This is pretty much common sense: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
This is pretty much common sense: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trumpSo when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense...
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear...
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trumpYou should also read this:
'As a representative online sample, it does not report a probability confidence interval.'
In short, they make no promise about the accuracy of the poll.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:01 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:So when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense...
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear...
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
Hey Fool, have you EVER heard of "buyer's remorse?"
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:57 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:You should also read this:
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
'As a representative online sample, it does not report a probability
confidence interval.'
In short, they make no promise about the accuracy of the poll.
LOL! Hey Fool , ALL polls have a "margin of error!"
On 2022-03-07 8:10 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:01 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:So when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense...
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear...
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
Hey Fool, have you EVER heard of "buyer's remorse?"
Just trying to understand what passes for your logic, Sunshine.
This is pretty much common sense:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:12:17 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:10 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:01 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:So when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense...
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear... >>
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
Hey Fool, have you EVER heard of "buyer's remorse?"
Just trying to understand what passes for your logic, Sunshine.Plus poorly worded survey questions can result in responses that
don't follow what you were expecting, which invalidates the survey.
Case in point, I'm of the opinion that if Trump had been reelected that Putin would not have performed a military invasion ... BUT not because
Putin would *not* have achieved his same goal of taking over Ukraine:
Putin simply would not have needed to send in a literal invasion force.
Why? Because Trump would have handed over Ukraine to Putin without a fight.
As Napoleon once said: “let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him.”
Trump's policies and actions was doing Putin's work for him, and since
Putin was no fool, Putin wouldn't have _needed_ to have an invasion army
to accomplish his goals.
Furthermore, Ukraine would have been merely the first step: Trump was angling to abolish NATO completely, so the rest of the former USSR
eastern blok countries would have been at risk of Russian takeovers,
just as Ukraine is today.
TL;DR summary: if Trump had been elected, Ukraine still would have
been lost to Russia before 2025.
-hh
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:15:33 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:12:17 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:10 p.m., TomS wrote:Plus poorly worded survey questions can result in responses that
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:01 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:So when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense...
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear... >>>>>
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
Hey Fool, have you EVER heard of "buyer's remorse?"
Just trying to understand what passes for your logic, Sunshine.
don't follow what you were expecting, which invalidates the survey.
Case in point, I'm of the opinion that if Trump had been reelected that
Putin would not have performed a military invasion ... BUT not because
Putin would *not* have achieved his same goal of taking over Ukraine:
Putin simply would not have needed to send in a literal invasion force.
Why? Because Trump would have handed over Ukraine to Putin without a fight. >>
As Napoleon once said: “let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing >> a false movement, never interrupt him.”
Trump's policies and actions was doing Putin's work for him, and since
Putin was no fool, Putin wouldn't have _needed_ to have an invasion army
to accomplish his goals.
Furthermore, Ukraine would have been merely the first step: Trump was
angling to abolish NATO completely, so the rest of the former USSR
eastern blok countries would have been at risk of Russian takeovers,
just as Ukraine is today.
TL;DR summary: if Trump had been elected, Ukraine still would have
been lost to Russia before 2025.
-hh
You libtards consistently call polls that you don't like wrong. You stopped criticizing the Rasmussen poll when it had the HIGHEST rating for Lyin' Biden (even though it was still pretty bad).
BTW, it is spelled BLOCK, not BLOK.
On 2022-03-08 10:38 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:15:33 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:12:17 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:10 p.m., TomS wrote:Plus poorly worded survey questions can result in responses that
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:01 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:So when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense... >>>>>
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear... >>>>>
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
Hey Fool, have you EVER heard of "buyer's remorse?"
Just trying to understand what passes for your logic, Sunshine.
don't follow what you were expecting, which invalidates the survey.
Case in point, I'm of the opinion that if Trump had been reelected that >> Putin would not have performed a military invasion ... BUT not because
Putin would *not* have achieved his same goal of taking over Ukraine:
Putin simply would not have needed to send in a literal invasion force. >>
Why? Because Trump would have handed over Ukraine to Putin without a fight.
As Napoleon once said: “let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing
a false movement, never interrupt him.”
Trump's policies and actions was doing Putin's work for him, and since
Putin was no fool, Putin wouldn't have _needed_ to have an invasion army >> to accomplish his goals.
Furthermore, Ukraine would have been merely the first step: Trump was
angling to abolish NATO completely, so the rest of the former USSR
eastern blok countries would have been at risk of Russian takeovers,
just as Ukraine is today.
TL;DR summary: if Trump had been elected, Ukraine still would have
been lost to Russia before 2025.
-hh
You libtards consistently call polls that you don't like wrong. You stopped criticizing the Rasmussen poll when it had the HIGHEST rating for Lyin' Biden (even though it was still pretty bad).
BTW, it is spelled BLOCK, not BLOK.
Actually, you're wrong.
In that usage, it's normally spelled "bloc".
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trumpSo when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense...
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear...
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
On 2022-03-08 10:38 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:15:33 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:12:17 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:10 p.m., TomS wrote:Plus poorly worded survey questions can result in responses that
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:01 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:So when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense... >>>>>
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear... >>>>>
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
Hey Fool, have you EVER heard of "buyer's remorse?"
Just trying to understand what passes for your logic, Sunshine.
don't follow what you were expecting, which invalidates the survey.
Case in point, I'm of the opinion that if Trump had been reelected that >> Putin would not have performed a military invasion ... BUT not because
Putin would *not* have achieved his same goal of taking over Ukraine:
Putin simply would not have needed to send in a literal invasion force. >>
Why? Because Trump would have handed over Ukraine to Putin without a fight.
As Napoleon once said: “let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing
a false movement, never interrupt him.”
Trump's policies and actions was doing Putin's work for him, and since
Putin was no fool, Putin wouldn't have _needed_ to have an invasion army >> to accomplish his goals.
Furthermore, Ukraine would have been merely the first step: Trump was
angling to abolish NATO completely, so the rest of the former USSR
eastern blok countries would have been at risk of Russian takeovers,
just as Ukraine is today.
TL;DR summary: if Trump had been elected, Ukraine still would have
been lost to Russia before 2025.
-hh
You libtards consistently call polls that you don't like wrong. You stopped criticizing the Rasmussen poll when it had the HIGHEST rating for Lyin' Biden (even though it was still pretty bad).
BTW, it is spelled BLOCK, not BLOK.Actually, you're wrong.
In that usage, it's normally spelled "bloc".
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:42:35 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-08 10:38 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:15:33 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Actually, you're wrong.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:12:17 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:10 p.m., TomS wrote:Plus poorly worded survey questions can result in responses that
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:01 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:So when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense... >>>>>>>
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear... >>>>>>>
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
Hey Fool, have you EVER heard of "buyer's remorse?"
Just trying to understand what passes for your logic, Sunshine.
don't follow what you were expecting, which invalidates the survey.
Case in point, I'm of the opinion that if Trump had been reelected that >>>> Putin would not have performed a military invasion ... BUT not because >>>> Putin would *not* have achieved his same goal of taking over Ukraine:
Putin simply would not have needed to send in a literal invasion force. >>>>
Why? Because Trump would have handed over Ukraine to Putin without a fight.
As Napoleon once said: “let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing
a false movement, never interrupt him.”
Trump's policies and actions was doing Putin's work for him, and since >>>> Putin was no fool, Putin wouldn't have _needed_ to have an invasion army >>>> to accomplish his goals.
Furthermore, Ukraine would have been merely the first step: Trump was
angling to abolish NATO completely, so the rest of the former USSR
eastern blok countries would have been at risk of Russian takeovers,
just as Ukraine is today.
TL;DR summary: if Trump had been elected, Ukraine still would have
been lost to Russia before 2025.
-hh
You libtards consistently call polls that you don't like wrong. You stopped criticizing the Rasmussen poll when it had the HIGHEST rating for Lyin' Biden (even though it was still pretty bad).
BTW, it is spelled BLOCK, not BLOK.
In that usage, it's normally spelled "bloc".
You mean "misspelled"
On 2022-03-10 7:54 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:42:35 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-08 10:38 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:15:33 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Actually, you're wrong.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:12:17 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:10 p.m., TomS wrote:Plus poorly worded survey questions can result in responses that
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:01 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:So when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense... >>>>>>>
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear...
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
Hey Fool, have you EVER heard of "buyer's remorse?"
Just trying to understand what passes for your logic, Sunshine.
don't follow what you were expecting, which invalidates the survey. >>>>
Case in point, I'm of the opinion that if Trump had been reelected that >>>> Putin would not have performed a military invasion ... BUT not because >>>> Putin would *not* have achieved his same goal of taking over Ukraine: >>>> Putin simply would not have needed to send in a literal invasion force. >>>>
Why? Because Trump would have handed over Ukraine to Putin without a fight.
As Napoleon once said: “let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing
a false movement, never interrupt him.”
Trump's policies and actions was doing Putin's work for him, and since >>>> Putin was no fool, Putin wouldn't have _needed_ to have an invasion army
to accomplish his goals.
Furthermore, Ukraine would have been merely the first step: Trump was >>>> angling to abolish NATO completely, so the rest of the former USSR
eastern blok countries would have been at risk of Russian takeovers, >>>> just as Ukraine is today.
TL;DR summary: if Trump had been elected, Ukraine still would have
been lost to Russia before 2025.
-hh
You libtards consistently call polls that you don't like wrong. You stopped criticizing the Rasmussen poll when it had the HIGHEST rating for Lyin' Biden (even though it was still pretty bad).
BTW, it is spelled BLOCK, not BLOK.
In that usage, it's normally spelled "bloc".
You mean "misspelled"Nope.
'bloc
noun
a free-trade bloc: alliance, association, coalition, federation, confederation, league, faction, union, partnership, body, group,
grouping; ring, syndicate; concordat, entente, axis; party, camp, lobby, wing, cabal, clique, coterie, caucus.'
That's from the New Oxford American Dictionary.
Perhaps you'd prefer Merriam-Webster:
'bloc noun
\ ˈbläk \
Definition of bloc
1a: a temporary combination of parties in a legislative assembly
b: a group of legislators who act together for some common purpose irrespective of party lines
2a: a combination of persons, groups, or nations forming a unit with a common interest or purpose
a bloc of voters
b: a group of nations united by treaty or agreement for mutual support
or joint action
3: a quantity, number, or section of things dealt with as a unit : BLOCK
… seeking to buy and sell a large bloc of shares …
— Stuart Washington
Potvin's outstanding bloc of games during his rookie campaign occurred during the 1993 playoffs.
— Stan Fischler
<https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bloc?utm_campaign=sd&utm_medium=serp&utm_source=jsonld>
Don't you ever get tired of losing?
You could have just checked before posting.
On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:20:36 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-10 7:54 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 10:42:35 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope.
On 2022-03-08 10:38 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 3:15:33 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Actually, you're wrong.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:12:17 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:10 p.m., TomS wrote:Plus poorly worded survey questions can result in responses that
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:08:01 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:02 p.m., TomS wrote:
This is pretty much common sense:So when more Americans vote for Biden, that's not common sense... >>>>>>>>>
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump
...but when a bunch of folks in a survey say what you want to hear... >>>>>>>>>
...suddenly common sense is something you can count on?
Hey Fool, have you EVER heard of "buyer's remorse?"
Just trying to understand what passes for your logic, Sunshine.
don't follow what you were expecting, which invalidates the survey. >>>>>>
Case in point, I'm of the opinion that if Trump had been reelected that >>>>>> Putin would not have performed a military invasion ... BUT not because >>>>>> Putin would *not* have achieved his same goal of taking over Ukraine: >>>>>> Putin simply would not have needed to send in a literal invasion force. >>>>>>
Why? Because Trump would have handed over Ukraine to Putin without a fight.
As Napoleon once said: “let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing
a false movement, never interrupt him.”
Trump's policies and actions was doing Putin's work for him, and since >>>>>> Putin was no fool, Putin wouldn't have _needed_ to have an invasion army >>>>>> to accomplish his goals.
Furthermore, Ukraine would have been merely the first step: Trump was >>>>>> angling to abolish NATO completely, so the rest of the former USSR >>>>>> eastern blok countries would have been at risk of Russian takeovers, >>>>>> just as Ukraine is today.
TL;DR summary: if Trump had been elected, Ukraine still would have >>>>>> been lost to Russia before 2025.
-hh
You libtards consistently call polls that you don't like wrong. You stopped criticizing the Rasmussen poll when it had the HIGHEST rating for Lyin' Biden (even though it was still pretty bad).
BTW, it is spelled BLOCK, not BLOK.
In that usage, it's normally spelled "bloc".
You mean "misspelled"
'bloc
noun
a free-trade bloc: alliance, association, coalition, federation,
confederation, league, faction, union, partnership, body, group,
grouping; ring, syndicate; concordat, entente, axis; party, camp, lobby,
wing, cabal, clique, coterie, caucus.'
That's from the New Oxford American Dictionary.
Perhaps you'd prefer Merriam-Webster:
'bloc noun
\ ˈbläk \
Definition of bloc
1a: a temporary combination of parties in a legislative assembly
b: a group of legislators who act together for some common purpose
irrespective of party lines
2a: a combination of persons, groups, or nations forming a unit with a
common interest or purpose
a bloc of voters
b: a group of nations united by treaty or agreement for mutual support
or joint action
3: a quantity, number, or section of things dealt with as a unit : BLOCK
… seeking to buy and sell a large bloc of shares …
— Stuart Washington
Potvin's outstanding bloc of games during his rookie campaign occurred
during the 1993 playoffs.
— Stan Fischler
<https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bloc?utm_campaign=sd&utm_medium=serp&utm_source=jsonld>
Don't you ever get tired of losing?
You could have just checked before posting.
LOL! Don't you have better things to do with your time, like figuring out that you totally WASTED all that time you spent wearing masks, or WHO has caused your REAL INCOME to drop?
LOL! Don't you have better things to do with your time, like figuring
out that you totally WASTED all that time you spent wearing masks, or
WHO has caused your REAL INCOME to drop?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 64:10:32 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,124 |