Sawfish <
sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
On 2/8/24 9:53 AM, *skriptis wrote:> https://dailystormer.in/france-study-finds-people-not-having-sex-anymore/>>>> Is Anglin right on this one?>> Prostitution = marriage?>>>>>I think there is validity in a lot of his statements in this article.One way
to look at some marriages is prostitution on a retainer.But in other marriages a very real personal attachment, based on shared values/goals, makes it a different sort of an arrangement; so sex brings you together, and shared values keeps you together.
In that case is closer to a corporation. I suspect that homosexual domestic relationships are like this, although they cannot coalesce around child-rearing in the same way. Like adoptive hetero parents, they can go thru the motions, sorta, and they like
to *think* that it's identical, but I am convinced it's not the same blood bond that exists for natural parents.But yep, marriage likely did spring from voluntary sexual favors for protection/subsistence.I also think that the natural state of affairs is
likely polygamy, with the strongest male taking all the females he wants.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Doncha know,That it's a shame and a pityYou were raisedUp in the cityAnd you never learned nothin''
bout country ways." --Not So Sweet Martha Lorraine~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes monogamy was socialism (pussy for all) polygamy (best takes all) was capitalism and "free love" was anarchy.
No?
--
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)