• Bragg LOSES in court Pomerantz must testify

    From Tommy@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 19 22:56:15 2023
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Thu Apr 20 00:25:46 2023
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/

    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the federal government.

    Not a single one.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Apr 20 08:12:55 2023
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/
    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the federal government.

    Not a single one.

    Don't try to get a job as a Constitutional Expert, Fool - you don't know SHIT!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Thu Apr 20 08:52:45 2023
    On 2023-04-20 08:12, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight. >>>
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/
    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the federal government. >>
    Not a single one.

    Don't try to get a job as a Constitutional Expert, Fool - you don't know SHIT!

    Show me just one "right" granted to the federal government, Sunshine.

    Just one.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Tommy on Thu Apr 20 09:50:11 2023
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 11:12:57 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/
    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the federal government.

    Not a single one.

    Don't try to get a job as a Constitutional Expert, Fool - you don't know SHIT!

    Speaking of which…

    20 April 2023:
    “ Former Trump Investigator Mark Pomerantz Avoids Jim Jordan Circus for Now”

    < https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/former-trump-investigator-mark-pomerantz-must-appear-for-jim-jordan-1234718864/>

    While I do agree that Congress does have a role in assessing things for establishing policy, it seems very inappropriate and unprofessional to invoke at a time when it could interfere with the fairness of an ongoing trial. Of course,
    for Gym Jordan, that’s probably the point.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Apr 20 16:51:23 2023
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 9:50:13 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 11:12:57 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/
    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the federal government.

    Not a single one.

    Don't try to get a job as a Constitutional Expert, Fool - you don't know SHIT!
    Speaking of which…

    20 April 2023:
    “ Former Trump Investigator Mark Pomerantz Avoids Jim Jordan Circus for Now”

    < https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/former-trump-investigator-mark-pomerantz-must-appear-for-jim-jordan-1234718864/>

    While I do agree that Congress does have a role in assessing things for establishing policy, it seems very inappropriate and unprofessional to invoke
    at a time when it could interfere with the fairness of an ongoing trial. Of course,
    for Gym Jordan, that’s probably the point.

    -hh

    If Bragg is misusing federal funds to persecute innocent people Jordan not only CAN investigate that, he has a DUTY to do so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Thu Apr 20 17:24:03 2023
    On 2023-04-20 16:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 9:50:13 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 11:12:57 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight. >>>>>
    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/
    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the federal government.

    Not a single one.

    Don't try to get a job as a Constitutional Expert, Fool - you don't know SHIT!
    Speaking of which…

    20 April 2023:
    “ Former Trump Investigator Mark Pomerantz Avoids Jim Jordan Circus for Now”

    < https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/former-trump-investigator-mark-pomerantz-must-appear-for-jim-jordan-1234718864/>

    While I do agree that Congress does have a role in assessing things for
    establishing policy, it seems very inappropriate and unprofessional to invoke
    at a time when it could interfere with the fairness of an ongoing trial. Of course,
    for Gym Jordan, that’s probably the point.

    -hh

    If Bragg is misusing federal funds to persecute innocent people Jordan not only CAN investigate that, he has a DUTY to do so.

    Trump clearly isn't innocent.

    He was an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial that resulted in
    convictions of his co-conspirator, Michael Cohen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Apr 20 20:56:55 2023
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 8:24:06 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 16:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 9:50:13 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 11:12:57 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/
    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the federal government.

    Not a single one.

    Don't try to get a job as a Constitutional Expert, Fool - you don't know SHIT!
    Speaking of which…

    20 April 2023:
    “ Former Trump Investigator Mark Pomerantz Avoids Jim Jordan Circus for Now”

    < https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/former-trump-investigator-mark-pomerantz-must-appear-for-jim-jordan-1234718864/>

    While I do agree that Congress does have a role in assessing things for >> establishing policy, it seems very inappropriate and unprofessional to invoke
    at a time when it could interfere with the fairness of an ongoing trial. Of course,
    for Gym Jordan, that’s probably the point.

    -hh

    If Bragg is misusing federal funds to persecute innocent people Jordan not only CAN investigate that, he has a DUTY to do so.

    Trump clearly isn't innocent.

    He was an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial that resulted in convictions of his co-conspirator, Michael Cohen.

    Not only that…
    “ WAPO: Crazoid election denier Mike Lindell once offered to pay
    $5 Mil to anyone who could prove the Chinese hadn’t hacked the
    2020 election for Biden. A private arbitration panel just ruled that
    Robert Zeidman had done so, & ordered Lindell to pay him the $5 Mil.”

    Salty tears!

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bruce bowser@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sun Apr 23 07:46:14 2023
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 11:12:57 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/
    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the federal government.

    Not a single one.
    Don't try to get a job as a Constitutional Expert, Fool - you don't know SHIT!

    And you do? Is this some kind of a joke?
    ========
    "Pomerantz Will Be Accompanied By A Lawyer From Bragg's Office,"

    House Republicans, Manhattan district attorney's office reach deal over Trump inquiryCBC News - April 21, 2023
    -- https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/republicans-trump-indictment-manhattan-district-attorney-1.6819235

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Apr 23 18:13:04 2023
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 5:24:06 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 16:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 9:50:13 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 11:12:57 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional right of oversight.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/
    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the federal government.

    Not a single one.

    Don't try to get a job as a Constitutional Expert, Fool - you don't know SHIT!
    Speaking of which…

    20 April 2023:
    “ Former Trump Investigator Mark Pomerantz Avoids Jim Jordan Circus for Now”

    < https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/former-trump-investigator-mark-pomerantz-must-appear-for-jim-jordan-1234718864/>

    While I do agree that Congress does have a role in assessing things for >> establishing policy, it seems very inappropriate and unprofessional to invoke
    at a time when it could interfere with the fairness of an ongoing trial. Of course,
    for Gym Jordan, that’s probably the point.

    -hh

    If Bragg is misusing federal funds to persecute innocent people Jordan not only CAN investigate that, he has a DUTY to do so.
    Trump clearly isn't innocent.

    He was an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial that resulted in convictions of his co-conspirator, Michael Cohen.

    LOL! Then WHY have a trial? Just take him out into the parking lot and SHOOT HIM!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sun Apr 23 18:36:06 2023
    On 2023-04-23 18:13, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 5:24:06 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-20 16:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 9:50:13 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 11:12:57 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
    On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-04-19 22:56, Tommy wrote:
    Basically, Jordan SLAMS Bragg with the Constitutional
    right of oversight.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3959548-judge-denies-braggs-bid-to-block-house-gops-subpoena-of-mark-pomerantz-in-ny-trump-case/



    Quote this alleged "right", Sunshine.

    Here's a hint.

    There are no RIGHTS in your constitution assigned to the
    federal government.

    Not a single one.

    Don't try to get a job as a Constitutional Expert, Fool -
    you don't know SHIT!
    Speaking of which…

    20 April 2023: “ Former Trump Investigator Mark Pomerantz
    Avoids Jim Jordan Circus for Now”

    <
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/former-trump-investigator-mark-pomerantz-must-appear-for-jim-jordan-1234718864/>



    While I do agree that Congress does have a role in assessing
    things for establishing policy, it seems very inappropriate
    and unprofessional to invoke at a time when it could interfere
    with the fairness of an ongoing trial. Of course, for Gym
    Jordan, that’s probably the point.

    -hh

    If Bragg is misusing federal funds to persecute innocent people
    Jordan not only CAN investigate that, he has a DUTY to do so.
    Trump clearly isn't innocent.

    He was an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial that resulted in
    convictions of his co-conspirator, Michael Cohen.

    LOL! Then WHY have a trial? Just take him out into the parking lot
    and SHOOT HIM!!

    That's what Trump would do...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)