1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.GOLF

  • Secret Service Ludicrous Email Deletion Attempt Baffles Experts - Wa Po

    From bruce bowser@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 29 15:11:44 2022
    Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to bruce bowser on Fri Jul 29 16:38:04 2022
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri Jul 29 16:49:08 2022
    On 2022-07-29 16:38, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.

    Except the courts accepted that she only deleted personal emails.

    Oops.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Jul 29 21:10:28 2022
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:04:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 20:52, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 4:49:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 16:38, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.
    Except the courts accepted that she only deleted personal emails.

    Oops.

    No, I don't think that the courts said any such thing. If they did YOU could produce it.
    If there was evidence that she deleted any work-related emails...

    ...why didn't Trump prosecute her?

    :-)

    Just as I thought: you have NOTHING!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri Jul 29 21:04:21 2022
    On 2022-07-29 20:52, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 4:49:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 16:38, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.
    Except the courts accepted that she only deleted personal emails.

    Oops.

    No, I don't think that the courts said any such thing. If they did YOU could produce it.

    If there was evidence that she deleted any work-related emails...

    ...why didn't Trump prosecute her?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Jul 29 20:52:57 2022
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 4:49:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 16:38, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.
    Except the courts accepted that she only deleted personal emails.

    Oops.

    No, I don't think that the courts said any such thing. If they did YOU could produce it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri Jul 29 21:28:46 2022
    On 2022-07-29 21:10, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:04:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 20:52, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 4:49:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 16:38, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.
    Except the courts accepted that she only deleted personal emails.

    Oops.

    No, I don't think that the courts said any such thing. If they did YOU could produce it.
    If there was evidence that she deleted any work-related emails...

    ...why didn't Trump prosecute her?

    :-)

    Just as I thought: you have NOTHING!

    Apparently it was Trump who had nothing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Jul 30 08:29:26 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    --

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.

    Why would she keep them and WTF does it have to do with Jan 6 events?

    More whataboutism by Boo Hoo. He has no defence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Jul 30 08:08:45 2022
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:28:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 21:10, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:04:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 20:52, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 4:49:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 16:38, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>> Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.
    Except the courts accepted that she only deleted personal emails.

    Oops.

    No, I don't think that the courts said any such thing. If they did YOU could produce it.
    If there was evidence that she deleted any work-related emails...

    ...why didn't Trump prosecute her?

    :-)

    Just as I thought: you have NOTHING!
    Apparently it was Trump who had nothing.

    See, you CAN'T back up your claim.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Jul 30 08:42:47 2022
    On 2022-07-30 08:08, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:28:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 21:10, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:04:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 20:52, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 4:49:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 16:38, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>>>> Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.
    Except the courts accepted that she only deleted personal emails.

    Oops.

    No, I don't think that the courts said any such thing. If they did YOU could produce it.
    If there was evidence that she deleted any work-related emails...

    ...why didn't Trump prosecute her?

    :-)

    Just as I thought: you have NOTHING!
    Apparently it was Trump who had nothing.

    See, you CAN'T back up your claim.

    It was all a deflection by you, anyway.

    The issue at hand is the US Secret Service agents violating government
    policy by deleting their text messages.

    And not just agents, but DHS officials appointed by Trump.

    'According to a document obtained by the Project on Government
    Oversight, text messages for former acting Homeland Security Secretary
    Chad Wolf as well as his deputy, Ken Cuccinelli, could not be located. '

    <https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/3579787-more-missing-texts-this-time-from-trump-dhs-officials-raise-new-jan-6-questions/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bruce bowser@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Jul 30 08:16:44 2022
    On Saturday, July 30, 2022 at 11:08:47 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:28:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 21:10, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:04:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 20:52, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 4:49:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 16:38, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>> Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.
    Except the courts accepted that she only deleted personal emails. >>>>
    Oops.

    No, I don't think that the courts said any such thing. If they did YOU could produce it.
    If there was evidence that she deleted any work-related emails...

    ...why didn't Trump prosecute her?

    :-)

    Just as I thought: you have NOTHING!
    Apparently it was Trump who had nothing.
    See, you CAN'T back up your claim.

    Keep on arguing with The Washington Post TomS, this is a hit!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Jul 30 13:00:56 2022
    On Saturday, July 30, 2022 at 8:42:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-30 08:08, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:28:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 21:10, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 9:04:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 20:52, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 4:49:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-29 16:38, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>>>> Secret Service’s ‘Ludicrous’ Deletion of Jan. 6 Phone Data Baffles Experts
    Washington Post - July 29, 2022
    -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/29/jan6-texts-data-security/

    Almost as ludicrous as Shillary's deletion of 30,000 emails.
    Except the courts accepted that she only deleted personal emails. >>>>>>
    Oops.

    No, I don't think that the courts said any such thing. If they did YOU could produce it.
    If there was evidence that she deleted any work-related emails...

    ...why didn't Trump prosecute her?

    :-)

    Just as I thought: you have NOTHING!
    Apparently it was Trump who had nothing.

    See, you CAN'T back up your claim.
    It was all a deflection by you, anyway.

    The issue at hand is the US Secret Service agents violating government policy by deleting their text messages.

    And not just agents, but DHS officials appointed by Trump.

    'According to a document obtained by the Project on Government
    Oversight, text messages for former acting Homeland Security Secretary
    Chad Wolf as well as his deputy, Ken Cuccinelli, could not be located. '

    <https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/3579787-more-missing-texts-this-time-from-trump-dhs-officials-raise-new-jan-6-questions/>

    Hey Fool, just ADMIT that you made a claim that you CAN'T BACK UP.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)