• Re: My team won BIG on game day this week!

    From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Mar 19 13:10:21 2022
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.

    And what were the handicaps of your team members, Sunshine?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 19 12:50:11 2022
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Mar 19 13:37:46 2022
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are on).

    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?

    Were you required to use a certain number of each person's tee shots?

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Mar 19 13:38:02 2022
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are on).

    My my.

    Responded in just 6 minutes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Mar 19 13:16:51 2022
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are on).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Mar 19 15:20:05 2022
    On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied

    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.


    Were you required to use a certain number of each person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!

    So 5 then?

    How long was the hole?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Mar 19 15:17:25 2022
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:38:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are on).
    My my.

    Responded in just 6 minutes.

    LOL! Response times RIGHT AFTER I post DON'T MATTER!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Mar 19 15:15:41 2022
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied

    Were you required to use a certain number of each person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Mar 19 17:41:45 2022
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a 245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned shot on 17.

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Mar 19 17:44:14 2022
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed
    back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members,
    Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized
    between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are
    on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each person's tee
    shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a 245 yd
    drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned shot on 17.

    And you just remembered...


    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!

    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get it close
    on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Mar 19 18:08:09 2022
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed
    back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members,
    Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized
    between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are
    on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each person's tee
    shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a 245 yd
    drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get it close
    on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!

    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were.

    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using
    handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of
    scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength of
    my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the weakest
    golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the best shot are
    best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on that
    course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Mar 19 18:00:39 2022
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total (missed
    back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members,
    Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly equalized
    between teams (we don't get to select which teams we are
    on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each person's tee
    shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a 245 yd
    drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get it close
    on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Mar 25 17:16:29 2022
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total
    (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8
    birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members,
    Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly
    equalized between teams (we don't get to select which
    teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each
    person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a
    245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned
    shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get
    it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much
    (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were.

    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using
    handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of
    scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength
    of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the
    weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the
    best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on
    that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't
    answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are
    just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your
    group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a
    judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say
    this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked
    about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of
    my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri Mar 25 17:17:24 2022
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total
    (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8
    birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members,
    Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly
    equalized between teams (we don't get to select which
    teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each
    person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a
    245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned
    shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get
    it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much
    (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were.

    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using
    handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of
    scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength
    of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the
    weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the
    best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on
    that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't
    answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are
    just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to
    denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your
    group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a
    judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say
    this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY
    UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked
    about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of
    my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!

    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Mar 26 14:41:44 2022
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:17:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total
    (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8
    birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members,
    Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly
    equalized between teams (we don't get to select which
    teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each
    person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a
    245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned
    shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get
    it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much
    (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were.

    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using
    handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of
    scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength
    of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the
    weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the
    best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on
    that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't
    answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are
    just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to
    denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your
    group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a
    judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say
    this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY
    UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked
    about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of
    my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!
    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?

    LOL!

    Like he owes you an explanation. Someone that goes to the bank, counts money, and puts a video on Youtube? The ultimate tool wants an explanation?

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Old man, you are not owned anything. Oh, maybe a few laughs...at you!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Irving S on Sat Mar 26 19:55:48 2022
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 2:41:45 PM UTC-7, Irving S wrote:
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:17:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total
    (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8
    birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members,
    Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly
    equalized between teams (we don't get to select which >>>>>>>>>>> teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each
    person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a
    245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned
    shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get >>>>>> it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much >>>>> (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were.

    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using
    handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of
    scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength >>>> of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the
    weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the
    best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on
    that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't
    answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are
    just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to
    denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your
    group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a
    judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say
    this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY >>> UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked
    about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of
    my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!
    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?
    LOL!

    Like he owes you an explanation. Someone that goes to the bank, counts money, and puts a video on Youtube? The ultimate tool wants an explanation?

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Old man, you are not owned anything. Oh, maybe a few laughs...at you!

    Right.
    BTW, that shot that won us the game on the par 3 17th I repeated yesterday to beat a single-digit handicapper who put it within 5 ft. I ALMOST holed out for an ace!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Mar 26 19:56:21 2022
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:17:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total
    (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8
    birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members,
    Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly
    equalized between teams (we don't get to select which
    teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each
    person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a
    245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned
    shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get
    it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much
    (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were.

    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using
    handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of
    scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength
    of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the
    weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the
    best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on
    that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't
    answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are
    just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to
    denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your
    group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a
    judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say
    this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY
    UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked
    about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of
    my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!
    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?

    You don't DESERVE to know, you PATHETIC LOSER!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Mar 26 21:35:06 2022
    On 2022-03-26 7:55 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 2:41:45 PM UTC-7, Irving S wrote:
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:17:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total
    (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> equalized between teams (we don't get to select which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each
    person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a >>>>>>>>>> 245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned
    shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get >>>>>>>>> it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much >>>>>>>> (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were. >>>>>>>
    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using
    handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of >>>>>>> scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength >>>>>>> of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the
    weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the >>>>>>> best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on >>>>>>> that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't
    answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are
    just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to >>>>>> denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your
    group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a
    judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say >>>>>> this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY >>>>>> UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked >>>>> about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of >>>>>> my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!
    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?
    LOL!

    Like he owes you an explanation. Someone that goes to the bank, counts money, and puts a video on Youtube? The ultimate tool wants an explanation?

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Old man, you are not owned anything. Oh, maybe a few laughs...at you!

    Right.
    BTW, that shot that won us the game on the par 3 17th I repeated yesterday to beat a single-digit handicapper who put it within 5 ft. I ALMOST holed out for an ace!

    Of course you did...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Mar 26 21:34:50 2022
    On 2022-03-26 7:56 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:17:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total
    (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8
    birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members,
    Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly
    equalized between teams (we don't get to select which >>>>>>>>>>>>> teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each
    person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a
    245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned
    shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get >>>>>>>> it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much >>>>>>> (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were.

    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using
    handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of
    scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength >>>>>> of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the
    weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the
    best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on
    that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't
    answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are
    just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to
    denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your
    group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a
    judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say
    this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY >>>>> UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked
    about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of
    my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!
    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?

    You don't DESERVE to know, you PATHETIC LOSER!

    Do you realize how transparent you are?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Mar 27 14:02:05 2022
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 9:35:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-26 7:55 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 2:41:45 PM UTC-7, Irving S wrote:
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:17:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> equalized between teams (we don't get to select which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use?
    Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each
    person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a >>>>>>>>>> 245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned >>>>>>>>>> shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get >>>>>>>>> it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much >>>>>>>> (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were. >>>>>>>
    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using >>>>>>> handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of >>>>>>> scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength >>>>>>> of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the
    weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the >>>>>>> best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on >>>>>>> that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't >>>>>> answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are >>>>>> just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to >>>>>> denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your
    group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a >>>>>> judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say >>>>>> this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY >>>>>> UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked >>>>> about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of >>>>>> my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!
    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?
    LOL!

    Like he owes you an explanation. Someone that goes to the bank, counts money, and puts a video on Youtube? The ultimate tool wants an explanation?

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Old man, you are not owned anything. Oh, maybe a few laughs...at you!

    Right.
    BTW, that shot that won us the game on the par 3 17th I repeated yesterday to beat a single-digit handicapper who put it within 5 ft. I ALMOST holed out for an ace!
    Of course you did...

    What I "realize" is what a PATHETIC HUMAN BEING you are - do YOU realize it? I doubt it...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sun Mar 27 14:23:09 2022
    On 2022-03-27 2:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 9:35:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-26 7:55 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 2:41:45 PM UTC-7, Irving S wrote:
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:17:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equalized between teams (we don't get to select which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a >>>>>>>>>>>> 245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned >>>>>>>>>>>> shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get >>>>>>>>>>> it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much >>>>>>>>>> (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were. >>>>>>>>>
    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using >>>>>>>>> handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of >>>>>>>>> scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength >>>>>>>>> of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the >>>>>>>>> weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the >>>>>>>>> best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on >>>>>>>>> that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't >>>>>>>> answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are >>>>>>>> just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to >>>>>>>> denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your >>>>>>>> group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a >>>>>>>> judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say >>>>>>>> this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY >>>>>>>> UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked >>>>>>> about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of >>>>>>>> my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!
    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?
    LOL!

    Like he owes you an explanation. Someone that goes to the bank, counts money, and puts a video on Youtube? The ultimate tool wants an explanation?

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Old man, you are not owned anything. Oh, maybe a few laughs...at you!

    Right.
    BTW, that shot that won us the game on the par 3 17th I repeated yesterday to beat a single-digit handicapper who put it within 5 ft. I ALMOST holed out for an ace!
    Of course you did...

    What I "realize" is what a PATHETIC HUMAN BEING you are - do YOU realize it? I doubt it...

    I'm trying to understand why "realize" is in quotation marks.

    It's not like you're quoting something from earlier.

    Again: how long is this 17th, Sunshine, or are you too ashamed to admit
    it was a pitch-and-putt?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Mar 27 16:46:34 2022
    On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 5:23:12 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-27 2:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 9:35:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-26 7:55 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 2:41:45 PM UTC-7, Irving S wrote:
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:17:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equalized between teams (we don't get to select which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a >>>>>>>>>>>> 245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned >>>>>>>>>>>> shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get >>>>>>>>>>> it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much >>>>>>>>>> (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were. >>>>>>>>>
    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using >>>>>>>>> handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of >>>>>>>>> scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength >>>>>>>>> of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the >>>>>>>>> weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the >>>>>>>>> best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on >>>>>>>>> that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't >>>>>>>> answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are >>>>>>>> just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to >>>>>>>> denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your >>>>>>>> group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a >>>>>>>> judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say >>>>>>>> this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY >>>>>>>> UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked >>>>>>> about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of >>>>>>>> my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!
    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?
    LOL!

    Like he owes you an explanation. Someone that goes to the bank, counts money, and puts a video on Youtube? The ultimate tool wants an explanation?

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Old man, you are not owned anything. Oh, maybe a few laughs...at you! >>>
    Right.
    BTW, that shot that won us the game on the par 3 17th I repeated yesterday to beat a single-digit handicapper who put it within 5 ft. I ALMOST holed out for an ace!
    Of course you did...

    What I "realize" is what a PATHETIC HUMAN BEING you are - do YOU realize it? I doubt it...
    I'm trying to understand why "realize" is in quotation marks.

    It's not like you're quoting something from earlier.

    Again: how long is this 17th, Sunshine, or are you too ashamed to admit
    it was a pitch-and-putt?

    :-)

    The spinster is so bored he had to resort to total stupidity. He knows damn well that this was not pitch and putt, but even stupidity as this makes him feel important. Let's all take a moment and clap for this hilarious college dropout.

    Poor old man, he wants attention sooooo. How about counting some money spinster boy? A few thousand and start counting on Youtube. Why the hesitation, show us what a tool does for attention?

    LOL!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Mar 27 18:10:56 2022
    On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 2:23:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-27 2:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 9:35:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-26 7:55 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 2:41:45 PM UTC-7, Irving S wrote:
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:17:26 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-25 5:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 10:41:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 9:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 6:08:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 6:00 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:44:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:15 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:37:48 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 1:16 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 2022-03-19 12:50 p.m., TomS wrote:
    We played a scramble and took front and total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (missed back by one stroke). I made 5 of our 8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birdie putts.
    And what were the handicaps of your team members, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunshine?

    Teams are selected such that handicaps are roughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equalized between teams (we don't get to select which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> teams we are on).
    So they were all better than you.

    Got it.

    How many of your approach shots did the team use? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Varied
    You don't actually answer.

    Got it.

    Were you required to use a certain number of each >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person's tee shots?
    Yes - 4

    Did they use any of yours beyond the minimum?
    Yes, esp. the one that was 2' from the hole!
    So 5 then?
    Stop counting after we got our 4 drives in, but I did hit a >>>>>>>>>>>> 245 yd drive on 18 that we used as well as aforementioned >>>>>>>>>>>> shot on 17.
    And you just remembered...

    How long was the hole?

    LOL! Hey Fool, we were all playing the SAME COURSE!!
    I never said you weren't, Sunshine.

    But it's easier for a high-handicapper such as yourself to get >>>>>>>>>>> it close on a short hole...

    ...which it obviously was.

    What course did you say you were playing, anyway?

    :-)

    LOL! Handicaps AREN'T used on a scramble, Fool!!!! Shows how much >>>>>>>>>> (or LITTLE) you know about golf!!!!!
    Handicaps aren't used for the score, no. I never said they were. >>>>>>>>>
    But you just said that teams were "roughly equalized" by using >>>>>>>>> handicaps. I understood that, because I've organized a couple of >>>>>>>>> scrambles myself (and embarrassingly won one mostly on the strength >>>>>>>>> of my play).

    The point I was making is that you were almost certainly the >>>>>>>>> weakest golfer in your group, so your chances of pulling off the >>>>>>>>> best shot are best when its a very short hole.

    Now, what course did you play? Let's all see just how long 17 on >>>>>>>>> that course is from the white tees.

    :-)

    LOL! This is typical FOOLISHNESS by the Fool. This is why I don't >>>>>>>> answer your questions about handicaps, low rounds, etc. - you are >>>>>>>> just drooling all over yourself looking for something with which to >>>>>>>> denigrate me. You call me "certainly the weakest golfer in your >>>>>>>> group" knowing exactly NOTHING about the others. Therefore such a >>>>>>>> judgment is PURE FOOLISHNESS! You ARE a PATHETIC INDIVIDUAL. I say >>>>>>>> this that you might look in a mirror and recognize this - it is VERY >>>>>>>> UNBECOMING.
    How does any of that address the simple, reasonable questions I asked >>>>>>> about your bragging?

    What course was it?

    Is the reason you won't say that it was an executive length?

    Let us all see how impressive your shot was on 17, Sunshine.

    Bottom line: we DID win - and win BIG, primarily on the strength of >>>>>>>> my putting (but I had PLENTY of other good shots, as well).
    Now it's "primarily" on the strength of your putting is it?

    You're a high-handicapper.

    Deal with it.

    You're a BULLSHITER, Fool - DEAL WITH IT!
    You won't tell us where you played...

    ...what are you so ashamed of?
    LOL!

    Like he owes you an explanation. Someone that goes to the bank, counts money, and puts a video on Youtube? The ultimate tool wants an explanation?

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Old man, you are not owned anything. Oh, maybe a few laughs...at you! >>>
    Right.
    BTW, that shot that won us the game on the par 3 17th I repeated yesterday to beat a single-digit handicapper who put it within 5 ft. I ALMOST holed out for an ace!
    Of course you did...

    What I "realize" is what a PATHETIC HUMAN BEING you are - do YOU realize it? I doubt it...
    I'm trying to understand why "realize" is in quotation marks.

    It's not like you're quoting something from earlier.

    Again: how long is this 17th, Sunshine, or are you too ashamed to admit
    it was a pitch-and-putt?

    :-)

    Again, do you REALIZE what a pathetic human being you are? I am serious...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)