• Sinner lost yet another final what a giant surprise!

    From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 20 01:00:41 2023
    Sinner lost yet another final and as always he was totally useless, as keep pointing out, will everyone now finally admit he needs a slam winning coach?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Mon Nov 20 19:33:51 2023
    On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 4:00:44 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
    Sinner lost yet another final and as always he was totally useless, as keep pointing out, will everyone now finally admit he needs a slam winning coach?

    A slam winning coach will make everything change? Don't be stupid, baboon! Cahill is a good coach. Sinner is a very good player obviously and he's improved a lot in the past couple of months under Cahill but he's also a limited player whereas Djokovic
    isn't. That's the problem IMO and not whether he has a coach who has won a slam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 21 01:54:19 2023
    On Tuesday, 21 November 2023 at 03:33:53 UTC, Court_1 wrote:
    On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 4:00:44 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
    Sinner lost yet another final and as always he was totally useless, as keep pointing out, will everyone now finally admit he needs a slam winning coach?
    A slam winning coach will make everything change? Don't be stupid, baboon! Cahill is a good coach. Sinner is a very good player obviously and he's improved a lot in the past couple of months under Cahill but he's also a limited player whereas Djokovic
    isn't. That's the problem IMO and not whether he has a coach who has won a slam.

    how many glasses of wine have you had tonight?! what if Djoker bombs out randomly to Raonic or someone like that in a fluke match and Sinner ends up playing Alcaraz or Tsitsipas in the final? Sinner would still lose cos he's useless in finals. He
    desperately needs a slam-winning coach to give him a chance in a situation like that or to take him to the next level whereby he routinely beats your new fave player the Djoker!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Tue Nov 21 15:55:48 2023
    On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 4:54:21 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Tuesday, 21 November 2023 at 03:33:53 UTC, Court_1 wrote:
    On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 4:00:44 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
    Sinner lost yet another final and as always he was totally useless, as keep pointing out, will everyone now finally admit he needs a slam winning coach?
    A slam winning coach will make everything change? Don't be stupid, baboon! Cahill is a good coach. Sinner is a very good player obviously and he's improved a lot in the past couple of months under Cahill but he's also a limited player whereas
    Djokovic isn't. That's the problem IMO and not whether he has a coach who has won a slam.

    how many glasses of wine have you had tonight?!

    Zero. I rarely drink alcohol.


    what if Djoker bombs out randomly to Raonic or someone like that in a fluke match and Sinner ends up playing Alcaraz or Tsitsipas in the final? Sinner would still lose cos he's useless in finals. He desperately needs a slam-winning coach to give him a
    chance in a situation like that or to take him to the next level whereby he routinely beats your new fave player the Djoker!


    A slam-winning coach isn't always the answer. Did Magnus Norman win any slams? Look at what he did with Wawrinka.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gracchus@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 21 16:48:21 2023
    On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:55:50 PM UTC-8, Court_1 wrote:
    On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 4:54:21 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Tuesday, 21 November 2023 at 03:33:53 UTC, Court_1 wrote:
    On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 4:00:44 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
    Sinner lost yet another final and as always he was totally useless, as keep pointing out, will everyone now finally admit he needs a slam winning coach?
    A slam winning coach will make everything change? Don't be stupid, baboon! Cahill is a good coach. Sinner is a very good player obviously and he's improved a lot in the past couple of months under Cahill but he's also a limited player whereas
    Djokovic isn't. That's the problem IMO and not whether he has a coach who has won a slam.

    how many glasses of wine have you had tonight?!

    Zero. I rarely drink alcohol.

    Good. Stay away from alcohol and cigarettes and you'll keep your petite body looking nubile well into old age. ;)

    what if Djoker bombs out randomly to Raonic or someone like that in a fluke match and Sinner ends up playing Alcaraz or Tsitsipas in the final? Sinner would still lose cos he's useless in finals. He desperately needs a slam-winning coach to give him a
    chance in a situation like that or to take him to the next level whereby he routinely beats your new fave player the Djoker!

    A slam-winning coach isn't always the answer. Did Magnus Norman win any slams? Look at what he did with Wawrinka.

    I'm surprised you didn't use the example of your favorite coach--Brad Gilbert!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From PeteWasLucky@21:1/5 to Gracchus on Wed Nov 22 02:06:23 2023
    Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:55:50PM UTC-8, Court_1 wrote:> On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 4:54:21AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote: > > On Tuesday, 21 November 2023 at 03:33:53 UTC, Court_1 wrote: > > > On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 4:00:44AM
    UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote: > > > > Sinner lost yet another final and as always he was totally useless, as keep pointing out, will everyone now finally admit he needs a slam winning coach? > > > A slam winning coach will make everything change? Don't be
    stupid, baboon! Cahill is a good coach. Sinner is a very good player obviously and he's improved a lot in the past couple of months under Cahill but he's also a limited player whereas Djokovic isn't. That's the problem IMO and not whether he has a coach
    who has won a slam. > > how many glasses of wine have you had tonight?!> Zero. I rarely drink alcohol.Good. Stay away from alcohol and cigarettes and you'll keep your petite body looking nubile well into old age. ;)> >what if Djoker bombs out randomly to
    Raonic or someone like that in a fluke match and Sinner ends up playing Alcaraz or Tsitsipas in the final? Sinner would still lose cos he's useless in finals. He desperately needs a slam-winning coach to give him a chance in a situation like that or to
    take him to the next level whereby he routinely beats your new fave player the Djoker!> A slam-winning coach isn't always the answer. Did Magnus Norman win any slams? Look at what he did with Wawrinka.I'm surprised you didn't use the example of your
    favorite coach--Brad Gilbert!

    He is smart enough to stay away from Sinner. Maybe Sinner is young enough to get a chance to win a couple of slams when Novak retires, but then who knows, Sinner may retire before Novak does :)
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Wed Nov 22 01:50:14 2023
    On Wednesday, 22 November 2023 at 07:06:30 UTC, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    Gracchus <grac...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:55:50 PM UTC-8, Court_1 wrote:> On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 4:54:21 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote: > > On Tuesday, 21 November 2023 at 03:33:53 UTC, Court_1 wrote: > > > On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 4:00:44 AM
    UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote: > > > > Sinner lost yet another final and as always he was totally useless, as keep pointing out, will everyone now finally admit he needs a slam winning coach? > > > A slam winning coach will make everything change? Don't be
    stupid, baboon! Cahill is a good coach. Sinner is a very good player obviously and he's improved a lot in the past couple of months under Cahill but he's also a limited player whereas Djokovic isn't. That's the problem IMO and not whether he has a coach
    who has won a slam. > > how many glasses of wine have you had tonight?!> Zero. I rarely drink alcohol.Good. Stay away from alcohol and cigarettes and you'll keep your petite body looking nubile well into old age. ;)> >what if Djoker bombs out randomly to
    Raonic or someone like that in a fluke match and Sinner ends up playing Alcaraz or Tsitsipas in the final? Sinner would still lose cos he's useless in finals. He desperately needs a slam-winning coach to give him a chance in a situation like that or to
    take him to the next level whereby he routinely beats your new fave player the Djoker!> A slam-winning coach isn't always the answer. Did Magnus Norman win any slams? Look at what he did with Wawrinka.I'm surprised you didn't use the example of your
    favorite coach--Brad Gilbert!

    He is smart enough to stay away from Sinner. Maybe Sinner is young enough to get a chance to win a couple of slams when Novak retires, but then who knows, Sinner may retire before Novak does :)

    we should all see Sinner as a far, far worse version of Andy Murray, he does have a good match up vs Djoker and potential to beat him at slams but he's clueless how to get there, so he desperately needs a coach who's won a slam to help him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to Gracchus on Wed Nov 22 17:01:41 2023
    On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 7:48:23 PM UTC-5, Gracchus wrote:
    On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:55:50 PM UTC-8, Court_1 wrote:
    On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 4:54:21 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Tuesday, 21 November 2023 at 03:33:53 UTC, Court_1 wrote:
    On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 4:00:44 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
    Sinner lost yet another final and as always he was totally useless, as keep pointing out, will everyone now finally admit he needs a slam winning coach?
    A slam winning coach will make everything change? Don't be stupid, baboon! Cahill is a good coach. Sinner is a very good player obviously and he's improved a lot in the past couple of months under Cahill but he's also a limited player whereas
    Djokovic isn't. That's the problem IMO and not whether he has a coach who has won a slam.

    how many glasses of wine have you had tonight?!

    Zero. I rarely drink alcohol.
    Good. Stay away from alcohol and cigarettes and you'll keep your petite body looking nubile well into old age. ;)

    WTF? I don't even know how to respond to that! 🤔 How do you know whether I'm petite or not?


    what if Djoker bombs out randomly to Raonic or someone like that in a fluke match and Sinner ends up playing Alcaraz or Tsitsipas in the final? Sinner would still lose cos he's useless in finals. He desperately needs a slam-winning coach to give him
    a chance in a situation like that or to take him to the next level whereby he routinely beats your new fave player the Djoker!

    A slam-winning coach isn't always the answer. Did Magnus Norman win any slams? Look at what he did with Wawrinka.
    I'm surprised you didn't use the example of your favorite coach--Brad Gilbert!

    I actually thought about Magnus Norman first and then Gilbert second! Both Cahill and Gilbert are examples of decent coaches.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Wed Nov 22 17:05:57 2023
    On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 4:50:16 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Wednesday, 22 November 2023 at 07:06:30 UTC, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    Gracchus <grac...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:55:50 PM UTC-8, Court_1 wrote:> On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 4:54:21 AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote: > > On Tuesday, 21 November 2023 at 03:33:53 UTC, Court_1 wrote: > > > On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 4:00:44
    AM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote: > > > > Sinner lost yet another final and as always he was totally useless, as keep pointing out, will everyone now finally admit he needs a slam winning coach? > > > A slam winning coach will make everything change? Don't be
    stupid, baboon! Cahill is a good coach. Sinner is a very good player obviously and he's improved a lot in the past couple of months under Cahill but he's also a limited player whereas Djokovic isn't. That's the problem IMO and not whether he has a coach
    who has won a slam. > > how many glasses of wine have you had tonight?!> Zero. I rarely drink alcohol.Good. Stay away from alcohol and cigarettes and you'll keep your petite body looking nubile well into old age. ;)> >what if Djoker bombs out randomly to
    Raonic or someone like that in a fluke match and Sinner ends up playing Alcaraz or Tsitsipas in the final? Sinner would still lose cos he's useless in finals. He desperately needs a slam-winning coach to give him a chance in a situation like that or to
    take him to the next level whereby he routinely beats your new fave player the Djoker!> A slam-winning coach isn't always the answer. Did Magnus Norman win any slams? Look at what he did with Wawrinka.I'm surprised you didn't use the example of your
    favorite coach--Brad Gilbert!

    He is smart enough to stay away from Sinner. Maybe Sinner is young enough to get a chance to win a couple of slams when Novak retires, but then who knows, Sinner may retire before Novak does :)

    we should all see Sinner as a far, far worse version of Andy Murray, he does have a good match up vs Djoker and potential to beat him at slams but he's clueless how to get there, so he desperately needs a coach who's won a slam to help him.

    Sinner plays nothing like Andy Murray, you silly baboon! 🙄

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)