[continued from previous message]

and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression

What then is A-U-M?

“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH* DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-WANKER@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
right from the beginning!

Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!

How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity'
Usenet output?

Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost
run its course."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (SCREAMING.NUTBAG@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
shite, didn't you know?."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 18 February 2019


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)