On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck", or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?...
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT! Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT! Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
-hh
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT! Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
-hh
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton, whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative. As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton, whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriouslyAnd does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still* simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
-hh
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still* simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
-hhHey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean,
as we had found First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it
didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which
type of blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
-hh wrote:
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean,
as we had found First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it
didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
Walton's Mango Manor.
Bigbird wrote:
-hh wrote:
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean,
as we had found First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it
didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
Walton's Mango Manor.
<shorturl.at/apRV5>
Bigbird wrote:
-hh wrote:
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean,
as we had found First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it
didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
Walton's Mango Manor.
<shorturl.at/apRV5>
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDSNot in advance you didn't.
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
-hh
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 3:23:49 AM UTC-8, Bigbird wrote:
Bigbird wrote:
-hh wrote:
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
Walton's Mango Manor.
<shorturl.at/apRV5>
Note that the Lyin' Asshole NEVER said how much he made off of ARNA!!!!
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.
Note that the Lyin' Asshole NEVER said how much he made off of
ARNA!!!!
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as
well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.
Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
I doubt he covered his fees on both ends; given his readiness to be dishonest
I doubt he made any gain at all.
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:01:14 PM UTC+1, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as
well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance (or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.
Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
Damn jet lag. Looks like it was Sept 2019 and CVX:
“ Very small if at all: yesterday’s high was only 124.18 and that happened in
the last 20 minutes of the Market’s hours. That makes your theoretical max only 124.18/124 = a +0.145% gain ... before trading costs. “
and:
“i was merely noting that his claim wasn’t literally impossible.
And from even the literary best case, his maximum gain potential
of ~$27 ($26.10, actually) from $25K wasn’t anything to crow about.
I doubt he covered his fees on both ends; given his readiness to be dishonest
I doubt he made any gain at all.
Fidelity’s published fee is US$4.95 per fee. Times two trades is $9.90. This
means that Tom’s theoretical max gain on his claim was actually $26.10, which
is less than the $27 that I said “less than” on. I didn’t round the trade fees off
to $10 this time, but I will do so in the future. ”
Oh, and Tommy’s ALXN was mentioned in that thread too.
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/9A3D2vUgI7s/m/A_zdeUs2AwAJ>
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 3:23:49 AM UTC-8, Bigbird wrote:
Bigbird wrote:
-hh wrote:
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean,
as we had found First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it
didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
Walton's Mango Manor.
<shorturl.at/apRV5>Note that the Lyin' Asshole NEVER said how much he made off of ARNA!!!!
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 2:15:08 AM UTC+1, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:01:14 PM UTC+1, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound? FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance (or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.
Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
Damn jet lag. Looks like it was Sept 2019 and CVX:
“ Very small if at all: yesterday’s high was only 124.18 and that happened in
the last 20 minutes of the Market’s hours. That makes your theoretical max
only 124.18/124 = a +0.145% gain ... before trading costs. “
and:
“i was merely noting that his claim wasn’t literally impossible.
And from even the literary best case, his maximum gain potential
of ~$27 ($26.10, actually) from $25K wasn’t anything to crow about.
I doubt he covered his fees on both ends; given his readiness to be dishonest
I doubt he made any gain at all.
Fidelity’s published fee is US$4.95 per fee. Times two trades is $9.90. This
means that Tom’s theoretical max gain on his claim was actually $26.10, which
is less than the $27 that I said “less than” on. I didn’t round the trade fees off
to $10 this time, but I will do so in the future. ”
Oh, and Tommy’s ALXN was mentioned in that thread too.
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/9A3D2vUgI7s/m/A_zdeUs2AwAJ>Missed one other one on CVX:
“Similarly, to have made a $1,000+ gain would have required
5611+ shares, requiring no less than ~$673,325 in capital.”
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/9A3D2vUgI7s/m/XfGNsaS_AQAJ>
Backing that out to just the “$250K” claim Tommy makes above, that amount invested in CVX in this past trade would have returned roughly
all of a +$370 gain (+0.15%) on his speculative gamble…and a much
bigger loss if he had waited one more day that week before bailing out.
Plus the irony is that CVX is since up for investors: $183 (+27%)
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as
well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as
well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance (or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act on
the advice.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ (which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.
The stocks of the companies listed below ballooned as much as FOUR HUNDRED PERCENT from their IPO price, only to tank:maker Romeo Power Inc. (RMO) said it expected that revenue for the year would be no more than $40 million. That is far shy of the $140 million projected when it raised hundreds of millions of dollars from investors last year.
EV Companies Went Public With Big Plans. They're Quickly Hitting Snags.
BY Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
— 8:10 AM ET 04/02/2021
Over the past year, the stock market has been deluged with newly public electric-vehicle startups that raised money by pitching plans for rapid growth.
Months into their lives on the public markets, a set of these companies are missing targets, adding costs and, in one case, upending major parts of a business model.
On Monday, aspiring electric car and truck maker Canoo Inc. (GOEV) told investors it was abandoning or scaling back numerous key aspects of the strategy laid out when it raised $630 million last year. On Tuesday, five-year-old electric- vehicle battery
Lordstown Motors Corp. (RIDE) disclosed in mid-March that its capital expenses through the end of 2022 would be more than double the amount projected last year when the electric-pickup-truck startup raised $780 million from investors.investors it expected 2021 revenue to more than triple to $75 million; its first-quarter revenue is expected to be $1 million, flat from the year before.
A fourth, electric-vehicle company XL Fleet Corp. (XL), said Wednesday it was facing problems because of the "ongoing impacts" of Covid-19 on the truck market and wouldn't provide formal guidance about its 2021 revenue. The company previously told
All four companies characterized the challenges as surmountable and told investors they still expect robust demand and growth in years to come. Investors were less sanguine: The stocks of all four companies fell on the developments, ranging from a 12%drop for XL Fleet (XL) to a 21% decline for Canoo (GOEV) the day after the announcements.
The revelations so soon after the companies' listings illustrate that quickly building new auto giants from scratch can be more challenging than many of the companies had projected. All four announced the struggles on their first quarterly conferencecalls as public companies.
Just months earlier, the companies outlined their plans for rapid growth to investors in slideshow presentations that all featured charts showing fast-rising revenue and profits.pivot already, what's going to happen in three years or five years?" he asked, noting there would then be far more competition from traditional auto makers.
"These companies are finding it is harder to actually take that PowerPoint slide and get a product out of it than was envisioned," said Jon Lopez, an analyst at investment bank Vertical Group who follows the sector. "If you're having to reposition or
Ever since Tesla Inc.'s stock took off mid-last year, the electric-vehicle space has been a searing hot sector, as investors have hunted for companies they hope to replicate the electric-car pioneer's stock-market success.bring those companies onto the stock market.
Backers believe a rapid pivot to electric cars should open the door for new brands.
While there has been a pullback in share prices in recent weeks, the trend was aided by a boom of special-purpose acquisition companies. A SPAC is a Wall Street tool that allows companies with no assets beyond cash to merge with private companies and
At least 22 electric vehicle and battery companies have struck deals to go public through SPACs in the past year, raising more than $17 billion from investors, according to data from Baris Guzel, a principal at BMW i Ventures, a venture capitalinvestor funded by BMW AG. That group includes several companies that have yet to complete their mergers, including Lucid Motors Inc. and Faraday Future.
Helping fuel the SPAC boom is a practice that allows startups to publicly disclose revenue and profit projections - - strongly discouraged by regulations in the traditional route of going public but allowed in SPACs.supplier shortages and wanted to accelerate production, which is scheduled to begin in September.
These projections have helped the young electric-vehicle companies achieve multibillion-dollar valuations, even before many of them have generated any revenue.
Ohio-based Lordstown went public in a merger with a SPAC in October, pledging that it would be able to make a new pickup truck faster and cheaper than is standard because it had acquired a former General Motors Co. car factory at a low price.
Last month Lordstown told investors the costs would be higher than initially expected and said it would spend at least $300 million on capital expenses between 2020 and 2021, up from the $135 million initially forecast. The company said it faced some
Lordstown also said then that the Securities and Exchange Commission had opened an inquiry relating to preorders of its vehicles. The statement came soon after a short seller, Hindenburg Research, issued a report that alleged that Lordstown misledinvestors about the strength of its truck preorders, among other criticisms.
Lordstown told investors last month that it was cooperating with the SEC inquiry. CEO Steve Burns has previously denied that the company misrepresented its preorder book and said the short seller's report contained half-truths and lies. The companydeclined to comment for this article.
Canoo (GOEV) went public soon after Lordstown in a December SPAC merger. The four-year-old company based in Los Angeles pitched itself to investors last year by highlighting its business plan of not only developing cars but selling parts andengineering services to other auto makers. Canoo (GOEV) boasted to investors of its "innovative subscription business model" in which it would lease vehicles directly to consumers a month at a time. Canoo (GOEV) told investors a deal to jointly build car
On Monday, Canoo's (GOEV) executive chairman, Tony Aquila, announced strategic shifts on a conference call that included awkward exchanges with analysts, including one in which he was asked whether Ulrich Kranz was still the chief executive officer. Mr.Aquila said Mr. Kranz, who wasn't on the call, was "still currently the CEO." The company's CFO and its head of corporate strategy, both of whom helped market the company to investors last year, recently departed.
Mr. Aquila said the subscription model would be less than 20% of the company's business, given the high costs of building and owning so many cars itself. Canoo (GOEV) intends to move away from its plan to engineer car components for other companies, hesaid, as the practice "is just really not going to drive the best shareholder value."
Finally, Mr. Aquila said Canoo (GOEV) now plans eventually to make its own factories. That emphasis reflects a departure from its prior approach, which the company called an "asset-light, flexible manufacturing strategy" that relied on third-partymanufacturers.
Mr. Aquila joined the company in his role in October, well after the earlier business plan had been created. "I wasn't here when they did the original model," he told analysts Monday. He added that he "wanted to get ahead of this and explain to you howthis really is going to work."
On Saturday, April 3, 2021 at 1:27:34 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:battery maker Romeo Power Inc. (RMO) said it expected that revenue for the year would be no more than $40 million. That is far shy of the $140 million projected when it raised hundreds of millions of dollars from investors last year.
The stocks of the companies listed below ballooned as much as FOUR HUNDRED PERCENT from their IPO price, only to tank:
EV Companies Went Public With Big Plans. They're Quickly Hitting Snags.
BY Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
— 8:10 AM ET 04/02/2021
Over the past year, the stock market has been deluged with newly public electric-vehicle startups that raised money by pitching plans for rapid growth.
Months into their lives on the public markets, a set of these companies are missing targets, adding costs and, in one case, upending major parts of a business model.
On Monday, aspiring electric car and truck maker Canoo Inc. (GOEV) told investors it was abandoning or scaling back numerous key aspects of the strategy laid out when it raised $630 million last year. On Tuesday, five-year-old electric- vehicle
investors it expected 2021 revenue to more than triple to $75 million; its first-quarter revenue is expected to be $1 million, flat from the year before.
Lordstown Motors Corp. (RIDE) disclosed in mid-March that its capital expenses through the end of 2022 would be more than double the amount projected last year when the electric-pickup-truck startup raised $780 million from investors.
A fourth, electric-vehicle company XL Fleet Corp. (XL), said Wednesday it was facing problems because of the "ongoing impacts" of Covid-19 on the truck market and wouldn't provide formal guidance about its 2021 revenue. The company previously told
drop for XL Fleet (XL) to a 21% decline for Canoo (GOEV) the day after the announcements.
All four companies characterized the challenges as surmountable and told investors they still expect robust demand and growth in years to come. Investors were less sanguine: The stocks of all four companies fell on the developments, ranging from a 12%
calls as public companies.
The revelations so soon after the companies' listings illustrate that quickly building new auto giants from scratch can be more challenging than many of the companies had projected. All four announced the struggles on their first quarterly conference
pivot already, what's going to happen in three years or five years?" he asked, noting there would then be far more competition from traditional auto makers.
Just months earlier, the companies outlined their plans for rapid growth to investors in slideshow presentations that all featured charts showing fast-rising revenue and profits.
"These companies are finding it is harder to actually take that PowerPoint slide and get a product out of it than was envisioned," said Jon Lopez, an analyst at investment bank Vertical Group who follows the sector. "If you're having to reposition or
bring those companies onto the stock market.
Ever since Tesla Inc.'s stock took off mid-last year, the electric-vehicle space has been a searing hot sector, as investors have hunted for companies they hope to replicate the electric-car pioneer's stock-market success.
Backers believe a rapid pivot to electric cars should open the door for new brands.
While there has been a pullback in share prices in recent weeks, the trend was aided by a boom of special-purpose acquisition companies. A SPAC is a Wall Street tool that allows companies with no assets beyond cash to merge with private companies and
investor funded by BMW AG. That group includes several companies that have yet to complete their mergers, including Lucid Motors Inc. and Faraday Future.
At least 22 electric vehicle and battery companies have struck deals to go public through SPACs in the past year, raising more than $17 billion from investors, according to data from Baris Guzel, a principal at BMW i Ventures, a venture capital
supplier shortages and wanted to accelerate production, which is scheduled to begin in September.
Helping fuel the SPAC boom is a practice that allows startups to publicly disclose revenue and profit projections - - strongly discouraged by regulations in the traditional route of going public but allowed in SPACs.
These projections have helped the young electric-vehicle companies achieve multibillion-dollar valuations, even before many of them have generated any revenue.
Ohio-based Lordstown went public in a merger with a SPAC in October, pledging that it would be able to make a new pickup truck faster and cheaper than is standard because it had acquired a former General Motors Co. car factory at a low price.
Last month Lordstown told investors the costs would be higher than initially expected and said it would spend at least $300 million on capital expenses between 2020 and 2021, up from the $135 million initially forecast. The company said it faced some
investors about the strength of its truck preorders, among other criticisms.
Lordstown also said then that the Securities and Exchange Commission had opened an inquiry relating to preorders of its vehicles. The statement came soon after a short seller, Hindenburg Research, issued a report that alleged that Lordstown misled
declined to comment for this article.
Lordstown told investors last month that it was cooperating with the SEC inquiry. CEO Steve Burns has previously denied that the company misrepresented its preorder book and said the short seller's report contained half-truths and lies. The company
engineering services to other auto makers. Canoo (GOEV) boasted to investors of its "innovative subscription business model" in which it would lease vehicles directly to consumers a month at a time. Canoo (GOEV) told investors a deal to jointly build car
Canoo (GOEV) went public soon after Lordstown in a December SPAC merger. The four-year-old company based in Los Angeles pitched itself to investors last year by highlighting its business plan of not only developing cars but selling parts and
Mr. Aquila said Mr. Kranz, who wasn't on the call, was "still currently the CEO." The company's CFO and its head of corporate strategy, both of whom helped market the company to investors last year, recently departed.
On Monday, Canoo's (GOEV) executive chairman, Tony Aquila, announced strategic shifts on a conference call that included awkward exchanges with analysts, including one in which he was asked whether Ulrich Kranz was still the chief executive officer.
he said, as the practice "is just really not going to drive the best shareholder value."
Mr. Aquila said the subscription model would be less than 20% of the company's business, given the high costs of building and owning so many cars itself. Canoo (GOEV) intends to move away from its plan to engineer car components for other companies,
manufacturers.
Finally, Mr. Aquila said Canoo (GOEV) now plans eventually to make its own factories. That emphasis reflects a departure from its prior approach, which the company called an "asset-light, flexible manufacturing strategy" that relied on third-party
how this really is going to work."
Mr. Aquila joined the company in his role in October, well after the earlier business plan had been created. "I wasn't here when they did the original model," he told analysts Monday. He added that he "wanted to get ahead of this and explain to you
Looks like this has been fun with the usual suspects.
Want an EV? Forget the hours and days it takes to recharge. These $100K Rivian junkers are all being recalled.
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 3:27:04 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound? FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance (or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act onMy, my, what a load of revisionism.
the advice.
No, you were selling the hype in broad hand sweeps. it wasn’t until you got
called on it that you tried to show contemporary specifics…but that’s where
you struggled as your brags failed to perform (see $26.10) & you gave up.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ (which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.No, you showed cherry-picked “what if”s, based on the past performance and
with also with shortsighted momentum trading; IIRC, you’ve never shown any trades that were planned & expressed as LTCG from their outset. That’s why I noted you were gambling, not investing. Similarly, you chose these investment
points, as I’d never stated for how long I’d owned ARNA. Suffice to say it was
well before I’d mentioned it. That’s why I dropped multi-year timeframe clues.
Oh, and it paid off too, fortunately (some of my speculations haven’t, of course).
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.Keeping in mind how much of that inflation was due to Biden stimulus spending & QE during CoVid in 2020. /s Meantime, any TQQQ that you
still held in Dec 2021 is now worth 25%.
And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?
-hh
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 8:17:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 3:27:04 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound? FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act on
the advice.
My, my, what a load of revisionism.
No, you were selling the hype in broad hand sweeps. it wasn’t until you got
called on it that you tried to show contemporary specifics…but that’s where
you struggled as your brags failed to perform (see $26.10) & you gave up.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ (which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.
No, you showed cherry-picked “what if”s, based on the past performance and
with also with shortsighted momentum trading; IIRC, you’ve never shown any
trades that were planned & expressed as LTCG from their outset. That’s why
I noted you were gambling, not investing. Similarly, you chose these investment
points, as I’d never stated for how long I’d owned ARNA. Suffice to say it was
well before I’d mentioned it. That’s why I dropped multi-year timeframe clues.
Oh, and it paid off too, fortunately (some of my speculations haven’t, of course).
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.
Keeping in mind how much of that inflation was due to Biden stimulus spending & QE during CoVid in 2020. /s Meantime, any TQQQ that you
still held in Dec 2021 is now worth 25%.
And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 8:29:10 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 8:17:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 3:27:04 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else... On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound? FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately
after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act on
the advice.
My, my, what a load of revisionism.
No, you were selling the hype in broad hand sweeps. it wasn’t until you got
called on it that you tried to show contemporary specifics…but that’s where
you struggled as your brags failed to perform (see $26.10) & you gave up.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ
(which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was
bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.
No, you showed cherry-picked “what if”s, based on the past performance and
with also with shortsighted momentum trading; IIRC, you’ve never shown any
trades that were planned & expressed as LTCG from their outset. That’s why
I noted you were gambling, not investing. Similarly, you chose these investment
points, as I’d never stated for how long I’d owned ARNA. Suffice to say it was
well before I’d mentioned it. That’s why I dropped multi-year timeframe clues.
Oh, and it paid off too, fortunately (some of my speculations haven’t, of course).
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.
Keeping in mind how much of that inflation was due to Biden stimulus spending & QE during CoVid in 2020. /s Meantime, any TQQQ that you
still held in Dec 2021 is now worth 25%.
And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.
And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 8:29:10 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 8:17:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 3:27:04 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else... On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound? FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately
after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act on
the advice.
My, my, what a load of revisionism.
No, you were selling the hype in broad hand sweeps. it wasn’t until you got
called on it that you tried to show contemporary specifics…but that’s where
you struggled as your brags failed to perform (see $26.10) & you gave up.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ
(which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was
bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.
No, you showed cherry-picked “what if”s, based on the past performance and
with also with shortsighted momentum trading; IIRC, you’ve never shown any
trades that were planned & expressed as LTCG from their outset. That’s why
I noted you were gambling, not investing. Similarly, you chose these investment
points, as I’d never stated for how long I’d owned ARNA. Suffice to say it was
well before I’d mentioned it. That’s why I dropped multi-year timeframe clues.
Oh, and it paid off too, fortunately (some of my speculations haven’t, of course).
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.
Keeping in mind how much of that inflation was due to Biden stimulus spending & QE during CoVid in 2020. /s Meantime, any TQQQ that you
still held in Dec 2021 is now worth 25%.
And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
-hh
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 8:29:10 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 8:17:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 3:27:04 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else... On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as
well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately
after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act on
the advice.
My, my, what a load of revisionism.
No, you were selling the hype in broad hand sweeps. it wasn’t until you got
called on it that you tried to show contemporary specifics…but that’s where
you struggled as your brags failed to perform (see $26.10) & you gave up.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ
(which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was
bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.
No, you showed cherry-picked “what if”s, based on the past performance and
with also with shortsighted momentum trading; IIRC, you’ve never shown any
trades that were planned & expressed as LTCG from their outset. That’s why
I noted you were gambling, not investing. Similarly, you chose these investment
points, as I’d never stated for how long I’d owned ARNA. Suffice to say it was
well before I’d mentioned it. That’s why I dropped multi-year timeframe clues.
Oh, and it paid off too, fortunately (some of my speculations haven’t, of course).
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop
raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.
Keeping in mind how much of that inflation was due to Biden stimulus spending & QE during CoVid in 2020. /s Meantime, any TQQQ that you still held in Dec 2021 is now worth 25%.
And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.
And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
You can buy right now, idiot.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
Within 3 years.
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
-hh
On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 1:06:17 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 8:29:10 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 8:17:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 3:27:04 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as
well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately
after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act on
the advice.
My, my, what a load of revisionism.
No, you were selling the hype in broad hand sweeps. it wasn’t until you got
called on it that you tried to show contemporary specifics…but that’s where
you struggled as your brags failed to perform (see $26.10) & you gave up.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ
(which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was
bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.
No, you showed cherry-picked “what if”s, based on the past performance and
with also with shortsighted momentum trading; IIRC, you’ve never shown any
trades that were planned & expressed as LTCG from their outset. That’s why
I noted you were gambling, not investing. Similarly, you chose these investment
points, as I’d never stated for how long I’d owned ARNA. Suffice to say it was
well before I’d mentioned it. That’s why I dropped multi-year timeframe clues.
Oh, and it paid off too, fortunately (some of my speculations haven’t, of course).
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop
raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.
Keeping in mind how much of that inflation was due to Biden stimulus spending & QE during CoVid in 2020. /s Meantime, any TQQQ that you still held in Dec 2021 is now worth 25%.
And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.
Silence from Tommy.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
Because we know that it wasn't on 15 Aug 2019 when Tommy claimed a nonspecific
“which makes it a good time to buy”, as the first mention of TQQQ came days later,
on 21 Aug 2021, which was apparently also several days after a Tommy had sold it.
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/4T8lYrpc5mk/m/A5HKuzxjAAAJ>
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
Silence from Tommy. No sign that this claim wasn't brand-new as ofAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
Dec 2, 2022, 8:29:10 PM (two days ago). And the irony is that back in
2019 when Tommy first mentioned TQQ, he didn’t wait for a +50% rise,
but bailed out after just an +11% increase.
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
You can buy right now, idiot.Of course I can ... but that wasn't the point being raised.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
Within 3 years.Gosh, that's pessimistic. You still going to be alive in 3 years?
What's the longest amount of time that you've actually held TQQQ for? Because you've never shown any evidence here of trades that weren't short term.
-hh
On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 2:37:24 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 1:06:17 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 8:29:10 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 8:17:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 3:27:04 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as
well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.
Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately
after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act on
the advice.
My, my, what a load of revisionism.
No, you were selling the hype in broad hand sweeps. it wasn’t until you got
called on it that you tried to show contemporary specifics…but that’s where
you struggled as your brags failed to perform (see $26.10) & you gave up.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ
(which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was
bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.
No, you showed cherry-picked “what if”s, based on the past performance and
with also with shortsighted momentum trading; IIRC, you’ve never shown any
trades that were planned & expressed as LTCG from their outset. That’s why
I noted you were gambling, not investing. Similarly, you chose these investment
points, as I’d never stated for how long I’d owned ARNA. Suffice to say it was
well before I’d mentioned it. That’s why I dropped multi-year timeframe clues.
Oh, and it paid off too, fortunately (some of my speculations haven’t, of course).
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop
raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.
Keeping in mind how much of that inflation was due to Biden stimulus
spending & QE during CoVid in 2020. /s Meantime, any TQQQ that you still held in Dec 2021 is now worth 25%.
And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.
And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
Silence from Tommy.
Because we know that it wasn't on 15 Aug 2019 when Tommy claimed a nonspecific
“which makes it a good time to buy”, as the first mention of TQQQ came days later,
on 21 Aug 2021, which was apparently also several days after a Tommy had sold it.
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/4T8lYrpc5mk/m/A5HKuzxjAAAJ>
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
Silence from Tommy. No sign that this claim wasn't brand-new as of
Dec 2, 2022, 8:29:10 PM (two days ago). And the irony is that back in
2019 when Tommy first mentioned TQQ, he didn’t wait for a +50% rise,
but bailed out after just an +11% increase.
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are
going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
You can buy right now, idiot.
Of course I can ... but that wasn't the point being raised.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
Within 3 years.
Gosh, that's pessimistic. You still going to be alive in 3 years?
What's the longest amount of time that you've actually held TQQQ for? Because you've never shown any evidence here of trades that weren't short term.
Hey you fucking lying pervert, you ASKED the QUESTION and I GAVE you the answer!
Now, you don't LIKE the answer - TOO FUCKING BAD!!
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already >>>> at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what >>>> it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are >>>> going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 11:03:43 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 2:37:24 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 1:06:17 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 8:29:10 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 8:17:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 3:27:04 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as
well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.
Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately
after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act on
the advice.
My, my, what a load of revisionism.
No, you were selling the hype in broad hand sweeps. it wasn’t until you got
called on it that you tried to show contemporary specifics…but that’s where
you struggled as your brags failed to perform (see $26.10) & you gave up.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ
(which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was
bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.
No, you showed cherry-picked “what if”s, based on the past performance and
with also with shortsighted momentum trading; IIRC, you’ve never shown any
trades that were planned & expressed as LTCG from their outset. That’s why
I noted you were gambling, not investing. Similarly, you chose these investment
points, as I’d never stated for how long I’d owned ARNA. Suffice to say it was
well before I’d mentioned it. That’s why I dropped multi-year timeframe clues.
Oh, and it paid off too, fortunately (some of my speculations haven’t, of course).
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop
raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.
Keeping in mind how much of that inflation was due to Biden stimulus
spending & QE during CoVid in 2020. /s Meantime, any TQQQ that you
still held in Dec 2021 is now worth 25%.
And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.
And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
Silence from Tommy.
Because we know that it wasn't on 15 Aug 2019 when Tommy claimed a nonspecific
“which makes it a good time to buy”, as the first mention of TQQQ came days later,
on 21 Aug 2021, which was apparently also several days after a Tommy had sold it.
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/4T8lYrpc5mk/m/A5HKuzxjAAAJ>
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
Silence from Tommy. No sign that this claim wasn't brand-new as of
Dec 2, 2022, 8:29:10 PM (two days ago). And the irony is that back in 2019 when Tommy first mentioned TQQ, he didn’t wait for a +50% rise, but bailed out after just an +11% increase.
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are
going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
You can buy right now, idiot.
Of course I can ... but that wasn't the point being raised.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
Within 3 years.
Gosh, that's pessimistic. You still going to be alive in 3 years?
What's the longest amount of time that you've actually held TQQQ for? Because you've never shown any evidence here of trades that weren't short term.
Hey you fucking lying pervert, you ASKED the QUESTION and I GAVE you the answer!Yes, you did finally answer *one* question, even though it was the lowest bar set.
Now, you don't LIKE the answer - TOO FUCKING BAD!!
Likewise, you went with as safe of an answer as you think you can get away with.
Of course, you probably forgot that TQQQ's a recent product with a short track record,
so you didn't look at time horizons based on the NASDAQ Composite that it leverages:
the NASDAQ's history has had periods where it has been negative for more than three
(3) years.
Case in point, see: {Nov07-Jan11} and {Mar00-Feb14} ... and don't forget that these
don't include TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio losses that the NASDAC Composite lacks.
In the meantime, Tommy avoids the less-easy question, namely the unlikelihood
that he himself has the ability/willpower to hold TQQQ for this long.
Even if the bar is lowered to just one year, Tommy hasn't ever bragged (let alone
shown receipts) that he's held TQQQ long enough to pay LTCG tax rates instead of short.
Or, apparently, pretty much anything else. Found in the archives:
[quote]
The record shows otherwise. Here's the first example of one of these so-called
"explicit" buy/sell recommendations:
"Hiding Hughie, you are SO FUCKED UP! I bought TQQQ and held it for a DAY AND A HALF for a ELEVEN PERCENT GAIN!"
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/4T8lYrpc5mk/WRoidM9HAAAJ>
Yes, that's the sell, but it is also the first time that Tom's mentioned TQQQ, which
means his claim of being "explicit on both security and time" is totally missing its
buy recommendation. Conclusion: a complete failure by Tom.
Next, ALXN. There was a buy recommendation which was done okay, but there wasn't any sell criteria volunteered: Tom was pushed to state what his exit criteria
was, which he finally said was a +10% gain, but he ended up losing his nerve and
sold before reaching said criteria. Conclusion: with the +10% sell criteria not
voluntarily included ... and then not met either, can't be considered a success.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/yhHlqMZnqVs/8S_rMeksEQAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/yhHlqMZnqVs/sMpOVqNWAAAJ>
Finally, there was CVX, which Tom refused to note any exit criteria was, and once again, he ended up bailing. If Tom made any gain at all, it was less than 0.2%.
Conclusion: another failure by Tom to provide so-called explicit directions, as well as
a second financial "whoops!" where his prognosis for what profit had failed him:
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/9A3D2vUgI7s/NnOwnhqjAQAJ>
Granted, its only n=3, but the pattern has been that the more explicit Tom has been
with his disclosures, the less financially successful his trades have become.
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/Bi0CClw7Aa0/m/1aSEd4XaBgAJ>
Perhaps Tommy will enlighten us on how briefly he held PONAX too...
-hh
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question: >>>>
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are
going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
And I LOVE that!
:-)
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question: >>>>>>
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are >>>>>> going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are a LOSER!
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 3:03:57 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 11:03:43 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 2:37:24 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 1:06:17 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 8:29:10 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2022 at 8:17:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 3:27:04 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 8:01:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill.
https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs
and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as
well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.
Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
-hh
I gave you PLENTY of trades IN ADVANCE or NEARLY in advance (immediately
after purchase). All you idiots did was to poo-poo each one rather than act on
the advice.
My, my, what a load of revisionism.
No, you were selling the hype in broad hand sweeps. it wasn’t until you got
called on it that you tried to show contemporary specifics…but that’s where
you struggled as your brags failed to perform (see $26.10) & you gave up.
So I stopped giving advice. But you can compare the performance of TQQQ
(which I recommended) relative to the period of ARNA to the point it was
bought out and you will see a substantial outperformance by TQQQ.
No, you showed cherry-picked “what if”s, based on the past performance and
with also with shortsighted momentum trading; IIRC, you’ve never shown any
trades that were planned & expressed as LTCG from their outset. That’s why
I noted you were gambling, not investing. Similarly, you chose these investment
points, as I’d never stated for how long I’d owned ARNA. Suffice to say it was
well before I’d mentioned it. That’s why I dropped multi-year timeframe clues.
Oh, and it paid off too, fortunately (some of my speculations haven’t, of course).
At some point we will get past the Bidenflation and the Fed will stop
raising rates and TQQQ will be a buy again, but not yet.
Keeping in mind how much of that inflation was due to Biden stimulus
spending & QE during CoVid in 2020. /s Meantime, any TQQQ that you
still held in Dec 2021 is now worth 25%.
And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.
And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
Silence from Tommy.
Because we know that it wasn't on 15 Aug 2019 when Tommy claimed a nonspecific
“which makes it a good time to buy”, as the first mention of TQQQ came days later,
on 21 Aug 2021, which was apparently also several days after a Tommy had sold it.
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/4T8lYrpc5mk/m/A5HKuzxjAAAJ>
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
Silence from Tommy. No sign that this claim wasn't brand-new as of
Dec 2, 2022, 8:29:10 PM (two days ago). And the irony is that back in 2019 when Tommy first mentioned TQQ, he didn’t wait for a +50% rise, but bailed out after just an +11% increase.
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are
going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
You can buy right now, idiot.
Of course I can ... but that wasn't the point being raised.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
Within 3 years.
Gosh, that's pessimistic. You still going to be alive in 3 years?
What's the longest amount of time that you've actually held TQQQ for? Because you've never shown any evidence here of trades that weren't short term.
Hey you fucking lying pervert, you ASKED the QUESTION and I GAVE you the answer!
Now, you don't LIKE the answer - TOO FUCKING BAD!!
Yes, you did finally answer *one* question, even though it was the lowest bar set.
Likewise, you went with as safe of an answer as you think you can get away with.
Of course, you probably forgot that TQQQ's a recent product with a short track record,
so you didn't look at time horizons based on the NASDAQ Composite that it leverages:
the NASDAQ's history has had periods where it has been negative for more than three
(3) years.
Case in point, see: {Nov07-Jan11} and {Mar00-Feb14} ... and don't forget that these
don't include TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio losses that the NASDAC Composite lacks.
In the meantime, Tommy avoids the less-easy question, namely the unlikelihood
that he himself has the ability/willpower to hold TQQQ for this long.
Even if the bar is lowered to just one year, Tommy hasn't ever bragged (let alone
shown receipts) that he's held TQQQ long enough to pay LTCG tax rates instead of short.
Or, apparently, pretty much anything else. Found in the archives:
[quote]
The record shows otherwise. Here's the first example of one of these so-called
"explicit" buy/sell recommendations:
"Hiding Hughie, you are SO FUCKED UP! I bought TQQQ and held it for a DAY AND A HALF for a ELEVEN PERCENT GAIN!"
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/4T8lYrpc5mk/WRoidM9HAAAJ>
Yes, that's the sell, but it is also the first time that Tom's mentioned TQQQ, which
means his claim of being "explicit on both security and time" is totally missing its
buy recommendation. Conclusion: a complete failure by Tom.
Next, ALXN. There was a buy recommendation which was done okay, but there wasn't any sell criteria volunteered: Tom was pushed to state what his exit criteria
was, which he finally said was a +10% gain, but he ended up losing his nerve and
sold before reaching said criteria. Conclusion: with the +10% sell criteria not
voluntarily included ... and then not met either, can't be considered a success.
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/yhHlqMZnqVs/8S_rMeksEQAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/yhHlqMZnqVs/sMpOVqNWAAAJ>
Finally, there was CVX, which Tom refused to note any exit criteria was, and
once again, he ended up bailing. If Tom made any gain at all, it was less than 0.2%.
Conclusion: another failure by Tom to provide so-called explicit directions, as well as
a second financial "whoops!" where his prognosis for what profit had failed him:
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/9A3D2vUgI7s/NnOwnhqjAQAJ>
Granted, its only n=3, but the pattern has been that the more explicit Tom has been
with his disclosures, the less financially successful his trades have become.
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/Bi0CClw7Aa0/m/1aSEd4XaBgAJ>
Perhaps Tommy will enlighten us on how briefly he held PONAX too...
LOL!
So, did you follow my advice and buy TQQQ today? I doubt it.
Well, I DID, near the day's low at 22 (I LIKE IT when things go on sale!).
I don't care if it drops lower from here because I WILL hold it for the long term.
What I have noticed about you is that you are LONG on bullshit and SHORT on action.
You will NEVER become a multimillionaire with that attitude.
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward question: >>>>>>
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old platitude that the Markets
will “eventually” come back (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the
question is one of time and if the investor will live long enough to see it,
especially for those in their fiscal de-accumulation life phase & already
at their Actuarial lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have an inkling for what
it is likely to be this time … so then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed rate hikes are
going to end to invoke a buy-in at bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon expectation is for when even
just TQQQ will return to its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are a LOSER!Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdAnd when was that statement made? Got cite with the
it.
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdAnd when was that statement made? Got cite with the
it.
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time forLet me give you a piece of advice:
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdAnd when was that statement made? Got cite with the
it.
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back >>>>>>>>>> (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action' >>
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdAnd when was that statement made? Got cite with the
it.
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward >>>>>>>>>> question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back >>>>>>>>>> (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial >>>>>>>>>> lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so >>>>>>>>>> then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed >>>>>>>>>> rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are >>>>> a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.Nope, Sunshine.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdAnd when was that statement made? Got cite with the
it.
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward >>>>>>>>>>>> question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back >>>>>>>>>>>> (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question >>>>>>>>>>>> is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal >>>>>>>>>>>> de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial >>>>>>>>>>>> lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so >>>>>>>>>>>> then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed >>>>>>>>>>>> rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are >>>>>>> a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice". >>
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward >>>>>>>>>>>> question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back >>>>>>>>>>>> (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question >>>>>>>>>>>> is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal >>>>>>>>>>>> de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial >>>>>>>>>>>> lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>>>>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have >>>>>>>>>>>> an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so >>>>>>>>>>>> then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed >>>>>>>>>>>> rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to >>>>>>>>>>>> its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed! >>>>>>>> You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are >>>>>>> a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline >>>>> into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?I get it fine, Sunshine.
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward >>>>>>>>>>>>>> question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal >>>>>>>>>>>>>> de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed! >>>>>>>>>> You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are >>>>>>>>> a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline >>>>>>> into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice". >>>>
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information: >>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward >>>>>>>>>>>>>> question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal >>>>>>>>>>>>>> de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed! >>>>>>>>>> You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are >>>>>>>>> a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline >>>>>>> into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is >>>> another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly). >>>>
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything, Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information: >>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed! >>>>>>>>>>>> You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are >>>>>>>>>>> a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline >>>>>>>>> into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is >>>>>> another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly). >>>>>>
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information: >>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed! >>>>>>>>>>>> You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline >>>>>>>>> into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is >>>>>> another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly). >>>>>>
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything, >> Sunshine.
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information: >>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed! >>>>>>>>>>>> You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for >>>>>>>>> self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is >>>>>> another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack ofWhat's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
interest in explaining my life to you.
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you stillIronically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
don't know what "advice" is.
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
-hh
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for >>>>>>>>> self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this declineOn Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information: >>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed! >>>>>>>>>>>> You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for >>>>>>>>> self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information: >>>>>>>>>>
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
with a weight of 3.153
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 6:51:29 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for >>>>>>>>> self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Tesla stock has lost a lot of value over this year while Musk has lost all credibility as a champion of free speechHey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
with a weight of 3.153
He has camcelled an outrageous number of accounts over the past week and prevented new accounts from certain countries, without rationale
And as for the preposterous Twitter files, release, those make Trump at fault, not Biden
“Twitter files chicanery”. Just like watergate.
(Biden wasn’t even president when this “chicanery” occurred)
Our national (political) obsession with twitter has become really over-the-top stupid.
These people really need to get off twitter and go see grass once in awhile.
Woods later deleted the below tweet
James Woods
@RealJamesWoods
How is the Twitter Files chicanery any different from Watergate in sum and substance?
Nixon resigned when his henchmen tried to subvert free speech.
Your turn, Mr. Biden.
12/2/22, 9:34 PM
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 6:51:29 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for >>>>>>>>> self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Tesla stock has lost a lot of value over this year while Musk has lost all credibility as a champion of free speechHey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
with a weight of 3.153
He has camcelled an outrageous number of accounts over the past week and prevented new accounts from certain countries, without rationale
And as for the preposterous Twitter files, release, those make Trump at fault, not Biden
“Twitter files chicanery”. Just like watergate.
(Biden wasn’t even president when this “chicanery” occurred)
Our national (political) obsession with twitter has become really over-the-top stupid.
These people really need to get off twitter and go see grass once in awhile.
Woods later deleted the below tweet
James Woods
@RealJamesWoods
How is the Twitter Files chicanery any different from Watergate in sum and substance?
Nixon resigned when his henchmen tried to subvert free speech.
Your turn, Mr. Biden.
12/2/22, 9:34 PM
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for >>>>>>>>> self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information: >>>>>>>>>>
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the historical recovery timeframes have been and have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
-hh
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 2:15:08 AM UTC+1, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:01:14 PM UTC+1, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound? FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance (or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.
Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
Damn jet lag. Looks like it was Sept 2019 and CVX:
“ Very small if at all: yesterday’s high was only 124.18 and that happened in
the last 20 minutes of the Market’s hours. That makes your theoretical max
only 124.18/124 = a +0.145% gain ... before trading costs. “
and:
“i was merely noting that his claim wasn’t literally impossible.
And from even the literary best case, his maximum gain potential
of ~$27 ($26.10, actually) from $25K wasn’t anything to crow about.
I doubt he covered his fees on both ends; given his readiness to be dishonest
I doubt he made any gain at all.
Fidelity’s published fee is US$4.95 per fee. Times two trades is $9.90. This
means that Tom’s theoretical max gain on his claim was actually $26.10, which
is less than the $27 that I said “less than” on. I didn’t round the trade fees off
to $10 this time, but I will do so in the future. ”
Oh, and Tommy’s ALXN was mentioned in that thread too.
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/9A3D2vUgI7s/m/A_zdeUs2AwAJ>Missed one other one on CVX:
“Similarly, to have made a $1,000+ gain would have required
5611+ shares, requiring no less than ~$673,325 in capital.”
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/9A3D2vUgI7s/m/XfGNsaS_AQAJ>
Backing that out to just the “$250K” claim Tommy makes above, that amount invested in CVX in this past trade would have returned roughly
all of a +$370 gain (+0.15%) on his speculative gamble…and a much
bigger loss if he had waited one more day that week before bailing out.
Plus the irony is that CVX is since up for investors: $183 (+27%)
-hh
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:41:59 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 2:15:08 AM UTC+1, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:01:14 PM UTC+1, -hh wrote:
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:34:44 AM UTC+1, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:32:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:06:23 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:03:43 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:01:28 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:09:52 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Gosh, May to November: took just six months for Tommy to come up with a comeback...
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 12:19:13 AM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2022 at 3:05:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
Found this while searching for something else...
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:13:01 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 2:27:19 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, January 2, 2022 at 6:29:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
But they're an EV company, right? So are you still saying "all EVs suck",...
or are you simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound?
Commit to your position Tommy.
The company in the original post, GOEV, is down FORTY-ONE PERCENT!
Which of these dogs did YOU invest in?
How did ARNA do in 2021? /s
FYI, I'll bet you $100 right now that ARNA's stock price won't drop by
more than this -41% in 2022 that you're crowing about ... care to seal
that offer in welch-proof terms? Or are you going to run for the hills (again)?
The Lyin' Asshole omits the fact that I was VERY SPECIFIC about the EV companies
that suck, which they DEFINITELY DO!
So what? As was noted above: "many startups fail", which everyone already knows.Although Tommy did also invoke his old favorite of TQQQ.
...
Meantime, Tommy dodges & runs on an ARNA wager offer...
So then...a look back:
11 Jan 2022:
ARNA: $93.25
TQQQ: $75.48
7 May 2022 (today):
ARNA: $100 (+7%)
TQQQ: $36.41 (-52%)
So it sounds like you FUCKED UP your vaunted exit strategy, Lyin' Asshole.
On the contrary, for I made money on what I noted was quite speculative.
As I said way back, the Institutionals were investing in it and it wasn't
quite clear to me as to just why, but I was willing to give it a shot.
The [ARNA] buyout occurred prior to my deadline, which works out just fine.
Of course, there will be taxes to pay, but it will be at the lower Long Term
Capital Gains rate, as it wasn't your style of short term daytrading...that
effectively nets another +10% margin or so.
Of course since it was a windfall on discretionary funds, the next question is
if to hoard or splurge ... thinking the latter. Perhaps a short notice holiday;
maybe with seats in First Class...sound reasonable?
At least ONE of these scammers has been brought to justice: Trevor Milton,
whose company Nikola built a phony truck with no motor that they notoriously
filmed in motion by letting it roll down a hill. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud
Nikola stock hit a high of $94 - it is now trading for $2.
And does finding *one* scam artist prove "all EVs suck"? Or are you *still*
simply trying to make "water is wet" sound new & profound? FYI, that early ARNA windfall paid for a nice trip to the Caribbean, as we had found
First Class seats on sale. And sure, "pics or it didn't happen", so here's a few:
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/>
FWIW, I'm going to have to hit my reference books to find just which type of
blenny this fish is...think its a "redlip":
<http://huntzinger.com/photo/2022/brac/20220601-9830.jpeg>
Hey Lyin' Asshole, by my count I have produced FIVE, but who's counting?
Five ... what? Five fish? Five EVs?
LOL! You just proved that you can't count to FIVE!!The quantity wasn’t the question, but what it was being counted.
Pretty sure you got all excited again and replied to the wrong post.
Nope. You have.Sure about that? Because the subject had moved on, twice, first to EVs and then to fish. So if you’re referring back to trades again, and ones
that you announced buys & sells in advance, you need to be clear, as well as provide substantiation.
BTW, I have in the past shown trades that would have yielded TENS OF THOUSANDS
in profits, but you libtards were too smart to take advantage of them. Oh well....
Not in advance you didn't.
Plus some of your brags had such low margin that to make your claim needed ~$250K trades.
No Lyin' Asshole - go back and review them.The one I was referring to was where you did assert properly in advance
(or close enough) on both ends, but the prices were such that you were boxed
in such that your max possible profit for those trade days meant you could
only make IIRC $26 per $10K.
Besides, us multimillionaires don't regard $250k as all that much.Multimillionaires aren’t terrified of risking $100, but you’ve run away from that
on multiple opportunities.
Sure, TQQQ last year was an exception, but you never called the top (exit) on it, and despite
how you've claimed TQQQ is "something more stable". it is now down -73% YTD. Oops.
Oh, YES I DID! You asked and I delivered.
Nope. You only posted some hypotheticals. Now you did claim a sell of TQQQ & PONAX,
but not proactively, nor in advance, nor either one’s specific buy/sell dates. As was noted,
it’s the first time that you’ve missed an opportunity to brag about yourself.
Damn jet lag. Looks like it was Sept 2019 and CVX:
“ Very small if at all: yesterday’s high was only 124.18 and that happened in
the last 20 minutes of the Market’s hours. That makes your theoretical max
only 124.18/124 = a +0.145% gain ... before trading costs. “
and:
“i was merely noting that his claim wasn’t literally impossible.
And from even the literary best case, his maximum gain potential
of ~$27 ($26.10, actually) from $25K wasn’t anything to crow about.
I doubt he covered his fees on both ends; given his readiness to be dishonest
I doubt he made any gain at all.
Fidelity’s published fee is US$4.95 per fee. Times two trades is $9.90. This
means that Tom’s theoretical max gain on his claim was actually $26.10, which
is less than the $27 that I said “less than” on. I didn’t round the trade fees off
to $10 this time, but I will do so in the future. ”
Oh, and Tommy’s ALXN was mentioned in that thread too.
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/9A3D2vUgI7s/m/A_zdeUs2AwAJ>Missed one other one on CVX:
“Similarly, to have made a $1,000+ gain would have required
5611+ shares, requiring no less than ~$673,325 in capital.”
< https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/9A3D2vUgI7s/m/XfGNsaS_AQAJ>
Backing that out to just the “$250K” claim Tommy makes above, that amount invested in CVX in this past trade would have returned roughly
all of a +$370 gain (+0.15%) on his speculative gamble…and a much
bigger loss if he had waited one more day that week before bailing out.
Plus the irony is that CVX is since up for investors: $183 (+27%)
-hh
LOL! Let's just wait until the Republicans hold hearings on this - which won't
be very far in the future, say a month.
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for >>>>>>>>> self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and hold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part.
Is it really only 0 for 2?
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of others
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - and
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for >>>>>>>>> self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is it really only 0 for 2?No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdAnd when was that statement made? Got cite with the
it.
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?” - this thread, 31 Dec 2021
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
-hh
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
-hh
You fucking libtards are even MORE dense than I thought. Tesla WAS NOT in the article that I so generously posted for you cheap libtards. PERIOD!
Homework assignment: list ALL of the companies that WERE listed.
Don't respond UNTIL you have completed this simple assignment.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:04:25 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice. >>>>
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
-hh
You fucking libtards are even MORE dense than I thought. Tesla WAS NOT in the article that I so generously posted for you cheap libtards. PERIOD!
Then why can’t you bring yourself to answer the very simple question posed? “FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
Homework assignment: list ALL of the companies that WERE listed.
Don't respond UNTIL you have completed this simple assignment.
Nope. Since you didn’t respond, no one else needs to either.
-hh
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:15:26 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:04:25 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice. >>>>
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
-hh
You fucking libtards are even MORE dense than I thought. Tesla WAS NOT in
the article that I so generously posted for you cheap libtards. PERIOD!
Then why can’t you bring yourself to answer the very simple question posed?
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
Homework assignment: list ALL of the companies that WERE listed.
Don't respond UNTIL you have completed this simple assignment.
Nope. Since you didn’t respond, no one else needs to either.
-hhBTW, TQQQ closed today at $19.64/share. Still hasn’t hit my order price, but it’s looking more likely…perhaps Tommy needs to contemplate the advice he got…
-hh
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for >>>>>>>>> self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote:The “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is it really only 0 for 2?No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdAnd when was that statement made? Got cite with the
it.
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?”
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?” - this thread, 31 Dec 2021
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
-hh
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 3:18:19 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:15:26 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:04:25 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh
wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of others
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
-hh
You fucking libtards are even MORE dense than I thought. Tesla WAS NOT in
the article that I so generously posted for you cheap libtards. PERIOD!
Then why can’t you bring yourself to answer the very simple question posed?
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
Homework assignment: list ALL of the companies that WERE listed.
Don't respond UNTIL you have completed this simple assignment.
Nope. Since you didn’t respond, no one else needs to either.
-hh
BTW, TQQQ closed today at $19.64/share. Still hasn’t hit my order price, but it’s looking more likely…perhaps Tommy needs to contemplate the advice he got…
Like I said, I don't care if it goes lower because I know the market WILL recover in the long term.
I didn't buy a large amount, and will dollar-cost average into it over the next
several months as I think the market is going thru a bottoming process. Sounds like you have an outstanding limit order, too, so you must be thinking
the same thing.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
I NEVER said that "all EV's suck," just the Tesla wannabe's.
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
So what?
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
That was off topic and had NOTHING to do with the EV companies mentioned, which lost money while the market was going UP.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:58:21 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice. >>>>
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
I NEVER said that "all EV's suck," just the Tesla wannabe's.Incorrect: you didn’t make that differentiation until now.
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
So what?It illustrates how you try to make sweeping generalizations, but then you duck and run when you’re asked if it really was as sweepingly broad or not.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
That was off topic and had NOTHING to do with the EV companies mentioned, which lost money while the market was going UP.Okay, so you’ve now admitted that you attempted a diversion. So noted!
-hh
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:58:21 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice. >>>>
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
I NEVER said that "all EV's suck," just the Tesla wannabe's.Incorrect: you didn’t make that differentiation until now.
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
So what?It illustrates how you try to make sweeping generalizations, but then you duck and run when you’re asked if it really was as sweepingly broad or not.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
That was off topic and had NOTHING to do with the EV companies mentioned,Okay, so you’ve now admitted that you attempted a diversion. So noted!
which lost money while the market was going UP.
-hhNo, it is you libtards that are trying to divert the subject. If you go back and check, my recent post was about the fraudster, Trevor Milton, an EV scammer who was brought to justice.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:58:21 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh
wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
I NEVER said that "all EV's suck," just the Tesla wannabe's.Incorrect: you didn’t make that differentiation until now.
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
So what?It illustrates how you try to make sweeping generalizations, but then you
duck and run when you’re asked if it really was as sweepingly broad or not.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
That was off topic and had NOTHING to do with the EV companies mentioned,Okay, so you’ve now admitted that you attempted a diversion. So noted!
which lost money while the market was going UP.
And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are-hhNo, it is you libtards that are trying to divert the subject. If you go back and check,
my recent post was about the fraudster, Trevor Milton, an EV scammer who was
brought to justice.
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten) dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:58:21 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh
wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
Is it really only 0 for 2? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
I NEVER said that "all EV's suck," just the Tesla wannabe's.Incorrect: you didn’t make that differentiation until now.
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
So what?It illustrates how you try to make sweeping generalizations, but then you
duck and run when you’re asked if it really was as sweepingly broad or not.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
That was off topic and had NOTHING to do with the EV companies mentioned,Okay, so you’ve now admitted that you attempted a diversion. So noted!
which lost money while the market was going UP.
So? You were advised of that possibility:And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are-hhNo, it is you libtards that are trying to divert the subject. If you go back and check,
my recent post was about the fraudster, Trevor Milton, an EV scammer who was
brought to justice.
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten) dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point, you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus.
-hh
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
[etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus.
LOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
[etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.Second request.
[...]
And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
Still.That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus.
LOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homework
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done.
-hh
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
[etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a >>>> deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.” >>>>
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkSo, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought >>>>> these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT! >>>>OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus.
LOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done.
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:58:21 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh
wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
Is it really only 0 for 2? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
I NEVER said that "all EV's suck," just the Tesla wannabe's.Incorrect: you didn’t make that differentiation until now.
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
So what?It illustrates how you try to make sweeping generalizations, but then you
duck and run when you’re asked if it really was as sweepingly broad or not.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
That was off topic and had NOTHING to do with the EV companies mentioned,Okay, so you’ve now admitted that you attempted a diversion. So noted!
which lost money while the market was going UP.
So? You were advised of that possibility:And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are-hhNo, it is you libtards that are trying to divert the subject. If you go back and check,
my recent post was about the fraudster, Trevor Milton, an EV scammer who was
brought to justice.
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten) dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a deliberate scam - aka fraud.
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> [etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.” >>>>>>
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkSo, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought >>>>>>> these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT! >>>>>>OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus.
LOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done.
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.
On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> [etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.” >>>>
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkSo, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought >>>>> these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT! >>>>OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus.
LOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done.
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
:-)
On 2022-12-16 11:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> [etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkLOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus. >>>>>
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done.
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.See if you can just type it again - it's "VERY obvious" your fingers are working.
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-16 11:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:See if you can just type it again - it's "VERY obvious" your fingers are
On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> [etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.” >>>>>>>>
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkLOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and boughtOTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT! >>>>>>>>
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus. >>>>>>>
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done.
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.
working.
No - let's see if you're SMART enough to find it.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:58:21 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hh
wrote:You're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine.
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread.
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made a
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering.
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice".
Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
I NEVER said that "all EV's suck," just the Tesla wannabe's.Incorrect: you didn’t make that differentiation until now.
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
So what?It illustrates how you try to make sweeping generalizations, but then you
duck and run when you’re asked if it really was as sweepingly broad or not.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten) dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.That was off topic and had NOTHING to do with the EV companies mentioned,Okay, so you’ve now admitted that you attempted a diversion. So noted!
which lost money while the market was going UP.
And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post, they lost-hhNo, it is you libtards that are trying to divert the subject. If you go back and check, my recent post was about the fraudster, Trevor Milton, an EV scammer who was brought to justice.
So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
On 2022-12-16 14:13, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-16 11:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:See if you can just type it again - it's "VERY obvious" your fingers are >> working.
On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> [etc]
Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkLOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus. >>>>>>>
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done.
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.
No - let's see if you're SMART enough to find it.So you can't provide it.
Gotcha.
:-)
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 2:41:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-16 14:13, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:So you can't provide it.
On 2022-12-16 11:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:See if you can just type it again - it's "VERY obvious" your fingers are >>>> working.
On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [etc]
Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkLOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus. >>>>>>>>>
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done.
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.
No - let's see if you're SMART enough to find it.
Gotcha.
:-)
So you are NOT smart enough to find it. Got it.
On 2022-12-17 22:26, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 2:41:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-16 14:13, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:So you can't provide it.
On 2022-12-16 11:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:See if you can just type it again - it's "VERY obvious" your fingers are
On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [etc]What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkLOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus. >>>>>>>>>
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done.
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.
working.
No - let's see if you're SMART enough to find it.
Gotcha.
:-)
So you are NOT smart enough to find it. Got it.It doesn't exist.
If it did, you'd already be rubbing it in my face.
On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 11:03:07 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-17 22:26, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 2:41:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:It doesn't exist.
On 2022-12-16 14:13, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:So you can't provide it.
On 2022-12-16 11:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:See if you can just type it again - it's "VERY obvious" your fingers are >>>>>> working.
On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [etc]What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkLOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus. >>>>>>>>>>>
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done. >>>>>>>>>>
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.
No - let's see if you're SMART enough to find it.
Gotcha.
:-)
So you are NOT smart enough to find it. Got it.
If it did, you'd already be rubbing it in my face.
Well, it DOES, but you are TOO DUMB to see it.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 1:16:38 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2022 at 4:51:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 10:55:15 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:43:29 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:00:01 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-11 23:38, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-09 17:49, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 5:18:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2022-12-09 14:49, Tommy wrote:Me not answering your deflections doesn't say anything about anything,
On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 8:12:28 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I get it fine, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-07 18:43, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 1:38:54 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope, Sunshine.
On 2022-12-06 13:36, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Let me give you a piece of advice:
On 2022-12-05 21:39, Tommy wrote:Oh, YES IT IS! A normal person would take this time for
On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 9:11:07 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Sunshine, let me give you a an actual piece of information:
On 2022-12-04 20:07, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-8, -hhYou're definitely butt-hurt as well, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-12-03 05:58, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Lyin' Asshole, I told you to buy TQQQ and holdThe “0 for 2” is just within this subthread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is it really only 0 for 2?it.And when was that statement made? Got cite with the
date?
ALL you had to do was sell it AFTER you had made aAnd when did you say “sell after +50%”? Got cite?
50% profit. THAT'S IT!!!!
In the meantime, you’ve dodged here the looking forward
question:
“And sure, we can assure ourselves with the old
platitude that the Markets will “eventually” come back
(side-eye at Japan, clutching pearls) but the question
is one of time and if the investor will live long
enough to see it, especially for those in their fiscal
de-accumulation life phase & already at their Actuarial
lifespan age. Thus, an good investor would know what
the historical recovery timeframes have been and have
an inkling for what it is likely to be this time … so
then, do you have one, Tommy?” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So then Tommy: you’ve been asked before when QT and Fed
rate hikes are going to end to invoke a buy-in at
bottom window, but you’ve dodged answering. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Likewise, you’ve not said what your time horizon
expectation is for when even just TQQQ will return to
its 2021 year end price.
You’re 0 for 2 just on this part. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
-hh
As judged by the LYIN' ASSHOLE - ask me if I am impressed!
And I LOVE that!
:-)
Let me give you a carefully judged piece of advice, Alan: you are
a LOSER!
Calling someone "a LOSER" is not a "piece of advice". >>>>>>>>>
self-reflection and make an honest effort to reverse this decline
into oblivion.
You should invest in a DICTIONARY, Sunshine.
'ad·vice | ədˈvīs |
noun
1 guidance or recommendations offered with regard to prudent future action'
:-)
Hey Fool, your reply is a non-sequitur (look it up), which is not surprising coming from a loser.
It was precisely on point to refute your claim that an insult is "advice".
So I guess "non sequitur" (note the correct omission of the "-") is
another term you need to look up (and learn how to spell correctly).
:-)
Sorry dude, but you just DON'T GET IT. Tell me, what accomplishment in life are you MOST proud of?
You think that insulting people is giving them advice.
It's not.
Okay, Fool, got it - there is NOTHING that you have done with your life that you are proud of!
Sunshine.
You didn't give me any advice.
Deal with it.
Right - you have NOTHING that you have done in your life that you are proud of. Got it.
Nope. That is not a conclusion you can draw from my utter lack of
interest in explaining my life to you.
What's blatantly obvious by how Tommy shifting the conversation is that it was really nothing
more than a classical setup attempt, because the answer to that question is always "family".
I can only conclude that you are one of those "stupid libtards" that invested in one of those scam EV companies.
I can only conclude that you have a learning disability as you still
don't know what "advice" is.
Ironically, since the new EVs are more often listed on the NASDAQ, the implications of who the
biggest braggart of investing in 'scam' EV companies on RSG is ... why gosh, it is Tommy, due
to him investing with an index thereof (TQQQ),
Hardly. It is a STRAIGHT-UP question.Hey Lyin' Asshole, I pose the same question to YOU, and you can answer any way you wish.Already have answered, because I recognized the question as a rhetorical trap.
Maybe it is your family, or maybe it is that you invented a new type of ice cream - that is up to you.Maybe Tommy doesn't have a Need to Know. In the meantime, I notice that Tommy's not answered
his own question, so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?
A fish counter?
HA HA HA HA! The libtard shows his TRUE COLORS - denigrating the achievements of othersNah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others answer
to make his meager accomplishments look more impressive!!
this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
Investing in an index means investing in some dogs, even if the amount is minuscule.
Yet you're still putting money into a market segment that you're disabusing.
The advantage is that you can get 3x leverage that isn't easily available with individual stocks.
TQQQ uses derivatives of QQQ; if you look at the top 103 holdings in QQQ none of these EV
companies even show up. The smallest percentage of these 103 is 0.08%, so these EV dogs
are quite a bit less than that - irrelevant for all practical purposes.
That's an odd claim, because TSLA is an EV company, and TSLA is listed as #7 on the NASDAQ 100,
with a weight of 3.153
That 3.153% is a mere 40x larger than what you're trying to ask for is to ignore as irrelevant/noise.
Even on just a $5,000 lot, its fraction is more than some of the wager offers you've run away from here.
And sure, you're talking about the %'s in Investco Funds, not the NASDAQ Index itself, as a Fund can
mismatch the Index it claims to be tracking. Checking, QQQ has TSLA at 2.76% and TQQQ is at 1.60%.
Some of that % mismatch is likely because rebalancing schedules vs how TSLA has fallen much more
than the NASDAQ this year (TSLA has tanked by a mere 60%) ... what's your "3x Leverage" effect from that?
LOL! Tesla WAS NOT one of the FIVE that I clearly listed as suckering in libtards - andI am sticking to the subject, with a memory better than yours:
YOU KNOW IT, so this is typical libtard setup. STICK TO THE FUCKING SUBJECT, moron!!
“FYI, if his claim is that all EV’s suck… as opposed to simply noting than
many startups fail … then why didn’t [Tommy] forget to mention TSLA?”
- this thread, 31 Dec 2021
Checking the archives, you never answered this.
Well, simply put, the YTD on TQQQ is -73.9%
And WHAT do you WANT to do, buy HIGH and sell LOW or buy LOW and sell HIGH?Nope: it is simply another retrospective observation, equally valid as yours.
Cry harder.
-hhYou fucking libtards are even MORE dense than I thought. Tesla WAS NOT in the article that I so generously posted for you cheap libtards. PERIOD!
Homework assignment: list ALL of the companies that WERE listed. Don't respond UNTIL you have completed this simple assignment.
On 2022-12-19 00:00, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 11:03:07 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-17 22:26, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 2:41:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:It doesn't exist.
On 2022-12-16 14:13, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:So you can't provide it.
On 2022-12-16 11:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:See if you can just type it again - it's "VERY obvious" your fingers are
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
[etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkSo, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus.
LOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done. >>>>>>>>>>
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.
working.
No - let's see if you're SMART enough to find it.
Gotcha.
:-)
So you are NOT smart enough to find it. Got it.
If it did, you'd already be rubbing it in my face.
Well, it DOES, but you are TOO DUMB to see it.And still you cannot produce the actual quote!
On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 1:19:11 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-19 00:00, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 11:03:07 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:And still you cannot produce the actual quote!
On 2022-12-17 22:26, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 2:41:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:It doesn't exist.
On 2022-12-16 14:13, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:So you can't provide it.
On 2022-12-16 11:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:See if you can just type it again - it's "VERY obvious" your fingers are
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Still.And, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on.
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkLOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.
working.
No - let's see if you're SMART enough to find it.
Gotcha.
:-)
So you are NOT smart enough to find it. Got it.
If it did, you'd already be rubbing it in my face.
Well, it DOES, but you are TOO DUMB to see it.
Just ADMIT that you are TOO DUMB to see it and I will produce it, gleefully!
On 2022-12-23 22:45, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 1:19:11 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-12-19 00:00, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 11:03:07 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:And still you cannot produce the actual quote!
On 2022-12-17 22:26, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 2:41:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:It doesn't exist.
On 2022-12-16 14:13, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-12-16 11:15, Tommy wrote:So you can't provide it.
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 11:11:14 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-16 11:09, Tommy wrote:See if you can just type it again - it's "VERY obvious" your fingers are
On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 4:56:03 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:18:32 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:36:27 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 8:44:32 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:What "FACT" did you post, Sunshine?
Gosh, amazing how Tommy "missed" that again.On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 5:27:54 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:10:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
[etc]
Nah. Just a dollop of sarcasm, since you’ve tried to demand that others
answer this question while you’ve not done so yourself:
“… so the turnabout is after family, what's Tommy's biggest life accomplishment?”
Second request.
[...]
Ah, yes, those "tricks", namely that to be an actual investor means to go do one's homeworkAnd, back to the original subject, only TWO of the original FOUR companies are
still listed, GOEV and RIDE. These two had lost 66% and 59% of their value from
their 52-week highs, respectively AT THE TIME OF THE POST. Following that post,
they lost ANOTHER 85% and 89%. RMO was bought out for pennies on the (ten)
dollar by EV truck maker Nikola. XL Fleet still is in business but is not listed.
So? You were advised of that possibility:
“ Market Investments invariably incur a risk, which can include a 100% loss of
one's investments. In addition to the normal risks of new start-ups and the like,
there's also the risks of an unscrupulous offer which was intended to be a
deliberate scam - aka fraud.
When you made your claim, you've taken both possibilities and lumped it into
only the latter.
The burden is now upon you to actually substantiate that each one of the instances
that you cited actually was a case of a deliberate fraud, as opposed to just being a
speculative investment which wasn't fiscally successful. Good luck.”
That’s what you’ve still failed to deliver on. >>>>>>>>>>>> Still.
So, if any of you libtards thought you were smarter than me and bought
these dogs your investment is, for all practical purposes, WIPED OUT!
OTOH, the latter does not necessarily follow from the former. Case in point,
you’ve not even shown that you’re able to read a prospectus.
LOL! The Lyin' Asshole is up to his OLD TRICKS!!
instead of gambling based on a gut hunch... /s
Go back to my recent posts and find a fact that can ONLY be found in a prospectus - and REPORT BACK!!!You've not posted any quoted text from a prospectus. Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh
Sorry, dude, but I DID post a FACT, not a quote, from a prospectus, so you are NOT DONE!
:-)
Go see if you can find it - it is VERY obvious.
working.
No - let's see if you're SMART enough to find it.
Gotcha.
:-)
So you are NOT smart enough to find it. Got it.
If it did, you'd already be rubbing it in my face.
Well, it DOES, but you are TOO DUMB to see it.
Just ADMIT that you are TOO DUMB to see it and I will produce it, gleefully!Just admit you can't produce it.
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:15:26 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:04:25 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
[...]
BTW, TQQQ closed today at $19.64/share. Still hasn’t hit my order price, but it’s looking more likely…perhaps Tommy needs to contemplate the advice he got…
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:18:19 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:15:26 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:04:25 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
[...]
BTW, TQQQ closed today at $19.64/share. Still hasn’t hit my order price, but it’s looking more likely…perhaps Tommy needs to contemplate the advice he got…12/27/22 update: TQQQ low & close: $16.72 & $16.84
Looks like I can expect some paperwork in the mail from a certain limit order...
-hh
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 1:34:36 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:18:19 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:15:26 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:04:25 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 4:43:27 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
[...]
BTW, TQQQ closed today at $19.64/share. Still hasn’t hit my order price,
but it’s looking more likely…perhaps Tommy needs to contemplate the advice he got…
12/27/22 update: TQQQ low & close: $16.72 & $16.84
Looks like I can expect some paperwork in the mail from a certain limit order...
The Lyin' Asshole is welcome to tell us EXACTLY when the market has reached its bottom,
but I am not holding my breath!
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
-hh
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 2:22:02 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
Notice that the Lyin' Asshole said NOTHING about when the market will bottom -
I didn't expect him to (in fact I EXPECTED him to DODGE the question!).
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 9:01:49 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 2:22:02 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
Notice that the Lyin' Asshole said NOTHING about when the market will bottom -Except it was previously addressed in this thread nine days ago, on 29 Dec 22,
I didn't expect him to (in fact I EXPECTED him to DODGE the question!).
which quoted how you were told this over a month ago, on 18 Nov 22:
[quote]
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not
current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
Except for Black Swans/etc, of course. But your attempted point was already acknowledged above, “… under downward pressure so long as the Fed is raising interest rates.”, as this was why I flatly asked you:
“So then: are you claiming that Fed rate hikes are already over?”
And of course you were silent on that question. How brave of you.
The dilemma you have is that just which hike is the “last” rate hike ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
often isn’t known when it happens, but is decided some time thereafter ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ retrospectively. That’s why investor opinions vary on if market inflection ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
should be expected at {0, 3, 4, 6, etc} months prior to said “last”. Of course,
there’s also strategies on how to address this uncertainty factor too… [/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/_1pDlBNKtJk/m/DuyPAcdUAAAJ>
and
[quote]
"... it seems evident to me that the bear market rallies which were starting to
anticipate a bottom were premature, so we're likely in for continued Fed rate
hikes for longer into 2023 than what the Market had expected.
[/quote]
<ibid>
Forget this already, Tommy? Maybe you can buy *one* cup of Starbucks coffee from your TQQQ dividend to try to jog your memory?
-hh
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 8:26:34 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 9:01:49 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 2:22:02 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
Notice that the Lyin' Asshole said NOTHING about when the market will bottom -
I didn't expect him to (in fact I EXPECTED him to DODGE the question!).
Except it was previously addressed in this thread nine days ago, on 29 Dec 22,
which quoted how you were told this over a month ago, on 18 Nov 22: [quote]
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not
current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
Except for Black Swans/etc, of course. But your attempted point was already
acknowledged above, “… under downward pressure so long as the Fed is raising interest rates.”, as this was why I flatly asked you:
“So then: are you claiming that Fed rate hikes are already over?”
And of course you were silent on that question. How brave of you.
The dilemma you have is that just which hike is the “last” rate hike ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ often isn’t known when it happens, but is decided some time thereafter ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ retrospectively. That’s why investor opinions vary on if market inflection
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
should be expected at {0, 3, 4, 6, etc} months prior to said “last”. Of course,
there’s also strategies on how to address this uncertainty factor too… [/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/_1pDlBNKtJk/m/DuyPAcdUAAAJ>
and
[quote]
"... it seems evident to me that the bear market rallies which were starting to
anticipate a bottom were premature, so we're likely in for continued Fed rate
hikes for longer into 2023 than what the Market had expected.
[/quote]
<ibid>
Forget this already, Tommy? Maybe you can buy *one* cup of Starbucks coffee
from your TQQQ dividend to try to jog your memory?
Sorry, but that stream of bullshit NEVER called a bottom. I am thinking of an actual date. Anybody can look back AFTER the market has bottom and call it.
As I said, I don't know when the bottom will occur, but I can dollar cost average into near the bottom and do just fine on the long haul.
Tommy wrote:
Note that the Lyin' Asshole NEVER said how much he made off ofThe ONLY "Lyin' Asshole" on this group is the one who uses the term
ARNA!!!!
most often; like the ulimate in projection.
I note how often you avoid any direct questions and only give infantile responses, you senile old fart, Betty.
You are always running and hiding, pussy.
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 1:20:53 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 8:26:34 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 9:01:49 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 2:22:02 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
Notice that the Lyin' Asshole said NOTHING about when the market will bottom -
I didn't expect him to (in fact I EXPECTED him to DODGE the question!).
Except it was previously addressed in this thread nine days ago, on 29 Dec 22,
which quoted how you were told this over a month ago, on 18 Nov 22: [quote]
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not
current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
Except for Black Swans/etc, of course. But your attempted point was already
acknowledged above, “… under downward pressure so long as the Fed is raising interest rates.”, as this was why I flatly asked you:
“So then: are you claiming that Fed rate hikes are already over?”
And of course you were silent on that question. How brave of you.
The dilemma you have is that just which hike is the “last” rate hike ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ often isn’t known when it happens, but is decided some time thereafter ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ retrospectively. That’s why investor opinions vary on if market inflection
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
should be expected at {0, 3, 4, 6, etc} months prior to said “last”. Of course,
there’s also strategies on how to address this uncertainty factor too…
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/_1pDlBNKtJk/m/DuyPAcdUAAAJ>
and
[quote]
"... it seems evident to me that the bear market rallies which were starting to
anticipate a bottom were premature, so we're likely in for continued Fed rate
hikes for longer into 2023 than what the Market had expected.
[/quote]
<ibid>
Forget this already, Tommy? Maybe you can buy *one* cup of Starbucks coffee
from your TQQQ dividend to try to jog your memory?
Sorry, but that stream of bullshit NEVER called a bottom. I am thinking of an actual date. Anybody can look back AFTER the market has bottom and call it.You’re merely repeating back precisely what I just told you.
And when you claimed you weren’t already told this, lying.
As I said, I don't know when the bottom will occur, but I can dollar cost average into near the bottom and do just fine on the long haul.Which notes that you’ve started (at TQQQ =$22/share), then you’ve committed
to believing in a market timeline that will return to positive before you will need
those funds. Time will tell if you moved in too early, but what’s already apparent
is that my own positioning is at least 20% better than yours .. despite how you
constantly try to claim that you’re the RSG financial whiz. To invoke cost averaging
now is to try to whistle past the graveyard of your own egotistical bluster.
-hh
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 6:15:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 1:20:53 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 8:26:34 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 9:01:49 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 2:22:02 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
Notice that the Lyin' Asshole said NOTHING about when the market will bottom -
I didn't expect him to (in fact I EXPECTED him to DODGE the question!).
Except it was previously addressed in this thread nine days ago, on 29 Dec 22,
which quoted how you were told this over a month ago, on 18 Nov 22: [quote]
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not
current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
Except for Black Swans/etc, of course. But your attempted point was already
acknowledged above, “… under downward pressure so long as the Fed is
raising interest rates.”, as this was why I flatly asked you:
“So then: are you claiming that Fed rate hikes are already over?”
And of course you were silent on that question. How brave of you.
The dilemma you have is that just which hike is the “last” rate hike
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ often isn’t known when it happens, but is decided some time thereafter
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ retrospectively. That’s why investor opinions vary on if market inflection
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
should be expected at {0, 3, 4, 6, etc} months prior to said “last”. Of course,
there’s also strategies on how to address this uncertainty factor too…
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/_1pDlBNKtJk/m/DuyPAcdUAAAJ>
and
[quote]
"... it seems evident to me that the bear market rallies which were starting to
anticipate a bottom were premature, so we're likely in for continued Fed rate
hikes for longer into 2023 than what the Market had expected.
[/quote]
<ibid>
Forget this already, Tommy? Maybe you can buy *one* cup of Starbucks coffee
from your TQQQ dividend to try to jog your memory?
Sorry, but that stream of bullshit NEVER called a bottom. I am thinking ofYou’re merely repeating back precisely what I just told you.
an actual date. Anybody can look back AFTER the market has bottom and call it.
And when you claimed you weren’t already told this, lying.
As I said, I don't know when the bottom will occur, but I can dollar costWhich notes that you’ve started (at TQQQ =$22/share), then you’ve committed
average into near the bottom and do just fine on the long haul.
to believing in a market timeline that will return to positive before you will need
those funds. Time will tell if you moved in too early, but what’s already apparent
is that my own positioning is at least 20% better than yours .. despite how you
constantly try to claim that you’re the RSG financial whiz. To invoke cost averaging
now is to try to whistle past the graveyard of your own egotistical bluster.
Well, Lyin' Asshole, we will NEVER know what your "timeline" is because you NEVER
make any definitive trades, hypothetical or real.
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
The bottom line is nobody can pick the exact day it will bottom, …
but if you wait you will NEVER benefit from a turnaround. One proven strategy is just to dollar cost average into a major market index. Then
you don't worry about picking a particular time to invest.
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 7:18:18 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 6:15:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 1:20:53 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 8:26:34 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 9:01:49 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 2:22:02 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
Notice that the Lyin' Asshole said NOTHING about when the market will bottom -
I didn't expect him to (in fact I EXPECTED him to DODGE the question!).
Except it was previously addressed in this thread nine days ago, on 29 Dec 22,
which quoted how you were told this over a month ago, on 18 Nov 22: [quote]
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not
current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
Except for Black Swans/etc, of course. But your attempted point was already
acknowledged above, “… under downward pressure so long as the Fed is
raising interest rates.”, as this was why I flatly asked you:
“So then: are you claiming that Fed rate hikes are already over?”
And of course you were silent on that question. How brave of you.
The dilemma you have is that just which hike is the “last” rate hike
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
often isn’t known when it happens, but is decided some time thereafter
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
retrospectively. That’s why investor opinions vary on if market inflection
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
should be expected at {0, 3, 4, 6, etc} months prior to said “last”. Of course,
there’s also strategies on how to address this uncertainty factor too…
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/_1pDlBNKtJk/m/DuyPAcdUAAAJ>
and
[quote]
"... it seems evident to me that the bear market rallies which were starting to
anticipate a bottom were premature, so we're likely in for continued Fed rate
hikes for longer into 2023 than what the Market had expected. [/quote]
<ibid>
Forget this already, Tommy? Maybe you can buy *one* cup of Starbucks coffee
from your TQQQ dividend to try to jog your memory?
Sorry, but that stream of bullshit NEVER called a bottom. I am thinking ofYou’re merely repeating back precisely what I just told you.
an actual date. Anybody can look back AFTER the market has bottom and call it.
And when you claimed you weren’t already told this, lying.
As I said, I don't know when the bottom will occur, but I can dollar costWhich notes that you’ve started (at TQQQ =$22/share), then you’ve committed
average into near the bottom and do just fine on the long haul.
to believing in a market timeline that will return to positive before you will need
those funds. Time will tell if you moved in too early, but what’s already apparent
is that my own positioning is at least 20% better than yours .. despite how you
constantly try to claim that you’re the RSG financial whiz. To invoke cost averaging
now is to try to whistle past the graveyard of your own egotistical bluster.
Well, Lyin' Asshole, we will NEVER know what your "timeline" is because you NEVERFunny how between the two of us, I’m the only one who’s actually posted any brokerage
make any definitive trades, hypothetical or real.
statements.
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
The bottom line is nobody can pick the exact day it will bottom, …
That’s what I said … and which you tried to dispute.
but if you wait you will NEVER benefit from a turnaround. One proven strategy is just to dollar cost average into a major market index. Then you don't worry about picking a particular time to invest.Oh, so then all those nasty things you’d previously said about “catching falling knives” now no longer apply?
-hh
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 7:40:10 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 7:18:18 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 6:15:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 1:20:53 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 8:26:34 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 9:01:49 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 2:22:02 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
Notice that the Lyin' Asshole said NOTHING about when the market will bottom -
I didn't expect him to (in fact I EXPECTED him to DODGE the question!).
Except it was previously addressed in this thread nine days ago, on 29 Dec 22,
which quoted how you were told this over a month ago, on 18 Nov 22:
[quote]
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not
current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
Except for Black Swans/etc, of course. But your attempted point was already
acknowledged above, “… under downward pressure so long as the Fed is
raising interest rates.”, as this was why I flatly asked you:
“So then: are you claiming that Fed rate hikes are already over?”
And of course you were silent on that question. How brave of you.
The dilemma you have is that just which hike is the “last” rate hike
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
often isn’t known when it happens, but is decided some time thereafter
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
retrospectively. That’s why investor opinions vary on if market inflection
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
should be expected at {0, 3, 4, 6, etc} months prior to said “last”. Of course,
there’s also strategies on how to address this uncertainty factor too…
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/_1pDlBNKtJk/m/DuyPAcdUAAAJ>
and
[quote]
"... it seems evident to me that the bear market rallies which were starting to
anticipate a bottom were premature, so we're likely in for continued Fed rate
hikes for longer into 2023 than what the Market had expected. [/quote]
<ibid>
Forget this already, Tommy? Maybe you can buy *one* cup of Starbucks coffee
from your TQQQ dividend to try to jog your memory?
Sorry, but that stream of bullshit NEVER called a bottom. I am thinking ofYou’re merely repeating back precisely what I just told you.
an actual date. Anybody can look back AFTER the market has bottom and call it.
And when you claimed you weren’t already told this, lying.
As I said, I don't know when the bottom will occur, but I can dollar costWhich notes that you’ve started (at TQQQ =$22/share), then you’ve committed
average into near the bottom and do just fine on the long haul.
to believing in a market timeline that will return to positive before you will need
those funds. Time will tell if you moved in too early, but what’s already apparent
is that my own positioning is at least 20% better than yours .. despite how you
constantly try to claim that you’re the RSG financial whiz. To invoke cost averaging
now is to try to whistle past the graveyard of your own egotistical bluster.
Well, Lyin' Asshole, we will NEVER know what your "timeline" is because you NEVERFunny how between the two of us, I’m the only one who’s actually posted any brokerage
make any definitive trades, hypothetical or real.
statements.
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
The bottom line is nobody can pick the exact day it will bottom, …
That’s what I said … and which you tried to dispute.
Not in those terms.
but if you wait you will NEVER benefit from a turnaround. One proven strategy is just to dollar cost average into a major market index. Then you don't worry about picking a particular time to invest.
Oh, so then all those nasty things you’d previously said about “catching
falling knives” now no longer apply?
A market index IS NOT a "falling knife," BBBY is.
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:16:55 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 7:40:10 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 7:18:18 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 6:15:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 1:20:53 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 8:26:34 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 9:01:49 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 2:22:02 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
Notice that the Lyin' Asshole said NOTHING about when the market will bottom -
I didn't expect him to (in fact I EXPECTED him to DODGE the question!).
Except it was previously addressed in this thread nine days ago, on 29 Dec 22,
which quoted how you were told this over a month ago, on 18 Nov 22:
[quote]
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not
current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
Except for Black Swans/etc, of course. But your attempted point was already
acknowledged above, “… under downward pressure so long as the Fed is
raising interest rates.”, as this was why I flatly asked you:
“So then: are you claiming that Fed rate hikes are already over?”
And of course you were silent on that question. How brave of you.
The dilemma you have is that just which hike is the “last” rate hike
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
often isn’t known when it happens, but is decided some time thereafter
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
retrospectively. That’s why investor opinions vary on if market inflection
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
should be expected at {0, 3, 4, 6, etc} months prior to said “last”. Of course,
there’s also strategies on how to address this uncertainty factor too…
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/_1pDlBNKtJk/m/DuyPAcdUAAAJ>
and
[quote]
"... it seems evident to me that the bear market rallies which were starting to
anticipate a bottom were premature, so we're likely in for continued Fed rate
hikes for longer into 2023 than what the Market had expected. [/quote]
<ibid>
Forget this already, Tommy? Maybe you can buy *one* cup of Starbucks coffee
from your TQQQ dividend to try to jog your memory?
Sorry, but that stream of bullshit NEVER called a bottom. I am thinking ofYou’re merely repeating back precisely what I just told you.
an actual date. Anybody can look back AFTER the market has bottom and call it.
And when you claimed you weren’t already told this, lying.
As I said, I don't know when the bottom will occur, but I can dollar costWhich notes that you’ve started (at TQQQ =$22/share), then you’ve committed
average into near the bottom and do just fine on the long haul.
to believing in a market timeline that will return to positive before you will need
those funds. Time will tell if you moved in too early, but what’s already apparent
is that my own positioning is at least 20% better than yours .. despite how you
constantly try to claim that you’re the RSG financial whiz. To invoke cost averaging
now is to try to whistle past the graveyard of your own egotistical bluster.
Well, Lyin' Asshole, we will NEVER know what your "timeline" is because you NEVER
make any definitive trades, hypothetical or real.
Funny how between the two of us, I’m the only one who’s actually posted any brokerage
statements.
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
The bottom line is nobody can pick the exact day it will bottom, …
That’s what I said … and which you tried to dispute.
Not in those terms.But of course you didn't quote me, because you were trying to claim that you said it first.
but if you wait you will NEVER benefit from a turnaround. One proven strategy is just to dollar cost average into a major market index. Then
you don't worry about picking a particular time to invest.
Oh, so then all those nasty things you’d previously said about “catching
falling knives” now no longer apply?
A market index IS NOT a "falling knife," BBBY is.There is no requirement that the equity must be an individual stock: it is that the fund
is rapidly falling in value (the rule of thumb is -10%).
Case in point, back on 25 Sept 2019 you said of ARNA: "This stock qualifies for the
"falling knife" award!!!!!" ... but why did you claim that ARNA was a dangerous "falling knife"
from a -6% fall, while you didn't consider ALXX's -11% fall ... nor TQQQ's -25% fall in
just 2 weeks last month (from $22 to $16.2) either. Gosh, sounds to be very inconsistent
and situational, namely, Tommy doing a hypocritical "do as I say, not as I do".
-hh
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:19:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:16:55 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 7:40:10 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 7:18:18 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 6:15:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 1:20:53 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 8:26:34 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 9:01:49 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 2:22:02 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 6:53:08 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
…
Case in point, if you hadn't been so over-anxious (as you often are), you could have held off
on your TQQQ position a little longer & now be 20% better positioned than you currently are.
Meantime,…
…meantime, Tommy can brag about how he made the ex-dividend date, so he just got a big
old payment from his TQQQ. But…think it’s enough to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks?
Notice that the Lyin' Asshole said NOTHING about when the market will bottom -
I didn't expect him to (in fact I EXPECTED him to DODGE the question!).
Except it was previously addressed in this thread nine days ago, on 29 Dec 22,
which quoted how you were told this over a month ago, on 18 Nov 22:
[quote]
Note that the stock market is based on what will happen in the FUTURE, not
current conditions, so the market will turn around BEFORE the economy does.
Except for Black Swans/etc, of course. But your attempted point was already
acknowledged above, “… under downward pressure so long as the Fed is
raising interest rates.”, as this was why I flatly asked you:
“So then: are you claiming that Fed rate hikes are already over?”
And of course you were silent on that question. How brave of you.
The dilemma you have is that just which hike is the “last” rate hike
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
often isn’t known when it happens, but is decided some time thereafter
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
retrospectively. That’s why investor opinions vary on if market inflection
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
should be expected at {0, 3, 4, 6, etc} months prior to said “last”. Of course,
there’s also strategies on how to address this uncertainty factor too…
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/_1pDlBNKtJk/m/DuyPAcdUAAAJ>
and
[quote]
"... it seems evident to me that the bear market rallies which were starting to
anticipate a bottom were premature, so we're likely in for continued Fed rate
hikes for longer into 2023 than what the Market had expected. [/quote]
<ibid>
Forget this already, Tommy? Maybe you can buy *one* cup of Starbucks coffee
from your TQQQ dividend to try to jog your memory?
Sorry, but that stream of bullshit NEVER called a bottom. I am thinking ofYou’re merely repeating back precisely what I just told you.
an actual date. Anybody can look back AFTER the market has bottom and call it.
And when you claimed you weren’t already told this, lying.
As I said, I don't know when the bottom will occur, but I can dollar costWhich notes that you’ve started (at TQQQ =$22/share), then you’ve committed
average into near the bottom and do just fine on the long haul.
to believing in a market timeline that will return to positive before you will need
those funds. Time will tell if you moved in too early, but what’s already apparent
is that my own positioning is at least 20% better than yours .. despite how you
constantly try to claim that you’re the RSG financial whiz. To invoke cost averaging
now is to try to whistle past the graveyard of your own egotistical bluster.
Well, Lyin' Asshole, we will NEVER know what your "timeline" is because you NEVER
make any definitive trades, hypothetical or real.
Funny how between the two of us, I’m the only one who’s actually posted any brokerage
statements.
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
Oh, look what Tommy “missed” clarifying.Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
Plus there’s also this:
“Top Chicago Economists Expect Interest Rates to Peak Around 5.5%
* Fed will keep rates higher for longer to control inflation
* Loss of credibility in the 1970s led to double-digit rates”
< https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-10/top-chicago-economists-expect-interest-rates-to-peak-around-5-5>
For point of clarification, if the Fed sticks to 50 basis points per hike announcement, the two meetings in 1Q23 (Jan 31-Feb 1; Mar 21-22)
gets from 4.3% to 5.3%, so this expectation of 5.5% requires at least one more hike in May 2-3, which is unequivocally well into 2Q23, particularly with this statement of “higher for longer” for credibility. Time will tell,
including when the Market believes the hikes are really ending, to bottom.
The bottom line is nobody can pick the exact day it will bottom, …
That’s what I said … and which you tried to dispute.
Not in those terms.But of course you didn't quote me, because you were trying to claim that you said it first.
but if you wait you will NEVER benefit from a turnaround. One proven strategy is just to dollar cost average into a major market index. Then
you don't worry about picking a particular time to invest.
Oh, so then all those nasty things you’d previously said about “catching
falling knives” now no longer apply?
A market index IS NOT a "falling knife," BBBY is.There is no requirement that the equity must be an individual stock: it is that the fund
is rapidly falling in value (the rule of thumb is -10%).
Case in point, back on 25 Sept 2019 you said of ARNA: "This stock qualifies for the
"falling knife" award!!!!!" ... but why did you claim that ARNA was a dangerous "falling knife"
from a -6% fall, while you didn't consider ALXX's -11% fall ... nor TQQQ's -25% fall in
just 2 weeks last month (from $22 to $16.2) either. Gosh, sounds to be very inconsistent
and situational, namely, Tommy doing a hypocritical "do as I say, not as I do".
-hh-hh
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 6:41:22 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:19:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:16:55 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
…
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
Oh, look what Tommy “missed” clarifying.
Plus there’s also this:
“Top Chicago Economists Expect Interest Rates to Peak Around 5.5%
* Fed will keep rates higher for longer to control inflation
* Loss of credibility in the 1970s led to double-digit rates”
< https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-10/top-chicago-economists-expect-interest-rates-to-peak-around-5-5>
For point of clarification, if the Fed sticks to 50 basis points per hike announcement, the two meetings in 1Q23 (Jan 31-Feb 1; Mar 21-22)
gets from 4.3% to 5.3%, so this expectation of 5.5% requires at least one more hike in May 2-3, which is unequivocally well into 2Q23, particularly with this statement of “higher for longer” for credibility. Time will tell,
including when the Market believes the hikes are really ending, to bottom.
Sounds like MORE bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole in place of answering
the question: WHEN will the market bottom (i.e. a date)?
On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 12:44:40 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 6:41:22 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:19:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:16:55 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
…
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
Oh, look what Tommy “missed” clarifying.
Plus there’s also this:
“Top Chicago Economists Expect Interest Rates to Peak Around 5.5%
* Fed will keep rates higher for longer to control inflation
* Loss of credibility in the 1970s led to double-digit rates”
< https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-10/top-chicago-economists-expect-interest-rates-to-peak-around-5-5>
And in this past week’s meeting, another 0.25% quarter point rate hike by the Federal Reserve.. gosh, it’s almost as if someone not named Tommy called that one four months ago!For point of clarification, if the Fed sticks to 50 basis points per hike
announcement, the two meetings in 1Q23 (Jan 31-Feb 1; Mar 21-22)
gets from 4.3% to 5.3%, so this expectation of 5.5% requires at least one
more hike in May 2-3, which is unequivocally well into 2Q23, particularly
with this statement of “higher for longer” for credibility. Time will tell,
including when the Market believes the hikes are really ending, to bottom.
Sounds like MORE bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole in place of answeringSince conventional wisdom is +N months after the last rate hike, this week’s rate hike indicates “not yet”. So much for Tommy’s “bottoming out”
the question: WHEN will the market bottom (i.e. a date)?
in 1Q claim from January … while my 3Q, maybe 4Q is still holding.
-hh
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 5:51:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 12:44:40 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 6:41:22 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:19:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:16:55 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
…
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
Oh, look what Tommy “missed” clarifying.
Plus there’s also this:
“Top Chicago Economists Expect Interest Rates to Peak Around 5.5%
* Fed will keep rates higher for longer to control inflation
* Loss of credibility in the 1970s led to double-digit rates”
< https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-10/top-chicago-economists-expect-interest-rates-to-peak-around-5-5>
And in this past week’s meeting, another 0.25% quarter point rate hike byFor point of clarification, if the Fed sticks to 50 basis points per hike
announcement, the two meetings in 1Q23 (Jan 31-Feb 1; Mar 21-22)
gets from 4.3% to 5.3%, so this expectation of 5.5% requires at least one
more hike in May 2-3, which is unequivocally well into 2Q23, particularly
with this statement of “higher for longer” for credibility. Time will tell,
including when the Market believes the hikes are really ending, to bottom.
the Federal Reserve.. gosh, it’s almost as if someone not named Tommy called that one four months ago!
Sounds like MORE bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole in place of answering the question: WHEN will the market bottom (i.e. a date)?Since conventional wisdom is +N months after the last rate hike, this week’s rate hike indicates “not yet”. So much for Tommy’s “bottoming out”
in 1Q claim from January … while my 3Q, maybe 4Q is still holding.
-hhLOL! Note: you STILL didn't answer the question: WHEN will the market bottom out.
And unless the market drops significantly below the Q1 lows, then my prediction is accurate. Let it be known that I actually made a prediction
..
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 8:00:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:11:08 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 5:51:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 12:44:40 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 6:41:22 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:19:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:16:55 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
…
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
Oh, look what Tommy “missed” clarifying.
Plus there’s also this:
“Top Chicago Economists Expect Interest Rates to Peak Around 5.5%
* Fed will keep rates higher for longer to control inflation
* Loss of credibility in the 1970s led to double-digit rates”
< https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-10/top-chicago-economists-expect-interest-rates-to-peak-around-5-5>
And in this past week’s meeting, another 0.25% quarter point rate hike byFor point of clarification, if the Fed sticks to 50 basis points per hike
announcement, the two meetings in 1Q23 (Jan 31-Feb 1; Mar 21-22) gets from 4.3% to 5.3%, so this expectation of 5.5% requires at least one
more hike in May 2-3, which is unequivocally well into 2Q23, particularly
with this statement of “higher for longer” for credibility. Time will tell,
including when the Market believes the hikes are really ending, to bottom.
the Federal Reserve.. gosh, it’s almost as if someone not named Tommy
called that one four months ago!
Sounds like MORE bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole in place of answeringSince conventional wisdom is +N months after the last rate hike, this week’s rate hike indicates “not yet”. So much for Tommy’s “bottoming out”
the question: WHEN will the market bottom (i.e. a date)?
in 1Q claim from January … while my 3Q, maybe 4Q is still holding.
False, that was already discussed & noted as not knowable in advance:-hhLOL! Note: you STILL didn't answer the question: WHEN will the market bottom out.
all we have are general historical patterns as guidance.
And unless the market drops significantly below the Q1 lows, then my prediction is accurate. Let it be known that I actually made a prediction
..
Which was that the market dropped after you made your ‘now’ claim…right ?
Translation: "I don't know SHIT!"
I, OTOH, have consistently maintained that, since you can't pick the bottom, to dollar cost average into the market.
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut down completely:
On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 1:05:44 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 8:00:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:11:08 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 5:51:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 12:44:40 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 6:41:22 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:19:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:16:55 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
…
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
Oh, look what Tommy “missed” clarifying.
Plus there’s also this:
“Top Chicago Economists Expect Interest Rates to Peak Around 5.5%
* Fed will keep rates higher for longer to control inflation
* Loss of credibility in the 1970s led to double-digit rates”
< https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-10/top-chicago-economists-expect-interest-rates-to-peak-around-5-5>
And in this past week’s meeting, another 0.25% quarter point rate hike byFor point of clarification, if the Fed sticks to 50 basis points per hike
announcement, the two meetings in 1Q23 (Jan 31-Feb 1; Mar 21-22) gets from 4.3% to 5.3%, so this expectation of 5.5% requires at least one
more hike in May 2-3, which is unequivocally well into 2Q23, particularly
with this statement of “higher for longer” for credibility. Time will tell,
including when the Market believes the hikes are really ending, to bottom.
the Federal Reserve.. gosh, it’s almost as if someone not named Tommy
called that one four months ago!
Sounds like MORE bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole in place of answeringSince conventional wisdom is +N months after the last rate hike, this
the question: WHEN will the market bottom (i.e. a date)?
week’s rate hike indicates “not yet”. So much for Tommy’s “bottoming out”
in 1Q claim from January … while my 3Q, maybe 4Q is still holding.
False, that was already discussed & noted as not knowable in advance: all we have are general historical patterns as guidance.-hhLOL! Note: you STILL didn't answer the question: WHEN will the market bottom out.
And unless the market drops significantly below the Q1 lows, then my prediction is accurate. Let it be known that I actually made a prediction
..
Which was that the market dropped after you made your ‘now’ claim…right ?
Translation: "I don't know SHIT!"Oh, we’ve known for quite awhile that you don’t know shit, Tommy.
I, OTOH, have consistently maintained that, since you can't pick the bottom,Nothing wrong with DCA in principle, but that isn’t disputing what was said.
to dollar cost average into the market.
Point being that you’ve already “called bottom”.
In the meantime…
< https://www.marketwatch.com/story/short-sellers-are-more-bearish-than-theyve-been-in-a-long-time-79d7c416>
…shorts are approaching what they were in Fall 2007 & March 2020. As such, history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was -30%). Still
feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago, especially since that was
before, not after, not one, not two, but three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut down completely:So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV companies are going to fail?
-hh
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was
-30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after, not one, not two, but
three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shutSo? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV
down completely:
companies are going to fail?
-hh
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew
that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has
occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is your
phony trade.
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they ALL
took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just these
small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is
down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you
libtards blew.
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was
-30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after, not one, not two, but
three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut
down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV
companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew
that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has
occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is your
phony trade.
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they ALL
took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just these
small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is
down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
Startups fail.
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
On 2023-05-20 12:21, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 11:39:37 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock pricehistory tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020
was -30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four
months ago, especially since that was before, not after, not
one, not two, but three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about toSo? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV
shut down completely:
companies are going to fail?
-hh
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew
that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has
occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is
your phony trade.
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they
ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't
just these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of
415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS
of dollars that you libtards blew.
goes down, right Sunshine?
You get it that ANYONE who bought at those stratospheric prices LOSTYup.
A LOT of money, don't you Fool? And most of those were stupid
libtards who think EVs are God's solution to everything.
I also get that the companies involved didn't "take" anything.
Startups fail.
DUH! Try telling us something insightful.
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
Well, YES IT DOES, Fool.Nope.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
More WHATABOUTISM by the Fool.It's called "analogy".
You should look it up.
On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 11:39:37 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock pricehistory tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020
was -30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four
months ago, especially since that was before, not after, not
one, not two, but three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about toSo? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV
shut down completely:
companies are going to fail?
-hh
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew
that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has
occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is
your phony trade.
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they
ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't
just these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of
415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS
of dollars that you libtards blew.
goes down, right Sunshine?
You get it that ANYONE who bought at those stratospheric prices LOST
A LOT of money, don't you Fool? And most of those were stupid
libtards who think EVs are God's solution to everything.
Startups fail.
DUH! Try telling us something insightful.
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
Well, YES IT DOES, Fool.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
More WHATABOUTISM by the Fool.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was
-30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after, not one, not two, but
three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut
down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV
companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew
that.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever provided.Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has
occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is your phony trade.
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they ALL
took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is
down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock price goes down, right Sunshine?No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail.And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all EVs are bad
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
and will fail in the marketplace… despite already demonstrating some
other advantages over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak point”
< https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
to make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?None, of course! /s
-hh
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was
-30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after, not one, not two, but
three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shutSo? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV
down completely:
companies are going to fail?
-hh
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew
that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has
occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is your
phony trade.
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they ALLYou get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just these
small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is
down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards blew.
Startups fail.
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 12:25:06 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-20 12:21, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 11:39:37 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Yup.
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock pricehistory tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020
was -30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four
months ago, especially since that was before, not after, not
one, not two, but three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about toSo? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV >>>>>> companies are going to fail?
shut down completely:
-hh
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew
that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has
occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is
your phony trade.
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they
ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't
just these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of
415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS
of dollars that you libtards blew.
goes down, right Sunshine?
You get it that ANYONE who bought at those stratospheric prices LOST
A LOT of money, don't you Fool? And most of those were stupid
libtards who think EVs are God's solution to everything.
I also get that the companies involved didn't "take" anything.
Nope.
Startups fail.
DUH! Try telling us something insightful.
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
Well, YES IT DOES, Fool.
It's called "analogy".
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
More WHATABOUTISM by the Fool.
You should look it up.
No, YOU should look up "WHATABOUTISM." I am talking about Woke Stupidity, and you are the poster child for it.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was
-30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago, >> especially since that was before, not after, not one, not two, but
three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut
down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV
companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew
that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is your phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever provided.
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail.
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all EVs are bad
and will fail in the marketplace… despite already demonstrating some other advantages over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak point”
< https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
to make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't understand
business or technology and are only motivated by their FALSE WOKE
view of the world.
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this truism.
And just TRY to get your Tesla repaired: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was >> -30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago, >> especially since that was before, not after, not one, not two, but >> three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut >>> down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV >> companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is your phony trade.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever provided.
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock price goes
down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail.
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all EVs are bad
and will fail in the marketplace… despite already demonstrating some other advantages over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak point”
< https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
to make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.Only the very last line on there never having been any PC companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't understand business or technology and are only motivated by their FALSE WOKESince that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you forced to revise?
view of the world.
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off circulation to your brain.
All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this truism.Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
And just TRY to get your Tesla repaired: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaYBut since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the relevance?
-hh
On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 1:05:44 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 8:00:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:11:08 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 5:51:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 12:44:40 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 6:41:22 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:19:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:16:55 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
…
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
Oh, look what Tommy “missed” clarifying.
Plus there’s also this:
“Top Chicago Economists Expect Interest Rates to Peak Around 5.5%
* Fed will keep rates higher for longer to control inflation
* Loss of credibility in the 1970s led to double-digit rates”
< https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-10/top-chicago-economists-expect-interest-rates-to-peak-around-5-5>
And in this past week’s meeting, another 0.25% quarter point rate hike byFor point of clarification, if the Fed sticks to 50 basis points per hike
announcement, the two meetings in 1Q23 (Jan 31-Feb 1; Mar 21-22) gets from 4.3% to 5.3%, so this expectation of 5.5% requires at least one
more hike in May 2-3, which is unequivocally well into 2Q23, particularly
with this statement of “higher for longer” for credibility. Time will tell,
including when the Market believes the hikes are really ending, to bottom.
the Federal Reserve.. gosh, it’s almost as if someone not named Tommy
called that one four months ago!
Sounds like MORE bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole in place of answeringSince conventional wisdom is +N months after the last rate hike, this
the question: WHEN will the market bottom (i.e. a date)?
week’s rate hike indicates “not yet”. So much for Tommy’s “bottoming out”
in 1Q claim from January … while my 3Q, maybe 4Q is still holding.
False, that was already discussed & noted as not knowable in advance: all we have are general historical patterns as guidance.-hhLOL! Note: you STILL didn't answer the question: WHEN will the market bottom out.
And unless the market drops significantly below the Q1 lows, then my prediction is accurate. Let it be known that I actually made a prediction
..
Which was that the market dropped after you made your ‘now’ claim…right ?
Translation: "I don't know SHIT!"Oh, we’ve known for quite awhile that you don’t know shit, Tommy.
I, OTOH, have consistently maintained that, since you can't pick the bottom,Nothing wrong with DCA in principle, but that isn’t disputing what was said.
to dollar cost average into the market.
Point being that you’ve already “called bottom”.
In the meantime…
< https://www.marketwatch.com/story/short-sellers-are-more-bearish-than-theyve-been-in-a-long-time-79d7c416>
…shorts are approaching what they were in Fall 2007 & March 2020. As such, history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was -30%). Still
feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago, especially since that was
before, not after, not one, not two, but three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut down completely:So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV companies are going to fail?
-hh
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was
-30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after, not one, not two, but
three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut >>> down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV
companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is your
phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just these
small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is
down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock price goes
down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail.
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace… despite already demonstrating some other advantages over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak point”
< https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
to make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't understand business or technology and are only motivated by their FALSE WOKE
view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off circulation to your brain.Hey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS NO comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying up these EV companies
because they thought these would be the next Tesla and they were saving the world.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands for MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
And just TRY to get your Tesla repaired: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain it to a stupid libtard.
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 12:52:29 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 1:05:44 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 8:00:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:11:08 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 5:51:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 12:44:40 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 6:41:22 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 2:19:28 PM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 12:16:55 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
…
I am saying that the market is going thru a bottoming process this quarter.
Oh, so then a glacially slow recovery afterwards, because you did say it would take
up to three (3) years for Markets to return to its prior level….right?
Oh, look what Tommy “missed” clarifying.
Plus there’s also this:
“Top Chicago Economists Expect Interest Rates to Peak Around 5.5%
* Fed will keep rates higher for longer to control inflation
* Loss of credibility in the 1970s led to double-digit rates”
< https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-10/top-chicago-economists-expect-interest-rates-to-peak-around-5-5>
And in this past week’s meeting, another 0.25% quarter point rate hike byFor point of clarification, if the Fed sticks to 50 basis points per hike
announcement, the two meetings in 1Q23 (Jan 31-Feb 1; Mar 21-22)
gets from 4.3% to 5.3%, so this expectation of 5.5% requires at least one
more hike in May 2-3, which is unequivocally well into 2Q23, particularly
with this statement of “higher for longer” for credibility. Time will tell,
including when the Market believes the hikes are really ending, to bottom.
the Federal Reserve.. gosh, it’s almost as if someone not named Tommy
called that one four months ago!
Sounds like MORE bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole in place of answeringSince conventional wisdom is +N months after the last rate hike, this
the question: WHEN will the market bottom (i.e. a date)?
week’s rate hike indicates “not yet”. So much for Tommy’s “bottoming out”
in 1Q claim from January … while my 3Q, maybe 4Q is still holding.
False, that was already discussed & noted as not knowable in advance: all we have are general historical patterns as guidance.-hhLOL! Note: you STILL didn't answer the question: WHEN will the market bottom out.
And unless the market drops significantly below the Q1 lows, then my prediction is accurate. Let it be known that I actually made a prediction
..
Which was that the market dropped after you made your ‘now’ claim…right ?
Translation: "I don't know SHIT!"Oh, we’ve known for quite awhile that you don’t know shit, Tommy.
I, OTOH, have consistently maintained that, since you can't pick the bottom,Nothing wrong with DCA in principle, but that isn’t disputing what was said.
to dollar cost average into the market.
Point being that you’ve already “called bottom”.
In the meantime…
< https://www.marketwatch.com/story/short-sellers-are-more-bearish-than-theyve-been-in-a-long-time-79d7c416>
…shorts are approaching what they were in Fall 2007 & March 2020. As such,
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was -30%). Still
feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago, especially since that was
before, not after, not one, not two, but three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut down completely:So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV companies are going to fail?
-hh
LOL!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, your homework assignment is to find out HOW MANY of all of the ICE car companies survived (you can also include steam and battery powered companies as well).
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely (and 2020 was
-30%). Still feeling confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after, not one, not two, but
three additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is about to shut
down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” that all EV
companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ - all you have is your
phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever provided.
Still.Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post - they ALL
took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just these
small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is
down from 25 to 11. This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you
libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the stock price goes
down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail.
It says nothing about the underlying technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace… despite already demonstrating some
other advantages over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less breakdowns as ADAC
pegs low-voltage batteries a weak point”
< https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on to make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC companies which
have failed…but that was also tagged as sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't understand business or technology and are only motivated by their FALSE WOKE
view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested in PCs ever, because theyThat red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off circulation to your brain.Hey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS NO comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying up these EV companies
because they thought these would be the next Tesla and they were saving the world.
believed that IT was the future? Pull my other leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands for MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.Too bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the post-WW2 era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal income tax rates ~2x of today, yet
you’re still whining about paying too much instead of not enough.
All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this truism.
Silence from Tommy.Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
And just TRY to get your Tesla repaired: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain it to a stupid libtard.Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actually explain the relevance.
-hh
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely
(and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling confident that the
bottom was four months ago, especially since that was
before, not after, not one, not two, but three
additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is
about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof”
that all EV companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you
already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER
it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ -
all you have is your phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever
provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post
- they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you.
And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to
177 from a high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11.
This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards
blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the
stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all
EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace… despite
already demonstrating some other advantages over
traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested in PCsHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS NOto make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only motivated by
their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you
forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off
circulation to your brain.
comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying up
these EV companies because they thought these would be the next
Tesla and they were saving the world.
ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull my other
leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands for MAKEToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the post-WW2
AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal income tax rates
~2x of today, yet you’re still whining about paying too much
instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this
truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actually explainAnd just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain it to a
stupid libtard.
the relevance.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low maintenance
of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is vital to view that
in context. For example, I owned a F-250 Super Duty diesel pickup for
10 years until I traded it in for a new one. In that 10 years it had
to go into the shop once (ironically, when I took it in for an
appraisal!). The repair cost was under $500, so my annualized repair
costs was less than $50/yr.
Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that drove
their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting. They decided
to recharge it there, even though it had plenty of range to get back
(this speaks to range anxiety). While they waited they watched the
Internet in the car. Then, everything went BLACK! Most people don't
know that Teslas have a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this
battery dies you can't even open the doors (although you can get
out). They called Tesla roadside service and found that they would
have to wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a 150
miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it back. They
had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs) to rescue them!!
And this was for just a dead battery - AAA would have me back on the
road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely
(and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling confident that the
bottom was four months ago, especially since that was
before, not after, not one, not two, but three
additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is
about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof”
that all EV companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you
already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER
it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ -
all you have is your phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever
provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post
- they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you.
And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to
177 from a high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11.
This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards
blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the
stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all
EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace… despite
already demonstrating some other advantages over
traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested in PCsHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS NOto make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only motivated by
their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you
forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off
circulation to your brain.
comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying up
these EV companies because they thought these would be the next
Tesla and they were saving the world.
ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull my other
leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands for MAKEToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the post-WW2
AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal income tax rates
~2x of today, yet you’re still whining about paying too much
instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this
truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actually explainAnd just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain it to a
stupid libtard.
the relevance.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low maintenance
of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is vital to view that
in context. For example, I owned a F-250 Super Duty diesel pickup for
10 years until I traded it in for a new one. In that 10 years it had
to go into the shop once (ironically, when I took it in for an appraisal!). The repair cost was under $500, so my annualized repair
costs was less than $50/yr.
Riiiiiiiiight.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs just
don't have.
Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that drove
their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting. They decided
to recharge it there, even though it had plenty of range to get back
(this speaks to range anxiety). While they waited they watched the Internet in the car. Then, everything went BLACK! Most people don't
know that Teslas have a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this battery dies you can't even open the doors (although you can get
out). They called Tesla roadside service and found that they would
have to wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a 150
miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it back. They
had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs) to rescue them!!
And this was for just a dead battery - AAA would have me back on the
road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
Funny you don't produce any references...
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn't mean
EVs are impractical in principle.
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely
(and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling confident that the
bottom was four months ago, especially since that was
before, not after, not one, not two, but three
additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is
about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof”
that all EV companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you
already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER
it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ -
all you have is your phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever
provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post
- they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you.
And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to
177 from a high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11.
This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards
blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the
stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all
EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace… despite
already demonstrating some other advantages over
traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested in PCsHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS NOto make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only motivated by
their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you
forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off
circulation to your brain.
comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying up
these EV companies because they thought these would be the next
Tesla and they were saving the world.
ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull my other
leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands for MAKEToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the post-WW2
AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal income tax rates
~2x of today, yet you’re still whining about paying too much
instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this
truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actually explainAnd just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain it to a
stupid libtard.
the relevance.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low maintenanceRiiiiiiiiight.
of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is vital to view that
in context. For example, I owned a F-250 Super Duty diesel pickup for
10 years until I traded it in for a new one. In that 10 years it had
to go into the shop once (ironically, when I took it in for an appraisal!). The repair cost was under $500, so my annualized repair
costs was less than $50/yr.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs just
don't have.
Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that drove
their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting. They decided
to recharge it there, even though it had plenty of range to get back
(this speaks to range anxiety). While they waited they watched the Internet in the car. Then, everything went BLACK! Most people don't
know that Teslas have a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this battery dies you can't even open the doors (although you can get
out). They called Tesla roadside service and found that they would
have to wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a 150
miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it back. They
had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs) to rescue them!!
And this was for just a dead battery - AAA would have me back on the
road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.Funny you don't produce any references...
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn't mean
EVs are impractical in principle.
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 9:15:04 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely
(and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling confident that the
bottom was four months ago, especially since that was
before, not after, not one, not two, but three
additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is
about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof”
that all EV companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you
already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER
it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ -
all you have is your phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever >>>>>> provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post
- they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you.
And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to
177 from a high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11.
This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards
blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the
stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all
EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace… despite
already demonstrating some other advantages over
traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested in PCsHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS NOto make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only motivated by
their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you
forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off
circulation to your brain.
comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying up
these EV companies because they thought these would be the next
Tesla and they were saving the world.
ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull my other
leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands for MAKEToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the post-WW2
AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal income tax rates
~2x of today, yet you’re still whining about paying too much
instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this
truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actually explain >> the relevance.And just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain it to a
stupid libtard.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low maintenance
of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is vital to view that
in context. For example, I owned a F-250 Super Duty diesel pickup for
10 years until I traded it in for a new one. In that 10 years it had
to go into the shop once (ironically, when I took it in for an appraisal!). The repair cost was under $500, so my annualized repair costs was less than $50/yr.
Riiiiiiiiight.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs just don't have.Engine oil changes alone cost more than $50/year, even if you DIY.
Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that drove their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting. They decided
to recharge it there, even though it had plenty of range to get back (this speaks to range anxiety). While they waited they watched the Internet in the car. Then, everything went BLACK! Most people don't
know that Teslas have a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this battery dies you can't even open the doors (although you can get
out). They called Tesla roadside service and found that they would
have to wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a 150
miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it back. They
had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs) to rescue them!! And this was for just a dead battery - AAA would have me back on the road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
Funny you don't produce any references...Or RTFM, since they can be jump-started.
<https://blog.tesbros.com/jumpstart-your-12v-battery/>
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn't meanIts more of a design trade-off than flaw, and Hyundai chose to pay for a bridge circuit:
EVs are impractical in principle.
<https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a38537243/electric-cars-12-volt-batteries/>
In any event, military vehicles use higher voltages, to get away from some of the
shortcomings in 12V (IIRC, up to ~400V systems are already fielded), plus there's
been at least a ~decade of 'regular' automotive industry talking about going to 48V.
-hh
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 3:20:35 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 9:15:04 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy
wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh
wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is
likely (and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling
confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after,
not one, not two, but three additional Fed
interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn
(RIDE) is about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your
“proof” that all EV companies are going to
fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But
you already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the
bottom AFTER it has occurred. Still, I have a 30%
gain from TQQQ - all you have is your phony
trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy
has ever provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that
original post - they ALL took BILLIONS from
stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just
these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a
high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This
is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you
libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when
the stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that
all EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace…
despite already demonstrating some other advantages
over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Engine oil changes alone cost more than $50/year, even if you DIY.Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested inHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There ISto make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and
gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only
motivated by their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise
are you forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has
cut off circulation to your brain.
NO comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying
up these EV companies because they thought these would
be the next Tesla and they were saving the world.
PCs ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull
my other leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands forToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
post-WW2 era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal
income tax rates ~2x of today, yet you’re still whining
about paying too much instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from
this truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actuallyAnd just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain
it to a stupid libtard.
explain the relevance.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low
maintenance of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is
vital to view that in context. For example, I owned a F-250
Super Duty diesel pickup for 10 years until I traded it in for
a new one. In that 10 years it had to go into the shop once
(ironically, when I took it in for an appraisal!). The repair
cost was under $500, so my annualized repair costs was less
than $50/yr.
Riiiiiiiiight.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs
just don't have.
Or RTFM, since they can be jump-started.Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that
drove their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting.
They decided to recharge it there, even though it had plenty
of range to get back (this speaks to range anxiety). While
they waited they watched the Internet in the car. Then,
everything went BLACK! Most people don't know that Teslas have
a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this battery dies you
can't even open the doors (although you can get out). They
called Tesla roadside service and found that they would have to
wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a
150 miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it
back. They had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs)
to rescue them!! And this was for just a dead battery - AAA
would have me back on the road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
Funny you don't produce any references...
<https://blog.tesbros.com/jumpstart-your-12v-battery/>
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn'tIts more of a design trade-off than flaw, and Hyundai chose to pay
mean EVs are impractical in principle.
for a bridge circuit:
<https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a38537243/electric-cars-12-volt-batteries/>
In any event, military vehicles use higher voltages, to get away
from some of the
shortcomings in 12V (IIRC, up to ~400V systems are already
fielded), plus there's been at least a ~decade of 'regular'
automotive industry talking about going to 48V.
-hh
What do you know, a libtard that can actually do basic research!
The basic problem is that you're average libtard is TOTALLY DEVIOD
of any normal troubleshooting skills, so when the battery dies they
call 911 (or Tesla roadside assistance,
as I detailed in this
incident). This is typical of our educational system today - no
practical application content. In grade school I had two years of
shop; this is non-existent today. I attended a technical high school
in Portland (Benson Polytechnic) where I go exposure to: 1. Metal
working 2. Welding 3. Automotive 4. Pattern making (do you even know
what a pattern is?) 5. Foundry 6. Electrical I spent my last two
years in electronics where I studied, built, tested and troubleshot electronic circuits. This definitely gave me an edge when I went to
college (yes, I am a college graduate with multiple degrees and a
graduate degree). Now, I am comfortable troubleshooting all of the
systems that run amok around my home. Rarely do I have to call in a
tech, but I will if necessary. I have repaired our broken down
vehicles on the road (this is MUCH less frequent these days because
the reliability is MUCH better than forty years ago).
Now adays people can't even change a flat! Of course, if you own a
Tesla there IS NO spare tire!
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 6:15:04 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely
(and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling confident that the
bottom was four months ago, especially since that was
before, not after, not one, not two, but three
additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is
about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof”
that all EV companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you
already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER
it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ -
all you have is your phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever >>>>>>>> provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post
- they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you.
And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to
177 from a high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11.
This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards
blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the
stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all
EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace… despite
already demonstrating some other advantages over
traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Riiiiiiiiight.Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested in PCsHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS NOto make future spirals even better.
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only motivated by
their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you
forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off
circulation to your brain.
comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying up
these EV companies because they thought these would be the next
Tesla and they were saving the world.
ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull my other
leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands for MAKEToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the post-WW2
AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal income tax rates
~2x of today, yet you’re still whining about paying too much
instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this
truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actually explainAnd just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain it to a
stupid libtard.
the relevance.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low maintenance
of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is vital to view that
in context. For example, I owned a F-250 Super Duty diesel pickup for
10 years until I traded it in for a new one. In that 10 years it had
to go into the shop once (ironically, when I took it in for an
appraisal!). The repair cost was under $500, so my annualized repair
costs was less than $50/yr.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs just
don't have.
Funny you don't produce any references...
Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that drove
their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting. They decided
to recharge it there, even though it had plenty of range to get back
(this speaks to range anxiety). While they waited they watched the
Internet in the car. Then, everything went BLACK! Most people don't
know that Teslas have a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this
battery dies you can't even open the doors (although you can get
out). They called Tesla roadside service and found that they would
have to wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a 150
miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it back. They
had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs) to rescue them!!
And this was for just a dead battery - AAA would have me back on the
road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn't mean
EVs are impractical in principle.
Hey Fool, LOOK IT UP!!!!!! Are you FUCKING IGNORANT???????????????????????
Apparently so, since you haven't heard of it.
On 2023-06-03 20:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 3:20:35 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on >>>>>>>>> to make future spirals even better.
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 9:15:04 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy
wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh
wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is
likely (and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling
confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after,
not one, not two, but three additional Fed
interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn
(RIDE) is about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your
“proof” that all EV companies are going to
fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But
you already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the
bottom AFTER it has occurred. Still, I have a 30%
gain from TQQQ - all you have is your phony
trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy
has ever provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that
original post - they ALL took BILLIONS from
stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just
these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a
high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This
is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you
libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when
the stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that
all EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace…
despite already demonstrating some other advantages
over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Engine oil changes alone cost more than $50/year, even if you DIY.Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested inHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS
How many personal computer companies have come and
gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only
motivated by their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise
are you forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has
cut off circulation to your brain.
NO comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying
up these EV companies because they thought these would
be the next Tesla and they were saving the world.
PCs ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull
my other leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands forToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
post-WW2 era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal
income tax rates ~2x of today, yet you’re still whining
about paying too much instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from
this truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actuallyAnd just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain
it to a stupid libtard.
explain the relevance.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low
maintenance of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is
vital to view that in context. For example, I owned a F-250
Super Duty diesel pickup for 10 years until I traded it in for
a new one. In that 10 years it had to go into the shop once
(ironically, when I took it in for an appraisal!). The repair
cost was under $500, so my annualized repair costs was less
than $50/yr.
Riiiiiiiiight.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs
just don't have.
Or RTFM, since they can be jump-started.Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that
drove their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting.
They decided to recharge it there, even though it had plenty
of range to get back (this speaks to range anxiety). While
they waited they watched the Internet in the car. Then,
everything went BLACK! Most people don't know that Teslas have
a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this battery dies you
can't even open the doors (although you can get out). They
called Tesla roadside service and found that they would have to
wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a
150 miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it
back. They had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs)
to rescue them!! And this was for just a dead battery - AAA
would have me back on the road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
Funny you don't produce any references...
<https://blog.tesbros.com/jumpstart-your-12v-battery/>
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn'tIts more of a design trade-off than flaw, and Hyundai chose to pay
mean EVs are impractical in principle.
for a bridge circuit:
<https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a38537243/electric-cars-12-volt-batteries/>
In any event, military vehicles use higher voltages, to get away
from some of the
shortcomings in 12V (IIRC, up to ~400V systems are already
fielded), plus there's been at least a ~decade of 'regular'
automotive industry talking about going to 48V.
-hh
What do you know, a libtard that can actually do basic research!
The basic problem is that you're average libtard is TOTALLY DEVIODHow is that different to them being ignorant of normal troubleshooting skills with an ICE vehicle.
of any normal troubleshooting skills, so when the battery dies they
call 911 (or Tesla roadside assistance,
Straight from the Tesla 3 owner's manual:
'Jump Starting the Low Voltage (Lead-Acid) Battery'
<https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-3567D5F4-A5F4-4323-8BE0-023D5438FFC6.html>
IOW, RTFM.
as I detailed in this
incident). This is typical of our educational system today - no
practical application content. In grade school I had two years of
shop; this is non-existent today. I attended a technical high school
in Portland (Benson Polytechnic) where I go exposure to: 1. Metal
working 2. Welding 3. Automotive 4. Pattern making (do you even know
what a pattern is?) 5. Foundry 6. Electrical I spent my last two
years in electronics where I studied, built, tested and troubleshot electronic circuits. This definitely gave me an edge when I went to college (yes, I am a college graduate with multiple degrees and a
graduate degree). Now, I am comfortable troubleshooting all of the
systems that run amok around my home. Rarely do I have to call in a
tech, but I will if necessary. I have repaired our broken down
vehicles on the road (this is MUCH less frequent these days because
the reliability is MUCH better than forty years ago).
Now adays people can't even change a flat! Of course, if you own a
Tesla there IS NO spare tire!
There's no spare for my BMW 135i either, Sunshine.
On 2023-06-03 20:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 3:20:35 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on >>>>>>>>> to make future spirals even better.
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 9:15:04 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy
wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh
wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is
likely (and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling
confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after,
not one, not two, but three additional Fed
interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn
(RIDE) is about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your
“proof” that all EV companies are going to
fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But
you already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the
bottom AFTER it has occurred. Still, I have a 30%
gain from TQQQ - all you have is your phony
trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy
has ever provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that
original post - they ALL took BILLIONS from
stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just
these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a
high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This
is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you
libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when
the stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that
all EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace…
despite already demonstrating some other advantages
over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Engine oil changes alone cost more than $50/year, even if you DIY.Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested inHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS
How many personal computer companies have come and
gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only
motivated by their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise
are you forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has
cut off circulation to your brain.
NO comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying
up these EV companies because they thought these would
be the next Tesla and they were saving the world.
PCs ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull
my other leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands forToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
post-WW2 era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal
income tax rates ~2x of today, yet you’re still whining
about paying too much instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from
this truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actuallyAnd just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain
it to a stupid libtard.
explain the relevance.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low
maintenance of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is
vital to view that in context. For example, I owned a F-250
Super Duty diesel pickup for 10 years until I traded it in for
a new one. In that 10 years it had to go into the shop once
(ironically, when I took it in for an appraisal!). The repair
cost was under $500, so my annualized repair costs was less
than $50/yr.
Riiiiiiiiight.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs
just don't have.
Or RTFM, since they can be jump-started.Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that
drove their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting.
They decided to recharge it there, even though it had plenty
of range to get back (this speaks to range anxiety). While
they waited they watched the Internet in the car. Then,
everything went BLACK! Most people don't know that Teslas have
a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this battery dies you
can't even open the doors (although you can get out). They
called Tesla roadside service and found that they would have to
wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a
150 miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it
back. They had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs)
to rescue them!! And this was for just a dead battery - AAA
would have me back on the road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
Funny you don't produce any references...
<https://blog.tesbros.com/jumpstart-your-12v-battery/>
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn'tIts more of a design trade-off than flaw, and Hyundai chose to pay
mean EVs are impractical in principle.
for a bridge circuit:
<https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a38537243/electric-cars-12-volt-batteries/>
In any event, military vehicles use higher voltages, to get away
from some of the
shortcomings in 12V (IIRC, up to ~400V systems are already
fielded), plus there's been at least a ~decade of 'regular'
automotive industry talking about going to 48V.
-hh
What do you know, a libtard that can actually do basic research!
The basic problem is that you're average libtard is TOTALLY DEVIODHow is that different to them being ignorant of normal troubleshooting skills with an ICE vehicle.
of any normal troubleshooting skills, so when the battery dies they
call 911 (or Tesla roadside assistance,
Straight from the Tesla 3 owner's manual:
'Jump Starting the Low Voltage (Lead-Acid) Battery'
<https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-3567D5F4-A5F4-4323-8BE0-023D5438FFC6.html>
IOW, RTFM.
as I detailed in this
incident). This is typical of our educational system today - no
practical application content. In grade school I had two years of
shop; this is non-existent today. I attended a technical high school
in Portland (Benson Polytechnic) where I go exposure to: 1. Metal
working 2. Welding 3. Automotive 4. Pattern making (do you even know
what a pattern is?) 5. Foundry 6. Electrical I spent my last two
years in electronics where I studied, built, tested and troubleshot electronic circuits. This definitely gave me an edge when I went to college (yes, I am a college graduate with multiple degrees and a
graduate degree). Now, I am comfortable troubleshooting all of the
systems that run amok around my home. Rarely do I have to call in a
tech, but I will if necessary. I have repaired our broken down
vehicles on the road (this is MUCH less frequent these days because
the reliability is MUCH better than forty years ago).
Now adays people can't even change a flat! Of course, if you own aThere's no spare for my BMW 135i either, Sunshine.
Tesla there IS NO spare tire!
On 2023-06-03 18:24, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 6:15:04 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Ignored, huh?
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on >>>>>>>> to make future spirals even better.
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely
(and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling confident that the >>>>>>>>>>> bottom was four months ago, especially since that was >>>>>>>>>>> before, not after, not one, not two, but three
additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is
about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” >>>>>>>>>>> that all EV companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you
already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER >>>>>>>>>> it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ -
all you have is your phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever >>>>>>>> provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post >>>>>>>>>> - they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. >>>>>>>>>> And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to >>>>>>>>>> 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. >>>>>>>>>> This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards >>>>>>>>>> blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the
stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all
EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace… despite
already demonstrating some other advantages over
traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Riiiiiiiiight.Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested in PCsHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS NO
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only motivated by
their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you >>>>>> forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off
circulation to your brain.
comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying up
these EV companies because they thought these would be the next >>>>>> Tesla and they were saving the world.
ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull my other
leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands for MAKEToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the post-WW2
AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal income tax rates >>>> ~2x of today, yet you’re still whining about paying too much
instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this
truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actually explain >>>> the relevance.And just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain it to a >>>>> stupid libtard.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low maintenance
of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is vital to view that
in context. For example, I owned a F-250 Super Duty diesel pickup for >>> 10 years until I traded it in for a new one. In that 10 years it had
to go into the shop once (ironically, when I took it in for an
appraisal!). The repair cost was under $500, so my annualized repair
costs was less than $50/yr.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs just
don't have.
Funny you don't produce any references...
Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that drove
their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting. They decided
to recharge it there, even though it had plenty of range to get back
(this speaks to range anxiety). While they waited they watched the
Internet in the car. Then, everything went BLACK! Most people don't
know that Teslas have a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this
battery dies you can't even open the doors (although you can get
out). They called Tesla roadside service and found that they would
have to wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a 150
miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it back. They
had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs) to rescue them!! >>> And this was for just a dead battery - AAA would have me back on the
road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn't mean
EVs are impractical in principle.
Hey Fool, LOOK IT UP!!!!!! Are you FUCKING IGNORANT???????????????????????
Apparently so, since you haven't heard of it.Apparently, Tesla's with a dead 12V system can be jumpstarted...
<https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-3567D5F4-A5F4-4323-8BE0-023D5438FFC6.html>
Oops.
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:09:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-06-03 18:24, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 6:15:04 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Ignored, huh?
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on >>>>>>>>>> to make future spirals even better.
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is likely >>>>>>>>>>>>> (and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling confident that the >>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom was four months ago, especially since that was >>>>>>>>>>>>> before, not after, not one, not two, but three
additional Fed interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn (RIDE) is
about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your “proof” >>>>>>>>>>>>> that all EV companies are going to fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But you
already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the bottom AFTER >>>>>>>>>>>> it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% gain from TQQQ -
all you have is your phony trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy has ever >>>>>>>>>> provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that original post >>>>>>>>>>>> - they ALL took BILLIONS from stupid libtards like you. >>>>>>>>>>>> And it isn't just these small players: Tesla is down to >>>>>>>>>>>> 177 from a high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. >>>>>>>>>>>> This is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you libtards >>>>>>>>>>>> blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when the
stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that all
EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace… despite
already demonstrating some other advantages over
traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Riiiiiiiiight.Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested in PCsHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS NO
How many personal computer companies have come and gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only motivated by
their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise are you >>>>>>>> forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has cut off >>>>>>>> circulation to your brain.
comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying up
these EV companies because they thought these would be the next >>>>>>>> Tesla and they were saving the world.
ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull my other
leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands for MAKEToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the post-WW2 >>>>>> era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal income tax rates >>>>>> ~2x of today, yet you’re still whining about paying too much
AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from this
truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actually explain >>>>>> the relevance.And just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain it to a >>>>>>> stupid libtard.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low maintenance
of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is vital to view that
in context. For example, I owned a F-250 Super Duty diesel pickup for >>>>> 10 years until I traded it in for a new one. In that 10 years it had >>>>> to go into the shop once (ironically, when I took it in for an
appraisal!). The repair cost was under $500, so my annualized repair >>>>> costs was less than $50/yr.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs just
don't have.
Apparently, Tesla's with a dead 12V system can be jumpstarted...Funny you don't produce any references...
Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that drove
their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting. They decided
to recharge it there, even though it had plenty of range to get back >>>>> (this speaks to range anxiety). While they waited they watched the
Internet in the car. Then, everything went BLACK! Most people don't
know that Teslas have a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this
battery dies you can't even open the doors (although you can get
out). They called Tesla roadside service and found that they would
have to wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put >>>>> into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a 150
miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it back. They
had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs) to rescue them!! >>>>> And this was for just a dead battery - AAA would have me back on the >>>>> road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn't mean
EVs are impractical in principle.
Hey Fool, LOOK IT UP!!!!!! Are you FUCKING IGNORANT??????????????????????? >>>
Apparently so, since you haven't heard of it.
<https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-3567D5F4-A5F4-4323-8BE0-023D5438FFC6.html>
Oops.
Not by technologically ignorant libtards.
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:13:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-06-03 20:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 3:20:35 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on >>>>>>>>>>> to make future spirals even better.
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 9:15:04 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Still.
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy
wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh
wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is
likely (and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling
confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after,
not one, not two, but three additional Fed
interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn
(RIDE) is about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your
“proof” that all EV companies are going to
fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But
you already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the
bottom AFTER it has occurred. Still, I have a 30%
gain from TQQQ - all you have is your phony
trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy
has ever provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that
original post - they ALL took BILLIONS from
stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just
these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a
high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This
is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you
libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when
the stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying
technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that
all EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace…
despite already demonstrating some other advantages
over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Engine oil changes alone cost more than $50/year, even if you DIY.Because you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested inHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS
How many personal computer companies have come and
gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC
companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as
sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't
understand business or technology and are only
motivated by their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise
are you forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has
cut off circulation to your brain.
NO comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying
up these EV companies because they thought these would
be the next Tesla and they were saving the world.
PCs ever, because they believed that IT was the future? Pull
my other leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands forToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
post-WW2 era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal
income tax rates ~2x of today, yet you’re still whining
about paying too much instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from
this truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actuallyAnd just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the
relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain
it to a stupid libtard.
explain the relevance.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low
maintenance of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is
vital to view that in context. For example, I owned a F-250
Super Duty diesel pickup for 10 years until I traded it in for
a new one. In that 10 years it had to go into the shop once
(ironically, when I took it in for an appraisal!). The repair
cost was under $500, so my annualized repair costs was less
than $50/yr.
Riiiiiiiiight.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs
just don't have.
Or RTFM, since they can be jump-started.Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative that
drove their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting.
They decided to recharge it there, even though it had plenty
of range to get back (this speaks to range anxiety). While
they waited they watched the Internet in the car. Then,
everything went BLACK! Most people don't know that Teslas have
a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this battery dies you
can't even open the doors (although you can get out). They
called Tesla roadside service and found that they would have to
wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a
150 miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it
back. They had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs)
to rescue them!! And this was for just a dead battery - AAA
would have me back on the road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
Funny you don't produce any references...
<https://blog.tesbros.com/jumpstart-your-12v-battery/>
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn'tIts more of a design trade-off than flaw, and Hyundai chose to pay
mean EVs are impractical in principle.
for a bridge circuit:
<https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a38537243/electric-cars-12-volt-batteries/>
In any event, military vehicles use higher voltages, to get away
from some of the
shortcomings in 12V (IIRC, up to ~400V systems are already
fielded), plus there's been at least a ~decade of 'regular'
automotive industry talking about going to 48V.
-hh
What do you know, a libtard that can actually do basic research!
The basic problem is that you're average libtard is TOTALLY DEVIOD
of any normal troubleshooting skills, so when the battery dies theyHow is that different to them being ignorant of normal troubleshooting
call 911 (or Tesla roadside assistance,
skills with an ICE vehicle.
Straight from the Tesla 3 owner's manual:
'Jump Starting the Low Voltage (Lead-Acid) Battery'
<https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-3567D5F4-A5F4-4323-8BE0-023D5438FFC6.html>
IOW, RTFM.
as I detailed in thisThere's no spare for my BMW 135i either, Sunshine.
incident). This is typical of our educational system today - no
practical application content. In grade school I had two years of
shop; this is non-existent today. I attended a technical high school
in Portland (Benson Polytechnic) where I go exposure to: 1. Metal
working 2. Welding 3. Automotive 4. Pattern making (do you even know
what a pattern is?) 5. Foundry 6. Electrical I spent my last two
years in electronics where I studied, built, tested and troubleshot
electronic circuits. This definitely gave me an edge when I went to
college (yes, I am a college graduate with multiple degrees and a
graduate degree). Now, I am comfortable troubleshooting all of the
systems that run amok around my home. Rarely do I have to call in a
tech, but I will if necessary. I have repaired our broken down
vehicles on the road (this is MUCH less frequent these days because
the reliability is MUCH better than forty years ago).
Now adays people can't even change a flat! Of course, if you own a
Tesla there IS NO spare tire!
And that's supposed to be a PLUS for a Tesla? I don't think so, Fool. Do you want to have a flat on HWY 50 and be stranded for DAYS?
On 2023-06-04 22:21, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:13:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Oh, and "you're" should have been "your".
On 2023-06-03 20:04, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 3:20:35 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:TL;DR: already 30% better, plus they know what they need to work on >>>>>>>>>>> to make future spirals even better.
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 9:15:04 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-06-02 17:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 5:32:47 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:14:02 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:58:07 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, Tommy
Still.wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 6:01:54 AM UTC-7, -hh
wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:37 AM UTC-4, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-05-19 23:22, Tommy wrote:
history tells us that a 10%-20% correction is
likely (and 2020 was -30%). Still feeling
confident that the bottom was four months ago,
especially since that was before, not after,
not one, not two, but three additional Fed
interest rate hikes?
Back to the ORIGINAL subject Lordstonwn
(RIDE) is about to shut down completely:
So? Is this failure of one EV company your
“proof” that all EV companies are going to
fail?
Of course I was quoting YOU, Lyin' Asshole. But
you already knew that.
Everybody will be an expert at calling the
bottom AFTER it has occurred. Still, I have a 30% >>>>>>>>>>>>> gain from TQQQ - all you have is your phony
trade.
A “phony” which had more documentation than Tommy >>>>>>>>>>> has ever provided.
Silence from Tommy. Shocking!
RIDE was one of FOUR EV companies in that
original post - they ALL took BILLIONS from
stupid libtards like you. And it isn't just
these small players: Tesla is down to 177 from a
high of 415, and Ford is down from 25 to 11. This >>>>>>>>>>>>> is many MORE BILLIONS of dollars that you
libtards blew.
You get that the company doesn't get anything when
the stock price goes down, right Sunshine?
No, Tommy doesn’t understand that.
Startups fail. It says nothing about the underlying >>>>>>>>>>>> technology.
And Tommy has failed to support his insinuation that
all EVs are bad and will fail in the marketplace…
despite already demonstrating some other advantages
over traditional ICE, such as in reliability:
“ First true EV reliability report shows 30% less
breakdowns as ADAC pegs low-voltage batteries a weak
point”
<
https://www.notebookcheck.net/First-true-EV-reliability-report-shows-30-less-breakdowns-as-ADAC-pegs-low-voltage-batteries-a-weak-point.718821.0.html>
Engine oil changes alone cost more than $50/year, even if you DIY. >>>>>> Now, a friend told me about the experience of a relative thatBecause you’re trying to claim that no one ever invested in >>>>>>> PCs ever, because they believed that IT was the future? PullHey Lyin' Asshole, your lies just KEEP ON COMING! There IS
How many personal computer companies have come and
gone?
None, of course! /s
More bullshit from the Lyin' Asshole.
Only the very last line on there never having been any PC >>>>>>>>> companies which have failed…but that was also tagged as >>>>>>>>> sarcasm.
The premise of the thread is that STUPID LIBTARDS don't >>>>>>>>>> understand business or technology and are only
motivated by their FALSE WOKE view of the world.
Since that’s been disproven, what part of your premise
are you forced to revise?
These SUCKERS are bound to be fleeced.
That red MAGA hat is a tad tight on you, Tommy: it has
cut off circulation to your brain.
NO comparison at all to
the PC industry. NONE! Stupid Woke libtards were buying
up these EV companies because they thought these would
be the next Tesla and they were saving the world.
my other leg.
BTW, I am PROUD to be a MAGA - after all, it stands forToo bad you don’t practice what you preach, because the
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
post-WW2 era of Greatness that’s inferred had top marginal
income tax rates ~2x of today, yet you’re still whining
about paying too much instead of not enough.
Silence from Tommy.All that you two are trying to do is to deflect from
this truism.
Why deflect when it’s easier to debunk?
Deflection again…Because you know that you can’t actually >>>>>>> explain the relevance.And just TRY to get your Tesla repaired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDPfjPEqaY
But since Tesla hasn’t gone out of business, what’s the >>>>>>>>> relevance?
HA HA HA HA! If you don't know it is POINTLESS to explain
it to a stupid libtard.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it was YOU who bragged about the low
maintenance of EVs. While there is some truth to that, it is
vital to view that in context. For example, I owned a F-250
Super Duty diesel pickup for 10 years until I traded it in for
a new one. In that 10 years it had to go into the shop once
(ironically, when I took it in for an appraisal!). The repair
cost was under $500, so my annualized repair costs was less
than $50/yr.
Riiiiiiiiight.
And you ignore the regular maintenance costs...
...where there are lots of systems you need to maintain that EVs
just don't have.
Or RTFM, since they can be jump-started.drove their Tesla a short distance (60 mi) for wine tasting.
They decided to recharge it there, even though it had plenty
of range to get back (this speaks to range anxiety). While
they waited they watched the Internet in the car. Then,
everything went BLACK! Most people don't know that Teslas have
a 12V battery besides the HV battery. If this battery dies you
can't even open the doors (although you can get out). They
called Tesla roadside service and found that they would have to >>>>>> wait several HOURS for service! The car couldn't even be put
into neutral. The closest Tesla service center was Spokane, a
150 miles away! And they would have to wait a WEEK to get it
back. They had to call relatives that drove TWO CARS (none EVs) >>>>>> to rescue them!! And this was for just a dead battery - AAA
would have me back on the road in an hour.
This is a WELL-KNOWN issue with Tesla's.
Funny you don't produce any references...
<https://blog.tesbros.com/jumpstart-your-12v-battery/>
...but even if that's the case, a design flaw in a Tesla doesn'tIts more of a design trade-off than flaw, and Hyundai chose to pay
mean EVs are impractical in principle.
for a bridge circuit:
<https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a38537243/electric-cars-12-volt-batteries/>
In any event, military vehicles use higher voltages, to get away
from some of the
shortcomings in 12V (IIRC, up to ~400V systems are already
fielded), plus there's been at least a ~decade of 'regular'
automotive industry talking about going to 48V.
-hh
What do you know, a libtard that can actually do basic research!
The basic problem is that you're average libtard is TOTALLY DEVIOD
No reply, Sunshine?of any normal troubleshooting skills, so when the battery dies theyHow is that different to them being ignorant of normal troubleshooting
call 911 (or Tesla roadside assistance,
skills with an ICE vehicle.
Straight from the Tesla 3 owner's manual:
'Jump Starting the Low Voltage (Lead-Acid) Battery'
<https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-3567D5F4-A5F4-4323-8BE0-023D5438FFC6.html>
Colour me shocked.
IOW, RTFM.
as I detailed in thisThere's no spare for my BMW 135i either, Sunshine.
incident). This is typical of our educational system today - no
practical application content. In grade school I had two years of
shop; this is non-existent today. I attended a technical high school
in Portland (Benson Polytechnic) where I go exposure to: 1. Metal
working 2. Welding 3. Automotive 4. Pattern making (do you even know
what a pattern is?) 5. Foundry 6. Electrical I spent my last two
years in electronics where I studied, built, tested and troubleshot
electronic circuits. This definitely gave me an edge when I went to
college (yes, I am a college graduate with multiple degrees and a
graduate degree). Now, I am comfortable troubleshooting all of the
systems that run amok around my home. Rarely do I have to call in a
tech, but I will if necessary. I have repaired our broken down
vehicles on the road (this is MUCH less frequent these days because
the reliability is MUCH better than forty years ago).
Now adays people can't even change a flat! Of course, if you own a
Tesla there IS NO spare tire!
And that's supposed to be a PLUS for a Tesla? I don't think so, Fool. Do you want to have a flat on HWY 50 and be stranded for DAYS?If you think that the only option to avoid being "stranded for DAYS" is
to have a spare tire, you are the one who is ignorant, Sunshine?
No reply, Sunshine?of any normal troubleshooting skills, so when the battery dies theyHow is that different to them being ignorant of normal troubleshooting >>>> skills with an ICE vehicle.
call 911 (or Tesla roadside assistance,
Straight from the Tesla 3 owner's manual:
'Jump Starting the Low Voltage (Lead-Acid) Battery'
<https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-3567D5F4-A5F4-4323-8BE0-023D5438FFC6.html>
Colour me shocked.
LOL! You haven't driven Hwy 50, the Loneliest Highway in the US, have you Fool?If you think that the only option to avoid being "stranded for DAYS" isIOW, RTFM.And that's supposed to be a PLUS for a Tesla? I don't think so, Fool. Do you want to have a flat on HWY 50 and be stranded for DAYS?
as I detailed in thisThere's no spare for my BMW 135i either, Sunshine.
incident). This is typical of our educational system today - no
practical application content. In grade school I had two years of
shop; this is non-existent today. I attended a technical high school >>>>> in Portland (Benson Polytechnic) where I go exposure to: 1. Metal
working 2. Welding 3. Automotive 4. Pattern making (do you even know >>>>> what a pattern is?) 5. Foundry 6. Electrical I spent my last two
years in electronics where I studied, built, tested and troubleshot
electronic circuits. This definitely gave me an edge when I went to
college (yes, I am a college graduate with multiple degrees and a
graduate degree). Now, I am comfortable troubleshooting all of the
systems that run amok around my home. Rarely do I have to call in a
tech, but I will if necessary. I have repaired our broken down
vehicles on the road (this is MUCH less frequent these days because
the reliability is MUCH better than forty years ago).
Now adays people can't even change a flat! Of course, if you own a
Tesla there IS NO spare tire!
to have a spare tire, you are the one who is ignorant, Sunshine?
Tommy wrote:
Note that the Lyin' Asshole NEVER said how much he made off ofThe ONLY "Lyin' Asshole" on this group is the one who uses the term
ARNA!!!!
most often; like the ulimate in projection.
I note how often you avoid any direct questions and only give infantile responses, you senile old fart, Betty.
You are always running and hiding, pussy.
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 2:04:53 PM UTC-8, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
Note that the Lyin' Asshole NEVER said how much he made off ofThe ONLY "Lyin' Asshole" on this group is the one who uses the term
ARNA!!!!
most often; like the ulimate in projection.
I note how often you avoid any direct questions and only give infantile responses, you senile old fart, Betty.
You are always running and hiding, pussy.
LOL! Sorry, you fucking ignorant libtard - it is FAR MORE than $20! You tell ME what you are willing to BET because I WILL MATCH IT!!
BTW, check your fucking spelling, you idiot!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 293 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 232:58:11 |
| Calls: | 6,624 |
| Files: | 12,171 |
| Messages: | 5,319,559 |
