• OT: Well, it wasn't racing, but it was fun

    From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 20 08:11:38 2022
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to
    people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri May 20 15:56:25 2022
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to
    people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added. >>
    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it. >>
    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri May 20 15:40:56 2022
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to
    people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri May 20 19:05:45 2022
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach >> with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to
    people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan >> 370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up >> on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the >> limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone >> needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two >> of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with >> me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more >> laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and >> also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed >> to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri May 20 19:17:39 2022
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach >>>> with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to
    people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan >>>> 370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch >>>> for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up >>>> on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the >>>> limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone >>>> needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver. >>>> One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two >>>> of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with >>>> me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more >>>> laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and >>>> also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed >>>> to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out. >>
    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.

    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually
    racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles.


    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…

    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri May 20 20:46:18 2022
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach >>>> with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to
    people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch >>>> for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some >>>> insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started >>>> under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the >>>> limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's >>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple >>>> who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone >>>> needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver. >>>> One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two >>>> of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more >>>> laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and >>>> also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer >>>> for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri May 20 21:39:28 2022
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach >>>>>> with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch >>>>>> for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some >>>>>> insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started >>>>>> under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up >>>>>> on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the >>>>>> limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's >>>>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple >>>>>> who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone >>>>>> needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver. >>>>>> One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two >>>>>> of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with >>>>>> me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more >>>>>> laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and >>>>>> also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer >>>>>> for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed >>>>>> to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the >>>> Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner >>> deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually
    racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.

    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you
    tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat May 21 04:54:34 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some >>>>>> insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started >>>>>> under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's >>>>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple >>>>>> who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer >>>>>> for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the >>>> Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner >>> deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually
    racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you
    tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum considerations too.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Sat May 21 08:01:51 2022
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch >>>>>>>> for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some >>>>>>>> insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started >>>>>>>> under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's >>>>>>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple >>>>>>>> who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver. >>>>>>>> One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer >>>>>>>> for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the >>>>>> Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner >>>>> deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually >>>> racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you
    tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum considerations too.

    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of the
    ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat May 21 10:34:04 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 11:01:55 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually >>>> racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles. >>>>>
    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you >> tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    That would be correct in an airplane. I have done the kind of demo racing you discussed on a short oval in a NASCAR Modified class race car. It was a birthday present from the wife. Lot's of fun, and I did not spin out. Top speed was about 110-120. So's
    driving for miles and miles at 120 or more in Germany!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Sat May 21 11:48:33 2022
    On 2022-05-21 10:34 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 11:01:55 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next
    time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of
    the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    That would be correct in an airplane. I have done the kind of demo
    racing you discussed on a short oval in a NASCAR Modified class race
    car.

    Try it on a road course.

    It was a birthday present from the wife. Lot's of fun, and I did
    not spin out.

    Because you weren't actually close to the limit.

    Top speed was about 110-120.

    As I said.

    So's driving for miles and
    miles at 120 or more in Germany!

    Driving for miles and miles on a highway is not very much fun at any
    speed...

    ...but being allowed to do it at a higher speed does get it done with
    sooner.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat May 21 21:16:17 2022
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some >>>>>> insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started >>>>>> under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's >>>>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple >>>>>> who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer >>>>>> for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the >>>> Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner >>> deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually
    racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you
    tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking retard!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat May 21 21:19:59 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually >>>> racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles. >>>>>
    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you >> tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat May 21 21:22:29 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to
    people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually
    racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles. >>>>>
    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you >> tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    Hey Fool, you REALLY need to educate yourself about flying; what happens if you spin out? Now, look up what happens in the same situation to an aircraft.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat May 21 22:06:40 2022
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch >>>>>>>> for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some >>>>>>>> insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started >>>>>>>> under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's >>>>>>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple >>>>>>>> who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver. >>>>>>>> One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer >>>>>>>> for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the >>>>>> Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner >>>>> deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually >>>> racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you
    tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking retard!!

    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in comparison
    to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and I'm
    usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically leave
    3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet from
    the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're doing it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat May 21 22:09:52 2022
    On 2022-05-21 9:19 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next
    time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of
    the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You obviously
    aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what is
    involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.


    I mostly drive on flat ground... ...but Pacific Raceways in Seattle
    isn't nearly so flat...

    ...and the walls are usually much less than a car's width away at
    multiple points of every lap.

    Dude...

    ...no one would point to flying a glider as being nearly as difficult or
    risky as driving a road racing car in anger.

    Give it up before you look any more stupid than you usually do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat May 21 22:11:36 2022
    On 2022-05-21 9:22 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences"
    to people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under
    wet conditions, but got a lot better later on
    until we finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid
    with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in
    the worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's throttle pedal is not very progressive),
    and there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost
    everyone needed some demonstration of just how
    hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with
    about 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in
    two of the cars (I think she went out in the
    Mustang after her first go with me in the Camaro)
    asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two
    more laps to really see what the car could do. I
    think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see
    what they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe
    next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one
    so that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the
    old “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious
    for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old
    pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the edge
    of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away
    from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet
    of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You
    obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what
    is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    Hey Fool, you REALLY need to educate yourself about flying; what
    happens if you spin out? Now, look up what happens in the same
    situation to an aircraft.


    Because the two words don't mean nearly the same thing in the different contexts...

    ...and furthermore, to drive a racing car fast, you have to risk
    spinning in pretty much every corner, whereas in an aircraft
    (particularly a sailplane or glider), you actively avoid the flight
    regime where entering a spin is even possible.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun May 22 13:31:17 2022
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 1:11:38 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:22 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences"
    to people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under
    wet conditions, but got a lot better later on
    until we finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid
    with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in
    the worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's throttle pedal is not very progressive),
    and there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost
    everyone needed some demonstration of just how
    hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with
    about 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in
    two of the cars (I think she went out in the
    Mustang after her first go with me in the Camaro)
    asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two
    more laps to really see what the car could do. I
    think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see
    what they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe
    next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one >>>>>>>>>> so that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the
    old “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious
    for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old
    pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the edge
    of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away
    from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet
    of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You
    obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what
    is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    Hey Fool, you REALLY need to educate yourself about flying; what
    happens if you spin out? Now, look up what happens in the same
    situation to an aircraft.
    Because the two words don't mean nearly the same thing in the different contexts...

    ...and furthermore, to drive a racing car fast, you have to risk
    spinning in pretty much every corner, whereas in an aircraft
    (particularly a sailplane or glider), you actively avoid the flight
    regime where entering a spin is even possible.

    To each there own, I could think of a more boring way to spend time and waste money. Going around a race track fast, Wow!

    Now Alan dear I am not talking about you personally, but I will cite a study clearly showing an inverse relationship between penis size and the ownership of fast cars. The need to go fast seems to be a compensation for what some are lacking.

    I went to a race once. Majority of spectators were ignorant rednecks, average IQ will below 70. Got no time to be around such trash, but again old man, to each their own.

    The happiness you gave these people, taking them on the journey around the track, so touching. Brought tears to my eyes. The cancer survivor, wow the happiness she must have experienced. I will never know, I got better things to do than go fast and go
    round and round. But to each their own, yes indeed!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Irving S on Sun May 22 13:44:09 2022
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 3:31:18 PM UTC-5, Irving S wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 1:11:38 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:22 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences"
    to people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under
    wet conditions, but got a lot better later on
    until we finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid
    with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in
    the worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's throttle pedal is not very progressive),
    and there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost
    everyone needed some demonstration of just how
    hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with
    about 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in
    two of the cars (I think she went out in the
    Mustang after her first go with me in the Camaro)
    asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two
    more laps to really see what the car could do. I
    think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see
    what they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe
    next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one >>>>>>>>>> so that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the
    old “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious >>>>>>>> for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old
    pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the edge
    of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away
    from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet
    of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You
    obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what
    is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    Hey Fool, you REALLY need to educate yourself about flying; what
    happens if you spin out? Now, look up what happens in the same
    situation to an aircraft.
    Because the two words don't mean nearly the same thing in the different contexts...

    ...and furthermore, to drive a racing car fast, you have to risk
    spinning in pretty much every corner, whereas in an aircraft
    (particularly a sailplane or glider), you actively avoid the flight
    regime where entering a spin is even possible.

    To each there own, I could think of a more boring way to spend time and waste money. Going around a race track fast, Wow!

    It’s always a YMMV. Some enjoy jumping out of airplanes, others
    golf, etc.

    Now Alan dear I am not talking about you personally, but I will cite
    a study clearly showing an inverse relationship between penis size
    and the ownership of fast cars. The need to go fast seems to be a compensation for what some are lacking.

    When you finally get around to finding that cite, make sure it’s the same one that also addresses people who think buying fancier gear is the end-all to fitness and muscle memory development for the arbitrary benefit of maybe
    a better stroke or two here or there.


    I went to a race once. Majority of spectators were ignorant rednecks, average IQ will below 70. Got no time to be around such trash, but again old man, to each their own.

    Yup, that’s NASCAR style events. Try a version that’s not based on prohibition.


    The happiness you gave these people, taking them on the journey around
    the track, so touching. Brought tears to my eyes. The cancer survivor, wow
    the happiness she must have experienced. I will never know, I got better things to do than go fast and go round and round. But to each their own,
    yes indeed!

    It’s a document-drama, but do consider the clip in “Ford vs Ferrari” where
    Carol Shelby gives Henry Ford Jr a hot lap to explain what he got for his $9M.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun May 22 13:49:27 2022
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 4:44:10 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 3:31:18 PM UTC-5, Irving S wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 1:11:38 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:22 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences"
    to people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under
    wet conditions, but got a lot better later on
    until we finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid
    with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in
    the worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's throttle pedal is not very progressive), >>>>>>>>>>> and there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost
    everyone needed some demonstration of just how
    hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with
    about 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in
    two of the cars (I think she went out in the
    Mustang after her first go with me in the Camaro) >>>>>>>>>>> asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two
    more laps to really see what the car could do. I
    think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see
    what they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe >>>>>>>>>> next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one >>>>>>>>>> so that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the
    old “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious >>>>>>>> for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old
    pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the edge
    of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away
    from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet
    of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You
    obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what
    is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    Hey Fool, you REALLY need to educate yourself about flying; what happens if you spin out? Now, look up what happens in the same situation to an aircraft.
    Because the two words don't mean nearly the same thing in the different contexts...

    ...and furthermore, to drive a racing car fast, you have to risk spinning in pretty much every corner, whereas in an aircraft (particularly a sailplane or glider), you actively avoid the flight regime where entering a spin is even possible.

    To each there own, I could think of a more boring way to spend time and waste money. Going around a race track fast, Wow!
    It’s always a YMMV. Some enjoy jumping out of airplanes, others
    golf, etc.

    Now Alan dear I am not talking about you personally, but I will cite
    a study clearly showing an inverse relationship between penis size
    and the ownership of fast cars. The need to go fast seems to be a compensation for what some are lacking.
    When you finally get around to finding that cite, make sure it’s the same one
    that also addresses people who think buying fancier gear is the end-all to fitness and muscle memory development for the arbitrary benefit of maybe
    a better stroke or two here or there.

    I went to a race once. Majority of spectators were ignorant rednecks, average
    IQ will below 70. Got no time to be around such trash, but again old man, to
    each their own.
    Yup, that’s NASCAR style events. Try a version that’s not based on prohibition.

    The happiness you gave these people, taking them on the journey around
    the track, so touching. Brought tears to my eyes. The cancer survivor, wow the happiness she must have experienced. I will never know, I got better things to do than go fast and go round and round. But to each their own, yes indeed!
    It’s a document-drama, but do consider the clip in “Ford vs Ferrari” where
    Carol Shelby gives Henry Ford Jr a hot lap to explain what he got for his $9M.

    -hh

    LOL!

    The Jersey clown to the rescue. Good job. Predictable as predictable gets.

    Why are you not in your closet hiding? Won't be long before that homely prick you call a governor will have you all quaranteed because of the monkey virus!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Irving S on Sun May 22 18:03:58 2022
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 3:49:28 PM UTC-5, Irving S wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 4:44:10 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 3:31:18 PM UTC-5, Irving S wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 1:11:38 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:22 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" >>>>>>>>>>> to people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an >>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for >>>>>>>>>>> the passenger seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people >>>>>>>>>>> huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under
    wet conditions, but got a lot better later on
    until we finished up on a completely dry track. >>>>>>>>>>>
    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid
    with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in >>>>>>>>>>> the worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's throttle pedal is not very progressive), >>>>>>>>>>> and there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost >>>>>>>>>>> everyone needed some demonstration of just how
    hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with
    about 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in
    two of the cars (I think she went out in the
    Mustang after her first go with me in the Camaro) >>>>>>>>>>> asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two >>>>>>>>>>> more laps to really see what the car could do. I >>>>>>>>>>> think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, >>>>>>>>>>> warming up the car and also recording some video >>>>>>>>>>> for tutorial video for the company to offer for >>>>>>>>>>> those coming to the next event to actually see
    what they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe >>>>>>>>>> next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one >>>>>>>>>> so that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the
    old “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious >>>>>>>> for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & >>>>>>>> the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old
    pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the edge >>>>>>> of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer >>>>>>>> rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... >>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away
    from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet >>> of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You
    obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what >> is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    Hey Fool, you REALLY need to educate yourself about flying; what happens if you spin out? Now, look up what happens in the same situation to an aircraft.
    Because the two words don't mean nearly the same thing in the different
    contexts...

    ...and furthermore, to drive a racing car fast, you have to risk spinning in pretty much every corner, whereas in an aircraft (particularly a sailplane or glider), you actively avoid the flight regime where entering a spin is even possible.

    To each there own, I could think of a more boring way to spend time and waste money. Going around a race track fast, Wow!

    It’s always a YMMV. Some enjoy jumping out of airplanes, others
    golf, etc.

    Now Alan dear I am not talking about you personally, but I will cite
    a study clearly showing an inverse relationship between penis size
    and the ownership of fast cars. The need to go fast seems to be a compensation for what some are lacking.

    When you finally get around to finding that cite, make sure it’s the same one
    that also addresses people who think buying fancier gear is the end-all to fitness and muscle memory development for the arbitrary benefit of maybe
    a better stroke or two here or there.

    I went to a race once. Majority of spectators were ignorant rednecks, average
    IQ will below 70. Got no time to be around such trash, but again old man, to
    each their own.

    Yup, that’s NASCAR style events. Try a version that’s not based on prohibition.

    The happiness you gave these people, taking them on the journey around the track, so touching. Brought tears to my eyes. The cancer survivor, wow
    the happiness she must have experienced. I will never know, I got better things to do than go fast and go round and round. But to each their own, yes indeed!

    It’s a document-drama, but do consider the clip in “Ford vs Ferrari” where
    Carol Shelby gives Henry Ford Jr a hot lap to explain what he got for his $9M.

    -hh

    LOL!

    The Jersey clown to the rescue. Good job. Predictable as predictable gets.

    So…does this mean you *still* can’t find that alleged cite?

    Why are you not in your closet hiding? Won't be long before that homely prick
    you call a governor will have you all quaranteed because of the monkey virus!

    Oh, you finally figured out that I’m not hiding? What was it that tipped you off?
    BTW, good day out today, plus grilled a nice tenderloin this evening. Would have
    been nice to have been al fresco for the rest of the dinner with a decent French
    blush, but the Sahara dusts held down the sunset view. But there’s tomorrow...

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun May 22 19:04:32 2022
    On 2022-05-22 6:03 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 3:49:28 PM UTC-5, Irving S wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 4:44:10 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 3:31:18 PM UTC-5, Irving S wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 1:11:38 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:22 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the passenger seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wet conditions, but got a lot better later on
    until we finished up on a completely dry track. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid
    with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's throttle pedal is not very progressive), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone needed some demonstration of just how >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with
    about 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in
    two of the cars (I think she went out in the
    Mustang after her first go with me in the Camaro) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more laps to really see what the car could do. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warming up the car and also recording some video >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for tutorial video for the company to offer for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those coming to the next event to actually see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the >>>>>>>>>>>>> old “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious >>>>>>>>>>>>> for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & >>>>>>>>>>>>> the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old >>>>>>>>>>>>> pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the edge >>>>>>>>>>>> of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer >>>>>>>>>>>>> rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... >>>>>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away
    from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet >>>>>>>> of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You
    obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what >>>>>>> is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    Hey Fool, you REALLY need to educate yourself about flying; what
    happens if you spin out? Now, look up what happens in the same
    situation to an aircraft.
    Because the two words don't mean nearly the same thing in the different >>>>> contexts...

    ...and furthermore, to drive a racing car fast, you have to risk
    spinning in pretty much every corner, whereas in an aircraft
    (particularly a sailplane or glider), you actively avoid the flight
    regime where entering a spin is even possible.

    To each there own, I could think of a more boring way to spend time and >>>> waste money. Going around a race track fast, Wow!

    It’s always a YMMV. Some enjoy jumping out of airplanes, others
    golf, etc.

    Now Alan dear I am not talking about you personally, but I will cite
    a study clearly showing an inverse relationship between penis size
    and the ownership of fast cars. The need to go fast seems to be a
    compensation for what some are lacking.

    When you finally get around to finding that cite, make sure it’s the same one
    that also addresses people who think buying fancier gear is the end-all to >>> fitness and muscle memory development for the arbitrary benefit of maybe >>> a better stroke or two here or there.

    I went to a race once. Majority of spectators were ignorant rednecks, average
    IQ will below 70. Got no time to be around such trash, but again old man, to
    each their own.

    Yup, that’s NASCAR style events. Try a version that’s not based on prohibition.

    The happiness you gave these people, taking them on the journey around >>>> the track, so touching. Brought tears to my eyes. The cancer survivor, wow >>>> the happiness she must have experienced. I will never know, I got better >>>> things to do than go fast and go round and round. But to each their own, >>>> yes indeed!

    It’s a document-drama, but do consider the clip in “Ford vs Ferrari” where
    Carol Shelby gives Henry Ford Jr a hot lap to explain what he got for his $9M.

    -hh

    LOL!

    The Jersey clown to the rescue. Good job. Predictable as predictable gets.

    So…does this mean you *still* can’t find that alleged cite?

    Why are you not in your closet hiding? Won't be long before that homely prick
    you call a governor will have you all quaranteed because of the monkey virus!

    Oh, you finally figured out that I’m not hiding? What was it that tipped you off?
    BTW, good day out today, plus grilled a nice tenderloin this evening. Would have
    been nice to have been al fresco for the rest of the dinner with a decent French
    blush, but the Sahara dusts held down the sunset view. But there’s tomorrow...

    Hey!

    My sister-in-law, niece and I had reverse-seared striploins and caesar
    salad!

    No Sahara dust, but I'm fairly certain that global warming will be
    providing its annual forest fire spectacular here in BC.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon May 23 17:02:10 2022
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 9:04:36 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-22 6:03 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 3:49:28 PM UTC-5, Irving S wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 4:44:10 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 3:31:18 PM UTC-5, Irving S wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 1:11:38 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:22 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to people with no previous track experience. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the passenger seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wet conditions, but got a lot better later on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until we finished up on a completely dry track. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's throttle pedal is not very progressive), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone needed some demonstration of just how >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two of the cars (I think she went out in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mustang after her first go with me in the Camaro) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more laps to really see what the car could do. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warming up the car and also recording some video >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for tutorial video for the company to offer for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those coming to the next event to actually see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what they're supposed to be seeing when they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that you can have fun invoking lift throttle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the >>>>>>>>>>>>> old “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious >>>>>>>>>>>>> for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & >>>>>>>>>>>>> the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old >>>>>>>>>>>>> pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the edge >>>>>>>>>>>> of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer >>>>>>>>>>>>> rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards… >>>>>>>>>>>> Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... >>>>>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away >>>>>>>>>> from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet >>>>>>>> of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You
    obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what >>>>>>> is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years. >>>>>>
    Hey Fool, you REALLY need to educate yourself about flying; what >>>>>> happens if you spin out? Now, look up what happens in the same
    situation to an aircraft.
    Because the two words don't mean nearly the same thing in the different
    contexts...

    ...and furthermore, to drive a racing car fast, you have to risk
    spinning in pretty much every corner, whereas in an aircraft
    (particularly a sailplane or glider), you actively avoid the flight >>>>> regime where entering a spin is even possible.

    To each there own, I could think of a more boring way to spend time and >>>> waste money. Going around a race track fast, Wow!

    It’s always a YMMV. Some enjoy jumping out of airplanes, others
    golf, etc.

    Now Alan dear I am not talking about you personally, but I will cite >>>> a study clearly showing an inverse relationship between penis size
    and the ownership of fast cars. The need to go fast seems to be a
    compensation for what some are lacking.

    When you finally get around to finding that cite, make sure it’s the same one
    that also addresses people who think buying fancier gear is the end-all to
    fitness and muscle memory development for the arbitrary benefit of maybe >>> a better stroke or two here or there.

    I went to a race once. Majority of spectators were ignorant rednecks, average
    IQ will below 70. Got no time to be around such trash, but again old man, to
    each their own.

    Yup, that’s NASCAR style events. Try a version that’s not based on prohibition.

    The happiness you gave these people, taking them on the journey around >>>> the track, so touching. Brought tears to my eyes. The cancer survivor, wow
    the happiness she must have experienced. I will never know, I got better
    things to do than go fast and go round and round. But to each their own,
    yes indeed!

    It’s a document-drama, but do consider the clip in “Ford vs Ferrari” where
    Carol Shelby gives Henry Ford Jr a hot lap to explain what he got for his $9M.

    -hh

    LOL!

    The Jersey clown to the rescue. Good job. Predictable as predictable gets.

    So…does this mean you *still* can’t find that alleged cite?

    Why are you not in your closet hiding? Won't be long before that homely prick
    you call a governor will have you all quaranteed because of the monkey virus!

    Oh, you finally figured out that I’m not hiding? What was it that tipped you off?
    BTW, good day out today, plus grilled a nice tenderloin this evening. Would have
    been nice to have been al fresco for the rest of the dinner with a decent French
    blush, but the Sahara dusts held down the sunset view. But there’s tomorrow...
    Hey!

    My sister-in-law, niece and I had reverse-seared striploins and caesar salad!

    No Sahara dust, but I'm fairly certain that global warming will be
    providing its annual forest fire spectacular here in BC.

    Used up the last of the charcoal for that, so bought some more today.
    Meeting friends tomorrow night out, so probably Wednesday for steaks
    on the grill.

    Hosted a zoom earlier today w/a few friends .. and discovered that
    this time, we happened to all be in different time zones.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon May 23 19:47:30 2022
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next
    time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and
    I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically
    leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet
    from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're
    doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and the
    hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of feet by a
    sudden wind gust?

    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a wind
    gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.

    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.

    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a wall at
    high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying in a
    regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if they want
    to win).

    :-)

    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.

    So?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon May 23 19:35:35 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually >>>> racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles. >>>>>
    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you >> tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in comparison
    to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and I'm
    usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically leave
    3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet from
    the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're doing it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon May 23 19:39:23 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually >>>> racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles. >>>>>
    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you >> tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in comparison
    to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and I'm
    usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically leave
    3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet from
    the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and the hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of feet by a sudden wind gust? I don't think so. You also never answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out. The NTSB
    provides photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue May 24 09:04:05 2022
    On 2022-05-24 8:52 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 12:20:00 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to >>>>>>>>>>> people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop. >>>>>>>>>>>
    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually >>>>>>> racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles. >>>>>>>>
    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you >>>>> tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of the
    ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    He landed a 150 with an instructor's help on a really nice day. According to Alan that makes him a pilot.

    Nope.

    I've never claimed that.

    And it's irrelevant here anyway.

    The simple fact of the matter is that when you're racing, you
    deliberately operate as close to the limit of adhesion as you can with
    walls sometimes only a few feet away; sometimes only a few inches.

    When you're flying, except for occasional training exercises, you
    actively avoid operating at the ragged edge of aerodynamic performance
    (in fact, doesn't flight training now emphasize spin avoidance over spin recovery).

    Metaphorically, "coffin corner" is where a racing driver lives.


    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 24 08:50:45 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 2:48:36 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 10:34 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 11:01:55 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of
    the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    That would be correct in an airplane. I have done the kind of demo
    racing you discussed on a short oval in a NASCAR Modified class race
    car.
    Try it on a road course.
    It was a birthday present from the wife. Lot's of fun, and I did
    not spin out.
    Because you weren't actually close to the limit.
    Top speed was about 110-120.
    As I said.
    So's driving for miles and
    miles at 120 or more in Germany!
    Driving for miles and miles on a highway is not very much fun at any speed...

    ...but being allowed to do it at a higher speed does get it done with sooner.

    Have you every driven on an unrestricted autobahn? Likely not. 120 is slow in the fast lane. You have cars going 150 or more that come up behind you with headlights flashing telling you to move over and NOW! Gets you attention.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue May 24 08:59:09 2022
    On 2022-05-24 8:50 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 2:48:36 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 10:34 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 11:01:55 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4,
    Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race
    experiences" to people with no previous track
    experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang
    (manual gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set
    up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine
    kill switch for the passenger seat, full racing
    seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22
    people huge thrills and some insight into what
    it's like to drive a car at speed. The day
    started under wet conditions, but got a lot
    better later on until we finished up on a
    completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid
    with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in
    the worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's throttle pedal is not very
    progressive), and there were only a couple who
    I need to prevent from spinning with the aux
    brake. Almost everyone needed some
    demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with
    about 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in
    two of the cars (I think she went out in the
    Mustang after her first go with me in the
    Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with
    me for two more laps to really see what the car
    could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my
    own, warming up the car and also recording some
    video for tutorial video for the company to
    offer for those coming to the next event to
    actually see what they're supposed to be seeing
    when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe
    next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old
    one so that you can have fun invoking lift
    throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay
    out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when
    the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the
    old “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious
    for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old
    pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the
    edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer rotation and power-push the nose back to
    where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going
    backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring
    well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet
    of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    That would be correct in an airplane. I have done the kind of
    demo racing you discussed on a short oval in a NASCAR Modified
    class race car.
    Try it on a road course.
    It was a birthday present from the wife. Lot's of fun, and I did
    not spin out.
    Because you weren't actually close to the limit.
    Top speed was about 110-120.
    As I said.
    So's driving for miles and miles at 120 or more in Germany!
    Driving for miles and miles on a highway is not very much fun at
    any speed...

    ...but being allowed to do it at a higher speed does get it done
    with sooner.

    Have you every driven on an unrestricted autobahn? Likely not. 120 is
    slow in the fast lane. You have cars going 150 or more that come up
    behind you with headlights flashing telling you to move over and NOW!
    Gets you attention.


    Yeah... ...you would be impressed by that, I'm sure.

    <yawn>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to TomS on Tue May 24 08:52:20 2022
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 12:20:00 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to
    people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually
    racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles. >>>>>
    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you >> tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    He landed a 150 with an instructor's help on a really nice day. According to Alan that makes him a pilot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 24 10:11:14 2022
    On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 12:04:21 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-24 8:52 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 12:20:00 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 8:01:55 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I spent yesterday doing my second event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to
    people with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual gearbox), and a Nissan
    370Z, each set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch
    for the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive a car at speed. The day started
    under wet conditions, but got a lot better later on until we finished up
    on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with instruction. >>>>>>>>>>>
    A few were less timid, but only one really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there were only a couple
    who I need to prevent from spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone
    needed some demonstration of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about 10 laps as driver.
    One very nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her first go with
    me in the Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for tutorial video for the company to offer
    for those coming to the next event to actually see what they're supposed
    to be seeing when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old “engine way in back”
    early 911’s were notorious for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, but usually
    racing cars are closer to the edge of that than most road vehicles. >>>>>>>>
    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... ...but you
    tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of the >>> ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)
    LOL! You drive on FLAT GROUND, and think that is COOL!! You obviously aren't a pilot and have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what is involved!!! But, hey, that is your modus operandi for years.

    He landed a 150 with an instructor's help on a really nice day. According to Alan that makes him a pilot.
    Nope.

    I've never claimed that.

    And it's irrelevant here anyway.

    The simple fact of the matter is that when you're racing, you
    deliberately operate as close to the limit of adhesion as you can with
    walls sometimes only a few feet away; sometimes only a few inches.

    When you're flying, except for occasional training exercises, you
    actively avoid operating at the ragged edge of aerodynamic performance
    (in fact, doesn't flight training now emphasize spin avoidance over spin recovery).

    Metaphorically, "coffin corner" is where a racing driver lives.


    :-)

    wow old man, that "coffin corner" analogy is really profound. wow, all i can say is wow.

    Let me again cite a study where penis size and the need for fast cars is inversely related. So guys to make up for what they lack as men as willing to risk their lives? Hilarious!

    Again old man, not saying anything about your pecker. Have no idea what you lack or do not lack. But this racing thing and the need to go fast, and the need to tell others how fast you go? HILARIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Tue May 24 14:53:18 2022
    On 2022-05-24 2:39 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 10:50:47 AM UTC-5, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 2:48:36 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 10:34 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 11:01:55 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of
    the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    That would be correct in an airplane. I have done the kind of demo
    racing you discussed on a short oval in a NASCAR Modified class race
    car.
    Try it on a road course.
    It was a birthday present from the wife. Lot's of fun, and I did
    not spin out.
    Because you weren't actually close to the limit.
    Top speed was about 110-120.
    As I said.
    So's driving for miles and
    miles at 120 or more in Germany!
    Driving for miles and miles on a highway is not very much fun at any
    speed...

    ...but being allowed to do it at a higher speed does get it done with
    sooner.

    Have you every driven on an unrestricted autobahn? Likely not. 120 is
    slow in the fast lane. You have cars going 150 or more that come up
    behind you with headlights flashing telling you to move over and NOW!
    Gets you attention.

    Even so, it still isn’t pushing the limits like competitive track racing does,
    until you talking about being on the ‘Bahn (or Autostrada) doing 100mph+
    in the rain, at night.

    Honestly, I would jump in any properly maintained car built for those
    speeds and just drive it as fast as it would go.

    As you say: in good conditions, it's just not much of a challenge; not
    compared racing at far lower speeds, but cornering at maximum g within
    feet of the wall.

    Between the apex of turns 8 and 9 is the time you need to apply full
    throttle if you're going to go up the main straight to turn 1 fast
    enough to be competitive. You're already doing 60+ mph and you're only a
    little more than half a football field away (63 yards or so) from a
    concrete wall dead ahead of you.

    Overcook it, and that wall arrives in a hurry.

    I'm guessing neither Tom pulls maximum g in their aircraft when they're
    within 500 feet of anything. Hell, I doubt that either of them even
    pulls maximum g manoeuvres on any regular basis.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 24 15:02:01 2022
    On 2022-05-24 2:53 p.m., Alan wrote:
    Driving for miles and miles on a highway is not very much fun at any
    speed...

    ...but being allowed to do it at a higher speed does get it done with
    sooner.

    Have you every driven on an unrestricted autobahn? Likely not. 120 is
    slow in the fast lane. You have cars going 150 or more that come up
    behind you with headlights flashing telling you to move over and NOW!
    Gets you attention.

    Even so, it still isn’t pushing the limits like competitive track
    racing does,
    until you talking about being on the ‘Bahn (or Autostrada) doing 100mph+ >> in the rain, at night.

    Honestly, I would jump in any properly maintained car built for those
    speeds and just drive it as fast as it would go.

    As you say: in good conditions, it's just not much of a challenge; not compared racing at far lower speeds, but cornering at maximum g within
    feet of the wall.

    Between the apex of turns 8 and 9 is the time you need to apply full
    throttle if you're going to go up the main straight to turn 1 fast
    enough to be competitive. You're already doing 60+ mph and you're only a little more than half a football field away (63 yards or so) from a
    concrete wall dead ahead of you.

    Overcook it, and that wall arrives in a hurry.

    I'm guessing neither Tom pulls maximum g in their aircraft when they're within 500 feet of anything. Hell, I doubt that either of them even
    pulls maximum g manoeuvres on any regular basis.

    Here's where I'm talking about:

    https://goo.gl/maps/45zeLEj38uqnTxPT7

    You can see the rectangular asphalt patch between the two lots of apex
    kerbing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to thomas...@gmail.com on Tue May 24 14:39:07 2022
    On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 10:50:47 AM UTC-5, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 2:48:36 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 10:34 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 11:01:55 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of
    the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    That would be correct in an airplane. I have done the kind of demo racing you discussed on a short oval in a NASCAR Modified class race car.
    Try it on a road course.
    It was a birthday present from the wife. Lot's of fun, and I did
    not spin out.
    Because you weren't actually close to the limit.
    Top speed was about 110-120.
    As I said.
    So's driving for miles and
    miles at 120 or more in Germany!
    Driving for miles and miles on a highway is not very much fun at any speed...

    ...but being allowed to do it at a higher speed does get it done with sooner.

    Have you every driven on an unrestricted autobahn? Likely not. 120 is
    slow in the fast lane. You have cars going 150 or more that come up
    behind you with headlights flashing telling you to move over and NOW!
    Gets you attention.

    Even so, it still isn’t pushing the limits like competitive track racing does,
    until you talking about being on the ‘Bahn (or Autostrada) doing 100mph+
    in the rain, at night.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed May 25 19:52:56 2022
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and
    I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically
    leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet
    from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're
    doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and the
    hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of feet by a sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a wind
    gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a wall at high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying in a regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if they want
    to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed May 25 19:51:57 2022
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and
    I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically
    leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet
    from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're
    doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and the
    hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of feet by a
    sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a wind
    gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a wall at
    high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying in a
    regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if they want
    to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.
    So?

    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed May 25 19:54:38 2022
    On 2022-05-25 7:51 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and
    I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically
    leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet
    from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're
    doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and the
    hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of feet by a
    sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a wind
    gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a wall at
    high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying in a
    regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if they want
    to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.
    So?

    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Wow, sunshine! What a detailed rebuttal!

    LOL

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed May 25 19:55:49 2022
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and
    I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically
    leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet
    from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're
    doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and the
    hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of feet by a
    sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a wind
    gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a wall at
    high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying in a
    regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if they want
    to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?

    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead to a
    spin in the first place!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu May 26 10:15:07 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 2:48:36 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 10:34 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 11:01:55 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering
    short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual
    gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet
    conditions, but got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about
    10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor
    of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride
    as a passenger with me for two more laps to really
    see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so
    that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old
    “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles,
    but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than
    most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want
    it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from
    the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet of
    the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    That would be correct in an airplane. I have done the kind of demo
    racing you discussed on a short oval in a NASCAR Modified class race
    car.
    Try it on a road course.
    It was a birthday present from the wife. Lot's of fun, and I did
    not spin out.
    Because you weren't actually close to the limit.
    Top speed was about 110-120.
    As I said.
    So's driving for miles and
    miles at 120 or more in Germany!
    Driving for miles and miles on a highway is not very much fun at any speed...

    ...but being allowed to do it at a higher speed does get it done with sooner.

    I've done road courses in racing carts. Not recently, but spun out a few times into the tire barriers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu May 26 10:23:30 2022
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering >>>>>>>>>>>>> short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people >>>>>>>>>>>>> with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses >>>>>>>>>>>>> with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet >>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions, but got a lot better later on until we >>>>>>>>>>>>> finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with >>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there >>>>>>>>>>>>> were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed >>>>>>>>>>>>> some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor >>>>>>>>>>>>> of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her >>>>>>>>>>>>> first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride >>>>>>>>>>>>> as a passenger with me for two more laps to really >>>>>>>>>>>>> see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what >>>>>>>>>>>>> they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so >>>>>>>>>>>> that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old >>>>>>>>>> “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and
    I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet
    from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and the
    hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of feet by a
    sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a wind
    gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying in a
    regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead to a
    spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the recovery. If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like this guy, too steep, to slow:

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

    Or this one just a few days ago:

    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/

    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a lot better than an aircraft spin into the ground.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Thu May 26 11:03:38 2022
    On 2022-05-26 10:15 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 2:48:36 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 10:34 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 11:01:55 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 4:54 a.m., -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 12:39:31 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4,
    Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap) "race
    experiences" to people with no previous track
    experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang
    (manual gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set
    up with an auxiliary brake pedal and engine
    kill switch for the passenger seat, full racing
    seats and harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22
    people huge thrills and some insight into what
    it's like to drive a car at speed. The day
    started under wet conditions, but got a lot
    better later on until we finished up on a
    completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid
    with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in
    the worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's throttle pedal is not very
    progressive), and there were only a couple who
    I need to prevent from spinning with the aux
    brake. Almost everyone needed some
    demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with
    about 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for rides in
    two of the cars (I think she went out in the
    Mustang after her first go with me in the
    Camaro) asked if she ride as a passenger with
    me for two more laps to really see what the car
    could do. I think I gave her a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my
    own, warming up the car and also recording some
    video for tutorial video for the company to
    offer for those coming to the next event to
    actually see what they're supposed to be seeing
    when they actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe
    next time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old
    one so that you can have fun invoking lift
    throttle oversteer to hang the back end waaaay
    out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when
    the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the
    old “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious
    for. Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re slowing…big old
    pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to the
    edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer rotation and power-push the nose back to
    where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end up going
    backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring
    well away from the ground).

    Plus tracks aren’t flat, so there are slope & momentum
    considerations too.
    To be completely fair, my track is very flat.

    But I doubt Tom does much extreme manoeuvring within a few feet
    of the ground at up to 110mph.

    :-)

    That would be correct in an airplane. I have done the kind of
    demo racing you discussed on a short oval in a NASCAR Modified
    class race car.
    Try it on a road course.
    It was a birthday present from the wife. Lot's of fun, and I did
    not spin out.
    Because you weren't actually close to the limit.
    Top speed was about 110-120.
    As I said.
    So's driving for miles and miles at 120 or more in Germany!
    Driving for miles and miles on a highway is not very much fun at
    any speed...

    ...but being allowed to do it at a higher speed does get it done
    with sooner.

    I've done road courses in racing carts. Not recently, but spun out a
    few times into the tire barriers.


    You've done public karting in governed karts which maybe go 30mph.

    I've raced at as fast as 130mph (at the end of the main straight at
    Pacific Raceways). At Mission, top speed is about 110mph and while there
    are tire barriers in some places, there is far more concrete wall.

    And the way to race well is to push the vehicles limits as much as you
    can at all times.

    Don't even try to pretend you're ever deliberately pushing the Cessna
    near its limits.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Thu May 26 11:04:41 2022
    On 2022-05-26 10:23 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event
    as a professional driving coach with a
    company offering short (mostly 3 lap)
    "race experiences" to people with no
    previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang
    (manual gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each
    set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and
    engine kill switch for the passenger
    seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22
    people huge thrills and some insight into
    what it's like to drive a car at speed.
    The day started under wet conditions, but
    got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less
    timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one
    really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for
    driving in the wet; the Camaro's throttle
    pedal is not very progressive), and
    there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake.
    Almost everyone needed some demonstration
    of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers
    with about 10 laps as driver. One very
    nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had
    paid for rides in two of the cars (I
    think she went out in the Mustang after
    her first go with me in the Camaro) asked
    if she ride as a passenger with me for
    two more laps to really see what the car
    could do. I think I gave her a sense for
    it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on
    my own, warming up the car and also
    recording some video for tutorial video
    for the company to offer for those coming
    to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a
    Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911
    …preferably an old one so that you can have
    fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to
    hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting
    power-on oversteer out of the Camaro...
    ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer,
    that the old “engine way in back” early 911’s
    were notorious for. Classical instance was too
    late corner deceleration getting off the
    throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to
    the edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer rotation and power-push the nose back
    to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end
    up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you
    fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can
    hit in comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing
    60mph, and I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I
    typically leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s
    of feet from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift
    when you're doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying
    and the hazards involved. Are you subject to falling
    hundreds of feet by a sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from
    a wind gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a
    wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the question:
    what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting
    a wall at high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid
    flying in a regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if
    they want to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of such
    accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to
    you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead
    to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery. If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like
    this guy, too steep, to slow:

    How often? At what altitude?


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

    Or this one just a few days ago:

    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/

    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a
    lot better than an aircraft spin into the ground.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Thu May 26 11:45:47 2022
    On 2022-05-26 11:27 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions, but got a lot better later on until we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some demonstration of just how hard a car will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a passenger with me for two more laps to really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see what the car could do. I think I gave her a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warming up the car and also recording some video >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for tutorial video for the company to offer for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those coming to the next event to actually see what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're supposed to be seeing when they actually >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old >>>>>>>>>>>>> “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end >>>>>>>>>>>>> comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the edge
    of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer >>>>>>>>>>>>> rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring
    well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of
    feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to
    you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead
    to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.

    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was taught as a
    novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.

    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like
    this guy, too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/

    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a lot
    better than an aircraft spin into the ground.

    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end in the
    former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking about would
    be directly comparing the two.


    The Liarboy has to:

    1. Immediately jump in to disagree with me.

    2. Denigrate my racing and perforce, racing itself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Thu May 26 18:27:10 2022
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering >>>>>>>>>>>>> short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people >>>>>>>>>>>>> with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for >>>>>>>>>>>>> the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses >>>>>>>>>>>>> with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet >>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions, but got a lot better later on until we >>>>>>>>>>>>> finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with >>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there >>>>>>>>>>>>> were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed >>>>>>>>>>>>> some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor >>>>>>>>>>>>> of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her >>>>>>>>>>>>> first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride >>>>>>>>>>>>> as a passenger with me for two more laps to really >>>>>>>>>>>>> see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, >>>>>>>>>>>>> warming up the car and also recording some video >>>>>>>>>>>>> for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what >>>>>>>>>>>>> they're supposed to be seeing when they actually >>>>>>>>>>>>> get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so >>>>>>>>>>>> that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old >>>>>>>>>> “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the edge
    of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring
    well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of
    feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to
    you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead
    to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.

    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was taught as a
    novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.

    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like
    this guy, too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/

    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a lot
    better than an aircraft spin into the ground.

    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end in the
    former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking about would
    be directly comparing the two.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Amos P (transgender nymshifter)
    Jerry C. (same attention seeking nymshifter)
    Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
    Felicity (transgender nymshifter)
    George R (transgender nymshifter)
    Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu May 26 15:03:23 2022
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 2:45:49 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 11:27 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> professional driving coach with a company offering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions, but got a lot better later on until we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were only a couple who I need to prevent from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some demonstration of just how hard a car will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a passenger with me for two more laps to really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see what the car could do. I think I gave her a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warming up the car and also recording some video >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for tutorial video for the company to offer for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those coming to the next event to actually see what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're supposed to be seeing when they actually >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old >>>>>>>>>>>>> “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner deceleration >>>>>>>>>>>>> getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end >>>>>>>>>>>>> comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the edge
    of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer >>>>>>>>>>>>> rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards… >>>>>>>>>>>> Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring
    well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking >>>>>>>>> retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in >>>>>>>> comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of
    feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall. >>>>>>
    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to
    you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead
    to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.

    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was taught as a novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.

    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like
    this guy, too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/

    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a lot
    better than an aircraft spin into the ground.

    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end in the former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking about would
    be directly comparing the two.

    The Liarboy has to:

    1. Immediately jump in to disagree with me.

    2. Denigrate my racing and perforce, racing itself.

    BOO HOO HOO. BOO HOO HOO!

    The poor little troll got his feelings hurt.

    Hilarious, you never fail to entertain old man. Thank you a hundred times. I can only imagine the personal sacrifices you have made with your hundreds of thousands of posts. Just know I appreciate it. You entertain more than you can ever imagine.
    You might not have finished college , you might not have a wife or kids, but no one can post like you. Wow, impressive...VERY IMPRESSIVE

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu May 26 19:00:45 2022
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:55:52 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering >>>>>>>>>>>>> short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people >>>>>>>>>>>>> with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for
    the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses >>>>>>>>>>>>> with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people
    huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet >>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions, but got a lot better later on until we >>>>>>>>>>>>> finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with >>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there >>>>>>>>>>>>> were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed >>>>>>>>>>>>> some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor >>>>>>>>>>>>> of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the
    cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her >>>>>>>>>>>>> first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride >>>>>>>>>>>>> as a passenger with me for two more laps to really >>>>>>>>>>>>> see what the car could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own,
    warming up the car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the company to offer for
    those coming to the next event to actually see what >>>>>>>>>>>>> they're supposed to be seeing when they actually
    get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so >>>>>>>>>>>> that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old >>>>>>>>>> “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end
    comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer
    rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing...
    ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and
    I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet
    from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and the
    hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of feet by a
    sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a wind
    gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying in a
    regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead to a
    spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a flight regime that borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above the edge of stall in a steep banked (45 degrees) turn.

    How many of your friends and acquaintances have been killed while racing cars?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu May 26 19:25:51 2022
    On 2022-05-26 7:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:55:52 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event
    as a professional driving coach with a
    company offering short (mostly 3 lap)
    "race experiences" to people with no
    previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang
    (manual gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each
    set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and
    engine kill switch for the passenger
    seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22
    people huge thrills and some insight into
    what it's like to drive a car at speed.
    The day started under wet conditions, but
    got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less
    timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one
    really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for
    driving in the wet; the Camaro's throttle
    pedal is not very progressive), and
    there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake.
    Almost everyone needed some demonstration
    of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers
    with about 10 laps as driver. One very
    nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had
    paid for rides in two of the cars (I
    think she went out in the Mustang after
    her first go with me in the Camaro) asked
    if she ride as a passenger with me for
    two more laps to really see what the car
    could do. I think I gave her a sense for
    it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on
    my own, warming up the car and also
    recording some video for tutorial video
    for the company to offer for those coming
    to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a
    Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911
    …preferably an old one so that you can have
    fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to
    hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting
    power-on oversteer out of the Camaro...
    ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer,
    that the old “engine way in back” early 911’s
    were notorious for. Classical instance was too
    late corner deceleration getting off the
    throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to
    the edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer rotation and power-push the nose back
    to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end
    up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you
    fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can
    hit in comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing
    60mph, and I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I
    typically leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s
    of feet from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift
    when you're doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying
    and the hazards involved. Are you subject to falling
    hundreds of feet by a sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from
    a wind gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a
    wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the question:
    what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting
    a wall at high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid
    flying in a regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if
    they want to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of such
    accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to
    you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead
    to a spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a
    flight regime that borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above
    the edge of stall in a steep banked (45 degrees) turn.

    Bullshit.

    Show me one reference that says you do that and why.


    How many of your friends and acquaintances have been killed while
    racing cars?

    Happily, none.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu May 26 19:30:05 2022
    On 2022-05-26 7:00 p.m., TomS wrote:

    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead to a
    spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a flight regime that borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above the edge of stall in a steep banked (45 degrees) turn.
    This took me 5 minutes to find:

    'However, physics is beautiful. As it turns out, the minimum sink speed
    at bank angles greater than 0 degrees also increase at exactly the same
    rate as stall speed, which is the square root of 1 divided by the cosine
    of the angle of bank (1/cos(ang))0.5) – the square root of the load
    factor. This is very convenient because if a glider is flown in a
    thermal at the optimum minimum sink speed for the angle of bank chosen,
    the airspeed margin above accelerated stall speed is IDENTICAL to the
    margin in level flight.'

    So no, you're not flying in a flight regime that "borders on a classic
    spin entry"...

    ...unless you're an idiot...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu May 26 19:25:21 2022
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 9:00:52 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:55:52 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering >>>>>>>>>>>>> short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people >>>>>>>>>>>>> with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for >>>>>>>>>>>>> the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses >>>>>>>>>>>>> with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people >>>>>>>>>>>>> huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet >>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions, but got a lot better later on until we >>>>>>>>>>>>> finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with >>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there >>>>>>>>>>>>> were only a couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed >>>>>>>>>>>>> some demonstration of just how hard a car will
    really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor >>>>>>>>>>>>> of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her >>>>>>>>>>>>> first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride >>>>>>>>>>>>> as a passenger with me for two more laps to really >>>>>>>>>>>>> see what the car could do. I think I gave her a >>>>>>>>>>>>> sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, >>>>>>>>>>>>> warming up the car and also recording some video >>>>>>>>>>>>> for tutorial video for the company to offer for >>>>>>>>>>>>> those coming to the next event to actually see what >>>>>>>>>>>>> they're supposed to be seeing when they actually >>>>>>>>>>>>> get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in
    May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so >>>>>>>>>>>> that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on
    oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old >>>>>>>>>> “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end >>>>>>>>>> comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer >>>>>>>>>> rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking
    retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in
    comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph, and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and the
    hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a wall at
    high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead to a spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a flight regime
    that borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above the edge of stall in a
    steep banked (45 degrees) turn.

    How far “just above”? 2mph? 50mph?
    And with how much recovery margin? A foot? 5,000 feet?

    How many of your friends and acquaintances have been killed while racing cars?

    Offhand…
    Phil, from Orca Industries. Lost it on a corner, hit the outer guardrail; died from injuries.

    Similarly, while scuba diving:
    Bill & Adrian…FL Cave; OC / OOA drowned; cause never clearly resolved;
    Ron in San Diego (ran my domain)…SCRB malfunction; hypoxia suspected.

    Meantime, both of my friends who are bush pilots in Africa haven’t even had
    a crash in the 16 years since we first met. Likewise, two sailplane fliers I know,
    although one is having pilot license issues from Brexit…does that count?

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu May 26 20:13:51 2022
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 7:30:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 7:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up. >>>>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead to a
    spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a flight regime that borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above the edge of stall in a steep banked (45 degrees) turn.
    This took me 5 minutes to find:

    'However, physics is beautiful. As it turns out, the minimum sink speed
    at bank angles greater than 0 degrees also increase at exactly the same
    rate as stall speed, which is the square root of 1 divided by the cosine
    of the angle of bank (1/cos(ang))0.5) – the square root of the load factor. This is very convenient because if a glider is flown in a
    thermal at the optimum minimum sink speed for the angle of bank chosen,
    the airspeed margin above accelerated stall speed is IDENTICAL to the
    margin in level flight.'

    So no, you're not flying in a flight regime that "borders on a classic
    spin entry"...

    ...unless you're an idiot...

    LOL! You obviously haven't flown a damn thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu May 26 20:21:02 2022
    On 2022-05-26 8:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 7:30:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 7:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up. >>>>>>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead to a >>>> spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a flight regime that borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above the edge of stall in a steep banked (45 degrees) turn.
    This took me 5 minutes to find:

    'However, physics is beautiful. As it turns out, the minimum sink speed
    at bank angles greater than 0 degrees also increase at exactly the same
    rate as stall speed, which is the square root of 1 divided by the cosine
    of the angle of bank (1/cos(ang))0.5) – the square root of the load
    factor. This is very convenient because if a glider is flown in a
    thermal at the optimum minimum sink speed for the angle of bank chosen,
    the airspeed margin above accelerated stall speed is IDENTICAL to the
    margin in level flight.'

    So no, you're not flying in a flight regime that "borders on a classic
    spin entry"...

    ...unless you're an idiot...

    LOL! You obviously haven't flown a damn thing.

    Me? Almost none at all...

    ...but I was an avid follower of aviation.

    And the guy I just quoted? Lemme see:

    'About the author: Steve is a commercial pilot in single engine
    airplanes, single engine seaplanes, and gliders. He holds an instrument
    rating and is a Certified Flight Instructor for airplanes, instruments,
    and gliders. He has logged over 4,000 flight hr including over 2,000 hr
    as a flight instructor. He is a retired IBM Engineering Manager and is a
    member of the Flight Instructor staff at Sugarbush Soaring,
    Warren-Sugarbush Airport, Warren, VT.'

    <http://www.omagdigital.com/publication/?i=402355&article_id=2767735&view=articleBrowser&ver=html5>

    Oops.

    So... ...you fly regularly, so let's see you answer a couple of
    questions about your sailplane.

    What is the stall speed (we'll assume without any ballast)?

    What is the minimum sink speed (same assumption)?

    Hey, Sunshine?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Fri May 27 07:56:25 2022
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 2:27:12 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a
    professional driving coach with a company offering >>>>>>>>>>>>> short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences" to people >>>>>>>>>>>>> with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for >>>>>>>>>>>>> the passenger seat, full racing seats and harnesses >>>>>>>>>>>>> with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people >>>>>>>>>>>>> huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under wet >>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions, but got a lot better later on until we >>>>>>>>>>>>> finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid with >>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> worst car for driving in the wet; the Camaro's >>>>>>>>>>>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive), and there >>>>>>>>>>>>> were only a couple who I need to prevent from >>>>>>>>>>>>> spinning with the aux brake. Almost everyone needed >>>>>>>>>>>>> some demonstration of just how hard a car will >>>>>>>>>>>>> really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with about >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a survivor >>>>>>>>>>>>> of cancer, who had paid for rides in two of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> cars (I think she went out in the Mustang after her >>>>>>>>>>>>> first go with me in the Camaro) asked if she ride >>>>>>>>>>>>> as a passenger with me for two more laps to really >>>>>>>>>>>>> see what the car could do. I think I gave her a >>>>>>>>>>>>> sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, >>>>>>>>>>>>> warming up the car and also recording some video >>>>>>>>>>>>> for tutorial video for the company to offer for >>>>>>>>>>>>> those coming to the next event to actually see what >>>>>>>>>>>>> they're supposed to be seeing when they actually >>>>>>>>>>>>> get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in >>>>>>>>>>>>> May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe next >>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old one so >>>>>>>>>>>> that you can have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on >>>>>>>>>>> oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when the >>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the old >>>>>>>>>> “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner deceleration >>>>>>>>>> getting off the throttle in the corner & the back end >>>>>>>>>> comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the edge
    of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the oversteer >>>>>>>>>> rotation and power-push the nose back to where you want >>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy manoeuvring
    well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you fucking >>>>>> retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can hit in >>>>> comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing 60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds of
    feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to
    you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead
    to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.
    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was taught as a novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.
    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like
    this guy, too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/

    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a lot better than an aircraft spin into the ground.
    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end in the
    former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking about would
    be directly comparing the two.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Amos P (transgender nymshifter)
    Jerry C. (same attention seeking nymshifter)
    Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
    Felicity (transgender nymshifter)
    George R (transgender nymshifter)
    Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
    Enjoy!

    Alan, you just demonstrated your ignorance again! Both accidents were caused by pilots flying so slow that the aircraft stalled and spun. There was insufficient altitude for recovery. The aircraft went in more or less vertically at high speed, killing
    the pilots. in both case a few knots more airspeed and no spins would have happened. This can be insidious. I know, I have had an unintentional aircraft spin. I'm sure you have had the same in a race car.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri May 27 08:10:24 2022
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 11:21:06 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 8:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 7:30:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 7:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up. >>>>>>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead to a >>>> spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a flight regime that borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above the edge of stall in a steep banked (45 degrees) turn.
    This took me 5 minutes to find:

    'However, physics is beautiful. As it turns out, the minimum sink speed >> at bank angles greater than 0 degrees also increase at exactly the same >> rate as stall speed, which is the square root of 1 divided by the cosine >> of the angle of bank (1/cos(ang))0.5) – the square root of the load
    factor. This is very convenient because if a glider is flown in a
    thermal at the optimum minimum sink speed for the angle of bank chosen, >> the airspeed margin above accelerated stall speed is IDENTICAL to the
    margin in level flight.'

    So no, you're not flying in a flight regime that "borders on a classic
    spin entry"...

    ...unless you're an idiot...

    LOL! You obviously haven't flown a damn thing.
    Me? Almost none at all...

    ...but I was an avid follower of aviation.

    And the guy I just quoted? Lemme see:

    'About the author: Steve is a commercial pilot in single engine
    airplanes, single engine seaplanes, and gliders. He holds an instrument rating and is a Certified Flight Instructor for airplanes, instruments,
    and gliders. He has logged over 4,000 flight hr including over 2,000 hr
    as a flight instructor. He is a retired IBM Engineering Manager and is a member of the Flight Instructor staff at Sugarbush Soaring,
    Warren-Sugarbush Airport, Warren, VT.'

    <http://www.omagdigital.com/publication/?i=402355&article_id=2767735&view=articleBrowser&ver=html5>

    Oops.

    So... ...you fly regularly, so let's see you answer a couple of
    questions about your sailplane.

    What is the stall speed (we'll assume without any ballast)?

    What is the minimum sink speed (same assumption)?

    Hey, Sunshine?

    Avid aviation follower? Really? How much time do you have in small aircraft? I'd ask some obscure technical questions but you can just go look up the answers.

    How many hours do you have logged as pilot in command? When did you pass the written test for a pilot's license? What are your aviation academic or experience qualifications?

    By the way, your first question above REALLY shows your ignorance. An aircraft can stall at ANY indicated airspeed if it has enough elevator authority and does not break up first.
    Minimum sink rate speed depends on bank angle. The steeper the bank the higher the minimum rate speed. There is no one answer to either question.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Fri May 27 10:52:19 2022
    On 2022-05-27 8:10 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 11:21:06 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 8:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 7:30:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 7:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of
    such accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what
    happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious
    injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that
    might lead to a spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight
    time) in a flight regime that borders on a classic spin
    entry: flying just above the edge of stall in a steep banked
    (45 degrees) turn.
    This took me 5 minutes to find:

    'However, physics is beautiful. As it turns out, the minimum
    sink speed at bank angles greater than 0 degrees also increase
    at exactly the same rate as stall speed, which is the square
    root of 1 divided by the cosine of the angle of bank
    (1/cos(ang))0.5) – the square root of the load factor. This is
    very convenient because if a glider is flown in a thermal at
    the optimum minimum sink speed for the angle of bank chosen,
    the airspeed margin above accelerated stall speed is IDENTICAL
    to the margin in level flight.'

    So no, you're not flying in a flight regime that "borders on a
    classic spin entry"...

    ...unless you're an idiot...

    LOL! You obviously haven't flown a damn thing.
    Me? Almost none at all...

    ...but I was an avid follower of aviation.

    And the guy I just quoted? Lemme see:

    'About the author: Steve is a commercial pilot in single engine
    airplanes, single engine seaplanes, and gliders. He holds an
    instrument rating and is a Certified Flight Instructor for
    airplanes, instruments, and gliders. He has logged over 4,000
    flight hr including over 2,000 hr as a flight instructor. He is a
    retired IBM Engineering Manager and is a member of the Flight
    Instructor staff at Sugarbush Soaring, Warren-Sugarbush Airport,
    Warren, VT.'

    <http://www.omagdigital.com/publication/?i=402355&article_id=2767735&view=articleBrowser&ver=html5>



    Oops.

    So... ...you fly regularly, so let's see you answer a couple of
    questions about your sailplane.

    What is the stall speed (we'll assume without any ballast)?

    What is the minimum sink speed (same assumption)?

    Hey, Sunshine?

    Avid aviation follower? Really? How much time do you have in small
    aircraft? I'd ask some obscure technical questions but you can just
    go look up the answers.

    So you can't be an avid follower of anything you cannot personally do?

    Is that what you're contending, Liarboy?

    I have very little time in small aircraft...

    ...but the man I just quoted is a certified flight instructor with 2,000
    hours AS an instructor and 4,000 hours overall.


    How many hours do you have logged as pilot in command? When did you
    pass the written test for a pilot's license? What are your aviation
    academic or experience qualifications?

    Why does any of that matter? Would it make Steve Platt's words any more
    true?


    By the way, your first question above REALLY shows your ignorance. An aircraft can stall at ANY indicated airspeed if it has enough
    elevator authority and does not break up first. Minimum sink rate
    speed depends on bank angle. The steeper the bank the higher the
    minimum rate speed. There is no one answer to either question.

    I'm fully aware that an aircraft CAN stall at any airspeed, Liarboy; the misnomer "accelerated stall", yes. And I knew

    However we're specifically discussing Sunshine's claim that he flies:

    "A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a flight regime that
    borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above the edge of stall in
    a steep banked (45 degrees) turn."

    That would be while he is circling in thermals in a SAILPLANE, you asshat..

    And when one is circling in a thermal, you fly at the airspeed for
    MINIMUM SINK RATE and that airspeed isn't all that close to stall speed.
    It remains proportionally higher than the UNaccelerated stall speed
    (which of course rises with increased bank angle).

    In level flight, the Schleicher ASH 31Mi 21m Sunsheim flies has an an unaccelerated stall airspeed of 67kph, and a minimum sink airspeed of
    about 87kph (the only reference I could find was the graphic in the
    brochure for it, so I don't have a precise number). So you have to fly
    nearly 23% slower than the correct airspeed for minimum sink in order to
    stall, and that ratio remains the same with increased angles of bank.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Fri May 27 11:02:18 2022
    On 2022-05-27 7:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 2:27:12 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second
    event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly
    3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern
    Mustang (manual gearbox), and a
    Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill
    switch for the passenger seat, full
    racing seats and harnesses with roll
    bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave
    22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive
    a car at speed. The day started under
    wet conditions, but got a lot better
    later on until we finished up on a
    completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became
    less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one
    really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for
    driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very
    progressive), and there were only a
    couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost
    everyone needed some demonstration of
    just how hard a car will really
    stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with
    customers with about 10 laps as
    driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for
    rides in two of the cars (I think she
    went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked
    if she ride as a passenger with me
    for two more laps to really see what
    the car could do. I think I gave her
    a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps
    on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for
    tutorial video for the company to
    offer for those coming to the next
    event to actually see what they're
    supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a
    Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office”
    <g> Maybe next time they’ll have a 911
    …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay
    out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting
    power-on oversteer out of the Camaro...
    ...especially when the track was still
    wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer,
    that the old “engine way in back” early
    911’s were notorious for. Classical
    instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re
    slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than
    most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the
    edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer rotation and power-push the nose
    back to where you want it to be. Otherwise,
    you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK,
    one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you
    fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you
    can hit in comparison to where you place a racing
    car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing
    60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so
    I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not
    1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift
    when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of
    flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds
    of feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble
    from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a
    wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the question:
    what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means
    hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid
    flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap
    (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of such
    accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens
    to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might
    lead to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.
    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was taught as
    a novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.
    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like this guy,
    too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE



    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/ >>>


    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a
    lot
    better than an aircraft spin into the ground.
    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end in
    the former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking about
    would be directly comparing the two.

    -- Bozo bin Amos P (transgender nymshifter) Jerry C. (same
    attention seeking nymshifter) Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
    Felicity (transgender nymshifter) George R (transgender
    nymshifter) Irving S (transgender nymshifter) Enjoy!

    Alan, you just demonstrated your ignorance again! Both accidents were
    caused by pilots flying so slow that the aircraft stalled and spun.
    There was insufficient altitude for recovery. The aircraft went in
    more or less vertically at high speed, killing the pilots. in both
    case a few knots more airspeed and no spins would have happened. This
    can be insidious. I know, I have had an unintentional aircraft spin.
    I'm sure you have had the same in a race car.

    Liarboy, you're not answering me.

    And yes: I have had quite a few spins in a race car. That's because that
    is the regime where one has to drive a racing car if you want to be fast.

    One of your accidents makes my point for me.

    '
    The MayDay STOL competition in Wayne, Nebraska, came to an abrupt and
    tragic halt on Friday evening with the loss of pilot Tom Dafoe, who was piloting a 1946 Cessna 140.

    Dafoe was flying in the fourth heat of a traditional STOL pickup match
    when the Cessna entered a stall-spin around 300 feet agl, from straight-and-level flight with airspeed low, according to eyewitnesses
    on the scene at Wayne Municipal-Stan Morris Field. The subsequent impact
    took Dafoe’s life.'

    Dafoe was doing something similar to what I do: taking risks in order to
    win a competition.

    The other? Well, read for yourself:

    'Although the pilot had received 1.0 hours of flight training in the
    accident airplane in the 30 days before the accident, he only performed
    2 solo takeoffs and landings. This training did not include training on
    stall characteristics, which the Federal Aviation Administration
    recommends. If the pilot had received stall training in the airplane, he
    would likely have been aware of the appropriate airspeeds and pitch
    attitudes to use while maneuvering after takeoff, and this may have
    prevented the accident. '

    He didn't die because aviating is inherently risky:

    he died because he was IGNORANT.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Fri May 27 18:54:55 2022
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 2:27:12 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote: >>>>> On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4, Alan
    wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event as a >>>>>>>>>>>>> professional driving coach with a company
    offering >>>>>>>>>>>>> short (mostly 3 lap) "race experiences"
    to people >>>>>>>>>>>>> with no previous track experience. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang (manual >>>>>>>>>>>>> gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each set up with an >>>>>>>>>>>>> auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill switch for >>>>>>>>>>>>> the passenger seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses >>>>>>>>>>>>> with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22 people >>>>>>>>>>>>> huge thrills and some insight into what it's like >>>>>>>>>>>>> to drive a car at speed. The day started under
    wet >>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions, but got a lot better later on
    until we >>>>>>>>>>>>> finished up on a completely dry track. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    A lot were timid, but a few became less timid
    with >>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one really
    struggled to stay within the limits of grip (in
    the >>>>>>>>>>>>> worst car for driving in the wet; the
    Camaro's >>>>>>>>>>>>> throttle pedal is not very progressive),
    and there >>>>>>>>>>>>> were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from >>>>>>>>>>>>> spinning with the aux brake. Almost
    everyone needed >>>>>>>>>>>>> some demonstration of just how
    hard a car will >>>>>>>>>>>>> really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers with
    about >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 laps as driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor >>>>>>>>>>>>> of cancer, who had paid for rides in two
    of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> cars (I think she went out in the Mustang
    after her >>>>>>>>>>>>> first go with me in the Camaro) asked
    if she ride >>>>>>>>>>>>> as a passenger with me for two more
    laps to really >>>>>>>>>>>>> see what the car could do. I think
    I gave her a >>>>>>>>>>>>> sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on my own, >>>>>>>>>>>>> warming up the car and also recording some video >>>>>>>>>>>>> for tutorial video for the company to offer for >>>>>>>>>>>>> those coming to the next event to actually see
    what >>>>>>>>>>>>> they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually >>>>>>>>>>>>> get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a Thursday in >>>>>>>>>>>>> May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g> Maybe
    next >>>>>>>>>>>> time they’ll have a 911 …preferably an old
    one so >>>>>>>>>>>> that you can have fun invoking lift
    throttle >>>>>>>>>>>> oversteer to hang the back end waaaay
    out. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Believe me: there was no problem getting power-on >>>>>>>>>>> oversteer out of the Camaro... ...especially when
    the >>>>>>>>>>> track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer, that the
    old >>>>>>>>>> “engine way in back” early 911’s were notorious for. >>>>>>>>>> Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration >>>>>>>>>> getting off the throttle in the corner
    & the back end >>>>>>>>>> comes out as you’re slowing…big old pendulum. >>>>>>>>> Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the
    edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer >>>>>>>>>> rotation and power-push the nose back to
    where you want >>>>>>>>>> it to be. Otherwise, you end up going backwards… >>>>>>>>> Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you
    fucking >>>>>> retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can
    hit in >>>>> comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing
    60mph, and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s
    of feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift
    when you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying
    and the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling
    hundreds of feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble
    from a wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me
    hitting a wall. >>>
    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means
    hitting a wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid
    flying in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap
    (if they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look
    them up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens
    to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might
    lead to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.
    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was taught as
    a novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.
    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like
    this guy, too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=60801 7045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=deta il&FORM=VIRE

    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-n ebraska/

    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a
    lot better than an aircraft spin into the ground.
    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end in the
    former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking about
    would be directly comparing the two.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Amos P (transgender nymshifter)
    Jerry C. (same attention seeking nymshifter)
    Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
    Felicity (transgender nymshifter)
    George R (transgender nymshifter)
    Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
    Enjoy!


    FFS what is the excuse for not recognising sig separators.

    I thought only Betty was that ignorant. Are you Betty or just imitating
    him (or her if he still claims to be a woman).



    Alan,

    Nope, wake up!

    you just demonstrated your ignorance again! Both accidents

    I didn't refer to any accidents.

    You just demonstrated your ignorance TWICE!

    --
    Bozo bin
    Amos P (transgender nymshifter)
    Jerry C. (same attention seeking nymshifter)
    Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
    Felicity (transgender nymshifter)
    George R (transgender nymshifter)
    Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun May 29 04:41:55 2022
    On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 2:02:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-27 7:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 2:27:12 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second
    event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly
    3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern
    Mustang (manual gearbox), and a
    Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill
    switch for the passenger seat, full
    racing seats and harnesses with roll
    bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave
    22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive
    a car at speed. The day started under
    wet conditions, but got a lot better
    later on until we finished up on a
    completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became
    less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one
    really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for
    driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very
    progressive), and there were only a
    couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost
    everyone needed some demonstration of
    just how hard a car will really
    stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with
    customers with about 10 laps as
    driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for
    rides in two of the cars (I think she
    went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked
    if she ride as a passenger with me
    for two more laps to really see what
    the car could do. I think I gave her
    a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps
    on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for
    tutorial video for the company to
    offer for those coming to the next
    event to actually see what they're
    supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a
    Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office”
    <g> Maybe next time they’ll have a 911
    …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay
    out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting
    power-on oversteer out of the Camaro...
    ...especially when the track was still
    wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer,
    that the old “engine way in back” early
    911’s were notorious for. Classical
    instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re
    slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than
    most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the
    edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer rotation and power-push the nose
    back to where you want it to be. Otherwise,
    you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK,
    one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you
    fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you
    can hit in comparison to where you place a racing
    car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing
    60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so
    I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not
    1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift
    when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of
    flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds
    of feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble
    from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a
    wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the question:
    what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means
    hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid
    flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap
    (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of such
    accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens
    to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might
    lead to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.
    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was taught as
    a novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.
    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like this guy,
    too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE



    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/



    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a
    lot
    better than an aircraft spin into the ground.
    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end in
    the former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking about
    would be directly comparing the two.

    -- Bozo bin Amos P (transgender nymshifter) Jerry C. (same
    attention seeking nymshifter) Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
    Felicity (transgender nymshifter) George R (transgender
    nymshifter) Irving S (transgender nymshifter) Enjoy!

    Alan, you just demonstrated your ignorance again! Both accidents were caused by pilots flying so slow that the aircraft stalled and spun.
    There was insufficient altitude for recovery. The aircraft went in
    more or less vertically at high speed, killing the pilots. in both
    case a few knots more airspeed and no spins would have happened. This
    can be insidious. I know, I have had an unintentional aircraft spin.
    I'm sure you have had the same in a race car.
    Liarboy, you're not answering me.

    And yes: I have had quite a few spins in a race car. That's because that
    is the regime where one has to drive a racing car if you want to be fast.

    One of your accidents makes my point for me.

    '
    The MayDay STOL competition in Wayne, Nebraska, came to an abrupt and
    tragic halt on Friday evening with the loss of pilot Tom Dafoe, who was piloting a 1946 Cessna 140.

    Dafoe was flying in the fourth heat of a traditional STOL pickup match
    when the Cessna entered a stall-spin around 300 feet agl, from straight-and-level flight with airspeed low, according to eyewitnesses
    on the scene at Wayne Municipal-Stan Morris Field. The subsequent impact took Dafoe’s life.'

    Dafoe was doing something similar to what I do: taking risks in order to
    win a competition.

    The other? Well, read for yourself:

    'Although the pilot had received 1.0 hours of flight training in the accident airplane in the 30 days before the accident, he only performed
    2 solo takeoffs and landings. This training did not include training on stall characteristics, which the Federal Aviation Administration
    recommends. If the pilot had received stall training in the airplane, he would likely have been aware of the appropriate airspeeds and pitch attitudes to use while maneuvering after takeoff, and this may have prevented the accident. '

    He didn't die because aviating is inherently risky:

    he died because he was IGNORANT.

    Defoe was a highly experienced pilot and knew his airplane. The point is that a spin at low altitude in an airplane is basically not survivable. Race car spins are highly survivable. As for sailplanes most of the flight is spent at altitudes where spin
    recovery is possible. But, soaring airspeeds are much closer to stall, typically 1.3-1.4 x Vs1, than powered small aircraft at cruise, typically 2-3 x Vs1. I have experienced a unintentional spin at about 2x Vs1. It was at about 3,000 AGL. Startling, but
    not fatal due to spin recovery training.

    However, even highly experienced pilots have spun in from altitudes where recovery should have been possible. A couple of examples:

    https://generalaviationnews.com/2019/02/13/spin-training-flight-ends-in-fatal-accident/

    https://www.wrtv.com/news/public-safety/ntsb-report-witness-saw-plane-in-nose-down-left-spin-before-deadly-crash-in-montgomery-county#:~:text=The%20crash%20happened%20June%206%20in%20a%20field,Kristen%20Green%2C%2028%2C%20of%20Swisher%2C%20Iowa%20were%
    20killed.

    That last one was not very far from here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun May 29 11:14:55 2022
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 8:21:06 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 8:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 7:30:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 7:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    The NTSB provides
    photographs of the aftermath of such accidents - go look them up. >>>>>>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead to a >>>> spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a flight regime that borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above the edge of stall in a steep banked (45 degrees) turn.
    This took me 5 minutes to find:

    'However, physics is beautiful. As it turns out, the minimum sink speed >> at bank angles greater than 0 degrees also increase at exactly the same >> rate as stall speed, which is the square root of 1 divided by the cosine >> of the angle of bank (1/cos(ang))0.5) – the square root of the load
    factor. This is very convenient because if a glider is flown in a
    thermal at the optimum minimum sink speed for the angle of bank chosen, >> the airspeed margin above accelerated stall speed is IDENTICAL to the
    margin in level flight.'

    So no, you're not flying in a flight regime that "borders on a classic
    spin entry"...

    ...unless you're an idiot...

    LOL! You obviously haven't flown a damn thing.
    Me? Almost none at all...

    ...but I was an avid follower of aviation.

    And the guy I just quoted? Lemme see:

    'About the author: Steve is a commercial pilot in single engine
    airplanes, single engine seaplanes, and gliders. He holds an instrument rating and is a Certified Flight Instructor for airplanes, instruments,
    and gliders. He has logged over 4,000 flight hr including over 2,000 hr
    as a flight instructor. He is a retired IBM Engineering Manager and is a member of the Flight Instructor staff at Sugarbush Soaring,
    Warren-Sugarbush Airport, Warren, VT.'

    <http://www.omagdigital.com/publication/?i=402355&article_id=2767735&view=articleBrowser&ver=html5>

    Oops.

    So... ...you fly regularly, so let's see you answer a couple of
    questions about your sailplane.

    What is the stall speed (we'll assume without any ballast)?

    What is the minimum sink speed (same assumption)?

    Hey, Sunshine?

    https://www.alexander-schleicher.de/en/flugzeuge/ash-31-mi/

    Your comments, again, reflect ZERO knowledge of flying sailplanes. Thermal flying involves circling in a rising air mass that is highly non-uniform. Picture smoke going up from a field fire - it is going up and out in all directions, and is constantly
    changing. This is because, due to the conversation of momentum, the rising air must be offset by an equal mass of descending air. This occurs immediately surrounding the rising air column. As a result, there is turbulent mixing of the two air masses. The
    air is rising the fastest at the core, decreasing rapidly as you get away from the center. As a result, the best strategy is to make the tightest circle possible and not to fly at minimum sink. This is very obvious when you are thermalling with another
    glider that is making wider circles - you will easily out-climb them. But it entails flying as slow as possible at extreme bank angles (40 to 45 degrees). Because the air is very turbulent your instantaneous airspeed is varying substantially, and it is
    common to feel an incipient stall multiple times in a single thermal. Add to that that stalls AREN'T the result of flying "too slow," but exceeding the critical angle of attack of airflow over the wing. Airplanes can be stalled at ANY indicated airspeed
    and attitude.

    In a turn, the inside wing is flying slower than the outside wing, so it will stall first. As the outside wing is still generating lift, the glider will begin to roll towards the down wing and may go inverted. In any case, it will quickly degenerate into
    a vertical spin if not arrested. Gliders, by design, are very low drag aircraft, so they pick up speed very quickly in a vertical descent. You will exceed Vne (never exceed speed) in a matter of seconds. Glider pilots are trained in spin recognition and
    recovery, but you will only get one chance to do it correctly: https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/aviation-international-news/2008-05-09/final-report-sailplane-wing-failure-killed-engen-and-friend

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to thomas...@gmail.com on Sun May 29 11:27:00 2022
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 4:41:56 AM UTC-7, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 2:02:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-27 7:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 2:27:12 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second
    event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly
    3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern
    Mustang (manual gearbox), and a
    Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill
    switch for the passenger seat, full
    racing seats and harnesses with roll
    bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave
    22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive
    a car at speed. The day started under
    wet conditions, but got a lot better
    later on until we finished up on a
    completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became
    less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one
    really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for
    driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very
    progressive), and there were only a
    couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost
    everyone needed some demonstration of
    just how hard a car will really
    stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with
    customers with about 10 laps as
    driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for
    rides in two of the cars (I think she
    went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked
    if she ride as a passenger with me
    for two more laps to really see what
    the car could do. I think I gave her
    a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps
    on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for
    tutorial video for the company to
    offer for those coming to the next
    event to actually see what they're
    supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a
    Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g> Maybe next time they’ll have a 911
    …preferably an old one so that you can
    have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay
    out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting
    power-on oversteer out of the Camaro...
    ...especially when the track was still
    wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer,
    that the old “engine way in back” early
    911’s were notorious for. Classical
    instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re
    slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than
    most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the
    edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer rotation and power-push the nose
    back to where you want it to be. Otherwise,
    you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK,
    one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you
    fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you
    can hit in comparison to where you place a racing
    car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing
    60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so
    I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not
    1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift
    when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of
    flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds
    of feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble
    from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a
    wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the question:
    what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means
    hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid
    flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap
    (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of such
    accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens
    to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might
    lead to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.
    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was taught as
    a novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.
    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like this guy,
    too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE



    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/



    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a
    lot
    better than an aircraft spin into the ground.
    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end in
    the former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking about
    would be directly comparing the two.

    -- Bozo bin Amos P (transgender nymshifter) Jerry C. (same
    attention seeking nymshifter) Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
    Felicity (transgender nymshifter) George R (transgender
    nymshifter) Irving S (transgender nymshifter) Enjoy!

    Alan, you just demonstrated your ignorance again! Both accidents were caused by pilots flying so slow that the aircraft stalled and spun. There was insufficient altitude for recovery. The aircraft went in
    more or less vertically at high speed, killing the pilots. in both
    case a few knots more airspeed and no spins would have happened. This can be insidious. I know, I have had an unintentional aircraft spin.
    I'm sure you have had the same in a race car.
    Liarboy, you're not answering me.

    And yes: I have had quite a few spins in a race car. That's because that is the regime where one has to drive a racing car if you want to be fast.

    One of your accidents makes my point for me.

    '
    The MayDay STOL competition in Wayne, Nebraska, came to an abrupt and tragic halt on Friday evening with the loss of pilot Tom Dafoe, who was piloting a 1946 Cessna 140.

    Dafoe was flying in the fourth heat of a traditional STOL pickup match when the Cessna entered a stall-spin around 300 feet agl, from straight-and-level flight with airspeed low, according to eyewitnesses
    on the scene at Wayne Municipal-Stan Morris Field. The subsequent impact took Dafoe’s life.'

    Dafoe was doing something similar to what I do: taking risks in order to win a competition.

    The other? Well, read for yourself:

    'Although the pilot had received 1.0 hours of flight training in the accident airplane in the 30 days before the accident, he only performed
    2 solo takeoffs and landings. This training did not include training on stall characteristics, which the Federal Aviation Administration recommends. If the pilot had received stall training in the airplane, he would likely have been aware of the appropriate airspeeds and pitch attitudes to use while maneuvering after takeoff, and this may have prevented the accident. '

    He didn't die because aviating is inherently risky:

    he died because he was IGNORANT.
    Defoe was a highly experienced pilot and knew his airplane. The point is that a spin at low altitude in an airplane is basically not survivable. Race car spins are highly survivable. As for sailplanes most of the flight is spent at altitudes where spin
    recovery is possible. But, soaring airspeeds are much closer to stall, typically 1.3-1.4 x Vs1, than powered small aircraft at cruise, typically 2-3 x Vs1. I have experienced a unintentional spin at about 2x Vs1. It was at about 3,000 AGL. Startling, but
    not fatal due to spin recovery training.

    However, even highly experienced pilots have spun in from altitudes where recovery should have been possible. A couple of examples:

    https://generalaviationnews.com/2019/02/13/spin-training-flight-ends-in-fatal-accident/

    https://www.wrtv.com/news/public-safety/ntsb-report-witness-saw-plane-in-nose-down-left-spin-before-deadly-crash-in-montgomery-county#:~:text=The%20crash%20happened%20June%206%20in%20a%20field,Kristen%20Green%2C%2028%2C%20of%20Swisher%2C%20Iowa%20were%
    20killed.

    That last one was not very far from here.

    The first article states:

    "The airplane’s Pilot Operating Handbook specified that at least 1,000′ of altitude loss should be expected for a one-turn spin and recovery and that a six-turn spin and recovery may require more than twice that altitude loss because the airplane can
    develop a rapid rate of rotation and a steep nose-down pitch attitude."

    Now, the Fool thinks that we are safe because:

    "You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet from
    the nearest obstacle while flying..."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun May 29 12:16:21 2022
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 7:25:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-26 7:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:55:52 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM UTC-4,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second event
    as a professional driving coach with a
    company offering short (mostly 3 lap)
    "race experiences" to people with no
    previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern Mustang
    (manual gearbox), and a Nissan 370Z, each
    set up with an auxiliary brake pedal and
    engine kill switch for the passenger
    seat, full racing seats and harnesses
    with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave 22
    people huge thrills and some insight into
    what it's like to drive a car at speed.
    The day started under wet conditions, but
    got a lot better later on until we
    finished up on a completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became less
    timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one
    really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for
    driving in the wet; the Camaro's throttle
    pedal is not very progressive), and
    there were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the aux brake.
    Almost everyone needed some demonstration
    of just how hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with customers
    with about 10 laps as driver. One very
    nice lady, a survivor of cancer, who had
    paid for rides in two of the cars (I
    think she went out in the Mustang after
    her first go with me in the Camaro) asked
    if she ride as a passenger with me for
    two more laps to really see what the car
    could do. I think I gave her a sense for
    it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps on
    my own, warming up the car and also
    recording some video for tutorial video
    for the company to offer for those coming
    to the next event to actually see what
    they're supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a
    Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” <g>
    Maybe next time they’ll have a 911
    …preferably an old one so that you can have
    fun invoking lift throttle oversteer to
    hang the back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting
    power-on oversteer out of the Camaro...
    ...especially when the track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer,
    that the old “engine way in back” early 911’s >>>>>>>>>>>> were notorious for. Classical instance was too
    late corner deceleration getting off the
    throttle in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than most
    vehicles, but usually racing cars are closer to
    the edge of that than most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer rotation and power-push the nose back
    to where you want it to be. Otherwise, you end
    up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK, one
    thing... ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you
    fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you can
    hit in comparison to where you place a racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing
    60mph, and I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so I
    typically leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s
    of feet from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift
    when you're doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of flying
    and the hazards involved. Are you subject to falling
    hundreds of feet by a sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble from
    a wind gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a
    wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the question:
    what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means hitting
    a wall at high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid
    flying in a regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap (if
    they want to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of such
    accidents - go look them up.
    So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens to
    you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might lead
    to a spin in the first place!

    Actually, we fly A LOT (20 to 40 percent of total flight time) in a
    flight regime that borders on a classic spin entry: flying just above
    the edge of stall in a steep banked (45 degrees) turn.
    Bullshit.

    Show me one reference that says you do that and why.

    How many of your friends and acquaintances have been killed while
    racing cars?
    Happily, none.

    Just as I thought. Well, I have lost a bunch. The last one was a good friend a couple of years ago. I met with his family and explained the circumstances involving his accident; flying very close to the ridge on a day characterized by a highly turbulent
    airmass. He was thermally close to the ridge trying to keep connected with the thermal going up the slope and above the ridge line. A tail gust probably caused a momentary stall. Stall recovery involves putting the nose down and gaining airspeed, but
    when you are already close to the rocks this is not an option. His wingtip just grazed the top of the ridge, cartwheeling him into the rocky ground. The accident was not survivable and death was instantaneous. This pilot was extremely well qualified with
    thousands of hours of time in glider, commercial and military aircraft.

    The previous one was a few years ago of a local friend that I knew from our beer brewing days. He wanted to learn how to fly gliders and buy one for himself. He asked me about a motorglider, but I advised him not to start out at that level because of
    their exceptional complexity. I advised him to get a pure (unmotorized) glider first and build time in it. At most, get one with a sustainer engine that is only used for self-retrieves. I also advised him to go to a commercial glider operation and get
    full emersion training, which is what he did. There you just stay at the operation as long as it takes to become a safe glider pilot. After he got his license he bought a very good used glider that he flew out of Ephrata, WA, a nearby glider operation.
    He was not far from the airport when he entered into a stall while attempting an off-field landing and crashed.
    http://www.kathrynsreport.com/2017/05/schleicher-asw-28-18e-n63kr-fatal.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Sun May 29 14:57:02 2022
    On 2022-05-29 4:41 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 2:02:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-27 7:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 2:27:12 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS
    wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM
    UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42
    AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my
    second event as a professional
    driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap)
    "race experiences" to people with
    no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern
    Mustang (manual gearbox), and a
    Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine
    kill switch for the passenger
    seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I
    gave 22 people huge thrills and
    some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day
    started under wet conditions, but
    got a lot better later on until
    we finished up on a completely
    dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few
    became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only
    one really struggled to stay
    within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet;
    the Camaro's throttle pedal is
    not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the
    aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how
    hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with
    customers with about 10 laps as
    driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid
    for rides in two of the cars (I
    think she went out in the Mustang
    after her first go with me in the
    Camaro) asked if she ride as a
    passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car
    could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15
    laps on my own, warming up the
    car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the
    company to offer for those coming
    to the next event to actually see
    what they're supposed to be
    seeing when they actually get out
    there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend
    a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the
    office” <g> Maybe next time they’ll
    have a 911 …preferably an old one
    so that you can have fun invoking
    lift throttle oversteer to hang the
    back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem
    getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle
    oversteer, that the old “engine way in
    back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle
    in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse
    than most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to
    the edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop
    the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to
    be. Otherwise, you end up going
    backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three
    dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions
    (OK, one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS,
    you fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything
    you can hit in comparison to where you place a
    racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already
    doing 60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around
    90mph, so I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if
    not 1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic
    lift when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of
    flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling
    hundreds of feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in
    trouble from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting
    a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it
    means hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively
    avoid flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every
    lap (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of
    such accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what
    happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious
    injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that
    might lead to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.
    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was
    taught as a novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning
    out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.
    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like this
    guy, too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE





    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/





    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a
    lot better than an aircraft spin into the ground.
    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end
    in the former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the
    later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking
    about would be directly comparing the two.

    -- Bozo bin Amos P (transgender nymshifter) Jerry C. (same
    attention seeking nymshifter) Michael P. (transgender
    nymshifter) Felicity (transgender nymshifter) George R
    (transgender nymshifter) Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
    Enjoy!

    Alan, you just demonstrated your ignorance again! Both accidents
    were caused by pilots flying so slow that the aircraft stalled
    and spun. There was insufficient altitude for recovery. The
    aircraft went in more or less vertically at high speed, killing
    the pilots. in both case a few knots more airspeed and no spins
    would have happened. This can be insidious. I know, I have had an
    unintentional aircraft spin. I'm sure you have had the same in a
    race car.
    Liarboy, you're not answering me.

    And yes: I have had quite a few spins in a race car. That's because
    that is the regime where one has to drive a racing car if you want
    to be fast.

    One of your accidents makes my point for me.

    ' The MayDay STOL competition in Wayne, Nebraska, came to an abrupt
    and tragic halt on Friday evening with the loss of pilot Tom Dafoe,
    who was piloting a 1946 Cessna 140.

    Dafoe was flying in the fourth heat of a traditional STOL pickup
    match when the Cessna entered a stall-spin around 300 feet agl,
    from straight-and-level flight with airspeed low, according to
    eyewitnesses on the scene at Wayne Municipal-Stan Morris Field. The
    subsequent impact took Dafoe’s life.'

    Dafoe was doing something similar to what I do: taking risks in
    order to win a competition.

    This is where I was talking about Defoe.


    The other? Well, read for yourself:

    'Although the pilot had received 1.0 hours of flight training in
    the accident airplane in the 30 days before the accident, he only
    performed 2 solo takeoffs and landings. This training did not
    include training on stall characteristics, which the Federal
    Aviation Administration recommends. If the pilot had received stall
    training in the airplane, he would likely have been aware of the
    appropriate airspeeds and pitch attitudes to use while maneuvering
    after takeoff, and this may have prevented the accident. '

    He didn't die because aviating is inherently risky:

    he died because he was IGNORANT.

    Defoe was a highly experienced pilot and knew his airplane.

    And he's not the pilot I said was ignorant...

    ...or are you just not bright enough to notice that I addressed each
    incident separately?

    The point
    is that a spin at low altitude in an airplane is basically not
    survivable.

    The point in that case is that Defoe was engaged in a competition where
    flying at the extreme edge of control (stall in this case) is an
    essential element of success.

    Just as racing drivers do.

    It was not NORMAL flying where avoiding such extremes is the whole point.

    Race car spins are highly survivable.

    Dude. The fact that they both happen to have the same name doesn't make
    them comparable events.

    As for sailplanes
    most of the flight is spent at altitudes where spin recovery is
    possible. But, soaring airspeeds are much closer to stall, typically
    1.3-1.4 x Vs1, than powered small aircraft at cruise, typically 2-3 x
    Vs1.

    Yes. That's true.

    But you're flying in a regime where you can pay essentially as much
    attention to your airspeed as you require. I showed you the numbers for
    Tom's Schleisher (sp?) and are you seriously claiming there actually
    would be great difficulty for you to keep airspeed from falling by MORE
    than 20%?

    I have experienced a unintentional spin at about 2x Vs1. It was
    at about 3,000 AGL. Startling, but not fatal due to spin recovery
    training.

    Dude... ...for comparison:

    With your aircraft properly trimmed in straight and level flight, how
    long do you feel you could safely remove your hands from the controls?


    However, even highly experienced pilots have spun in from altitudes
    where recovery should have been possible. A couple of examples:

    https://generalaviationnews.com/2019/02/13/spin-training-flight-ends-in-fatal-accident/

    "spin TRAINING"

    In short, the aircraft was deliberately departed from controlled flight.



    https://www.wrtv.com/news/public-safety/ntsb-report-witness-saw-plane-in-nose-down-left-spin-before-deadly-crash-in-montgomery-county#:~:text=The%20crash%20happened%20June%206%20in%20a%20field,Kristen%20Green%2C%2028%2C%20of%20Swisher%2C%20Iowa%20were%
    20killed.

    That last one was not very far from here.

    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.

    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...

    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes spinning a
    somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun May 29 17:07:36 2022
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 2:57:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 4:41 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 2:02:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-27 7:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 2:27:12 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS
    wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM
    UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42
    AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my
    second event as a professional
    driving coach with a company
    offering short (mostly 3 lap)
    "race experiences" to people with
    no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern
    Mustang (manual gearbox), and a
    Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine
    kill switch for the passenger
    seat, full racing seats and
    harnesses with roll bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I
    gave 22 people huge thrills and
    some insight into what it's like
    to drive a car at speed. The day
    started under wet conditions, but
    got a lot better later on until
    we finished up on a completely
    dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few
    became less timid with
    instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only
    one really struggled to stay
    within the limits of grip (in the
    worst car for driving in the wet;
    the Camaro's throttle pedal is
    not very progressive), and there
    were only a couple who I need to
    prevent from spinning with the
    aux brake. Almost everyone needed
    some demonstration of just how
    hard a car will really stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with
    customers with about 10 laps as
    driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid
    for rides in two of the cars (I
    think she went out in the Mustang
    after her first go with me in the
    Camaro) asked if she ride as a
    passenger with me for two more
    laps to really see what the car
    could do. I think I gave her a
    sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15
    laps on my own, warming up the
    car and also recording some video
    for tutorial video for the
    company to offer for those coming
    to the next event to actually see
    what they're supposed to be
    seeing when they actually get out
    there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend
    a Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the
    office” <g> Maybe next time they’ll >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a 911 …preferably an old one
    so that you can have fun invoking
    lift throttle oversteer to hang the
    back end waaaay out.

    Believe me: there was no problem
    getting power-on oversteer out of the
    Camaro... ...especially when the
    track was still wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle
    oversteer, that the old “engine way in
    back” early 911’s were notorious for.
    Classical instance was too late corner
    deceleration getting off the throttle
    in the corner & the back end comes out
    as you’re slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse
    than most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to
    the edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop
    the oversteer rotation and power-push
    the nose back to where you want it to
    be. Otherwise, you end up going
    backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three
    dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions
    (OK, one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS,
    you fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything
    you can hit in comparison to where you place a
    racing car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already
    doing 60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around
    90mph, so I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if
    not 1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic
    lift when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of
    flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling
    hundreds of feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in
    trouble from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting
    a wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the
    question: what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it
    means hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively
    avoid flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every
    lap (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of
    such accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what
    happens to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious
    injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that
    might lead to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.
    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was
    taught as a novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning
    out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.
    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like this
    guy, too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE





    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/





    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a
    lot better than an aircraft spin into the ground.
    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end
    in the former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the
    later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking
    about would be directly comparing the two.

    -- Bozo bin Amos P (transgender nymshifter) Jerry C. (same
    attention seeking nymshifter) Michael P. (transgender
    nymshifter) Felicity (transgender nymshifter) George R
    (transgender nymshifter) Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
    Enjoy!

    Alan, you just demonstrated your ignorance again! Both accidents
    were caused by pilots flying so slow that the aircraft stalled
    and spun. There was insufficient altitude for recovery. The
    aircraft went in more or less vertically at high speed, killing
    the pilots. in both case a few knots more airspeed and no spins
    would have happened. This can be insidious. I know, I have had an
    unintentional aircraft spin. I'm sure you have had the same in a
    race car.
    Liarboy, you're not answering me.

    And yes: I have had quite a few spins in a race car. That's because
    that is the regime where one has to drive a racing car if you want
    to be fast.

    One of your accidents makes my point for me.

    ' The MayDay STOL competition in Wayne, Nebraska, came to an abrupt
    and tragic halt on Friday evening with the loss of pilot Tom Dafoe,
    who was piloting a 1946 Cessna 140.

    Dafoe was flying in the fourth heat of a traditional STOL pickup
    match when the Cessna entered a stall-spin around 300 feet agl,
    from straight-and-level flight with airspeed low, according to
    eyewitnesses on the scene at Wayne Municipal-Stan Morris Field. The
    subsequent impact took Dafoe’s life.'

    Dafoe was doing something similar to what I do: taking risks in
    order to win a competition.
    This is where I was talking about Defoe.

    The other? Well, read for yourself:

    'Although the pilot had received 1.0 hours of flight training in
    the accident airplane in the 30 days before the accident, he only
    performed 2 solo takeoffs and landings. This training did not
    include training on stall characteristics, which the Federal
    Aviation Administration recommends. If the pilot had received stall
    training in the airplane, he would likely have been aware of the
    appropriate airspeeds and pitch attitudes to use while maneuvering
    after takeoff, and this may have prevented the accident. '

    He didn't die because aviating is inherently risky:

    he died because he was IGNORANT.

    Defoe was a highly experienced pilot and knew his airplane.
    And he's not the pilot I said was ignorant...

    ...or are you just not bright enough to notice that I addressed each incident separately?
    The point
    is that a spin at low altitude in an airplane is basically not
    survivable.
    The point in that case is that Defoe was engaged in a competition where flying at the extreme edge of control (stall in this case) is an
    essential element of success.

    Just as racing drivers do.

    It was not NORMAL flying where avoiding such extremes is the whole point.
    Race car spins are highly survivable.
    Dude. The fact that they both happen to have the same name doesn't make
    them comparable events.
    As for sailplanes
    most of the flight is spent at altitudes where spin recovery is
    possible. But, soaring airspeeds are much closer to stall, typically 1.3-1.4 x Vs1, than powered small aircraft at cruise, typically 2-3 x
    Vs1.
    Yes. That's true.

    But you're flying in a regime where you can pay essentially as much attention to your airspeed as you require. I showed you the numbers for Tom's Schleisher (sp?) and are you seriously claiming there actually
    would be great difficulty for you to keep airspeed from falling by MORE
    than 20%?
    I have experienced a unintentional spin at about 2x Vs1. It was
    at about 3,000 AGL. Startling, but not fatal due to spin recovery training.
    Dude... ...for comparison:

    With your aircraft properly trimmed in straight and level flight, how
    long do you feel you could safely remove your hands from the controls?

    However, even highly experienced pilots have spun in from altitudes
    where recovery should have been possible. A couple of examples:

    https://generalaviationnews.com/2019/02/13/spin-training-flight-ends-in-fatal-accident/
    "spin TRAINING"

    In short, the aircraft was deliberately departed from controlled flight.


    https://www.wrtv.com/news/public-safety/ntsb-report-witness-saw-plane-in-nose-down-left-spin-before-deadly-crash-in-montgomery-county#:~:text=The%20crash%20happened%20June%206%20in%20a%20field,Kristen%20Green%2C%2028%2C%20of%20Swisher%2C%20Iowa%
    20were%20killed.

    That last one was not very far from here.
    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.

    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...

    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes spinning a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.

    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at driving a race car (and good for you), and I pointed out that we do that, and more, in 3 dimensions. You, being the person you are, felt compelled to denigrate that, making it sound
    pretty damn easy. Well, it isn't. Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights last many hours, and there are hours more of preparation. It can be physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the entire time. I tell my
    golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf game, I just come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad day flying I am dead. I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about the activities of others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to TomS on Sun May 29 18:48:00 2022
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 7:07:38 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 2:57:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 4:41 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    ….
    The point
    is that a spin at low altitude in an airplane is basically not survivable.

    The point in that case is that Defoe was engaged in a
    competition where
    flying at the extreme edge of control (stall in this case) is an
    essential element of success.

    Just as racing drivers do.

    It was not NORMAL flying where avoiding such extremes is the whole point.

    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.
    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...
    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes spinning
    a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.

    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at driving a race car (and good for you), …

    I read it as merely a report of a “nice day out”. Any of us could do the same,
    on any variety of subjects. Case in point, I could relate a recent scuba dive over fatally deep waters with sharks & stuff to make it an entertaining read.


    … and I pointed out that we do that, and more, in 3 dimensions.

    Nah, you were merely jealous and tried to compensate. Problem is that your ‘Fun’ has larger safety margins which undermined your brag attempt.

    You, being the person you are, felt compelled to denigrate that,

    Except he was spot-on, which made you even more mad & jealous.

    making it sound pretty damn easy.

    Projection attempt.

    Well, it isn't.

    Not at your age or health. Alan’s got a big advantage on you there.

    Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights last many
    hours, and there are hours more of preparation. It can be physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the entire time.

    Alan already debunked that one when he asked how many seconds you
    could let go of the wheel. Similarly, your heart rate isn’t going to be 120+ for the duration either.

    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf game, I just come
    back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad day flying I am dead.

    Which has happened to you how many times? /s

    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about the activities of others.

    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating others.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun May 29 23:07:58 2022
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 6:48:02 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 7:07:38 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 2:57:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 4:41 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    ….
    The point
    is that a spin at low altitude in an airplane is basically not survivable.

    The point in that case is that Defoe was engaged in a
    competition where
    flying at the extreme edge of control (stall in this case) is an essential element of success.

    Just as racing drivers do.

    It was not NORMAL flying where avoiding such extremes is the whole point.

    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.
    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...
    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes spinning
    a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.

    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at driving
    a race car (and good for you), …

    I read it as merely a report of a “nice day out”. Any of us could do the same,
    on any variety of subjects. Case in point, I could relate a recent scuba dive
    over fatally deep waters with sharks & stuff to make it an entertaining read.


    … and I pointed out that we do that, and more, in 3 dimensions.

    Nah, you were merely jealous and tried to compensate. Problem is that your ‘Fun’ has larger safety margins which undermined your brag attempt.
    You, being the person you are, felt compelled to denigrate that,
    Except he was spot-on, which made you even more mad & jealous.
    making it sound pretty damn easy.
    Projection attempt.

    Well, it isn't.

    Not at your age or health. Alan’s got a big advantage on you there.
    Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights last many
    hours, and there are hours more of preparation. It can be physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the entire time.
    Alan already debunked that one when he asked how many seconds you
    could let go of the wheel. Similarly, your heart rate isn’t going to be 120+
    for the duration either.
    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf game, I just come
    back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad day flying I am dead.
    Which has happened to you how many times? /s

    HA HA HA HA! In fact, I have nearly killed myself several times, but you are too ignorant to understand the close calls, like launching with a disconnected elevator.

    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about the activities of others.
    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating others.

    No, the Fool is the one on this thread that is guilty of that. Myself and Thomas have attempted to set you guys straight on your misconceptions. You are just another enabler that promulgates the bad behavior.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon May 30 05:36:36 2022
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 1:07:59 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 6:48:02 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 7:07:38 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 2:57:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 4:41 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    ….
    The point
    is that a spin at low altitude in an airplane is basically not survivable.

    The point in that case is that Defoe was engaged in a
    competition where
    flying at the extreme edge of control (stall in this case) is an essential element of success.

    Just as racing drivers do.

    It was not NORMAL flying where avoiding such extremes is the whole point.

    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.
    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...
    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes spinning
    a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.

    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at driving
    a race car (and good for you), …

    I read it as merely a report of a “nice day out”. Any of us could do the same,
    on any variety of subjects. Case in point, I could relate a recent scuba dive
    over fatally deep waters with sharks & stuff to make it an entertaining read.


    … and I pointed out that we do that, and more, in 3 dimensions.

    Nah, you were merely jealous and tried to compensate. Problem is that your ‘Fun’ has larger safety margins which undermined your brag attempt.
    You, being the person you are, felt compelled to denigrate that,
    Except he was spot-on, which made you even more mad & jealous.
    making it sound pretty damn easy.
    Projection attempt.

    Well, it isn't.

    Not at your age or health. Alan’s got a big advantage on you there.
    Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights last many
    hours, and there are hours more of preparation. It can be physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the entire time.
    Alan already debunked that one when he asked how many seconds you
    could let go of the wheel. Similarly, your heart rate isn’t going to be 120+
    for the duration either.
    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf game, I just come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad day flying I am dead.
    Which has happened to you how many times? /s

    HA HA HA HA! In fact, I have nearly killed myself several times,

    Better luck next time.

    …but you are too ignorant to understand the close calls, like launching with a disconnected elevator.

    That sounds like a procedural safety failure. Why was there no
    engineered interlock to prevent it? Is that inherent to just your
    particular brand/model of glider? If so, then why did you accept
    that risk? Particularly as at your age, you are in cognitive decline.



    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about the activities of others.

    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating others.

    No, …


    I expected as much from you.

    …the Fool is the one on this thread that is guilty of that. Myself and Thomas
    have attempted to set you guys straight on your misconceptions. You are
    just another enabler that promulgates the bad behavior.

    The “bad behavior” here was your maliciously pissing on a benign OT post.

    And the claimed misconceptions are your own fault, for refusing to answer direct questions to determine if risk envelopes are actually comparable,
    or if you’re guilty again of exaggerating. Withholding said details means that you’re invariably grandstanding.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon May 30 14:31:00 2022
    TomS wrote:

    The first article states:

    "The airplane’s Pilot Operating Handbook specified that at least
    1,000′ of altitude loss should be expected for a one-turn spin and
    recovery and that a six-turn spin and recovery may require more than
    twice that altitude loss because the airplane can develop a rapid
    rate of rotation and a steep nose-down pitch attitude."

    Now, the Fool thinks that we are safe because:

    "You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet from
    the nearest obstacle while flying..."

    How often have you found yourself in a perilous, life threatening spin,
    Betty?

    What are the most common causes for fatal glider crashes in the US, Boo?

    I don't know what this thread is really about but I do see a couple of
    guys making some pretty dumb arguments.

    A key issue that comes from studying each individual spinning accident
    is that in almost all cases it appeared that the pilot was
    concentrating on something other than flying the glider at the time of
    the accident. In other words, in the majority of spinning accidents the
    pilot appears to have been distracted.

    IOW they don't happen much unless you aren't paying attention.

    This is a rather different to the circumstances during motor racing so
    as I said before it's apples and oranges and anyone silly enough to
    arguing differently has no fucking clue what they are on about.

    ======================================================================== ===========

    I thought the findings of a French study were also interesting.

    3.1 Some Characteristics of the Accidents Studied

    Relating to pilots:

    accidents which occur to young pilots (under 25) are, proportionally,
    less frequent and less serious than accidents which occur to older
    pilots (70 and over),

    ^^^^^ You should make not of this Betty.

    individual pilots are more susceptible to accidents than pilots flying
    within an organised structure,
    a low level of experience does not appear to constitute a significant
    risk factor,

    Relating to the environment:

    accidents occurring in the Alps are often more serious than those
    occurring in other regions of France (double the mortality rate for an identical number of accidents),
    accidents occurring during landing phases (in the country or at an
    aerodrome) have less serious physical consequences compared to those
    occurring during cruise phases,
    the death rate is higher in accidents involving motorised gliders.

    3.2 The Most Frequent Causes of Accidents

    The study shows that the main causes leading the most frequent and the
    most serious accidents are:

    failings in pre-flight actions, which include both participation in
    briefings and pre-takeoff checks,
    erroneous evaluation of meteorological conditions. This may lead to a
    collision with high ground,
    inappropriate piloting actions (confusion between controls or
    inappropriate actions on the stick), accentuated by lack of recent
    experience or on type,

    ^^^^^^ Again make note Betty, it seems confused old men really are at
    risk of more accidents.

    late decision-making to return to the aerodrome or to land in an
    identified site.

    HTH.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon May 30 14:38:13 2022
    TomS wrote:

    HA HA HA HA! In fact, I have nearly killed myself several times, but
    you are too ignorant to understand the close calls, like launching
    with a disconnected elevator.


    Incompetent pre-flight check?

    It's amusing that your brag is that you are so poor a pilot that you
    frequently find yourself in unnecessarily perilous situations.

    I never/rarely found gliding perilous but then I was a young man with
    all my faculties.

    Navigating in very low cloud was tricky but then again I had a motor on
    that occasion so not too perilous.

    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about
    the activities of others.
    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating
    others.

    No, the Fool is the one on this thread that is guilty of that. Myself
    and Thomas have attempted to set you guys straight on your
    misconceptions.

    They look to be your misconceptions, old girl.

    You are just another enabler that promulgates the bad
    behavior.

    We are all guilty of enabling you; I'll give you that, Boo Hoo.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Mon May 30 12:38:13 2022
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 10:38:15 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    HA HA HA HA! In fact, I have nearly killed myself several times, but
    you are too ignorant to understand the close calls, like launching
    with a disconnected elevator.

    Incompetent pre-flight check?

    It's amusing that your brag is that you are so poor a pilot that you frequently find yourself in unnecessarily perilous situations.

    I never/rarely found gliding perilous but then I was a young man with
    all my faculties.

    Navigating in very low cloud was tricky but then again I had a motor on
    that occasion so not too perilous.
    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about
    the activities of others.
    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating
    others.

    No, the Fool is the one on this thread that is guilty of that. Myself
    and Thomas have attempted to set you guys straight on your
    misconceptions.
    They look to be your misconceptions, old girl.
    You are just another enabler that promulgates the bad
    behavior.
    We are all guilty of enabling you; I'll give you that, Boo Hoo.

    The Peckerhead loves when you all shit on him. It is not enabling at all, it is performing a public service. Giving attention to a really sad case, really sad.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Mon May 30 13:32:14 2022
    On 2022-05-30 7:38 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    HA HA HA HA! In fact, I have nearly killed myself several times, but
    you are too ignorant to understand the close calls, like launching
    with a disconnected elevator.


    Incompetent pre-flight check?

    It's amusing that your brag is that you are so poor a pilot that you frequently find yourself in unnecessarily perilous situations.

    I never/rarely found gliding perilous but then I was a young man with
    all my faculties.

    Navigating in very low cloud was tricky but then again I had a motor on
    that occasion so not too perilous.

    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about
    the activities of others.
    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating
    others.

    No, the Fool is the one on this thread that is guilty of that. Myself
    and Thomas have attempted to set you guys straight on your
    misconceptions.

    They look to be your misconceptions, old girl.

    You are just another enabler that promulgates the bad
    behavior.

    We are all guilty of enabling you; I'll give you that, Boo Hoo.

    The answer is found in this simple comparison:

    In a properly trimmed aircraft, you can take your hands of the control
    for quite a long stretch of time. You might choose not to...

    ...but you could.

    At the track, I can take both hands off the wheel for at most about 7
    seconds (from the point where I complete turn 9 and drive straight up
    the main straight until I begin braking for turn 1).

    And that's assuming that there are no other cars in close proximity...

    ...which happens very rarely on a busy track.

    I'm often driving quite literally within two or three feet of the car
    either in front or (hopefully) behind.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon May 30 13:24:52 2022
    On 2022-05-29 11:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 6:48:02 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 7:07:38 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 2:57:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 4:41 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    …. The point is that a spin at low altitude in an airplane is
    basically not survivable.

    The point in that case is that Defoe was engaged in a
    competition where flying at the extreme edge of control (stall
    in this case) is an essential element of success.

    Just as racing drivers do.

    It was not NORMAL flying where avoiding such extremes is the
    whole point.

    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious. Spins in
    aircraft can be very dangerous, yes... ...and that is why you
    fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes
    spinning a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.

    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are
    at driving a race car (and good for you), …

    I read it as merely a report of a “nice day out”. Any of us could
    do the same, on any variety of subjects. Case in point, I could
    relate a recent scuba dive over fatally deep waters with sharks &
    stuff to make it an entertaining read.


    … and I pointed out that we do that, and more, in 3 dimensions.

    Nah, you were merely jealous and tried to compensate. Problem is
    that your ‘Fun’ has larger safety margins which undermined your
    brag attempt.
    You, being the person you are, felt compelled to denigrate that,
    Except he was spot-on, which made you even more mad & jealous.
    making it sound pretty damn easy.
    Projection attempt.

    Well, it isn't.

    Not at your age or health. Alan’s got a big advantage on you
    there.
    Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights last
    many hours, and there are hours more of preparation. It can be
    physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game
    the entire time.
    Alan already debunked that one when he asked how many seconds you
    could let go of the wheel. Similarly, your heart rate isn’t going
    to be 120+ for the duration either.
    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf game, I just
    come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad day flying
    I am dead.
    Which has happened to you how many times? /s

    HA HA HA HA! In fact, I have nearly killed myself several times, but
    you are too ignorant to understand the close calls, like launching
    with a disconnected elevator.


    So you're incompetent in the air AND in your "hours of preparation", right?

    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about
    the activities of others.
    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating
    others.

    No, the Fool is the one on this thread that is guilty of that. Myself
    and Thomas have attempted to set you guys straight on your
    misconceptions. You are just another enabler that promulgates the bad behavior.

    Sorry, Sunshine.

    But I wasn't denigrating anyone and didn't even after you denigrated
    race driving.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon May 30 13:21:16 2022
    On 2022-05-29 5:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    That last one was not very far from here.
    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.

    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...

    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes
    spinning a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.
    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at
    driving a race car (and good for you),

    That's a lie.

    and I pointed out that we do
    that, and more, in 3 dimensions.

    With a huge amount more space between you and anything you can hit...

    ...and trying to stay as far away from the limit as you can pretty much
    all the time.

    You, being the person you are, felt
    compelled to denigrate that, making it sound pretty damn easy. Well,

    I didn't denigrate anything.

    it isn't. Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights
    last many hours, and there are hours more of preparation.

    You think there aren't hours of preparation for a race, Sunshine?

    It can be
    physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the
    entire time.

    And driving a racing car can't be physically gruelling?

    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf
    game, I just come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad
    day flying I am dead. I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit
    more humble about the activities of others.

    Ummmm...

    ...no.

    In flying, just as in racing, there can be lots of "bad days" that don't
    come close to killing you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon May 30 13:17:55 2022
    On 2022-05-29 11:27 a.m., TomS wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 4:41:56 AM UTC-7, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 2:02:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-27 7:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 2:27:12 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 10:55:52 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-25 7:52 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 7:51:58 PM UTC-7, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:47:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-23 7:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 10:06:45 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 9:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 9:39:31 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 8:46 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 7:17:43 PM UTC-7,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 7:05 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 6:56:27 PM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-20 3:40 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 20, 2022 at 11:11:42 AM
    UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    I spent yesterday doing my second
    event as a professional driving coach
    with a company offering short (mostly
    3 lap) "race experiences" to people
    with no previous track experience.

    Three cars—modern Camaro, modern
    Mustang (manual gearbox), and a
    Nissan 370Z, each set up with an
    auxiliary brake pedal and engine kill
    switch for the passenger seat, full
    racing seats and harnesses with roll
    bar added.

    Running in the Camaro all day, I gave
    22 people huge thrills and some
    insight into what it's like to drive
    a car at speed. The day started under
    wet conditions, but got a lot better
    later on until we finished up on a
    completely dry track.

    A lot were timid, but a few became
    less timid with instruction.

    A few were less timid, but only one
    really struggled to stay within the
    limits of grip (in the worst car for
    driving in the wet; the Camaro's
    throttle pedal is not very
    progressive), and there were only a
    couple who I need to prevent from
    spinning with the aux brake. Almost
    everyone needed some demonstration of
    just how hard a car will really
    stop.

    All in all, I did 75 laps with
    customers with about 10 laps as
    driver. One very nice lady, a
    survivor of cancer, who had paid for
    rides in two of the cars (I think she
    went out in the Mustang after her
    first go with me in the Camaro) asked
    if she ride as a passenger with me
    for two more laps to really see what
    the car could do. I think I gave her
    a sense for it.

    And I also did probably about 15 laps
    on my own, warming up the car and
    also recording some video for
    tutorial video for the company to
    offer for those coming to the next
    event to actually see what they're
    supposed to be seeing when they
    actually get out there.

    All-in-all, a great way to spend a
    Thursday in May.

    :-)


    Sounds like a good day “at the office” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g> Maybe next time they’ll have a 911 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> …preferably an old one so that you can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have fun invoking lift throttle
    oversteer to hang the back end waaaay
    out.

    Believe me: there was no problem getting
    power-on oversteer out of the Camaro...
    ...especially when the track was still
    wet.

    Oh, understood.

    I was referring to LIFT throttle oversteer,
    that the old “engine way in back” early
    911’s were notorious for. Classical
    instance was too late corner deceleration
    getting off the throttle in the corner &
    the back end comes out as you’re
    slowing…big old pendulum.
    Believe me, I understand that, too!

    Early Porsches definitely had it worse than
    most
    vehicles, >>>>>>>>> but usually racing cars are closer to the
    edge of that than >>>>>>>>> most road vehicles.

    Recovery is to step on the gas, to stop the
    oversteer rotation and power-push the nose
    back to where you want it to be. Otherwise,
    you end up going backwards…
    Yup. I teach it.

    :-D

    Next time, try doing this in three dimensions.
    Please.

    There's nothing to hit in three dimensions (OK,
    one
    thing... >>>>>>> ...but you tend to do all the fancy
    manoeuvring well away from >>>>>>> the ground).

    Oh, REALLY? You haven't flown in the MOUNTAINS, you
    fucking retard!!
    Sunshine...

    ...you stay a HUGE distance away from anything you
    can hit in comparison to where you place a racing
    car.

    At the exit of turn two at Mission, I'm already doing
    60mph,
    and >>>>> I'm usually within two feet of the wall.

    On the front straight, that speed is around 90mph, so
    I
    typically >>>>> leave 3-4 feet.

    You keep your little glider literally 100s if not
    1,000s of
    feet >>>>> from the nearest obstacle while flying...

    ...and you're not near the limit for aerodynamic lift
    when
    you're >>>>> doing it.

    You keep on demonstrating your TOTAL IGNORANCE of
    flying and
    the >>>> hazards involved. Are you subject to falling hundreds
    of feet by a >>>> sudden wind gust?
    I don't need to move "hundreds of feet" to be in trouble
    from a
    wind >>> gust. Less than 6 feet could result in me hitting a
    wall.

    Whereas "hundreds of feet" in a glider means...

    ...stil being in the air.
    I don't think so. You also never answered the question:
    what happens to you when you spin out.
    It depends where I spin. In a lot of places, it means
    hitting a
    wall at >>> high speed.

    But you've never acknowledged that pilots actively avoid
    flying
    in a >>> regime where a spin is imminent...

    ...where racing drivers operate in that regime every lap
    (if
    they want >>> to win).

    :-)
    The NTSB provides photographs of the aftermath of such
    accidents - go look them
    up. >>> So?
    You just keep on demonstrating ignorance, Fool.

    Also, you STILL haven't answered the question: what happens
    to you when you spin out?
    It depends.

    Sometimes nothing.

    Sometimes, you hit a wall and risk death or serious injury.

    What happens when you spin out?

    Oh, right!

    You actively avoid operating in the flight regime that might
    lead to a spin in the first place!

    I spin airplanes on purpose. It's pretty fun if you know the
    recovery.
    A stall turn is a standard acrobatic manoeuvre that I was taught as
    a novice. Hardly the same as accidentally spinning out on a track.

    IOW apples and oranges.
    If you do it too close to the ground you WILL die. Like this guy,
    too steep, to slow:


    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=stall+spin+on+final&docid=608017045606266097&mid=06CD0937FA0FDA4815C406CD0937FA0FDA4815C4&view=detail&FORM=VIRE



    Or this one just a few days ago:


    https://www.flyingmag.com/fatal-accident-stops-stol-competition-in-nebraska/



    If you spin a car into a race track wall your survival odds are a
    lot
    better than an aircraft spin into the ground.
    The two bear no relation. A relatively small mistake can end in
    the former. It takes a fairly massive error the end in the later.

    I don't see why anyone who had a clue what they are talking about
    would be directly comparing the two.

    -- Bozo bin Amos P (transgender nymshifter) Jerry C. (same
    attention seeking nymshifter) Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
    Felicity (transgender nymshifter) George R (transgender
    nymshifter) Irving S (transgender nymshifter) Enjoy!

    Alan, you just demonstrated your ignorance again! Both accidents were
    caused by pilots flying so slow that the aircraft stalled and spun.
    There was insufficient altitude for recovery. The aircraft went in
    more or less vertically at high speed, killing the pilots. in both
    case a few knots more airspeed and no spins would have happened. This
    can be insidious. I know, I have had an unintentional aircraft spin.
    I'm sure you have had the same in a race car.
    Liarboy, you're not answering me.

    And yes: I have had quite a few spins in a race car. That's because that >>> is the regime where one has to drive a racing car if you want to be fast. >>>
    One of your accidents makes my point for me.

    '
    The MayDay STOL competition in Wayne, Nebraska, came to an abrupt and
    tragic halt on Friday evening with the loss of pilot Tom Dafoe, who was
    piloting a 1946 Cessna 140.

    Dafoe was flying in the fourth heat of a traditional STOL pickup match
    when the Cessna entered a stall-spin around 300 feet agl, from
    straight-and-level flight with airspeed low, according to eyewitnesses
    on the scene at Wayne Municipal-Stan Morris Field. The subsequent impact >>> took Dafoe’s life.'

    Dafoe was doing something similar to what I do: taking risks in order to >>> win a competition.

    The other? Well, read for yourself:

    'Although the pilot had received 1.0 hours of flight training in the
    accident airplane in the 30 days before the accident, he only performed
    2 solo takeoffs and landings. This training did not include training on
    stall characteristics, which the Federal Aviation Administration
    recommends. If the pilot had received stall training in the airplane, he >>> would likely have been aware of the appropriate airspeeds and pitch
    attitudes to use while maneuvering after takeoff, and this may have
    prevented the accident. '

    He didn't die because aviating is inherently risky:

    he died because he was IGNORANT.
    Defoe was a highly experienced pilot and knew his airplane. The point is that a spin at low altitude in an airplane is basically not survivable. Race car spins are highly survivable. As for sailplanes most of the flight is spent at altitudes where
    spin recovery is possible. But, soaring airspeeds are much closer to stall, typically 1.3-1.4 x Vs1, than powered small aircraft at cruise, typically 2-3 x Vs1. I have experienced a unintentional spin at about 2x Vs1. It was at about 3,000 AGL. Startling,
    but not fatal due to spin recovery training.

    However, even highly experienced pilots have spun in from altitudes where recovery should have been possible. A couple of examples:

    https://generalaviationnews.com/2019/02/13/spin-training-flight-ends-in-fatal-accident/

    https://www.wrtv.com/news/public-safety/ntsb-report-witness-saw-plane-in-nose-down-left-spin-before-deadly-crash-in-montgomery-county#:~:text=The%20crash%20happened%20June%206%20in%20a%20field,Kristen%20Green%2C%2028%2C%20of%20Swisher%2C%20Iowa%20were%
    20killed.

    That last one was not very far from here.

    The first article states:

    "The airplane’s Pilot Operating Handbook specified that at least 1,000′ of altitude loss should be expected for a one-turn spin and recovery and that a six-turn spin and recovery may require more than twice that altitude loss because the airplane
    can develop a rapid rate of rotation and a steep nose-down pitch attitude."

    Now, the Fool thinks that we are safe because:

    "You keep your little glider literally 100s if not 1,000s of feet from
    the nearest obstacle while flying..."


    That was in your comments about horizontal obstacles, Sunshine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 31 07:54:45 2022
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:32:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-30 7:38 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    HA HA HA HA! In fact, I have nearly killed myself several times, but
    you are too ignorant to understand the close calls, like launching
    with a disconnected elevator.


    Incompetent pre-flight check?

    It's amusing that your brag is that you are so poor a pilot that you frequently find yourself in unnecessarily perilous situations.

    I never/rarely found gliding perilous but then I was a young man with
    all my faculties.

    Navigating in very low cloud was tricky but then again I had a motor on that occasion so not too perilous.

    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about
    the activities of others.
    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating
    others.

    No, the Fool is the one on this thread that is guilty of that. Myself
    and Thomas have attempted to set you guys straight on your
    misconceptions.

    They look to be your misconceptions, old girl.

    You are just another enabler that promulgates the bad
    behavior.

    We are all guilty of enabling you; I'll give you that, Boo Hoo.
    The answer is found in this simple comparison:

    In a properly trimmed aircraft, you can take your hands of the control
    for quite a long stretch of time. You might choose not to...

    ...but you could.

    At the track, I can take both hands off the wheel for at most about 7 seconds (from the point where I complete turn 9 and drive straight up
    the main straight until I begin braking for turn 1).

    And that's assuming that there are no other cars in close proximity...

    ...which happens very rarely on a busy track.

    I'm often driving quite literally within two or three feet of the car
    either in front or (hopefully) behind.

    :-)

    Impressive. Really impressive. Thanks for sharing. Wow, to be literally two or three feet of a car going that fast, I could not imagine. I have some new found respect for car racing, how intense. No doubt, one has not lived until they have gone
    round and round in a fast car.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 31 12:42:33 2022
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:32:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-30 7:38 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    HA HA HA HA! In fact, I have nearly killed myself several times, but
    you are too ignorant to understand the close calls, like launching
    with a disconnected elevator.


    Incompetent pre-flight check?

    It's amusing that your brag is that you are so poor a pilot that you frequently find yourself in unnecessarily perilous situations.

    I never/rarely found gliding perilous but then I was a young man with
    all my faculties.

    Navigating in very low cloud was tricky but then again I had a motor on that occasion so not too perilous.

    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble about
    the activities of others.
    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating
    others.

    No, the Fool is the one on this thread that is guilty of that. Myself
    and Thomas have attempted to set you guys straight on your
    misconceptions.

    They look to be your misconceptions, old girl.

    You are just another enabler that promulgates the bad
    behavior.

    We are all guilty of enabling you; I'll give you that, Boo Hoo.
    The answer is found in this simple comparison:

    In a properly trimmed aircraft, you can take your hands of the control
    for quite a long stretch of time. You might choose not to...

    ...but you could.

    At the track, I can take both hands off the wheel for at most about 7
    seconds (from the point where I complete turn 9 and drive straight up
    the main straight until I begin braking for turn 1).

    And that's assuming that there are no other cars in close proximity...

    ...which happens very rarely on a busy track.

    I'm often driving quite literally within two or three feet of the car
    either in front or (hopefully) behind.

    :-)

    Which simply supports that many fatal aircraft accidents begin near airports and near the ground. Car accidents in 2 dimensions also frequently involve space to dissipate energy before coming to a stop compared to 3 dimension aircraft accidents.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 31 12:44:42 2022
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:21:19 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 5:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    That last one was not very far from here.
    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.

    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...

    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes
    spinning a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.
    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at driving a race car (and good for you),
    That's a lie.
    and I pointed out that we do
    that, and more, in 3 dimensions.
    With a huge amount more space between you and anything you can hit...

    ...and trying to stay as far away from the limit as you can pretty much
    all the time.
    You, being the person you are, felt
    compelled to denigrate that, making it sound pretty damn easy. Well,
    I didn't denigrate anything.
    it isn't. Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights
    last many hours, and there are hours more of preparation.
    You think there aren't hours of preparation for a race, Sunshine?
    It can be
    physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the
    entire time.
    And driving a racing car can't be physically gruelling?
    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf
    game, I just come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad
    day flying I am dead. I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit
    more humble about the activities of others.
    Ummmm...

    ...no.

    In flying, just as in racing, there can be lots of "bad days" that don't
    come close to killing you.

    Liarboy Alan, you have bragged about what a great race driver you are many times in a different newsgroup.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue May 31 12:53:06 2022
    On 2022-05-31 12:42 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:32:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-30 7:38 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    HA HA HA HA! In fact, I have nearly killed myself several
    times, but you are too ignorant to understand the close calls,
    like launching with a disconnected elevator.


    Incompetent pre-flight check?

    It's amusing that your brag is that you are so poor a pilot that
    you frequently find yourself in unnecessarily perilous
    situations.

    I never/rarely found gliding perilous but then I was a young man
    with all my faculties.

    Navigating in very low cloud was tricky but then again I had a
    motor on that occasion so not too perilous.

    I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit more humble
    about the activities of others.
    You first, since you already have a bad habit of denigrating
    others.

    No, the Fool is the one on this thread that is guilty of that.
    Myself and Thomas have attempted to set you guys straight on
    your misconceptions.

    They look to be your misconceptions, old girl.

    You are just another enabler that promulgates the bad
    behavior.

    We are all guilty of enabling you; I'll give you that, Boo Hoo.
    The answer is found in this simple comparison:

    In a properly trimmed aircraft, you can take your hands of the
    control for quite a long stretch of time. You might choose not
    to...

    ...but you could.

    At the track, I can take both hands off the wheel for at most about
    7 seconds (from the point where I complete turn 9 and drive
    straight up the main straight until I begin braking for turn 1).

    And that's assuming that there are no other cars in close
    proximity...

    ...which happens very rarely on a busy track.

    I'm often driving quite literally within two or three feet of the
    car either in front or (hopefully) behind.

    :-)

    Which simply supports that many fatal aircraft accidents begin near
    airports and near the ground. Car accidents in 2 dimensions also
    frequently involve space to dissipate energy before coming to a stop
    compared to 3 dimension aircraft accidents.

    This wasn't about accidents.

    This was about how hard it is to do; how much concentration it takes,
    Liarboy.

    And I notice you've bailed on answering the question of how long you can
    take your direction attention away from controlling the aircraft.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to thomas...@gmail.com on Tue May 31 12:54:53 2022
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 3:44:44 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:21:19 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 5:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    That last one was not very far from here.
    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.

    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...

    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes
    spinning a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.
    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at driving a race car (and good for you),
    That's a lie.
    and I pointed out that we do
    that, and more, in 3 dimensions.
    With a huge amount more space between you and anything you can hit...

    ...and trying to stay as far away from the limit as you can pretty much all the time.
    You, being the person you are, felt
    compelled to denigrate that, making it sound pretty damn easy. Well,
    I didn't denigrate anything.
    it isn't. Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights
    last many hours, and there are hours more of preparation.
    You think there aren't hours of preparation for a race, Sunshine?
    It can be
    physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the entire time.
    And driving a racing car can't be physically gruelling?
    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf
    game, I just come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad
    day flying I am dead. I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit
    more humble about the activities of others.
    Ummmm...

    ...no.

    In flying, just as in racing, there can be lots of "bad days" that don't come close to killing you.
    Liarboy Alan, you have bragged about what a great race driver you are many times in a different newsgroup.

    Let him brag if that is what he is doing. There are a lot of great race drivers out there, you would never see them on a group like this. We have a great man here, that takes the time to share about what racing is behind the scenes. He shares
    insights that we could never find elsewhere. When he talks about his races, I almost feel like I am behind the wheel. I can feel the speed, the power, and the blood rush to my loins.

    I have learned from this great man that you have never lived until you have experienced going fast in a powerful streamlined race machine. It is sad that many of us will never experience such a thrill, at least we can experience it vicariously through
    him. How sad, that for so many of us, our lives will be devoid of such rush, the thrills this man must experience going so fast. Cant wait till the next racing report , to say he inspires is a profound understatement.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue May 31 12:54:19 2022
    On 2022-05-31 12:44 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:21:19 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 5:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    That last one was not very far from here.
    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.

    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...

    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes
    spinning a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.
    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at
    driving a race car (and good for you),
    That's a lie.
    and I pointed out that we do
    that, and more, in 3 dimensions.
    With a huge amount more space between you and anything you can hit...

    ...and trying to stay as far away from the limit as you can pretty much
    all the time.
    You, being the person you are, felt
    compelled to denigrate that, making it sound pretty damn easy. Well,
    I didn't denigrate anything.
    it isn't. Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights
    last many hours, and there are hours more of preparation.
    You think there aren't hours of preparation for a race, Sunshine?
    It can be
    physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the
    entire time.
    And driving a racing car can't be physically gruelling?
    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf
    game, I just come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad
    day flying I am dead. I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit
    more humble about the activities of others.
    Ummmm...

    ...no.

    In flying, just as in racing, there can be lots of "bad days" that don't
    come close to killing you.

    Liarboy Alan, you have bragged about what a great race driver you are many times in a different newsgroup.

    But I wasn't bragging in this thread, was I?

    And frankly, you find and post my biggest brag.

    I dare you, asshole.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 31 12:56:35 2022
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 3:54:21 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-31 12:44 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:21:19 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 5:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    That last one was not very far from here.
    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.

    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...

    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes
    spinning a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.
    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at
    driving a race car (and good for you),
    That's a lie.
    and I pointed out that we do
    that, and more, in 3 dimensions.
    With a huge amount more space between you and anything you can hit...

    ...and trying to stay as far away from the limit as you can pretty much
    all the time.
    You, being the person you are, felt
    compelled to denigrate that, making it sound pretty damn easy. Well,
    I didn't denigrate anything.
    it isn't. Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights
    last many hours, and there are hours more of preparation.
    You think there aren't hours of preparation for a race, Sunshine?
    It can be
    physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the
    entire time.
    And driving a racing car can't be physically gruelling?
    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf
    game, I just come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad
    day flying I am dead. I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit
    more humble about the activities of others.
    Ummmm...

    ...no.

    In flying, just as in racing, there can be lots of "bad days" that don't >> come close to killing you.

    Liarboy Alan, you have bragged about what a great race driver you are many times in a different newsgroup.
    But I wasn't bragging in this thread, was I?

    And frankly, you find and post my biggest brag.

    I dare you, asshole.

    As the moderator, why are you calling this man names? Where did he address you in such a manner? I am calling for civility, lets be civil to each other. Wow, if this gets you angry, I would hate to really see you pissed off.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 31 13:01:32 2022
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 3:54:21 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-31 12:44 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:21:19 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 5:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    That last one was not very far from here.
    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.

    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...

    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes
    spinning a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.
    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at
    driving a race car (and good for you),
    That's a lie.
    and I pointed out that we do
    that, and more, in 3 dimensions.
    With a huge amount more space between you and anything you can hit...

    ...and trying to stay as far away from the limit as you can pretty much >> all the time.
    You, being the person you are, felt
    compelled to denigrate that, making it sound pretty damn easy. Well,
    I didn't denigrate anything.
    it isn't. Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights
    last many hours, and there are hours more of preparation.
    You think there aren't hours of preparation for a race, Sunshine?
    It can be
    physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the
    entire time.
    And driving a racing car can't be physically gruelling?
    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf
    game, I just come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad
    day flying I am dead. I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit
    more humble about the activities of others.
    Ummmm...

    ...no.

    In flying, just as in racing, there can be lots of "bad days" that don't >> come close to killing you.

    Liarboy Alan, you have bragged about what a great race driver you are many times in a different newsgroup.
    But I wasn't bragging in this thread, was I?

    And frankly, you find and post my biggest brag.

    I dare you, asshole.

    Sometimes just bringing something up is bragging. It is a form of strategic bragging. Some folks just need to bring things up to show others how successful they are, or the good things they have. Now my little dear man, not saying that about you at
    all, so please dont take it personal at all. Just saying, people brag without coming across as bragging. One of the reasons I waste no time on Facebook.. People talking about their trips, their new cars, the schools their kids are going to. They are
    just bragging.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 31 13:05:00 2022
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 3:54:21 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-31 12:44 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:21:19 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-29 5:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    That last one was not very far from here.
    You seem to be deliberately avoiding the obvious.

    Spins in aircraft can be very dangerous, yes...

    ...and that is why you fly in a manner to avoid them.

    Spins in a racing car are probably less dangerous...

    ...but if you race to win, you drive in a manner that makes
    spinning a somewhat regular occurrence.

    Last questions:

    How many hours do you have in total?

    How many unintentional spins have you had?

    Be honest... ...if that's possible for you.
    This all started out as you bragging about how proficient you are at
    driving a race car (and good for you),
    That's a lie.
    and I pointed out that we do
    that, and more, in 3 dimensions.
    With a huge amount more space between you and anything you can hit...

    ...and trying to stay as far away from the limit as you can pretty much
    all the time.
    You, being the person you are, felt
    compelled to denigrate that, making it sound pretty damn easy. Well,
    I didn't denigrate anything.
    it isn't. Furthermore, your races last a few minutes - my flights
    last many hours, and there are hours more of preparation.
    You think there aren't hours of preparation for a race, Sunshine?
    It can be
    physically grueling, yet you have to be at the top of your game the
    entire time.
    And driving a racing car can't be physically gruelling?
    I tell my golfing buddies that if I have a bad golf
    game, I just come back tomorrow and try again; but if I have a bad
    day flying I am dead. I recommend that, in the future, you be a bit
    more humble about the activities of others.
    Ummmm...

    ...no.

    In flying, just as in racing, there can be lots of "bad days" that don't >> come close to killing you.

    Liarboy Alan, you have bragged about what a great race driver you are many times in a different newsgroup.
    But I wasn't bragging in this thread, was I?

    And frankly, you find and post my biggest brag.

    I dare you, asshole.


    Just a question my dear man. I doubt you will respond, but I will put the question out there anyway?

    If someone goes to the bank, takes out a sum, and counts it on a Youtube video, could one not construe that as bragging?

    The silence will be deafening, we can count on that. Prove me wrong baby doll.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)