The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job: https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-joe-biden.aspx
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job: https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-joe-biden.aspxFunny you're not gloating about Rasmussen anymore, huh?
Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-joe-biden.aspx
Drumpf left the WH with a 34% approval rating; you really know how to
elect shit presidents.
Your whole system of government is broken and you keep voting to keep
it that way.
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen anymore, huh?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-joe-biden.aspx
Funny that you AREN'T!
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen anymore, huh?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-joe-biden.aspx
Funny that you AREN'T!Why would I, Sunshine?
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:numbers have TANKED.
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Why would I, Sunshine?
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen anymore, huh?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-joe-biden.aspx
Funny that you AREN'T!
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliable Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin' Biden the highest marks. Are you changing your collective minds now (such as they are)? The bottom line is that the senile pervert's
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:numbers have TANKED.
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Why would I, Sunshine?
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen anymore, huh?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-joe-biden.aspx
Funny that you AREN'T!
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliable Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin' Biden the highest marks. Are you changing your collective minds now (such as they are)? The bottom line is that the senile pervert's
But you insist that Rasmussen is reliable, Sunshine.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 10:37:24 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:numbers have TANKED.
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Why would I, Sunshine?
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen anymore, huh?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-joe-biden.aspx
Funny that you AREN'T!
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliable Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin' Biden the highest marks. Are you changing your collective minds now (such as they are)? The bottom line is that the senile pervert's
But you insist that Rasmussen is reliable, Sunshine.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
LOL! I just report the data, Fool. Gallup IS a reliable pollster.
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 9:46:02 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:
Drumpf left the WH with a 34% approval rating; you really know how
to elect shit presidents.
Your whole system of government is broken and you keep voting to
keep it that way.
Hey BirdBrain, what you are say,
in essence,
is that the senile
pervert is FUCKED!
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 10:37:24 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-jo e-biden.aspx >>>> Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:
anymore, huh? >>> >>> Funny that you AREN'T!
Why would I, Sunshine?
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliableBut you insist that Rasmussen is reliable, Sunshine.
Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin' Biden
the highest marks. Are you changing your collective minds now
(such as they are)? The bottom line is that the senile pervert's
numbers have TANKED.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
LOL! I just report the data, Fool. Gallup IS a reliable pollster.
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 10:37:24 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:anymore, huh? >>> >>> Funny that you AREN'T!
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-jo e-biden.aspx >>>> Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen
Why would I, Sunshine?
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliableBut you insist that Rasmussen is reliable, Sunshine.
Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin' Biden
the highest marks. Are you changing your collective minds now
(such as they are)? The bottom line is that the senile pervert's numbers have TANKED.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
LOL! I just report the data, Fool. Gallup IS a reliable pollster.There was a time when you were that minority of Merkins approving a
senile pervert in office.
"Trump Leaves on a Personal Low Note
The 34% job approval rating for Trump in Gallup's Jan. 4-15 poll is one point lower than his prior lowest single rating, registered on several occasions in late 2017. "
- Gallup
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 3:04:57 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:e-biden.aspx >>>> Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 10:37:24 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-jo
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:
There was a time when you were that minority of Merkins approvinganymore, huh? >>> >>> Funny that you AREN'T!
But you insist that Rasmussen is reliable, Sunshine.Why would I, Sunshine?
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliable
Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin'
Biden the highest marks. Are you changing your collective
minds now (such as they are)? The bottom line is that the
senile pervert's numbers have TANKED.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
LOL! I just report the data, Fool. Gallup IS a reliable
pollster.
a senile pervert in office.
"Trump Leaves on a Personal Low Note The 34% job approval rating
for Trump in Gallup's Jan. 4-15 poll is one point lower than his
prior lowest single rating, registered on several occasions in late
2017. " - Gallup
The senile pervert Lyin' Biden is wanting voters to put him into
office for another FOUR YEARS while most people don't want him to
run. Even you libtards here WON'T go on the record saying that you
WANT the pervert to run again.
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 3:04:57 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 10:37:24 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-rating
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:
s-jo e-biden.aspx >>>> Funny you're not gloating about
Rasmussen anymore, huh? >>> >>> Funny that you AREN'T!
Why would I, Sunshine?
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliableBut you insist that Rasmussen is reliable, Sunshine.
Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin'
Biden the highest marks. Are you changing your collective
minds now (such as they are)? The bottom line is that the
senile pervert's numbers have TANKED.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
LOL! I just report the data, Fool. Gallup IS a reliable pollster.There was a time when you were that minority of Merkins approving a
senile pervert in office.
"Trump Leaves on a Personal Low Note
The 34% job approval rating for Trump in Gallup's Jan. 4-15 poll is
one point lower than his prior lowest single rating, registered on
several occasions in late 2017. "
- Gallup
The senile pervert Lyin' Biden is wanting voters to put him into
office for another FOUR YEARS while most people don't want him to
run. Even you libtards here WON'T go on the record saying that you
WANT the pervert to run again.
On 2023-05-03 19:20, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 3:04:57 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:e-biden.aspx >>>> Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 10:37:24 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-jo >>>>
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:
There was a time when you were that minority of Merkins approvinganymore, huh? >>> >>> Funny that you AREN'T!
But you insist that Rasmussen is reliable, Sunshine.Why would I, Sunshine?
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliable
Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin'
Biden the highest marks. Are you changing your collective
minds now (such as they are)? The bottom line is that the
senile pervert's numbers have TANKED.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
LOL! I just report the data, Fool. Gallup IS a reliable
pollster.
a senile pervert in office.
"Trump Leaves on a Personal Low Note The 34% job approval rating
for Trump in Gallup's Jan. 4-15 poll is one point lower than his
prior lowest single rating, registered on several occasions in late
2017. " - Gallup
The senile pervert Lyin' Biden is wanting voters to put him intoI'm just an observer, Sunshine.
office for another FOUR YEARS while most people don't want him to
run. Even you libtards here WON'T go on the record saying that you
WANT the pervert to run again.
And one thing I observe is that the same poll says that most people in
the US don't want Trump to run either.
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 10:26:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-03 19:20, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 3:04:57 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:e-biden.aspx >>>> Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 10:37:24 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-jo >>>>>>
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job:
I'm just an observer, Sunshine.There was a time when you were that minority of Merkins approvinganymore, huh? >>> >>> Funny that you AREN'T!
But you insist that Rasmussen is reliable, Sunshine.Why would I, Sunshine?
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliable
Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin'
Biden the highest marks. Are you changing your collective
minds now (such as they are)? The bottom line is that the
senile pervert's numbers have TANKED.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
LOL! I just report the data, Fool. Gallup IS a reliable
pollster.
a senile pervert in office.
"Trump Leaves on a Personal Low Note The 34% job approval rating
for Trump in Gallup's Jan. 4-15 poll is one point lower than his
prior lowest single rating, registered on several occasions in late
2017. " - Gallup
The senile pervert Lyin' Biden is wanting voters to put him into
office for another FOUR YEARS while most people don't want him to
run. Even you libtards here WON'T go on the record saying that you
WANT the pervert to run again.
And one thing I observe is that the same poll says that most people in
the US don't want Trump to run either.
I will give you credit for actually reading the poll. But if there is a rerun of the 2020 election they will have to decide between a senile, criminal pervert and a former President who made life MUCH better for them.
On 2023-05-09 20:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:57:16 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 10:26:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You mean like lowering unemployment to a 50 year record?
On 2023-05-03 19:20, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 3:04:57 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:e-biden.aspx >>>> Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 10:37:24 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-jo
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to the job: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm just an observer, Sunshine.There was a time when you were that minority of Merkins approving >>>>>> a senile pervert in office.anymore, huh? >>> >>> Funny that you AREN'T!
But you insist that Rasmussen is reliable, Sunshine.Why would I, Sunshine?
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how unreliable
Rasmussen was even as I pointed out that they gave Lyin'
Biden the highest marks. Are you changing your collective >>>>>>>>> minds now (such as they are)? The bottom line is that the >>>>>>>>> senile pervert's numbers have TANKED.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
LOL! I just report the data, Fool. Gallup IS a reliable
pollster.
"Trump Leaves on a Personal Low Note The 34% job approval rating >>>>>> for Trump in Gallup's Jan. 4-15 poll is one point lower than his >>>>>> prior lowest single rating, registered on several occasions in late >>>>>> 2017. " - Gallup
The senile pervert Lyin' Biden is wanting voters to put him into
office for another FOUR YEARS while most people don't want him to >>>>> run. Even you libtards here WON'T go on the record saying that you >>>>> WANT the pervert to run again.
And one thing I observe is that the same poll says that most people in >>>> the US don't want Trump to run either.
I will give you credit for actually reading the poll. But if there is a rerun of the 2020 election they will have to decide between a senile, criminal pervert and a former President who made life MUCH better for them.
:-)
LOL! You have a knack for finding a speck of gold in a MOUNTAIN OF SHIT. Tell me, does working for less make you feel good?I don't live in the US...
...and you'd be crowing like crazy if Trump had lowered unemployment
like this.
On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 8:23:37 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:e-biden.aspx >>>> Funny you're not gloating about Rasmussen
On 2023-05-09 20:15, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 8:57:16 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-04 19:04, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 10:26:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-05-03 19:20, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 3:04:57 PM UTC-7, Bigbird
wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 10:37:24 AM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-05-01 18:16, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-7,https://news.gallup.com/poll/329384/presidential-approval-ratings-jo >>>>>>>>>>
Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-30 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:34:02 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-28 19:42, Tommy wrote:
The senile pervert is obviously not up to
the job:
I don't live in the US...You mean like lowering unemployment to a 50 year record?I'm just an observer, Sunshine.There was a time when you were that minority of Merkinsanymore, huh? >>> >>> Funny that you AREN'T!
But you insist that Rasmussen is reliable,Why would I, Sunshine?
It's enough that you're ashamed to point to
them now.
Hardly - but you libtards kept telling me how
unreliable Rasmussen was even as I pointed out
that they gave Lyin' Biden the highest marks. Are
you changing your collective minds now (such as
they are)? The bottom line is that the senile
pervert's numbers have TANKED.
Sunshine.
YOU have pinned your credibility to it.
LOL! I just report the data, Fool. Gallup IS a
reliable pollster.
approving a senile pervert in office.
"Trump Leaves on a Personal Low Note The 34% job
approval rating for Trump in Gallup's Jan. 4-15 poll is
one point lower than his prior lowest single rating,
registered on several occasions in late 2017. " -
Gallup
The senile pervert Lyin' Biden is wanting voters to put
him into office for another FOUR YEARS while most people
don't want him to run. Even you libtards here WON'T go on
the record saying that you WANT the pervert to run
again.
And one thing I observe is that the same poll says that
most people in the US don't want Trump to run either.
I will give you credit for actually reading the poll. But if
there is a rerun of the 2020 election they will have to
decide between a senile, criminal pervert and a former
President who made life MUCH better for them.
:-)
LOL! You have a knack for finding a speck of gold in a MOUNTAIN
OF SHIT. Tell me, does working for less make you feel good?
...and you'd be crowing like crazy if Trump had lowered
unemployment like this.
Unemployment IS down - but Lyin' Biden had NOTHING to do with it.
was TOTALLY the result of people that were laid off b/c of the
shutdown being rehired.
Because unemployment stats ONLY cover people
ACTIVELY looking for work, the REAL employment number is the Labor Participation Rate. I have harped on this NUMEROUS times, so this
should be very well known to you. Read this article BEFORE you
reply: https://www.forbes.com/sites/qai/2023/01/25/unemployment-is-low-but-so-is-the-labor-force-participation-rate---whats-going-on-in-the-us-labor-market/?sh=62cd60de244e
"The U-3 unemployment rate is the one you hear reported on the news,
but it does not provide a complete picture of employment in the U.S."
"One reason unemployment has remained low is the low labor force participation rate." But, ALL you want to hear is ANYTHING favorable
to Lyin' Biden. This senile pervert is WELL PAST his Use By Date and
SHOULD be retired. Almost ANYBODY (except Konfused Kamala) would be a
better choice than this criminal.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 73:27:37 |
| Calls: | 6,714 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,246 |
| Messages: | 5,357,174 |