• Rohit calls out ICC for supposed double standards in rating pitches

    From FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 4 09:42:58 2024
    XPost: uk.sport.cricket

    Rohit is right in pointing out the double standards match referees apply
    to Asian pitches vs SENA pitches or SPIN pitches vs SEAM/BOUNCY pitches.


    =====================================================================

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/rohit-calls-out-icc-for-supposed-double-standards-in-rating-pitches-hope-they-keep-their-ears-and-eyes-open-1415540

    Rohit calls out ICC for supposed double standards in rating pitches:
    'Hope they keep their ears and eyes open'

    He took aim at the match referees and the ratings some of the pitches
    received at the 2023 World Cup, held in India

    Rohit Sharma has called out the ICC and the match referees for what he
    sees as double standards at rating pitches. After winning the shortest
    Test in the history of the game, thanks to a lottery pitch loaded too
    heavily in the favour of the seam bowlers, Rohit was scathing about the
    slander against pitches in India, which don't go the distance.

    "I mean, we saw what happened in this match, how the pitch played and
    stuff like that," Rohit said. "I honestly don't mind playing on pitches
    like this. As long as everyone keeps their mouth shut in India and don't
    talk too much about Indian pitches, honestly.

    "Because you come here [in Test cricket] to challenge yourself. Yes, it
    is dangerous. It is challenging. So, and when people come to India, it
    is again pretty challenging as well. Look, when you are here to play
    Test cricket, we talk about Test cricket, the ultimate prize, Test
    cricket being the pinnacle and stuff like that. I think it's important
    that we also stand by it.

    "When you are put up against, a challenge like that, you come and face
    it. That's what happens in India, but, in India on day one, if the pitch
    starts turning, people start talking about 'Puff of dust! Puff of dust!' There's so much crack here on the pitch. People are not looking at that."

    Rohit singled out the match referees and some of the ratings pitches
    received in last year's World Cup, held in India. "I think it's
    important that we stay neutral everywhere we go," Rohit said.
    "Especially the match referees. You know, some of these match referees
    need to keep their eye on how they rate pitches. It's quite important.

    "I still can't believe that the World Cup final pitch was rated below
    average [it was rated average]. A batsman got a hundred there in the
    final. How can that be a poor pitch? So these are the things the ICC,
    the match referees, they need to look into and start rating pitches
    based on what they see, not based on the countries. I think that's quite important.

    "So I hope they keep their ears open, they keep their eyes open and look
    into those aspects of the game. Honestly, I'm all for pitches like this.
    We want to challenge playing on pitches like this. We pride ourselves
    playing on pitches like this. Uh, but all I want to say is be neutral."

    n the two-Test series that just concluded, South Africa didn't bowl any
    spin at all. India bowled only 19 overs of it in the first Test, and
    none in the second innings. That is what Rohit railed against, asking
    why a pitch that turns on day is considered inferior to one that seams.

    "Honestly, I would like to see how the pitches are rated," Rohit said.
    "I want to see that. Whatever... that chart, I would love to see it, how
    they rate the pitches, because Mumbai, Bangalore, Cape Town, Centurion,
    all different venues, overhead conditions are different. The pitches deteriorate quite fast when the sun is beating down that hard on the pitch.

    "And in India as well, we know that the conditions in India will spin
    without a doubt, but obviously people don't like it because it spins
    from day one. But that's not the point. If the ball seams from ball one,
    that's okay, right, for everyone? That's not fair. The ball starts
    spinning from ball one, it should be okay, in my opinion.

    "Otherwise, you stay neutral, and you start rating these kind of pitches
    also bad, because if you want the ball only to seam and not turn, in my opinion, that is absolutely wrong. So that's my judgement, that's my
    opinion on it. I'll stick by it because I've seen enough of cricket now
    and I've seen enough of how these match referees and the ICC looks into
    these ratings. I have no issues in how they want to rate, but stay
    neutral to everything that you do."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David North@21:1/5 to FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer on Fri Jan 5 18:02:40 2024
    XPost: uk.sport.cricket

    On 04/01/2024 17:42, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:


    Rohit is right in pointing out the double standards match referees apply
    to Asian pitches vs SENA pitches or SPIN pitches vs SEAM/BOUNCY pitches.


    =====================================================================

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/rohit-calls-out-icc-for-supposed-double-standards-in-rating-pitches-hope-they-keep-their-ears-and-eyes-open-1415540

    Rohit calls out ICC for supposed double standards in rating pitches:
    'Hope they keep their ears and eyes open'

    --snip--

    "I still can't believe that the World Cup final pitch was rated below
    average [it was rated average]. A batsman got a hundred there in the
    final. How can that be a poor pitch? So these are the things the ICC,
    the match referees, they need to look into and start rating pitches
    based on what they see, not based on the countries. I think that's quite important.

    It's also quite important to find out what rating a pitch actually got,
    rather than whingeing about a rating that it didn't get.

    --
    David North

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer@21:1/5 to David North on Fri Jan 5 10:35:46 2024
    XPost: uk.sport.cricket

    On 1/5/2024 10:02 AM, David North wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 17:42, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:


    Rohit is right in pointing out the double standards match referees
    apply to Asian pitches vs SENA pitches or SPIN pitches vs SEAM/BOUNCY
    pitches.


    =====================================================================

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/rohit-calls-out-icc-for-supposed-double-standards-in-rating-pitches-hope-they-keep-their-ears-and-eyes-open-1415540

    Rohit calls out ICC for supposed double standards in rating pitches:
    'Hope they keep their ears and eyes open'

    --snip--

    "I still can't believe that the World Cup final pitch was rated below
    average [it was rated average]. A batsman got a hundred there in the
    final. How can that be a poor pitch? So these are the things the ICC,
    the match referees, they need to look into and start rating pitches
    based on what they see, not based on the countries. I think that's
    quite important.

    It's also quite important to find out what rating a pitch actually got, rather than whingeing about a rating that it didn't get.



    It is also IMPORTANT to realize that it would be IMPOSSIBLE to REMEMBER
    every little detail about what happened two months ago.

    It's just a slip of the tongue that Rohit said below average instead of average.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hall@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 6 10:34:05 2024
    XPost: uk.sport.cricket

    In message <5942e2f2-650a-4885-9997-1b2adae7cb02@america.com>, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer <FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer@america.com>
    writes
    On 1/5/2024 10:02 AM, David North wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 17:42, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:


    Rohit is right in pointing out the double standards match referees
    apply to Asian pitches vs SENA pitches or SPIN pitches vs SEAM/BOUNCY >>>pitches.


    =====================================================================


    https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/rohit-calls-out-icc-for-supposed-do >>>uble-standards-in-rating-pitches-hope-they-keep-their-ears-and-eyes-op >>>en-1415540

    Rohit calls out ICC for supposed double standards in rating pitches: >>>'Hope they keep their ears and eyes open'
    --snip--

    "I still can't believe that the World Cup final pitch was rated
    below average [it was rated average]. A batsman got a hundred there
    in the final. How can that be a poor pitch? So these are the things
    the ICC, the match referees, they need to look into and start rating >>>pitches based on what they see, not based on the countries. I think >>>that's quite important.
    It's also quite important to find out what rating a pitch actually
    got, rather than whingeing about a rating that it didn't get.



    It is also IMPORTANT to realize that it would be IMPOSSIBLE to REMEMBER
    every little detail about what happened two months ago.

    It's just a slip of the tongue that Rohit said below average instead of >average.



    I think a slip of the tongue is inconsistent with his going on to say:
    "A batsman got a hundred there in the final. How can that be a poor
    pitch?" From that, it sounds as though he really did think that it was
    rated as below average.
    --
    John Hall
    "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
    from coughing."
    Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David North@21:1/5 to FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer on Sun Jan 7 13:15:23 2024
    XPost: uk.sport.cricket

    On 05/01/2024 18:35, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
    On 1/5/2024 10:02 AM, David North wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 17:42, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:


    Rohit is right in pointing out the double standards match referees
    apply to Asian pitches vs SENA pitches or SPIN pitches vs SEAM/BOUNCY
    pitches.


    =====================================================================

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/rohit-calls-out-icc-for-supposed-double-standards-in-rating-pitches-hope-they-keep-their-ears-and-eyes-open-1415540

    Rohit calls out ICC for supposed double standards in rating pitches:
    'Hope they keep their ears and eyes open'

    --snip--

    "I still can't believe that the World Cup final pitch was rated below
    average [it was rated average]. A batsman got a hundred there in the
    final. How can that be a poor pitch? So these are the things the ICC,
    the match referees, they need to look into and start rating pitches
    based on what they see, not based on the countries. I think that's
    quite important.

    It's also quite important to find out what rating a pitch actually
    got, rather than whingeing about a rating that it didn't get.



    It is also IMPORTANT to realize that it would be IMPOSSIBLE to REMEMBER
    every little detail about what happened two months ago.

    It's just a slip of the tongue that Rohit said below average instead of average.

    1. If he knew it was rated average, why was he complaining? What's wrong
    with average? Does he even know what average means? It means typical or
    usual or in the middle, so it ought to be the most common rating. If he
    scored his average, would he think he had had a poor day?

    2. Not only did he apparently not remember (if he ever knew) what the
    actual rating was when he said "below average", he apparently then
    forgot what he had just said, because two sentences later he had changed
    it to "poor", which is a different rating again. Some might say that his
    tongue seems to be very slippery. ;)

    --
    David North

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)