[continued from previous message]

two wives and a son, Binbeal the rainbow. His brother is Palian the bat]

} for looking after my family and I so well.

ÖRDÖG (DEVIL@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Are you pissed at OZ for whatever (real or imaginary) personal
grievances you have had?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "No, I understand their limitations, so what is the point of
getting pissed. I am well off after all, despite all machinations.

When one dedicates all one's works to God, then one can only admire the
way God works: so fine, so admirable! Now that is not something the
racist bigots will understand, for they are limited by their narrow
sectarian visions. But, they too are a part of God, not that they will understand this, so they have to play their parts in the great game around."

ÖRDÖG (DEVIL@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Believe me (or don't) there are many ways to discuss topics in
newsgroups. Some are OK some ain't. Madly trolling, ignorant comments, drifting off topic, whinging/whining, posting disgruntled rants and
alienating regular posters in your targeted newsgroup is definitely not
the right way to do it."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In this case I was simply saying that India does produce things
the world steals without giving due credit. Such as my works, and there
have been plenty more over the ages and even now. The racist bigots will ignore, then steal the new ideas from the poor thirdworlders struggling
for sheer existence."

ÖRDÖG (DEVIL@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"But feel free to try Facebook or some similar crazy social media
instead of Usenet!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I do use facebook. That is useful, for I can put in photos and
videos.

<https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359>

Usenet is useful as it is a very open medium where assertions are
forcefully challenged. So new ideas placed on usenet, such as my
inventions of the Hydrogen Transmission Network, or the Internal Force
Engine, are open to criticism. It is a test by fire, very useful. A good
way to improve, by absorbing the criticism from the public. Also it
ensures that my new inventions remain my property, at least in the moral
sense if not legal sense by patenting. That is some satisfaction.
Publicity thus has its uses. Indians at least will remember my works,
this I believe. Certainly some Australians as well, meaning my family
and my friends here."

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>

[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH /
ROMAN}}; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-WANKER@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved signature of Arindam Banerjee

[Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the f@ck,
who really knows)]"

HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.

Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
question.

— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —

"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})

TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
*ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."

YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)

<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic, but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

"THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART; SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.

AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS
HEAD, AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE
JEWS! AND THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.

PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING
HIM FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN
CAME JESUS FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND
PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!

WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM,
AND CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.

THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD
THAT SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT
HALL, AND SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.

THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?

JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.

"ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
@6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
@8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
@9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
@10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
Male: #470; Feme: #240
}

#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
#10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
#4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's)
power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to
permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care
of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) to deliver up
treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver
by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

} UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]

} THAT DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
@5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
@6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
@7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
@8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
@10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
Male: #334; Feme: #258
} // #582

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
(G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to
one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one
to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put
to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one
to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

} ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.

AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED
OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND:
WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12
(KJV)]

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry {*VISHNU*}
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction {*SHIVA*}
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression {*BRAHMA*}

YOUTUBE: “DOCTOR WHO (PARTING OF WAYS)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ThpkjDgdvY>

WHAT THEN IS A-U-M?

“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH* DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-WANKER@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
right from the beginning!

Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!

How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity'
Usenet output?

Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost
run its course."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (SCREAMING.NUTBAG@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
shite, didn't you know?."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 18 February 2019


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)