1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.GOLF

  • How STUPID can Nobel economists be?

    From TomS@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 12 18:20:38 2022
    PLENTY, as it turns out. They predicted that inflation will moderate, when, in reality, it took off to 40-year highs:
    https://www.epi.org/open-letter-from-nobel-laureates-in-support-of-economic-recovery-agenda/
    And that was without us spending additional trillions under Lyin' Biden's Build Back Broke plan. When you print A LOT of new money, the existing money becomes worth LESS.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bruce bowser@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 12 19:32:42 2022
    At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to bruce bowser on Fri May 13 19:15:01 2022
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri May 13 19:45:31 2022
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.

    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon May 16 22:20:26 2022
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon May 16 23:01:07 2022
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.

    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 17 21:49:51 2022
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:01:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.
    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    This thread is about lying Nobel laureates, Fool, not police.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Tue May 17 22:45:01 2022
    On 2022-05-17 9:49 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:01:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote:
    At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.
    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    This thread is about lying Nobel laureates, Fool, not police.

    You were happy enough with the subject change for the last couple of
    posts, Sunshine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed May 18 11:41:22 2022
    On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:45:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-17 9:49 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:01:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>> At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.
    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    This thread is about lying Nobel laureates, Fool, not police.
    You were happy enough with the subject change for the last couple of
    posts, Sunshine.

    No, Fool, it is YOU and Bowser Wowser who changed the subject, which is:
    How STUPID can Nobel economists be?
    The answer is PLENTY - they TOTALLY missed the boat on inflation and SHOULD apologize to everyone that was misled. But I am not holding my breath waiting for that to happen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed May 18 12:17:58 2022
    On 2022-05-18 11:41 a.m., TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:45:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-17 9:49 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:01:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>>>> At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.
    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    This thread is about lying Nobel laureates, Fool, not police.
    You were happy enough with the subject change for the last couple of
    posts, Sunshine.

    No, Fool, it is YOU and Bowser Wowser who changed the subject, which is:
    How STUPID can Nobel economists be?
    The answer is PLENTY - they TOTALLY missed the boat on inflation and SHOULD apologize to everyone that was misled. But I am not holding my breath waiting for that to happen.

    And you happily followed along with the change...

    ...until it got too tough.

    Your first reply:

    'They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they
    were asserting was false from the get-go.'

    But what they were asserting WASN'T false, was it?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat May 21 13:31:38 2022
    On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:18:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-18 11:41 a.m., TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:45:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-17 9:49 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:01:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>>>> At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.
    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    This thread is about lying Nobel laureates, Fool, not police.
    You were happy enough with the subject change for the last couple of
    posts, Sunshine.

    No, Fool, it is YOU and Bowser Wowser who changed the subject, which is: How STUPID can Nobel economists be?
    The answer is PLENTY - they TOTALLY missed the boat on inflation and SHOULD apologize to everyone that was misled. But I am not holding my breath waiting for that to happen.
    And you happily followed along with the change...

    ...until it got too tough.

    Your first reply:

    'They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they
    were asserting was false from the get-go.'

    But what they were asserting WASN'T false, was it?

    :-)

    Again, you are resorting to WHATABOUTISM and NOT answering the question - surprise, SURPRISE!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat May 21 13:39:37 2022
    On 2022-05-21 1:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:18:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-18 11:41 a.m., TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:45:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-17 9:49 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:01:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>>>>>> At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.
    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    This thread is about lying Nobel laureates, Fool, not police.
    You were happy enough with the subject change for the last couple of
    posts, Sunshine.

    No, Fool, it is YOU and Bowser Wowser who changed the subject, which is: >>> How STUPID can Nobel economists be?
    The answer is PLENTY - they TOTALLY missed the boat on inflation and SHOULD apologize to everyone that was misled. But I am not holding my breath waiting for that to happen.
    And you happily followed along with the change...

    ...until it got too tough.

    Your first reply:

    'They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they
    were asserting was false from the get-go.'

    But what they were asserting WASN'T false, was it?

    :-)

    Again, you are resorting to WHATABOUTISM and NOT answering the question - surprise, SURPRISE!

    The subject changed....

    ...you were fine with it...

    ...then you got called on the fact that you were wrong...

    ...then you objected to the subject change.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat May 21 21:14:45 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 1:39:40 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 1:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:18:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-18 11:41 a.m., TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:45:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-17 9:49 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:01:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>>>>>> At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.
    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    This thread is about lying Nobel laureates, Fool, not police.
    You were happy enough with the subject change for the last couple of >>>> posts, Sunshine.

    No, Fool, it is YOU and Bowser Wowser who changed the subject, which is: >>> How STUPID can Nobel economists be?
    The answer is PLENTY - they TOTALLY missed the boat on inflation and SHOULD apologize to everyone that was misled. But I am not holding my breath waiting for that to happen.
    And you happily followed along with the change...

    ...until it got too tough.

    Your first reply:

    'They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they
    were asserting was false from the get-go.'

    But what they were asserting WASN'T false, was it?

    :-)

    Again, you are resorting to WHATABOUTISM and NOT answering the question - surprise, SURPRISE!
    The subject changed....

    ...you were fine with it...

    ...then you got called on the fact that you were wrong...

    ...then you objected to the subject change.

    LOL! You present ZERO defense for those idiot laureates - their reputation is dropping faster than Shrillary's, and deservedly so!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat May 21 22:15:00 2022
    On 2022-05-21 9:14 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 1:39:40 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-21 1:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:18:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-18 11:41 a.m., TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:45:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-17 9:49 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:01:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.
    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    This thread is about lying Nobel laureates, Fool, not police.
    You were happy enough with the subject change for the last couple of >>>>>> posts, Sunshine.

    No, Fool, it is YOU and Bowser Wowser who changed the subject, which is: >>>>> How STUPID can Nobel economists be?
    The answer is PLENTY - they TOTALLY missed the boat on inflation and SHOULD apologize to everyone that was misled. But I am not holding my breath waiting for that to happen.
    And you happily followed along with the change...

    ...until it got too tough.

    Your first reply:

    'They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they >>>> were asserting was false from the get-go.'

    But what they were asserting WASN'T false, was it?

    :-)

    Again, you are resorting to WHATABOUTISM and NOT answering the question - surprise, SURPRISE!
    The subject changed....

    ...you were fine with it...

    ...then you got called on the fact that you were wrong...

    ...then you objected to the subject change.

    LOL! You present ZERO defense for those idiot laureates - their reputation is dropping faster than Shrillary's, and deservedly so!!

    I didn't enter the thread to defend them.

    I entered it after you accepted a switch in the subject.

    It was only when that made you look like the loser you always are that
    suddenly you started whining.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Elam@21:1/5 to TomS on Sun May 22 13:03:34 2022
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 9:20:39 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    PLENTY, as it turns out. They predicted that inflation will moderate, when, in reality, it took off to 40-year highs:
    https://www.epi.org/open-letter-from-nobel-laureates-in-support-of-economic-recovery-agenda/
    And that was without us spending additional trillions under Lyin' Biden's Build Back Broke plan. When you print A LOT of new money, the existing money becomes worth LESS.

    As an economist myself I don't get it either. General inflation is always about too much money changing too small a supply. Covid resulted in huge federal deficits funded by FED borrowing to cover the deficit (i.e. - printing money) and shrinking supply
    of goods and services. Inflation was inevitable, and is going to take some time to slow down.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to TomS on Sun May 22 13:24:24 2022
    On Saturday, May 21, 2022 at 4:31:39 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:18:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-18 11:41 a.m., TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:45:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-17 9:49 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 11:01:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-16 10:20 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-13 7:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 7:32:44 PM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>>>> At least they arent liars like you and look right at the phrase "and another police officer" and then deny they saw it.

    They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they were asserting was false from the get-go.
    What was asserted wasn't false.

    A COP was caught (past tense).

    You are SO far off topic you are PATHETIC.
    Nope.

    A police officer was caught.

    He was a police officer when he was breaking the law.

    This thread is about lying Nobel laureates, Fool, not police.
    You were happy enough with the subject change for the last couple of
    posts, Sunshine.

    No, Fool, it is YOU and Bowser Wowser who changed the subject, which is: How STUPID can Nobel economists be?
    The answer is PLENTY - they TOTALLY missed the boat on inflation and SHOULD apologize to everyone that was misled. But I am not holding my breath waiting for that to happen.
    And you happily followed along with the change...

    ...until it got too tough.

    Your first reply:

    'They aren't? How THE HELL do you KNOW that? I say they KNEW what they
    were asserting was false from the get-go.'

    But what they were asserting WASN'T false, was it?

    :-)
    Again, you are resorting to WHATABOUTISM and NOT answering the question - surprise, SURPRISE!

    Absolutely hilarious. These trolls here have you running in circles. Most entertaining. A twit trying to reason with twits.

    You keep coming back for more. Are you that bored Betty?

    You entertain so well. What a show you put on! Thank you Betty Boo!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)