• (OT) Trump mocks the disabled, immigrants, and women. His voters laugh.

    From =?UTF-8?Q?Pelle_Svansl=C3=B6s?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 16 15:24:36 2024
    Trump's cruelty plays to worst of human nature. For his MAGA supporters,
    that's the point.

    There is no point in making a rule that no one wants to break. The
    reason almost every religion teaches some form of the Golden Rule − "Do
    unto others as you would have them do unto you" − is because humans are
    wired to do the opposite.

    That is particularly true of suffering. We do not want anyone to make us
    suffer but often derive pleasure from other people’s misfortune. The
    German language has a word for it: schadenfreude. Who hasn’t thrilled
    just a bit when a rival is taken down a peg, or when a self-righteous
    hypocrite is exposed?

    It also kicks in to cement our group identities. From sports teams to
    political parties, the reward centers of our brain light up both when
    our team wins and when the other team falters. We justify even cruel
    behavior toward those we perceive as a threat to our group’s success,
    way of life or values.

    Tragically, political discourse has turned this common human weakness
    into a virtue, celebrating the ways we inflict pain on one another.

    It is no longer news that former President Donald Trump takes great
    delight in ridiculing political opponents and anyone who crosses him.
    With a mix of derisive nicknames, mockery, insulting physical
    descriptions and baseless accusations, he has turned transgression into
    an art form.

    Yet, millions of Americans remain captivated by his displays of cruelty. Attendees at his rallies laugh and cheer − disparaging not only
    political adversaries but also ethnic groups, disabled individuals, undocumented immigrants, women who call out abuse and others.
    Conservative media outlets relish replaying the clips.

    Adam Serwer, a staff writer for The Atlantic, has argued that “cruelty
    is part of human nature” and American history. It’s not inherently right
    or left wing.

    But in the case of Trump and many of his most ardent supporters, “the
    cruelty is the point”: “Somewhere on the wide spectrum between
    adolescent teasing and the smiling white men in the lynching photographs
    are the Trump supporters whose community is built by rejoicing in the
    anguish of those they see as unlike them, who have found in their shared cruelty an answer to the loneliness and atomization of modern life.”

    Trump's blend of political attack and personal insult has been rewarded
    with enormous amounts of airtime and control of the Republican Party.
    What gets rewarded gets repeated, of course, so politicians and
    strategists of various stripes have tried to capture the appeal of
    verbal abuse.

    Even Trump’s detractors cannot turn away from this political theater of “us” and “them.”

    As scholars of religion and diverse members of the body politic, we
    cannot remain silent as this poison continues to corrode the soul of our nation. The tongue is a small part of the body, but its fire can do
    great damage, as the New Testament author James warns (James 3:5-8).

    It’s not about Trump. It’s about us − if we don’t reject the politics of
    cruelty. Our parents and schools teach us not to bully others but to
    report bullies, stand up to them and build people up rather than tear
    people down, even people we view as different.

    For this reason, the Hebrew Bible’s most repeated instruction involves
    the stranger: “You shall not oppress a stranger, for you know the heart
    of the stranger, having yourselves been strangers in the land of Egypt” (Exodus 23:9). “Love the stranger as yourself” (Leviticus 19:34) − and similarly over 30 times.

    The natural response to experiences of oppression is to do the same to
    others if we get the chance, but our religious values teach us otherwise.

    Perhaps the clearest picture of how we are all harmed when cruelty is
    given free rein emerges from another arena in which we face this
    challenge. At the end of January, social media CEOs appeared before the
    Senate Judiciary Committee to give an account for how their platforms
    place children and youth at significant risk of great harm resulting
    from online bullying and harassment.

    Parents shared stories about children who committed suicide. Kids talked
    about cyberbullying ruining their lives. Others showed up just to make
    clear that children are priorities, not products.

    The culture of cruelty makes witnesses afraid to stand up lest they
    become targets themselves. They make excuses for it or write it off as a meaningless joke. Sometimes they join in. Everyone is enveloped in a
    cloud of shame − those who spew the hate, those who are targeted and
    those who hear it but do nothing. The social fabric frays and puts
    everyone at risk.

    The Senate committee held the social media giants accountable.
    Dismantling the culture of cruelty in political life, however, requires
    us all to take responsibility. As parents and citizens, we cannot simply
    teach about the Golden Rule. We must model it.

    https://eu.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2024/02/15/trump-campaign-cruelty-immigrants-disabled-2024-election/72512425007/

    Yes. We must model it and we must teach lessons in modelling. Behind the
    barn.

    --
    “If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best
    colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him
    somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.”

    -- Lyndon B. Johnson

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)