On other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with no ifs and buts...
Didn't go well for Biden...
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs and
buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency, for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old grievances.
This can not be elections for leader of the free world. Maybe US is not
that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On other hand how
can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will respect the
election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with no ifs and
buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time unintelligible,
losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far behind.
Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:
Didn't go well for Biden...
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs
and buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an
asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency,
for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do
something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old
grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free
world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but
missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On
other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will
respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with
no ifs and buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being
wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the
topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time
unintelligible, losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far
behind. Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
Breaking ... NY Times editorial board this evening is calling for Joe
to get out of the race.
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1806820999695904899
Discuss!
JD?
meh, shit happens. Even Sampras threw up on court once. I'd vote for
Joe in a coma before I'd vote for Trump. But if another credible option arises that has a chance to beat Trump I could support them.
Dark days ahead....
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:
Didn't go well for Biden...
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs
and buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an
asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency,
for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do
something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old
grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free
world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but
missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On
other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will
respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with
no ifs and buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being
wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the
topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time
unintelligible, losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far
behind. Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
Breaking ... NY Times editorial board this evening is calling for Joe
to get out of the race.
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1806820999695904899
Discuss!
JD?
meh, shit happens. Even Sampras threw up on court once. I'd vote for
Joe in a coma before I'd vote for Trump. But if another credible option arises that has a chance to beat Trump I could support them.
Dark days ahead....
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
I'm definitely for replacing Biden, he'll just lose to Trump. And I
also tend to think that people shouldn't pick potted plants for
presidents.
Who would be a good replacement / no-no... Newsome? Obamas? Kennedy?
Whitmer? Kamala?
Newsome is someking of woke maniac / pretender? Was it him who talked
about reparations for blacks in California?
Obamas - either one would be good I think
Kennedy - OK
Whitmer - No idea who she is
Kamala - Hell no.
Hillary - won't happen.
Bernie - what is he, like 90 now?
Buttigieg - a bridge too far?
That's the problem. They're all too old, nuts, untrustworthy, or simply have no chance. Maybe this guy has a chance as a write-in though...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/25/texas-name-change-election-candidate
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:>> I'm definitely for replacing Biden, he'll just lose to > Trump. And I> also tend to think that people shouldn't pick potted plants for> presidents.>> Who would be a good replacement / no-no... Newsome? Obamas? > Kennedy?>Whitmer? Kamala?>> Newsome is someking of woke maniac / pretender? Was it him who > talked> about reparations for blacks in California?>> Obamas - either one would be good I think>> Kennedy - OK>> Whitmer - No idea who she is>> Kamala - Hell no.>>
Ever thought about not voting for national office if no candidates cross the threshold of acceptability?
On 6/28/24 4:20 PM, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 29.6.2024 klo 2.09:I don't think he has national appeal, but who knows?
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:
Didn't go well for Biden...
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs
and buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an
asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency, >>>>> for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do
something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old
grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free
world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but
missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On
other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will >>>>> respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with >>>>> no ifs and buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being
wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the
topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time
unintelligible, losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far
behind. Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
Breaking ... NY Times editorial board this evening is calling for Joe
to get out of the race.
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1806820999695904899
Discuss!
JD?
meh, shit happens. Even Sampras threw up on court once. I'd vote
for Joe in a coma before I'd vote for Trump. But if another credible
option arises that has a chance to beat Trump I could support them.
Dark days ahead....
I'm definitely for replacing Biden, he'll just lose to Trump. And I
also tend to think that people shouldn't pick potted plants for
presidents.
Who would be a good replacement / no-no... Newsome? Obamas? Kennedy?
Whitmer? Kamala?
Newsome is someking of woke maniac / pretender? Was it him who talked
about reparations for blacks in California?
Obamas - either one would be good I thinkBarrack cannot run again, by law. It's two terms,max, not simply limited
to two i n a row.
Kennedy - OKThe term "loose cannon" does not come close to fully describing him.
The pretty michigan governor. That's all I know at this point.
Whitmer - No idea who she is
Once a ho, always a ho...
Kamala - Hell no.
No chance.
Hillary - won't happen.
No chance.
Bernie - what is he, like 90 now?
Buttigieg - a bridge too far?
First openly gay head of state in modern times?
How about Janet Yellen? US treasury sec?
On 6/28/24 4:33 PM, Scall5 wrote:
On 6/28/2024 6:09 PM, jdeluise wrote:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:
Didn't go well for Biden...
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs
and buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an
asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency, >>>>> for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do
something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old
grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free
world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but
missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On
other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will >>>>> respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with >>>>> no ifs and buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being
wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the
topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time
unintelligible, losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far
behind. Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
Breaking ... NY Times editorial board this evening is calling for Joe
to get out of the race.
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1806820999695904899
Discuss!
JD?
meh, shit happens. Even Sampras threw up on court once. I'd vote
for Joe in a coma before I'd vote for Trump. But if another credible
option arises that has a chance to beat Trump I could support them.
Dark days ahead....
Ever thought about voting for a 3rd party candidate? The last time the
USA had a budget surplus was after Ross Perot scared the crap out of
the uni-party (Republicans and Democrats) in 1992.
Ever thought about not voting for national office if no candidates cross
the threshold of acceptability?
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:
Didn't go well for Biden...
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs
and buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an
asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency,
for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do
something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old
grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free
world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but
missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On
other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will
respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with
no ifs and buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being
wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the
topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time
unintelligible, losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far
behind. Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
Breaking ... NY Times editorial board this evening is calling for Joe
to get out of the race.
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1806820999695904899
Discuss!
JD?
These guys calling for Biden to step down are idiots. They're probably
the same ones who were 1) predicting a resounding Biden victory 2) Trump wouldn't show or 3) Trump is a bad "debater". I was amazed at how
confident liberal media was beforehand... for some reason they always underestimate Trump's skill at this form of "debating" (which isn't
debating, not really).
And whoever prepped Biden on this debate was an idiot and should be
fired.
On 6/29/24 3:51 AM, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 29.6.2024 klo 9.09:I've thought about the circumstances surrounding the debate, some. They
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:
Didn't go well for Biden...
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs
and buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an
asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency, >>>>> for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do
something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old
grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free
world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but
missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On
other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will >>>>> respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with >>>>> no ifs and buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being
wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the
topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time
unintelligible, losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far
behind. Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
Breaking ... NY Times editorial board this evening is calling for Joe
to get out of the race.
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1806820999695904899
Discuss!
JD?
These guys calling for Biden to step down are idiots. They're
probably the same ones who were 1) predicting a resounding Biden
victory 2) Trump wouldn't show or 3) Trump is a bad "debater". I was
amazed at how confident liberal media was beforehand... for some
reason they always underestimate Trump's skill at this form of
"debating" (which isn't debating, not really).
I don't think they're idiots at all.
Unless they thought that Biden is 100% and would ace the debate, only
now waking to reality of his condition.
It's been pretty obvious quite some time to me. And he's not getting
better but further declining. What may have fooled some were his
performances reading a prompter which he has still been able to do
somewhat ok. Also they've been covering up for him, telling people how
sharp he still is.
And whoever prepped Biden on this debate was an idiot and should be
fired.
Yes, someone thought that he's still cognitively normal. Maybe they're
buying their own propaganda.
Trump seemed like he had almost no preparation at all. His performance
was terrible as well. The only positive thing I can say that at least
he didn't come off as a potted plant.
cause one to think even more, and wonder.
First, was the debate necessary to Biden's re-election? Unless his
backers were fearful that he'd lose to a convicted felon, it seems to be
to Biden's disadvantage--although to *not* agree to the debates could be
spun up as a negative by Trump. But, again, he's a convicted felon, so...
Next, it's doubtful to me that anyone working closely day-to-day with
Biden would not be aware of his rapidly advancing dementia. And yet his
camp *agreed* to two debates. It implies that everyone around him knew
what the likely outcome might be.
Then, the timing of the debate. It seemed to me to be inordinately
early. Why so early?
So if you put this together for a speculative scenario, you had the
Biden side agreeing to debate against an opponent who we're not even
certain can run for office, or hold it, if elected, exposing a semi-functional senior publicly in a very, very risky venue, and
agreeing to a very early date for this extremely risky debate.
One might suppose that Biden, the person, the life-long loyal party man,
was sacrificed by his handlers simply to provide a plausible popular
excuse to replace him on the ticket; they already knew he could not last
thru the campaign, let alone the next four years. And they did it early enough in the process to have most of the disruptive public fall-out
settle before November.
Let's get this done as soon as possible.
It also neatly sidesteps retaining Kamala Harris in a position of being
one heartbeat from the presidency. Assuming that they are politically astute enough to see that Harris cannot likely win as the pres
candidate, the handlers of the Demo political apparatus can either allow
the replacement candidate to choose his/her own running mate, or shove
Harris farther away from the likelihood of assuming the office from the
vice presidency because a new candidate will ostensibly not have one
foot in the grave and the other in a rest home, as Biden clearly does.
Last ironic observation...
We're a bit cynical and worldly here on RST, or would like to picture ourselves in that light. So we've all maintained that for each chief executive or national leader in the western democracies there's a covert leadership cadre that actually makes the policy decisions. And that this
may be true to greater or lesser extent depending on the specific leader.
But has it ever been more apparent that a democratic nation is being
run, day-to-day, by someone other that the folks you voted into office?
It's very, very scary when you think about it. The nation is in fact and beyond all doubt being run by people with no public accountability. You
can not even *name* them with certainty, let alone hold them to account.
Sawfish kirjoitti 29.6.2024 klo 19.38:
On 6/29/24 3:51 AM, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 29.6.2024 klo 9.09:I've thought about the circumstances surrounding the debate, some.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:
Didn't go well for Biden...
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs >>>>>> and buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an
asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency, >>>>>> for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do >>>>>> something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old
grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free
world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but
missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On
other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will >>>>>> respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with >>>>>> no ifs and buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being
wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the
topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time
unintelligible, losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far
behind. Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
Breaking ... NY Times editorial board this evening is calling for Joe >>>>> to get out of the race.
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1806820999695904899
Discuss!
JD?
These guys calling for Biden to step down are idiots. They're
probably the same ones who were 1) predicting a resounding Biden
victory 2) Trump wouldn't show or 3) Trump is a bad "debater". I was
amazed at how confident liberal media was beforehand... for some
reason they always underestimate Trump's skill at this form of
"debating" (which isn't debating, not really).
I don't think they're idiots at all.
Unless they thought that Biden is 100% and would ace the debate, only
now waking to reality of his condition.
It's been pretty obvious quite some time to me. And he's not getting
better but further declining. What may have fooled some were his
performances reading a prompter which he has still been able to do
somewhat ok. Also they've been covering up for him, telling people
how sharp he still is.
And whoever prepped Biden on this debate was an idiot and should be
fired.
Yes, someone thought that he's still cognitively normal. Maybe
they're buying their own propaganda.
Trump seemed like he had almost no preparation at all. His
performance was terrible as well. The only positive thing I can say
that at least he didn't come off as a potted plant.
They cause one to think even more, and wonder.
First, was the debate necessary to Biden's re-election? Unless his
backers were fearful that he'd lose to a convicted felon, it seems to
be to Biden's disadvantage--although to *not* agree to the debates
could be spun up as a negative by Trump. But, again, he's a convicted
felon, so...
Next, it's doubtful to me that anyone working closely day-to-day with
Biden would not be aware of his rapidly advancing dementia. And yet
his camp *agreed* to two debates. It implies that everyone around him
knew what the likely outcome might be.
Then, the timing of the debate. It seemed to me to be inordinately
early. Why so early?
So if you put this together for a speculative scenario, you had the
Biden side agreeing to debate against an opponent who we're not even
certain can run for office, or hold it, if elected, exposing a
semi-functional senior publicly in a very, very risky venue, and
agreeing to a very early date for this extremely risky debate.
One might suppose that Biden, the person, the life-long loyal party
man, was sacrificed by his handlers simply to provide a plausible
popular excuse to replace him on the ticket; they already knew he
could not last thru the campaign, let alone the next four years. And
they did it early enough in the process to have most of the disruptive
public fall-out settle before November.
Let's get this done as soon as possible.
It also neatly sidesteps retaining Kamala Harris in a position of
being one heartbeat from the presidency. Assuming that they are
politically astute enough to see that Harris cannot likely win as the
pres candidate, the handlers of the Demo political apparatus can
either allow the replacement candidate to choose his/her own running
mate, or shove Harris farther away from the likelihood of assuming the
office from the vice presidency because a new candidate will
ostensibly not have one foot in the grave and the other in a rest
home, as Biden clearly does.
Sounds a bit of a conspiracy theory... but yes, I think very much
plausible scenario.
The other option is that Joe's inner circle is very small and others
bought the 'he's sharp as ever' story...
But yes, it may be easier to let things roll on their own weight (aka be possibly exposed at debate) than to do anything about it.
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
Then, the timing of the debate. It seemed to me to be inordinately
early. Why so early?
So if you put this together for a speculative scenario, you had the
Biden side agreeing to debate against an opponent who we're not even
certain can run for office, or hold it, if elected, exposing a
semi-functional senior publicly in a very, very risky venue, and
agreeing to a very early date for this extremely risky debate.
It was my understanding that Biden's team proposed it, not simply agreed
to it. I suspect he's not normally as bad as he was on debate night.
He was giving a speech with a more powerful, less halting voice on
Friday and he certainly looked more lively. I guess gramps needs an
early bedtime.
On 29/06/2024 01:34, *skriptis wrote:> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:>> Ever thought about not voting for national office if no candidates cross the threshold of acceptability?> > > What good comes out of that?> > > Logically it'spointless and meaningless and harmful. You've got to vote.> > > The only legit reason is if you believe voting is a kind of consent to the system and system being evil, you object to consenting and signing anything with satan?much agreed and Sawfish
On 7/1/24 9:21 AM, The Iceberg wrote:> On 29/06/2024 01:29, *skriptis wrote:>> jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>> TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:>> I'm definitely for replacing Biden, he'll >>> just lose to > Trump. And I> also tend to thinkthat people >>> shouldn't pick potted plants for> presidents.>> Who would be a good >>> replacement / no-no... Newsome? Obamas? > Kennedy?> Whitmer? >>> Kamala?>> Newsome is someking of woke maniac / pretender? Was it him >>> who > talked> about
I am beginning to think that severely limiting the voting franchise in the US would solve a lot, but this is completely politically unacceptable. The current tendency is exactly the opposite.So next best is a prolonged national trauma of some sort thatdoes not kill everyone. It would force a reset of popular values, I think. "Thumbs up" would no longer be the ultimate goal.Seriously.BTW, I forgot. My niece visited Dalmatia a couple of weeks ago. She says that it's the best place she has been in
But in bigger cities it's even worse.
During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.
*skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:
But in bigger cities it's even worse.
During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.
Flooded?
Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani, Albanian, Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)
Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...
*skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:> But in bigger cities it's even worse.> During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.Flooded?Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani, Albanian, Italian, and Hungarian),unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...
TT kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 23.29:> *skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:>> But in bigger cities it's even worse.>> During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.> > Flooded?> > Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak,Romani, Albanian, > Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)> > Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...> Btw Skrip, do you know financial youtuber Sven Carlin?Is he a Croat?I quite like his content.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:runspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...
*skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:> But in bigger cities it's even worse.> During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.Flooded?Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani, Albanian, Italian, and Hungarian),
I said post COVID hoax the great replacement was put into action here. You didn't read my post.
https://www.glasistre.hr/gospodarstvo/2023/07/13/u-hrvatskoj-radi-vise-od-100-tisuca-stranaca-graditeljstvo-i-turizam-vise-ne-mogu-bez-azijaca-873515
A year ago. 100k alien workers.
https://023.hr/2024/05/u-hrvatsku-je-u-prva-cetiri-mjeseca-doslo-najmanje-73-tisuce-stranih-radnika-najvise-nepalaca-i-bosanaca/
First 4 months of 2024, 73k aliens arrived, mostly Nepal and Bosnia-Herzegovina. But it's mostly Nepal, they put B-H here to calm people.
(All Croats from Bosnia-Herzegovina have Croatian papers/passports, e.g. Cilic, Dodig etc) so these kind of stats that mention "Bosnians" mean we talk about non-Croat B-H citizens, meaning either Yugo-moslems or Serbs.
TT kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 23.29:
*skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:
But in bigger cities it's even worse.
During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.
Flooded?
Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani,
Albanian, Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)
Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...
Btw Skrip, do you know financial youtuber Sven Carlin?
Is he a Croat?
I quite like his content.
On 7/1/24 1:54 PM, *skriptis wrote:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:rGiven today's realities, only a fool would not choose a level of anonymity.
TT kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 23.29:> *skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo
22.29:>> But in bigger cities it's even worse.>> During the last 4
years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.> > Flooded?> > Croat
91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani, Albanian, >
Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)> > Seems that
you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...> Btw
Skrip, do you know financial youtuber Sven Carlin?Is he a Croat?I
quite like his content.
No one is named Sven here (outside of theater folks and their kids)
and literally no one has Carlin surname written in English with C.
Too bizarre.
Yet he claims he's local.
https://svencarlin.com/about-me
It could be a stage name?
The older I get,the *less* I rely on experts; therefore the person's
identity is of less importance than the content. This is not to say that
one shouldn't consider possible tendencies and biases, but in point of
fact, the content has to withstand all rigorous testing.
Fuck what Warren Buffet has to say about taxes. :^)
I'm among those true natives, but lots of people from all over the Balkans, came here in recent decades. So it's still 100% our genetic pool but you see lots of different surnames in schools for example and it's unsettling imo.
*skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:
But in bigger cities it's even worse.
During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.
Flooded?
Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani, Albanian, Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)
Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...
On 1.7.2024 23.29, TT wrote:> *skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:>> But in bigger cities it's even worse.>> During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.> > Flooded?> > Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak,Romani, Albanian, > Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)> > Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...> You don't either. Only about 150k are of Asian (includes ME) or African descent. Less than 3% of the
On 1.7.2024 23.29, TT wrote:
*skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:
But in bigger cities it's even worse.
During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.
Flooded?
Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani,
Albanian, Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)
Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...
You don't either. Only about 150k are of Asian (includes ME) or African descent. Less than 3% of the population. If you don't think the above minorities are anything to write home about, then this isn't either.
This is why Sunak has done nothing to stop the woke dumbness and has let
as many illegal migrants flood into the country as possible.
On 02/07/2024 09:54, *skriptis wrote:
Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los> Wrote in message:r
On 1.7.2024 23.29, TT wrote:> *skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo
22.29:>> But in bigger cities it's even worse.>> During the last 4
years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.> > Flooded?> > Croat
91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani, Albanian, >
Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)> > Seems that
you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...> You
don't either. Only about 150k are of Asian (includes ME) or African
descent. Less than 3% of the population. If you don't think the above
minorities are anything to write home about, then this isn't
either.-- "And off they went, from here to there,The bear, the bear,
and the maiden fair"-- Traditional
If it was 3 people you'd have a point, it's ok to have 3 aliens to
show for, but 3% is a national catastrophe.
no you can totally trust Pelle, we had his sort in London in the 2000's forever telling us not to worry cos "immigrants are such a small % it
won't matter". Whites are now a dwindling minority % in London, thanks
Pelle for being so honest, as per usual.
On 02/07/2024 09:03, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
On 1.7.2024 22.29, *skriptis wrote:
I'm among those true natives, but lots of people from all over the
Balkans, came here in recent decades. So it's still 100% our genetic
pool but you see lots of different surnames in schools for example
and it's unsettling imo.
Lol.
Pelle why don't you tell us which country you come from so we can
compare genetic pool there? let me guess it's still 100% which you don't
mind at all LOL
Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los> Wrote in message:rRomani, Albanian, > Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)> > Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...> You don't either. Only about 150k are of Asian (includes ME) or African descent. Less than 3% of the
On 1.7.2024 23.29, TT wrote:> *skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:>> But in bigger cities it's even worse.>> During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.> > Flooded?> > Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak,
If it was 3 people you'd have a point, it's ok to have 3 aliens to show for, but 3% is a national catastrophe.
The Iceberg kirjoitti 2.7.2024 klo 12.35:
This is why Sunak has done nothing to stop the woke dumbness and has
let as many illegal migrants flood into the country as possible.
Yes. I recently saw a stat about it. During Sunak's reign the
immigration numbers from 3rd world countries had exploded.
On 1.7.2024 23.29, TT wrote:
*skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo 22.29:
But in bigger cities it's even worse.
During the last 4 years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.
Flooded?
Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani,
Albanian, Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)
Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east, Asia...
You don't either. Only about 150k are of Asian (includes ME) or African descent. Less than 3% of the population.
If you don't think the above
minorities are anything to write home about, then this isn't either.
The Iceberg kirjoitti 2.7.2024 klo 18.12:
On 02/07/2024 09:54, *skriptis wrote:
Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los> Wrote in message:r
On 1.7.2024 23.29, TT wrote:> *skriptis kirjoitti 1.7.2024 klo
22.29:>> But in bigger cities it's even worse.>> During the last 4
years or so, we're being flooded by true aliens.> > Flooded?> >
Croat 91.6%, Serb 3.2%, other 3.9% (including Bosniak, Romani,
Albanian, > Italian, and Hungarian), unspecified 1.3% (2021 est.)> >
Seems that you don't have hardly any from Africa / Middle-east,
Asia...> You don't either. Only about 150k are of Asian (includes
ME) or African descent. Less than 3% of the population. If you don't
think the above minorities are anything to write home about, then
this isn't either.-- "And off they went, from here to there,The
bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"-- Traditional
If it was 3 people you'd have a point, it's ok to have 3 aliens to
show for, but 3% is a national catastrophe.
no you can totally trust Pelle, we had his sort in London in the
2000's forever telling us not to worry cos "immigrants are such a
small % it won't matter". Whites are now a dwindling minority % in
London, thanks Pelle for being so honest, as per usual.
Yes, the stat doesn't seem to be correct.
Sources often seem to have creative calculus to make immigrant
percentages appear smaller.
Googling "immigrant background" may get a
bit more credible numbers but there are still likely quite a few groups
that are not included...
You don't either. Only about 150k are of Asian (includes ME) or
African descent. Less than 3% of the population.
Oy, vey! I made an error. Total 259 074. End of 2023.
On 6/28/24 4:33 PM, Scall5 wrote:
On 6/28/2024 6:09 PM, jdeluise wrote:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:
Didn't go well for Biden...
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs
and buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an
asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency, >>>>> for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do
something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old
grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free
world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but
missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On
other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will >>>>> respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with >>>>> no ifs and buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being
wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the
topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time
unintelligible, losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far
behind. Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
Breaking ... NY Times editorial board this evening is calling for Joe
to get out of the race.
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1806820999695904899
Discuss!
JD?
meh, shit happens. Even Sampras threw up on court once. I'd vote
for Joe in a coma before I'd vote for Trump. But if another credible
option arises that has a chance to beat Trump I could support them.
Dark days ahead....
Ever thought about voting for a 3rd party candidate? The last time the
USA had a budget surplus was after Ross Perot scared the crap out of
the uni-party (Republicans and Democrats) in 1992.
Ever thought about not voting for national office if no candidates cross
the threshold of acceptability?
In article <v60c80$1hllp$2@dont-email.me>,Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los> wrote:>On 1.7.2024 22.29, *skriptis wrote:>> I'm among those true natives, but lots of people from all over the Balkans, came here in recent decades. So>it's still 100% ourgenetic pool but you see lots of different surnames in schools for example and it's>unsettling imo.>>Lol.Didn't twist say he was from Russia?
On 1.7.2024 22.29, *skriptis wrote:
I'm among those true natives, but lots of people from all over the Balkans, came here in recent decades. Soit's still 100% our genetic pool but you see lots of different surnames in schools for example and it's
unsettling imo.
Lol.
-=-=-=-=-=-
bmoore@nyx.net (bmoore) Wrote in message:r
In article <v60c80$1hllp$2@dont-email.me>,Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los> wrote:>On 1.7.2024 22.29,*skriptis wrote:>> I'm among those true natives, but lots of people from all over the Balkans, came here in
recent decades. So>it's still 100% our genetic pool but you see lots of different surnames in schools for
example and it's>unsettling imo.>>Lol.Didn't twist say he was from Russia?
Didn't jdeluise say he won't use socks anymore?
On 7/6/24 1:52 PM, bmoore wrote:
In article <7zIfO.16912$OcBd.9478@fx07.ams1>,
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/28/24 4:33 PM, Scall5 wrote:But 3rd party candidates can make a difference, for better or worse. Perot helped Clinton against Bush I. Nader
On 6/28/2024 6:09 PM, jdeluise wrote:Ever thought about not voting for national office if no candidates cross >>> the threshold of acceptability?
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:Ever thought about voting for a 3rd party candidate? The last time the >>>> USA had a budget surplus was after Ross Perot scared the crap out of
TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:meh, shit happens. Even Sampras threw up on court once. I'd vote >>>>> for Joe in a coma before I'd vote for Trump. But if another credible >>>>> option arises that has a chance to beat Trump I could support them.
Didn't go well for Biden...Breaking ... NY Times editorial board this evening is calling for Joe >>>>>> to get out of the race.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521
Ouch!
Biden really showed that he's at halfway house to dementia. No ifs >>>>>>> and buts about it. Meanwhile Trump reminded people that he's an
asshole with massive character flaws. Both are unfit for presidency, >>>>>>> for different reasons. Will Democrats be able to admit this and do >>>>>>> something about it?
Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old
grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free
world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.
Trump did hammer home the immigration angle imo effectively but
missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On
other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will >>>>>>> respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes" with >>>>>>> no ifs and buts... it's just not possible for him to admit being >>>>>>> wrong, ever.
Biden was helped by Roe/Wade questions but turned *himself* the
topic to immigrant crimes (facepalm). Was also half of the time
unintelligible, losing train of thought etc. Not good.
Trump was talking so much nonsense, but Biden wasn't far
behind. Questions were left unanswered.
"I didn't have sex with a porn star"
:)))
https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1806820999695904899
Discuss!
JD?
Dark days ahead....
the uni-party (Republicans and Democrats) in 1992.
helped Bush II against Gore.
The same effect was achieved simply by not voting.
In article <aEiiO.20281$OLZf.2745@fx10.ams1>,Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> wrote:>On 7/6/24 1:52 PM, bmoore wrote:>> In article <7zIfO.16912$OcBd.9478@fx07.ams1>,>> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> wrote:>>> On 6/28/24 4:33 PM, Scall5 wrote:>>>> On 6/28/2024 6:09 PM, jdeluise wrote:>>>>> TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:>>>>>>>>>>> TT kirjoitti 28.6.2024 klo 21.07:>>>>>>> Didn't go well for Biden...>>>>>>> https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806557731244986521>>>>>>> Ouch!>>>>>>> Biden really showed that he's at
immigration angle imo effectively but>>>>>>> missed opportunities on drug problem in Biden's America etc. On>>>>>>> other hand how can you be so dumb that when you're asked if you will>>>>>>> respect the election results you don't answer with simple "yes"something about it?>>>>>>> Ugly farce, the debate was, two old guys airing their old>>>>>>> grievances. This can not be elections for leader of the free>>>>>>> world. Maybe US is not that any more, if it ever was.>>>>>>> Trump did hammer home the
In article <v6cbp9$2s0$1@sunce.iskon.hr>,
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
bmoore@nyx.net (bmoore) Wrote in message:r
In article <v60c80$1hllp$2@dont-email.me>,Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los> wrote:>On 1.7.2024 22.29,*skriptis wrote:>> I'm among those true natives, but lots of people from all over the Balkans, came here in
recent decades. So>it's still 100% our genetic pool but you see lots of different surnames in schools for
example and it's>unsettling imo.>>Lol.Didn't twist say he was from Russia? >>
Didn't jdeluise say he won't use socks anymore?
What's jd got to do, got to do with it?
bmoore kirjoitti 7.7.2024 klo 0.47:
In article <v6cbp9$2s0$1@sunce.iskon.hr>,
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
bmoore@nyx.net (bmoore) Wrote in message:r
In article <v60c80$1hllp$2@dont-email.me>,Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los> wrote:>On 1.7.2024 22.29,*skriptis wrote:>> I'm among those true natives, but lots of people from all over the Balkans, came here in
recent decades. So>it's still 100% our genetic pool but you see lots of different surnames in schools for
example and it's>unsettling imo.>>Lol.Didn't twist say he was from Russia? >>>
Didn't jdeluise say he won't use socks anymore?
What's jd got to do, got to do with it?
JD is only one here who doesn't like Russia?
But yes, I think skriptis did admit to being Russian scum.
On 7/8/24 6:05 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On 07/07/2024 20:50, TT wrote:
bmoore kirjoitti 7.7.2024 klo 0.47:
In article <v6cbp9$2s0$1@sunce.iskon.hr>,
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
bmoore@nyx.net (bmoore) Wrote in message:r
In article <v60c80$1hllp$2@dont-email.me>,Pelle Svanslös*skriptis wrote:>> I'm among those true natives, but lots of people
<pelle@svans.los> wrote:>On 1.7.2024 22.29,
from all over the Balkans, came here in
recent decades. So>it's still 100% our genetic pool but you see
lots of different surnames in schools for
example and it's>unsettling imo.>>Lol.Didn't twist say he was from
Russia?
Didn't jdeluise say he won't use socks anymore?
What's jd got to do, got to do with it?
JD is only one here who doesn't like Russia?
But yes, I think skriptis did admit to being Russian scum.
doesn't jdeluise love Russians? he posted saying last year saying he
rescued an LGBTQ++ family from Russia??
It might be a lot of fun trying to figure just what an LGBTQ++ family
might be...
On 06/07/2024 22:47, bmoore wrote:
In article <v6cbp9$2s0$1@sunce.iskon.hr>,
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
bmoore@nyx.net (bmoore) Wrote in message:r
In article <v60c80$1hllp$2@dont-email.me>,Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los> wrote:>On 1.7.2024 22.29,*skriptis wrote:>> I'm among those true natives, but lots of people from all over the Balkans, came here in
recent decades. So>it's still 100% our genetic pool but you see lots of different surnames in schools for
example and it's>unsettling imo.>>Lol.Didn't twist say he was from Russia? >>>
Didn't jdeluise say he won't use socks anymore?
What's jd got to do, got to do with it?
aren't you "very close" friends with him, shall we say?
In article <s4TiO.20302$OLZf.6240@fx10.ams1>,
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/8/24 6:05 AM, The Iceberg wrote:It's like a C++ family?
On 07/07/2024 20:50, TT wrote:It might be a lot of fun trying to figure just what an LGBTQ++ family
bmoore kirjoitti 7.7.2024 klo 0.47:doesn't jdeluise love Russians? he posted saying last year saying he
In article <v6cbp9$2s0$1@sunce.iskon.hr>,JD is only one here who doesn't like Russia?
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-What's jd got to do, got to do with it?
bmoore@nyx.net (bmoore) Wrote in message:r
In article <v60c80$1hllp$2@dont-email.me>,Pelle Svanslös*skriptis wrote:>> I'm among those true natives, but lots of people >>>>>>> from all over the Balkans, came here in
<pelle@svans.los> wrote:>On 1.7.2024 22.29,
recent decades. So>it's still 100% our genetic pool but you see
lots of different surnames in schools for
example and it's>unsettling imo.>>Lol.Didn't twist say he was from >>>>>>> Russia?
Didn't jdeluise say he won't use socks anymore?
But yes, I think skriptis did admit to being Russian scum.
rescued an LGBTQ++ family from Russia??
might be...
I guess in a sense LGBTQ++ is a programming language... :^)
O-O, too. Eminently extensible, can create your own classes, and objects >derived from them...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 361 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 82:25:28 |
| Calls: | 7,713 |
| Files: | 12,854 |
| Messages: | 5,723,832 |