and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Tommy wrote:
[snipped presumed lies]
Just have to say how amusing it is that the demented old pervert has
reverted to the childhood version of his name; how many months 'til he reverts to Tomsie Womsie.
On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:11:34 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
[snipped presumed lies]
Just have to say how amusing it is that the demented old pervert
has reverted to the childhood version of his name; how many months
'til he reverts to Tomsie Womsie.
Hey BirdBrain,
glad you noticed - my golf buddies affectionately
refer to me as "Tommy," and is used by my closest friends. Since that
is also how the libtards refer to me on RSG I thought it to be less
confusing to others that I change my display name.
Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:11:34 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
[snipped presumed lies]
Just have to say how amusing it is that the demented old pervert
has reverted to the childhood version of his name; how many months
'til he reverts to Tomsie Womsie.
Hey BirdBrain,Hey Lizard faced cunt,
glad you noticed - my golf buddies affectionatelySo your "golfing buddies" think you behave like a child as well;
refer to me as "Tommy," and is used by my closest friends. Since that
is also how the libtards refer to me on RSG I thought it to be less confusing to others that I change my display name.
unsurprised.
You are such a demented old pervert, Tomsy Womsy.
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 12:37:00 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:11:34 PM UTC-7, Bigbird
wrote:
Tommy wrote:
[snipped presumed lies]
Just have to say how amusing it is that the demented old
pervert has reverted to the childhood version of his name; how
many months 'til he reverts to Tomsie Womsie.
Hey BirdBrain,Hey Lizard faced cunt,
glad you noticed - my golf buddies affectionatelySo your "golfing buddies" think you behave like a child as well; unsurprised.
refer to me as "Tommy," and is used by my closest friends. Since
that is also how the libtards refer to me on RSG I thought it to
be less confusing to others that I change my display name.
You are such a demented old pervert, Tomsy Womsy.
YAAAAWWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN....
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:57:29 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!Oh, so it wasn’t four Republican Senators, but just two who advocated to abolish both?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Because that “both” requirement is why they didn’t include Senator Lee:
< https://twitter.com/dwuhlfelderlaw/status/1588139132034945025?s=61&t=MAO9hzhk2SkybrziuyUueQ>
-hh
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:33:26 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:57:29 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Oh, so it wasn’t four Republican Senators, but just two who advocated to abolish both?
Because that “both” requirement is why they didn’t include Senator Lee:
< https://twitter.com/dwuhlfelderlaw/status/1588139132034945025?s=61&t=MAO9hzhk2SkybrziuyUueQ>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, is the WaPo, your libtard bible, WRONG?
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 1:24:32 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:33:26 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:57:29 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Oh, so it wasn’t four Republican Senators, but just two who advocated to abolish both?
Because that “both” requirement is why they didn’t include Senator Lee:
< https://twitter.com/dwuhlfelderlaw/status/1588139132034945025?s=61&t=MAO9hzhk2SkybrziuyUueQ>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, is the WaPo, your libtard bible, WRONG?Nope, and not what I said: the WP's fact-check was that there were fewer Republicans
unequivocally advocating to abolish SS/MC then had been reported.
That doesn't mean that there's no Republicans unequivocally advocating to kill SS or MC,
as the video clip I provided of another Republican Senator (SEN Lee) proves.
The bottom line is that Business would love to no longer have to pay their share of Social
Security (6.2%) or Medicare taxes (1.45%) and Republicans in particular are eager to try
to garner their campaign contribution donations by promising them to do that, regardless
of the adverse consequences on the general public.
-hh
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 2:44:50 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 1:24:32 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:33:26 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:57:29 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Oh, so it wasn’t four Republican Senators, but just two who advocated to abolish both?
Because that “both” requirement is why they didn’t include Senator Lee:
< https://twitter.com/dwuhlfelderlaw/status/1588139132034945025?s=61&t=MAO9hzhk2SkybrziuyUueQ>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, is the WaPo, your libtard bible, WRONG?Nope, and not what I said: the WP's fact-check was that there were fewer Republicans
unequivocally advocating to abolish SS/MC then had been reported.
That doesn't mean that there's no Republicans unequivocally advocating to kill SS or MC,
as the video clip I provided of another Republican Senator (SEN Lee) proves.
The bottom line is that Business would love to no longer have to pay their share of Social
Security (6.2%) or Medicare taxes (1.45%) and Republicans in particular are eager to try
to garner their campaign contribution donations by promising them to do that, regardless
of the adverse consequences on the general public.
The Bottom Line is that the Dims are LYING when they claim that Republicans want to
abolish Social Security and Medicare, which would be political SUICIDE.
What they want is to shore up its financial solvency, which IS in doubt. Just read the SS Trustee Report:
https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2021/
Don't bother responding UNTIL you have actually READ this report.
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 2:44:50 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 1:24:32 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:33:26 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:57:29 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Oh, so it wasn’t four Republican Senators, but just two who advocated to abolish both?
Because that “both” requirement is why they didn’t include Senator Lee:
< https://twitter.com/dwuhlfelderlaw/status/1588139132034945025?s=61&t=MAO9hzhk2SkybrziuyUueQ>
Trustee Report:Hey Lyin' Asshole, is the WaPo, your libtard bible, WRONG?Nope, and not what I said: the WP's fact-check was that there were fewer Republicans
unequivocally advocating to abolish SS/MC then had been reported.
That doesn't mean that there's no Republicans unequivocally advocating to kill SS or MC,
as the video clip I provided of another Republican Senator (SEN Lee) proves.
The bottom line is that Business would love to no longer have to pay their share of Social
Security (6.2%) or Medicare taxes (1.45%) and Republicans in particular are eager to try
to garner their campaign contribution donations by promising them to do that, regardless
of the adverse consequences on the general public.
-hhThe Bottom Line is that the Dims are LYING when they claim that Republicans want to abolish Social Security and Medicare, which would be political SUICIDE. What they want is to shore up its financial solvency, which IS in doubt. Just read the SS
https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2021/
Don't bother responding UNTIL you have actually READ this report.
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 4:02:56 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 2:44:50 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 1:24:32 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:33:26 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:57:29 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Oh, so it wasn’t four Republican Senators, but just two who advocated to abolish both?
Because that “both” requirement is why they didn’t include Senator Lee:
< https://twitter.com/dwuhlfelderlaw/status/1588139132034945025?s=61&t=MAO9hzhk2SkybrziuyUueQ>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, is the WaPo, your libtard bible, WRONG?Nope, and not what I said: the WP's fact-check was that there were fewer Republicans
unequivocally advocating to abolish SS/MC then had been reported.
That doesn't mean that there's no Republicans unequivocally advocating to kill SS or MC,
as the video clip I provided of another Republican Senator (SEN Lee) proves.
The bottom line is that Business would love to no longer have to pay their share of Social
Security (6.2%) or Medicare taxes (1.45%) and Republicans in particular are eager to try
to garner their campaign contribution donations by promising them to do that, regardless
of the adverse consequences on the general public.
The Bottom Line is that the Dims are LYING when they claim that Republicans want toWell, as per the above, some do want to abolish both, and others (Lee) want to abolish
abolish Social Security and Medicare, which would be political SUICIDE.
at least Social Security, so how is it “suicide” for him when his statement got cheers?
What they want is to shore up its financial solvency, which IS in doubt. Just read the SS Trustee Report:Oh, I know of the SS solvency challenges; it’s partly why I excluded SS when I’d
https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2021/
Don't bother responding UNTIL you have actually READ this report.
mentioned the robustness of my planned guaranteed retirement income stream.
In any event, just what have the above mentioned Republicans have stated as their plan to restore the financial solvency of SS? Be specific, and provide the
URLs for the documentation thereof…and don’t reply without them, because doing so reinforces what they’ve said that their goal is to defund SS and/or MC.
-hh
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 5:43:27 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 4:02:56 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 2:44:50 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 1:24:32 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:33:26 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:57:29 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Oh, so it wasn’t four Republican Senators, but just two who advocated to abolish both?
Because that “both” requirement is why they didn’t include Senator Lee:
< https://twitter.com/dwuhlfelderlaw/status/1588139132034945025?s=61&t=MAO9hzhk2SkybrziuyUueQ>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, is the WaPo, your libtard bible, WRONG?Nope, and not what I said: the WP's fact-check was that there were fewer Republicans
unequivocally advocating to abolish SS/MC then had been reported.
That doesn't mean that there's no Republicans unequivocally advocating to kill SS or MC,
as the video clip I provided of another Republican Senator (SEN Lee) proves.
The bottom line is that Business would love to no longer have to pay their share of Social
Security (6.2%) or Medicare taxes (1.45%) and Republicans in particular are eager to try
to garner their campaign contribution donations by promising them to do that, regardless
of the adverse consequences on the general public.
The Bottom Line is that the Dims are LYING when they claim that Republicans want toWell, as per the above, some do want to abolish both, and others (Lee) want to abolish
abolish Social Security and Medicare, which would be political SUICIDE.
at least Social Security, so how is it “suicide” for him when his statement got cheers?
What they want is to shore up its financial solvency, which IS in doubt. Just read the SS Trustee Report:Oh, I know of the SS solvency challenges; it’s partly why I excluded SS when I’d
https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2021/
Don't bother responding UNTIL you have actually READ this report.
mentioned the robustness of my planned guaranteed retirement income stream.
In any event, just what have the above mentioned Republicans have stated as
their plan to restore the financial solvency of SS? Be specific, and provide the
URLs for the documentation thereof…and don’t reply without them, because
doing so reinforces what they’ve said that their goal is to defund SS and/or MC.
-hhThe most obvious change is to gradually increase the retirement age.
On Monday, November 7, 2022 at 8:21:42 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 5:43:27 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
...Oh, I know of the SS solvency challenges; it’s partly why I excluded SS when I’d
mentioned the robustness of my planned guaranteed retirement income stream.
In any event, just what have the above mentioned Republicans have stated as
their plan to restore the financial solvency of SS? Be specific, and provide the
URLs for the documentation thereof…and don’t reply without them, because
doing so reinforces what they’ve said that their goal is to defund SS and/or MC.
The most obvious change is to gradually increase the retirement age.Funny, NONE of the libtards ever responded to this!
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:24:48 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, November 7, 2022 at 8:21:42 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 5:43:27 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Funny, NONE of the libtards ever responded to this!
...Oh, I know of the SS solvency challenges; it’s partly why I excluded SS when I’d
mentioned the robustness of my planned guaranteed retirement income stream.
In any event, just what have the above mentioned Republicans have stated as
their plan to restore the financial solvency of SS? Be specific, and provide the
URLs for the documentation thereof…and don’t reply without them, because
doing so reinforces what they’ve said that their goal is to defund SS and/or MC.
The most obvious change is to gradually increase the retirement age.
Apologies, I missed the reply.
First off, is raising the retirement age your proposal, or a Republican one? Because I asked you for the latter, not the former.
Second, what are the ramifications of that proposal? Specifically, do they disproportionately benefit the wealthy over the working class? After all, blue collar jobs tend to beat up the body such that it is often already physically 'worn out' by age 65, let alone 67 or higher.
Third, isn't the most obvious change the one that we've done before, namely to raise the annual contribution limit? This year, it is just $147,000, and that's
before considering how there's loopholes which raise compensation in ways that aren't taxable, such as through stock options: why not require employer SS contributions on *all* employee compensation forms?
FWIW, these means of increasing income inequity show up in other ways too; take the RMDs on 401(k)s as an example: the non-1%ers need to spend out of their 401k to have a retirement income stream long before they get to age 72. Similarly, the recent change on IRA benefit to a ten year withdrawal timeline allows for market timing for those who don't need the money.
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:24:48 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, November 7, 2022 at 8:21:42 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 5:43:27 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
...Oh, I know of the SS solvency challenges; it’s partly why I excluded SS when I’d
mentioned the robustness of my planned guaranteed retirement income stream.
In any event, just what have the above mentioned Republicans have stated as
their plan to restore the financial solvency of SS? Be specific, and provide the
URLs for the documentation thereof…and don’t reply without them, because
doing so reinforces what they’ve said that their goal is to defund SS and/or MC.
Apologies, I missed the reply.The most obvious change is to gradually increase the retirement age.Funny, NONE of the libtards ever responded to this!
First off, is raising the retirement age your proposal, or a Republican one? Because I asked you for the latter, not the former.
Second, what are the ramifications of that proposal? Specifically, do they disproportionately benefit the wealthy over the working class? After all, blue collar jobs tend to beat up the body such that it is often already physically 'worn out' by age 65, let alone 67 or higher.
Third, isn't the most obvious change the one that we've done before, namely to raise the annual contribution limit? This year, it is just $147,000, and that's
before considering how there's loopholes which raise compensation in ways that aren't taxable, such as through stock options: why not require employer SS contributions on *all* employee compensation forms?
FWIW, these means of increasing income inequity show up in other ways too; take the RMDs on 401(k)s as an example: the non-1%ers need to spend out of their 401k to have a retirement income stream long before they get to age 72.
Similarly, the recent change on IRA benefit to a ten year withdrawal timeline
allows for market timing for those who don't need the money.
-hh
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:27:21 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:24:48 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, November 7, 2022 at 8:21:42 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:Apologies, I missed the reply.
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 5:43:27 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Funny, NONE of the libtards ever responded to this!
...Oh, I know of the SS solvency challenges; it’s partly why I excluded SS when I’d
mentioned the robustness of my planned guaranteed retirement income stream.
In any event, just what have the above mentioned Republicans have stated as
their plan to restore the financial solvency of SS? Be specific, and provide the
URLs for the documentation thereof…and don’t reply without them, because
doing so reinforces what they’ve said that their goal is to defund SS and/or MC.
The most obvious change is to gradually increase the retirement age.
First off, is raising the retirement age your proposal, or a Republican one? >> Because I asked you for the latter, not the former.
Second, what are the ramifications of that proposal? Specifically, do they >> disproportionately benefit the wealthy over the working class? After all,
blue collar jobs tend to beat up the body such that it is often already
physically 'worn out' by age 65, let alone 67 or higher.
Third, isn't the most obvious change the one that we've done before, namely >> to raise the annual contribution limit? This year, it is just $147,000, and that's
before considering how there's loopholes which raise compensation in ways
that aren't taxable, such as through stock options: why not require employer >> SS contributions on *all* employee compensation forms?
FWIW, these means of increasing income inequity show up in other ways too; >> take the RMDs on 401(k)s as an example: the non-1%ers need to spend out of >> their 401k to have a retirement income stream long before they get to age 72.
Similarly, the recent change on IRA benefit to a ten year withdrawal timeline
allows for market timing for those who don't need the money.
-hh
Okay, Lyin' Asshole, let's hear the DIM "solution" to save Social Security and Medicare. Be sure to include links, references, quotes, etc.
On 2022-11-23 18:45, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:27:21 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:24:48 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, November 7, 2022 at 8:21:42 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:Apologies, I missed the reply.
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 5:43:27 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
...Oh, I know of the SS solvency challenges; it’s partly why I excluded SS when I’d
mentioned the robustness of my planned guaranteed retirement income stream.
In any event, just what have the above mentioned Republicans have stated as
their plan to restore the financial solvency of SS? Be specific, and provide the
URLs for the documentation thereof…and don’t reply without them, because
doing so reinforces what they’ve said that their goal is to defund SS and/or MC.
The most obvious change is to gradually increase the retirement age. >>> Funny, NONE of the libtards ever responded to this!
First off, is raising the retirement age your proposal, or a Republican one?
Because I asked you for the latter, not the former.
Second, what are the ramifications of that proposal? Specifically, do they
disproportionately benefit the wealthy over the working class? After all, >> blue collar jobs tend to beat up the body such that it is often already >> physically 'worn out' by age 65, let alone 67 or higher.
Third, isn't the most obvious change the one that we've done before, namely
to raise the annual contribution limit? This year, it is just $147,000, and that's
before considering how there's loopholes which raise compensation in ways >> that aren't taxable, such as through stock options: why not require employer
SS contributions on *all* employee compensation forms?
FWIW, these means of increasing income inequity show up in other ways too;
take the RMDs on 401(k)s as an example: the non-1%ers need to spend out of
their 401k to have a retirement income stream long before they get to age 72.
Similarly, the recent change on IRA benefit to a ten year withdrawal timeline
allows for market timing for those who don't need the money.
-hh
Okay, Lyin' Asshole, let's hear the DIM "solution" to save Social Security and Medicare.
Be sure to include links, references, quotes, etc.
A good start would be repealing the Trump tax cuts that only benefited
the rich and increased the deficit.
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 2:44:50 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 1:24:32 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:33:26 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:57:29 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Oh, so it wasn’t four Republican Senators, but just two who advocated to abolish both?
Because that “both” requirement is why they didn’t include Senator Lee:
< https://twitter.com/dwuhlfelderlaw/status/1588139132034945025?s=61&t=MAO9hzhk2SkybrziuyUueQ>
Trustee Report:Hey Lyin' Asshole, is the WaPo, your libtard bible, WRONG?Nope, and not what I said: the WP's fact-check was that there were fewer Republicans
unequivocally advocating to abolish SS/MC then had been reported.
That doesn't mean that there's no Republicans unequivocally advocating to kill SS or MC,
as the video clip I provided of another Republican Senator (SEN Lee) proves.
The bottom line is that Business would love to no longer have to pay their share of Social
Security (6.2%) or Medicare taxes (1.45%) and Republicans in particular are eager to try
to garner their campaign contribution donations by promising them to do that, regardless
of the adverse consequences on the general public.
-hhThe Bottom Line is that the Dims are LYING when they claim that Republicans want to abolish Social Security and Medicare, which would be political SUICIDE. What they want is to shore up its financial solvency, which IS in doubt. Just read the SS
https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2021/
Don't bother responding UNTIL you have actually READ this report.
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 3:02:56 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 2:44:50 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 1:24:32 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 9:33:26 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 11:57:29 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
and Medicare! This is a TOTAL LIE and they KNOW IT!! The WaPo gave it FOUR PINNOCHIOS!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/27/false-claim-that-senate-republicans-plan-end-social-security-medicare/
Oh, so it wasn’t four Republican Senators, but just two who advocated to abolish both?
Because that “both” requirement is why they didn’t include Senator Lee:
< https://twitter.com/dwuhlfelderlaw/status/1588139132034945025?s=61&t=MAO9hzhk2SkybrziuyUueQ>
Trustee Report:Hey Lyin' Asshole, is the WaPo, your libtard bible, WRONG?Nope, and not what I said: the WP's fact-check was that there were fewer Republicans
unequivocally advocating to abolish SS/MC then had been reported.
That doesn't mean that there's no Republicans unequivocally advocating to kill SS or MC,
as the video clip I provided of another Republican Senator (SEN Lee) proves.
The bottom line is that Business would love to no longer have to pay their share of Social
Security (6.2%) or Medicare taxes (1.45%) and Republicans in particular are eager to try
to garner their campaign contribution donations by promising them to do that, regardless
of the adverse consequences on the general public.
-hhThe Bottom Line is that the Dims are LYING when they claim that Republicans want to abolish Social Security and Medicare, which would be political SUICIDE. What they want is to shore up its financial solvency, which IS in doubt. Just read the SS
to the achievement of human flourishing, a concept the ancient Greeks called eudaimonia, or a life composed of all the highest goods. Su talked of five basic human desires that are met through the pursuit of mathematics: play, beauty, truth, justice andhttps://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2021/I read it
Don't bother responding UNTIL you have actually READ this report.
The bottom line is you are in error
https://science.slashdot.org/story/17/02/03/1450209/to-live-your-best-life-do-mathematics
Excerpts from an article on Quanta Magazine, rearranged for clarity and space: Math conferences don't usually feature standing ovations, but Francis Su received one last month in Atlanta. In his talk he framed mathematics as a pursuit uniquely suited
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 69:13:29 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,701 |