with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!And yet you cannot provide the quote.
Got it, Sunshine!
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim. >>>
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim. >>>
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden
was involved".
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment...
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim
exists.
Because it doesn't.
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:15:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden
On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim. >>>>>
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
was involved".
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment...
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim
exists.
Because it doesn't.
Hey, Fool, READ THE ARTICLE!!!!
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-18 21:46, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:15:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I did.
On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden
On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
was involved".
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment...
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim
exists.
Because it doesn't.
Hey, Fool, READ THE ARTICLE!!!!
The text you claim "proves biden was involved" doesn't exist.
Hey Fool, you can't read very well, I said the article proves Biden was involved, NOT that string of text is in the article - how DUMB are you anyhow???
On 2022-10-18 21:46, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:15:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden
On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
was involved".
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment...
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim
exists.
Because it doesn't.
Hey, Fool, READ THE ARTICLE!!!!I did.
The text you claim "proves biden was involved" doesn't exist.
On 2022-10-19 19:18, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-18 21:46, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:15:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I did.
On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden >>>> was involved".
On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment...
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim >>>> exists.
Because it doesn't.
Hey, Fool, READ THE ARTICLE!!!!
The text you claim "proves biden was involved" doesn't exist.
Hey Fool, you can't read very well, I said the article proves Biden was involved, NOT that string of text is in the article - how DUMB are you anyhow???So make your argument...
...using the text of the article.
But we both know you won't.
On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 7:24:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-19 19:18, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So make your argument...
On 2022-10-18 21:46, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:15:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I did.
On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden >>>>>> was involved".
On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment...
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim >>>>>> exists.
Because it doesn't.
Hey, Fool, READ THE ARTICLE!!!!
The text you claim "proves biden was involved" doesn't exist.
Hey Fool, you can't read very well, I said the article proves Biden was involved, NOT that string of text is in the article - how DUMB are you anyhow???
...using the text of the article.
But we both know you won't.
I provided you with the cite, Fool.
On 2022-10-20 17:55, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 7:24:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-19 19:18, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So make your argument...
On 2022-10-18 21:46, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:15:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I did.
On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden >>>>>> was involved".
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment...
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim >>>>>> exists.
Because it doesn't.
Hey, Fool, READ THE ARTICLE!!!!
The text you claim "proves biden was involved" doesn't exist.
Hey Fool, you can't read very well, I said the article proves Biden was involved, NOT that string of text is in the article - how DUMB are you anyhow???
...using the text of the article.
But we both know you won't.
I provided you with the cite, Fool.You provided an article.
I read it.
It doesn't support—let alone prove—what you've claimed.
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 9:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-20 17:55, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 7:24:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You provided an article.
On 2022-10-19 19:18, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So make your argument...
On 2022-10-18 21:46, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:15:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I did.
On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden >>>>>>>> was involved".
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment...
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim >>>>>>>> exists.
Because it doesn't.
Hey, Fool, READ THE ARTICLE!!!!
The text you claim "proves biden was involved" doesn't exist.
Hey Fool, you can't read very well, I said the article proves Biden was involved, NOT that string of text is in the article - how DUMB are you anyhow???
...using the text of the article.
But we both know you won't.
I provided you with the cite, Fool.
I read it.
It doesn't support—let alone prove—what you've claimed.
Hey Fool, if you had ACTUALLY read the article you would have found this link:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/spy-chief-of-china-laptop-recording-sheds-light-on-hunter-bidens-overseas-business
In that article is a link to this article: https://thenationalpulse.com/2020/10/27/biden-recording-spy-chief-and-sdny/
On 2022-10-21 19:35, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 9:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-20 17:55, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 7:24:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You provided an article.
On 2022-10-19 19:18, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So make your argument...
On 2022-10-18 21:46, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:15:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:I did.
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
was involved".
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment... >>>>>>>>
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim
exists.
Because it doesn't.
Hey, Fool, READ THE ARTICLE!!!!
The text you claim "proves biden was involved" doesn't exist.
Hey Fool, you can't read very well, I said the article proves Biden was involved, NOT that string of text is in the article - how DUMB are you anyhow???
...using the text of the article.
But we both know you won't.
I provided you with the cite, Fool.
I read it.
It doesn't support—let alone prove—what you've claimed.
Hey Fool, if you had ACTUALLY read the article you would have found this link:So... ...I'm supposed to read an article...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/spy-chief-of-china-laptop-recording-sheds-light-on-hunter-bidens-overseas-business
In that article is a link to this article: https://thenationalpulse.com/2020/10/27/biden-recording-spy-chief-and-sdny/
...that you NOW claim will lead me to another article...
...which will lead me to yet a THIRD article...
...that you claim...
...but won't show...
...actually supports your claim.
Sunshine: you haven't even show that Hunter Biden did anything illegal.
On Friday, October 21, 2022 at 7:57:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-21 19:35, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 9:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-20 17:55, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 7:24:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You provided an article.
On 2022-10-19 19:18, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So make your argument...
On 2022-10-18 21:46, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:15:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 20:52, TomS wrote:I did.
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 19:30, TomS wrote:I state unequivocally that no statement in that article "proves Biden
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 9:09:14 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-10-18 08:39, TomS wrote:And yet you cannot provide the quote.
with, and knew of, Hunter BooBoo's criminal activities contrary to the pervert's comments to the contrary! This 47-minute recording was on BooBoo's laptop.Sunshine... ...that's not an audio recording...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china
...that's a URL.
So why don't you quote the part of the ARTICLE that supports your claim.
Hey Fool, READ the article - it IS there!
Got it, Sunshine!
No, you can't read. Got it.
was involved".
Now: you have an perfect opportunity for a "gotcha" moment... >>>>>>>>>>
...but we both know that you still won't produce this quote you claim
exists.
Because it doesn't.
Hey, Fool, READ THE ARTICLE!!!!
The text you claim "proves biden was involved" doesn't exist.
Hey Fool, you can't read very well, I said the article proves Biden was involved, NOT that string of text is in the article - how DUMB are you anyhow???
...using the text of the article.
But we both know you won't.
I provided you with the cite, Fool.
I read it.
It doesn't support—let alone prove—what you've claimed.
Hey Fool, if you had ACTUALLY read the article you would have found this link:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/spy-chief-of-china-laptop-recording-sheds-light-on-hunter-bidens-overseas-business
In that article is a link to this article:
https://thenationalpulse.com/2020/10/27/biden-recording-spy-chief-and-sdny/ >> So... ...I'm supposed to read an article...
...that you NOW claim will lead me to another article...
...which will lead me to yet a THIRD article...
...that you claim...
...but won't show...
...actually supports your claim.
Sunshine: you haven't even show that Hunter Biden did anything illegal.
...and you haven't read a SINGLE ONE OF THEM! The facts are there and WILL be investigated once the Republicans take control of Congress back in a few days.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 59:13:06 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,243 |
| Messages: | 5,355,690 |