• Now we know WHY U of PA paid Lyin' Biden a MILLION BUCKS A YEAR!

    From Tommy@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 10 20:39:16 2023
    Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean beachfront - property to sell you.
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Tue Jan 10 22:06:42 2023
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote:
    Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that
    interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean
    beachfront - property to sell you. https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/
    You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have
    had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine?

    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we know for certain that
    Trump had one (or more)?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jan 11 17:38:05 2023
    On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote:
    Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that
    interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean
    beachfront - property to sell you. https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/
    You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have
    had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine?

    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we know for certain that Trump had one (or more)?

    :-)

    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Tommy on Wed Jan 11 17:39:17 2023
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote:
    Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that
    interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean beachfront - property to sell you. https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/
    You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have
    had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine?

    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we know for certain that Trump had one (or more)?

    :-)
    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.

    BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this claim.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moderate@21:1/5 to Tommy on Wed Jan 11 19:56:30 2023
    Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: > > On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > > Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden > > > Center
    was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront - property to sell you. > > > https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-
    center/ > > You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine? > > > > Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)? > > > > :-)> LOL!
    Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this claim.

    Baker lies.
    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jan 11 18:05:36 2023
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:47:21 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 17:38, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote:
    Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that
    interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean
    beachfront - property to sell you.
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/
    You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have
    had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine?

    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we know for certain that >> Trump had one (or more)?

    :-)

    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.
    Sorry, but you're trying to suggest that Biden was on someone's payroll...

    ...because UPenn received donations?

    You made the mere suggestion that Biden might have had a Chinese bank
    account a hanging offense, sunshine.

    They not only RECEIVED Chinese donations, they PAID Lyin' Biden using those same donations. This will be another subject of a Congressional investigation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Wed Jan 11 17:47:18 2023
    On 2023-01-11 17:38, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote:
    Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that
    interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean
    beachfront - property to sell you.
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/
    You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have
    had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine?

    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we know for certain that
    Trump had one (or more)?

    :-)

    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.

    Sorry, but you're trying to suggest that Biden was on someone's payroll...

    ...because UPenn received donations?

    You made the mere suggestion that Biden might have had a Chinese bank
    account a hanging offense, sunshine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Moderate on Wed Jan 11 18:47:36 2023
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:
    Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: > > On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > > Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden > > > Center
    was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront - property to sell you. > > > https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-
    center/ > > You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine? > > > > Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)? > > > > :-)> LOL!
    Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this claim.

    Baker lies.

    Are either of you denying that Trump had at least one Chinese bank account?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Wed Jan 11 18:48:21 2023
    On 2023-01-11 18:05, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:47:21 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 17:38, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote:
    Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the
    Penn-Biden Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese
    are that interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp -
    oops, I mean beachfront - property to sell you.
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/


    You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have
    had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine?

    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we know for
    certain that Trump had one (or more)?

    :-)

    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a
    bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the
    same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.
    Sorry, but you're trying to suggest that Biden was on someone's
    payroll...

    ...because UPenn received donations?

    You made the mere suggestion that Biden might have had a Chinese
    bank account a hanging offense, sunshine.

    They not only RECEIVED Chinese donations, they PAID Lyin' Biden using
    those same donations. This will be another subject of a Congressional investigation.

    You've got proof of that, do you?

    And is it something that anyone but the Murdoch-owned NY Post has?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moderate@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jan 11 21:11:31 2023
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: > > On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy
    wrote: > > > Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden > > > Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront - property to sell you.
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/ > > You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine? > > > > Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)? > > > > :-)> LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.
    BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this claim.> > Baker lies.Are either of you denying that Trump had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.
    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 11 19:13:53 2023
    T24gMjAyMy0wMS0xMSAxOToxMSwgTW9kZXJhdGUgd3JvdGU6DQo+IEFsYW4gPG51aC11aEBu b3BlLmNvbT4gV3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZToNCj4+IE9uIDIwMjMtMDEtMTEgMTc6NTYsIE1v ZGVyYXRlIHdyb3RlOj4gVG9tbXkgPHNvYXIybW9ycm93QHlhaG9vLmNvbT4gV3JvdGUgaW4g bWVzc2FnZTo+PiBPbiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIEphbnVhcnkgMTEsIDIwMjMgYXQgNTozODowNyBQ TSBVVEMtOCwgVG9tbXkgd3JvdGU6PiBPbiBUdWVzZGF5LCBKYW51YXJ5IDEwLCAyMDIzIGF0 IDEwOjA2OjQ3IFBNIFVUQy04LCBBbGFuIHdyb3RlOiA+ID4gT24gMjAyMy0wMS0xMCAyMDoz OSwgVG9tbXkgd3JvdGU6ID4gPiA+IENoaW5lc2UgZG9uYXRpb25zIHRvIHRoZSBVIG9mIFBB IFFVQURSVVBMRUQgYWZ0ZXIgdGhlIFBlbm4tQmlkZW4gPiA+ID4gQ2VudGVyIHdhcyBvcGVu ZWQuIERvIHlvdSBSRUFMTFkgdGhpbmsgdGhlIENoaW5lc2UgYXJlIHRoYXQgPiA+ID4gaW50 ZXJlc3RlZCBpbiBoaWdoZXIgZWQ/IElmIHNvLCBJIGhhdmUgc29tZSBzd2FtcCAtIG9vcHMs IEkgbWVhbiA+ID4gPiBiZWFjaGZyb250IC0gcHJvcGVydHkgdG8gc2VsbCB5b3UuID4gPiA+ IGh0dHBzOi8vbnlwb3N0LmNvbS8yMDIyLzA0LzA5LzU0bS1pbi1jaGluZXNlLWdpZnRzLWRv bmF0ZWQtdG8tdXBlbm4taG9tZS1vZi1iaWRlbi1jZW50ZXIvID4gPiBZb3UgY2xhaW1lZCBp dCB3YXMgc2lnbmlmaWNhbnQgdGhhdCBjZXJ0YWluIHBlb3BsZSBhcmUgYWxsZWdlZCB0byBo YXZlID4gPiBoYWQgQ2hpbmVzZSBiYW5rIGFjY291bnRzLCBTdW5zaGluZT8gPiA+ID4gPiBJ cyBpdCBzdGlsbCBhIHNpZ24gb2YgbmVmYXJpb3VzIHRoaW5ncyBub3cgdGhhdCB3ZSBrbm93 IGZvciBjZXJ0YWluIHRoYXQgPiA+IFRydW1wIGhhZCBvbmUgKG9yIG1vcmUpPyA+ID4gPiA+ IDotKT4gTE9MISBMZWF2ZSBpdCB1cCB0byB5b3UgdG8gY2l0ZSBhbiBJUlJFTEVWQU5UIEZB Q1QhIEhhdmluZyBIQUQgYSBiYW5rIGFjY291bnQgaW4gQ2hpbmEgaW4gb3JkZXIgdG8gZG8g bGVnYWwgYnVzaW5lc3MgSVMgTk9UIHRoZSBzYW1lIGFzIGJlaW5nIG9uIHRoZSBQQVlST0xM IG9mIHRoZSBDSElDT01zLkJUVywgeW91IEZBSUxFRCB0byBjaXRlIGEgcmVmZXJlbmNlIHZl cmlmeWluZyB0aGlzIGNsYWltLj4gPiBCYWtlciBsaWVzLkFyZSBlaXRoZXIgb2YgeW91IGRl bnlpbmcgdGhhdCBUcnVtcCBoYWQgYXQgbGVhc3Qgb25lIENoaW5lc2UgYmFuayBhY2NvdW50 Pw0KPiANCj4gQ2hhbmdlcyB0aGUgc3ViamVjdC4NCg0KQWdhaW46DQoNCklmIGl0J3MgaW1w b3J0YW50IHRoYXQgQmlkZW4gaGFzIG15dGhpY2FsIENoaW5lc2UgYWNjb3VudHMsIHdoeSBp c24ndCBpdCANCmltcG9ydGFudCB0aGF0IFRydW1wIGFjdHVhbGx5IEhBRCBzdWNoIGFjY291 bnRzPw0KDQo6LSkNCg==

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jan 11 19:33:24 2023
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: > > On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy
    wrote: > > > Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden > > > Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront - property to sell you.
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/ > > You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine? > > > > Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)? > > > > :-)> LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.
    BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this claim.> > Baker lies.Are either of you denying that Trump had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report
    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 12 17:05:25 2023
    T24gMjAyMy0wMS0xMSAxOTozMywgVG9tbXkgd3JvdGU6DQo+IE9uIFdlZG5lc2RheSwgSmFu dWFyeSAxMSwgMjAyMyBhdCA3OjEzOjU2IFBNIFVUQy04LCBBbGFuIHdyb3RlOg0KPj4gT24g MjAyMy0wMS0xMSAxOToxMSwgTW9kZXJhdGUgd3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4gQWxhbiA8bnVoLi4uQG5v cGUuY29tPiBXcm90ZSBpbiBtZXNzYWdlOg0KPj4+PiBPbiAyMDIzLTAxLTExIDE3OjU2LCBN b2RlcmF0ZSB3cm90ZTo+IFRvbW15IDxzb2FyMi4uLkB5YWhvby5jb20+IFdyb3RlIGluIG1l c3NhZ2U6Pj4gT24gV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBKYW51YXJ5IDExLCAyMDIzIGF0IDU6Mzg6MDcgUE0g VVRDLTgsIFRvbW15IHdyb3RlOj4gT24gVHVlc2RheSwgSmFudWFyeSAxMCwgMjAyMyBhdCAx MDowNjo0NyBQTSBVVEMtOCwgQWxhbiB3cm90ZTogPiA+IE9uIDIwMjMtMDEtMTAgMjA6Mzks IFRvbW15IHdyb3RlOiA+ID4gPiBDaGluZXNlIGRvbmF0aW9ucyB0byB0aGUgVSBvZiBQQSBR VUFEUlVQTEVEIGFmdGVyIHRoZSBQZW5uLUJpZGVuID4gPiA+IENlbnRlciB3YXMgb3BlbmVk LiBEbyB5b3UgUkVBTExZIHRoaW5rIHRoZSBDaGluZXNlIGFyZSB0aGF0ID4gPiA+IGludGVy ZXN0ZWQgaW4gaGlnaGVyIGVkPyBJZiBzbywgSSBoYXZlIHNvbWUgc3dhbXAgLSBvb3BzLCBJ IG1lYW4gPiA+ID4gYmVhY2hmcm9udCAtIHByb3BlcnR5IHRvIHNlbGwgeW91LiA+ID4gPiBo dHRwczovL255cG9zdC5jb20vMjAyMi8wNC8wOS81NG0taW4tY2hpbmVzZS1naWZ0cy1kb25h dGVkLXRvLXVwZW5uLWhvbWUtb2YtYmlkZW4tY2VudGVyLyA+ID4gWW91IGNsYWltZWQgaXQg d2FzIHNpZ25pZmljYW50IHRoYXQgY2VydGFpbiBwZW9wbGUgYXJlIGFsbGVnZWQgdG8gaGF2 ZSA+ID4gaGFkIENoaW5lc2UgYmFuayBhY2NvdW50cywgU3Vuc2hpbmU/ID4gPiA+ID4gSXMg aXQgc3RpbGwgYSBzaWduIG9mIG5lZmFyaW91cyB0aGluZ3Mgbm93IHRoYXQgd2Uga25vdyBm b3IgY2VydGFpbiB0aGF0ID4gPiBUcnVtcCBoYWQgb25lIChvciBtb3JlKT8gPiA+ID4gPiA6 LSk+IExPTCEgTGVhdmUgaXQgdXAgdG8geW91IHRvIGNpdGUgYW4gSVJSRUxFVkFOVCBGQUNU ISBIYXZpbmcgSEFEIGEgYmFuayBhY2NvdW50IGluIENoaW5hIGluIG9yZGVyIHRvIGRvIGxl Z2FsIGJ1c2luZXNzIElTIE5PVCB0aGUgc2FtZSBhcyBiZWluZyBvbiB0aGUgUEFZUk9MTCBv ZiB0aGUgQ0hJQ09Ncy5CVFcsIHlvdSBGQUlMRUQgdG8gY2l0ZSBhIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB2ZXJp ZnlpbmcgdGhpcyBjbGFpbS4+ID4gQmFrZXIgbGllcy5BcmUgZWl0aGVyIG9mIHlvdSBkZW55 aW5nIHRoYXQgVHJ1bXAgaGFkIGF0IGxlYXN0IG9uZSBDaGluZXNlIGJhbmsgYWNjb3VudD8N Cj4+Pg0KPj4+IENoYW5nZXMgdGhlIHN1YmplY3QuDQo+Pg0KPj4gQWdhaW46DQo+Pg0KPj4g SWYgaXQncyBpbXBvcnRhbnQgdGhhdCBCaWRlbiBoYXMgbXl0aGljYWwgQ2hpbmVzZSBhY2Nv dW50cywgd2h5IGlzbid0IGl0DQo+PiBpbXBvcnRhbnQgdGhhdCBUcnVtcCBhY3R1YWxseSBI QUQgc3VjaCBhY2NvdW50cz8NCj4+DQo+PiA6LSkNCj4gDQo+IExPTCEgTm90aGluZyAibXl0 aGljYWwiIGFib3V0IGJlaW5nIHBhaWQgTUlMTElPTlMgT0YgRE9MTEFSUyBieSBDSElOQSwg Rm9vbC4gVHJ1bXAsIG9uIHRoZSBvdGhlciBoYW5kLCB3YXMgdHJ5aW5nIHRvIGRldmVsb3Ag YnVzaW5lc3NlcyBpbiBDaGluYSwgYW5kIFBBSUQgdGF4ZXMgaW4gQ2hpbmEuDQo+IGh0dHBz Oi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS93b3JsZC8yMDIwL29jdC8yMS9kb25hbGQtdHJ1bXAt Y2hpbmEtYmFuay1hY2NvdW50LW5lYXJseS0yMDAwMDAtdGF4ZXMtcmVwb3J0DQo+IFlvdSBh cmUganVzdCB0cnlpbmcgdG8gY29uZmxhdGUgdG90YWxseSBESUZGRVJFTlQgc2l0dWF0aW9u cyBieSBpbnNpbnVhdGlvbi4gV2hhdCBhIEZVQ0tJTkcgU1VSUElTRSENCg0KU28gaWYgaGUg cGFpZCB0YXhlcy4uLg0KDQouLi5ob3cgbXVjaCB3YXMgSEUgcGFpZCwgU3Vuc2hpbmUuDQoN Ck9yIGFyZSB5b3Ugc3VnZ2VzdGluZyBoZSBtYWRlIGEgY2hhcml0YWJsZSBjb250cmlidXRp b24gdG8gQ2hpbmE/DQoNCjotKQ0KDQonVGhlIGxvbmd0aW1lIHJlYWwgZXN0YXRlIGFuZCBt ZWRpYSBtb2d1bCB3aXRoIGJ1c2luZXNzIGludGVyZXN0cyBvbiANCm11bHRpcGxlIGNvbnRp bmVudHMgd2FzIGFza2VkIGR1cmluZyBhIDIwMjAgcHJlc2lkZW50aWFsIGRlYmF0ZSBhYm91 dCANCmhhdmluZyBhIGJhbmsgYWNjb3VudCBpbiBDaGluYS4gSGUgc2FpZCBoZSBjbG9zZWQg aXQgYmVmb3JlIGhlIGJlZ2FuIGhpcyANCjIwMTYgY2FtcGFpZ24gXyBhIHN0YXRlbWVudCBo aXMgdGF4IHJldHVybnMgc2hvdyB3YXMgbm90IHRydWUuDQoNCuKAnFRoZSBiYW5rIGFjY291 bnQgd2FzIGluIDIwMTMuIEl0IHdhcyBjbG9zZWQgaW4gMjAxNSwgSSBiZWxpZXZlLOKAnSBU cnVtcCANCnNhaWQgZHVyaW5nIHRoZSBkZWJhdGUuIOKAnEkgd2FzIHRoaW5raW5nIGFib3V0 IGRvaW5nIGEgZGVhbCBpbiBDaGluYS4gDQpMaWtlIG1pbGxpb25zIG9mIG90aGVyIHBlb3Bs ZSwgSSB3YXMgdGhpbmtpbmcgYWJvdXQgaXQuIEkgZGVjaWRlZCBub3QgdG8gDQpkbyBpdC7i gJ0NCg0KVGhlIHRheCByZXR1cm5zLCBob3dldmVyLCByZXBvcnQgdGhhdCBUcnVtcCBoYWQg YSBiYW5rIGFjY291bnQgaW4gQ2hpbmEgDQppbiAyMDE1LCAyMDE2IGFuZCAyMDE3LicNCg0K J0hlIHJlcG9ydGVkICQzOCBtaWxsaW9uIGluIG92ZXJzZWFzIGdyb3NzIGluY29tZSBpbiAy MDE2IGFuZCAkNTUgDQptaWxsaW9uIGluIDIwMTcsIGZyb20gY291bnRyaWVzIGluY2x1ZGlu ZyBBemVyYmFpamFuLCBJbmRpYSwgSW5kb25lc2lhLCANClBhbmFtYSwgdGhlIFBoaWxpcHBp bmVzLCBUdXJrZXkgYW5kIHRoZSBVbml0ZWQgQXJhYiBFbWlyYXRlcy4nDQoNCkludGVyZXN0 aW5nLi4uIC4uLmlzIGZvcmVpZ24gaW5jb21lIHdlbnQgVVAgd2hpbGUgaGUgd2FzIHByZXNp ZGVudC4uLg0K

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jan 12 17:09:48 2023
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: > > On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy
    wrote: > > > Chinese donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden > > > Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront - property to sell you.
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/ > > You claimed it was significant that certain people are alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine? > > > > Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)? > > > > :-)> LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.
    BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this claim.> > Baker lies.Are either of you denying that Trump had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese accounts, why isn't it >> important that Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report
    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with business interests on multiple continents was asked during a 2020 presidential debate about
    having a bank account in China. He said he closed it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I was thinking about doing a deal in China.
    Like millions of other people, I was thinking about it. I decided not to
    do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a bank account in China
    in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income in 2016 and $55
    million in 2017, from countries including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for personal gain.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Thu Jan 12 17:13:27 2023
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy
    <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On Wednesday,
    January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > > Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have some
    swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront - property to sell
    you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/
    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)? > > > >
    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT!
    Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal
    business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the
    CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this
    claim.> > Baker lies.Are either of you denying that Trump
    had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese accounts, why
    isn't it important that Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF DOLLARS by
    CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand, was trying to develop
    businesses in China, and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report


    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with business interests
    on multiple continents was asked during a 2020 presidential debate
    about having a bank account in China. He said he closed it before
    he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement his tax returns show was
    not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in 2015, I believe,”
    Trump said during the debate. “I was thinking about doing a deal in
    China. Like millions of other people, I was thinking about it. I
    decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a bank account in
    China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income in 2016 and $55
    million in 2017, from countries including Azerbaijan, India,
    Indonesia, Panama, the Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab
    Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while he was
    president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these countries. Senile
    pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other hand, was ILLEGALLY selling
    political influence for personal gain.

    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jan 12 17:23:02 2023
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy
    <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On Wednesday,
    January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > > Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have some
    swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront - property to sell
    you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/
    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)? > > > >
    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT!
    Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal
    business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the
    CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this
    claim.> > Baker lies.Are either of you denying that Trump
    had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese accounts, why
    isn't it important that Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF DOLLARS by
    CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand, was trying to develop
    businesses in China, and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report


    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with business interests
    on multiple continents was asked during a 2020 presidential debate
    about having a bank account in China. He said he closed it before
    he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement his tax returns show was
    not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in 2015, I believe,”
    Trump said during the debate. “I was thinking about doing a deal in
    China. Like millions of other people, I was thinking about it. I
    decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a bank account in
    China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income in 2016 and $55
    million in 2017, from countries including Azerbaijan, India,
    Indonesia, Panama, the Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab
    Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while he was
    president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other hand, was ILLEGALLY selling
    political influence for personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Thu Jan 12 17:24:16 2023
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy
    <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On Wednesday,
    January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > > Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have some
    swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront - property to sell
    you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/
    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)? > > > >
    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT!
    Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal
    business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the
    CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this
    claim.> > Baker lies.Are either of you denying that Trump
    had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese accounts, why
    isn't it important that Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF DOLLARS by
    CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand, was trying to develop
    businesses in China, and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report


    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with business interests
    on multiple continents was asked during a 2020 presidential debate
    about having a bank account in China. He said he closed it before
    he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement his tax returns show was
    not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in 2015, I believe,”
    Trump said during the debate. “I was thinking about doing a deal in
    China. Like millions of other people, I was thinking about it. I
    decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a bank account in
    China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income in 2016 and $55
    million in 2017, from countries including Azerbaijan, India,
    Indonesia, Panama, the Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab
    Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while he was
    president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these countries. Senile
    pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other hand, was ILLEGALLY selling
    political influence for personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.

    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money from China.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Jan 13 21:51:05 2023
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy
    <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On Wednesday,
    January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > > Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the Penn-Biden > >>>>>>>>>> Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have some
    swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront - property to sell
    you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/
    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts, Sunshine? > >>>>>>>>>>> Is it still a sign of nefarious things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)? > > > >
    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an IRRELEVANT FACT!
    Having HAD a bank account in China in order to do legal
    business IS NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of the
    CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference verifying this
    claim.> > Baker lies.Are either of you denying that Trump
    had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese accounts, why >>>>>> isn't it important that Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF DOLLARS by
    CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand, was trying to develop
    businesses in China, and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report


    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with business interests
    on multiple continents was asked during a 2020 presidential debate
    about having a bank account in China. He said he closed it before
    he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement his tax returns show was
    not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in 2015, I believe,” >>>> Trump said during the debate. “I was thinking about doing a deal in >>>> China. Like millions of other people, I was thinking about it. I
    decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a bank account in
    China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income in 2016 and $55
    million in 2017, from countries including Azerbaijan, India,
    Indonesia, Panama, the Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab
    Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while he was
    president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these countries. Senile >>> pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other hand, was ILLEGALLY selling
    political influence for personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Fri Jan 13 23:05:24 2023
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy
    <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On
    Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8,
    Tommy wrote:> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at
    10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >
    Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the
    Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the
    Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have
    some swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront -
    property to sell you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/


    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts,
    Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now
    that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China
    in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as
    being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED
    to cite a reference verifying this claim.> > Baker
    lies.Are either of you denying that Trump had at
    least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese
    accounts, why isn't it important that Trump actually
    HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF
    DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand, was
    trying to develop businesses in China, and PAID taxes in
    China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report




    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable contribution to
    China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with business
    interests on multiple continents was asked during a 2020
    presidential debate about having a bank account in China.
    He said he closed it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a
    statement his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in 2015, I
    believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I was thinking
    about doing a deal in China. Like millions of other people,
    I was thinking about it. I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a bank
    account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income in 2016
    and $55 million in 2017, from countries including
    Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the Philippines,
    Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while he was
    president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other hand, was
    ILLEGALLY selling political influence for personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything from
    China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, electronic
    paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money from
    China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden received
    money from China via the U of PA, but here is one more for your
    enjoyment: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html

    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sat Jan 14 10:19:13 2023
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy
    <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On
    Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM
    UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On Tuesday, January 10,
    2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >
    Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the
    Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the
    Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I
    have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront
    - property to sell you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/




    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts,
    Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious things
    now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one (or
    more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite
    an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in
    China in order to do legal business IS NOT the
    same as being on the PAYROLL of the
    CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference
    verifying this claim.> > Baker lies.Are either
    of you denying that Trump had at least one
    Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese
    accounts, why isn't it important that Trump
    actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF
    DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand,
    was trying to develop businesses in China, and PAID
    taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report






    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable contribution
    to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with
    business interests on multiple continents was asked
    during a 2020 presidential debate about having a bank
    account in China. He said he closed it before he began
    his 2016 campaign _ a statement his tax returns show
    was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in 2015,
    I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I was
    thinking about doing a deal in China. Like millions of
    other people, I was thinking about it. I decided not to
    do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a bank
    account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income in
    2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries including
    Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the Philippines,
    Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while he
    was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other hand,
    was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for personal
    gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything from
    China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers,
    electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money from
    China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden
    received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one more
    for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html


    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations proceed.
    Stay TUNED!

    That's what you said about Clinton.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Jan 14 10:16:40 2023
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy
    <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On
    Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8,
    Tommy wrote:> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at
    10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >
    Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the
    Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the
    Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I have
    some swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront -
    property to sell you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/


    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts,
    Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious things now
    that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in China
    in order to do legal business IS NOT the same as
    being on the PAYROLL of the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED
    to cite a reference verifying this claim.> > Baker
    lies.Are either of you denying that Trump had at
    least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese
    accounts, why isn't it important that Trump actually
    HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF
    DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand, was
    trying to develop businesses in China, and PAID taxes in
    China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report




    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable contribution to
    China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with business
    interests on multiple continents was asked during a 2020
    presidential debate about having a bank account in China.
    He said he closed it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a
    statement his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in 2015, I
    believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I was thinking
    about doing a deal in China. Like millions of other people,
    I was thinking about it. I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a bank
    account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income in 2016
    and $55 million in 2017, from countries including
    Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the Philippines,
    Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while he was
    president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other hand, was
    ILLEGALLY selling political influence for personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything from
    China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, electronic
    paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money from
    China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden received
    money from China via the U of PA, but here is one more for your
    enjoyment: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html
    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the Republicans form all of the committees and investigations proceed. Stay TUNED!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Jan 16 22:31:56 2023
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM UTC-8,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> Tommy
    <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> On
    Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 5:38:07 PM
    UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On Tuesday, January 10,
    2023 at 10:06:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >
    Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after the
    Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think the
    Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, I
    have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > beachfront
    - property to sell you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/




    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank accounts,
    Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious things
    now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one (or
    more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to cite
    an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account in
    China in order to do legal business IS NOT the
    same as being on the PAYROLL of the
    CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a reference
    verifying this claim.> > Baker lies.Are either
    of you denying that Trump had at least one
    Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical Chinese
    accounts, why isn't it important that Trump
    actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS OF
    DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other hand,
    was trying to develop businesses in China, and PAID
    taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report






    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable contribution
    to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with
    business interests on multiple continents was asked
    during a 2020 presidential debate about having a bank
    account in China. He said he closed it before he began
    his 2016 campaign _ a statement his tax returns show
    was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in 2015,
    I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I was
    thinking about doing a deal in China. Like millions of
    other people, I was thinking about it. I decided not to
    do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a bank
    account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income in
    2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries including
    Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the Philippines,
    Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while he
    was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other hand,
    was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for personal
    gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything from
    China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers,
    electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money from
    China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden
    received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one more
    for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html


    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations proceed.
    Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they would have to prosecute.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Jan 16 22:40:26 2023
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:>
    Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in
    message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023
    at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > >
    Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after
    the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think
    the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so,
    I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > >
    beachfront - property to sell you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank
    accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one
    (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to
    cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account
    in China in order to do legal business IS
    NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of
    the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a
    reference verifying this claim.> > Baker
    lies.Are either of you denying that Trump
    had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical
    Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that
    Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS
    OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other
    hand, was trying to develop businesses in China,
    and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable
    contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with
    business interests on multiple continents was
    asked during a 2020 presidential debate about
    having a bank account in China. He said he closed
    it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement
    his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in
    2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I
    was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like
    millions of other people, I was thinking about it.
    I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a
    bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income
    in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries
    including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the
    Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while
    he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other
    hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for
    personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything
    from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers,
    electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money
    from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden
    received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one
    more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations
    proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.

    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Jan 16 23:12:59 2023
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:>
    Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in
    message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023
    at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > >
    Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after
    the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think
    the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so,
    I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > >
    beachfront - property to sell you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank
    accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one
    (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to
    cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account
    in China in order to do legal business IS
    NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of
    the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a
    reference verifying this claim.> > Baker
    lies.Are either of you denying that Trump
    had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical
    Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that
    Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS
    OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other
    hand, was trying to develop businesses in China,
    and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable
    contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with
    business interests on multiple continents was
    asked during a 2020 presidential debate about
    having a bank account in China. He said he closed
    it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement
    his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in
    2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I
    was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like
    millions of other people, I was thinking about it.
    I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a
    bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income
    in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries
    including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the
    Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while
    he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other
    hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for
    personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything
    from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers,
    electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money
    from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden
    received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one
    more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations
    proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From One Putt@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 17 12:52:15 2023
    On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 23:05:24 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden received
    money from China via the U of PA, but here is one more for your
    enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html

    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    Obviously you didn't read past the headline.

    "Hunter Biden's former business partner is ready to testify with
    thousands of new call recordings, text messages, photos, emails and
    documents to a congressional probe investigating the First Son if
    the Republicans win the House, sources told DailyMail.com."

    "If the Republicans win the House". The newly elected republican
    congress wasn't seated until January 3rd of this year and since it
    takes time to assemble a congressional probe it's easy to understand
    why he hasn't testified yet.

    Surely an expert on time criteria such as yourself should have known
    this.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Tue Jan 17 15:45:35 2023
    On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:>
    Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in
    message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023
    at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > >
    Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after
    the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think
    the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so,
    I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > >
    beachfront - property to sell you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank
    accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one
    (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to
    cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account
    in China in order to do legal business IS
    NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of
    the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a
    reference verifying this claim.> > Baker
    lies.Are either of you denying that Trump
    had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical
    Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that
    Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS
    OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other
    hand, was trying to develop businesses in China,
    and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable
    contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with
    business interests on multiple continents was
    asked during a 2020 presidential debate about
    having a bank account in China. He said he closed
    it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement
    his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in
    2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like
    millions of other people, I was thinking about it.
    I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a
    bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income
    in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries
    including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the
    Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while
    he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other
    hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for
    personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything
    from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers,
    electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money
    from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden
    received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one
    more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations
    proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?

    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jan 18 21:29:26 2023
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:>
    Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in
    message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023
    at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > >
    Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after
    the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think
    the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so,
    I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > >
    beachfront - property to sell you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank
    accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one
    (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to
    cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account
    in China in order to do legal business IS
    NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of
    the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a
    reference verifying this claim.> > Baker
    lies.Are either of you denying that Trump
    had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical
    Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that
    Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other
    hand, was trying to develop businesses in China,
    and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable
    contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with
    business interests on multiple continents was
    asked during a 2020 presidential debate about
    having a bank account in China. He said he closed
    it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement
    his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in
    2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like
    millions of other people, I was thinking about it.
    I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a
    bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income
    in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries
    including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while
    he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other
    hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for
    personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything
    from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers,
    electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money
    from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden
    received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one
    more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations
    proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Wed Jan 18 21:46:44 2023
    On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
    On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:>
    Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in
    message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023
    at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after
    the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > >
    beachfront - property to sell you. > > >
    https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are
    alleged to have > > had Chinese bank
    accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one
    (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to
    cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS
    NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of
    the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a
    reference verifying this claim.> > Baker
    lies.Are either of you denying that Trump
    had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical
    Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that
    Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other
    hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable
    contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with
    business interests on multiple continents was
    asked during a 2020 presidential debate about
    having a bank account in China. He said he closed
    it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in
    2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like
    millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a
    bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income
    in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries
    including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while
    he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other
    hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for
    personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything
    from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers,
    electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money
    from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden
    received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one
    more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations
    proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG. >>
    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.

    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying
    charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jan 25 17:52:02 2023
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM
    UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:>
    Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in
    message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > >
    beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank
    accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a
    reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical
    Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable
    contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with
    business interests on multiple continents was
    asked during a 2020 presidential debate about
    having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like
    millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.'

    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations
    proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose >>>>> not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they >>>>> could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you? >> Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Wed Jan 25 19:47:53 2023
    On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:>
    Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in
    message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank
    accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious
    things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a
    reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account?

    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical
    Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable
    contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was
    asked during a 2020 presidential debate about
    having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations
    proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose >>>>>>> not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they >>>>>>> could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they >>>>>>> would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you? >>>> Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that >>>> power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying
    charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.

    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any
    steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Jan 30 23:00:41 2023
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable
    contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it? >>>>>>>>>
    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose >>>>>>> not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they >>>>>>> could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they >>>>>>> would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that >>>> power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying
    charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Jan 30 23:13:28 2023
    On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote:
    Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine?

    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it? >>>>>>>>>>>
    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose >>>>>>>>> not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they >>>>>>>>> could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they >>>>>>>>> would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you? >>>>>> Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that >>>>>> power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying >>>> charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get >>>> to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any
    steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.

    We know what steps they didn't take...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Feb 1 20:31:25 2023
    On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it? >>>>>>>>>>>
    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they >>>>>>>>> would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final >>>>>> decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying >>>> charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get >>>> to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any >> steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.
    We know what steps they didn't take...

    Which are?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Wed Feb 1 21:42:24 2023
    On 2023-02-01 20:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts?

    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE!
    So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses.
    Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something".

    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose >>>>>>>>>>> not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they >>>>>>>>>>> could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they >>>>>>>>>>> would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final >>>>>>>> decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that >>>>>>>> power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying >>>>>> charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get >>>>>> to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any >>>> steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.
    We know what steps they didn't take...

    Which are?

    They didn't empanel a grand jury.

    They didn't bring any charges.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Feb 2 21:47:20 2023
    On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:42:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-01 20:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine.

    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true.

    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they >>>>>>>>>>> would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final >>>>>>>> decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying
    charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any >>>> steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.
    We know what steps they didn't take...

    Which are?
    They didn't empanel a grand jury.

    They didn't bring any charges.

    Yet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Fri Feb 3 01:24:27 2023
    On 2023-02-02 21:47, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:42:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-01 20:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? >
    Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they >>>>>>>>>>>>> would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final >>>>>>>>>> decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying >>>>>>>> charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get >>>>>>>> to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any >>>>>> steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.
    We know what steps they didn't take...

    Which are?
    They didn't empanel a grand jury.

    They didn't bring any charges.

    Yet

    It's been more than 4 years.

    Are you going on the record that the AG is going to bring charges
    against Clinton?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Feb 4 21:55:12 2023
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:24:30 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:47, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:42:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-01 20:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I
    was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final >>>>>>>>>> decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying
    charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any
    steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.
    We know what steps they didn't take...

    Which are?
    They didn't empanel a grand jury.

    They didn't bring any charges.

    Yet
    It's been more than 4 years.

    Are you going on the record that the AG is going to bring charges
    against Clinton?

    Who knows, Fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sat Feb 4 22:11:37 2023
    On 2023-02-04 21:55, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:24:30 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:47, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:42:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-01 20:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we
    know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final >>>>>>>>>>>> decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying
    charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any
    steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.
    We know what steps they didn't take...

    Which are?
    They didn't empanel a grand jury.

    They didn't bring any charges.

    Yet
    It's been more than 4 years.

    Are you going on the record that the AG is going to bring charges
    against Clinton?

    Who knows, Fool.

    So you're not willing to take a stand.

    Got it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Feb 6 22:05:21 2023
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:11:40 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:55, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:24:30 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:47, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:42:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-01 20:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden >
    Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I
    was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.”

    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden
    received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one
    more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying
    charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any
    steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.
    We know what steps they didn't take...

    Which are?
    They didn't empanel a grand jury.

    They didn't bring any charges.

    Yet
    It's been more than 4 years.

    Are you going on the record that the AG is going to bring charges
    against Clinton?

    Who knows, Fool.
    So you're not willing to take a stand.

    Got it.

    The bottom line is that senile pervert is BOUGHT and PAID FOR by the CHICOMs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Feb 6 22:21:39 2023
    On 2023-02-06 22:05, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:11:40 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:55, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:24:30 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:47, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:42:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-01 20:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are
    that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject.

    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his tax returns show was not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I
    was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided not to do it.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronic paper trails and eye witnesses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one
    more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans form all of the committees and investigations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying
    charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any
    steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.
    We know what steps they didn't take...

    Which are?
    They didn't empanel a grand jury.

    They didn't bring any charges.

    Yet
    It's been more than 4 years.

    Are you going on the record that the AG is going to bring charges
    against Clinton?

    Who knows, Fool.
    So you're not willing to take a stand.

    Got it.

    The bottom line is that senile pervert is BOUGHT and PAID FOR by the CHICOMs.

    Nope.

    The bottom line is that you want to believe that...

    ...at the same time that we KNOW that Trump had a Chinese bank account.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Feb 7 21:09:49 2023
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:21:42 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:05, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:11:40 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:55, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:24:30 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:47, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:42:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-01 20:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:13:31 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-30 23:00, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:47:56 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:52, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 9:46:47 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-18 21:29, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 23:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:40:29 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-16 22:31, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 10:19:16 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-14 10:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:05:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-13 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:24:18 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:23, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-01-12 17:09, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:05:28 PM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:33, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 7:13:56 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-01-11 19:11, Moderate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-11 17:56, Moderate wrote:> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message:>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 5:38:07 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:> On >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:06:47 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-10 20:39, Tommy wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese
    donations to the U of PA QUADRUPLED after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Penn-Biden > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center was opened. Do you REALLY think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chinese are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > > interested in higher ed? If so, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some swamp - oops, I mean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beachfront - property to sell you. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/04/09/54m-in-chinese-gifts-donated-to-upenn-home-of-biden-center/






    You claimed it was significant that certain people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged to have > > had Chinese bank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts, Sunshine? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it still a sign of nefarious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things now that we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know for certain that > > Trump had one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or more)?
    LOL! Leave it up to you to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cite an
    IRRELEVANT FACT! Having HAD a bank account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China in order to do legal business IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT the same as being on the PAYROLL of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CHICOMs.BTW, you FAILED to cite a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference verifying this claim.> > Baker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lies.Are either of you denying that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had at least one Chinese bank account? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Changes the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Again:

    If it's important that Biden has mythical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese accounts, why isn't it important that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump actually HAD such accounts? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    :-)

    LOL! Nothing "mythical" about being paid MILLIONS
    OF DOLLARS by CHINA, Fool. Trump, on the other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand, was trying to develop businesses in China, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and PAID taxes in China. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report








    You are just trying to conflate totally DIFFERENT situations by
    insinuation. What a FUCKING SURPISE! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if he paid taxes...

    ...how much was HE paid, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Or are you suggesting he made a charitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to China?

    :-)

    'The longtime real estate and media mogul with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business interests on multiple continents was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked during a 2020 presidential debate about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having a bank account in China. He said he closed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it before he began his 2016 campaign _ a statement
    his tax returns show was not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    “The bank account was in 2013. It was closed in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015, I believe,” Trump said during the debate. “I
    was thinking about doing a deal in China. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of other people, I was thinking about it.
    I decided not to do it.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    The tax returns, however, report that Trump had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bank account in China in 2015, 2016 and 2017.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    'He reported $38 million in overseas gross income >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016 and $55 million in 2017, from countries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including Azerbaijan, India, Indonesia, Panama, the
    Philippines, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.'

    Interesting... ...is foreign income went UP while >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was president...

    LOL! Trump was conducting LEGAL businesses in these
    countries. Senile pervert Lyin' Biden, on the other
    hand, was ILLEGALLY selling political influence for
    personal gain.
    And did your psychic tell you this, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    You can't even show that Biden ever received anything
    from China.

    We know that Trump did...

    ...while he was president.

    No, there is extensive documentation, wire transfers,
    electronic paper trails and eye witnesses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Present one.

    Just one thing that shows that Biden received any money
    from China.

    Hey, I ALREADY showed you that senile pervert Lyin' Biden
    received money from China via the U of PA, but here is one
    more for your enjoyment:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11378223/Hunter-Bidens-ex-business-partner-set-testify-explosive-trove-documents.html




    "set to" do something isn't "has done something". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    That was more than two months ago and what has come of it?

    I think that PLENTY of things are "set" to happen once the
    Republicans form all of the committees and investigations
    proceed. Stay TUNED!
    That's what you said about Clinton.

    Shrillary was PROVEN to have violated numerous laws but Comey chose
    not to prosecute (no surprise there). They must have concluded they
    could never get a conviction of Shrillary in the venue that they
    would have to prosecute.
    LOL!

    Riiiiiiiight.

    Yup, that's RIGHT! You DID watch Comey's performance on TV, didn't you?
    Nope.

    I read.

    You should try it.

    For instance:

    As director of the FBI, James Comey doesn't get to make the final
    decision about who is or is not prosecuted. That would be the job of the AG.

    If Trump's AG had wanted to bring charges against Clinton, he had that
    power; indeed the OBLIGATION to bring charges.

    So why didn't he?

    :-)

    I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you.
    You're the one claiming that the FBI is the one responsible for laying
    charges, Sunshine.

    The fact is that TRUMP's AG didn't convene a grand jury, let alone get
    to getting charges filed.

    I repeat, I can't speak for the AG and NEITHER can you. >>>>>>>>>> But you agree that after all the investigations, the AG didn't take any
    steps to charge Clinton with any crime.

    I have no idea what "steps" the AG took, Fool.
    We know what steps they didn't take...

    Which are?
    They didn't empanel a grand jury.

    They didn't bring any charges.

    Yet
    It's been more than 4 years.

    Are you going on the record that the AG is going to bring charges
    against Clinton?

    Who knows, Fool.
    So you're not willing to take a stand.

    Got it.

    The bottom line is that senile pervert is BOUGHT and PAID FOR by the CHICOMs.
    Nope.

    The bottom line is that you want to believe that...

    ...at the same time that we KNOW that Trump had a Chinese bank account.

    :-)

    LOL! Lyin' Biden and Hunter BooBoo received MILLIONS from the Chinese, whereas Trump did a minor amount of business in China that led to NOTHING.

    We will learn MUCH MORE about the Lyin' Biden/CHICOM connection as the House investigations proceed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Wed Feb 8 16:08:01 2023
    On 2023-02-07 21:09, Tommy wrote:
    The bottom line is that senile pervert is BOUGHT and PAID FOR by
    the CHICOMs.
    Nope.

    The bottom line is that you want to believe that...

    ...at the same time that we KNOW that Trump had a Chinese bank
    account.

    😄
    LOL! Lyin' Biden and Hunter BooBoo received MILLIONS from the
    Chinese, whereas Trump did a minor amount of business in China that
    led to NOTHING.

    Sorry, but you have literally no proof of either of them receving
    millions...

    ...despite them both being private citizens when you allege it happened...

    ...and there is incontrovertible evidence that Trump was making money
    from China...

    ...and lying about it...

    ...while he was president.


    We will learn MUCH MORE about the Lyin' Biden/CHICOM connection as
    the House investigations proceed.

    I'll bet you they can't produce a single thing that is against the law
    from it.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Feb 9 22:54:29 2023
    On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 4:08:04 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-07 21:09, Tommy wrote:
    The bottom line is that senile pervert is BOUGHT and PAID FOR by
    the CHICOMs.
    Nope.

    The bottom line is that you want to believe that...

    ...at the same time that we KNOW that Trump had a Chinese bank
    account.

    😄
    LOL! Lyin' Biden and Hunter BooBoo received MILLIONS from the
    Chinese, whereas Trump did a minor amount of business in China that
    led to NOTHING.
    Sorry, but you have literally no proof of either of them receving millions...

    ...despite them both being private citizens when you allege it happened...

    ...and there is incontrovertible evidence that Trump was making money
    from China...

    ...and lying about it...

    ...while he was president.

    We will learn MUCH MORE about the Lyin' Biden/CHICOM connection as
    the House investigations proceed.
    I'll bet you they can't produce a single thing that is against the law
    from it.

    :-)

    LOL! How about SIX HUNDRED AND FORTY FOUR PAGES of crimes? https://www.independentsentinel.com/the-644-page-marco-polo-report-on-the-hunter-biden-laptop/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Fri Feb 10 01:27:31 2023
    On 2023-02-09 22:54, Tommy wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 4:08:04 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-07 21:09, Tommy wrote:
    The bottom line is that senile pervert is BOUGHT and PAID FOR by
    the CHICOMs.
    Nope.

    The bottom line is that you want to believe that...

    ...at the same time that we KNOW that Trump had a Chinese bank
    account.

    😄
    LOL! Lyin' Biden and Hunter BooBoo received MILLIONS from the
    Chinese, whereas Trump did a minor amount of business in China that
    led to NOTHING.
    Sorry, but you have literally no proof of either of them receving
    millions...

    ...despite them both being private citizens when you allege it happened... >>
    ...and there is incontrovertible evidence that Trump was making money
    from China...

    ...and lying about it...

    ...while he was president.

    We will learn MUCH MORE about the Lyin' Biden/CHICOM connection as
    the House investigations proceed.
    I'll bet you they can't produce a single thing that is against the law
    from it.

    :-)

    LOL! How about SIX HUNDRED AND FORTY FOUR PAGES of crimes? https://www.independentsentinel.com/the-644-page-marco-polo-report-on-the-hunter-biden-laptop/

    That's how you avoid actually producing a single claim, Sunshine.

    Pick the one you think is strongest.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)