Look, I am a believer in freedom. Boost yourself every week if you want.

But there is enough out there, if you do not at least question, you are a world class clod.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/09/13/scientific-evidence-doesnt-back-booster-covid-shots-researchers-warn---even-for-the-delta-variant/?sh=5b92c8d67ff6

Of course, this is all BS. I get it. If the govt, and Hollywood, and Big Pharma says to boost, well they gotta be right. Anything to the contrary is conspiracy hogwash. I get it. But I don't live in your sick world of denial, so I raise my middle
finger and say "fuck off" while so many of you compliant virtue signaling dumbells will come back for more. Go for it, I do support your right to choose!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, August 15, 2022 at 12:15:35 AM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:

Look, I am a believer in freedom. Boost yourself every week if you want.

But there is enough out there, if you do not at least question, you are a world class clod.

<https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/09/13/scientific-evidence-doesnt-back-booster-covid-shots-researchers-warn---even-for-the-delta-variant/?sh=5b92c8d67ff6>

Looks like someone didn't read their cite before posting it. The 2021 report said a few things
for why they were supportive of the vaccine, but not for boosters for the _general_ population
at that time, in no small part because getting vaccinations out to people who hadn't received
any is more beneficial than giving boosters to those who already had the shot: this is a
resource inequity between wealthy nations vs poor nations. Similarly, they were concerned
about the indirect metric being used for the 'waning', and that even if wasn't incorrect, the
mere mention of it could reduce the public acceptance of general vaccine effectiveness,
which was undesirable.

TL;DR: vaccines good, but boosters for the wealthy before initial for the poor = bad.

-hh

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, August 15, 2022 at 8:55:42 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:

On Monday, August 15, 2022 at 12:15:35 AM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:

Look, I am a believer in freedom. Boost yourself every week if you want.

But there is enough out there, if you do not at least question, you are a world class clod.

<https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/09/13/scientific-evidence-doesnt-back-booster-covid-shots-researchers-warn---even-for-the-delta-variant/?sh=5b92c8d67ff6>

Looks like someone didn't read their cite before posting it. The 2021 report said a few things
for why they were supportive of the vaccine, but not for boosters for the _general_ population
at that time, in no small part because getting vaccinations out to people who hadn't received
any is more beneficial than giving boosters to those who already had the shot: this is a
resource inequity between wealthy nations vs poor nations. Similarly, they were concerned
about the indirect metric being used for the 'waning', and that even if wasn't incorrect, the
mere mention of it could reduce the public acceptance of general vaccine effectiveness,
which was undesirable.

TL;DR: vaccines good, but boosters for the wealthy before initial for the poor = bad.

-hh

Oh. here we go again with the income inequlity crap.
If you asked every american to list their 10 top issues, income inequality would be non existant. most of us could care less. There will always be haves and have nots. That is live.

SInce the beginning of man there was income inequality, to the day of our demise, there will be income inequality. Most folks i know work hard, went to school and got educated, pay their taxes. Have every right to enjoy their lives without guilt, that
others have less. most who have less have themselves to blame. And life is not fair, most of us have better things to do the fix the playing field. Life is not fair indeed. The other day I hit a drive down the middle, it hit a tractor that was
parked for some irrigation work, my ball deflected into the rough. A probable par became a six. What is fair about that? Such is life.

If you really cared so much about this issue, you would not be discussing it here. A place where no one visits, except for some enlightened conservatives and a few nutjob lefties. Love the way lefties whine and whine , yet seem to do so little other
than whining.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, August 15, 2022 at 4:31:35 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:

On Monday, August 15, 2022 at 8:55:42 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:

On Monday, August 15, 2022 at 12:15:35 AM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:

Look, I am a believer in freedom. Boost yourself every week if you want.

But there is enough out there, if you do not at least question, you are a world class clod.

<https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/09/13/scientific-evidence-doesnt-back-booster-covid-shots-researchers-warn---even-for-the-delta-variant/?sh=5b92c8d67ff6>

Looks like someone didn't read their cite before posting it. The 2021 report said a few things
for why they were supportive of the vaccine, but not for boosters for the _general_ population
at that time, in no small part because getting vaccinations out to people who hadn't received
any is more beneficial than giving boosters to those who already had the shot: this is a
resource inequity between wealthy nations vs poor nations. Similarly, they were concerned
about the indirect metric being used for the 'waning', and that even if wasn't incorrect, the
mere mention of it could reduce the public acceptance of general vaccine effectiveness,
which was undesirable.

TL;DR: vaccines good, but boosters for the wealthy before initial for the poor = bad.

Oh. here we go again with the income inequlity crap.

It was what your cite called out, cowboy.
As I said, you obviously didn’t read your own cite.

-hh

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2022-08-15 13:31, Irving S wrote:

On Monday, August 15, 2022 at 8:55:42 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:

On Monday, August 15, 2022 at 12:15:35 AM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:

Look, I am a believer in freedom. Boost yourself every week if
you want.

But there is enough out there, if you do not at least question,
you are a world class clod.

<https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/09/13/scientific-evidence-doesnt-back-booster-covid-shots-researchers-warn---even-for-the-delta-variant/?sh=5b92c8d67ff6>

Looks like someone didn't read their cite before posting it. The 2021
report said a few things

for why they were supportive of the vaccine, but not for boosters
for the _general_ population at that time, in no small part because
getting vaccinations out to people who hadn't received any is more
beneficial than giving boosters to those who already had the shot:
this is a resource inequity between wealthy nations vs poor
nations. Similarly, they were concerned about the indirect metric
being used for the 'waning', and that even if wasn't incorrect,
the mere mention of it could reduce the public acceptance of
general vaccine effectiveness, which was undesirable.

TL;DR: vaccines good, but boosters for the wealthy before initial
for the poor = bad.

-hh

Oh. here we go again with the income inequlity crap. If you asked
every american to list their 10 top issues, income inequality would
be non existant. most of us could care less. There will always be
haves and have nots. That is live.

SInce the beginning of man there was income inequality, to the day of
our demise, there will be income inequality. Most folks i know work
hard, went to school and got educated, pay their taxes. Have every
right to enjoy their lives without guilt, that others have less.
most who have less have themselves to blame. And life is not fair,
most of us have better things to do the fix the playing field. Life
is not fair indeed. The other day I hit a drive down the middle, it
hit a tractor that was parked for some irrigation work, my ball
deflected into the rough. A probable par became a six. What is fair
about that? Such is life.

If you really cared so much about this issue, you would not be
discussing it here. A place where no one visits, except for some
enlightened conservatives and a few nutjob lefties. Love the way
lefties whine and whine , yet seem to do so little other than
whining.

False dichotomy.

Discussing it here doesn't mean he's not discussing it elsewhere.

And he wasn't really discussing it so much as explaining a reality about
the availability of boosters versus getting initial vaccinations to
those who can't afford them.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)