• World was MUCH warmer 416,000 years ago than today

    From Tommy@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 23 20:46:00 2023
    ...but scientists DON'T get the message! https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113113.htm

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Jul 24 04:48:58 2023
    On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:46:02 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    ...but scientists DON'T get the message! https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113113.htm

    Looks like an old “engineer” has forgotten about the physics of Inertia.

    How much would Florida’s economy be impacted by +23ft of sea level rise? Would your son’s house be underwater?

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Jul 24 15:12:14 2023
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:21:26 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 4:49:00 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:46:02 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    ...but scientists DON'T get the message! https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113113.htm
    Looks like an old “engineer” has forgotten about the physics of Inertia.

    How much would Florida’s economy be impacted by +23ft of sea level rise? Would your son’s house be underwater?


    The Lyin' Asshole apparently didn't read the article (SURPRISE!).

    No, Tommy certainly didn’t, for else he would have recognized that when I mentioned
    23 feet, it was from the article:

    “Since about twenty-three feet of sea-level rise is tied up in Greenland's ice, every
    coastal region in the world is at risk.”

    Likewise, the average elevation of FL is less than 60ft. Maps vary but the simple
    high level summary is that ~90% of FL south of Lake Okeechobee go underwater, as well as most coastal towns on both coasts; see:

    https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/topics/sea-level-rise>

    TL;DR: figure about a third of its landmass, and half of its total economy (primary saving grace being Disney is on higher ground).

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to -hh on Mon Jul 24 14:21:24 2023
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 4:49:00 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:46:02 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    ...but scientists DON'T get the message! https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113113.htm
    Looks like an old “engineer” has forgotten about the physics of Inertia.

    How much would Florida’s economy be impacted by +23ft of sea level rise? Would your son’s house be underwater?

    -hh

    The Lyin' Asshole apparently didn't read the article (SURPRISE!).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to -hh on Mon Jul 24 17:38:29 2023
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:12:16 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:21:26 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 4:49:00 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:46:02 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    ...but scientists DON'T get the message! https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113113.htm
    Looks like an old “engineer” has forgotten about the physics of Inertia.

    How much would Florida’s economy be impacted by +23ft of sea level rise?
    Would your son’s house be underwater?


    The Lyin' Asshole apparently didn't read the article (SURPRISE!).
    No, Tommy certainly didn’t, for else he would have recognized that when I mentioned
    23 feet, it was from the article:

    “Since about twenty-three feet of sea-level rise is tied up in Greenland's ice, every
    coastal region in the world is at risk.”

    Likewise, the average elevation of FL is less than 60ft. Maps vary but the simple
    high level summary is that ~90% of FL south of Lake Okeechobee go underwater,
    as well as most coastal towns on both coasts; see:

    https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/topics/sea-level-rise>

    TL;DR: figure about a third of its landmass, and half of its total economy (primary saving grace being Disney is on higher ground).

    -hh

    LOL! I don't think that Disney would have built in Florida 416,000 years ago because it would have been UNDER WATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Jul 24 17:45:17 2023
    On 2023-07-24 17:38, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:12:16 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:21:26 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 4:49:00 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:46:02 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    ...but scientists DON'T get the message!
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113113.htm
    Looks like an old “engineer” has forgotten about the physics of Inertia.

    How much would Florida’s economy be impacted by +23ft of sea level rise? >>>> Would your son’s house be underwater?


    The Lyin' Asshole apparently didn't read the article (SURPRISE!).
    No, Tommy certainly didn’t, for else he would have recognized that when I mentioned
    23 feet, it was from the article:

    “Since about twenty-three feet of sea-level rise is tied up in Greenland's ice, every
    coastal region in the world is at risk.”

    Likewise, the average elevation of FL is less than 60ft. Maps vary but the simple
    high level summary is that ~90% of FL south of Lake Okeechobee go underwater,
    as well as most coastal towns on both coasts; see:

    https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/topics/sea-level-rise>

    TL;DR: figure about a third of its landmass, and half of its total economy >> (primary saving grace being Disney is on higher ground).

    -hh

    LOL! I don't think that Disney would have built in Florida 416,000 years ago because it would have been UNDER WATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    What about what you just wrote is relevant, Sunshine?

    The point is that YOUR article points out that those temperatures would
    result in sea levels that would drown large parts of Florida.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jul 27 18:11:39 2023
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:45:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-24 17:38, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:12:16 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:21:26 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 4:49:00 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:46:02 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    ...but scientists DON'T get the message!
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113113.htm
    Looks like an old “engineer” has forgotten about the physics of Inertia.

    How much would Florida’s economy be impacted by +23ft of sea level rise?
    Would your son’s house be underwater?


    The Lyin' Asshole apparently didn't read the article (SURPRISE!).
    No, Tommy certainly didn’t, for else he would have recognized that when I mentioned
    23 feet, it was from the article:

    “Since about twenty-three feet of sea-level rise is tied up in Greenland's ice, every
    coastal region in the world is at risk.”

    Likewise, the average elevation of FL is less than 60ft. Maps vary but the simple
    high level summary is that ~90% of FL south of Lake Okeechobee go underwater,
    as well as most coastal towns on both coasts; see:

    https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/topics/sea-level-rise>

    TL;DR: figure about a third of its landmass, and half of its total economy
    (primary saving grace being Disney is on higher ground).

    -hh

    LOL! I don't think that Disney would have built in Florida 416,000 years ago because it would have been UNDER WATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What about what you just wrote is relevant, Sunshine?

    The point is that YOUR article points out that those temperatures would result in sea levels that would drown large parts of Florida.

    The PAPER does NOT even mention Florida, Fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Thu Jul 27 18:44:08 2023
    On 2023-07-27 18:11, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:45:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-24 17:38, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:12:16 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:21:26 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 4:49:00 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:46:02 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    ...but scientists DON'T get the message!
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113113.htm
    Looks like an old “engineer” has forgotten about the physics of Inertia.

    How much would Florida’s economy be impacted by +23ft of sea level rise?
    Would your son’s house be underwater?


    The Lyin' Asshole apparently didn't read the article (SURPRISE!).
    No, Tommy certainly didn’t, for else he would have recognized that when I mentioned
    23 feet, it was from the article:

    “Since about twenty-three feet of sea-level rise is tied up in Greenland's ice, every
    coastal region in the world is at risk.”

    Likewise, the average elevation of FL is less than 60ft. Maps vary but the simple
    high level summary is that ~90% of FL south of Lake Okeechobee go underwater,
    as well as most coastal towns on both coasts; see:

    https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/topics/sea-level-rise>

    TL;DR: figure about a third of its landmass, and half of its total economy >>>> (primary saving grace being Disney is on higher ground).

    -hh

    LOL! I don't think that Disney would have built in Florida 416,000 years ago because it would have been UNDER WATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What about what you just wrote is relevant, Sunshine?

    The point is that YOUR article points out that those temperatures would
    result in sea levels that would drown large parts of Florida.

    The PAPER does NOT even mention Florida, Fool.

    It mentions sea level, Sunshine.

    Can you not figure out that a sea level rise of "twenty-three feet"
    would be devastating for Florida?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jul 27 18:47:31 2023
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:44:11 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-27 18:11, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:45:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-24 17:38, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:12:16 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:21:26 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 4:49:00 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:46:02 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    ...but scientists DON'T get the message!
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230721113113.htm >>>>>> Looks like an old “engineer” has forgotten about the physics of Inertia.

    How much would Florida’s economy be impacted by +23ft of sea level rise?
    Would your son’s house be underwater?


    The Lyin' Asshole apparently didn't read the article (SURPRISE!).
    No, Tommy certainly didn’t, for else he would have recognized that when I mentioned
    23 feet, it was from the article:

    “Since about twenty-three feet of sea-level rise is tied up in Greenland's ice, every
    coastal region in the world is at risk.”

    Likewise, the average elevation of FL is less than 60ft. Maps vary but the simple
    high level summary is that ~90% of FL south of Lake Okeechobee go underwater,
    as well as most coastal towns on both coasts; see:

    https://climatecenter.fsu.edu/topics/sea-level-rise>

    TL;DR: figure about a third of its landmass, and half of its total economy
    (primary saving grace being Disney is on higher ground).

    -hh

    LOL! I don't think that Disney would have built in Florida 416,000 years ago because it would have been UNDER WATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What about what you just wrote is relevant, Sunshine?

    The point is that YOUR article points out that those temperatures would >> result in sea levels that would drown large parts of Florida.

    The PAPER does NOT even mention Florida, Fool.

    It mentions sea level, Sunshine.

    Can you not figure out that a sea level rise of "twenty-three feet"
    would be devastating for Florida?
    :-)

    And Tommy has already dodged the question of what elevation his son’s FL home is at.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Jul 27 19:04:52 2023
    On 2023-07-27 18:47, -hh wrote:
    LOL! I don't think that Disney would have built in Florida 416,000 years ago because it would have been UNDER WATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What about what you just wrote is relevant, Sunshine?

    The point is that YOUR article points out that those temperatures would >>>> result in sea levels that would drown large parts of Florida.
    The PAPER does NOT even mention Florida, Fool.
    It mentions sea level, Sunshine.

    Can you not figure out that a sea level rise of "twenty-three feet"
    would be devastating for Florida?
    😄
    And Tommy has already dodged the question of what elevation his son’s FL home is at.

    Shocked, I am!

    Shocked, I tell you!

    ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Jul 30 17:45:29 2023
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:04:56 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-27 18:47, -hh wrote:
    LOL! I don't think that Disney would have built in Florida 416,000 years ago because it would have been UNDER WATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What about what you just wrote is relevant, Sunshine?

    The point is that YOUR article points out that those temperatures would >>>> result in sea levels that would drown large parts of Florida.
    The PAPER does NOT even mention Florida, Fool.
    It mentions sea level, Sunshine.

    Can you not figure out that a sea level rise of "twenty-three feet"
    would be devastating for Florida?
    😄
    And Tommy has already dodged the question of what elevation his son’s FL home is at.

    Shocked, I am!
    Shocked, I tell you!
    ;-)

    In the meantime, FL P&C insurance is the highest in the nation…

    < https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2023/07/30/just-what-does-home-insurance-cost-in-florida-estimates-vary-widely-and-new-state-data-might-surprise-you/>

    ..wonder if the TCO in FL is thus also at a CONUS national high?

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun Jul 30 21:21:07 2023
    On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 5:45:31 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:04:56 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-27 18:47, -hh wrote:
    LOL! I don't think that Disney would have built in Florida 416,000 years ago because it would have been UNDER WATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What about what you just wrote is relevant, Sunshine?

    The point is that YOUR article points out that those temperatures would
    result in sea levels that would drown large parts of Florida.
    The PAPER does NOT even mention Florida, Fool.
    It mentions sea level, Sunshine.

    Can you not figure out that a sea level rise of "twenty-three feet"
    would be devastating for Florida?
    😄
    And Tommy has already dodged the question of what elevation his son’s FL home is at.

    Shocked, I am!
    Shocked, I tell you!
    ;-)
    In the meantime, FL P&C insurance is the highest in the nation…

    < https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2023/07/30/just-what-does-home-insurance-cost-in-florida-estimates-vary-widely-and-new-state-data-might-surprise-you/>

    ..wonder if the TCO in FL is thus also at a CONUS national high?

    -hh

    Tell me, Lyin' Asshole, WTF does that have to do with my original post????

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Jul 31 03:11:07 2023
    On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 12:21:09 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 5:45:31 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:04:56 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-27 18:47, -hh wrote:
    LOL! I don't think that Disney would have built in Florida 416,000 years ago because it would have been UNDER WATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What about what you just wrote is relevant, Sunshine?

    The point is that YOUR article points out that those temperatures would
    result in sea levels that would drown large parts of Florida.
    The PAPER does NOT even mention Florida, Fool.
    It mentions sea level, Sunshine.

    Can you not figure out that a sea level rise of "twenty-three feet" >> would be devastating for Florida?
    😄
    And Tommy has already dodged the question of what elevation his son’s FL home is at.

    Shocked, I am!
    Shocked, I tell you!
    ;-)

    In the meantime, FL P&C insurance is the highest in the nation…

    < https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2023/07/30/just-what-does-home-insurance-cost-in-florida-estimates-vary-widely-and-new-state-data-might-surprise-you/>

    ..wonder if the TCO in FL is thus also at a CONUS national high?

    Tell me, Lyin' Asshole, WTF does that have to do with my original post????

    You can't figure it out, cupcake? Maybe you should go recall the times that you
    bitched about how too expensive NJ is for you, and that Florida (where your son
    moved to get away from you) is better only because its cheaper.

    Well, not only is it no longer cheaper, plus per your OP Greenland melting is invariably going to put a third of it underwater which will adversely affect its
    economy and real estate values.

    FYI, there's also how FL has had their sea temperature in Manatee Bay hit 100F this
    month, which has already called a massive coral bleaching die-off too. That also
    negatively FL values as well as increase risks of accelerated shore coastal erosion.
    Merely YA reason why FL sucks that you ignored in your ignorant "move there!" shouts.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)