• Slate whiners, Why Every(Racist Liberal Left-winged Jerk) Hated the Sup

    From The BIG Mouth That Wrote Bad Checks@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 9 08:26:05 2016
    XPost: alt.sports.football.nfl, alt.sports.football.pro, alt.sports.football.pro.ariz-cardinals
    XPost: triangle.general

    The statistics bore out that assessment. The losing team was a
    dreadful 3-for-15 on third-down attempts. The team that won was
    an even worse 1-for-14 on those efforts. There were only 32
    first downs in the entire game, with Peyton Manning’s Broncos
    advancing the chains just 11 times on the way to victory (and
    only nine if you exclude first-downs off of penalties). The
    Broncos finished with 194 yards of total offense, the fewest of
    any Super Bowl winner ever. The game’s six turnovers were tied
    for the seventh most since 1971. The Panthers were sacked seven
    times, tying a Super Bowl record. The two teams were sacked a
    combined 12 times, also a Super Bowl record. Adding to the woes
    of Carolina’s offensive line, league MVP Cam Newton was
    pressured the most times of any game in his career. There was
    also fewer yardage gained on offensive touchdowns—a grand total
    of 3 yards on two scores—than in any previous Super Bowl. For
    its part, Denver nearly became the first team in NFL history to
    win the Super Bowl without scoring an offensive touchdown, only
    finding the end zone with a few minutes left in the game, and
    only thanks to a turnover by the Panthers near the goal line and
    a dumb holding penalty against Carolina when Denver had failed
    to convert on third-and-goal. Oh, and there were 15 punts, tied
    for the second-highest total in any Super Bowl.

    So not only did the game look atrocious on every level, it was
    also played absolutely atrociously. Unless, maybe, it wasn’t.
    The other way to look at Sunday’s game was that it was a contest
    between two of the best defenses in Super Bowl history. You
    could look at it that way, because that’s actually what
    happened. As FiveThirtyEight’s Neil Paine pointed out before the
    game, this was the third-best defensive matchup in 50 Super
    Bowls. Heading into the game, Paine described how the Broncos’
    stifling pass defense was the 11th best of any team ever in the
    Super Bowl era, according to Football Outsiders’ defense-
    adjusted value over average. So it shouldn’t have been a
    surprise when the first score of the game came after human
    wrecking ball Von Miller sprinted around Carolina tackle Mike
    Remmers and ripped the ball out of Newton’s hands, forcing a
    fumble that Malik Jackson recovered in the end zone for the
    score. At the end of the game, Miller essentially clinched the
    win for the Broncos with another extraordinary forced fumble,
    swatting the ball out of Newton’s hand in the final few minutes.
    He finished the game having collected 2.5 sacks, 6 tackles, and
    the MVP trophy. His teammates were nearly as impressive, though,
    stifling Carolina’s normally potent run and holding Newton to
    just 18 completions on 41 passing attempts. This was an
    astounding defensive performance by one of the truly astounding
    pass defenses in NFL history.

    The Panthers defense was nearly as good. As previously
    mentioned, the team held the Broncos to the lowest yardage total
    of any Super Bowl winner ever and almost prevented them from
    scoring a touchdown. If the Panthers had won, the MVP would have
    likely gone to defensive end Kony Ealy, who had three sacks, a
    forced fumble, and an interception in his first 16 snaps on the
    field. So, Carolina also lived up to its billing as one of the
    best defenses ever to play in a Super Bowl.

    Why then, was the game so aesthetically painful? The NFL
    Network’s Deion Sanders suggested what could be seen as a
    possible answer in discussing why he was one of the few
    commentators to pick the Broncos to score the upset win. “I
    would never pick against a No. 1 defense in the NFL,” he said.
    “I’m a defensive player. Most of television is former offensive
    players who [are] offensive [minded].” If what Sanders said
    about his colleagues is true, it could be that there’s a bias
    among NFL pundits toward offense that is priming viewers to care
    more about one half of the game than the other.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2016/02/why_you_ hated_the_super_bowl_this_year.html
     

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)