XPost: aus.sport.aussie-rules, aus.sport.motor, aus.sport.cricket
XPost: aus.sport.golf

IT TAKES TIME TO POLISH ANY ARGUMENT AND SO HERE IS THE NEXT REVISION...

The *MOST* *ABSTRACT* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *CLASSIFICATIONS*, *NAMELY*
*THE* *MANIFOLD* *DIFFERENTIATION* *OF* *THE* *CONCEPTS* *OF*
*SOMETHING* *AND* *NOTHING*, and accordingly from achieving a
rule-governed and necessary table (Critique, p. 292).

*THIS* *VERY* *SYSTEM*, *LIKE* *EVERY* *TRUE* *SYSTEM* *FOUNDED* *ON*
*AN* *UNIVERSAL* *PRINCIPLE* [IDEA: @326] {eg:

SELF-JUSTIFICATION:

#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST* / #123 - *JUDGEMENT*
*SENSIBILITY* AS IT'S CONVEYANCE BY THE #400 - *RATIONALITY* *OF*
*SPEECH* BEING IMPLICITLY COMPLIANT WITH A #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *PERSISTENCE* *SUBSTANCE* EFFECTING MODERATION ENABLING THE TRAVERSAL OF
THE SELF-EGO WITHIN TEMPORAL CONTINUUM AND BY WHICH THE #164 - *REVERSE* *TRANSCRIPTASE* *INHIBITOR* *PROCESS* AS ITS ONTOLOGICAL DYNAMIC
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* IS THEN KEPT WITHIN REASONABLE BOUNDS AS
22 ELEMENTS (RATIONAL PI) CONSTITUTED BY THE #41 - ONTIC PROPOSITION:
#902 - RULE OF LAW

#400 - #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *PERSISTENCE* *SUBSTANCE* = #195 - *TO* *MAINTAIN* *ONESELF*; *TO* *BE* *ESTABLISHED*, *BE* *CONFIRMED*; *TO*
*STAND*, *ENDURE*;

YOUTUBE: "Time To Say Goodbye (Andrea Bocelli, Sarah Brightman)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4L_yCwFD6Jo>

"And they took him, and brought him unto Areopagus {#236 as [#1, #100,
#5, #10, #70, #50] = Areios Pagos (G697): Areopagus}, saying, May we
know what this new doctrine, whereof thou speakest, is?" [Acts 17:19 (KJV)]

"Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' {#236 as [#1, #100, #5, #10, #70,
#50] = Areios Pagos (G697): Areopagus} hill {#236 as [#1, #100, #5, #10,
#70, #50] = Areios Pagos (G697): Areopagus}, and said, Ye men of Athens,
I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious." [Acts 17:22 (KJV)]


#400 - #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #236 - *AREUM* *JUDICIUM*
*AN* *CURIA* (*THE* *AREA* *OF* *JUDGES* / *SENATE* *OR* *MEETING*
*HOUSE*): MARS HILL ATHENS WHERE THE APOSTLE PAUL WAS NOT LED TO DEFEND
HIMSELF BEFORE JUDGES, BUT THAT HE MIGHT *SET* *FORTH* *HIS* *OPINIONS*
*ON* *DIVINE* *SUBJECTS* TO A GREATER MULTITUDE OF PEOPLE, FLOCKING
TOGETHER THERE AND EAGER TO HEAR SOMETHING NEW:

YOUTUBE: "Don't Cry for Me Argentina (Elaine Paige)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciOalICSUAo>

"For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any
twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and
spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts
and intents {#236 as [#5, #50, #50, #70, #10, #1, #50] = ennoia (G1771): intent} of the heart." [Hebrews 4:12 (KJV)]

"Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm
yourselves likewise with the same mind {#236 as [#5, #50, #50, #70, #10,
#1, #50] = ennoia (G1771): intent}: for he that hath suffered in the
flesh hath ceased from sin;" [1Peter 4:1 (KJV)]

H6965@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 24 (#29); Ego: 19 (#24),
   @3: Sup: 64 (#93); Ego: 40 (#64),
   @4: Sup: 74 (#167); Ego: 10 (#74),
   @5: Sup: 26 (#193); Ego: 33 (#107),
   Male: #193; Feme: #107
} // #195

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #195 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#195 as [#5, #100, #40, #10, #600] = quwm (H6965): {UMBRA: #8 as #195 %
#41 = #31} 1) to rise, arise, stand, rise up, stand up; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to arise; 1a2) to arise (hostile sense); 1a3) to arise, become powerful;
1a4) to arise, come on the scene; 1a5) to stand; 1a5a) to maintain
oneself; 1a5b) to be established, be confirmed; 1a5c) to stand, endure;
1a5d) to be fixed; 1a5e) to be valid; 1a5f) to be proven; 1a5g) to be fulfilled; 1a5h) to persist; 1a5i) to be set, be fixed; 1b) (Piel); 1b1)
to fulfil; 1b2) to confirm, ratify, establish, impose; 1c) (Polel) to
raise up; 1d) (Hithpael) to raise oneself, rise up; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1)
to cause to arise, raise; 1e2) to raise, set up, erect, build; 1e3) to
raise up, bring on the scene; 1e4) to raise up, rouse, stir up,
investigate; 1e5) to raise up, constitute; 1e6) to cause to stand, set, station, establish; 1e7) to make binding; 1e8) to carry out, give effect
to; 1f) (Hophal) to be raised up;

G697@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#46); Ego: 5 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#81); Ego: 10 (#35),
   @5: Sup: 24 (#105); Ego: 70 (#105),
   @6: Sup: 74 (#179); Ego: 50 (#155),
   Male: #179; Feme: #155
} // #236

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #386 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am
not one of prating tongue.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 17 (#17); Ego: 17 (#17),
   @2: Sup: 74 (#91); Ego: 57 (#74),
   @3: Sup: 70 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 77 (#151),
   @4: Sup: 76 (#237); Ego: 6 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157

#236 as [#1, #100, #5, #10, #70, #50] = Areios Pagos (G697): {UMBRA: #16
as #386 % #41 = #17} 1) a rocky height in the city of Athens, opposite
the western end of the Acropolis toward the west. This hill belonged to
(Ares) Mars and was called Mar's Hill; so called, because, as the story
went, Mars, having slain Halirrhothius, son of Neptune, for the
attempted violation of his daughter Alicippe, was tried for the murder
here before twelve gods as judges. This place was the location where the
judges convened who, by appointment of Solon, had jurisdiction of
capital offences, (as wilful murder, arson, poisoning, malicious
wounding, and breach of established religious usages). The court itself
was called Areopagus from the place where it sat, also Areum judicium an
curia. To that hill the apostle Paul was not led to defend himself
before judges, but that he might set forth his opinions on divine
subjects to a greater multitude of people, flocking together there and
eager to hear something new;

G1771@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
   @3: Sup: 24 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 50 (#105),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#97); Ego: 70 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   @5: Sup: 23 (#120); Ego: 10 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}),
   @6: Sup: 24 (#144); Ego: 1 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}),
   @7: Sup: 74 (#218); Ego: 50 (#236),
   Male: #218; Feme: #236
} // #236

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #186 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
   @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
   @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#236 as [#5, #50, #50, #70, #10, #1, #50] = ennoia (G1771): {UMBRA: #18
as #186 % #41 = #22} 1) the act of thinking, consideration, meditation;
2) a thought, notion, conception; 3) mind, understanding, will, manner
of feeling, and thinking;

}, *ALSO* *EXHIBITS* *ITS* *INESTIMABLE* *USEFULNESS* *IN* *THAT* *IT*
*EXPELS* *ALL* *THE* *EXTRANEOUS* *CONCEPTS* *THAT* *MIGHT* *OTHERWISE*
*CREEP* *IN* *AMONG* *THESE* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING*, *AND* *IT* *ASSIGNS* *EACH* *COGNITION* *ITS* *PLACE*.
Those concepts that, under the name of concepts of reflection, I had
also put into a table under the guidance of the categories mingle in
ontology with the pure concepts of the understanding without privilege
and legitimate claims, although the latter are concepts of connection
and thereby of the object itself, whereas the former are only concepts
of the mere comparison of already given concepts, and therefore have an entirely different nature and use; through my law-governed division
(Critique, p. 260) they are extricated from this amalgam.

But the usefulness of this separated table of categories shines forth
yet more brightly if, as will soon be done, we separate from the
categories the table of transcendental concepts of reason, which have a completely different nature and origin than the concepts of the
understanding (so that the table must also have a different form), a
separation that, necessary as it is, has never occurred in any system of metaphysics, as a result of which these ideas of reason and concepts of
the understanding run confusedly together as if they belonged to one
family, like siblings, an intermingling that also could never have been
avoided in the absence of a separate system of categories." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEAS: @323, @324, @325, @326, pages 74 to 78]

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#164 -
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35 - I
AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]

TOTAL: @166 + @168 + @169 + @171 + @173 + @175 + @177 + @180 + @181 +
@182 + @184 + @185 + @186 + @191 + @192 + @196 + @197 + @200 = #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x #364 IS THE 'OTH
CYCLE OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH TAKEN THIS
*COUNSEL* {

@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 -
ONTIC NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE
MERCHANTS ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE
EARTH?" [Isaiah 23:8]

DOLF @ 0620 HOURS ON 1 MARCH 2019: “It’s a rhetorical question which strikes at the very heart of Dutch Justice against the sovereign
autonomy of its people as criteria of existence:

'DO YOU WANT MORE OR LESS OF THESE FUCK KNUCKLE REPROBATE ISLAMISTS?'

By such is demanded that the weighty matter as trinomial SCALES OF
JUSTICE are firstly placed within a PROPER BALANCE by the COURT before
any consideration is determined:

#523 as [#5, #200, #300, #1, #9, #8] = histemi (G2476): {UMBRA: #35 as
#523 % #41 = #31} 1) to cause or make to stand, to place, put, set; 2)
to stand; 1a) *TO* *BID* *TO* *STAND* *BY*, [*SET* *UP*]; 1a1) *IN*
*THE* *PRESENCE* *OF* *OTHERS*, *IN* *THE* *MIDST*, *BEFORE* *JUDGES*,
before members of the Sanhedrin;; 1a2) to place; 1b) to make firm, fix establish; 1b1) to cause a person or a thing to keep his or its place;
1b2) *TO* *STAND*, *BE* *KEPT* *INTACT* (*OF* *FAMILY*, *A* *KINGDOM*),
*TO* *ESCAPE* *IN* *SAFETY*; 1b3) *TO* *ESTABLISH* *A* *THING*, *CAUSE*
*IT* *TO* *STAND*; 1b31) *TO* *UPHOLD* *OR* *SUSTAIN* *THE* *AUTHORITY*
*OR* *FORCE* *OF* *ANYTHING*; 1c) *TO* *SET* *OR* *PLACE* *IN* *A*
*BALANCE*; 1c1) to weigh: money to one (because in very early times
before the introduction of coinage, the metals used to be weighed); 2a)
to stand by or near; 2a1) to stop, stand still, to stand immovable,
stand firm; 2a1a) of the foundation of a building; 2b) to stand; 2b1) *CONTINUE* *SAFE* *AND* *SOUND*, *STAND* *UNHARMED*, *TO* *STAND*
*READY* *OR* *PREPARED*; 2b2) to be of a steadfast mind; 2b3) of
quality, one who does not hesitate, does not waiver;

And the court be not unduly prejudiced in any lesser or more degree by
the circumstance of irreconcilable dichotomies of sensibility and circumscribing reality by those which have recourse to a binomial
methodology for professing there are only two sides to a coin. My client
GEERT WILDERS is innocent of the obscenity which is here Dutch Justice.

Mangoes Rice & Cream

PS. This is a parody and such travesty is lawful when artistic merit is claimed”

DOLF @ 0620 HOURS ON 1 MARCH 2019: “The point of such goodwill as
respectful objection (ie. as then INSUBSTANTIAL GROUNDS within an
APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR AN INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER IN
CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016) made of the DUTCH
JUDICATORY'S ADVERSE DETERMINATION AGAINST POLITICIAN GEERT WILDERS
ISLAMIC DEFAMATION which we have always maintained (ie. within 24 hours
of its determinations and our intuition conveyed then has been hereby
ratified is the impost upon the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic) is against
the notional binomial dichotomy of a MORE / LESS construct is that the
regime of piety defines its nomenclature of belief as an antagonism made against autonomy itself.

Realizing that from our informal analysis made of the VOC experience
against Captain James Cook @ BATAVIA on 25 December 1770 (and later
having recourse to Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena 1783 which has cognition
of TRINOMIAL NUMBER) such antagonism against autonomy itself being in
this instance an absconded sailor, we recognize by the NATURE of the
dialog conforming to implicit and exacting CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
which itself frames our knowledge of there being a TRINOMIAL paradigm
capable by REASON of unambiguously and equitably defining SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY, that the capacity for VOC as an organisation to function with
the traditional binomial notion of STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE is in all
probability due to such TRINOMIAL PARADIGM / BINOMIAL METHODOLOGY being
capable of an orbital and sub-ordinate characteristic of STATEHOOD.

The concern over the MORE / LESS binary construct is that by there being
an implied antagonism against AUTONOMY itself as an attribution of
STATEHOOD {HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN}, it is thereby inferring a TRINOMIAL
construct and a consideration is then made in juxtaposition to a regime
of piety which defines itself by a binomial SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic
as its nomenclature against a principle of STATE which is itself defined
as a trinomial construct of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA #325: "Finally, I related
these functions of judging to objects in general, or rather to the
condition [IDEA: @324] for determining judgments as objectively valid,
and there arose pure concepts of the understanding, about which I could
have no doubt that precisely these only, and of them only so many,
*NEITHER* *MORE* *NOR* *FEWER*, can make up our entire cognition of
things out of the bare understanding. As was proper, I called them
categories, after their ancient name, whereby I reserved for myself to
append in full, under the name of predicables, all the concepts
derivable from them – whether by connecting them with one another, or
with the pure form of appearance (space and time), or with its matter,
provided the latter is not yet determined empirically (the object of
sensation in general) – just as soon as a system of transcendental
philosophy should be achieved, on behalf of which I had, at the time,
been concerned only with the critique of reason itself.

NOTE: What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or
value systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of
the world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.

Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system, or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a
meme. Just as genes carry the informational codes for our biological
DNA, these value systems supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with
“themes”) that determine our “cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking at the world that, like contagious
viruses, spread from brain to brain through word of mouth, through
media, through interaction between people. The third angel’s message is
a meme. Net ’98 was a global memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.

There are more than 6 billion people in the world today, and though we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic value systems or memes. Researchers studying this
topic have identified only eight thus far.

But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER: @1 {#1} + @2
{#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can colour-code
them (Figure A).



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>

[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are aligned]

When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).

Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented express-the-self (warm colours)
and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool colours). Note also the
differences people value the most in each system as they flow from
survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to raw power and
instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to strategies
for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to alternative
forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its natural
form (Coral).

AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING* IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL) ARE COMPLETELY HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}

The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final stage of development in
this chart or any other useful one, for the ideal that God sets before
us is “higher than the highest human thought can reach.” [Courtesy:
Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral Dynamics on How Cultural
Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist Review: 27th April 2000]

The essential thing, however, in this system of categories, by which it
is distinguished from that ancient rhapsody (which proceeded without any principle), and in virtue of which it alone deserves to be counted as philosophy, consists in this: that through it the *TRUE* *SIGNIFICATION*
*OF* *THE* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING* and the
condition of their use could be exactly determined. For here it became
apparent that the pure concepts of the understanding are, of themselves, nothing but logical functions, but that as such they do not constitute
the least concept of an object in itself but rather need sensory
intuition as a basis, and even then they serve only to determine
empirical judgments – which are otherwise undetermined and indifferent
with respect to all the functions of judging – with respect to those functions, so as to procure universal validity for these judgments, and
thereby to make judgments of experience possible in general.

This sort of insight into the nature of the categories, which would at
the same time restrict their use merely to experience, never occurred to
their first originator, or to anyone after him; but *WITHOUT* *THIS*
*INSIGHT* (*WHICH* *DEPENDS* *PRECISELY* *ON* *THEIR* *DERIVATION* *OR* *DEDUCTION*), they are completely useless and are a paltry list of
names, without explanation or rule for their use. *HAD* *ANYTHING*
*LIKE* *IT* *EVER* *OCCURRED* *TO* *THE* *ANCIENTS*, *THEN* *WITHOUT*
*DOUBT* *THE* *ENTIRE* *STUDY* *OF* *COGNITION* *THROUGH* *PURE*
*REASON*, which under the name of metaphysics has ruined so many good
minds over the centuries, would have come down to us in a *COMPLETELY* *DIFFERENT* *FORM* *AND* *WOULD* [IDEA: @325] *HAVE* *ENLIGHTENED* *THE* *HUMAN* *UNDERSTANDING*, instead of, as has actually happened,
exhausting it in murky and vain ruminations and making it unserviceable
for true science.

This system of categories now makes all treatment of any object of pure
reason itself systematic in turn, and it yields an undoubted instruction
or guiding thread as to how and through what points of inquiry any
metaphysical contemplation must be directed if it is to be complete; for
it exhausts all moments of the understanding, under which every other
concept must be brought. Thus too has arisen the table of principles, of
whose completeness we can be assured only through the system of
categories; and even in the division of concepts that are supposed to go
beyond the physiological use of the understanding (Critique, p. 344,
also p. 415), there is always the same guiding thread, which, since it
always must be taken through the same fixed points determined a priori
in the human understanding, forms a closed circle every time, leaving no
room for doubt that the object of a pure concept of the understanding or reason, insofar as it is to be examined philosophically and according to
a priori principles, can be cognized completely in this way. I have not
even been able to refrain from making use of this guide with respect to
one of the *MOST* *ABSTRACT* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *CLASSIFICATIONS*,
*NAMELY* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *DIFFERENTIATION* *OF* *THE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *SOMETHING* *AND* *NOTHING*, and accordingly from achieving a
rule-governed and necessary table (Critique, p. 292).

*THIS* *VERY* *SYSTEM*, *LIKE* *EVERY* *TRUE* *SYSTEM* *FOUNDED* *ON*
*A* *UNIVERSAL* *PRINCIPLE* [IDEA: @326] {eg: #277 - *RIGHT* *TO*
*PLACE* *A* *TEST* / #123 - *JUDGEMENT* *SENSIBILITY*}, *ALSO*
*EXHIBITS* *ITS* *INESTIMABLE* *USEFULNESS* *IN* *THAT* *IT* *EXPELS*
*ALL* *THE* *EXTRANEOUS* *CONCEPTS* *THAT* *MIGHT* *OTHERWISE* *CREEP*
*IN* *AMONG* *THESE* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, *AND*
*IT* *ASSIGNS* *EACH* *COGNITION* *ITS* *PLACE*. Those concepts that,
under the name of concepts of reflection, I had also put into a table
under the guidance of the categories mingle in ontology with the pure
concepts of the understanding without privilege and legitimate claims,
although the latter are concepts of connection and thereby of the object itself, whereas the former are only concepts of the mere comparison of
already given concepts, and therefore have an entirely different nature
and use; through my law-governed division (Critique, p. 260) they are extricated from this amalgam.

But the usefulness of this separated table of categories shines forth
yet more brightly if, as will soon be done, we separate from the
categories the table of transcendental concepts of reason, which have a completely different nature and origin than the concepts of the
understanding (so that the table must also have a different form), a
separation that, necessary as it is, has never occurred in any system of metaphysics, as a result of which these ideas of reason and concepts of
the understanding run confusedly together as if they belonged to one
family, like siblings, an intermingling that also could never have been
avoided in the absence of a separate system of categories." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEAS: @323, @324, @325, @326, pages 74 to 78]

I make the further observation that any postulation made of the binomial SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic which has an embodiment within the IDEA
#325 - *MOST* *ABSTRACT* *OF* *ONTOLOGICAL* *CLASSIFICATIONS*, *NAMELY*
*THE* *MANIFOLD* *DIFFERENTIATION* *OF* *THE* *CONCEPTS* *OF*
*SOMETHING* *AND* *NOTHING* of it being accomplished by a CANONICAL TRANSPOSITION {ie.

BINOMIAL EIGHT:

#1 + #2 = #3;
#3 + #4 = #7;
#5 + #6 = #11;
#7 + #8 = #15

AS TOTALLING #36 WITH A MAGIC SUM OF #111 / #666

ELEMENT METATHESIS OF TRANSPOSITION MADE AGAINST THE NINE ELEMENT
TRINOMIAL NUMBER AS EXHIBITING AN #65 / #260 (#64 ELEMENTS) ANALOGY AS
WITH AN #1 RETENTION

} as an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD proposition made against the SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY:

@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

In having an historical precedent as the characteristic of EUNUCHS both
in the embodiment of criminal punishment and loss of autonomy such as in
the instance of WANG FU (eunuch) during the HAN DYNASTY (206 BCE to 220
CE) which is exhibited by the story in 172 CE, when EMPRESS DOWAGER DOU
MIAO died, an unknown vandal wrote on the palace door:

'ALL THAT IS UNDER THE HEAVEN IS IN UPHEAVAL.
CAO AND WANG MURDERED THE EMPRESS DOWAGER.
THE KEY OFFICIALS ONLY KNOW HOW TO BE OFFICIALS,
AND HAD NOTHING FAITHFUL TO SAY.' [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Fu_(eunuch)>]

FROM SLAVES TO POLITICAL HEAVYWEIGHTS
Eunuchs, or 'non-men' as they could be known, first appeared in the
royal courts of ancient pre-imperial Chinese states where they were
employed as servants in the inner chambers of the palace. They were more
or less slaves and were usually acquired as children from border
territories, especially those to the south. Castrated and brought to
serve the royal household, they had no real means of altering their
lives. Eunuchs were *REGARDED* *AS* *THE* *MOST* *TRUSTWORTHY* *OF*
*SERVANTS* *BECAUSE* *THEY* *COULD* *NEITHER* *SEDUCE* *WOMEN* *OF*
*THE* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *FATHER* *CHILDREN* *WHICH* *MIGHT* *FORM* *A*
*DYNASTY* to rival that of the sitting emperor’s.

Eunuchs were powerful political players in ancient Chinese government. Originating as trusted slaves in the royal household they were ambitious
to use their favoured position to gain political power. Advising the
emperor from within the palace and blocking the access of officials to
their ruler, the eunuchs were eventually able to acquire noble titles themselves, form a bureaucracy to rival the state’s and even select and remove emperors of their choosing. Their influence on government would
result in the falling of dynasties and last right up to the 17th century CE.

Very often the eunuchs encouraged and made worse political factions,
which damaged the unity of the government. Eunuchs are charged with
playing a major part in the fall of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE).
During the 2nd century CE, in particular, a succession of weak emperors
were easily manipulated by the eunuchs at court. In 124 CE they even put
their own child candidate on the imperial throne. They gained more
imperial favour and further entrenched their position in 159 CE by
helping Emperor Huan settle a family succession dispute. In gratitude,
the emperor awarded a noble title to five leading eunuchs.

The eunuchs’ even greater power ultimately resulted in government
officials and students banding together and staging protests in 166 and
168-169 CE. The eunuchs would not be put off so lightly though and they instigated a wave of purges which saw many of those involved in the
protests imprisoned and 100 executed. The luckier officials, students,
and intellectuals who had spoken out against eunuch power were merely
excluded from ever holding public office. In 189 CE events took an even
more brutal turn. The eunuchs murdered the 'Grand General' He Jin after
it was discovered he had plotted to assemble an army to himself purge
the eunuchs. The general’s followers exacted immediate revenge by
killing all the eunuchs in the palace. With this power vacuum there then
ensued a civil war for control of the empire, with the result that the
Han fell and the Wei dynasty was established in 220 CE. [<https://www.ancient.eu/article/1109/eunuchs-in-ancient-china/>]

Thus given such a history of national identity as the capacity for
antagonisms against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY why then there should
naturally emerge from such conflicted national identity the unique
societal programs as "ONE CHILD POLICY" or "RE-EDUCATION OF UIGHUR
MUSLIMS" as not being *POGROMS* in and of themselves, but attempts to
preserve the balance of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY against any binomial
mindset onslaught.

Thus it could be argued that since the remark: "DO YOU WANT MORE / LESS"
is capable of being conveyed by a non-offensive gesticulation (the LEFT
HAND or the RIGHT HAND) of the person making the REMARK even though
referencing a specific cultural group, it does there by, give credence
to an implied immoral or unlawful impost made against the SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY which are themselves UNIVERSALLY defined by seven moral

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)