...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 11:00:59 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.LOL!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf
This has been all over the news Peckerhead. What are you telling us that is not already on the news everywhere. Do you need attention that bad?
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 2:00:29 PM UTC-6, Irving S wrote:
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 11:00:59 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.LOL!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf
This has been all over the news Peckerhead. What are you telling us that is not already on the news everywhere. Do you need attention that bad?No, do you?
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given
the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
TomS wrote:
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given
the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you
feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo.
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given
the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you
feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo.I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is
that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted
in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances
of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy...
even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the
law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations.
-hh
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:if they start with us. the shots will be returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform at will, and the citizens sit back with
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given
the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you
feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo.
point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is
that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted
in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically
connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances
of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should >> be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo >> which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy...
even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the
law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate >> justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations.
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left, what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these savages know that
Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws that have been passed and will be passed are just lip service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against criminal scumbags,rioting scumbags, and a govt all to willing to take our rights away.
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see what the response will be.
On 2022-06-27 13:51, Irving S wrote:they start with us. the shots will be returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform at will, and the citizens sit back with their
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good >> point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given
the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you >>> feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo.
that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted
in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically
connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances
of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should
be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo
which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy... >> even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the
law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate
justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations. >>
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left, what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these savages know that if
rioting scumbags, and a govt all to willing to take our rights away.Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws that have been passed and will be passed are just lip service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against criminal scumbags,
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see what the response will be.
You really don't want to look too closely at which states have the most firearms deaths per capita...
On 2022-06-27 13:51, Irving S wrote:they start with us. the shots will be returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform at will, and the citizens sit back with their
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good >> point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given
the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you >>> feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo.
that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted
in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically
connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances
of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should
be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo
which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy... >> even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the
law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate
justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations. >>
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left, what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these savages know that if
rioting scumbags, and a govt all to willing to take our rights away.Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws that have been passed and will be passed are just lip service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against criminal scumbags,
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see what the response will be.
You really don't want to look too closely at which states have the most firearms deaths per capita...
On 2022-06-27 13:51, Irving S wrote:they start with us. the shots will be returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform at will, and the citizens sit back with their
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good >> point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given
the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you >>> feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo.
that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted
in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically
connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances
of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should
be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo
which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy... >> even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the
law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate
justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations. >>
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left, what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these savages know that if
rioting scumbags, and a govt all to willing to take our rights away.Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws that have been passed and will be passed are just lip service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against criminal scumbags,
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see what the response will be.
You really don't want to look too closely at which states have the most firearms deaths per capita...
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 4:56:51 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:if they start with us. the shots will be returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform at will, and the citizens sit back with
On 2022-06-27 13:51, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good >> point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given >>>> the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you >>> feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo.
that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted >> in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically >> connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances >> of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should
be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo
which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy... >> even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the >> law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate
justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations. >>
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left, what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these savages know that
rioting scumbags, and a govt all to willing to take our rights away.Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws that have been passed and will be passed are just lip service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against criminal scumbags,
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see what the response will be.
You really don't want to look too closely at which states have the most firearms deaths per capita...Or how nearly half of guns used in crimes came from the underground economy, were
stolen from owners who bragged about having guns.
Or how many rural areas have higher per capita rates of violence than many cities.
Of course it also goes without passing how I said that this overturned a bad law…because
they didn’t understand the point of why it was bad.
In the meantime, a data analysis from Denmark, n= 1 million people:
the risk of Alzheimer's after a SarsCov2 infection increased by 350%; Parkinson's +260%, stroke 270% and a +480% risk of bleeding in the brain.
-hh
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 4:56:51 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:if they start with us. the shots will be returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform at will, and the citizens sit back with
On 2022-06-27 13:51, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good >> point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given >>>> the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you >>> feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo.
that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted >> in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically >> connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances >> of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should
be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo
which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy... >> even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the >> law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate
justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations. >>
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left, what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these savages know that
rioting scumbags, and a govt all to willing to take our rights away.Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws that have been passed and will be passed are just lip service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against criminal scumbags,
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see what the response will be.
You really don't want to look too closely at which states have the most firearms deaths per capita...Or how nearly half of guns used in crimes came from the underground economy, were
stolen from owners who bragged about having guns.
Or how many rural areas have higher per capita rates of violence than many cities.
Of course it also goes without passing how I said that this overturned a bad law…because
they didn’t understand the point of why it was bad.
In the meantime, a data analysis from Denmark, n= 1 million people:
the risk of Alzheimer's after a SarsCov2 infection increased by 350%; Parkinson's +260%, stroke 270% and a +480% risk of bleeding in the brain.
-hh
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 5:31:29 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:they start with us. the shots will be returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform at will, and the citizens sit back with their
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 4:56:51 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-06-27 13:51, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good >>>>> point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need for
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given >>>>>>> the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you >>>>>> feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo.
that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted >>>>> in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically >>>>> connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances >>>>> of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should
be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo
which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy... >>>>> even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the >>>>> law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate
justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations. >>>>>
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left, what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these savages know that if
rioting scumbags, and a govt all to willing to take our rights away.
Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws that have been passed and will be passed are just lip service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against criminal scumbags,
Or how nearly half of guns used in crimes came from the underground economy, wereYou really don't want to look too closely at which states have the most
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see what the response will be.
firearms deaths per capita...
stolen from owners who bragged about having guns.
Or how many rural areas have higher per capita rates of violence than many cities.
Of course it also goes without passing how I said that this overturned a bad law…because
they didn’t understand the point of why it was bad.
In the meantime, a data analysis from Denmark, n= 1 million people:
the risk of Alzheimer's after a SarsCov2 infection increased by 350%;
Parkinson's +260%, stroke 270% and a +480% risk of bleeding in the brain.
-hh
I know little about all this medical stuff,...
On 2022-06-27 15:09, Irving S wrote:if they start with us. the shots will be returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform at will, and the citizens sit back with
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 5:31:29 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 4:56:51 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-06-27 13:51, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is >>>>> that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted >>>>> in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically >>>>> connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances >>>>> of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need forToo stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you >>>>>> feel the need to carry a gun.
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given >>>>>>> the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear. >>>>>>
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo. >>>>> I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good
be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo
which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy...
even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the >>>>> law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate
justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations.
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left, what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these savages know that
rioting scumbags, and a govt all to willing to take our rights away.
Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws that have been passed and will be passed are just lip service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against criminal scumbags,
Or how nearly half of guns used in crimes came from the underground economy, wereYou really don't want to look too closely at which states have the most >>> firearms deaths per capita...
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see what the response will be.
stolen from owners who bragged about having guns.
Or how many rural areas have higher per capita rates of violence than many cities.
Of course it also goes without passing how I said that this overturned a bad law…because
they didn’t understand the point of why it was bad.
In the meantime, a data analysis from Denmark, n= 1 million people:
the risk of Alzheimer's after a SarsCov2 infection increased by 350%;
Parkinson's +260%, stroke 270% and a +480% risk of bleeding in the brain. >>
-hh
I know little about all this medical stuff,...
That is obvious.
On 2022-06-27 15:09, Irving S wrote:if they start with us. the shots will be returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform at will, and the citizens sit back with
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 5:31:29 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 4:56:51 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-06-27 13:51, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:point too. One of the problems that some local gun laws have had is >>>>> that they were conveniently vague on certain standards which resulted >>>>> in them more becoming a question of if the applicant were politically >>>>> connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we see instances >>>>> of these "rules for thee, not for me", and on that basis, such stuff should
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a need forToo stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry guns is why you >>>>>> feel the need to carry a gun.
self-protection that exceeds that of the general population. Given >>>>>>> the runaway crime in NY that is an impossibly high bar to clear. >>>>>>
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old fart, Boo Hoo. >>>>> I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the above is a good
be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage, so the status quo
which is more qualitative instead of quantitative is convenient/lazy...
even though it can be more reliable/accurate at times. But because the >>>>> law is supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't an adequate
justification for not writing concise, legally enforceable regulations.
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left, what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these savages know that
rioting scumbags, and a govt all to willing to take our rights away.
Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws that have been passed and will be passed are just lip service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against criminal scumbags,
Or how nearly half of guns used in crimes came from the underground economy, wereYou really don't want to look too closely at which states have the most >>> firearms deaths per capita...
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see what the response will be.
stolen from owners who bragged about having guns.
Or how many rural areas have higher per capita rates of violence than many cities.
Of course it also goes without passing how I said that this overturned a bad law…because
they didn’t understand the point of why it was bad.
In the meantime, a data analysis from Denmark, n= 1 million people:
the risk of Alzheimer's after a SarsCov2 infection increased by 350%;
Parkinson's +260%, stroke 270% and a +480% risk of bleeding in the brain. >>
-hh
I know little about all this medical stuff,...
That is obvious.
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 9:44:29 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-06-27 15:09, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 5:31:29 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 4:56:51 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-06-27 13:51, Irving S wrote:Or how nearly half of guns used in crimes came from the
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 7:33:57 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:You really don't want to look too closely at which states
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:48:53 PM UTC-4, Bigbird
wrote:
TomS wrote:I've not read too deeply on the NY ruling, although the
...requiring applicants to prove that they have a
need for self-protection that exceeds that of the
general population. Given the runaway crime in NY
that is an impossibly high bar to clear.
Too stupid to realise that allowing everyone to carry
guns is why you feel the need to carry a gun.
You truly are just a low intelligence, demented old
fart, Boo Hoo.
above is a good point too. One of the problems that some
local gun laws have had is that they were conveniently
vague on certain standards which resulted in them more
becoming a question of if the applicant were politically
connected more than if they had merit: far too often, we
see instances of these "rules for thee, not for me", and
on that basis, such stuff should be struck down.
But the topic of 'trustworthiness' is a hard one to gage,
so the status quo which is more qualitative instead of
quantitative is convenient/lazy... even though it can be
more reliable/accurate at times. But because the law is
supposed to treat us all as equals, "convenience" isn't
an adequate justification for not writing concise,
legally enforceable regulations.
-hh
The NY decision was a good one. You poor Bozos to the left,
what a beating you have had the last two weeks. BOO HOO
HOO. Get used to i.
It is very interesting, I live in an area where we are all
heavily armed. I own a shotgun and 4 handguns. Hope to
never use it. We have very little crime, and we never have
any riots. NONE. Not one fucking riot!!!! Because these
savages know that if they start with us. the shots will be
returned. We do not want violence, would avoid it at all
costs, but we WILL fight back. Unlike these pussy blue
cities and states where crime is rampant, rioters perform
at will, and the citizens sit back with their fingers up
their asses doing nothing. You all sit back and do nothing,
your DAs do nothing, and your police are afraid to do
anything.
Criminals can get guns anytime they want. The guns do not
shoot themselves, criminals shoot it. Any and all gun laws
that have been passed and will be passed are just lip
service. We need the 2nd amendment to protect us against
criminal scumbags, rioting scumbags, and a govt all to
willing to take our rights away.
Get used to it. No one is taking our guns away. Try it, see
what the response will be.
have the most firearms deaths per capita...
underground economy, were stolen from owners who bragged about
having guns.
Or how many rural areas have higher per capita rates of
violence than many cities.
Of course it also goes without passing how I said that this
overturned a bad law…because they didn’t understand the point
of why it was bad.
In the meantime, a data analysis from Denmark, n= 1 million
people: the risk of Alzheimer's after a SarsCov2 infection
increased by 350%; Parkinson's +260%, stroke 270% and a +480%
risk of bleeding in the brain.
-hh
I know little about all this medical stuff,...
That is obvious.
I dont claim to be an expert about medical stuff, but I have one
thing a lot of you lack, and that is common sense. And unlike you,
having a college degree, I know how to look up things fast , and I
learn fast. I have a daughter that is an ER RN, and she has seen
dozens of people come in with jab related injuries. I talk to MDS
who are members at my club. They talk freely there, unlike at work
they have to stay on script. I know not to trust people that are
full of shit. And everyone associated with this poison is full of
shit.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 60:55:11 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,355,765 |