• Concealed carry holder saves MANY lives at shopping mall

    From TomS@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 18 21:25:33 2022
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Tue Jul 19 10:09:12 2022
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579

    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jul 19 13:33:05 2022
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579

    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?

    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a pistol.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to -hh on Tue Jul 19 15:16:09 2022
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579

    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned down than admit that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Tue Jul 19 15:21:24 2022
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired
    before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of
    destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning
    the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579



    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that a
    rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved MANY
    LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned down than
    admit that.

    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people carrying firearms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jul 21 11:45:52 2022
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:21:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired
    before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of
    destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning
    the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579



    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that a
    rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned down than
    admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people carrying firearms.

    I have five handguns and I shotgun. Where i live many people carry. My wife keeps a 22 magnum in her purse, I have a 44 in my car. The logical consequence you silly old troll is that if some boogie gets in my face, it gets blown off. That simple, it
    happens quite a bit lately. At the local mall a few weeks ago, this teenager, tries to carjack this woman. BOOM BOOM, no more ribs and watermelon for this poor poor boy. Amos will no longer be able to carjack again. That is the logical consequence.
    Lacking a college degree, I can see where this would be a tough concept. We are hear to clarifiy for you and make things more clear. We do understand! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Irving S on Thu Jul 21 12:06:16 2022
    On 2022-07-21 11:45, Irving S wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:21:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    I have five handguns and I shotgun.

    Bully for you, but...

    ...what is "I shotgun"?

    :-)

    Where i live many people carry.

    And where is that?

    :-)

    My wife keeps a 22 magnum in her purse, I have a 44 in my car.

    Bully for both of you!

    But (of course) you mean ".22" and ".44", right?

    The
    logical consequence you silly old troll is that if some boogie gets
    in my face, it gets blown off.

    "Boogie"? What does that mean?

    That simple, it happens quite a bit
    lately. At the local mall a few weeks ago, this teenager, tries to
    carjack this woman.

    Really? Looks like it didn't make the news...

    <https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=attempted+carjacking+woman+mall&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>

    :-)

    BOOM BOOM, no more ribs and watermelon for this
    poor poor boy. Amos will no longer be able to carjack again.

    "Ribs"? "Watermelon"? "Amos"?

    Why those words, Felirving?

    :-)

    That
    is the logical consequence. Lacking a college degree, I can see
    where this would be a tough concept. We are hear to clarifiy for you
    and make things more clear. We do understand!

    Do you understand that when everyone has concealed firearm, and there's
    an incident that has them all reaching for it...

    ...there's going to be carnage?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jul 21 14:03:07 2022
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 3:06:21 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 11:45, Irving S wrote:
    ...
    I have five handguns and I shotgun.

    Bully for you, but...

    ...what is "I shotgun"?
    :-)

    Ain't never heard of an "I" shotgun. What gage or brand is that
    supposed to be? Or was Irving counting on his fingers?


    Where i live many people carry.

    And where is that?
    :-)

    And carry ... what? The water?


    My wife keeps a 22 magnum in her purse, I have a 44 in my car.
    Bully for both of you!

    But (of course) you mean ".22" and ".44", right?

    And also admit that neither appear to be particularly tactical.


    The
    logical consequence you silly old troll is that if some boogie gets
    in my face, it gets blown off.

    "Boogie"? What does that mean?

    "Slang: Disparaging and Offensive. a contemptuous term used to refer to a Black person."


    That simple, it happens quite a bit
    lately. At the local mall a few weeks ago, this teenager, tries to
    carjack this woman.

    Really? Looks like it didn't make the news...

    <https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=attempted+carjacking+woman+mall&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>
    :-)


    BOOM BOOM, no more ribs and watermelon for this
    poor poor boy. Amos will no longer be able to carjack again.

    "Ribs"? "Watermelon"? "Amos"?
    Why those words, Felirving?
    :-)

    He's proud of his racist dogwhistles.


    That
    is the logical consequence. Lacking a college degree, I can see
    where this would be a tough concept. We are hear to clarifiy for you
    and make things more clear. We do understand!

    Do you understand that when everyone has concealed firearm, and there's
    an incident that has them all reaching for it...

    ...there's going to be carnage?

    He's still living under a fantasy that so many gun fetish children have, namely that
    they can be the tactically proficient "good guy" without putting in the time & money
    to maintain perishable skills.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jul 21 16:10:07 2022
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 3:06:21 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 11:45, Irving S wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:21:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    I have five handguns and I shotgun.
    Bully for you, but...

    ...what is "I shotgun"?

    :-)
    Where i live many people carry.
    And where is that?

    :-)
    My wife keeps a 22 magnum in her purse, I have a 44 in my car.
    Bully for both of you!

    But (of course) you mean ".22" and ".44", right?
    The
    logical consequence you silly old troll is that if some boogie gets
    in my face, it gets blown off.
    "Boogie"? What does that mean?
    That simple, it happens quite a bit
    lately. At the local mall a few weeks ago, this teenager, tries to
    carjack this woman.
    Really? Looks like it didn't make the news...

    <https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=attempted+carjacking+woman+mall&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>

    :-)
    BOOM BOOM, no more ribs and watermelon for this
    poor poor boy. Amos will no longer be able to carjack again.
    "Ribs"? "Watermelon"? "Amos"?

    Why those words, Felirving?

    :-)
    That
    is the logical consequence. Lacking a college degree, I can see
    where this would be a tough concept. We are hear to clarifiy for you
    and make things more clear. We do understand!
    Do you understand that when everyone has concealed firearm, and there's
    an incident that has them all reaching for it...

    ...there's going to be carnage?

    You silly old tool. I am probably the least prejudiced person out there, but I did this schtick because I knew the response. Wow, you have no college degree, but I honestly thought you were smarter than that, I was wrong. But then again, what should
    we expect from someone that went to the bank TWICE, and counted money on youtube! The ridicule afterwards was epic. I guess the attention was worth it, I sure don't need attention that badl

    Put the bait out there, you can be 100% assured that the barking seal will respond. And did you ever! I come and go for one thing old man. You are beyond predictable and humerous. I hace a great sense of humor, and I know a clown when I see it.
    Hundreds of thousands of posts, amazing how many of those you actually seen to take yourself seriously, when you are just a tool for the humor of others.

    Great use of time! Thanks for the laughs Grandpa.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Jul 21 16:22:12 2022
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 5:03:09 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 3:06:21 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 11:45, Irving S wrote:
    ...
    I have five handguns and I shotgun.

    Bully for you, but...

    ...what is "I shotgun"?
    :-)
    Ain't never heard of an "I" shotgun. What gage or brand is that
    supposed to be? Or was Irving counting on his fingers?
    Where i live many people carry.

    And where is that?
    :-)
    And carry ... what? The water?
    My wife keeps a 22 magnum in her purse, I have a 44 in my car.
    Bully for both of you!

    But (of course) you mean ".22" and ".44", right?
    And also admit that neither appear to be particularly tactical.
    The
    logical consequence you silly old troll is that if some boogie gets
    in my face, it gets blown off.

    "Boogie"? What does that mean?
    "Slang: Disparaging and Offensive. a contemptuous term used to refer to a Black person."
    That simple, it happens quite a bit
    lately. At the local mall a few weeks ago, this teenager, tries to carjack this woman.

    Really? Looks like it didn't make the news...

    <https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=attempted+carjacking+woman+mall&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8>
    :-)


    BOOM BOOM, no more ribs and watermelon for this
    poor poor boy. Amos will no longer be able to carjack again.

    "Ribs"? "Watermelon"? "Amos"?
    Why those words, Felirving?
    :-)
    He's proud of his racist dogwhistles.
    That
    is the logical consequence. Lacking a college degree, I can see
    where this would be a tough concept. We are hear to clarifiy for you
    and make things more clear. We do understand!

    Do you understand that when everyone has concealed firearm, and there's
    an incident that has them all reaching for it...

    ...there's going to be carnage?
    He's still living under a fantasy that so many gun fetish children have, namely that
    they can be the tactically proficient "good guy" without putting in the time & money
    to maintain perishable skills.


    -hh
    This was all a troll, and you bit just like the combover twit to the north. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Racist dogwhistles? LOL! I am surely not without my prejudices, but have nothing against African American people. I put this out there for a response, did I ever get it. It was a pure troll, and I knew the response. To be so predictable, LOLOL!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for the laugh. You and the tool are in rare form today!

    Neither of you can ignore. It is impossible, whatever drives you I have no idea, but you lack the capacity to ignore. Hilarious, this is pure entertainment and the best news it is all free. I should cancel my cable TV, who needs it when we have Abbott
    and Costello non stop!

    LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jul 21 20:57:29 2022
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired
    before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of
    destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning
    the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579



    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that a
    rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned down than
    admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ shooting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu Jul 21 21:11:19 2022
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.


    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu Jul 21 21:48:11 2022
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.

    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jul 21 21:39:35 2022
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu Jul 21 21:47:32 2022
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:39:36 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.
    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.

    And the whole, sordid list of exchanges is available here: https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/zNw5UZQJdrU/m/xW380br7CgAJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu Jul 21 21:49:27 2022
    On 2022-07-21 21:47, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:39:36 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.
    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.

    And the whole, sordid list of exchanges is available here: https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/zNw5UZQJdrU/m/xW380br7CgAJ

    The word "automatic" doesn't appear in that thread, you pussy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri Jul 22 02:55:44 2022
    On Friday, July 22, 2022 at 12:47:33 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:39:36 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.
    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.

    And the whole, sordid list of exchanges is available here: <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/zNw5UZQJdrU/m/xW380br7CgAJ>

    Funny what specific post it jumped to in that thread for me:

    [quote]
    “It's totally reasonable to argue that the odds of shooting a bad guy without a gun are zero.
    But it's a bit like drinking a steady regimen of Drano to prevent parasites that may not ever
    actually appear. It's not wise, but it could work.

    The reality [is] when you use one to shoot someone, about 99 times out of a 100, you will
    commit a felony, shoot yourself, or shoot someone by accident. In one out of a hundred cases,
    you shoot the bad guy.”
    [/quote]

    From a Risk:Benefit perspective, those aren't good enough odds to make it policy.

    And as I said on *this* thread yesterday:

    "[the] fantasy that so many gun fetish children have [is] that they can be the tactically
    proficient "good guy" without putting in the time & money to maintain perishable skills.

    FWIW, a rule of thumb for proficiency is to fire enough rounds such that it is no longer fun.
    After the initial training curve, that's typically around 1,000/month to maintain. Naturally,
    seeking to maintain perishable skills on more than one platform (eg, pistol and rifle) also
    increases the time & money commitment.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Jul 22 05:32:36 2022
    On Friday, July 22, 2022 at 12:48:13 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Name calling now? Wonder if Barney got online and called people names. Wanna bet on that you silly old man?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri Jul 22 10:02:28 2022
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579

    And the other side of the coin:

    'Back in February 2022, 9-year-old Arlene Alvarez was shot and killed
    while sitting in a car in a parking lot in Harris County, Texas. The
    shooter was a 41-year-old man named Tony Earls. Earls was robbed at
    gunpoint by an as-yet-unknown assailant, and drew his own gun to defend
    himself from the burglar. At some point in the scuffle, Earls
    deliberately shot at the car that he thought belonged to the man trying
    to rob him.

    Turned out, that car belonged to the Alvarez family. And 9-year-old
    Arlene was sitting in the backseat. According to Arlene's mother, Gwen,
    Earls shot at the car least nine times. "Self-defense is not more than
    nine shots," she said. "He knew what he was doing, and he knew he was
    going to intentionally kill whoever was in that vehicle."'

    <https://boingboing.net/2022/07/22/no-charges-for-man-who-killed-9-year-old-girl-while-trying-to-kill-robber.html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri Jul 22 17:03:52 2022
    TomS wrote:

    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired before
    being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of destroys the
    garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning the NZ shooting,
    doesn't it?

    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579

    More guns = more deaths

    It's the unrefutable truth that you claim not to have the intelligence
    to take on board.

    4 people died. It could have been so many more.

    Agreed?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Fri Jul 22 13:21:14 2022
    On Friday, July 22, 2022 at 1:03:54 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds fired before
    being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. Kind of destroys the
    garbage spewed by our local libtards concerning the NZ shooting,
    doesn't it?

    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579
    More guns = more deaths

    It's the unrefutable truth that you claim not to have the intelligence
    to take on board.

    4 people died. It could have been so many more.

    Agreed?

    Bottom line you unemployed dog walking moron, no one is taking our guns away. Never going to happen. So dream on.

    Now do something useful, help mommy with the laundry, you might get a cookie!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Jul 24 20:01:06 2022
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen.
    Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Mon Jul 25 13:23:46 2022
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 4:18:58 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    One armed individual, occasionally, taking on another armed individual.

    You notice the common factor with respect to these killers... that's
    right a gun.

    Less guns, less killings.

    That is the fact that you keep hiding from, pussy.

    Americans simply don't have the mentality to be permitted firearms.

    LOL!

    An unemployed dog walker calling someone else a name. LOL!

    Get over it you pus filled dipshit. No one will take our arms. NO ONE.

    All the whining in the world, the guns stay.

    Go help mommy with the dishes shithead, she might let you have a cookie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Jul 25 20:18:56 2022
    TomS wrote:

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.

    One armed individual, occasionally, taking on another armed individual.

    You notice the common factor with respect to these killers... that's
    right a gun.

    Less guns, less killings.

    That is the fact that you keep hiding from, pussy.

    Americans simply don't have the mentality to be permitted firearms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Jul 25 17:52:45 2022
    On 2022-07-24 20:01, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. >>>>>>>>>> Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards
    concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that
    a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved
    MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have >>>>> made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!

    So you can't.

    Got it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Jul 30 19:53:40 2022
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:52:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-24 20:01, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds
    fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. >>>>>>>>>> Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards >>>>>>>>>> concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that >>>>>>>> a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved >>>>>>> MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned
    down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people
    carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have >>>>> made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in >>>>> taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!
    So you can't.

    Got it.

    Hey, I posted ALL of them, Fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sun Jul 31 13:04:42 2022
    On 2022-07-30 19:53, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:52:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-24 20:01, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds >>>>>>>>>>>> fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. >>>>>>>>>>>> Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards >>>>>>>>>>>> concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that >>>>>>>>>> a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a
    pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved >>>>>>>>> MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned >>>>>>>>> down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people >>>>>>>> carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have >>>>>>> made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in >>>>>>> taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ
    shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!
    So you can't.

    Got it.

    Hey, I posted ALL of them, Fool.

    Nope

    You have yet to post a single quote that you claim is a "false
    statements [I] have made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW
    armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon".

    You haven't... ...because you can't...

    ...because no such claim has ever been made by me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Jul 31 20:18:51 2022
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 1:04:47 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-30 19:53, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:52:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-24 20:01, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds >>>>>>>>>>>> fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. >>>>>>>>>>>> Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards >>>>>>>>>>>> concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that >>>>>>>>>> a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a >>>>>>>>>> pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved >>>>>>>>> MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned >>>>>>>>> down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people >>>>>>>> carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have >>>>>>> made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in >>>>>>> taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ >>>>>>> shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!
    So you can't.

    Got it.

    Hey, I posted ALL of them, Fool.
    Nope

    You have yet to post a single quote that you claim is a "false
    statements [I] have made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW
    armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon".

    You haven't... ...because you can't...

    ...because no such claim has ever been made by me.

    Here is one:

    This gal did an AMAZING job of taking on THREE ARMED INVADERS while
    having to load her gun AND call 9-1-1! Totally INCREDIBLE!

    While shooting badly into the night being lucky not to kill anyone else
    in the neighbourhood.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sun Jul 31 22:18:24 2022
    On 2022-07-31 20:18, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 1:04:47 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-30 19:53, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:52:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-24 20:01, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that >>>>>>>>>>>> a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a >>>>>>>>>>>> pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved >>>>>>>>>>> MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned >>>>>>>>>>> down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people >>>>>>>>>> carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have >>>>>>>>> made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in >>>>>>>>> taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ >>>>>>>>> shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!
    So you can't.

    Got it.

    Hey, I posted ALL of them, Fool.
    Nope

    You have yet to post a single quote that you claim is a "false
    statements [I] have made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW
    armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon".

    You haven't... ...because you can't...

    ...because no such claim has ever been made by me.

    Here is one:

    This gal did an AMAZING job of taking on THREE ARMED INVADERS while
    having to load her gun AND call 9-1-1! Totally INCREDIBLE!

    While shooting badly into the night being lucky not to kill anyone else
    in the neighbourhood.


    Sorry... ...but none of the gunmen in that incident had an automatic
    weapon...

    ...and I was simply pointing out here extremely poor control to shoot
    out her front door when there were other people besides the gunmen she
    could have hit.

    So that's wrong on two counts.

    Try again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Aug 4 16:55:46 2022
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 10:18:27 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-31 20:18, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 1:04:47 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-30 19:53, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:52:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-24 20:01, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that >>>>>>>>>>>> a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a >>>>>>>>>>>> pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved >>>>>>>>>>> MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned >>>>>>>>>>> down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people >>>>>>>>>> carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in >>>>>>>>> taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ >>>>>>>>> shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!
    So you can't.

    Got it.

    Hey, I posted ALL of them, Fool.
    Nope

    You have yet to post a single quote that you claim is a "false
    statements [I] have made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW
    armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon".

    You haven't... ...because you can't...

    ...because no such claim has ever been made by me.

    Here is one:

    This gal did an AMAZING job of taking on THREE ARMED INVADERS while
    having to load her gun AND call 9-1-1! Totally INCREDIBLE!

    While shooting badly into the night being lucky not to kill anyone else
    in the neighbourhood.

    Sorry... ...but none of the gunmen in that incident had an automatic weapon...

    ...and I was simply pointing out here extremely poor control to shoot
    out her front door when there were other people besides the gunmen she
    could have hit.

    So that's wrong on two counts.

    Try again.

    You did not explain why you KNEW she was shooting "badly" or was "lucky not to kill anyone else." in the neighbourhood"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri Aug 5 12:06:25 2022
    On 2022-08-04 16:55, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 10:18:27 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-31 20:18, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 1:04:47 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-30 19:53, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:52:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-24 20:01, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out...

    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved >>>>>>>>>>>>> MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned >>>>>>>>>>>>> down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true?

    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people >>>>>>>>>>>> carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in >>>>>>>>>>> taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ >>>>>>>>>>> shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!
    So you can't.

    Got it.

    Hey, I posted ALL of them, Fool.
    Nope

    You have yet to post a single quote that you claim is a "false
    statements [I] have made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW
    armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon".

    You haven't... ...because you can't...

    ...because no such claim has ever been made by me.

    Here is one:

    This gal did an AMAZING job of taking on THREE ARMED INVADERS while
    having to load her gun AND call 9-1-1! Totally INCREDIBLE!

    While shooting badly into the night being lucky not to kill anyone else
    in the neighbourhood.

    Sorry... ...but none of the gunmen in that incident had an automatic
    weapon...

    ...and I was simply pointing out here extremely poor control to shoot
    out her front door when there were other people besides the gunmen she
    could have hit.

    So that's wrong on two counts.

    Try again.

    You did not explain why you KNEW she was shooting "badly" or was "lucky not to kill anyone else." in the neighbourhood"

    The video shows her firing her gun out her front door, Sunshine?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Aug 6 20:03:58 2022
    On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 12:06:28 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-04 16:55, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 10:18:27 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-31 20:18, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 1:04:47 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-30 19:53, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:52:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-24 20:01, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved >>>>>>>>>>>>> MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned >>>>>>>>>>>>> down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true? >>>>>>>>>>>>
    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people >>>>>>>>>>>> carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ >>>>>>>>>>> shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!
    So you can't.

    Got it.

    Hey, I posted ALL of them, Fool.
    Nope

    You have yet to post a single quote that you claim is a "false
    statements [I] have made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW
    armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon".

    You haven't... ...because you can't...

    ...because no such claim has ever been made by me.

    Here is one:

    This gal did an AMAZING job of taking on THREE ARMED INVADERS while
    having to load her gun AND call 9-1-1! Totally INCREDIBLE!

    While shooting badly into the night being lucky not to kill anyone else >>> in the neighbourhood.

    Sorry... ...but none of the gunmen in that incident had an automatic
    weapon...

    ...and I was simply pointing out here extremely poor control to shoot
    out her front door when there were other people besides the gunmen she
    could have hit.

    So that's wrong on two counts.

    Try again.

    You did not explain why you KNEW she was shooting "badly" or was "lucky not to kill anyone else." in the neighbourhood"
    The video shows her firing her gun out her front door, Sunshine?

    There you go - that's ALL it shows! No evidence whatsoever of firing "badly" or at neighbors, proof of your LIES!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Aug 6 22:40:16 2022
    On 2022-08-06 20:03, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 12:06:28 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-04 16:55, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 10:18:27 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-31 20:18, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 1:04:47 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-30 19:53, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:52:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-07-24 20:01, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:48:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-21 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 9:11:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-21 20:57, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 3:21:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-19 15:16, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 1:09:15 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-18 21:25, TomS wrote:
    The perp, however, managed to kill three with 24 rounds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fired before being taken out by the legally-armed citizen. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind of destroys the garbage spewed by our local libtards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerning the NZ shooting, doesn't it?
    https://www.wlwt.com/article/greenwood-park-mall-mass-shooting-indiana/40635579





    And when everyone has a gun and has them out... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    ...who starts shooting whom?
    I was thinking about how it shows nearly 400 Texas LEO's that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a rifle-armed perp can indeed be neutralized with only a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pistol.


    -hh

    LOL! You libtards just can't ADMIT that the guy obviously saved >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MANY LIVES!! I think you would have rather seen dozens gunned >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down than admit that.
    What need is there to "admit" what is obviously true? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I'm asking about the logical consequences of having many people >>>>>>>>>>>>>> carrying firearms.

    What you have to "admit" to are all of the false statements you have
    made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW armed individual in
    taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon, particularly the NZ >>>>>>>>>>>>> shooting.
    Post just one example.

    You can't.

    Because you just made that up.

    Hey, YOU wrote the shit.
    So give us just one quote, you pussy.

    Hey, read your OWN fucking posts, asshole!
    So you can't.

    Got it.

    Hey, I posted ALL of them, Fool.
    Nope

    You have yet to post a single quote that you claim is a "false
    statements [I] have made in the past regarding the ability of a CCW >>>>>> armed individual in taking on a gunman with a automatic weapon".

    You haven't... ...because you can't...

    ...because no such claim has ever been made by me.

    Here is one:

    This gal did an AMAZING job of taking on THREE ARMED INVADERS while >>>>>> having to load her gun AND call 9-1-1! Totally INCREDIBLE!

    While shooting badly into the night being lucky not to kill anyone else >>>>> in the neighbourhood.

    Sorry... ...but none of the gunmen in that incident had an automatic
    weapon...

    ...and I was simply pointing out here extremely poor control to shoot
    out her front door when there were other people besides the gunmen she >>>> could have hit.

    So that's wrong on two counts.

    Try again.

    You did not explain why you KNEW she was shooting "badly" or was "lucky not to kill anyone else." in the neighbourhood"
    The video shows her firing her gun out her front door, Sunshine?

    There you go - that's ALL it shows! No evidence whatsoever of firing "badly" or at neighbors, proof of your LIES!

    It was fired outward from her home with no backstop at all.

    Since at that point, the suspects were running away, she had no reason
    to continue firing and any shot she took that didn't hit the suspects
    had the chance to hit someone else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)