1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.GOLF

  • Lyin' Biden is having a hard time reconciling hate speech and pro-abort

    From TomS@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 9 17:58:31 2022
    Dims are BIG on condemning hate speech when its against their constituents, but encourage it against the Supreme Court.
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3482320-abortion-battle-moves-to-homes-of-supreme-court-justices/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon May 9 20:17:55 2022
    On 2022-05-09 5:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
    Dims are BIG on condemning hate speech when its against their constituents, but encourage it against the Supreme Court.
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3482320-abortion-battle-moves-to-homes-of-supreme-court-justices/

    Where was that alleged "encouragement", Sunshine?

    Quote it.

    As for Biden:

    'The White House said earlier on Monday that demonstrations should never include "violence, threats or vandalism".

    "[President Biden] strongly believes in the constitutional right to
    protest," said a statement from his press secretary Jen Psaki.
    "But that should never include violence, threats, or vandalism. Judges
    perform an incredibly important function in our society, and they must
    be able to do their jobs without concern for their personal safety."'

    So the "lyin'" going on...

    ...seems to be yours.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue May 10 23:07:43 2022
    On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 8:17:57 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-09 5:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
    Dims are BIG on condemning hate speech when its against their constituents, but encourage it against the Supreme Court.
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3482320-abortion-battle-moves-to-homes-of-supreme-court-justices/
    Where was that alleged "encouragement", Sunshine?

    Quote it.

    As for Biden:

    'The White House said earlier on Monday that demonstrations should never include "violence, threats or vandalism".

    "[President Biden] strongly believes in the constitutional right to
    protest," said a statement from his press secretary Jen Psaki.
    "But that should never include violence, threats, or vandalism. Judges perform an incredibly important function in our society, and they must
    be able to do their jobs without concern for their personal safety."'

    So the "lyin'" going on...

    ...seems to be yours.

    :-)

    Oh, NOW you know what Lyin' Biden said, you fucker. Do you ALSO know what he is telling these dummies to do is in DIRECT violation of Federal law 18 USC 1507? Lyin' Biden is guilty of instigating unlawful behavior.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed May 11 06:07:35 2022
    On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 2:07:45 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 8:17:57 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-09 5:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
    Dims are BIG on condemning hate speech when its against their constituents, but encourage it against the Supreme Court.
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3482320-abortion-battle-moves-to-homes-of-supreme-court-justices/
    Where was that alleged "encouragement", Sunshine?

    Quote it.

    As for Biden:

    'The White House said earlier on Monday that demonstrations should never include "violence, threats or vandalism".

    "[President Biden] strongly believes in the constitutional right to protest," said a statement from his press secretary Jen Psaki.
    "But that should never include violence, threats, or vandalism. Judges perform an incredibly important function in our society, and they must
    be able to do their jobs without concern for their personal safety."'

    So the "lyin'" going on...

    ...seems to be yours.

    :-)
    Oh, NOW you know what Lyin' Biden said, you fucker. Do you ALSO know what he is telling these dummies to do is in DIRECT violation of Federal law 18 USC 1507? Lyin' Biden is guilty of instigating unlawful behavior.

    You know what gets said about unequal application of the law ... right? /s


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed May 11 08:52:08 2022
    On 2022-05-10 11:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 8:17:57 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-09 5:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
    Dims are BIG on condemning hate speech when its against their
    constituents, but encourage it against the Supreme Court.
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3482320-abortion-battle-moves-to-homes-of-supreme-court-justices/


    Where was that alleged "encouragement", Sunshine?

    Quote it.

    As for Biden:

    'The White House said earlier on Monday that demonstrations should
    never include "violence, threats or vandalism".

    "[President Biden] strongly believes in the constitutional right
    to protest," said a statement from his press secretary Jen Psaki.
    "But that should never include violence, threats, or vandalism.
    Judges perform an incredibly important function in our society, and
    they must be able to do their jobs without concern for their
    personal safety."'

    So the "lyin'" going on...

    ...seems to be yours.

    :-)

    Oh, NOW you know what Lyin' Biden said, you fucker. Do you ALSO know
    what he is telling these dummies to do is in DIRECT violation of
    Federal law 18 USC 1507? Lyin' Biden is guilty of instigating
    unlawful behavior.


    1. It was right in the article you provide.

    2. It directly contradicts your claim.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu May 12 14:58:08 2022
    On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 8:52:11 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-10 11:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 8:17:57 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-09 5:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
    Dims are BIG on condemning hate speech when its against their
    constituents, but encourage it against the Supreme Court.
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3482320-abortion-battle-moves-to-homes-of-supreme-court-justices/


    Where was that alleged "encouragement", Sunshine?

    Quote it.

    As for Biden:

    'The White House said earlier on Monday that demonstrations should
    never include "violence, threats or vandalism".

    "[President Biden] strongly believes in the constitutional right
    to protest," said a statement from his press secretary Jen Psaki.
    "But that should never include violence, threats, or vandalism.
    Judges perform an incredibly important function in our society, and
    they must be able to do their jobs without concern for their
    personal safety."'

    So the "lyin'" going on...

    ...seems to be yours.

    :-)

    Oh, NOW you know what Lyin' Biden said, you fucker. Do you ALSO know
    what he is telling these dummies to do is in DIRECT violation of
    Federal law 18 USC 1507? Lyin' Biden is guilty of instigating
    unlawful behavior.
    1. It was right in the article you provide.

    2. It directly contradicts your claim.

    Lyin' Biden has since gone from encouraging law breaking to directly supporting it:
    https://nypost.com/2022/05/10/psaki-defends-peaceful-abortion-rallies-at-justices-homes/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu May 12 15:18:01 2022
    On 2022-05-12 2:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 8:52:11 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-10 11:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 8:17:57 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-09 5:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
    Dims are BIG on condemning hate speech when its against their
    constituents, but encourage it against the Supreme Court.
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3482320-abortion-battle-moves-to-homes-of-supreme-court-justices/


    Where was that alleged "encouragement", Sunshine?

    Quote it.

    As for Biden:

    'The White House said earlier on Monday that demonstrations should
    never include "violence, threats or vandalism".

    "[President Biden] strongly believes in the constitutional right
    to protest," said a statement from his press secretary Jen Psaki.
    "But that should never include violence, threats, or vandalism.
    Judges perform an incredibly important function in our society, and
    they must be able to do their jobs without concern for their
    personal safety."'

    So the "lyin'" going on...

    ...seems to be yours.

    :-)

    Oh, NOW you know what Lyin' Biden said, you fucker. Do you ALSO know
    what he is telling these dummies to do is in DIRECT violation of
    Federal law 18 USC 1507? Lyin' Biden is guilty of instigating
    unlawful behavior.
    1. It was right in the article you provide.

    2. It directly contradicts your claim.

    Lyin' Biden has since gone from encouraging law breaking to directly supporting it:
    https://nypost.com/2022/05/10/psaki-defends-peaceful-abortion-rallies-at-justices-homes/

    Sorry, but how is a peaceful protest "breaking the law"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri May 13 10:51:03 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 8:52:11 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-10 11:07 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 8:17:57 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-05-09 5:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
    Dims are BIG on condemning hate speech when its against their
    constituents, but encourage it against the Supreme Court.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3482320-abortion-battle -moves-to-homes-of-supreme-court-justices/ >> >>>
    Where was that alleged "encouragement", Sunshine?

    Quote it.

    As for Biden:

    'The White House said earlier on Monday that demonstrations
    should >> never include "violence, threats or vandalism".

    "[President Biden] strongly believes in the constitutional right
    to protest," said a statement from his press secretary Jen
    Psaki. >> "But that should never include violence, threats, or
    vandalism. >> Judges perform an incredibly important function in
    our society, and >> they must be able to do their jobs without
    concern for their >> personal safety."'

    So the "lyin'" going on...

    ...seems to be yours.

    :-)

    Oh, NOW you know what Lyin' Biden said, you fucker. Do you ALSO
    know what he is telling these dummies to do is in DIRECT
    violation of Federal law 18 USC 1507? Lyin' Biden is guilty of instigating unlawful behavior.
    1. It was right in the article you provide.

    2. It directly contradicts your claim.

    Lyin' Biden has since gone from encouraging law breaking to directly supporting it:

    https://nypost.com/2022/05/10/psaki-defends-peaceful-abortion-rallies-at-justices-homes/

    Pep, that doesn't seem right old girl. I am glad you admit trying to
    intimidate lawmakers should not be allowed or encouraged.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Amos P (transgender nymshifter)
    Jerry C. (same attention seeking nymshifter)
    Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
    Felicity (transgender nymshifter)
    George R (transgender nymshifter)
    Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)