On Saturday, February 26, 2022 at 3:22:58 PM UTC-5, "Baghdad Bob" wrote:
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19
Nothing new there that supports your claims.
If VAERS showed no or few injuries, you clowns would say it is gospel truth. But sadly, the stats do not fit your dialog. If VAERS if off by 90%, there have
been too many adverse effects and deaths.
No, we've been over this many times before:
<
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/vmH-yoMPpN0/m/MxFo77I4BgAJ> <
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/ioE2_rhje5E/m/N3idCtTTDAAJ> <
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/MRcw3Y5sem0/m/stBeMbGsAAAJ>
Keep your head in the sands...
Sorry Bob...but even if your innuendo was correct, in that the VAERS is a database
of fully causal adverse effects, the bottom line remains that vaccines are still vastly
preferred as the lower risk vs contracting CoVid. Specifically, your cite shows that
there's been a total of 24,402 deaths as per VAERS reporting, which we know from
other sources are notionally the 'risk' from 552M vaccine doses administered to date.
That's 44 per million, whereas by 3/31/21 (when vaccines became broadly available),
the USA has already had 574,174 deaths which is 1740 deaths per million, for a demonstrated ~40x higher death incidence rate.
That puts the risk benefit ratio of vaccination at 40:1 even if your claim was true (which it is not).
-hh
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)