Yet another poll devasting to the senile pervert has just been released: https://www.axios.com/2023/09/18/voters-biden-trump-second-term-age
Only one-third think Lyin' Biden would complete a 2nd term; hell, I think the odds are that he won't finish the FIRST! Interestingly, the majority think that the Dims are EXTREME. The pervert's decline through the years is PALPABLE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc2i2ln6I1I
A fascinating part is how Lyin' Biden's strange behavior began after his first brain surgery.
And the WaPo is doing their hand-ringing over Lyin' Biden's age: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/09/18/biden-democrats-anxiety-age/
Finally, the ONE show that the senile pervert watches daily, Morning Joe, says that PRIVATELY every Dim he has talked to says that Lyin' Biden is TOO OLD!
https://nypost.com/2023/09/13/joe-scarborough-say-every-democrat-says-biden-is-too-old-to-run/
On 2023-09-20 15:07, Tommy wrote:
Yet another poll devasting to the senile pervert has just been released: https://www.axios.com/2023/09/18/voters-biden-trump-second-term-age
Only one-third think Lyin' Biden would complete a 2nd term; hell, I think the odds are that he won't finish the FIRST! Interestingly, the majority think that the Dims are EXTREME. The pervert's decline through the years is PALPABLE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc2i2ln6I1I
A fascinating part is how Lyin' Biden's strange behavior began after his first brain surgery.
And the WaPo is doing their hand-ringing over Lyin' Biden's age: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/09/18/biden-democrats-anxiety-age/
Finally, the ONE show that the senile pervert watches daily, Morning Joe, says that PRIVATELY every Dim he has talked to says that Lyin' Biden is TOO OLD!
https://nypost.com/2023/09/13/joe-scarborough-say-every-democrat-says-biden-is-too-old-to-run/
Hmmmmm...
The two most important polls were the two actual elections just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 3:37:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-20 15:07, Tommy wrote:
Yet another poll devasting to the senile pervert has just been released: >>> https://www.axios.com/2023/09/18/voters-biden-trump-second-term-ageHmmmmm...
Only one-third think Lyin' Biden would complete a 2nd term; hell, I think the odds are that he won't finish the FIRST! Interestingly, the majority think that the Dims are EXTREME. The pervert's decline through the years is PALPABLE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc2i2ln6I1I
A fascinating part is how Lyin' Biden's strange behavior began after his first brain surgery.
And the WaPo is doing their hand-ringing over Lyin' Biden's age:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/09/18/biden-democrats-anxiety-age/
Finally, the ONE show that the senile pervert watches daily, Morning Joe, says that PRIVATELY every Dim he has talked to says that Lyin' Biden is TOO OLD!
https://nypost.com/2023/09/13/joe-scarborough-say-every-democrat-says-biden-is-too-old-to-run/
The two most important polls were the two actual elections just decided,
weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the FUTURE, FOOL!
On 2023-09-28 08:11, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 3:37:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-20 15:07, Tommy wrote:
Yet another poll devasting to the senile pervert has just been released: >>> https://www.axios.com/2023/09/18/voters-biden-trump-second-term-ageHmmmmm...
Only one-third think Lyin' Biden would complete a 2nd term; hell, I think the odds are that he won't finish the FIRST! Interestingly, the majority think that the Dims are EXTREME. The pervert's decline through the years is PALPABLE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc2i2ln6I1I
A fascinating part is how Lyin' Biden's strange behavior began after his first brain surgery.
And the WaPo is doing their hand-ringing over Lyin' Biden's age:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/09/18/biden-democrats-anxiety-age/
Finally, the ONE show that the senile pervert watches daily, Morning Joe, says that PRIVATELY every Dim he has talked to says that Lyin' Biden is TOO OLD!
https://nypost.com/2023/09/13/joe-scarborough-say-every-democrat-says-biden-is-too-old-to-run/
The two most important polls were the two actual elections just decided, >> weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the FUTURE, FOOL!Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about theThe two most important polls were the two actual elections just
decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the FUTURE,
FOOL!
future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic Red
Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated for
criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been nice? OF
COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about theThe two most important polls were the two actual elections just
decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the FUTURE,
FOOL!
future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic Red
Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated forHow's that investigation going?
criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, AlanHow's that investigation going?
wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING aboutThe two most important polls were the two actual elections
just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic
Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated
for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, AlanHow's that investigation going?
wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING aboutThe two most important polls were the two actual elections
just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic
Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated
for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" IHandwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
Take your best shot.
:-)
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, AlanHow's that investigation going?
wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING aboutThe two most important polls were the two actual elections
just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic
Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated
for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, AlanHow's that investigation going?
wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING aboutThe two most important polls were the two actual elections
just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic
Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated
for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged.
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, AlanHow's that investigation going?
wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING aboutThe two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic
Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated
for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been >>>>>>> nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!
On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged.
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example. >>>>
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, AlanHow's that investigation going?
wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been >>>>>>> nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I >>>>> assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!No.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No.
On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged.
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example. >>>>>>
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>> wrote:How's that investigation going?
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been >>>>>>>>> nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I >>>>>>> assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation >>>>>>> records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No.
On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged. >>>>>
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:Take your best shot.
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:How's that investigation going?
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been >>>>>>>>>>> nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I >>>>>>>>> assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation >>>>>>>>> records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out? >>>>>>>> Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example. >>>>>>>>
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No.
On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged.
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:Take your best shot.
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>> wrote:How's that investigation going?
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been >>>>>>>>> nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I >>>>>>> assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation >>>>>>> records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out? >>>>>> Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example. >>>>>>
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:No.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged. >>>>>
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:Take your best shot.
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:How's that investigation going?
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been >>>>>>>>>>> nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I >>>>>>>>> assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation >>>>>>>>> records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out? >>>>>>>> Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example. >>>>>>>>
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a
single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who
won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden. >>>
On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:No.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged. >>>>>>>
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:Take your best shot.
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:How's that investigation going?
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>>>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been >>>>>>>>>>>>> nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I >>>>>>>>>>> assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation >>>>>>>>>>> records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out? >>>>>>>>>> Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example. >>>>>>>>>>
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a
single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who
won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden. >>>
On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:No.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged. >>>>>>>
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:Take your best shot.
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:How's that investigation going?
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>>>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been >>>>>>>>>>>>> nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I >>>>>>>>>>> assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation >>>>>>>>>>> records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out? >>>>>>>>>> Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example. >>>>>>>>>>
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a
single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who
won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!
On 2023-09-30 19:18, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:No.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged. >>>>>>>
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>>>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory. >>>>>>>>>>>> How's that investigation going?
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation >>>>>>>>>>> records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out? >>>>>>>>>> Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a
single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who
won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!No.
You absolutely did not, Sunshine.
I'm going to ask you a very simple question. Simple enough, I hope, even
for you. Answer yes or no.
Have personally seen a piece of evidence that you believe incriminates
Joe Biden?
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:38:16 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:18, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No.
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:No.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged. >>>>>>>>>
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How's that investigation going?
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation >>>>>>>>>>>>> records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out? >>>>>>>>>>>> Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a
single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who
won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!
You absolutely did not, Sunshine.
I'm going to ask you a very simple question. Simple enough, I hope, even
for you. Answer yes or no.
Have personally seen a piece of evidence that you believe incriminates
Joe Biden?
Do you agree that BooBoo failed to report millions of dollars of income?
On 2023-09-30 19:18, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:No.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged. >>>>>>>
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the future then.The two most important polls were the two actual elections >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated >>>>>>>>>>>>> for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory. >>>>>>>>>>>> How's that investigation going?
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation >>>>>>>>>>> records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out? >>>>>>>>>> Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a
single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who
won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!
No.
You absolutely did not, Sunshine.
I'm going to ask you a very simple question. Simple enough, I hope, even
for you. Answer yes or no.
Have personally seen a piece of evidence that you believe incriminates
Joe Biden?
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 3:26:42 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 11:21:46 AM UTC+9, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:18, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:No.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged.
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING aboutThe two most important polls were the two actual elections
just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic
Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated
for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory. >>>>>>>>>>>> How's that investigation going?
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a >> single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who >> won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!
No.
You absolutely did not, Sunshine.
I'm going to ask you a very simple question. Simple enough, I hope, even for you. Answer yes or no.
Have personally seen a piece of evidence that you believe incriminates Joe Biden?
In the meantime, Tommy himself invariably has SARs reports himself… …that is, if he really is as financially prosperous as he has claimed.
After all, a SAR gets filed for:
“… cash transactions exceeding $10,000 (daily aggregate amount)”
…which can be exceeded on a car purchase (or even just the down payment),
a large credit card transaction, etc…
As such, the evidence that we have seen that Biden is a crook is the same as
what we’ve seen that Tommy’s a crook too. And we all know the old saying:
“Every accusation is a confession”(!).
WOW! I didn't know that the Biden Crime Family bought ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-SIX cars!! They must have been starting a used car dealership!!!
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 11:21:46 AM UTC+9, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:18, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:No.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged.
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING aboutThe two most important polls were the two actual elections
just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FUTURE, FOOL!
the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic
Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated
for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory. >>>>>>>>>>>> How's that investigation going?
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out? >>>>>>>>>> Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!!
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a
single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who >> won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!
No.
You absolutely did not, Sunshine.
I'm going to ask you a very simple question. Simple enough, I hope, even for you. Answer yes or no.
Have personally seen a piece of evidence that you believe incriminatesIn the meantime, Tommy himself invariably has SARs reports himself… …that is, if he really is as financially prosperous as he has claimed.
Joe Biden?
After all, a SAR gets filed for:
“… cash transactions exceeding $10,000 (daily aggregate amount)”
…which can be exceeded on a car purchase (or even just the down payment), a large credit card transaction, etc…
As such, the evidence that we have seen that Biden is a crook is the same as what we’ve seen that Tommy’s a crook too. And we all know the old saying:
“Every accusation is a confession”(!).
-hh
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 9:31:53 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 3:26:42 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 11:21:46 AM UTC+9, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:18, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged.
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING aboutThe two most important polls were the two actual elections
just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic
Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated
for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory. >>>>>>>>>>>> How's that investigation going?
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!! >>>>>> No.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a >> single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who
won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!
No.
You absolutely did not, Sunshine.
I'm going to ask you a very simple question. Simple enough, I hope, even
for you. Answer yes or no.
(Still silence from Tommy)Have personally seen a piece of evidence that you believe incriminates Joe Biden?
In the meantime, Tommy himself invariably has SARs reports himself… …that is, if he really is as financially prosperous as he has claimed.
After all, a SAR gets filed for:
“… cash transactions exceeding $10,000 (daily aggregate amount)”
…which can be exceeded on a car purchase (or even just the down payment),
a large credit card transaction, etc…
As such, the evidence that we have seen that Biden is a crook is the same as
what we’ve seen that Tommy’s a crook too. And we all know the old saying:
“Every accusation is a confession”(!).
WOW! I didn't know that the Biden Crime Family bought ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-SIX cars!! They must have been starting a used car dealership!!!Over how many people & how many years? SAR has existed for just over 30 years,
so that’s an average of just 5.5/year…and if it’s probing multiple family members &
business associates, that’s easily a half dozen if not more, so <1/yr.
So how many $10+K transactions have you had this year yourself, “multi-millionaire”?
Zero, because you’re not actually a multi-millionaire? FYI, don’t forget that since there
is no penalty for over reporting., firms may conservatively apply the Regs by reporting
all transactions of $10K & up, so as to avoid the risk of an underreporting violation.
-hh
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 7:10:20 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 9:31:53 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 3:26:42 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 11:21:46 AM UTC+9, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:18, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I'm denying that they present actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you cannot produce a single actual example when challenged.
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Handwaving is insufficient, Sunshine. Give a single ACTUAL example.
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you said the EXACT SAME THING aboutThe two most important polls were the two actual elections
just decided, weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
the future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are swinging to the GOP and a historic
Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and WHO is being investigated
for criminal conduct? Would have a larger margin of victory been
nice? OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a victory. >>>>>>>>>>>> How's that investigation going?
Got a single piece of real evidence yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are uncovering more. By "real" I
assume you mean bank records, emails, travel records, visitation
records, and eye witness testimony - did I leave anything out?
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens by various banks, Fool.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX examples, Fool!! >>>>>> No.
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the contents of a
single one and you're just accepting the word of the Rethuglicans who
won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!
No.
You absolutely did not, Sunshine.
I'm going to ask you a very simple question. Simple enough, I hope, even
for you. Answer yes or no.
(Still silence from Tommy)Have personally seen a piece of evidence that you believe incriminates
Joe Biden?
In the meantime, Tommy himself invariably has SARs reports himself… …that is, if he really is as financially prosperous as he has claimed.
After all, a SAR gets filed for:
“… cash transactions exceeding $10,000 (daily aggregate amount)”
…which can be exceeded on a car purchase (or even just the down payment),
a large credit card transaction, etc…
As such, the evidence that we have seen that Biden is a crook is the same as
what we’ve seen that Tommy’s a crook too. And we all know the old saying:
“Every accusation is a confession”(!).
WOW! I didn't know that the Biden Crime Family bought ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-SIX cars!! They must have been starting a used car dealership!!!
Over how many people & how many years? SAR has existed for just over 30 years,
so that’s an average of just 5.5/year…and if it’s probing multiple family members &
business associates, that’s easily a half dozen if not more, so <1/yr.
So how many $10+K transactions have you had this year yourself, “multi-millionaire”?
Zero, because you’re not actually a multi-millionaire? FYI, don’t forget that since there
is no penalty for over reporting., firms may conservatively apply the Regs by reporting
all transactions of $10K & up, so as to avoid the risk of an underreporting violation.
LOL! I have had PLENTY of such transactions, you IDIOT! I had multiple such transactions
when I bought my new motorglider, the largest one I had to provide an invoice from the
manufacturer to prove that this was a legitimate transaction. We routinely transfer large
amounts in and out of Fidelity. This is NORMAL for a multi-millionaire such as myself.
BooBoo's problems come from transferring LARGE amounts from foreign companies
with NO supporting documentation.
After all, WHAT did he do to earn MILLIONS?
LOL! I have had PLENTY of such transactions, you IDIOT! I had multiple
such transactions when I bought my new motorglider, the largest one I
had to provide an invoice from the manufacturer to prove that this was a legitimate transaction. We routinely transfer large amounts in and out
of Fidelity. This is NORMAL for a multi-millionaire such as myself.
BooBoo's problems come from transferring LARGE amounts from foreign
companies with NO supporting documentation. After all, WHAT did he do to
earn MILLIONS?
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 7:10:20 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 9:31:53 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 3:26:42 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:(Still silence from Tommy)
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 11:21:46 AM UTC+9, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:18, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:08:33 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-30 19:05, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-7,Why are you not showing one, Sunshine?
Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-30 16:48, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:11:07 PM UTC-7,I'm denying that they present actual evidence of
Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-29 21:04, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 7:37:23 PMNo.
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-29 19:36, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, September 29, 2023 atAnd yet you cannot produce a single actual
10:10:40 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 20:58, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 atHandwaving is insufficient, Sunshine.
7:25:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-28 19:03, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 atHow's that investigation going?
12:14:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
Indeed, and in the past, you saidThe two most important polls
were the two actual
elections just decided,
weren't they?
How did those go?
:-)
LOL! The question isn't about
the PAST, it is about the
FUTURE, FOOL!
the EXACT SAME THING about the
future then.
How did that go for you?
Remember the "red wave"? No?
Let me refresh your memory:
"And all of the polls are
swinging to the GOP and a
historic Red Wave:"
Do you recall who wrote that,
Sunshine?
:-)
And WHO is control of the House and
WHO is being investigated for
criminal conduct? Would have a
larger margin of victory been nice?
OF COURSE, Fool. But a victory IS a
victory.
Got a single piece of real evidence
yet?
:-)
God, there is TONS of it and they are
uncovering more. By "real" I assume you
mean bank records, emails, travel
records, visitation records, and eye
witness testimony - did I leave
anything out?
Give a single ACTUAL example.
Take your best shot.
:-)
There are ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX
Suspicious Activity Reports on the Bidens
by various banks, Fool.
example when challenged.
LOL! That is ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX
examples, Fool!!
I'm asking YOU to produce one single ACTUAL
example.
Quote it HERE.
Or admit you've got nothing.
:-)
Are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
Again, are you saying these SARs DON'T EXIST?
Could it be because you can't even show a link to the
contents of a single one and you're just accepting the
word of the Rethuglicans who won't show them?
Or could it be that SARs don't actually prove
wrongdoing?
:-)
You claim there is lots of evidence.
So show SOMETHING.
I DID!
No.
You absolutely did not, Sunshine.
I'm going to ask you a very simple question. Simple enough, I
hope, even for you. Answer yes or no.
Have personally seen a piece of evidence that you believe
incriminates Joe Biden?
Over how many people & how many years? SAR has existed for justIn the meantime, Tommy himself invariably has SARs reports
himself… …that is, if he really is as financially prosperous as
he has claimed.
After all, a SAR gets filed for: “… cash transactions exceeding
$10,000 (daily aggregate amount)”
…which can be exceeded on a car purchase (or even just the down
payment), a large credit card transaction, etc…
As such, the evidence that we have seen that Biden is a crook
is the same as what we’ve seen that Tommy’s a crook too. And we
all know the old saying: “Every accusation is a
confession”(!).
WOW! I didn't know that the Biden Crime Family bought ONE HUNDRED
AND SEVENTY-SIX cars!! They must have been starting a used car
dealership!!!
over 30 years, so that’s an average of just 5.5/year…and if it’s
probing multiple family members & business associates, that’s
easily a half dozen if not more, so <1/yr.
So how many $10+K transactions have you had this year yourself,
“multi-millionaire”?
Zero, because you’re not actually a multi-millionaire? FYI, don’t
forget that since there is no penalty for over reporting., firms
may conservatively apply the Regs by reporting all transactions of
$10K & up, so as to avoid the risk of an underreporting violation.
-hh
LOL! I have had PLENTY of such transactions, you IDIOT! I had
multiple such transactions when I bought my new motorglider, the
largest one I had to provide an invoice from the manufacturer to
prove that this was a legitimate transaction. We routinely transfer
large amounts in and out of Fidelity. This is NORMAL for a
multi-millionaire such as myself. BooBoo's problems come from
transferring LARGE amounts from foreign companies with NO supporting documentation. After all, WHAT did he do to earn MILLIONS?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 68:10:37 |
| Calls: | 6,712 |
| Files: | 12,244 |
| Messages: | 5,356,545 |