1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.GOLF

  • Lyin' Biden cancels HUGE oil & gas lease, then LIES about why

    From TomS@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 12 14:46:22 2022
    A lackey for Lyin' Biden cited a "lack of interest" in canceling the sales, but everybody knows differently. The way to find out if there is any interest is to proceed with the sale and see how many companies bid.
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-alaska-oil-gas-lease-sale-canceled/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri May 13 04:50:52 2022
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 5:46:23 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    A lackey for Lyin' Biden cited a "lack of interest" in canceling the sales, but
    everybody knows differently. The way to find out if there is any interest is to
    proceed with the sale and see how many companies bid. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-alaska-oil-gas-lease-sale-canceled/

    When an Agency publishes a 'Sources Sought' in the CBD and no one responds
    to become a qualified certified bidder, there is no one interested by definition,
    which thus forms the justification to cancel the rest.

    FYI, it doesn't have to pedantically be zero: the minimum number (threshold) of qualified bidders is also determined during the package prep process (which is prior to CBD announcement), so the actual criteria is [responses < threshold].

    Given that Tommy claims to have run a small company that bid on Fed work,
    it is implausible that he would have been able to do that for a decade without ever experiencing any RFP's/IFB's being withdrawn by the Government.

    The dichotomy dilemma: did Tommy merely forget (eg, senility), or is it that he's been lying all along about having such an enterprise (eg, fiction)?


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri May 13 16:46:46 2022
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 4:50:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 5:46:23 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    A lackey for Lyin' Biden cited a "lack of interest" in canceling the sales, but
    everybody knows differently. The way to find out if there is any interest is to
    proceed with the sale and see how many companies bid. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-alaska-oil-gas-lease-sale-canceled/
    When an Agency publishes a 'Sources Sought' in the CBD and no one responds to become a qualified certified bidder, there is no one interested by definition,
    which thus forms the justification to cancel the rest.

    FYI, it doesn't have to pedantically be zero: the minimum number (threshold) of qualified bidders is also determined during the package prep process (which
    is prior to CBD announcement), so the actual criteria is [responses < threshold].

    Given that Tommy claims to have run a small company that bid on Fed work,
    it is implausible that he would have been able to do that for a decade without
    ever experiencing any RFP's/IFB's being withdrawn by the Government.

    The dichotomy dilemma: did Tommy merely forget (eg, senility), or is it that he's been lying all along about having such an enterprise (eg, fiction)?


    -hh

    Thanks for the explanation. Another explanation is that companies didn't bid because they know they can't get permits to operate issued by Lyin' Biden's incompetent government that is actively trying to shut down ALL oil and gas exploration. Having a
    lease is MEANINGLESS if you can't get the permits to drill. Remember, I asked you libtards what the difference was between a lease and a permit and NEVER got an intelligent response.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri May 13 17:15:43 2022
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:46:47 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 4:50:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 5:46:23 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    A lackey for Lyin' Biden cited a "lack of interest" in canceling the sales, but
    everybody knows differently. The way to find out if there is any interest is to
    proceed with the sale and see how many companies bid. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-alaska-oil-gas-lease-sale-canceled/
    When an Agency publishes a 'Sources Sought' in the CBD and no one responds to become a qualified certified bidder, there is no one interested by definition,
    which thus forms the justification to cancel the rest.

    FYI, it doesn't have to pedantically be zero: the minimum number (threshold)
    of qualified bidders is also determined during the package prep process (which
    is prior to CBD announcement), so the actual criteria is [responses < threshold].

    Given that Tommy claims to have run a small company that bid on Fed work, it is implausible that he would have been able to do that for a decade without
    ever experiencing any RFP's/IFB's being withdrawn by the Government.

    The dichotomy dilemma: did Tommy merely forget (eg, senility), or is it that
    he's been lying all along about having such an enterprise (eg, fiction)?


    -hh
    Thanks for the explanation.

    Which means your claim was wrong; so noted.

    Another explanation is that companies didn't bid because they know they can't get permits to operate issued by Lyin' Biden's incompetent government that is actively trying to shut down ALL oil and gas exploration.
    Having a lease is MEANINGLESS if you can't get the permits to drill.

    In theory…but what percentage of permit applications actually get rejected?

    Remember, I asked you libtards what the difference was between a lease
    and a permit and NEVER got an intelligent response.

    Sorry, I don’t recall that; got cite? Because the difference looks pretty clear:

    < https://www.resolve.ngo/site-communityhealthguidebook/stage-2-leasing-permitting.htm>

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri May 13 19:23:18 2022
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 5:15:44 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:46:47 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 4:50:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 5:46:23 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    A lackey for Lyin' Biden cited a "lack of interest" in canceling the sales, but
    everybody knows differently. The way to find out if there is any interest is to
    proceed with the sale and see how many companies bid. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-alaska-oil-gas-lease-sale-canceled/
    When an Agency publishes a 'Sources Sought' in the CBD and no one responds
    to become a qualified certified bidder, there is no one interested by definition,
    which thus forms the justification to cancel the rest.

    FYI, it doesn't have to pedantically be zero: the minimum number (threshold)
    of qualified bidders is also determined during the package prep process (which
    is prior to CBD announcement), so the actual criteria is [responses < threshold].

    Given that Tommy claims to have run a small company that bid on Fed work,
    it is implausible that he would have been able to do that for a decade without
    ever experiencing any RFP's/IFB's being withdrawn by the Government.

    The dichotomy dilemma: did Tommy merely forget (eg, senility), or is it that
    he's been lying all along about having such an enterprise (eg, fiction)?


    -hh
    Thanks for the explanation.
    Which means your claim was wrong; so noted.

    No, you NEVER produced evidence to support your claim.

    Another explanation is that companies didn't bid because they know they can't get permits to operate issued by Lyin' Biden's incompetent government
    that is actively trying to shut down ALL oil and gas exploration.
    Having a lease is MEANINGLESS if you can't get the permits to drill.
    In theory…but what percentage of permit applications actually get rejected?

    Hey Lyin' Asshole, they don't get rejected - they just take forever to be processed.

    Remember, I asked you libtards what the difference was between a lease
    and a permit and NEVER got an intelligent response.
    Sorry, I don’t recall that; got cite? Because the difference looks pretty clear:

    I think you are smart enough to locate it yourself.


    < https://www.resolve.ngo/site-communityhealthguidebook/stage-2-leasing-permitting.htm>

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri May 13 19:47:16 2022
    On 2022-05-13 7:23 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 5:15:44 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:46:47 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 4:50:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 5:46:23 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    A lackey for Lyin' Biden cited a "lack of interest" in canceling the sales, but
    everybody knows differently. The way to find out if there is any interest is to
    proceed with the sale and see how many companies bid.
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-alaska-oil-gas-lease-sale-canceled/ >>>> When an Agency publishes a 'Sources Sought' in the CBD and no one responds >>>> to become a qualified certified bidder, there is no one interested by definition,
    which thus forms the justification to cancel the rest.

    FYI, it doesn't have to pedantically be zero: the minimum number (threshold)
    of qualified bidders is also determined during the package prep process (which
    is prior to CBD announcement), so the actual criteria is [responses < threshold].

    Given that Tommy claims to have run a small company that bid on Fed work, >>>> it is implausible that he would have been able to do that for a decade without
    ever experiencing any RFP's/IFB's being withdrawn by the Government.

    The dichotomy dilemma: did Tommy merely forget (eg, senility), or is it that
    he's been lying all along about having such an enterprise (eg, fiction)? >>>>

    -hh
    Thanks for the explanation.
    Which means your claim was wrong; so noted.

    No, you NEVER produced evidence to support your claim.

    You know how to use Google...

    ...so YOU produce the evidence.

    At least, that's the standard you use when you make a claim.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat May 14 04:43:30 2022
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 10:23:19 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 5:15:44 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 7:46:47 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 4:50:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 5:46:23 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    A lackey for Lyin' Biden cited a "lack of interest" in canceling the sales, but
    everybody knows differently. The way to find out if there is any interest is to
    proceed with the sale and see how many companies bid. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-alaska-oil-gas-lease-sale-canceled/
    When an Agency publishes a 'Sources Sought' in the CBD and no one responds
    to become a qualified certified bidder, there is no one interested by definition,
    which thus forms the justification to cancel the rest.

    FYI, it doesn't have to pedantically be zero: the minimum number (threshold)
    of qualified bidders is also determined during the package prep process (which
    is prior to CBD announcement), so the actual criteria is [responses < threshold].

    Given that Tommy claims to have run a small company that bid on Fed work,
    it is implausible that he would have been able to do that for a decade without
    ever experiencing any RFP's/IFB's being withdrawn by the Government.

    The dichotomy dilemma: did Tommy merely forget (eg, senility), or is it that
    he's been lying all along about having such an enterprise (eg, fiction)?


    -hh
    Thanks for the explanation.

    Which means your claim was wrong; so noted.

    No, you NEVER produced evidence to support your claim.

    Bullshit. You got the relevant executive summary of the FAR. If that’s not good enough for you, then go read the entire FAR and get back to us with questions. Given the length of it, you’ll be busy for the next 3-4 months.

    Another explanation is that companies didn't bid because they know they can't get permits to operate issued by Lyin' Biden's incompetent government
    that is actively trying to shut down ALL oil and gas exploration.
    Having a lease is MEANINGLESS if you can't get the permits to drill.
    In theory…but what percentage of permit applications actually get rejected?

    Hey Lyin' Asshole, they don't get rejected - they just take forever to be processed.

    Because the permit process is more than merely Fed, and various laws require certain documentation to be prepared which arent able to be produced overnight. Case in point, one of your salmon lifecycle studies: it takes more than 5 minutes
    of collection data, right?


    Remember, I asked you libtards what the difference was between a lease and a permit and NEVER got an intelligent response.

    Sorry, I don’t recall that; got cite? Because the difference looks pretty clear:
    < https://www.resolve.ngo/site-communityhealthguidebook/stage-2-leasing-permitting.htm>

    I think you are smart enough to locate it yourself.

    If it exists, which is what I doubt. Since I’m not who made the claim, it’s your burden of proof.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)