1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.GOLF

  • Hospitals getting sued for denying religeous exemptions

    From Irving S@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 17 12:47:01 2022
    Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison.

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Irving S on Wed Aug 17 13:01:49 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison.

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.

    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review
    the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street: patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all
    requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to -hh on Wed Aug 17 13:04:00 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:01:51 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison.

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.
    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street: patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all
    requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too.


    -hh

    Bottom line is if you claim a religeous exemption,, the employer needs to respect it. Two huge settlements just this month, love it. This is what an employer gets for being an asshole, not respecting the religeous freedom of others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to -hh on Wed Aug 17 13:11:14 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:01:51 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison.

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.
    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street: patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all
    requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too.


    -hh

    LOL!

    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught Covid? Do you comprehend the concept of burden of proof? Those lawsuits will go nowhere. Good try clownie, sadly you failed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Irving S on Wed Aug 17 15:02:52 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:01:51 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison.

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.
    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street: patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too.


    -hh
    LOL!

    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught Covid?
    Do you comprehend the concept of burden of proof? Those lawsuits will go nowhere. Good try clownie, sadly you failed.

    Genetic sequencing has changed that factor.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to -hh on Wed Aug 17 19:15:10 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:02:53 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:01:51 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison.

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.
    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review
    the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street: patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too.


    -hh
    LOL!

    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught Covid?
    Do you comprehend the concept of burden of proof? Those lawsuits will go nowhere. Good try clownie, sadly you failed.
    Genetic sequencing has changed that factor.

    -hh

    And you can provide a citation to back that up, right?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed Aug 17 19:20:50 2022
    On 2022-08-17 19:15, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:02:53 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:01:51 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison.

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.
    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review >>>> the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street: >>>> patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all
    requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too. >>>>

    -hh
    LOL!

    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught Covid?
    Do you comprehend the concept of burden of proof? Those lawsuits will go >>> nowhere. Good try clownie, sadly you failed.
    Genetic sequencing has changed that factor.

    -hh

    And you can provide a citation to back that up, right?

    Sunshine: why is it you always want others to provide cites...

    ...but always demand that others look it up themselves?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Aug 18 02:44:03 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 6:02:53 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:01:51 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison.

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.
    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review
    the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street:
    patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too.


    -hh
    LOL!

    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught Covid?
    Do you comprehend the concept of burden of proof? Those lawsuits will go nowhere. Good try clownie, sadly you failed.
    Genetic sequencing has changed that factor.

    -hh

    Hilarious. Dude you really pulled that one out of your rectal sphinter.

    During a routine hospital stay of a few days, a patient must come in contact with dozens of hospital staff. How does the patient who alleges he got Covid 19 from the institution decide who should submit to genetic sequencing. And even if it was
    logistically possible, who would pay for it. This is no cheap endeavor.

    Good try, you fail. If you want to spin, you gotta come up with something better than "Genetic sequencing"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Aug 18 03:53:02 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 10:20:53 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-17 19:15, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:02:53 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:01:51 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote: >>>>> Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison. >>>>>
    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.
    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review
    the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street:
    patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all >>>> requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too. >>>>

    -hh
    LOL!

    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught Covid? >>> Do you comprehend the concept of burden of proof? Those lawsuits will go >>> nowhere. Good try clownie, sadly you failed.
    Genetic sequencing has changed that factor.

    -hh

    And you can provide a citation to back that up, right?

    Sunshine: why is it you always want others to provide cites...

    ...but always demand that others look it up themselves?

    Tommy is just illustrating how he’s not kept up with current technology:

    < https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/genomic-surveillance.html>

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 18 18:47:01 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught
    Covid?

    Well if they were negative when they arrived from isolation at home and positive while remaining and it was shown they came into contact with
    covid positive staff/patients then there would be little in the way of reasonable doubt.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Thu Aug 18 11:54:35 2022
    On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 2:47:04 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught
    Covid?
    Well if they were negative when they arrived from isolation at home and positive while remaining and it was shown they came into contact with
    covid positive staff/patients then there would be little in the way of reasonable doubt.

    No one can be this stupid, well maybe an unemployed dog walker.

    Just because you isolate at home, does that not mean the Covid virus is not in the air. Does that not mean that family or friends did not transmit the virus. Does that not mean that EMS staff that took you to the hospital if you were sick did not
    transmit the virus. What about going to stores, taking a walk, going to a doctors office. The virus is everywhere, you fucking moron. VIrus are everywhere, bacteria is everywhere, this is life.
    You fucking clod. For an award to be made, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to PROVE that unvaccinated staff was the source of the infection. That is impossible. No court or judge will uphold this, it is speculation and would open the doors to
    massive fraud and abuse.

    Now go away and clean some dog shit. Your specialty.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Thu Aug 18 11:59:42 2022
    On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 2:47:04 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught
    Covid?
    Well if they were negative when they arrived from isolation at home and positive while remaining and it was shown they came into contact with
    covid positive staff/patients then there would be little in the way of reasonable doubt.

    And the tests are inaccurate anyway you twit. That is a fact. No one will allow faulty home test results to be used in a court of law. There is a chain of custody issue. A concept beyond your simple mind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Aug 28 20:34:03 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 7:20:53 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-17 19:15, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:02:53 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:01:51 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison. >>>>>
    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.
    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review
    the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street:
    patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all
    requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too. >>>>

    -hh
    LOL!

    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught Covid? >>> Do you comprehend the concept of burden of proof? Those lawsuits will go >>> nowhere. Good try clownie, sadly you failed.
    Genetic sequencing has changed that factor.

    -hh

    And you can provide a citation to back that up, right?
    Sunshine: why is it you always want others to provide cites...

    ...but always demand that others look it up themselves?

    So, you guys can't BACK UP your claims - RIGHT?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Aug 29 11:40:11 2022
    On 2022-08-28 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 7:20:53 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-17 19:15, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:02:53 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:11:16 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:01:51 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 3:47:02 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote: >>>>>>> Multimillion dollar settlements. Just the tip of the iceberg.

    Love every minute of it!

    Only a complete moron would roll up their sleeves for this poison. >>>>>>>
    https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/04/denying-religious-exemptions-to-covid-jab-is-costing-one-hospital-10m-in-legal-settlement/

    Just the beginning you vaxed lemmings, just the beginning.
    Lawsuit only because they had a blanket policy that didn't actually review
    the claims. What's interesting about that is that it is a two way street:
    patients who contracted CoVid from an establishment who allowed all >>>>>> requests without any review are susceptible to liability lawsuits too. >>>>>>

    -hh
    LOL!

    How do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt where someone caught Covid? >>>>> Do you comprehend the concept of burden of proof? Those lawsuits will go >>>>> nowhere. Good try clownie, sadly you failed.
    Genetic sequencing has changed that factor.

    -hh

    And you can provide a citation to back that up, right?
    Sunshine: why is it you always want others to provide cites...

    ...but always demand that others look it up themselves?

    So, you guys can't BACK UP your claims - RIGHT?

    So you can't answer why you have a double-standard.

    Got it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)