Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons of water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due toinfrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect surrounding structures.
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered cars and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk of the EV catching fire and burning the house down.
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs. https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-aftermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-collier-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/7/electric-vehicle-batteries-corroded-hurricane-ian-/
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more likely to catch on fire than electric cars."
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021
-- https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
(Tom Loses Again)
On 2022-10-07 11:21, TomS wrote:infrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect surrounding structures.
Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons of water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due to
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered cars and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk of the EV catching fire and burning the house down.
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs. https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-aftermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-collier-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage'he said there are "a ton" of EVs currently disabled from the storm.'
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/7/electric-vehicle-batteries-corroded-hurricane-ian-/
"disabled" is not "on fire".
He's clearly making a PREDICTION, and I don't see anything in his job description that shows he'd have the necessary expertise to make that prediction.
'There is currently no official count of how many EV batteries have
caught fire as a result of Hurricane Ian.'
And:
'Study: Electric Vehicles Involved in Fewest Car Fires'
<https://www.kbb.com/car-news/study-electric-vehicles-involved-in-fewest-car-fires/>
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 11:29:25 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 11:21, TomS wrote:
Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting'he said there are "a ton" of EVs currently disabled from the
out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up
firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons of
water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due to
infrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect
surrounding structures.
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered cars
and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk of the EV
catching fire and burning the house down.
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a
corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months
later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs.
https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-aftermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-collier-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/7/electric-vehicle-batteries-corroded-hurricane-ian-/
storm.'
"disabled" is not "on fire".
"Disabled" includes those that caught fire as well as those that are
about to catch fire.
He's clearly making a PREDICTION, and I don't see anything in his
job description that shows he'd have the necessary expertise to
make that prediction.
'There is currently no official count of how many EV batteries
have caught fire as a result of Hurricane Ian.'
I heard a count of 10 by a fire chief.
What is your support for "Most ICE fires involve older vehicles."
And:
'Study: Electric Vehicles Involved in Fewest Car Fires'
<https://www.kbb.com/car-news/study-electric-vehicles-involved-in-fewest-car-fires/>
Gas-powered cars DON'T catch fire when submerged in water, so this
study is not relevant. Also, EVs have not as a group reached the
average age of gas-powered cars. Most ICE fires involve older
vehicles. And when they do they are FAR easier to put out than EVs.
On 2022-10-07 21:25, TomS wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 11:29:25 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 11:21, TomS wrote:
Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting'he said there are "a ton" of EVs currently disabled from the
out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up
firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons of
water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due to
infrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect
surrounding structures.
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered cars
and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk of the EV
catching fire and burning the house down.
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a
corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months
later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs.
https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-aftermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-collier-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/7/electric-vehicle-batteries-corroded-hurricane-ian-/
storm.'
"disabled" is not "on fire".
"Disabled" includes those that caught fire as well as those that are
about to catch fire.
That's "supposition" on your part.
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 3:17:52 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 21:25, TomS wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 11:29:25 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 11:21, TomS wrote:
Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting'he said there are "a ton" of EVs currently disabled from the
out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up
firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons of
water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due to
infrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect
surrounding structures.
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered cars
and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk of the EV
catching fire and burning the house down.
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a
corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months
later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs.
https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-aftermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-collier-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/7/electric-vehicle-batteries-corroded-hurricane-ian-/
storm.'
"disabled" is not "on fire".
"Disabled" includes those that caught fire as well as those that are about to catch fire.
That's "supposition" on your part.
What I find curious is if this is even reasonably a big concern, given first principles.
Case in point: the claim is that dunking an EV in seawater creates fires, right?
Well, the presumption here is salt water contact with the electrical system, but if that’s the case because saltwater contains an electrolyte, it’s going
to discharge the battery pack. So okay, there can be some exothermic reactions while it is dunked…but that’s also self-extinguishing for the bottom of the car where the batteries are located.
One that energy is thus consumed, what’s left as an energy source to
cause any additional fire as waters recede and the vehicle dries out?
-hh
On 2022-10-07 21:25, TomS wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 11:29:25 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 11:21, TomS wrote:
Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting'he said there are "a ton" of EVs currently disabled from the
out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up
firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons of
water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due to
infrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect
surrounding structures.
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered cars
and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk of the EV
catching fire and burning the house down.
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a
corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months
later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs.
https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-aftermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-collier-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/7/electric-vehicle-batteries-corroded-hurricane-ian-/
storm.'
"disabled" is not "on fire".
"Disabled" includes those that caught fire as well as those that areThat's "supposition" on your part.
about to catch fire.
I suggest you look up the word.
He's clearly making a PREDICTION, and I don't see anything in his
job description that shows he'd have the necessary expertise to
make that prediction.
'There is currently no official count of how many EV batteries
have caught fire as a result of Hurricane Ian.'
I heard a count of 10 by a fire chief.Where?
Let's see a source, Sunshine.
And:
'Study: Electric Vehicles Involved in Fewest Car Fires'
<https://www.kbb.com/car-news/study-electric-vehicles-involved-in-fewest-car-fires/>
What is your support for "Most ICE fires involve older vehicles."Gas-powered cars DON'T catch fire when submerged in water, so this
study is not relevant. Also, EVs have not as a group reached the
average age of gas-powered cars. Most ICE fires involve older
vehicles. And when they do they are FAR easier to put out than EVs.
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 11:29:25 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 11:21, TomS wrote:
Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting
out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up
firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons of
water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due to
infrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect
surrounding structures.
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered cars
and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk of the EV catching fire and burning the house down.
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a
corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months
later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs. https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-a ftermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-c ollier-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage
'he said there are "a ton" of EVs currently disabled from the
storm.'
"disabled" is not "on fire".
"Disabled" includes those that caught fire as well as those that are
about to catch fire.
He's clearly making a PREDICTION, and I don't see anything in his
job description that shows he'd have the necessary expertise to
make that prediction.
'There is currently no official count of how many EV batteries have
caught fire as a result of Hurricane Ian.'
I heard a count of 10 by a fire chief.
And:
'Study: Electric Vehicles Involved in Fewest Car Fires'
Gas-powered cars DON'T catch fire when submerged in water, so this
study is not relevant. Also, EVs have not as a group reached the
average age of gas-powered cars. Most ICE fires involve older
vehicles. And when they do they are FAR easier to put out than EVs.
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 1:33:26 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 3:17:52 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 21:25, TomS wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 11:29:25 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 11:21, TomS wrote:
Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting'he said there are "a ton" of EVs currently disabled from the
out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up
firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons of
water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due to
infrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect
surrounding structures.
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered cars
and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk of the EV >>> catching fire and burning the house down.
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a
corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months
later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs.
https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-aftermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-collier-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/7/electric-vehicle-batteries-corroded-hurricane-ian-/
storm.'
"disabled" is not "on fire".
"Disabled" includes those that caught fire as well as those that are about to catch fire.
That's "supposition" on your part.
What I find curious is if this is even reasonably a big concern, given first principles.
Case in point: the claim is that dunking an EV in seawater creates fires, right?
Well, the presumption here is salt water contact with the electrical system,
but if that’s the case because saltwater contains an electrolyte, it’s going
to discharge the battery pack. So okay, there can be some exothermic reactions while it is dunked…but that’s also self-extinguishing for the
bottom of the car where the batteries are located.
One that energy is thus consumed, what’s left as an energy source to cause any additional fire as waters recede and the vehicle dries out?
Hey Lyin' Asshole, you obviously don't have an EE degree.
First, when a lithium-ion battery catches fire there is NO WAY to extinguish it because it generates its own oxygen.
Second, exposing the burning lithium battery to water can generate
hydrogen with predictable consequences.
Third, the battery pack in EVs is sealed and water tight.
The problem is that all of the electronics, wiring and connectors become contaminated with electrically conductive gunk when flooded with salt water, and energizing that mess will result in short circuits with the high potential of fire.
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:17:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 21:25, TomS wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 11:29:25 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/7/electric-vehicle-batteries-corroded-hurricane-ian-/
On 2022-10-07 11:21, TomS wrote:
Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting
out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up
firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons of
water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due to
infrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect
surrounding structures.
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered cars
and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk of the EV
catching fire and burning the house down.
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a
corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months
later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs.
https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-aftermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-collier-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage
That's "supposition" on your part.'he said there are "a ton" of EVs currently disabled from the
storm.'
"disabled" is not "on fire".
"Disabled" includes those that caught fire as well as those that are
about to catch fire.
I suggest you look up the word.
No, its "equivalency" - look it up.
Where?
He's clearly making a PREDICTION, and I don't see anything in his
job description that shows he'd have the necessary expertise to
make that prediction.
'There is currently no official count of how many EV batteries
have caught fire as a result of Hurricane Ian.'
I heard a count of 10 by a fire chief.
Fox News. I recommend that you listen (assuming it isn't censored in Canuck Land).
Let's see a source, Sunshine.
Gave it to you.
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:17:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-07 21:25, TomS wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 11:29:25 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:of >>> water to keep them cool. When water is unavailable due to
On 2022-10-07 11:21, TomS wrote:
Teslas, and other EVs, caught in salt flood water are shorting
out and catching fire. Worse, each EV fire still ties up
firefighters for many hours and requires thousands of gallons
cars >>> and left their EVs behind in their garages run the risk ofinfrastructure failure they must let them burn and protect
surrounding structures.
People who fled their homes in their long-range gas-powered
the EV >>> catching fire and burning the house down.
https://weartv.com/news/local/electric-vehicles-catching-fire-in-aft ermath-of-hurricane-ian-florida-official-warns-cars-explosions-colli er-lee-southwest-landfall-storm-damage >>> >>> https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/7/electric-vehicle-bat teries-corroded-hurricane-ian-/ >> 'he said there are "a ton" of
Furthermore, EVs that have been exposed to salt water start a
corrosion process that may not result in a fire until months
later, making them ticking time bombs.
This IS the perfect storm for EVs.
EVs currently disabled from the >> storm.' >>
"disabled" is not "on fire".
"Disabled" includes those that caught fire as well as those thatThat's "supposition" on your part.
are about to catch fire.
I suggest you look up the word.
No, its "equivalency" - look it up.
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more likely to catch on fire than electric cars."
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021
-- https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
(Tom Loses Again)Nope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:26:36 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more likely to catch on fire than electric cars."
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021
-- https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
yep.(Tom Loses Again)Nope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:40:36 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:26:36 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more likely to catch on fire than electric cars."
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021
-- https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
TomS is brain dead. More gas powered cars on fire than electric.yep.(Tom Loses Again)Nope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 6:49:34 AM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:40:36 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:26:36 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:TomS is brain dead. More gas powered cars on fire than electric.
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:yep.
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more likely to catch on fire than electric cars."Nope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021
-- https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
(Tom Loses Again)
HA HA HA HA! And WHAT do you think caused the fire aboard the Felicity Ace (https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/01/world/europe/ship-sinks-luxury-cars.html)?
On 2022-10-10 21:32, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 6:49:34 AM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:40:36 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:26:36 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:TomS is brain dead. More gas powered cars on fire than electric.
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>> " ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more likely to catch on fire than electric cars."yep.
Nope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021
-- https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
(Tom Loses Again)
HA HA HA HA! And WHAT do you think caused the fire aboard the Felicity Ace (https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/01/world/europe/ship-sinks-luxury-cars.html)?Do you have any evidence at all it was caused by an EV?
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:47:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:(Tom Loses Again)
On 2022-10-10 21:32, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 6:49:34 AM UTC-7, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:40:36 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:26:36 AM UTC-4, TomS
wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce
bowser wrote:
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more
likely to catch on fire than electric cars."
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021 --
https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
Do you have any evidence at all it was caused by an EV?TomS is brain dead. More gas powered cars on fire thanNope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!yep.
electric.
HA HA HA HA! And WHAT do you think caused the fire aboard the
Felicity Ace
(https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/01/world/europe/ship-sinks-luxury-cars.html)?
Do you have ANY evidence that it wasn't? Smoke from the ship was
WHITE, indicating that the electrolytes of the EV batteries were
burning (gas would produce BLACK smoke, ace).
On 2022-10-10 22:30, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:47:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:(Tom Loses Again)
On 2022-10-10 21:32, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 6:49:34 AM UTC-7, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:40:36 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:26:36 AM UTC-4, TomS
wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce
bowser wrote:
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more
likely to catch on fire than electric cars."
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021 --
https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
Sorry, Sunshine.Do you have any evidence at all it was caused by an EV?TomS is brain dead. More gas powered cars on fire thanNope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!yep.
electric.
HA HA HA HA! And WHAT do you think caused the fire aboard the
Felicity Ace
(https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/01/world/europe/ship-sinks-luxury-cars.html)?
You're making the claim: YOU provide some evidence.
Do you have ANY evidence that it wasn't? Smoke from the ship wasAnd you're claiming that there is absolutely nothing on an entire ship
WHITE, indicating that the electrolytes of the EV batteries were
burning (gas would produce BLACK smoke, ace).
that could produce white smoke, Sunshine?
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 11:25:42 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-10 22:30, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:47:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:(Tom Loses Again)
On 2022-10-10 21:32, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 6:49:34 AM UTC-7, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:40:36 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:26:36 AM UTC-4, TomS
wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce
bowser wrote:
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more
likely to catch on fire than electric cars."
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021 --
https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
Sorry, Sunshine.Do you have any evidence at all it was caused by an EV?TomS is brain dead. More gas powered cars on fire thanNope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!yep.
electric.
HA HA HA HA! And WHAT do you think caused the fire aboard the
Felicity Ace
(https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/01/world/europe/ship-sinks-luxury-cars.html)?
You're making the claim: YOU provide some evidence.
And you're claiming that there is absolutely nothing on an entire ship
Do you have ANY evidence that it wasn't? Smoke from the ship was
WHITE, indicating that the electrolytes of the EV batteries were
burning (gas would produce BLACK smoke, ace).
that could produce white smoke, Sunshine?
LOL! Keep up the deflection, Fool!!
On 2022-10-11 22:19, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 11:25:42 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-10 22:30, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:47:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:(Tom Loses Again)
On 2022-10-10 21:32, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 6:49:34 AM UTC-7, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:40:36 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:26:36 AM UTC-4, TomS
wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce
bowser wrote:
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more
likely to catch on fire than electric cars."
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021 --
https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
Sorry, Sunshine.Do you have any evidence at all it was caused by an EV?TomS is brain dead. More gas powered cars on fire thanNope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!yep.
electric.
HA HA HA HA! And WHAT do you think caused the fire aboard the
Felicity Ace
(https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/01/world/europe/ship-sinks-luxury-cars.html)?
You're making the claim: YOU provide some evidence.
And you're claiming that there is absolutely nothing on an entire ship
Do you have ANY evidence that it wasn't? Smoke from the ship was
WHITE, indicating that the electrolytes of the EV batteries were
burning (gas would produce BLACK smoke, ace).
that could produce white smoke, Sunshine?
LOL! Keep up the deflection, Fool!!I'm not the one making the claim, Sunshine.
That was you, and as usual, you've provided nothing.
On Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 10:29:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-10-11 22:19, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 11:25:42 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I'm not the one making the claim, Sunshine.
On 2022-10-10 22:30, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:47:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:(Tom Loses Again)
On 2022-10-10 21:32, TomS wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 6:49:34 AM UTC-7, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:40:36 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser
wrote:
On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:26:36 AM UTC-4, TomS
wrote:
On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 12:12:36 PM UTC-7, bruce
bowser wrote:
" ... combustion-powered cars are statistically more
likely to catch on fire than electric cars."
Car Buzz Magazine -.Sep 22, 2021 --
https://carbuzz.com/news/watch-a-tesla-owner-save-driver-from-burning-bmw-x1-before-it-explodes
Sorry, Sunshine.Do you have any evidence at all it was caused by an EV?TomS is brain dead. More gas powered cars on fire thanNope, Bowser Wowser, YOU lose again!yep.
electric.
HA HA HA HA! And WHAT do you think caused the fire aboard the
Felicity Ace
(https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/01/world/europe/ship-sinks-luxury-cars.html)?
You're making the claim: YOU provide some evidence.
And you're claiming that there is absolutely nothing on an entire ship >>>> that could produce white smoke, Sunshine?
Do you have ANY evidence that it wasn't? Smoke from the ship was
WHITE, indicating that the electrolytes of the EV batteries were
burning (gas would produce BLACK smoke, ace).
LOL! Keep up the deflection, Fool!!
That was you, and as usual, you've provided nothing.
Pure deflection, Fool.
On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:47:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
Do you have any evidence at all it was caused by an EV?
Do you have ANY evidence that it wasn't?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 71:07:01 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,967 |