The senile pervert's Gestapo (aka FBI) raided a FORMER PRESIDENT and likely POLITICAL OPPONENT'S HOME, Mar-a-Lago today. This was done under the guise that they wanted to "preserve presidential records," but they did not elaborate on it. Many boxes ofdocuments at Mar-a-Lago were seized w/o ANY review of what they contained. This is referred to as a "dragnet operation." No search warrant has been published:
"And no publicly available federal search warrants filed in South Florida recently shed light on why agents were there"
This proves how scared Lyin' Biden is of Trump running against him next year. Ironically, Lyin' Biden was having a pretty good week (good for the senile bastard, that is) until this ham-fisted move.
The senile pervert's Gestapo (aka FBI) raided a FORMER PRESIDENT and likely POLITICAL OPPONENT'S HOME, Mar-a-Lago today. This was done under the guise that they wanted to "preserve presidential records," but they did not elaborate on it. Many boxes ofdocuments at Mar-a-Lago were seized w/o ANY review of what they contained. This is referred to as a "dragnet operation." No search warrant has been published:
"And no publicly available federal search warrants filed in South Florida recently shed light on why agents were there"
This proves how scared Lyin' Biden is of Trump running against him next year. Ironically, Lyin' Biden was having a pretty good week (good for the senile bastard, that is) until this ham-fisted move.
The senile pervert's Gestapo (aka FBI) raided a FORMER PRESIDENT and
likely POLITICAL OPPONENT'S HOME, Mar-a-Lago today. This was done
under the guise that they wanted to "preserve presidential records,"
but they did not elaborate on it. Many boxes of documents at
Mar-a-Lago were seized w/o ANY review of what they contained. This is referred to as a "dragnet operation." No search warrant has been
published: "And no publicly available federal search warrants filed
in South Florida recently shed light on why agents were there"
This proves how scared Lyin' Biden is of Trump running against him
next year. Ironically, Lyin' Biden was having a pretty good week
(good for the senile bastard, that is) until this ham-fisted move.
On 2022-08-08 18:50, TomS wrote:of documents at Mar-a-Lago were seized w/o ANY review of what they contained. This is referred to as a "dragnet operation." No search warrant has been published:
The senile pervert's Gestapo (aka FBI) raided a FORMER PRESIDENT and likely POLITICAL OPPONENT'S HOME, Mar-a-Lago today. This was done under the guise that they wanted to "preserve presidential records," but they did not elaborate on it. Many boxes
"And no publicly available federal search warrants filed in South Florida recently shed light on why agents were there"
This proves how scared Lyin' Biden is of Trump running against him next year. Ironically, Lyin' Biden was having a pretty good week (good for the senile bastard, that is) until this ham-fisted move.Tell us all, Sunshine:
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:of documents at Mar-a-Lago were seized w/o ANY review of what they contained. This is referred to as a "dragnet operation." No search warrant has been published:
On 2022-08-08 18:50, TomS wrote:
The senile pervert's Gestapo (aka FBI) raided a FORMER PRESIDENT and likely POLITICAL OPPONENT'S HOME, Mar-a-Lago today. This was done under the guise that they wanted to "preserve presidential records," but they did not elaborate on it. Many boxes
"And no publicly available federal search warrants filed in South Florida recently shed light on why agents were there"Tell us all, Sunshine:
This proves how scared Lyin' Biden is of Trump running against him next year. Ironically, Lyin' Biden was having a pretty good week (good for the senile bastard, that is) until this ham-fisted move.
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?
On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
...
Tell us all, Sunshine:
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?
Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
That was a crime.
A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the search.
And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least honest,
and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:59:01 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
...
Tell us all, Sunshine:
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?
Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
That was a crime.“After calling for Hillary Clinton to be jailed, in 2018 Trump
signed a law that stiffened the penalty for the unauthorized
removal and retention of classified documents from one year
to five years, turning it into a felony offense”
<https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/09/why-the-trump-search-warrant-is-nothing-like-hillarys-emails-00050691>
Believe the technical term for this is: "hoisted upon one's own petard".
A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the search.Trump's lawyers have a copy of the warrant, for which they are free
to release it to the public. As such, the "keeping secrets" spin attempt
is duplicitous, as the Fed is required to maintain privacy, which is why
a release of the warrant to the public is the purview of the one served.
And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least honest,
and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?<<crickets>>
Tommy seems to be having problems with the basic US Constitutional
principle that no one is above the law.
Likewise, to assert that a warrant against a former POTUS being unprecedented needs to be viewed in the context that the relevant denominator isn't how many total POTUS's the USA has had, but
rather, how many former POTUS's we've had who've tried to overthrow
the US government. As such, the precedent is "1 for 1" (one warrant
for one insurrectionist).
-hh
On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:of documents at Mar-a-Lago were seized w/o ANY review of what they contained. This is referred to as a "dragnet operation." No search warrant has been published:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-08 18:50, TomS wrote:
The senile pervert's Gestapo (aka FBI) raided a FORMER PRESIDENT and likely POLITICAL OPPONENT'S HOME, Mar-a-Lago today. This was done under the guise that they wanted to "preserve presidential records," but they did not elaborate on it. Many boxes
"And no publicly available federal search warrants filed in South Florida recently shed light on why agents were there"Tell us all, Sunshine:
This proves how scared Lyin' Biden is of Trump running against him next year. Ironically, Lyin' Biden was having a pretty good week (good for the senile bastard, that is) until this ham-fisted move.
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
That was a crime.
A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the search.
And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least honest,
and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 3:59:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:boxes of documents at Mar-a-Lago were seized w/o ANY review of what they contained. This is referred to as a "dragnet operation." No search warrant has been published:
On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-08 18:50, TomS wrote:
The senile pervert's Gestapo (aka FBI) raided a FORMER PRESIDENT and likely POLITICAL OPPONENT'S HOME, Mar-a-Lago today. This was done under the guise that they wanted to "preserve presidential records," but they did not elaborate on it. Many
"And no publicly available federal search warrants filed in South Florida recently shed light on why agents were there"Tell us all, Sunshine:
This proves how scared Lyin' Biden is of Trump running against him next year. Ironically, Lyin' Biden was having a pretty good week (good for the senile bastard, that is) until this ham-fisted move.
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
That was a crime.
A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the search.
And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least honest,
and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?
No, not possible because the President is the final arbiter of what is classified.
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 8:35:54 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 4:59:31 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:59:01 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
...
Tell us all, Sunshine:
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?
Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
That was a crime.“After calling for Hillary Clinton to be jailed, in 2018 Trump
signed a law that stiffened the penalty for the unauthorized
removal and retention of classified documents from one year
to five years, turning it into a felony offense”
<https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/09/why-the-trump-search-warrant-is-nothing-like-hillarys-emails-00050691>
Believe the technical term for this is: "hoisted upon one's own petard".
A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the search.Trump's lawyers have a copy of the warrant, for which they are free
to release it to the public. As such, the "keeping secrets" spin attempt is duplicitous, as the Fed is required to maintain privacy, which is why a release of the warrant to the public is the purview of the one served.
And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least honest, and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?<<crickets>>
Tommy seems to be having problems with the basic US Constitutional principle that no one is above the law.
Likewise, to assert that a warrant against a former POTUS being unprecedented needs to be viewed in the context that the relevant denominator isn't how many total POTUS's the USA has had, but
rather, how many former POTUS's we've had who've tried to overthrow
the US government. As such, the precedent is "1 for 1" (one warrant
for one insurrectionist).
A typical libtard's convoluted justification of an UNJUSTIFIABLE banana republic move.Except for now they already had worked with the Feds months ago, turning over
boxes of govt docs they weren’t authorized to have; this could be as simple as
them lying when they claimed that they had previously turned everything over.
This is going to backfire BIG into the Dim's IQ 50 faces. And WHAT were thoseSince the Trumpets whined about how Trump’s lawyers & staff were not allowed
perverts doing, anyhow, going thru Melania's underwear???
to witness the FBI sweep, how do you know that their claim just isn’t YA lie?
Be specific.
-hh
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 4:59:31 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:59:01 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
...
Tell us all, Sunshine:
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?
Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
That was a crime.“After calling for Hillary Clinton to be jailed, in 2018 Trump
signed a law that stiffened the penalty for the unauthorized
removal and retention of classified documents from one year
to five years, turning it into a felony offense”
<https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/09/why-the-trump-search-warrant-is-nothing-like-hillarys-emails-00050691>
Believe the technical term for this is: "hoisted upon one's own petard".
A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the search.Trump's lawyers have a copy of the warrant, for which they are free
to release it to the public. As such, the "keeping secrets" spin attempt is duplicitous, as the Fed is required to maintain privacy, which is why
a release of the warrant to the public is the purview of the one served.
And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least honest, and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?<<crickets>>
Tommy seems to be having problems with the basic US Constitutional principle that no one is above the law.
Likewise, to assert that a warrant against a former POTUS being unprecedented needs to be viewed in the context that the relevant denominator isn't how many total POTUS's the USA has had, but
rather, how many former POTUS's we've had who've tried to overthrow
the US government. As such, the precedent is "1 for 1" (one warrant
for one insurrectionist).
A typical libtard's convoluted justification of an UNJUSTIFIABLE banana republic move.
This is going to backfire BIG into the Dim's IQ 50 faces. And WHAT were those
perverts doing, anyhow, going thru Melania's underwear???
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 7:19:13 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Believe the technical term for this is: "hoisted upon one's own petard".
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 8:35:54 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 4:59:31 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:59:01 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:“After calling for Hillary Clinton to be jailed, in 2018 Trump
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
... Tell us all, Sunshine:
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?
Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
That was a crime.
signed a law that stiffened the penalty for the unauthorized
removal and retention of classified documents from one year to
five years, turning it into a felony offense”
<https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/09/why-the-trump-search-warrant-is-nothing-like-hillarys-emails-00050691>
Except for now they already had worked with the Feds months ago,A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize theTrump's lawyers have a copy of the warrant, for which they are
search.
free to release it to the public. As such, the "keeping
secrets" spin attempt is duplicitous, as the Fed is required to
maintain privacy, which is why a release of the warrant to the
public is the purview of the one served.
And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least<<crickets>>
honest, and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?
Tommy seems to be having problems with the basic US
Constitutional principle that no one is above the law.
Likewise, to assert that a warrant against a former POTUS
being unprecedented needs to be viewed in the context that the
relevant denominator isn't how many total POTUS's the USA has
had, but rather, how many former POTUS's we've had who've tried
to overthrow the US government. As such, the precedent is "1
for 1" (one warrant for one insurrectionist).
A typical libtard's convoluted justification of an UNJUSTIFIABLE
banana republic move.
turning over boxes of govt docs they weren’t authorized to have;
this could be as simple as them lying when they claimed that they
had previously turned everything over.
This is going to backfire BIG into the Dim's IQ 50 faces. AndSince the Trumpets whined about how Trump’s lawyers & staff were
WHAT were those perverts doing, anyhow, going thru Melania's
underwear???
not allowed to witness the FBI sweep, how do you know that their
claim just isn’t YA lie? Be specific.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, the Feds went thru ALL of these documents in
question in June and APPLAUDED how cooperative Trump was with them.
This RAID was NOT about these documents: it was a FISHING EXPEDITION
looking for ANYTHING that might be used against him.
This is
SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED by the Constitution (you have heard about the Constitution, haven't you?): 1. The Fourth Amendment, search and
seizure. 2. The Fourteenth Amendment, equal protection. and also by
the FBI's OWN RULES: FBI Rule 41
This is backfiring BIG TIME for that senile pervert, Lyin' Biden
On 2022-08-10 19:37, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 7:19:13 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Believe the technical term for this is: "hoisted upon one's own petard". >>>>> A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 8:35:54 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 4:59:31 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:59:01 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:“After calling for Hillary Clinton to be jailed, in 2018 Trump
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
... Tell us all, Sunshine:
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?
Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
That was a crime.
signed a law that stiffened the penalty for the unauthorized
removal and retention of classified documents from one year to
five years, turning it into a felony offense”
<https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/09/why-the-trump-search-warrant-is-nothing-like-hillarys-emails-00050691>
Except for now they already had worked with the Feds months ago,search.Trump's lawyers have a copy of the warrant, for which they are
free to release it to the public. As such, the "keeping
secrets" spin attempt is duplicitous, as the Fed is required to
maintain privacy, which is why a release of the warrant to the
public is the purview of the one served.
And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least<<crickets>>
honest, and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?
Tommy seems to be having problems with the basic US
Constitutional principle that no one is above the law.
Likewise, to assert that a warrant against a former POTUS
being unprecedented needs to be viewed in the context that the
relevant denominator isn't how many total POTUS's the USA has
had, but rather, how many former POTUS's we've had who've tried
to overthrow the US government. As such, the precedent is "1
for 1" (one warrant for one insurrectionist).
A typical libtard's convoluted justification of an UNJUSTIFIABLE
banana republic move.
turning over boxes of govt docs they weren’t authorized to have;
this could be as simple as them lying when they claimed that they
had previously turned everything over.
This is going to backfire BIG into the Dim's IQ 50 faces. AndSince the Trumpets whined about how Trump’s lawyers & staff were
WHAT were those perverts doing, anyhow, going thru Melania's
underwear???
not allowed to witness the FBI sweep, how do you know that their
claim just isn’t YA lie? Be specific.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, the Feds went thru ALL of these documents in
question in June and APPLAUDED how cooperative Trump was with them.
Then you'll surely have a citation for that...
This RAID was NOT about these documents: it was a FISHING EXPEDITION looking for ANYTHING that might be used against him.
And you know this, because...
This is
SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED by the Constitution (you have heard about the Constitution, haven't you?): 1. The Fourth Amendment, search and
seizure. 2. The Fourteenth Amendment, equal protection. and also by
the FBI's OWN RULES: FBI Rule 41
And a federal judge—I've heard a Trump appointee—signed the search warrant.
Care to comment?
No, not possible because the President is the final arbiter of what
is classified.
TomS wrote:
No, not possible because the President is the final arbiter of what
is classified.
That's not how it works, shit for brains; unless there is an official
record of the fat cunt declassifying those specific documents while in
office then they are not and he is open to criminal proceedings.
TomS wrote:
No, not possible because the President is the final arbiter of what
is classified.
That's not how it works, shit for brains; unless there is an official
record of the fat cunt declassifying those specific documents while in office then they are not and he is open to criminal proceedings.
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:31:06 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
No, not possible because the President is the final arbiter of what
is classified.
That's not how it works, shit for brains; unless there is an official record of the fat cunt declassifying those specific documents while in office then they are not and he is open to criminal proceedings.
What Tommy is merely expressing is that he's never had a security clearance to actually know (because mandatory training) just what the rules are.
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 8:05:24 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:31:06 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
No, not possible because the President is the final arbiter of what
is classified.
That's not how it works, shit for brains; unless there is an official
record of the fat cunt declassifying those specific documents while in
office then they are not and he is open to criminal proceedings.
What Tommy is merely expressing is that he's never had a security clearance >> to actually know (because mandatory training) just what the rules are.
Tonight’s hot take:
“ I’m confused: How can Trump be so sure that he declassified the evidence that the FBI planted?”
-hh
On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 1:46:55 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-10 19:37, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 7:19:13 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Believe the technical term for this is: "hoisted upon one's own petard". >>>>>>> A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 8:35:54 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 4:59:31 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:59:01 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:“After calling for Hillary Clinton to be jailed, in 2018 Trump
On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
... Tell us all, Sunshine:
Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?
Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
That was a crime.
signed a law that stiffened the penalty for the unauthorized
removal and retention of classified documents from one year to
five years, turning it into a felony offense”
<https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/09/why-the-trump-search-warrant-is-nothing-like-hillarys-emails-00050691>
Except for now they already had worked with the Feds months ago,search.Trump's lawyers have a copy of the warrant, for which they are
free to release it to the public. As such, the "keeping
secrets" spin attempt is duplicitous, as the Fed is required to
maintain privacy, which is why a release of the warrant to the
public is the purview of the one served.
And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least<<crickets>>
honest, and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?
Tommy seems to be having problems with the basic US
Constitutional principle that no one is above the law.
Likewise, to assert that a warrant against a former POTUS
being unprecedented needs to be viewed in the context that the
relevant denominator isn't how many total POTUS's the USA has
had, but rather, how many former POTUS's we've had who've tried
to overthrow the US government. As such, the precedent is "1
for 1" (one warrant for one insurrectionist).
A typical libtard's convoluted justification of an UNJUSTIFIABLE
banana republic move.
turning over boxes of govt docs they weren’t authorized to have;
this could be as simple as them lying when they claimed that they
had previously turned everything over.
This is going to backfire BIG into the Dim's IQ 50 faces. AndSince the Trumpets whined about how Trump’s lawyers & staff were
WHAT were those perverts doing, anyhow, going thru Melania's
underwear???
not allowed to witness the FBI sweep, how do you know that their
claim just isn’t YA lie? Be specific.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, the Feds went thru ALL of these documents in
question in June and APPLAUDED how cooperative Trump was with them.
Then you'll surely have a citation for that...
This RAID was NOT about these documents: it was a FISHING EXPEDITION
looking for ANYTHING that might be used against him.
And you know this, because...
Ummm...because press releases never contain any lies or spin...? /s
This is
SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED by the Constitution (you have heard about the
Constitution, haven't you?): 1. The Fourth Amendment, search and
seizure. 2. The Fourteenth Amendment, equal protection. and also by
the FBI's OWN RULES: FBI Rule 41
And a federal judge—I've heard a Trump appointee—signed the search warrant.
Care to comment?
"First president to be impeached twice.
First president to attempt a coup d'état.
First president to have his home searched by the FBI.
First president to take the Fifth.
It's just so impressive."
- George Conway <https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1557395603767844864>
In the meantime... <https://twitter.com/scottjshapiro/status/1557380142951014401>
-hh
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 69:47:58 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,715 |