Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial? https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/29/democrats-arent-interfering-in-2024-election-with-trump-trial-theyre-blatantly-rigging-it/
On 2023-08-29 15:16, Tommy wrote:
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial? https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/29/democrats-arent-interfering-in-2024-election-with-trump-trial-theyre-blatantly-rigging-it/What part of it is election rigging?
Do you think that if you commit crimes you should be able to declare
you're running for office and not face justice until the election is over?
From your own source, Sunshine:
"he will almost certainly be convicted over the summer. "
And that's what you're wacky source thinks.
If there is evidence of crimes (there is; in spades)...
...then it should be approached as it is with any other defendant.
As Chutkan put it:
"I want to note here that setting a trial date does not depend and
should not depend on the defendant's personal or professional obligations,
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 3:33:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-29 15:16, Tommy wrote:
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial?What part of it is election rigging?
https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/29/democrats-arent-interfering-in-2024-election-with-trump-trial-theyre-blatantly-rigging-it/
Do you think that if you commit crimes you should be able to declare
you're running for office and not face justice until the election is over? >>
From your own source, Sunshine:
"he will almost certainly be convicted over the summer. "
And that's what you're wacky source thinks.
If there is evidence of crimes (there is; in spades)...
...then it should be approached as it is with any other defendant.
As Chutkan put it:
"I want to note here that setting a trial date does not depend and
should not depend on the defendant's personal or professional obligations,
Hey Fool, you obviously didn't read the article; do it BEFORE you comment.
On 2023-08-29 19:39, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 3:33:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-29 15:16, Tommy wrote:
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial?What part of it is election rigging?
https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/29/democrats-arent-interfering-in-2024-election-with-trump-trial-theyre-blatantly-rigging-it/
Do you think that if you commit crimes you should be able to declare
you're running for office and not face justice until the election is over?
From your own source, Sunshine:
"he will almost certainly be convicted over the summer. "
And that's what you're wacky source thinks.
If there is evidence of crimes (there is; in spades)...
...then it should be approached as it is with any other defendant.
As Chutkan put it:
"I want to note here that setting a trial date does not depend and
should not depend on the defendant's personal or professional obligations,
Hey Fool, you obviously didn't read the article; do it BEFORE you comment.I asked you a specific question and you can't answer.
There is extensive evidence...
...provided by Republican witnesses...
...and heard by grand juries of ordinary citizens...
...that Trump committed numerous felonies.
Why shouldn't those play out like for any other person alleged to have committed crimes?
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 7:55:40 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-29 19:39, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 3:33:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-29 15:16, Tommy wrote:Hey Fool, you obviously didn't read the article; do it BEFORE you comment. >> I asked you a specific question and you can't answer.
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial?What part of it is election rigging?
https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/29/democrats-arent-interfering-in-2024-election-with-trump-trial-theyre-blatantly-rigging-it/
Do you think that if you commit crimes you should be able to declare
you're running for office and not face justice until the election is over? >>>>
From your own source, Sunshine:
"he will almost certainly be convicted over the summer. "
And that's what you're wacky source thinks.
If there is evidence of crimes (there is; in spades)...
...then it should be approached as it is with any other defendant.
As Chutkan put it:
"I want to note here that setting a trial date does not depend and
should not depend on the defendant's personal or professional obligations, >>>
There is extensive evidence...
...provided by Republican witnesses...
...and heard by grand juries of ordinary citizens...
...that Trump committed numerous felonies.
Why shouldn't those play out like for any other person alleged to have
committed crimes?
The article answered ALL of your questions.
On 2023-08-29 20:44, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 7:55:40 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-29 19:39, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 3:33:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I asked you a specific question and you can't answer.
On 2023-08-29 15:16, Tommy wrote:
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial?What part of it is election rigging?
https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/29/democrats-arent-interfering-in-2024-election-with-trump-trial-theyre-blatantly-rigging-it/
Do you think that if you commit crimes you should be able to declare >>>> you're running for office and not face justice until the election is over?
From your own source, Sunshine:
"he will almost certainly be convicted over the summer. "
And that's what you're wacky source thinks.
If there is evidence of crimes (there is; in spades)...
...then it should be approached as it is with any other defendant.
As Chutkan put it:
"I want to note here that setting a trial date does not depend and
should not depend on the defendant's personal or professional obligations,
Hey Fool, you obviously didn't read the article; do it BEFORE you comment.
There is extensive evidence...
...provided by Republican witnesses...
...and heard by grand juries of ordinary citizens...
...that Trump committed numerous felonies.
Why shouldn't those play out like for any other person alleged to have
committed crimes?
The article answered ALL of your questions.So then it should be easy for you to provide the answers...
...but you don't.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 9:36:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-29 20:44, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 7:55:40 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So then it should be easy for you to provide the answers...
On 2023-08-29 19:39, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 3:33:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I asked you a specific question and you can't answer.
On 2023-08-29 15:16, Tommy wrote:
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial?What part of it is election rigging?
https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/29/democrats-arent-interfering-in-2024-election-with-trump-trial-theyre-blatantly-rigging-it/
Do you think that if you commit crimes you should be able to declare >>>>>> you're running for office and not face justice until the election is over?
From your own source, Sunshine:
"he will almost certainly be convicted over the summer. "
And that's what you're wacky source thinks.
If there is evidence of crimes (there is; in spades)...
...then it should be approached as it is with any other defendant. >>>>>>
As Chutkan put it:
"I want to note here that setting a trial date does not depend and >>>>>> should not depend on the defendant's personal or professional obligations,
Hey Fool, you obviously didn't read the article; do it BEFORE you comment.
There is extensive evidence...
...provided by Republican witnesses...
...and heard by grand juries of ordinary citizens...
...that Trump committed numerous felonies.
Why shouldn't those play out like for any other person alleged to have >>>> committed crimes?
The article answered ALL of your questions.
...but you don't.
Hey Fool, I have asked you THREE TIMES to answer a question, so, NO, I won't answer ANY questions until YOU DO.
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial?
Tommy wrote:
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial?Of course; he's guilty as hell and should hang. Seems fair.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 8:19:23 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial?Of course; he's guilty as hell and should hang. Seems fair.
That statement should be included in an appeal to throw the entire case out of court, FOREVER!
On 2023-09-05 23:25, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 8:19:23 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fair trial?Of course; he's guilty as hell and should hang. Seems fair.
That statement should be included in an appeal to throw the entire case out of court, FOREVER!Why? Is Bigbird a judge on this case, Sunshine?
Please explain for some more amusement for the rest of us.
;-)
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 10:55:06 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-05 23:25, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 8:19:23 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:Why? Is Bigbird a judge on this case, Sunshine?
Tommy wrote:
Do ANY of you libtards think that Trump can get a fairOf course; he's guilty as hell and should hang. Seems fair.
trial?
That statement should be included in an appeal to throw the
entire case out of court, FOREVER!
Please explain for some more amusement for the rest of us.
;-)
Obviously, you libtards are VERY AMUSED by all of the kangaroo court
trials of Trump, even GIDDY with excitement! Such is your blind
commitment to the libtard movement. What I will remind you of is this
is a double-edged sword that can bite you in the ass at some point in
the future. Trump is obviously being politically prosecuted to
prevent him from running for office. The danger for you libtards is
that the rest of the electorate recognizes it for what it is and says
ENOUGH, ALREADY, voting the likes of the senile pervert, Lyin' Biden
out of office.
Worse, Lyin' Biden is EXTREMELY vulnerable to being criminally
prosecuted for all of his illegal activities, and the inclination of
the public to say "Oh well, he is out of office, let's just ignore it
for the sake of bipartisanship" is OFF THE TABLE. Right now there is something on the order of ELEVEN Lyin' Biden family members who have
received illegal payments from their criminal activities, a number
that is UNPRECEDENTED in American politics. The damage this can do to
the Dims has no parallel in our history.
... What I will remind you of is this is a double-edged sword that can bite you in the ass at some point in the future.
Trump is obviously being politically prosecuted to prevent him from running for office.
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:08:08 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
... What I will remind you of is this is a double-edged sword that can bite you in the ass at some point in the future.
Gosh, that sounds like a threat of deliberate illegal activity.
Trump is obviously being politically prosecuted to prevent him from running for office.Nope. These investigations started long before he announced any candidacy.
FYI, you should realize that this sort of thing has happened before, and there have been people
with respect for Rule of Law even when the political calculus goes elsewhere. For example,
Jerry Ford's press secretary Jerald terHorst promptly resigned when he learned that Ford was
going to pardon Nixon:
"It was simply after a great deal of soul-searching that I decided I couldn't in good conscience
support the President's decision on former President Nixon, even though I knew he took that
action in good conscience."
-hh
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 12:12:14 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:08:08 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
... What I will remind you of is this is a double-edged sword
that can bite you in the ass at some point in the future.
Gosh, that sounds like a threat of deliberate illegal activity.
Trump is obviously being politically prosecuted to prevent himNope. These investigations started long before he announced any
from running for office.
candidacy.
FYI, you should realize that this sort of thing has happened
before, and there have been people with respect for Rule of Law
even when the political calculus goes elsewhere. For example, Jerry
Ford's press secretary Jerald terHorst promptly resigned when he
learned that Ford was going to pardon Nixon:
"It was simply after a great deal of soul-searching that I decided
I couldn't in good conscience support the President's decision on
former President Nixon, even though I knew he took that action in
good conscience."
-hh
When the investigations were started has NOTHING to do with
prosecutorial misconduct. These charges were filed with the SOLE
PURPOSE of interfering with Trump's political campaign. Lyin' Biden
STOLE classified documents and is NOT FACING any legal action
whatsoever. Shrillary had classified documents on an ILLEGAL PRIVATE
SERVER that was hacked by foreign nations and IS NOT facing any legal
action.
On 2023-09-07 18:53, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 12:12:14 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:08:08 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
... What I will remind you of is this is a double-edged sword
that can bite you in the ass at some point in the future.
Gosh, that sounds like a threat of deliberate illegal activity.
Trump is obviously being politically prosecuted to prevent him
from running for office.
Nope. These investigations started long before he announced any
candidacy.
FYI, you should realize that this sort of thing has happened
before, and there have been people with respect for Rule of Law
even when the political calculus goes elsewhere. For example, Jerry
Ford's press secretary Jerald terHorst promptly resigned when he
learned that Ford was going to pardon Nixon:
"It was simply after a great deal of soul-searching that I decided
I couldn't in good conscience support the President's decision on
former President Nixon, even though I knew he took that action in
good conscience."
When the investigations were started has NOTHING to do with
prosecutorial misconduct. These charges were filed with the SOLE
PURPOSE of interfering with Trump's political campaign. Lyin' Biden
STOLE classified documents and is NOT FACING any legal action
whatsoever. Shrillary had classified documents on an ILLEGAL PRIVATE SERVER that was hacked by foreign nations and IS NOT facing any legal action.
Trump hadn't even said he was going to run when the investigations were started, Sunshine. That's just a fact.
Biden didn't "steal" anything. "Stealing" requires a guilty mind. Biden
had some classified documents that he didn't know he had.
Trump deliberately TOOK classified documents. KNOWINGLY.
Clinton had a few emails that contained SOME classified information;
much of it sent to her rather than put there by her.
Try to keep up, Sunshine.
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 1:46:45 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-07 18:53, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 12:12:14 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 8:08:08 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
... What I will remind you of is this is a double-edged sword
that can bite you in the ass at some point in the future.
Gosh, that sounds like a threat of deliberate illegal activity.
Trump is obviously being politically prosecuted to prevent him
from running for office.
Nope. These investigations started long before he announced any
candidacy.
FYI, you should realize that this sort of thing has happened
before, and there have been people with respect for Rule of Law
even when the political calculus goes elsewhere. For example, Jerry
Ford's press secretary Jerald terHorst promptly resigned when he
learned that Ford was going to pardon Nixon:
"It was simply after a great deal of soul-searching that I decided
I couldn't in good conscience support the President's decision on
former President Nixon, even though I knew he took that action in
good conscience."
When the investigations were started has NOTHING to do with prosecutorial misconduct. These charges were filed with the SOLE
PURPOSE of interfering with Trump's political campaign. Lyin' Biden STOLE classified documents and is NOT FACING any legal action whatsoever. Shrillary had classified documents on an ILLEGAL PRIVATE SERVER that was hacked by foreign nations and IS NOT facing any legal action.
Trump hadn't even said he was going to run when the investigations were started, Sunshine. That's just a fact.
Indeed. Some of Trump’s investigations predate him even announcing his Candidacy back in 2015. Plus Tommy’s assuming that such ”Illuminati” stuff must be all-powerful, but if that was true, then Trump would have never been elected in 2016…or received the GOP nomination.
Biden didn't "steal" anything. "Stealing" requires a guilty mind. Biden had some classified documents that he didn't know he had.
Tommy’s just illustrating that even if he really did have a clearance,
he never applied it.
Trump deliberately TOOK classified documents. KNOWINGLY.
Including as he was heading out the door, where he knew that he didn’t have a Need to Know, let alone a still-active clearance.
Clinton had a few emails that contained SOME classified information;
much of it sent to her rather than put there by her.
Classical ‘spillage’ which a decade ago was rife with IT challenges
due to the rate of technological change. I recently found (and tossed)
a now-ancient RIM secure encryption accessory that I had for one of
my Blackberries from that era…a huge issue was that Govt IT was having problems keeping up with the rate of tech changes in smartphone support, which gave rise to stand-alone systems, etc. It all became vastly improved circa 2012? when Feds shut down using RIM and went to iOS/Android.
Try to keep up, Sunshine.
Tommy simply doesn’t want to leave his echo chamber.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 71:44:23 |
| Calls: | 6,713 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,246 |
| Messages: | 5,356,979 |