https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/is-joe-biden-ok-concerning-video-goes-viral/ar-AA1hDWWl?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=0c8d2bc1a6c04a05b1f0ecf0de2cda87&ei=48
On 2023-10-03 22:14, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/is-joe-biden-ok-concerning-video-goes-viral/ar-AA1hDWWl?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=0c8d2bc1a6c04a05b1f0ecf0de2cda87&ei=48
No... ...even your biased sourced doesn't claim that.
Someone took a 27 second clip out of an 8:27 statement followed by questions, and at no time in that other 8 minutes did he show a single moment of "losing it".
He just took his time to answer this question:
"But are you worried that he [McCarthy] is going to be forced by fellow Republicans to back away from any deal he cuts with you?
And it's clear from context that he was just trying to choose his words wisely.
He ends with, "I'm not being facetious".
(Serious question for you, Sunshine: Do you really think Trump would
even know what that word meant?)
And then he clearly thinks that there's nothing more he needs to say on
the subject of McCarthy.
He goes on to answer the same reporter's next question without any hesitation.
There you go:
He answers the reporter's first question promptly.
She asked a follow-up (which they chose not to include in their clip),
which her question finishes at 7:31 into the full video:
<https://youtu.be/jDaDo7KiVTo?si=-MaGbmGNG1c87bmz&t=451>
...and then he started his answer 3 seconds later:
<https://youtu.be/jDaDo7KiVTo?si=8KBiyLfFX-zALEH6&t=454>
The video clip you referenced deliberately cuts the audio for the final
two seconds of the reporter's question, so they can make the hesitation
seem longer.
On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 10:11:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-10-03 22:14, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/is-joe-biden-ok-concerning-video-goes-viral/ar-AA1hDWWl?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=0c8d2bc1a6c04a05b1f0ecf0de2cda87&ei=48
No... ...even your biased sourced doesn't claim that.
Someone took a 27 second clip out of an 8:27 statement followed by
questions, and at no time in that other 8 minutes did he show a single
moment of "losing it".
He just took his time to answer this question:
"But are you worried that he [McCarthy] is going to be forced by fellow
Republicans to back away from any deal he cuts with you?
And it's clear from context that he was just trying to choose his words
wisely.
He ends with, "I'm not being facetious".
(Serious question for you, Sunshine: Do you really think Trump would
even know what that word meant?)
And then he clearly thinks that there's nothing more he needs to say on
the subject of McCarthy.
He goes on to answer the same reporter's next question without any
hesitation.
There you go:
He answers the reporter's first question promptly.
She asked a follow-up (which they chose not to include in their clip),
which her question finishes at 7:31 into the full video:
<https://youtu.be/jDaDo7KiVTo?si=-MaGbmGNG1c87bmz&t=451>
...and then he started his answer 3 seconds later:
<https://youtu.be/jDaDo7KiVTo?si=8KBiyLfFX-zALEH6&t=454>
The video clip you referenced deliberately cuts the audio for the final
two seconds of the reporter's question, so they can make the hesitation
seem longer.
LOL! At 7:56 he COMPLETELY LOSES his train of thought, COMPLETELY!
On 2023-10-05 20:26, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 10:11:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-10-03 22:14, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/is-joe-biden-ok-concerning-video-goes-viral/ar-AA1hDWWl?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=0c8d2bc1a6c04a05b1f0ecf0de2cda87&ei=48
No... ...even your biased sourced doesn't claim that.
Someone took a 27 second clip out of an 8:27 statement followed by
questions, and at no time in that other 8 minutes did he show a single
moment of "losing it".
He just took his time to answer this question:
"But are you worried that he [McCarthy] is going to be forced by fellow >> Republicans to back away from any deal he cuts with you?
And it's clear from context that he was just trying to choose his words >> wisely.
He ends with, "I'm not being facetious".
(Serious question for you, Sunshine: Do you really think Trump would
even know what that word meant?)
And then he clearly thinks that there's nothing more he needs to say on >> the subject of McCarthy.
He goes on to answer the same reporter's next question without any
hesitation.
There you go:
He answers the reporter's first question promptly.
She asked a follow-up (which they chose not to include in their clip),
which her question finishes at 7:31 into the full video:
<https://youtu.be/jDaDo7KiVTo?si=-MaGbmGNG1c87bmz&t=451>
...and then he started his answer 3 seconds later:
<https://youtu.be/jDaDo7KiVTo?si=8KBiyLfFX-zALEH6&t=454>
The video clip you referenced deliberately cuts the audio for the final >> two seconds of the reporter's question, so they can make the hesitation >> seem longer.
LOL! At 7:56 he COMPLETELY LOSES his train of thought, COMPLETELY!Nope.
He just clearly thinks there's not much point in saying more about
McCarthy; that it wouldn't be productive.
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 8:32:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-10-05 20:26, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 10:11:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Nope.
On 2023-10-03 22:14, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/is-joe-biden-ok-concerning-video-goes-viral/ar-AA1hDWWl?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=0c8d2bc1a6c04a05b1f0ecf0de2cda87&ei=48
No... ...even your biased sourced doesn't claim that.
Someone took a 27 second clip out of an 8:27 statement followed by
questions, and at no time in that other 8 minutes did he show a single >>>> moment of "losing it".
He just took his time to answer this question:
"But are you worried that he [McCarthy] is going to be forced by fellow >>>> Republicans to back away from any deal he cuts with you?
And it's clear from context that he was just trying to choose his words >>>> wisely.
He ends with, "I'm not being facetious".
(Serious question for you, Sunshine: Do you really think Trump would
even know what that word meant?)
And then he clearly thinks that there's nothing more he needs to say on >>>> the subject of McCarthy.
He goes on to answer the same reporter's next question without any
hesitation.
There you go:
He answers the reporter's first question promptly.
She asked a follow-up (which they chose not to include in their clip), >>>> which her question finishes at 7:31 into the full video:
<https://youtu.be/jDaDo7KiVTo?si=-MaGbmGNG1c87bmz&t=451>
...and then he started his answer 3 seconds later:
<https://youtu.be/jDaDo7KiVTo?si=8KBiyLfFX-zALEH6&t=454>
The video clip you referenced deliberately cuts the audio for the final >>>> two seconds of the reporter's question, so they can make the hesitation >>>> seem longer.
LOL! At 7:56 he COMPLETELY LOSES his train of thought, COMPLETELY!
He just clearly thinks there's not much point in saying more about
McCarthy; that it wouldn't be productive.
No, sunshine, the senile pervert COMPLETELY LOSES IT, and it is ALL ON TAPE!!!! Of course, libtards like you are in TOTAL DENIAL!!!!!!!!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 60:04:17 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,243 |
| Messages: | 5,355,702 |