. Witham wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:44 -0800 (PST),
When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin to see.Nobody would know who Peter Caulder is except for John.
False. Peter Caulder has a Wikipedia page, which proves his notability.
Like Peter Caulder's?
Laz Mann <laz...@protonmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 7:31:30 AM UTC-8, Skeeter wrote:
In article <58437ac8-8a4f-4057...@googlegroups.com>,
laz...@protonmail.com says...
On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 6:44:23 PM UTC-8, Dick N. Witham wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:44 -0800 (PST),
When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin to see. >>>> Nobody would know who Peter Caulder is except for John.
False. Peter Caulder has a Wikipedia page, which proves his notability. >> You could have one too but it will only show your downfall.
Like Peter Caulder's?
Notwithstanding the laughable self-assessment of John Delong’s importance, the most striking thing about this latest thread you have started in your own questionable honour, is the belief that this newsgroup was responsible for producing John, rather than any combination of nature or nurture.
Small wonder his parents felt so little pride…
On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 1:35:44 PM UTC-8, ]v[orwoo ]v[ann wrote:
Laz Mann <laz...@protonmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 7:31:30 AM UTC-8, Skeeter wrote:Notwithstanding the laughable self-assessment of John Delong’s importance, >> the most striking thing about this latest thread you have started in your
In article <58437ac8-8a4f-4057...@googlegroups.com>,
laz...@protonmail.com says...
On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 6:44:23 PM UTC-8, Dick N. Witham wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:44 -0800 (PST),
When he takes back Peter Caulder's stolen land, you'll begin to see. >>>>>> Nobody would know who Peter Caulder is except for John.
False. Peter Caulder has a Wikipedia page, which proves his notability. >>>> You could have one too but it will only show your downfall.
Like Peter Caulder's?
own questionable honour, is the belief that this newsgroup was responsible >> for producing John, rather than any combination of nature or nurture.
Small wonder his parents felt so little pride…
In what way was John not a product of rec.sport.pro-wrestling?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 102:24:27 |
| Calls: | 6,660 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,986 |