A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national security
"professionals" declaring that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE and they KNEW it was
false. Here is a smoking-gun email showing that they were doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election: https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national security "professionals" declaring that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE and they KNEW it wasWe don't know it's false.
false. Here is a smoking-gun email showing that they were doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election: https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national securityWe don't know it's false.
"professionals" declaring that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian
disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE and they KNEW it was
false. Here is a smoking-gun email showing that they were doing it to
illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
Of course we do - you are one of very few libtards that think otherwise. And I don't think you believe that.
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:Of course we do - you are one of very few libtards that think otherwise. And I don't think you believe that.
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national security "professionals" declaring that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE and they KNEW it wasWe don't know it's false.
false. Here is a smoking-gun email showing that they were doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election: https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:We don't know it's false.
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national security
"professionals" declaring that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was
Russian disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE and they
KNEW it was false. Here is a smoking-gun email showing that
they were doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
Of course we do - you are one of very few libtards that think
otherwise. And I don't think you believe that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose of
influencing (also called manipulating) the election. This, BY ITSELF,
is ILLEGAL.
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:We don't know it's false.
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national security
"professionals" declaring that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was
Russian disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE and they
KNEW it was false. Here is a smoking-gun email showing that
they were doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
Of course we do - you are one of very few libtards that think
otherwise. And I don't think you believe that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose ofCite for that law that would make it illegal to sign a letter expressing your honest beliefs, please!
influencing (also called manipulating) the election. This, BY ITSELF,
is ILLEGAL.
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy wrote:Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign a letter
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:Of course we do - you are one of very few libtards that think
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national
security "professionals" declaring that Hunter BooBoo's
laptop was Russian disinformation. This, of course, was
FALSE and they KNEW it was false. Here is a smoking-gun
email showing that they were doing it to illegally
influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
We don't know it's false.
otherwise. And I don't think you believe that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose of
influencing (also called manipulating) the election. This, BY
ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.
expressing your honest beliefs, please!
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off, I know
because of my past employment at PNNL, a federal facility where we
had mandatory training on the subject. Second, you can look it up, it
is called the Hatch Act.
On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy wrote:Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign a letter
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:Of course we do - you are one of very few libtards that think
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national
security "professionals" declaring that Hunter BooBoo's
laptop was Russian disinformation. This, of course, was
FALSE and they KNEW it was false. Here is a smoking-gun
email showing that they were doing it to illegally
influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
We don't know it's false.
otherwise. And I don't think you believe that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose of
influencing (also called manipulating) the election. This, BY
ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.
expressing your honest beliefs, please!
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off, I knowI'll look it up...
because of my past employment at PNNL, a federal facility where we
had mandatory training on the subject. Second, you can look it up, it
is called the Hatch Act.
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the Hatch Act they violated.
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I'll look it up...
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy wrote:Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign a letter
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:Of course we do - you are one of very few libtards that
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national
security "professionals" declaring that Hunter
BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This, of
course, was FALSE and they KNEW it was false. Here is a
smoking-gun email showing that they were doing it to
illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
We don't know it's false.
think otherwise. And I don't think you believe that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose of
influencing (also called manipulating) the election. This,
BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.
expressing your honest beliefs, please!
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off, I know
because of my past employment at PNNL, a federal facility where
we had mandatory training on the subject. Second, you can look it
up, it is called the Hatch Act.
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the Hatch Act
they violated.
All Department of Justice employees are subject to the Hatch Act, 5
U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally prohibits Department
employees from engaging in partisan political activity while on duty,
in a federal facility or using federal property.
On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I'll look it up...
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy wrote:Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign a letter
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:Of course we do - you are one of very few libtards that
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national
security "professionals" declaring that Hunter
BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This, of
course, was FALSE and they KNEW it was false. Here is a
smoking-gun email showing that they were doing it to
illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
We don't know it's false.
think otherwise. And I don't think you believe that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose of
influencing (also called manipulating) the election. This,
BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.
expressing your honest beliefs, please!
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off, I know
because of my past employment at PNNL, a federal facility where
we had mandatory training on the subject. Second, you can look it
up, it is called the Hatch Act.
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the Hatch Act
they violated.
All Department of Justice employees are subject to the Hatch Act, 5Except:
U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally prohibits Department
employees from engaging in partisan political activity while on duty,
in a federal facility or using federal property.
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were still employees of the
US federal government.
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure
of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”'
<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276>
From your own source, Sunshine:
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the Hatch Act.
And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political
Activities, is a United States federal law. Its main provision prohibits civil-service employees in the executive branch of the federal government,[3] except the president and vice president,[4] from engaging
in some forms of political activity. It became law on August 2, 1939.
The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico.[5] It was most recently amended in 2012.'
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We don't know it's false.
On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy
wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national
security "professionals" declaring that Hunter
BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This,
of course, was FALSE and they KNEW it was false.
Here is a smoking-gun email showing that they were
doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
From your own source, Sunshine:Except:I'll look it up...Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign aOf course we do - you are one of very few libtards
that think otherwise. And I don't think you believe
that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose
of influencing (also called manipulating) the election.
This, BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.
letter expressing your honest beliefs, please!
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off, I
know because of my past employment at PNNL, a federal
facility where we had mandatory training on the subject.
Second, you can look it up, it is called the Hatch Act.
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the Hatch
Act they violated.
All Department of Justice employees are subject to the Hatch Act,
5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally prohibits
Department employees from engaging in partisan political activity
while on duty, in a federal facility or using federal property.
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were still employees of
the US federal government.
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior intelligence officials
have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent
disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has
all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”'
<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276>
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the Hatch Act.
And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political
Activities, is a United States federal law. Its main provision
prohibits civil-service employees in the executive branch of the
federal government,[3] except the president and vice president,[4]
from engaging in some forms of political activity. It became law on
August 2, 1939. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New
Mexico.[5] It was most recently amended in 2012.'
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco" IS subject
to the Hatch Act.
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal government resources
they were in violation of the law.
2. They used their status of prior employment to affect public
opinion using FALSE information.
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters can see for
themselves how they were manipulated during the 2020 election. Many,
enough to have changed the outcome, have said they WOULD NOT have
voted for Lyin' Biden if they had known the truth.
On 2023-05-05 19:23, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We don't know it's false.
On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy
wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national
security "professionals" declaring that Hunter
BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This,
of course, was FALSE and they KNEW it was false.
Here is a smoking-gun email showing that they were
doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
From your own source, Sunshine:Except:I'll look it up...Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign aOf course we do - you are one of very few libtards
that think otherwise. And I don't think you believe
that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose
of influencing (also called manipulating) the election.
This, BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.
letter expressing your honest beliefs, please!
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off, I
know because of my past employment at PNNL, a federal
facility where we had mandatory training on the subject.
Second, you can look it up, it is called the Hatch Act.
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the Hatch
Act they violated.
All Department of Justice employees are subject to the Hatch Act,
5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally prohibits
Department employees from engaging in partisan political activity
while on duty, in a federal facility or using federal property.
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were still employees of
the US federal government.
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior intelligence officials
have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent
disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has
all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”'
<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276>
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the Hatch Act.
And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political
Activities, is a United States federal law. Its main provision
prohibits civil-service employees in the executive branch of the
federal government,[3] except the president and vice president,[4]
from engaging in some forms of political activity. It became law on
August 2, 1939. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New
Mexico.[5] It was most recently amended in 2012.'
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco" IS subjectShe's held that position "since April 21, 2021"
to the Hatch Act.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>
The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...
...at which time she was in the private sector:
'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security analyst.'
'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm O'Melveny & Myers as a partner, where she co-chaired the firm's Data Security and Privacy group'
'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee was
held on March 9, 2021,[ and she was confirmed by the Senate on April 20, 2021. She was sworn in the next day.'
Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet, Sunshine?
No? OK!
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal government resources1.A Got any proof that any federal government resources were used, Sunshine?
they were in violation of the law.
2. They used their status of prior employment to affect public2.A Their "status of prior employment" is irrelevant to your Hatch Act claim.
opinion using FALSE information.
2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters can see for themselves how they were manipulated during the 2020 election. Many, enough to have changed the outcome, have said they WOULD NOT haveGot any proof of that last claim, Sunshine.
voted for Lyin' Biden if they had known the truth.
You should really quit while you're behind.
:-)
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 7:38:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 19:23, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We don't know it's false.
On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy
wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national
security "professionals" declaring that Hunter
BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This,
of course, was FALSE and they KNEW it was false.
Here is a smoking-gun email showing that they were
doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
From your own source, Sunshine:Except:I'll look it up...Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign aOf course we do - you are one of very few libtards
that think otherwise. And I don't think you believe
that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose
of influencing (also called manipulating) the election.
This, BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.
letter expressing your honest beliefs, please!
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off, I
know because of my past employment at PNNL, a federal
facility where we had mandatory training on the subject.
Second, you can look it up, it is called the Hatch Act.
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the Hatch
Act they violated.
All Department of Justice employees are subject to the Hatch Act,
5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally prohibits
Department employees from engaging in partisan political activity
while on duty, in a federal facility or using federal property.
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were still employees of
the US federal government.
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior intelligence officials
have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent
disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has
all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”'
<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276>
She's held that position "since April 21, 2021"
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the Hatch Act.
And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political
Activities, is a United States federal law. Its main provision
prohibits civil-service employees in the executive branch of the
federal government,[3] except the president and vice president,[4]
from engaging in some forms of political activity. It became law on
August 2, 1939. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New
Mexico.[5] It was most recently amended in 2012.'
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco" IS subject
to the Hatch Act.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>
The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...
...at which time she was in the private sector:
'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security analyst.'
'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm O'Melveny & Myers as a
partner, where she co-chaired the firm's Data Security and Privacy group'
'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee was
held on March 9, 2021,[ and she was confirmed by the Senate on April 20,
2021. She was sworn in the next day.'
Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet, Sunshine?
No? OK!
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal government resources1.A Got any proof that any federal government resources were used, Sunshine? >>> 2. They used their status of prior employment to affect public
they were in violation of the law.
opinion using FALSE information.2.A Their "status of prior employment" is irrelevant to your Hatch Act
claim.
2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters can see forGot any proof of that last claim, Sunshine.
themselves how they were manipulated during the 2020 election. Many,
enough to have changed the outcome, have said they WOULD NOT have
voted for Lyin' Biden if they had known the truth.
You should really quit while you're behind.
:-)
There were FIFTY-ONE signatories to that letter, Fool. Do YOU have proof that ALL of them were not federal employees at the time? I didn't think so...
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 7:38:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 19:23, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We don't know it's false.
On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy
wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national
security "professionals" declaring that Hunter
BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This,
of course, was FALSE and they KNEW it was false.
Here is a smoking-gun email showing that they were
doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
From your own source, Sunshine:Except:I'll look it up...Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign aOf course we do - you are one of very few libtards
that think otherwise. And I don't think you believe
that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose
of influencing (also called manipulating) the election.
This, BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.
letter expressing your honest beliefs, please!
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off, I
know because of my past employment at PNNL, a federal
facility where we had mandatory training on the subject.
Second, you can look it up, it is called the Hatch Act.
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the Hatch
Act they violated.
All Department of Justice employees are subject to the Hatch Act,
5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally prohibits
Department employees from engaging in partisan political activity
while on duty, in a federal facility or using federal property.
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were still employees of
the US federal government.
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior intelligence officials
have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent
disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has
all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”'
<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276>
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the Hatch Act.
And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political
Activities, is a United States federal law. Its main provision
prohibits civil-service employees in the executive branch of the
federal government,[3] except the president and vice president,[4]
from engaging in some forms of political activity. It became law on
August 2, 1939. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New
Mexico.[5] It was most recently amended in 2012.'
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco" IS subjectShe's held that position "since April 21, 2021"
to the Hatch Act.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>
The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...
...at which time she was in the private sector:
'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security analyst.'
'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm O'Melveny & Myers as a partner, where she co-chaired the firm's Data Security and Privacy group'
'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee was held on March 9, 2021,[ and she was confirmed by the Senate on April 20, 2021. She was sworn in the next day.'
Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet, Sunshine?
No? OK!
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal government resources1.A Got any proof that any federal government resources were used, Sunshine?
they were in violation of the law.
2. They used their status of prior employment to affect public2.A Their "status of prior employment" is irrelevant to your Hatch Act claim.
opinion using FALSE information.
2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters can see for themselves how they were manipulated during the 2020 election. Many, enough to have changed the outcome, have said they WOULD NOT haveGot any proof of that last claim, Sunshine.
voted for Lyin' Biden if they had known the truth.
You should really quit while you're behind.
:-)There were FIFTY-ONE signatories to that letter, Fool. Do YOU have proof that ALL of them were not federal employees at the time? I didn't think so...
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:04:59 AM UTC-7, Tommy wrote:We don't know it's false.
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 7:38:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 19:23, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy
wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE
national security "professionals" declaring
that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian
disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE
and they KNEW it was false. Here is a
smoking-gun email showing that they were
doing it to illegally influence the 2020
election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
From your own source, Sunshine:Except:I'll look it up...Cite for that law that would make it illegal to signOf course we do - you are one of very few
libtards that think otherwise. And I don't think
you believe that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole
purpose of influencing (also called manipulating)
the election. This, BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.
a letter expressing your honest beliefs, please!
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off,
I know because of my past employment at PNNL, a
federal facility where we had mandatory training on the
subject. Second, you can look it up, it is called the
Hatch Act.
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the
Hatch Act they violated.
All Department of Justice employees are subject to the
Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally
prohibits Department employees from engaging in partisan
political activity while on duty, in a federal facility or
using federal property.
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were still
employees of the US federal government.
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior intelligence
officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief
that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to
Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian
information operation.”'
<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276>
There were FIFTY-ONE signatories to that letter, Fool. Do YOU haveShe's held that position "since April 21, 2021"
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the Hatch Act.
And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ
employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious
Political Activities, is a United States federal law. Its
main provision prohibits civil-service employees in the
executive branch of the federal government,[3] except the
president and vice president,[4] from engaging in some forms
of political activity. It became law on August 2, 1939. The
law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico.[5] It was
most recently amended in 2012.'
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco" IS
subject to the Hatch Act.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>
The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...
...at which time she was in the private sector:
'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security analyst.'
'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm O'Melveny & Myers
as a partner, where she co-chaired the firm's Data Security and
Privacy group'
'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate Judiciary
Committee was held on March 9, 2021,[ and she was confirmed by
the Senate on April 20, 2021. She was sworn in the next day.'
Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet, Sunshine?
No? OK!
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal government1.A Got any proof that any federal government resources were
resources they were in violation of the law.
used, Sunshine?
2. They used their status of prior employment to affect public2.A Their "status of prior employment" is irrelevant to your
opinion using FALSE information.
Hatch Act claim.
2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters can seeGot any proof of that last claim, Sunshine.
for themselves how they were manipulated during the 2020
election. Many, enough to have changed the outcome, have said
they WOULD NOT have voted for Lyin' Biden if they had known the
truth.
You should really quit while you're behind.
:-)
proof that ALL of them were not federal employees at the time? I
didn't think so...
And the BIGGER issue is the public's right to know that this was a coordinated effort by government officials, current or former, to
deceive the public and manipulate an election with FALSE
information.
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 2:55:35 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 9:42:58 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-07 09:22, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 8:27:17 AM UTC-7, bruce bowserwrote: >>>>>> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 7:38:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 19:23, Tommy wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 1:01:24 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:20:03 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-06 09:09, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:04:59 AM UTC-7, Tommy
wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan
Tommy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7,
Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7,
oss- wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> national security "professionals" declaring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and they KNEW it was false. Here is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoking-gun email showing that they were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing it to illegally influence the 2020 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-b
think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you believe that.We don't know it's false.
Of course we do - you are one of very few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libtards that think otherwise. And I don't
sole >>>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose of influencing (also called
Additionally, they signed the letter for the
manipulating) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election. This, BY ITSELF, is
ILLEGAL. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite for that law that would make it
illegal to sign >>>>>>>>>>>>> a letter expressing your honest
beliefs, please! >>>>>>>>>>>>
off, >>>>>>>>>>>> I know because of my past employment at PNNL,LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First
a >>>>>>>>>>>> federal facility where we had mandatory training
on the >>>>>>>>>>>> subject. Second, you can look it up, it is
called the >>>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act.
the >>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act they violated.I'll look it up...
...if you can state in plain English what clause of
the >>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which
All Department of Justice employees are subject to
generally >>>>>>>>>> prohibits Department employees from
engaging in partisan >>>>>>>>>> political activity while on
duty, in a federal facility or >>>>>>>>>> using federal
property. >>>>>>>>> Except:
still >>>>>>>>> employees of the US federal government.
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were
intelligence >>>>>>>>> officials have signed on to a letter
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior
outlining their belief >>>>>>>>> that the recent disclosure of
emails allegedly belonging to >>>>>>>>> Joe Biden’s son “has
all the classic earmarks of a Russian >>>>>>>>> information operation.”' >>>>>>>>>
sian -disinfo-430276> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>><https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-rus
Hatch Act. >>>>>>>>>From your own source, Sunshine:
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the
Its >>>>>>>>> main provision prohibits civil-service employeesAnd just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ >>>>>>>>> employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious >>>>>>>>> Political Activities, is a United States federal law.
in the >>>>>>>>> executive branch of the federal government,[3]
except the >>>>>>>>> president and vice president,[4] from
engaging in some forms >>>>>>>>> of political activity. It
became law on August 2, 1939. The >>>>>>>>> law was named for
Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico.[5] It was >>>>>>>>> most
recently amended in 2012.' >>>>>>>>>
Monaco" IS >>>>>>>> subject to the Hatch Act.<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa
analyst.' >>>>>>>She's held that position "since April 21, 2021"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>
The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...
...at which time she was in the private sector:
'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security
O'Melveny & Myers >>>>>>> as a partner, where she co-chaired'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm
the firm's Data Security and >>>>>>> Privacy group'
Judiciary >>>>>>> Committee was held on March 9, 2021,[ and she
'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate
was confirmed by >>>>>>> the Senate on April 20, 2021. She was
sworn in the next day.' >>>>>>>
Sunshine? >>>>>>>Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet,
government >>>>>>>> resources they were in violation of theNo? OK!
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal
law. >>>>>>> 1.A Got any proof that any federal government
resources were >>>>>>> used, Sunshine?
affect public >>>>>>>> opinion using FALSE information.2. They used their status of prior employment to
your >>>>>>> Hatch Act claim.2.A Their "status of prior employment" is irrelevant to
can see >>>>>>>> for themselves how they were manipulated
2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters
during the 2020 >>>>>>>> election. Many, enough to have changed
the outcome, have said >>>>>>>> they WOULD NOT have voted for
Lyin' Biden if they had known the >>>>>>>> truth.
Do YOU have >>>>>> proof that ALL of them were not federalGot any proof of that last claim, Sunshine.There were FIFTY-ONE signatories to that letter, Fool.
You should really quit while you're behind.
:-)
employees at the time? I >>>>>> didn't think so...
this was a >>>>> coordinated effort by government officials,
And the BIGGER issue is the public's right to know that
current or former, to >>>>> deceive the public and manipulate
an election with FALSE >>>>> information.
wrote and signed >>>> the letter and any government official atYou've yet to show any coordination between those who
the time. Michael Morell >>>> wasn't a government official
when he emailed Brennan, who also wasn't a >>>> government
official at the time. >>>>
that anyone had >>>> violated the Hatch Act.You've yet to show that anything in the letter was false.
But I can see why you want to run away from your claim
PROVEN by Mueller after spending TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS investigating it. >>> >>> You have not PROVEN that the HatchLOL! The VERY FIRST POST contained the email showing said coordinating, Fool. >>>
The ENTIRE Russian Collusion hoax was FALSE - this has been
Act WASN'T violated. >> Any names? dates? locations? You
haven't ever proven SHIT. >> Never any names, any dates, any
locations. Just name-calling. Like "Deep Swamp".
Oh, REALLY? Think again, Bozo:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-fbi-agent-timothy-thibault -resigns/
"But these officials also said that Thibault had reached
retirement age, and they added that all of those who retire
hand over their badge and gun and are escorted out of the
building."
What part of "FIRED" don't you understand?Only one mention of that word in that article.
A statement from Thibault's counsel said he was "not fired, not
forced to retire and not asked to retire," and he walked out of the
FBI building "by himself."
"Claims to the contrary are false," the statement said.
Now, what was it you were asking, Betty?
LOL! Don't you fuckers know the phrase "retire or be fired"? There
was NOTHING "voluntary" about his "retirement!"
On 2023-05-09 20:08, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 2:55:35 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 9:42:58 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-fbi-agent-timothy-thibault-resigns/
On 2023-05-07 09:22, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 8:27:17 AM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 1:01:24 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss- >>>> wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:20:03 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-06 09:09, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:04:59 AM UTC-7, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 7:38:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 19:23, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> national security "professionals" declaring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and they KNEW it was false. Here is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoking-gun email showing that they were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing it to illegally influence the 2020 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election:
off, >>>>>>>>>>>> I know because of my past employment at PNNL, a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal facility where we had mandatory training onWe don't know it's false.
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! FirstOf course we do - you are one of very few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libtards that think otherwise. And I don't think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you believe that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose of influencing (also called manipulating) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election. This, BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a letter expressing your honest beliefs, please! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the >>>>>>>>>>>> subject. Second, you can look it up, it is called
the >>>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act.
or >>>>>>>>>> using federal property.I'll look it up...
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act they violated.
All Department of Justice employees are subject to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prohibits Department employees from engaging in partisan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> political activity while on duty, in a federal facility
belief >>>>>>>>> that the recent disclosure of emails allegedlyExcept:
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were still >>>>>>>>>>>>> employees of the US federal government.
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior intelligence >>>>>>>>>>>>> officials have signed on to a letter outlining their
belonging to >>>>>>>>> Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic
earmarks of a Russian >>>>>>>>> information operation.”' >>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian >>>> -disinfo-430276> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
Act. >>>>>>>>>From your own source, Sunshine:
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the Hatch
forms >>>>>>>>> of political activity. It became law on August 2,And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ >>>>>>>>>>>>> employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious >>>>>>>>>>>>> Political Activities, is a United States federal law. Its >>>>>>>>>>>>> main provision prohibits civil-service employees in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> executive branch of the federal government,[3] except the >>>>>>>>>>>>> president and vice president,[4] from engaging in some
1939. The >>>>>>>>> law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New
Mexico.[5] It was >>>>>>>>> most recently amended in 2012.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>
IS >>>>>>>> subject to the Hatch Act.<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco"
analyst.' >>>>>>>She's held that position "since April 21, 2021"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>
The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...
...at which time she was in the private sector:
'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security
Myers >>>>>>> as a partner, where she co-chaired the firm's Data'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm O'Melveny &
Security and >>>>>>> Privacy group'
by >>>>>>> the Senate on April 20, 2021. She was sworn in the next
'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate Judiciary >>>>>>>>>>> Committee was held on March 9, 2021,[ and she was confirmed
day.' >>>>>>>
were >>>>>>> used, Sunshine?Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>
No? OK!
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal government >>>>>>>>>>>> resources they were in violation of the law.1.A Got any proof that any federal government resources
public >>>>>>>> opinion using FALSE information.2. They used their status of prior employment to affect
your >>>>>>> Hatch Act claim.2.A Their "status of prior employment" is irrelevant to
see >>>>>>>> for themselves how they were manipulated during the
2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters can
2020 >>>>>>>> election. Many, enough to have changed the outcome,
have said >>>>>>>> they WOULD NOT have voted for Lyin' Biden if
they had known the >>>>>>>> truth.
YOU have >>>>>> proof that ALL of them were not federal employeesGot any proof of that last claim, Sunshine.There were FIFTY-ONE signatories to that letter, Fool. Do
You should really quit while you're behind.
:-)
at the time? I >>>>>> didn't think so...
was a >>>>> coordinated effort by government officials, current or
And the BIGGER issue is the public's right to know that this
former, to >>>>> deceive the public and manipulate an election with >>>> FALSE >>>>> information.
and signed >>>> the letter and any government official at the time. >>>> Michael Morell >>>> wasn't a government official when he emailedYou've yet to show any coordination between those who wrote
Brennan, who also wasn't a >>>> government official at the time. >>>>>>>>
anyone had >>>> violated the Hatch Act.You've yet to show that anything in the letter was false.
But I can see why you want to run away from your claim that
coordinating, Fool. >>>LOL! The VERY FIRST POST contained the email showing said
PROVEN by Mueller after spending TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARSThe ENTIRE Russian Collusion hoax was FALSE - this has been
investigating it. >>> >>> You have not PROVEN that the Hatch Act
WASN'T violated. >> Any names? dates? locations? You haven't ever
proven SHIT. >> Never any names, any dates, any locations. Just
name-calling. Like "Deep Swamp".
Oh, REALLY? Think again, Bozo:
Only one mention of that word in that article."But these officials also said that Thibault had reached retirement >>>> age, and they added that all of those who retire hand over their
badge and gun and are escorted out of the building."
What part of "FIRED" don't you understand?
A statement from Thibault's counsel said he was "not fired, not forced
to retire and not asked to retire," and he walked out of the FBI
building "by himself."
"Claims to the contrary are false," the statement said.
Now, what was it you were asking, Betty?
LOL! Don't you fuckers know the phrase "retire or be fired"? There was NOTHING "voluntary" about his "retirement!"That is supported by literally nothing you've posted.
Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 2:55:35 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 9:42:58 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-07 09:22, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 8:27:17 AM UTC-7, bruce bowserwrote: >>>>>> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 7:38:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 19:23, Tommy wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 1:01:24 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:20:03 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-06 09:09, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:04:59 AM UTC-7, Tommy
wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan
Tommy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7,
Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7,
think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you believe that.We don't know it's false.On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote:
A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> national security "professionals" declaring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and they KNEW it was false. Here is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoking-gun email showing that they were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing it to illegally influence the 2020 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-b oss- wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course we do - you are one of very few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libtards that think otherwise. And I don't
sole >>>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose of influencing (also called manipulating) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election. This, BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite for that law that would make it
Additionally, they signed the letter for the
illegal to sign >>>>>>>>>>>>> a letter expressing your honest beliefs, please! >>>>>>>>>>>>
off, >>>>>>>>>>>> I know because of my past employment at PNNL,LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First
a >>>>>>>>>>>> federal facility where we had mandatory training
on the >>>>>>>>>>>> subject. Second, you can look it up, it is called the >>>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act.
the >>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act they violated.I'll look it up...
...if you can state in plain English what clause of
the >>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally >>>>>>>>>> prohibits Department employees from
All Department of Justice employees are subject to
engaging in partisan >>>>>>>>>> political activity while on
duty, in a federal facility or >>>>>>>>>> using federal
property. >>>>>>>>> Except:
still >>>>>>>>> employees of the US federal government.
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were
intelligence >>>>>>>>> officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief >>>>>>>>> that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to >>>>>>>>> Joe Biden’s son “has
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior
all the classic earmarks of a Russian >>>>>>>>> information operation.”' >>>>>>>>>
Hatch Act. >>>>>>>>>From your own source, Sunshine:<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-rus sian -disinfo-430276> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the
Its >>>>>>>>> main provision prohibits civil-service employeesAnd just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ >>>>>>>>> employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious >>>>>>>>> Political Activities, is a United States federal law.
in the >>>>>>>>> executive branch of the federal government,[3] except the >>>>>>>>> president and vice president,[4] from
engaging in some forms >>>>>>>>> of political activity. It
became law on August 2, 1939. The >>>>>>>>> law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico.[5] It was >>>>>>>>> most
recently amended in 2012.' >>>>>>>>>
Monaco" IS >>>>>>>> subject to the Hatch Act.<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa
analyst.' >>>>>>>She's held that position "since April 21, 2021"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>
The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...
...at which time she was in the private sector:
'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security
O'Melveny & Myers >>>>>>> as a partner, where she co-chaired'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm
the firm's Data Security and >>>>>>> Privacy group'
Judiciary >>>>>>> Committee was held on March 9, 2021,[ and she
'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate
was confirmed by >>>>>>> the Senate on April 20, 2021. She was
sworn in the next day.' >>>>>>>
Sunshine? >>>>>>>Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet,
government >>>>>>>> resources they were in violation of theNo? OK!
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal
law. >>>>>>> 1.A Got any proof that any federal government
resources were >>>>>>> used, Sunshine?
affect public >>>>>>>> opinion using FALSE information.2. They used their status of prior employment to
your >>>>>>> Hatch Act claim.2.A Their "status of prior employment" is irrelevant to
can see >>>>>>>> for themselves how they were manipulated
2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters
during the 2020 >>>>>>>> election. Many, enough to have changed
the outcome, have said >>>>>>>> they WOULD NOT have voted for
Lyin' Biden if they had known the >>>>>>>> truth.
Do YOU have >>>>>> proof that ALL of them were not federalGot any proof of that last claim, Sunshine.There were FIFTY-ONE signatories to that letter, Fool.
You should really quit while you're behind.
:-)
employees at the time? I >>>>>> didn't think so...
this was a >>>>> coordinated effort by government officials,
And the BIGGER issue is the public's right to know that
current or former, to >>>>> deceive the public and manipulate
an election with FALSE >>>>> information.
wrote and signed >>>> the letter and any government official atYou've yet to show any coordination between those who
the time. Michael Morell >>>> wasn't a government official
when he emailed Brennan, who also wasn't a >>>> government
official at the time. >>>>
that anyone had >>>> violated the Hatch Act.You've yet to show that anything in the letter was false.
But I can see why you want to run away from your claim
Act WASN'T violated. >> Any names? dates? locations? YouLOL! The VERY FIRST POST contained the email showing said coordinating, Fool. >>>
The ENTIRE Russian Collusion hoax was FALSE - this has been PROVEN by Mueller after spending TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS investigating it. >>> >>> You have not PROVEN that the Hatch
haven't ever proven SHIT. >> Never any names, any dates, any locations. Just name-calling. Like "Deep Swamp".
Oh, REALLY? Think again, Bozo:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-fbi-agent-timothy-thibault -resigns/
"But these officials also said that Thibault had reached
retirement age, and they added that all of those who retire
hand over their badge and gun and are escorted out of the
building."
What part of "FIRED" don't you understand?Only one mention of that word in that article.
A statement from Thibault's counsel said he was "not fired, not
forced to retire and not asked to retire," and he walked out of the
FBI building "by himself."
"Claims to the contrary are false," the statement said.
Now, what was it you were asking, Betty?
LOL! Don't you fuckers know the phrase "retire or be fired"? ThereLying again, Betty.
was NOTHING "voluntary" about his "retirement!"
^^^^^
For educational purposes; the correct use of "again".
On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 8:24:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-09 20:08, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 2:55:35 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:That is supported by literally nothing you've posted.
Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 9:42:58 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-fbi-agent-timothy-thibault-resigns/
On 2023-05-07 09:22, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 8:27:17 AM UTC-7, bruce bowser wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 1:01:24 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss- >>>>>> wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:20:03 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-06 09:09, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:04:59 AM UTC-7, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 7:38:10 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 19:23, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7, Tommy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> national security "professionals" declaring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and they KNEW it was false. Here is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoking-gun email showing that they were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing it to illegally influence the 2020 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election:
off, >>>>>>>>>>>> I know because of my past employment at PNNL, a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal facility where we had mandatory training onWe don't know it's false.
LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! FirstOf course we do - you are one of very few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libtards that think otherwise. And I don't think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you believe that.
Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose of influencing (also called manipulating) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election. This, BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a letter expressing your honest beliefs, please! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the >>>>>>>>>>>> subject. Second, you can look it up, it is called >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act.
or >>>>>>>>>> using federal property.I'll look it up...
...if you can state in plain English what clause of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act they violated.
All Department of Justice employees are subject to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prohibits Department employees from engaging in partisan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> political activity while on duty, in a federal facility
belief >>>>>>>>> that the recent disclosure of emails allegedlyExcept:
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employees of the US federal government.
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior intelligence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials have signed on to a letter outlining their
belonging to >>>>>>>>> Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic
earmarks of a Russian >>>>>>>>> information operation.”' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian >>>>>> -disinfo-430276> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
Act. >>>>>>>>>From your own source, Sunshine:
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the Hatch
forms >>>>>>>>> of political activity. It became law on August 2,And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> employees).
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Political Activities, is a United States federal law. Its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> main provision prohibits civil-service employees in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> executive branch of the federal government,[3] except the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> president and vice president,[4] from engaging in some
1939. The >>>>>>>>> law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New
Mexico.[5] It was >>>>>>>>> most recently amended in 2012.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
analyst.' >>>>>>>She's held that position "since April 21, 2021"<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>
You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco" >>>>>> IS >>>>>>>> subject to the Hatch Act.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>
The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...
...at which time she was in the private sector:
'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security
Myers >>>>>>> as a partner, where she co-chaired the firm's Data'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm O'Melveny &
Security and >>>>>>> Privacy group'
were >>>>>>> used, Sunshine?
'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate Judiciary >>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee was held on March 9, 2021,[ and she was confirmed >>>>>> by >>>>>>> the Senate on April 20, 2021. She was sworn in the next >>>>>> day.' >>>>>>>
Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet, Sunshine? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
No? OK!
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal government >>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources they were in violation of the law.1.A Got any proof that any federal government resources
public >>>>>>>> opinion using FALSE information.2. They used their status of prior employment to affect
your >>>>>>> Hatch Act claim.2.A Their "status of prior employment" is irrelevant to
see >>>>>>>> for themselves how they were manipulated during the
2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters can
2020 >>>>>>>> election. Many, enough to have changed the outcome,
have said >>>>>>>> they WOULD NOT have voted for Lyin' Biden if
they had known the >>>>>>>> truth.
YOU have >>>>>> proof that ALL of them were not federal employeesGot any proof of that last claim, Sunshine.There were FIFTY-ONE signatories to that letter, Fool. Do
You should really quit while you're behind.
:-)
at the time? I >>>>>> didn't think so...
was a >>>>> coordinated effort by government officials, current or >>>>>> former, to >>>>> deceive the public and manipulate an election with >>>>>> FALSE >>>>> information.
And the BIGGER issue is the public's right to know that this
and signed >>>> the letter and any government official at the time. >>>>>> Michael Morell >>>> wasn't a government official when he emailedYou've yet to show any coordination between those who wrote
Brennan, who also wasn't a >>>> government official at the time. >>>>>>>>>>
anyone had >>>> violated the Hatch Act.You've yet to show that anything in the letter was false.
But I can see why you want to run away from your claim that
coordinating, Fool. >>>LOL! The VERY FIRST POST contained the email showing said
PROVEN by Mueller after spending TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARSThe ENTIRE Russian Collusion hoax was FALSE - this has been
investigating it. >>> >>> You have not PROVEN that the Hatch Act
WASN'T violated. >> Any names? dates? locations? You haven't ever
proven SHIT. >> Never any names, any dates, any locations. Just
name-calling. Like "Deep Swamp".
Oh, REALLY? Think again, Bozo:
Only one mention of that word in that article."But these officials also said that Thibault had reached retirement >>>>>> age, and they added that all of those who retire hand over their
badge and gun and are escorted out of the building."
What part of "FIRED" don't you understand?
A statement from Thibault's counsel said he was "not fired, not forced >>>> to retire and not asked to retire," and he walked out of the FBI
building "by himself."
"Claims to the contrary are false," the statement said.
Now, what was it you were asking, Betty?
LOL! Don't you fuckers know the phrase "retire or be fired"? There was NOTHING "voluntary" about his "retirement!"
On the contrary, Fool - the article detailed it perfectly:
"Thibault, who worked in the FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., had recently been removed from his position as assistant special agent in charge at the FBI's Washington Field Office, which covers all of the District of Columbia and Northern Virginia.
Thibault came under fire earlier this year from Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley who had accused him of "improper conduct" in the Hunter Biden investigation, alleging that Thibault had tried to shut down any investigatory activity."
The "resignation" was merely an obvious move on Thibault's part to preserve retirement benefits that would have been lost in a firing.
On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 3:35:17 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 2:55:35 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 9:42:58 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-07 09:22, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 8:27:17 AM UTC-7, bruce bowserwrote: >>>> On 2023-05-06 09:09, Tommy wrote:
wrote:
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 1:01:24 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:20:03 AM UTC-7, Alan
wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 7:38:10 PM UTC-7,On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 9:04:59 AM UTC-7, Tommy
Alan wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 19:23, Tommy wrote:
wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 17:31, Tommy wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 6:10:23 PM UTC-7, Alan
Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-05-05 14:55, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:11:46 AM UTC-7,
Tommy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:On 2023-05-05 10:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 10:06:51 AM UTC-7,
Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:56:52 AM UTC-7,
declaring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Hunter BooBoo's laptop wasOn 2023-05-04 19:01, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> national security "professionals"
Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disinformation. This, of course,
was FALSE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and they KNEW it was false.
Here is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoking-gun email showing that
they were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing it to illegally influence
the 2020 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election:
ia-b oss-https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-c
wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking
think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you believe that.We don't know it's false.
Of course we do - you are one of very few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libtards that think otherwise. And I don't
sole >>>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose of influencing (also called manipulating) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election. This, BY ITSELF,
Additionally, they signed the letter for the
is ILLEGAL. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite for that law that would make
it illegal to sign >>>>>>>>>>>>> a letter expressing your
honest beliefs, please! >>>>>>>>>>>>
First off, >>>>>>>>>>>> I know because of my pastLOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!!
employment at PNNL, a >>>>>>>>>>>> federal facility where
we had mandatory training on the >>>>>>>>>>>> subject.
Second, you can look it up, it is called the >>>>>>>>>>>>
Hatch Act. >>>>>>>>>>> I'll look it up...
clause of the >>>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act they violated.
...if you can state in plain English what
to the >>>>>>>>>> Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a),
All Department of Justice employees are subject
which generally >>>>>>>>>> prohibits Department employees
from engaging in partisan >>>>>>>>>> political activity
while on duty, in a federal facility or >>>>>>>>>> using
federal property. >>>>>>>>> Except:
still >>>>>>>>> employees of the US federal government.
None of the 51 people who signed the letter were
intelligence >>>>>>>>> officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief >>>>>>>>> that the recent disclosure
'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior
of emails allegedly belonging to >>>>>>>>> Joe Biden’s son
“has all the classic earmarks of a Russian >>>>>>>>>
information operation.”' >>>>>>>>>
-rus sian -disinfo-430276> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>><https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story
Hatch Act. >>>>>>>>>From your own source, Sunshine:
'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'
'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the
DoJ >>>>>>>>> employees).And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to
Pernicious >>>>>>>>> Political Activities, is a United
'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent
States federal law. Its >>>>>>>>> main provision prohibits civil-service employees in the >>>>>>>>> executive branch
of the federal government,[3] except the >>>>>>>>>
president and vice president,[4] from engaging in some
forms >>>>>>>>> of political activity. It became law on
August 2, 1939. The >>>>>>>>> law was named for Senator
Carl Hatch of New Mexico.[5] It was >>>>>>>>> most recently
amended in 2012.' >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act> >>>>>>>>>
Monaco" IS >>>>>>>> subject to the Hatch Act.You really are bad at this, Sunshine.
No, YOU are: "current Deputy Attorney General Lisa
O'Melveny & Myers >>>>>>> as a partner, where sheShe's held that position "since April 21, 2021"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>
The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...
...at which time she was in the private sector:
'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security analyst.' >>>>>>>
'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm
co-chaired the firm's Data Security and >>>>>>> Privacy
group' >>>>>>>
Judiciary >>>>>>> Committee was held on March 9, 2021,[ and'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate
she was confirmed by >>>>>>> the Senate on April 20, 2021.
She was sworn in the next day.' >>>>>>>
Sunshine? >>>>>>>Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet,
government >>>>>>>> resources they were in violation of theNo? OK!
Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal
law. >>>>>>> 1.A Got any proof that any federal government resources were >>>>>>> used, Sunshine?
affect public >>>>>>>> opinion using FALSE information.2. They used their status of prior employment to
irrelevant to your >>>>>>> Hatch Act claim.2.A Their "status of prior employment" is
voters can see >>>>>>>> for themselves how they were
2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?
All of this deserves public disclosure so that
manipulated during the 2020 >>>>>>>> election. Many, enough
to have changed the outcome, have said >>>>>>>> they WOULD
NOT have voted for Lyin' Biden if they had known the
Fool. Do YOU have >>>>>> proof that ALL of them were notThere were FIFTY-ONE signatories to that letter,truth. >>>>>>> Got any proof of that last claim, Sunshine. >>>>>>>You should really quit while you're behind.
:-)
federal employees at the time? I >>>>>> didn't think so...
that this was a >>>>> coordinated effort by government
And the BIGGER issue is the public's right to know
officials, current or former, to >>>>> deceive the public
and manipulate an election with FALSE >>>>> information.
wrote and signed >>>> the letter and any governmentYou've yet to show any coordination between those who
official at the time. Michael Morell >>>> wasn't a
government official when he emailed Brennan, who also
wasn't a >>>> government official at the time. >>>>
false. >>>>You've yet to show that anything in the letter was
that anyone had >>>> violated the Hatch Act.But I can see why you want to run away from your claim
said coordinating, Fool. >>>LOL! The VERY FIRST POST contained the email showing
been PROVEN by Mueller after spending TENS OF MILLIONS OFThe ENTIRE Russian Collusion hoax was FALSE - this has
DOLLARS investigating it. >>> >>> You have not PROVEN that
the Hatch Act WASN'T violated. >> Any names? dates?
locations? You haven't ever proven SHIT. >> Never any
names, any dates, any locations. Just name-calling. Like
"Deep Swamp".
Oh, REALLY? Think again, Bozo:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-fbi-agent-timothy-thib
ault -resigns/
"But these officials also said that Thibault had reached
retirement age, and they added that all of those who retire
hand over their badge and gun and are escorted out of the building."
What part of "FIRED" don't you understand?Only one mention of that word in that article.
A statement from Thibault's counsel said he was "not fired, not
forced to retire and not asked to retire," and he walked out of
the FBI building "by himself."
"Claims to the contrary are false," the statement said.
Now, what was it you were asking, Betty?
LOL! Don't you fuckers know the phrase "retire or be fired"?Lying again, Betty.
There was NOTHING "voluntary" about his "retirement!"
^^^^^
For educational purposes; the correct use of "again".
Hey BirdBrain, that isn't even a complete sentence, so don't lecture
me on the proper use of English.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 73:29:45 |
| Calls: | 6,714 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,246 |
| Messages: | 5,357,174 |